*** ozzzo1 is now known as ozzzo | 07:02 | |
opendevreview | Pierre Riteau proposed openstack/kayobe master: [DNM] Test editable installs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/894870 | 07:30 |
---|---|---|
opendevreview | Pierre Riteau proposed openstack/kayobe master: [DNM] Test editable installs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/894870 | 08:49 |
kevko | guys, can i downgrade OVN/OVS ? | 10:53 |
kevko | i mean ...by easy way ? :) | 10:53 |
mmalchuk | don't think so | 11:03 |
mnasiadka | kevko: OVN? not really, unless you scratch everything, stand up empty and sync from Neutron, but that's mayhem all over | 11:10 |
mnasiadka | OVS? should be ok, just scratch the database and ovn-controller will implement the config (and network mayhem again) :) | 11:11 |
mmalchuk | network mayhem all the way... so no easy way | 11:14 |
mnasiadka | it's easy if you don't care about the workloads | 11:20 |
mnasiadka | :) | 11:20 |
mmalchuk | this is not downgrade but install from scratch) | 11:24 |
SvenKieske | easy != simple | 11:58 |
SvenKieske | :) | 11:58 |
opendevreview | Bartosz Bezak proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add option for extra kernel modules in neutron role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894735 | 12:08 |
kevko | hmm, i need to only downgrade from 22.09 to 22.03 | 12:11 |
opendevreview | Bartosz Bezak proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: Remove redundant set/unset_cirros_image_q35_machine_type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894852 | 12:20 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: DNM: Check OVN https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894912 | 12:21 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: Change OVN jobs to voting https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894914 | 12:22 |
opendevreview | Bartosz Bezak proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: Remove redundant set/unset_cirros_image_q35_machine_type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894852 | 12:23 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/2023.1: DNM: Check OVN https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894853 | 12:28 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/2023.1: DNM: Check OVN https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894853 | 12:28 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/zed: DNM: Check OVN https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894854 | 12:29 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/zed: DNM: Check OVN https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894854 | 12:29 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/yoga: DNM: Check OVN https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894855 | 12:29 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/yoga: DNM: Check OVN https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894855 | 12:30 |
jangutter | mnasiadka: who else needs to review stable-only fixes? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894578 | 12:32 |
mnasiadka | frickler, kevko: have a moment for ^^? | 12:33 |
kevko | i will just approve, i was here yesterday when discussed | 12:33 |
kevko | it looks ok | 12:33 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/2023.1: DNM: Check OVN https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894853 | 12:33 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/zed: DNM: Check OVN https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894854 | 12:34 |
jangutter | thanks, once that's merged, I can clean it up on master branch. | 12:34 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/yoga: DNM: Check OVN https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894855 | 12:36 |
opendevreview | Bartosz Bezak proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add option for extra kernel modules in neutron role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894735 | 12:38 |
mnasiadka | mgoddard mnasiadka hrw bbezak frickler kevko SvenKieske mmalchuk gkoper jangutter jsuazo - meeting in 10 | 12:50 |
opendevreview | Juan Pablo Suazo proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Deploy Glance and Cinder Backup with S3 backend support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/844614 | 12:56 |
