opendevreview | wu.chunyang proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [doc] fix typo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/914224 | 02:05 |
---|---|---|
kevko | frickler: Deploy split glance-api services (from kolla etherpad assigned to you ) ...does it mean that we want to split glance-api, glance-cache ..etc ? | 09:35 |
frickler | kevko: no, split internal and public glance-api because they need different config. https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/OSSN/OSSN-0090 | 09:41 |
opendevreview | Maksim Malchuk proposed openstack/kayobe stable/2023.1: Adds support for custom RabbitMQ configuration. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/914433 | 09:44 |
kevko | frickler: ahaaaaa, makes sense ... | 09:45 |
kevko | do anybody know what roles should swift user have ? | 10:40 |
kevko | https://9ac1c3d783172b4449eb-5a8686bba096ed86a1b08b0134617eb6.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/914411/2/check/kolla-ansible-ubuntu-swift/8f42f09/primary/logs/tempest/reports/tempest-smoke.html | 10:40 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [DNM] Try to turn on swift tempest smoke tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/914411 | 11:07 |
SvenKieske | kevko: I assume swift uses the keystone_auth backend? https://docs.openstack.org/swift/latest/overview_auth.html#keystone-auth I don't really know much about swift, as we mostly just use ceph rgw instead. | 11:30 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [DNM] Try to turn on swift tempest smoke tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/914411 | 11:43 |
greatgatsby | Good day. We've upgraded from yoga to zed in our dev environment. Seem to be having an issue with swift-s3. I keep getting "The request signature we calculated does not match the signature you provided". From googling, a lot of people seem to get this due to path-style vs virtual-host-style, but I can't see anywhere this has changed between yoga and zed. Grepped through release notes and didn't find anything there either. Any help | 12:23 |
greatgatsby | is appreciated. | 12:23 |
kevko | greatgatsby: try to ask in swift channel | 12:41 |
greatgatsby | thanks... still digging into logs here, but haven't found anything yet. I'll update in there if/when I get it working | 12:50 |
dawudm | frickler or kevko would you be able to review this please https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/913597 | 13:01 |
kevko | dawudm: done | 13:08 |
frickler | greatgatsby: do you actually use swift or ceph+radosgw? | 13:09 |
dawudm | Thanks kevko | 13:12 |
dawudm | if you could take a look at this too kevko I would much appreciate it https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/913320/3 :) | 13:12 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [DNM] Try to turn on swift tempest smoke tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/914411 | 13:13 |
greatgatsby | frickler: afaik just swift, backed by flasharray network storage. We have 2 dev environments right now, one is still on yoga and swift-s3 is still working, another we've upgraded to zed that's having swift-s3 issues immediately following the deploy. I don't think it's an endpoint issue either, but we did see a lot of endpoint refactoring between yoga and zed. | 13:19 |
frickler | yeah, I have no idea why people prefer swift over ceph, can't help with that | 13:22 |
kevko | frickler: i also don't know ..but i thought that swift is very cheap storage ... | 13:23 |
greatgatsby | swift is just the object storage api, no? Our actual storage backend is a large flasharray. | 13:27 |
SvenKieske | yeah, I'm also not sure what kevko was meaning with "cheap storage". swift and rgw are just object/s3 compatible apis with autn/authz. if you are a heavy user of these it might matter which one you use though, because in the details the apis actually differ and don't have feature parity | 13:29 |
SvenKieske | last time I looked, that is. for 99% of use cases it doesn't matter tbf. | 13:30 |
greatgatsby | that's exactly how I understand it, and how we've implemented it, it's just an API on top of some kind of storage, whatever that may be. We use swift to expose object storage via both the swift API and the S3 API. | 13:31 |
