gmann | mnasiadka: frickler: mgoddard: can we merge this if all good in this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/870879/4 | 02:18 |
---|---|---|
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/ansible-collection-kolla master: CI: Add Kayobe RL9 jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/871681 | 07:08 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/ansible-collection-kolla master: Debian/Ubuntu: handle APT keys in proper way https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/871610 | 07:39 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/ansible-collection-kolla master: Debian/Ubuntu: handle APT keys in proper way https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/871610 | 07:42 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/ansible-collection-kolla master: Debian/Ubuntu: handle APT keys in proper way https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/871610 | 07:43 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/ansible-collection-kolla master: CI: Add Kayobe RL9 jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/871681 | 07:46 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/ansible-collection-kolla master: Debian/Ubuntu: handle APT keys in proper way https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/871610 | 07:58 |
kevko | mnasiadka: I don't think this will work | 08:01 |
mnasiadka | kevko: works on a local Jammy install | 08:01 |
kevko | mnasiadka: really ? asc format ? | 08:01 |
mnasiadka | yes, it's dumb, but it works | 08:02 |
kevko | mnasiadka: local yammy | 08:04 |
kevko | Fetched 133 MB in 25s (5,352 kB/s) | 08:04 |
kevko | Reading package lists... Done | 08:04 |
kevko | Building dependency tree... Done | 08:04 |
kevko | Reading state information... Done | 08:04 |
kevko | 60 packages can be upgraded. Run 'apt list --upgradable' to see them. | 08:04 |
kevko | N: Skipping acquire of configured file 'stable/binary-i386/Packages' as repository 'https://download.docker.com/linux/ubuntu jammy InRelease' doesn't support architecture 'i386' | 08:04 |
kevko | root@pixla:/home/michalarbet/ultimum/git/upstream/ansible-collection-kolla# cat /etc/apt/sources.list.d/docker.list | 08:05 |
kevko | deb [signed-by=/etc/apt/keyrings/docker.asc] https://download.docker.com/linux/ubuntu jammy stable | 08:05 |
kevko | mnasiadka: let's see ...i have another revision if it will not work | 08:06 |
kevko | mnasiadka: from zuul -> Destination /etc/apt/keyrings is not writable", | 08:10 |
mnasiadka | guess it needs become | 08:10 |
kevko | mnasiadka: yeah | 08:11 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/ansible-collection-kolla master: Debian/Ubuntu: handle APT keys in proper way https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/871610 | 08:18 |
hrw | morning | 08:21 |
hrw | kevko: are you moving functionality present in kolla to a-c-kolla? | 08:22 |
hrw | yeah, kind of same | 08:22 |
kevko | hrw: no, I was trying wallaby (where ansible/roles/baremetal is present - and this task is also present there) ..and noticed that this should be fixed as it is deprecated, but when i was trying to find that task in master i just realized that this *was* moved to ansible-collection (role baremetal) | 08:23 |
kevko | so i was going to fix a-c-kolla :) | 08:24 |
hrw | kevko: template/repos.yaml rewrite was called similar way | 08:24 |
hrw | kevko: I would rather use template and create docker.source file | 08:25 |
kevko | hrw: yeah, i've stolen your git commit message :D :D :D | 08:25 |
hrw | with this multiline format of repo | 08:25 |
hrw | anyway, your way works too ;d | 08:25 |
mnasiadka | kevko: I think you went from asc to gpg once again :) | 08:28 |
mnasiadka | anyway around a-c-kolla - these three are waiting: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/871645 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/871646 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/871681 | 08:29 |
hrw | both asc and gpg works | 08:31 |
mnasiadka | gpg needs dearmor on docker key, asc doesn't ;) | 08:34 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/ansible-collection-kolla master: docker: Add docker_systemd_reload functionality https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/871293 | 08:43 |
mnasiadka | well, actually seems .gpg works as well | 09:15 |
kevko | mnasiadka: hmm, it is opposite no ? | 09:16 |