mnasiadka | #startmeeting kolla | 13:00 |
opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Sep 13 13:00:40 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mnasiadka. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 13:00 |
opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 13:00 |
opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'kolla' | 13:00 |
mnasiadka | #topic rollcall | 13:00 |
mnasiadka | o/ | 13:00 |
bbezak | o/ | 13:00 |
frickler | \o | 13:00 |
mattcrees | o/ | 13:00 |
jangutter | \o | 13:00 |
mmalchuk | o/ | 13:01 |
SvenKieske | o/ | 13:01 |
jsuazo | o/ | 13:02 |
ihalomi | \o | 13:02 |
mnasiadka | #topic agenda | 13:02 |
mnasiadka | * CI status | 13:02 |
mnasiadka | * Release tasks | 13:02 |
mnasiadka | * Regular stable releases (first meeting in a month) | 13:02 |
mnasiadka | * Current cycle planning | 13:02 |
mnasiadka | * Additional agenda (from whiteboard) | 13:02 |
mnasiadka | * Open discussion | 13:02 |
mnasiadka | #topic CI status | 13:02 |
mnasiadka | Overall is green I guess | 13:03 |
mnasiadka | But I think I don't like that multinode (ceph) jobs are really working nice in master | 13:03 |
mnasiadka | but they are failing in stable branches | 13:03 |
mnasiadka | the same way as they were breaking before we reconfigured RMQ to HA | 13:04 |
mnasiadka | Would we want to enable RMQ HA in tests/templates/globals-defaults for stable branches? | 13:04 |
mmalchuk | no? | 13:04 |
bbezak | in CI only? | 13:04 |
mnasiadka | in CI only | 13:05 |
mnasiadka | mmalchuk: why not? | 13:05 |
mmalchuk | oh on CI is ok | 13:05 |
mnasiadka | frickler: any thoughts? | 13:05 |
SvenKieske | seems ok | 13:05 |
mattcrees | Seems reasonable to me | 13:05 |
frickler | my other idea whether doing single node rmq only would be better | 13:05 |
frickler | but likely HA is fine, too, gives it some testing | 13:06 |
mmalchuk | frickler we need HA | 13:06 |
mmalchuk | on CI | 13:06 |
mnasiadka | let's try if switching those jobs to HA solve the issue of randomness | 13:06 |
mnasiadka | anybody willing to change it and do a couple of rechecks? | 13:06 |
bbezak | can take a look probably soonish | 13:07 |
mnasiadka | ok, bbezak wins ;) | 13:07 |
mnasiadka | #topic Release tasks | 13:07 |
mnasiadka | I didn't raise a patch for cycle highlights, will do after this meeting | 13:08 |
mnasiadka | no other release tasks seem to be waiting | 13:08 |
mnasiadka | #topic Current cycle planning | 13:08 |
mnasiadka | I don't think anybody spend time reviewing podman patches | 13:08 |
mnasiadka | and I think kevko did not update the LE Kolla patch according to reviews | 13:09 |
mnasiadka | so those two things need focus :) | 13:09 |
mnasiadka | I also proposed setting OVN jobs as voting, because it's getting more and more deployments, so I guess it would make sense to have it as voting | 13:09 |
mnasiadka | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894914 | 13:10 |
mnasiadka | SvenKieske: did you mention that td-agent needs bumping up? | 13:10 |
SvenKieske | yeah, currently figuring that one out, might not be soo trivial | 13:10 |
mmalchuk | do we switch to OVN from OVS later? | 13:11 |
mnasiadka | do you have that amount of time, or do you need help? | 13:11 |
mnasiadka | mmalchuk: that's on my backlog for working on that, we should have something beginning of next cycle | 13:11 |
mmalchuk | cool thanks | 13:11 |
SvenKieske | I'll should figure it out today or cry for help :D | 13:13 |
mnasiadka | ok :) | 13:13 |
mnasiadka | #topic Additional agenda (from whiteboard) | 13:13 |
mnasiadka | to zun or not to zun (jangutter). TL;DR, zun needs fundamental fixes to work with docker>20, etcd>3.3. Docker is a _host_ level dependency so vendoring options in the container won't work. | 13:13 |
jangutter | Does anyone have contacts with folks on the Zun team? | 13:14 |
mnasiadka | jangutter: I think it does work, but only for Ubuntu and Rocky 9 (since they still have 20.x available) | 13:14 |
mnasiadka | jangutter: there is one person I think, and he already responded on the ticket I created in Zun | 13:15 |
jangutter | yep, unless etcd is updated, of course. | 13:15 |
kevko | mnasiadka: didn't have a time | 13:15 |
kevko | :( | 13:15 |