kevko | SvenKieske: wikipedia uses swift :) | 13:33 |
kevko | SvenKieske: or used to use | 13:33 |
SvenKieske | okay? not sure how that is related to cheap storage, but anyway :) | 13:34 |
greatgatsby | it's been rock solid for use, backed by a rather large PureStorage flash array. I wouldn't say it's "cheap" :-) | 13:34 |
greatgatsby | appreciate the help/discussion regardless, I'll keep testing and digging through logs/configs | 13:36 |
SvenKieske | I don't know how active the swift irc channel is, I'd suggest it might be more effective to write your problem to the openstack-discuss ML | 13:38 |
greatgatsby | thanks SvenKieske - hopefully I can figure this out, but if not, I'll try that next | 13:38 |
SvenKieske | good luck :) | 13:39 |
bbezak | kolla meeting in 9! mgoddard mnasiadka bbezak frickler kevko SvenKieske mmalchuk gkoper jangutter jsuazo jovial osmanlicilegi mattcrees dougszu | 13:51 |
bbezak | #startmeeting kolla | 14:00 |
opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Mar 27 14:00:39 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bbezak. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'kolla' | 14:00 |
bbezak | #topic rollcall | 14:00 |
mmalchuk | o/ | 14:00 |
kevko | \o/ | 14:01 |
SvenKieske | o/ | 14:01 |
mattcrees | o/ | 14:01 |
r-krcek | o/ | 14:01 |
mhiner | o/ | 14:01 |
jovial | o/ | 14:01 |
frickler | \o | 14:01 |
bbezak | #topic agenda | 14:02 |
bbezak | * Roll-call | 14:02 |
bbezak | * Agenda | 14:02 |
bbezak | * Announcements | 14:02 |
bbezak | * Review action items from the last meeting | 14:02 |
bbezak | * CI status | 14:02 |
bbezak | * Release tasks | 14:02 |
bbezak | * Regular stable releases (first meeting in a month) | 14:02 |
bbezak | * Current cycle planning | 14:02 |
bbezak | * Additional agenda (from whiteboard) | 14:02 |
bbezak | * Open discussion | 14:02 |
bbezak | #topic CI status | 14:03 |
bbezak | watermelon? | 14:03 |
frickler | red on the inside? ;) | 14:04 |
SvenKieske | watermelon? :D | 14:04 |
SvenKieske | ah! lol | 14:04 |
bbezak | :) | 14:04 |
SvenKieske | didn't get that | 14:04 |
mmalchuk | green outside, red inside))) lol | 14:04 |
bbezak | exactly | 14:04 |
bbezak | not so bad nowadays I think | 14:04 |
SvenKieske | well at least kolla build failrate seems flat since 24.03. | 14:05 |
SvenKieske | wasn't the dashboard supposed to be fixed? I see "no data" again: https://grafana.opendev.org/d/c0d59dad13/kolla-failure-rate?orgId=1 | 14:05 |
SvenKieske | for k-a source graphs, kolla graphs are fine | 14:05 |
bbezak | I think it was working last time I checked | 14:06 |
frickler | I didn't look at it in ages, no idea | 14:06 |
SvenKieske | I'm pretty sure as well it worked, I'm to blame for not looking often enough I guess. :D | 14:06 |
bbezak | ok, let's look into that | 14:06 |
frickler | I haven't seen too many complaints from kevko recently, so CI can't be too red in general, I'd say ;) | 14:07 |
bbezak | yeah, I think it looks good | 14:07 |
kevko | :D | 14:07 |
kevko | centos build is broken | 14:08 |
kevko | but it's non-voting | 14:08 |
SvenKieske | mhm, can I ask something about CI? I know we plan to extend ARM support downstream, ARM pipeline still seems rather flaky | 14:08 |
SvenKieske | and is non voting, if it's in good shape now, could we make it voting? | 14:08 |
frickler | seems there was an issue with centos mirrors earlier today, jrosser was also complaining, should be better now | 14:08 |
frickler | for ARM builds we only have a single cloud provider, that's mostly why we consider it not too reliable | 14:09 |
bbezak | #topic Release tasks | 14:10 |
bbezak | we're in R-1! | 14:10 |
mnasiadka | People running and screaming | 14:11 |
bbezak | :) | 14:11 |
bbezak | https://docs.openstack.org/kolla/latest/contributor/release-management.html#r-1-prepare-kolla-kolla-ansible-for-rc1-stable-branch-creation | 14:11 |
frickler | bit early for branching, isn't it? | 14:11 |
mnasiadka | It says prepare | 14:11 |
mnasiadka | And we will be prepared for next 3 months | 14:12 |
bbezak | let's start to prepare then | 14:12 |
bbezak | I can take a look | 14:12 |