mnasiadka | well, on my local jammy instance, .gpg did not work, .asc did, but if this works in CI, maybe I did something wrong ;) | 09:16 |
kevko | asc is -> "A ASCII-armored representation of key " - so you need dearmor , .gpg is GNU Privacy Guard public keyring file, binary format. | 09:18 |
kevko | and you need to have binary format i think | 09:18 |
kevko | mnasiadka: well, maybe apt is recongnizing filetype depends on ".gpg" or ".asc" and then use it .. | 09:20 |
kevko | i thought that there is needed to have binary format ..that's the reason why i used --dearmor ..if .asc did the trick ..it's ok probably | 09:22 |
mnasiadka | well, the current version of the patch works in CI, so I don't see why it shouldn't work anywhere else | 09:22 |
hrw | apt goes by extension, yes | 09:38 |
hrw | that's why docker/base/Dockerfile.j2 has key for it in table of keys | 09:38 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/yoga: Add CentOS Stream 9 / Rocky Linux 9 host support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/864920 | 09:41 |
kevko | hrw: mnasiadka: it's working ..i am just saying there is ASCI armored file downloaded from download.docker.com/linux/{distro}/gpg ..and its name is .gpg ..which is not correct ..so i don't understand how it works :D | 09:41 |
hrw | ah, ok | 09:41 |
mnasiadka | lol | 09:42 |
mnasiadka | so should it be named .asc? :D | 09:42 |
kevko | but then it is not working i think | 09:42 |
kevko | let me try :D | 09:42 |
kevko | i think it should :D | 09:45 |
kevko | https://asecuritysite.com/rsa/pgp1 < format | 09:45 |
kevko | downloaded docker key -> https://paste.openstack.org/show/bOTBxeu6MvEosl6fkemq | 09:46 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/ansible-collection-kolla master: Debian/Ubuntu: handle APT keys in proper way https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/871610 | 09:49 |
kevko | i am detailistic :) | 09:49 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-collection-kolla master: CI: Rename source jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/871645 | 09:55 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-collection-kolla master: CI: Add Kayobe RL9 jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/871681 | 09:56 |
opendevreview | Verification of a change to openstack/ansible-collection-kolla master failed: CI: add aarch64 kolla-ansible job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/871646 | 09:56 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/ansible-collection-kolla master: CI: add aarch64 kolla-ansible job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/871646 | 10:02 |
opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/ansible-collection-kolla master: Debian/Ubuntu: handle APT keys in proper way https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/871610 | 10:02 |
kevko | hrw: what about +2 and +2 from you for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/865434 simple patch ? :P | 10:03 |
kevko | +w | 10:04 |
hrw | done | 10:04 |
mnasiadka | ok, kevko - can you followup with some docs? :) | 10:05 |
kevko | mnasiadka: for which patch | 10:12 |
kevko | mnasiadka: do you mean rabbitmq options ? :D ..i can ..i am not goog in docs :D and i hate it ..but yeah probably I can :D | 10:13 |
mnasiadka | yeah, for rmq :) | 10:19 |
kevko | mnasiadka: i will take a look | 10:43 |
kevko | mnasiadka: btw, if you have a time ..i have another patchset which is resolving long-term bug in kolla_docker module :P | 10:44 |
kevko | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/870798 | 10:44 |
mnasiadka | kevko: will have a look, but I'm thinking if we could have any tests that would make sure it's correct now ;) | 10:49 |
kevko | mnasiadka: we probably should have something for testing ..i've tested on my built environment (btw i found this bug because I realized that heat-engines are killed because even if graceful_timeout is configured in k-a it' ignored because of default timeout in a module ...) | 10:51 |
kevko | mnasiadka: and this is global problem in k-a ..there are several containers killed after 10sec and they are not waiting for 60sec ..only 10 sec ...this is big problem i think | 10:52 |