frickler | there's only hongbin left in zun afaict, who I think has been around doing kolla patches, too | 13:15 |
mnasiadka | That's why I proposed we would copy the current etcd as etcd-zun, and upgrade etcd (that is used for everything else) | 13:15 |
mnasiadka | jangutter: if they don't shape up in C - we deprecate Zun and drop it in D (or earlier if we have to) | 13:16 |
jangutter | ah, right... running on different ports? | 13:16 |
frickler | mnasiadka: do you have a link to that ticket? | 13:16 |
mnasiadka | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/zun/+bug/2007142 | 13:16 |
frickler | maybe deprecate in B still? and undeprecate if things improve? | 13:16 |
mnasiadka | the goal is to fix it in C | 13:16 |
mnasiadka | I'm fine with deprecating in B, gives clear mandate to drop if they don't shape up | 13:16 |
jangutter | i.e. not remove, just don't run CI jobs on it? | 13:17 |
mnasiadka | jangutter: well, then the role would need to support it, right | 13:17 |
mnasiadka | deprecate means we're planning to drop, don't use it ;) | 13:17 |
jangutter | ok, I'll see what I can do with etcd-zun, can't promise too many hours. | 13:19 |
jangutter | will report back if it's feasible (migration path might be "fun") | 13:20 |
mnasiadka | well, seems like too much work | 13:22 |
jangutter | oof, yeah, bootstrap involvement: docker on the host needs access to it. | 13:23 |
mnasiadka | oh boy | 13:23 |
mnasiadka | so what's the alternative? do not update etcd or drop zun? | 13:24 |
mnasiadka | Anybody here that cares for Zun? | 13:24 |
jangutter | or pin your etcd container to a previous version of kolla? | 13:24 |
frickler | I'd favor updating etdc. maybe one can pin etcd for zun deployments? | 13:25 |
frickler | just add a reno for that, right | 13:25 |
SvenKieske | well not upgrading is not really an alternative imho | 13:25 |
SvenKieske | if we could pin for zun, that'd be nice, but I assume it's not that easy? would need a separate deployment somehow? | 13:25 |
SvenKieske | also zun relies on old docker | 13:26 |
mnasiadka | well, so maybe still a separate etcd container image for zun, and if you use zun - it's the one you get for deployment? | 13:26 |
mnasiadka | but then for such people - the upgrade will happen later | 13:26 |
mnasiadka | and they can't skip versions | 13:27 |
frickler | so ... drop zun now, restore when it gets fixed? | 13:27 |
mnasiadka | oh holy crap | 13:27 |
jangutter | that sound like a plan. etcd and etcd-3.3 | 13:27 |
mnasiadka | yes, that's what I vote for | 13:27 |
mnasiadka | drop zun | 13:27 |
frickler | and people really needing zun will need to stay on 2023.1 until then | 13:27 |
mmalchuk | +1 | 13:27 |
jangutter | any workaround is just going to postpone the inevitable, if not make it worse :-( | 13:27 |
mnasiadka | yeah, drop now, if they backport support for new docker into 2023.1 - we can revert | 13:27 |
SvenKieske | should we maybe announce that separately via ML? | 13:28 |
SvenKieske | maybe someone who cares is encourage to fix zun earlier then ;) | 13:28 |
mnasiadka | jangutter: can you please send a mail to openstack-discuss that we are going to drop zun support for that reason, and the plan is to revert the drop once Zun supports new Docker version - because we can't be running this etcd version forever? :) | 13:28 |
mnasiadka | let's wait a week if any massacre happens and start dropping | 13:29 |
SvenKieske | +1 | 13:29 |
jangutter | will do, adding that if zun gains support it will be considered for the stable 2023.1 branch? | 13:29 |
mnasiadka | yes, something like that - we should probably drop it in kolla-ansible in a way that the Ansible inventory groups stay there, so it's easy to revert (without breaking anything) | 13:30 |
mnasiadka | and if they don't shape up - we drop the remnants in C | 13:30 |
jangutter | :thumbsup: | 13:30 |
mnasiadka | ok, let's hope case solved for now | 13:31 |
mnasiadka | Tap as a Service installation and configuration (jsuazo) | 13:31 |
mnasiadka | Did we get to any conclusion last time? :) | 13:32 |
jsuazo | I have a clearer picture as to why we are touching the upper constraints, which I addressed in the kolla proposal | 13:32 |
mnasiadka | Yeah, I see that | 13:33 |
mnasiadka | Question is if we should be installing it from a tarball, or honor the u-c | 13:33 |