SvenKieske | well the UCA and RDO stuff got merged afaik | 14:12 |
mnasiadka | So let’s have a look what is missing | 14:12 |
mnasiadka | And we need a volunteer to fix Octavia | 14:12 |
kevko | octavia ? what is with octavia ? | 14:13 |
kevko | *wrong | 14:13 |
SvenKieske | do we have a bugreport for octavia? I have only a fuzzy memory what exactly is broken | 14:13 |
mnasiadka | kevko: CI is failing on cascade delete of LB | 14:13 |
kevko | aaaaa, i saw this | 14:13 |
mmalchuk | maybe forgot anything in A-C-K ? again | 14:13 |
bbezak | any volunteer to take a look into octavia in CI ? | 14:14 |
SvenKieske | now, is this a release task? or just regular bugfix? | 14:14 |
mnasiadka | Exploratory surgery | 14:14 |
bbezak | regular bugfix needed for release | 14:15 |
bbezak | :) | 14:15 |
SvenKieske | :D | 14:15 |
kevko | bbezak: i will probably because i am playing with ci and now everything is almost working.... so i am playing around ... | 14:15 |
bbezak | cool | 14:15 |
bbezak | shout if you need help | 14:15 |
kevko | ok .. | 14:15 |
SvenKieske | I got a question regarding the release tasks posted above, it has this gem: "The release notes for each project should be tidied up" and I have no idea what that means even after following the review examples there. | 14:15 |
mnasiadka | It means read through all renos, fix obvious errors, remove duplicates | 14:16 |
SvenKieske | it seems there are mainly old release notes being deleted? I'm not really sure, is this obsolete? | 14:16 |
mnasiadka | So it looks readable for a random person | 14:16 |
SvenKieske | ah okay. weird. I would think this is part of normal code review, but okay, thanks for the explainer :) | 14:16 |
mnasiadka | We have sort of a rule to not obsess over renos in code review | 14:17 |
mnasiadka | And fix it close to release | 14:17 |
jovial | And mistakes do sneek in :) | 14:17 |
mnasiadka | To improve the overall merge flow or something like that | 14:17 |
frickler | some things are also easier to spot with a global view, like consistent formatting, e.g. use ``code`` where applicable | 14:18 |
SvenKieske | ok, I guess I missed those fixes then the last few releases :) thanks for the explanation, I just didn't know how to interpret "tidied up". | 14:18 |
mnasiadka | Ok, I’d like to discuss the ptg schedule if bbezak will permit | 14:18 |
bbezak | I'll think about it | 14:18 |
mnasiadka | I can’t do any other day that Monday, bbezak is on vacation | 14:18 |
bbezak | ok, granted | 14:18 |
bbezak | #topic PTG planning | 14:18 |
mnasiadka | So my proposal is to do Kolla/Kolla-Ansible on Monday for 4 hours | 14:19 |
mnasiadka | And follow up on not discussed topic on the week after if needed | 14:19 |
mnasiadka | Unless frickler or kevko feel an urgent need to drive the Kolla PTG on Tue | 14:20 |
kevko | hmm, we have state holiday :/ | 14:20 |
kevko | but i will probably join .. | 14:20 |
mnasiadka | kevko: on Monday? | 14:20 |
kevko | let me check | 14:21 |
kevko | i am not sure | 14:21 |
SvenKieske | that would be April, 8th | 14:21 |
frickler | I'm fine with skipping Tue | 14:21 |
kevko | okay, we don't :) | 14:22 |
mnasiadka | Ok, so that’s agreed - Monday only | 14:22 |
kevko | +1 | 14:22 |
mnasiadka | jovial: want to move Kayobe? | 14:22 |
mnasiadka | It’s currently planned for Thursday | 14:22 |
jovial | I would prefer Wednesday if we did move it. But does that work for others? | 14:23 |
SvenKieske | does somebody adjust the ptg schedule then? so people are informed? | 14:24 |
mnasiadka | I will adjust and send mail to Ml | 14:24 |
mmalchuk | all this because we skip doodle service) | 14:25 |
mnasiadka | jovial: Kayobe is mainly SHPC - just make sure key people will attend and I’ll move | 14:25 |
jovial | I guess if Kayobe was moved to the Tuesday then we'll avoid the normal kolla IRC meeting | 14:25 |
mnasiadka | mmalchuk: doodle made no sense because you all chose the same slots we used for ages | 14:25 |
mmalchuk | maybe or maybe not | 14:26 |
mmalchuk | anyway we change slots | 14:27 |
bbezak | ok, anything else PTG related? | 14:27 |
bbezak | as a reminder a link to etherpad - https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/kolla-dalmatian-ptg | 14:28 |