mnasiadka | well, we have a bunch of kolla_docker tests | 11:02 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla stable/yoga: Add support for CentOS Stream 9 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/869906 | 11:19 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add ability to configure rabbitmq https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/865434 | 11:20 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-collection-kolla master: CI: add aarch64 kolla-ansible job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/871646 | 11:20 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: show coverage report in job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/871471 | 11:20 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla stable/yoga: Add support for CentOS Stream 9 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/869906 | 12:50 |
mnasiadka | mgoddard mnasiadka hrw bbezak frickler kevko - meeting in 9 | 13:51 |
kevko | ok, then i am going for cigarette :P | 13:52 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla stable/yoga: Add support for CentOS Stream 9 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/869906 | 13:54 |
mnasiadka | #startmeeting kolla | 14:00 |
opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Jan 25 14:00:00 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mnasiadka. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'kolla' | 14:00 |
mnasiadka | #topic rollcall | 14:00 |
mnasiadka | o/ | 14:00 |
mhiner | \o | 14:01 |
scottsol | o/ | 14:01 |
matfechner | o/ | 14:01 |
kevko | \o/ | 14:01 |
mmalchuk | \o | 14:01 |
frickler | o/ | 14:02 |
hrw | /o\ | 14:02 |
ebbex | o/ | 14:02 |
bbezak | \o | 14:02 |
mnasiadka | #topic agenda | 14:03 |
mnasiadka | * CI status | 14:03 |
mnasiadka | * Release tasks | 14:03 |
mnasiadka | * Regular stable releases (first meeting in a month) | 14:03 |
mnasiadka | * Current cycle planning | 14:03 |
mnasiadka | * Additional agenda (from whiteboard) | 14:03 |
mnasiadka | * Open discussion | 14:03 |
mnasiadka | #topic CI Status | 14:03 |
mnasiadka | So, I've fixed some a-c-kolla missing CI jobs after renames | 14:04 |
mnasiadka | I'm a bit concerned about Rocky Ironic CI jobs issues, both in K-A and Kayobe | 14:05 |
mnasiadka | I'll write that down on the whiteboard, because they are failing not every time, but often | 14:06 |
mnasiadka | #topic Release tasks | 14:06 |
mnasiadka | I don't think we have any | 14:06 |
mnasiadka | #topic Current cycle planning | 14:06 |
mnasiadka | So, I think it's time to merge the systemd patch in kolla-ansible | 14:06 |
mnasiadka | I tried it out, seems to be working ok, and I have a feeling if we don't merge it - we'll postpone it again and again | 14:06 |
mnasiadka | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/816724 | 14:07 |
mnasiadka | frickler, kevko, hrw, bbezak - wdyt? | 14:07 |
frickler | trial by fire, sounds reasonable | 14:07 |
kevko | let's do it | 14:07 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible master: Adding optional delay between l3 agent restarts https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/862916 | 14:08 |
mnasiadka | We still have quite a couple of months before release, so it's time I guess | 14:08 |
bbezak | master is for testing isn't? | 14:08 |
bbezak | :) | 14:08 |
mnasiadka | And we would make mhiner happy | 14:08 |
mhiner | very much :D | 14:08 |
hrw | always can revert | 14:08 |
mnasiadka | yup | 14:08 |
mnasiadka | Added my +2, another trial by fire participant needed. | 14:09 |
kevko | i gave also - merging :) | 14:10 |
mnasiadka | Great, one thing over the line, let's see if it breaks :) | 14:11 |
mnasiadka | mhiner: I see there are some other patches that you could refresh/rebase now, and we could tackle them one by one | 14:11 |
mnasiadka | The other long awaited patch is Let's Encrypt, but I didn't have time yet to do some proper testing of that. | 14:12 |
kevko | another candidate for trial by a fire ? :D | 14:13 |
mhiner | yes, they deal with preparation for podman introduction | 14:13 |
mnasiadka | not yet, for systemd patch I did have a look on a local env :) | 14:13 |
mnasiadka | for let's encrypt it needs to wait a bit, unless other cores are happy to give a meaningful review to it | 14:14 |
kevko | i really want to test letsencypt on local env (but currently i am reworking my pipelines to build en ENV ...but i am almost done ... so i will check it - i hope) | 14:14 |
mnasiadka | good | 14:15 |
mnasiadka | ok, let's go further | 14:15 |
mnasiadka | #topic Open discussion | 14:16 |
mnasiadka | I have a small question | 14:16 |
mnasiadka | is there a reason kolla-ansible-debian-aarch64 is not voting? | 14:16 |
hrw | no idea | 14:16 |
kevko | maybe because smallest group of people who is using k-a on aarch64 ? | 14:17 |
