| stan | Can I have both s3 and file backend enabled for glance with kolla ansible? Basically I want a file backend with netapp nfs, they seem to do some internal optimisation for copying the glance image to cinder volume when they are using same backend. basically I want a highly available glance, when using a shared file backend? | 04:06 |
|---|---|---|
| stan | is this possible, I understand having a file backend that is not shared and having glance highly available, would lead to problems, but having a shared filesystem like nfs mounted on all controllers would greatly benefit from a highly available glance? | 04:08 |
| stan | I would think adding an additional mount to the glace container, and changing the globals yaml with glance_api_hosts and data_dir param would be enough? | 04:24 |
| opendevreview | Pierre Riteau proposed openstack/kayobe master: Use TinyIPA images from stable/2023.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/921705 | 06:56 |
| opendevreview | Martin Hiner proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Move Nova roles after OVS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/921846 | 07:39 |
| opendevreview | Rafal Lewandowski proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [WIP] Enable ML2/OVN and distributed FIP by default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/904959 | 07:58 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Bump Ansible versions to 2.16 and 2.17 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/921743 | 08:12 |
| opendevreview | Pierre Riteau proposed openstack/kayobe master: Revert "[release] Use OpenStack 2024.1 release" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/921922 | 08:43 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Bump Ansible versions to 2.16 and 2.17 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/921743 | 08:51 |
| opendevreview | Rafal Lewandowski proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [WIP] Enable ML2/OVN and distributed FIP by default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/904959 | 09:08 |
| opendevreview | Gaël THEROND proposed openstack/kolla master: [WIP] - Add new hardware prometheus exporter: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/921658 | 09:20 |
| Fl1nt | Hi everyone! | 09:22 |
| Fl1nt | quick question | 09:22 |
| Fl1nt | is there something existing on our image build process for sources where the name of the resulting folder once the archive is extracted is a bit clancky? | 09:23 |
| Fl1nt | I'm working on this: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/921658 | 09:23 |
| Fl1nt | but right now, I'm kinda required to use a very dirty hardcoded release versioning on the Dockerfile template :'( | 09:24 |
| Fl1nt | I'm pretty sure you guys already thought about it, so I'm wondering ^^ | 09:24 |
| opendevreview | Gaël THEROND proposed openstack/kolla master: Add new hardware prometheus exporter: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/921658 | 09:55 |
| Fl1nt | @mnasiadka, regarding the bmc_exporter name, I just renamed the binary as the original one was named idrac_exporter dispit supporting multiple bmc type (iLO/iDRAC/xClarity). | 09:58 |
| mnasiadka | it's either idrac exporter or bmc exporter, the idrac one looks bloody weird that all metrics are prefixed with idrac name | 09:59 |
| Fl1nt | yep, I'll switch to the one you suggested | 10:00 |
| SvenKieske | Fl1nt: are you referring to this? ./idrac_exporter-helm-idrac-exporter-${prometheus-bmc-exporter-version}/cmd/idrac_exporter | 10:03 |
| SvenKieske | not sure what you are specifically asking for right now | 10:03 |
| SvenKieske | if you are talking about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/921658/3/kolla/common/sources.py you should specify the github download location via the "releases" path on github imho, not via "achive/refs/tags", like the other packages do as well | 10:06 |
| Fl1nt | SvenKieske, yep | 10:06 |
| SvenKieske | mhm, do the releases only contain the helm charts (the name seems to inidcate that)? weird project structure.. | 10:07 |
| Fl1nt | SvenKieske, the project structure is a bit weird, yes, the helm named archive is only containing the charts, the sources.tar.gz one does contain the code, hence why I can't use the release/ path | 10:08 |
| SvenKieske | well if you gonna switch to another bmc exporter as mnasiadka suggested maybe the problem goes away ;) if not I would suggest opening a bug report at their github, maybe they are not aware that they are doing suboptimal releases? | 10:10 |
| Fl1nt | But I'll switch to the one mnasiadka suggested as it's much better suited for our usage and structure on kolla | 10:10 |
| SvenKieske | nice | 10:10 |
| Fl1nt | I'll suggest them the change too as I already suggested them to publish the binaries as release. | 10:10 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: Skip SLURP jobs on master https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/921935 | 10:30 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: rabbitmq: Add support for using stream queues for fanout https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/916911 | 10:32 |
| opendevreview | Bartosz Bezak proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [CI] Remove SLURP related ansible installation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/921937 | 10:38 |
| opendevreview | Bartosz Bezak proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [CI] Remove SLURP related ansible installation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/921937 | 10:39 |
| opendevreview | Rafal Lewandowski proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [WIP] Enable ML2/OVN and distributed FIP by default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/904959 | 11:28 |