bbezak | let's move on | 14:30 |
SvenKieske | #Link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/kolla-dalmatian-ptg | 14:30 |
bbezak | #topic Current cycle planning | 14:30 |
bbezak | does anybody has something to discuss about outstanding tasks? | 14:31 |
bbezak | I was overloaded with customer related tasks recently, so no much update from me I'm affraid | 14:32 |
kevko | I want to ask to merge init-runonce modification to stable branches | 14:32 |
kevko | :) | 14:32 |
SvenKieske | well looking at the caracal tasks not that many are done afaik? | 14:33 |
SvenKieske | anybody has any news on the next ubuntu release? we wanted to build that in for C release | 14:34 |
kevko | 25.4 ? :D | 14:34 |
mmalchuk | nope... silent | 14:34 |
SvenKieske | no, 24.04. | 14:34 |
bbezak | kevko: I've seen a bit discussion the other day. I don't think it is a good idea to modify stable branches without doing the same to master? | 14:35 |
kevko | google saying Ubuntu 24.04 LTS, codenamed Noble Numbat, is scheduled for release on April 25, 2024. | 14:35 |
mmalchuk | SvenKieske ask again afer 25 apr | 14:35 |
mmalchuk | after* | 14:35 |
kevko | bbezak: yes, i want to merge also to master ...same patch ...but it's needed also to merge to stable branches ..as upgrade jobs are checkout ing previous release ... | 14:35 |
SvenKieske | but why was it put on the agenda then? I mean the release dates of ubuntu are pretty well known in advance? weird. | 14:36 |
kevko | bbezak: moreover, it's only runonce script which is only suggested to use as per documentation ...normally it's not used I would say ..with end user | 14:36 |
bbezak | SvenKieske: I think it was just to prepare images building for now. And caracal is a good place for that as it is a SLURP release | 14:37 |
kevko | bbezak: now i hacked ci :D and download script from my github repo to pass upgrade jobs :D | 14:37 |
bbezak | 24.04 feature will be probably backported to caracal anyway at some point | 14:37 |
SvenKieske | ok | 14:38 |
mmalchuk | btw about CI we have an issue with docs site preview. anyone know this? | 14:38 |
SvenKieske | meta: can we maybe clean up the whiteboard? it still has listed e.g. train PTG; afaik a link to some archived document would be enough there, no? the Whiteboard is 880 lines long now and hard to navigate.. | 14:39 |
SvenKieske | sorry, maybe off topic for current cycle planning | 14:39 |
frickler | mmalchuk: where do you see that issue? | 14:40 |
mmalchuk | preview didn't work | 14:40 |
mmalchuk | on any last change | 14:40 |
bbezak | SvenKieske: I'll add it to notes | 14:40 |
mmalchuk | I'll show you... moment | 14:40 |
SvenKieske | bbezak: ty, I can also volunteer to do cleanup or create some archive somewhere (different etherpad) as long as I know what can be cleaned up and what should stay. | 14:41 |
frickler | wfm https://storage.bhs.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_33b/911417/12/check/openstack-tox-docs/33b87a9/docs/ | 14:41 |
SvenKieske | mmalchuk: maybe some storage issue? did you get an (HTTP) error? anything? | 14:42 |
mmalchuk | oops... fixed. looks like infra knows and fixed | 14:42 |
mmalchuk | it was an issue with listing 403 forbidden with banner | 14:43 |
mmalchuk | anyway fixed... lets move ahead | 14:43 |
bbezak | #topic Additional agenda (from whiteboard) | 14:43 |
bbezak | I can see mostly a review requests there | 14:43 |
bbezak | anything to add apart of that? | 14:43 |
SvenKieske | yes :) I already asked this week but I guess if you don't highlight usernames nobody has time :P :D | 14:44 |
mhiner | yes, plus Ivan still has that issue with Docker version on Debian | 14:44 |
bbezak | mhiner, r-krkcek | 14:44 |
bbezak | sorry :) r-krcek | 14:44 |
mhiner | other than that, it's just reviews from me | 14:45 |
SvenKieske | so I'll explicitly mention it here: mnasiadka, frickler: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/855498 please come to a solution where to test ovn-exporter, currently I made it work in the ovn scenario and I honestly would prefer if it stays there, because these tests are pretty brittle | 14:45 |