mnasiadka | well, if it's reliable, and I think it is - we should mark it as voting | 14:17 |
mnasiadka | and we should at least try to not break it :) | 14:17 |
mnasiadka | (with non-voting I have a feeling we don't really care) | 14:18 |
mnasiadka | Does anybody care enough to mark it as voting? | 14:18 |
hrw | let me | 14:18 |
mnasiadka | good | 14:19 |
kevko | don't care | 14:19 |
mmalchuk | according Support Matrix | 14:19 |
mmalchuk | we support Debian | 14:19 |
opendevreview | Marcin Juszkiewicz proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: make debian/aarch64 voting https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/871732 | 14:20 |
mmalchuk | so it should vote | 14:20 |
hrw | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/871348 needs brave person for trivial change | 14:20 |
mnasiadka | debian x86 is voting, so aarch64 should as well | 14:20 |
mnasiadka | as long as we have any CI infrastructure to test it :) | 14:20 |
hrw | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/869168 is aarch64 doc update which needs review/work | 14:20 |
hrw | mnasiadka: opendev got new aarch64 nodes iirc | 14:21 |
frickler | yes, working since today | 14:21 |
frickler | though it may actually be only one physical node I think | 14:21 |
mnasiadka | hrw: doc update seems ok, let's merge it | 14:22 |
mnasiadka | hrw: from another front - I think you've tried with multiarch images once? | 14:22 |
hrw | mnasiadka: nope | 14:22 |
frickler | on another note: I'll be holidaying the next two weeks and plan to be mostly offline. so don't ping me, I'll ping you ;) | 14:22 |
hrw | frickler: have fun | 14:22 |
frickler | someone else will have to take care of stable releases next week, too | 14:22 |
hrw | who goes to fosdem? | 14:23 |
kevko | what is fosdem ? | 14:24 |
hrw | fosdem is two weeks conference done in 2 days | 14:25 |
mnasiadka | google died? :) https://fosdem.org | 14:25 |
mnasiadka | ok, any other topics? | 14:26 |
* hrw not | 14:26 | |
* kevko not | 14:27 | |
frickler | maybe quickly mention the recent nova+cinder vuln | 14:27 |
frickler | in case anyone missed it | 14:27 |
kevko | link ? | 14:28 |
mmalchuk | which one? | 14:28 |
frickler | https://launchpad.net/bugs/1996188 | 14:29 |
mnasiadka | #link https://security.openstack.org/ossa/OSSA-2023-002.html | 14:29 |
frickler | and that one, yes | 14:29 |
mnasiadka | the patch backports in relevant projects are underway | 14:30 |
mmalchuk | wow | 14:30 |
frickler | not affecting kolla directly, but important to fix IMO for anyone having 3rd party accessing their cloud | 14:31 |
kevko | woow | 14:31 |
mmalchuk | thanks for info) | 14:31 |
spatel | Sorry to hijack thread but i have quick question, I am upgrading kolla from Xena to Yoga and i want to upgrade one components at a time (Ex: first keystone then nova and then neutron one by one. what are the best ways?) | 14:35 |
frickler | guess that's it? | 14:35 |
kevko | spatel: use -t keystone etc | 14:35 |
spatel | Hmm! nice.. let me give it a try Thanks :) | 14:37 |
mnasiadka | Ok, I think that's enough :) | 14:38 |
mnasiadka | Thanks for coming! | 14:38 |
mnasiadka | #endmeeting | 14:38 |
opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Jan 25 14:38:34 2023 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:38 |
opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2023/kolla.2023-01-25-14.00.html | 14:38 |
opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2023/kolla.2023-01-25-14.00.txt | 14:38 |
opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2023/kolla.2023-01-25-14.00.log.html | 14:38 |
mnasiadka | spatel: if you use OVN, then you need to upgrade all ovn components in one run | 14:38 |
mmalchuk | thx mnasiadka | 14:39 |
frickler | thx for chairing mnasiadka | 14:39 |
spatel | I am using OVN | 14:39 |
spatel | so i need to do -i multinode upgrade? | 14:39 |
mnasiadka | yes, just make sure ALL hosts with ovn components are upgraded in one run, because old ovn-controller can't connect to newer OVN-NB/SB databases | 14:40 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: ovn: Improve clustering https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/868929 | 14:41 |
mnasiadka | hrw, frickler, bbezak: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/871610 if you have time :) | 14:48 |
hrw | done | 14:49 |
spatel | mnasiadka oh!! | 14:50 |
spatel | Thank you! for heads up | 14:50 |