jsuazo | TL;DR the pinned version is not working on X and above (tested versions), we tested de latest release, 11.0.0, which seems to work fine | 13:34 |
mmalchuk | afaik we need bump X version in u-c | 13:34 |
mnasiadka | release 11.0.0 is in master u-c | 13:34 |
jsuazo | We managed to add the plugin as a neutron addition from git, the branch of the source could be changed to the correct one, currently we are overriding the source to master on deployments | 13:35 |
mnasiadka | we are not considering to add that to any of the stable branches (no backports) | 13:35 |
mnasiadka | (it's a feature) | 13:35 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/zed: CI: add q35 hardware machine type to tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894582 | 13:35 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/2023.1: CI: add q35 hardware machine type to tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894581 | 13:35 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/yoga: CI: add q35 hardware machine type to tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894583 | 13:35 |
mmalchuk | so honor u-c should be fine | 13:36 |
mnasiadka | frickler: any controversial opinions? ;-) (apart the ones, that who needs TaaS or is that project alive) | 13:37 |
mnasiadka | up until now removing packages from u-c was rather exception, not a way of working | 13:37 |
jsuazo | mnasiadka: Should i propose a change to the u-c in X then ? (and remove the u-c editing from the proposal) | 13:38 |
mnasiadka | in Xena? | 13:38 |
mmalchuk | jsuazo no since it is feature | 13:39 |
mnasiadka | (changing u-c in stable branches is not something is going to pass from my perspective) | 13:39 |
mmalchuk | will not backport to xena | 13:39 |
jsuazo | ok, got it, will update the proposal then | 13:39 |
mnasiadka | you can backport the taas feature in your downstream branches and override the u-c, but I have a feeling taas is there for some reason | 13:39 |
mnasiadka | unless requirements team is happy with removing tap-as-a-service from u-c, then we can rework the build to use tarballs | 13:40 |
SvenKieske | td-agent is meeh, the repo installation changed to a good old "curl $internet | bash" -> voila you got a new repo under /etc/apt/sources.d/ :( | 13:40 |
jsuazo | We actually had a tarball installation initially, but my team didn´t like it that much :( | 13:42 |
mnasiadka | SvenKieske: oh boy, I'll try to have a look in mythical free time | 13:42 |
SvenKieske | and everything is now called "fluentd*" instead of "td-agent*" at least that can be mass changed I guess | 13:42 |
SvenKieske | https://docs.fluentd.org/installation/install-by-deb | 13:42 |
SvenKieske | https://www.fluentd.org/blog/upgrade-td-agent-v4-to-v5 | 13:42 |
mnasiadka | mhm | 13:42 |
mnasiadka | let's discuss that next week when I'll know more about it :) | 13:43 |
mnasiadka | S3 backend support for Glance and Cinder-Buckup (jsuazo) | 13:43 |
SvenKieske | I guess it's doable, will try to extract URLs for gpg keys et all from that shell script :) | 13:43 |
mnasiadka | jsuazo: I think I commented on this patch today, do you need any help? | 13:43 |
jsuazo | i would appreciate if you gave the kolla-ansible TaaS proposal a look | 13:44 |
mmalchuk | me too as always add some comments | 13:44 |
mnasiadka | jsuazo: I'll have a look on the k-a side as well this week | 13:44 |
SvenKieske | have a link? I know I saw it somewhere but it got lost in the torrent of other tabs :D | 13:44 |
jsuazo | mnasiadka No help needed, Im keeping an eye and comments and trying to address them as I see them | 13:44 |
mnasiadka | kolla-ansible: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/885417 | 13:45 |
mnasiadka | SvenKieske: ^^ | 13:45 |
mnasiadka | ok then | 13:45 |
mnasiadka | #topic Open discussion | 13:45 |
mnasiadka | anybody anything? | 13:45 |
mmalchuk | orphans-backports | 13:45 |
mmalchuk | https://review.opendev.org/q/I3ca4e10508c26b752412789502ceb917ecb4dbeb | 13:45 |
mmalchuk | https://review.opendev.org/q/I0401bfc03cd31d72c5a2ae0a111889d5c29a8aa2 | 13:46 |
mmalchuk | https://review.opendev.org/q/I169e51c0f5c691518ada1837990b5bdd2a3d1481 | 13:46 |
mmalchuk | https://review.opendev.org/q/Ief8dca4e27197c9576e215cbd960da75f6fdc20c | 13:46 |
mmalchuk | some merged, some one | 13:46 |