SvenKieske | meaning it didn't work at all in prometheus-opensearch scenario for many reasons. | 14:46 |
r-krcek | For me its the reviews and one question, but wanted to ask that in the open debate. | 14:46 |
bbezak | #topic Open discussion | 14:47 |
SvenKieske | r-krcek: seems you need to rebase the "add sysctl role change" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/912351 | 14:47 |
r-krcek | I noticed that we have jinja filter for finding out that service is enabled and mapped to host. However, it looks like it is used only with certain services. Is there a specific reason for not using it everywhere or was is just because of lack of time to do it? The filter: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/665922 | 14:47 |
mmalchuk | lets discuss https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla/+bug/2042954 | 14:47 |
r-krcek | SvenKieske: oh, sorry. Ill do that right after the meeting. | 14:48 |
mmalchuk | imho https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/913584 not needed and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/904781 need revert | 14:48 |
mmalchuk | the issue appears in kernel 5.18+ but we have 5.4 and 5.15 maximum | 14:49 |
mmalchuk | the issue not reproduced on Focal and Yoga | 14:50 |
SvenKieske | mmalchuk: case in point: I know people running HWE kernels on jammy, which bumps you up til 6.5 kernel :) | 14:50 |
mmalchuk | HWE is a 5.15 | 14:50 |
opendevreview | Roman Krček proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Update cell0 database connection https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/910924 | 14:50 |
frickler | 22.04-hwe is 6.5 | 14:51 |
mmalchuk | should we support HWE on Jammy in Yoga? Jammy only for transition to Zed | 14:52 |
frickler | yoga is unmaintained, we should not care at all | 14:52 |
mmalchuk | so | 14:52 |
SvenKieske | frickler: maybe we don't have this issue because we have newer openstack? | 14:52 |
SvenKieske | didn't look into it what the actual issue is | 14:52 |
mmalchuk | I've dig deeper | 14:53 |
mmalchuk | the issue only on upstream kernel with old libs | 14:53 |
SvenKieske | funnily enough the bugreport doesn't mention what the bug is, just that there is one. | 14:53 |
SvenKieske | ah this is the original bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/neutron/+bug/1995735 | 14:54 |
mmalchuk | yep | 14:54 |
mmalchuk | I've tested all the libs/packages for issue and provide paste links | 14:55 |
mmalchuk | even if we planed to merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/913584 we need fix issue with pyroute2.protocols | 14:55 |
mmalchuk | we install it in the https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/904781 via packages | 14:55 |
mmalchuk | and it can't be uninstalled via pip | 14:56 |
bbezak | r-krcek: let me get back to you on your services/filter question, I need to check this feature | 14:58 |
SvenKieske | lol? | 14:58 |
SvenKieske | according to https://openstack-ci-reports.ubuntu.com/reports/cloud-archive/yoga_versions.html the package is not called "python3-pyroute2" but "pyroute2" | 14:59 |
SvenKieske | but it's installed via "python3-pyroute2" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/904781/3/docker/openstack-base/Dockerfile.j2 | 14:59 |
SvenKieske | the other versions in the CI also report this package name afaik | 14:59 |
mmalchuk | there is no issues with packages | 14:59 |
kevko | SvenKieske: pyroute2 is source package name | 15:00 |
mmalchuk | in current images we have pyroute2 on both venv and system | 15:00 |
kevko | SvenKieske: python3-pyroute2 is binary package | 15:00 |
SvenKieske | kevko: ah nice, madness.. | 15:00 |
mmalchuk | I've publeshed an edit for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/913584 | 15:00 |
SvenKieske | mmalchuk: understood, seems you are right (beside the HWE kernel version, but those are a moving target anyway) | 15:01 |
kevko | SvenKieske: standard | 15:01 |
SvenKieske | I guess we are in overtime now. | 15:02 |
bbezak | ok guys, I need to jump to some call. However please continue the discussion of course :) | 15:02 |
bbezak | thank you all | 15:02 |
bbezak | #endmeeting | 15:02 |
opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Mar 27 15:02:14 2024 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:02 |
opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2024/kolla.2024-03-27-14.00.html | 15:02 |
opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2024/kolla.2024-03-27-14.00.txt | 15:02 |
opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2024/kolla.2024-03-27-14.00.log.html | 15:02 |
SvenKieske | thanks bbezak | 15:02 |
mmalchuk | bbezak thanks | 15:03 |
opendevreview | Will Szumski proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Adds the neutron_service_limit option https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/877776 | 15:03 |
kevko | what about that init-runonce bbezak :D | 15:03 |
kevko | i didn't get reply | 15:03 |
mmalchuk | folks please review and merge backports: | 15:03 |
SvenKieske | he replied that it should go in master first I guess? | 15:03 |
mmalchuk | https://review.opendev.org/q/Icccfc1c509179c3cfd59650b7917a637f9af9646 | 15:03 |
mmalchuk | and | 15:03 |
mmalchuk | https://review.opendev.org/q/I2e799290a57ebfacbc0ff9a0b1ca3dc956c513df | 15:03 |
kevko | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/914191 | 15:03 |
opendevreview | Maksim Malchuk proposed openstack/kayobe stable/zed: Adds support for custom RabbitMQ configuration. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/914447 | 15:04 |
SvenKieske | mmalchuk: I already did. I guess I'll just bring up the topic about additional cores again. seems our cores are overworked/have to many responsibilities. | 15:05 |
SvenKieske | maybe we can at least get some "backport cores"? that only can +2 backports? :D would need additional ACLs I guess.. | 15:05 |
mmalchuk | SvenKieske and we almost no cores in Kayobe | 15:05 |
SvenKieske | well sadly I have to reply that I'm not paid to work on kayobe and my free time on openstack is rather limited, I need to go outside from time to time, that's what my wife demands at least :) | 15:06 |
mmalchuk | don't have cores I mean | 15:07 |
opendevreview | Matt Crees proposed openstack/kayobe master: Use new collections in Kayobe https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/910742 | 15:07 |
SvenKieske | yeah, understood :) | 15:07 |
jovial | mmalchuk, We should bring up the topic of new kayobe cores at the PTG | 15:16 |
SvenKieske | anybody seen this bug? I didn't notice anything not working, weirdly https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla/+bug/2049716 | 15:16 |
mmalchuk | good idea, lets add to etherpad | 15:17 |
mmalchuk | SvenKieske I didn't see this issue on Jammy+Zed | 15:19 |
opendevreview | Roman Krček proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add sysctl role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/912351 | 15:29 |
opendevreview | Grzegorz Bialas proposed openstack/kolla master: adding rpm/deb support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/914529 | 15:35 |
opendevreview | Grzegorz Bialas proposed openstack/kolla master: removing spaces and debug messages https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/914532 | 15:43 |
opendevreview | Grzegorz Bialas proposed openstack/kolla master: adding rpm/deb support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/914529 | 15:55 |
opendevreview | Grzegorz Bialas proposed openstack/kolla master: adding rpm/deb support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/914529 | 16:11 |
opendevreview | Matt Crees proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: drop RMQ reconfigure step in queue migrations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/913876 | 16:18 |
opendevreview | Matt Crees proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: Only migrate RMQ queues during SLURP https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/909971 | 16:18 |
opendevreview | Matt Crees proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: RMQ: check version before enabling feature flags https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/914535 | 16:18 |
opendevreview | Grzegorz Bialas proposed openstack/kolla master: adding rpm/deb support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/914529 | 16:19 |