| Fl1nt | mnasiadka, SvenKieske, any reason why we do not cleanup the symlink and temporary working directory on our exporter images? It duplicate data onto the image, sure it's not that of a big deal (few Mb) but yet seems weird enough. | 11:35 |
| mnasiadka | feel free to raise a bug and fix it :) | 11:35 |
| Fl1nt | ok, cool, not a feature tho? | 11:35 |
| mnasiadka | I don't think so | 11:35 |
| Fl1nt | ok, nice | 11:36 |
| opendevreview | Bartosz Bezak proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: Skip SLURP jobs on master https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/921935 | 11:37 |
| opendevreview | Bartosz Bezak proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [CI] Remove SLURP related ansible installation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/921937 | 11:38 |
| opendevreview | Bartosz Bezak proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: Disable SLURP jobs for D cycle https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/921935 | 11:39 |
| opendevreview | Bartosz Bezak proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [CI] Remove SLURP related ansible installation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/921937 | 11:40 |
| Fl1nt | arggh, the gebn exporter is using IPMI approach where the mrlhansen exporter do use the normalized redfish APIs to get much more informations, any thoughts on this? | 11:45 |
| opendevreview | Verification of a change to openstack/kolla-ansible master failed: Move Nova roles after OVS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/921846 | 11:46 |
| Fl1nt | On my own I'm fine with the IPMI approach for now tbh. | 11:52 |
| SvenKieske | I hate to ask again, but what is the reasoning for the above barrage of CI changes? the commit messages are void of any reasoning, as usual. | 11:52 |
| SvenKieske | this is not how we can foster more contributions to kolla, by making everything extra opaque and hard to understand :( | 11:53 |
| opendevreview | Gaël THEROND proposed openstack/kolla master: Add new hardware prometheus exporter: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/921658 | 11:54 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: increase timeout for server resize confirmation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/916396 | 12:04 |
| SvenKieske | okay I _think_ I know why these are removed, nvm, I guess I need to get some sleep after the next slew of meetings | 12:10 |
| SvenKieske | still it would be nice if Commit Messages could adhere to https://docs.openstack.org/contributors/common/git.html#body | 12:11 |
| SvenKieske | namely: " The body should contain all the important information related to the problem, without assuming that the reader understands the source of the problem or has access to external sites." | 12:12 |
| SvenKieske | I honestly waste a lot of time on reviews chasing information not contained in commit messages which should be there. I don't know if I'm the only one. | 12:13 |
| Fl1nt | SvenKieske, yes, sometimes I do have long time digging for information too, but I don't have any insight on your example in here as I don't know what it is about exactly out of "CI related jobs". | 12:15 |
| Fl1nt | but I do agree, meaningful commit body should be more important than stupid rules inherited from 1980 where screens couldn't handle more than 80 columns. | 12:16 |
| SvenKieske | well to add the context for the CI Jobs: I think the reasoning is, that the next cycle upgrade will not be a slurp upgrade and we only need to reintroduce slurp upgrade testing after the next-next(?) release again on master branch? something like that I think is the cause for it, I really need some sleep. | 12:17 |
| SvenKieske | and I agree with your perception of the rules in openstack land (to be fair they are not kolla specific afaik), but I wouldn't voice it this sharply. I can live with short lines, that's just annoying, not a big problem, there are bigger issues (like contributor count) :) | 12:19 |
| SvenKieske | maybe I should finally start a blogpost on openstack contributing, title would be smth like "death by a thousand papercuts, or how to improve developer onboarding for large projects" | 12:50 |
| SvenKieske | I must say I like the new additions in gerrit lately, e.g. the ability to have a "suggestion" button in the comment field is really nice, a small thing, but very nice. | 12:51 |
| opendevreview | Verification of a change to openstack/kolla-ansible master failed: Move Nova roles after OVS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/921846 | 13:29 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Bump Ansible versions to 2.16 and 2.17 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/921743 | 14:28 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: drop docker pin https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/920460 | 14:29 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: WIP: CI: Template out kolla-build.conf using role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/903771 | 14:30 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible master: Move Nova roles after OVS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/921846 | 16:10 |
| Fl1nt | SvenKieske, yep, I'm all in sync with your comments ^^ | 18:11 |
| opendevreview | Gaël THEROND proposed openstack/kolla master: Add new hardware prometheus exporter: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/921658 | 20:01 |
| opendevreview | Gaël THEROND proposed openstack/kolla master: Add new hardware prometheus exporter: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/921658 | 20:03 |
| opendevreview | Freerk-Ole Zakfeld proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Allow haproxy to listen to more than 1 address https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/916586 | 20:34 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!