mmalchuk | and kayobe reviews | 13:46 |
mmalchuk | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/861397 | 13:46 |
mmalchuk | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/879554 | 13:46 |
mmalchuk | thats all from my side | 13:46 |
kevko | guys | 13:47 |
kevko | 1. ovn/ovs redeployed ..not working :( ... | 13:47 |
kevko | 2. Can anyone check podman kolla patch ? locally working ..zuul is failing while building SOME images | 13:47 |
mnasiadka | I should have some more time next week | 13:48 |
mnasiadka | I can have a look around podman kolla patch | 13:48 |
SvenKieske | that would be great, I'm also out of ideas there, and I looked at the logs.. (maybe the wrong way) | 13:48 |
kevko | mnasiadka: there is no reason to not work ..but it's not in zuul ...locally working like a charm | 13:49 |
frickler | if all other debugging fails, we can hold a node and check what is going on there | 13:50 |
mnasiadka | kevko: well, basically if it fails on upgrade jobs, so it's checkin out previous release code - but what do I know :) | 13:50 |
kevko | but it is failing on kolla build | 13:51 |
kevko | so it is not related to upgrade job | 13:51 |
kevko | because upgrade job is just deploy -> build images -> upgrade | 13:51 |
kevko | and it is failing on build images | 13:51 |
kevko | everything is built OK ..but not glance,horizon,eutron | 13:51 |
mnasiadka | I saw pip is failing or something similar | 13:52 |
mnasiadka | but it's working ok on all other jobs, just not upgrade :) | 13:52 |
mnasiadka | anyway - I unfortunately need to run - feel free to resolve that issue while I'm gone :) | 13:53 |
mnasiadka | Thank you all for coming | 13:53 |
mnasiadka | #endmeet | 13:53 |
mnasiadka | #endmeeting | 13:53 |
opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Sep 13 13:53:43 2023 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 13:53 |
opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2023/kolla.2023-09-13-13.00.html | 13:53 |
opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2023/kolla.2023-09-13-13.00.txt | 13:53 |
opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2023/kolla.2023-09-13-13.00.log.html | 13:53 |
mmalchuk | thanks mnasiadka | 13:53 |
SvenKieske | thanks all | 13:55 |
opendevreview | Maksim Malchuk proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/zed: Prevent libvirtd reload when only generating config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/893764 | 14:12 |
opendevreview | Maksim Malchuk proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/yoga: Prevent libvirtd reload when only generating config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/893765 | 14:12 |
opendevreview | Maksim Malchuk proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/2023.1: Prevent libvirtd reload when only generating config https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/893763 | 14:14 |
opendevreview | Célestin Matte proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: README: link to the meetings page directly https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894930 | 14:44 |
sahid | o/ | 14:48 |
sahid | quick question | 14:48 |
sahid | how to set an option for rabbitmq | 14:48 |
sahid | I have noticed a template rabbitmq.conf.j2 in kolla-ansible | 14:49 |
mmalchuk | quick answer: add them into the config file | 14:49 |
sahid | hum... I thought that was working for services only | 14:49 |
sahid | i will make a try | 14:49 |
sahid | thank you | 14:49 |
mmalchuk | as you can see ansible/roles/rabbitmq/tasks/config.yml | 14:50 |
mmalchuk | task: Copying over rabbitmq.conf | 14:50 |
mmalchuk | rabbitmq.conf is a template | 14:51 |
SvenKieske | depending on the setting some stuff needs to go into the erlang config | 14:51 |
mmalchuk | you can place your own template in the node_custom_config | 14:51 |
sahid | yes that one looks to be related to rabbitmq.conf | 14:51 |
sahid | so i'm safe I guess | 14:51 |
SvenKieske | there's also advanced_config.j2 template, some settings need to go there | 14:52 |
mmalchuk | also you can use kolla-ansible configuration and set rabbitmq_extra_config | 14:52 |
SvenKieske | rabbitmq has a lot of config stuff, with varying degrees of docs around them :) | 14:52 |
mmalchuk | but this is only in master and antelope | 14:53 |