opendevreview | Matt Crees proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: RMQ: check version before enabling feature flags https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/914535 | 16:31 |
opendevreview | Matt Crees proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: drop RMQ reconfigure step in queue migrations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/913876 | 16:31 |
opendevreview | Matt Crees proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: Only migrate RMQ queues during SLURP https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/909971 | 16:31 |
opendevreview | Matt Crees proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: RMQ: check version before enabling feature flags https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/914535 | 16:32 |
opendevreview | Matt Crees proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: drop RMQ reconfigure step in queue migrations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/913876 | 16:32 |
opendevreview | Matt Crees proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: Only migrate RMQ queues during SLURP https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/909971 | 16:32 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [DNM] Try to turn on swift tempest smoke tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/914411 | 16:56 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla master: Check if archive is tarfile https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/914193 | 17:06 |
opendevreview | Mark Goddard proposed openstack/kayobe master: Support dict format IP routing rules on CentOS/Rocky https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/899941 | 17:06 |
opendevreview | Will Szumski proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Adds the neutron_service_limit option https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/877776 | 17:07 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Just test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/914541 | 17:09 |
opendevreview | Mark Goddard proposed openstack/ansible-collection-kolla master: docker_sdk/podman_sdk: Install packaging Python package https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/907207 | 17:17 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible master: [doc] fix typo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/914224 | 17:23 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla master: Check if archive is tarfile https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/914193 | 17:27 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla master: Check if archive is tarfile https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/914193 | 17:41 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [DNM] Try to turn on swift tempest smoke tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/914411 | 17:50 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Just test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/914541 | 17:50 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kayobe master: CI: Bump cirros images to 0.5.3 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/913976 | 17:54 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kayobe stable/2023.1: Adds support for custom RabbitMQ configuration. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/914433 | 18:35 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kayobe stable/zed: Adds support for custom RabbitMQ configuration. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/914447 | 18:35 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kayobe stable/2023.1: Fix for post configure upgrading openstacksdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/914242 | 18:58 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [DNM] Try to turn on swift tempest smoke tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/914411 | 19:14 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kayobe stable/2023.2: Fix the glob for the custom RabbitMQ configuration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/914210 | 19:17 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!