mmalchuk | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/865434 | 14:53 |
SvenKieske | this helps, most of the time: https://www.rabbitmq.com/configure.html | 14:54 |
SvenKieske | specifically: https://www.rabbitmq.com/configure.html#means-of-configuration | 14:54 |
SvenKieske | you'll work your way through it, it's much easier than in the past :) | 14:56 |
opendevreview | Will Szumski proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Support exposing prometheus_server externally https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/828695 | 15:11 |
opendevreview | Will Szumski proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Support exposing prometheus_server externally https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/828695 | 15:28 |
opendevreview | Verification of a change to openstack/kolla master failed: Revert "macros/pip: revert to old setuptools way" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/894600 | 15:36 |
opendevreview | Verification of a change to openstack/kayobe master failed: Complete Skydive removal and Skyline addition https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/894799 | 15:36 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/2023.1: debian: fix some debian jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894578 | 15:50 |
opendevreview | Will Szumski proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Support exposing prometheus_server externally https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/828695 | 15:51 |
opendevreview | Will Szumski proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Support exposing prometheus_server externally https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/828695 | 15:55 |
opendevreview | Jan Gutter proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: debian: Remove kolla-ansible-debian-zun job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894573 | 15:57 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/yoga: Use better default bind address for ironic-tftp https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/893421 | 17:27 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla stable/yoga: Revert "Disable build of Gnocchi containers" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/890540 | 17:27 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/yoga: Fix designate-producers not running properly https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/893400 | 17:27 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/zed: Fix designate-producers not running properly https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/893399 | 17:27 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/2023.1: Fix designate-producers not running properly https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/893398 | 17:27 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: Remove redundant set/unset_cirros_image_q35_machine_type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894852 | 17:27 |
opendevreview | Sven Kieske proposed openstack/kolla master: bump td-agent lts from v4 to v5 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/894948 | 17:41 |
opendevreview | Bartosz Bezak proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/2023.1: CI: Remove redundant set/unset_cirros_image_q35_machine_type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894858 | 17:51 |
opendevreview | Bartosz Bezak proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/zed: CI: Remove redundant set/unset_cirros_image_q35_machine_type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894859 | 17:51 |
opendevreview | Bartosz Bezak proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/yoga: CI: Remove redundant set/unset_cirros_image_q35_machine_type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/894860 | 17:52 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla master: Revert "macros/pip: revert to old setuptools way" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/894600 | 22:33 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kayobe master: Complete Skydive removal and Skyline addition https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/894799 | 23:10 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!