mnasiadka | spatel: https://docs.ovn.org/en/latest/intro/install/ovn-upgrades.html | 14:52 |
spatel | Hmm! that is interesting, what if someone has 300 compute nodes in that case we have to do all in same time? | 14:55 |
kevko | spatel: --limit host :) ? | 14:55 |
spatel | But if we upgrade controller nodes then all compute nodes won't talk to controller until we upgrade them correct? | 14:56 |
spatel | As per mnasiadka mentioned that it should be all in ovn case | 14:56 |
kevko | spatel: well, it depends on what component you are upgrading | 14:57 |
spatel | Other components doesn't care about backward compatibility correct? only OVN care about running same version across the board | 14:58 |
spatel | In current environment i am doing single node per day instead doing upgrade all same day. so i pick few compute nodes today and then other next day and so no.. | 14:59 |
kevko | spatel: it depends ..you have to have some experiences ..for example rabbitmq is also needed to upgrade at once ..because of erlang/rabbitmq | 14:59 |
spatel | But rabbit is just 3 node so easy enough. | 14:59 |
kevko | spatel: for example neutron control plane +1 ver and agents -1 ver is compatible ..also nova-control plane and nova-compute plane | 14:59 |
spatel | We have 325 nodes in cluster and i can't upgrade everything in single day. that is my issue | 15:00 |
kevko | well, i am not expert in ovn (we are still using ovs ) ... but maybe you should split your cloud into smaller ones ? | 15:01 |
kevko | (if there is really no option to upgrade once by once ) | 15:01 |
spatel | kevko haha i have 5 cloud and all has around 200 to 300 nodes. how much i should split :) | 15:02 |
mnasiadka | spatel: yes, correct - and ovn-controller will drop all rules - so networking will stop ;-) | 15:18 |
mnasiadka | spatel: so if you want to split, you need to do ovn-controllers first, and then the SB/NB databases (+ northd) | 15:18 |
spatel | mnasiadka you are saying first upgrade all compute nodes running ovn-controller and then go to nb/sb upgrade correct? | 15:19 |
mnasiadka | spatel: if you want to split them - yes, but I think safest is just to run with -t openvswitch,ovn on all hosts (if you want to split by service) | 15:20 |
spatel | does it going to pause traffic for sometime? | 15:23 |
opendevreview | Verification of a change to openstack/kolla-ansible master failed: Add systemd container control https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/816724 | 15:24 |
mnasiadka | spatel: no, it should be fine | 15:25 |
spatel | hmm okiee | 15:26 |
opendevreview | Verification of a change to openstack/ansible-collection-kolla master failed: Debian/Ubuntu: handle APT keys in proper way https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/871610 | 15:43 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla master: Add util-linux to centos base packages https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/871738 | 15:44 |
mnasiadka | hrw: I got tired of the message that /usr/sbin/nologin is missing ^^ | 15:46 |
hrw | mnasiadka: did you also changed order of RUN calls? | 15:46 |
hrw | mnasiadka: first install, then create users | 15:46 |
hrw | no, you did not | 15:47 |
mnasiadka | argh right | 15:47 |
hrw | so message is still there | 15:47 |
mnasiadka | let me fix that | 15:47 |
hrw | I was looking at it one day and forgot to send. | 15:47 |
hrw | did reset since then | 15:47 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla master: Add util-linux to centos base packages https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/871738 | 15:48 |
mnasiadka | argh, wrong lin | 15:49 |
mnasiadka | e | 15:49 |
mnasiadka | :) | 15:49 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla master: Add util-linux to centos base packages https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/871738 | 15:50 |
hrw | +1 | 16:02 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla master: Add util-linux to centos base packages https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/871738 | 16:22 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla stable/yoga: Add support for CentOS Stream 9 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/869906 | 16:32 |
spatel | mnasiadka should we document this important notice in upgrade doc? related OVN limitation when it comes to upgrade large environment? like -t openvswitch,ovn | 16:45 |
mnasiadka | Why not, post a patch and we'll review it :) | 16:46 |
spatel | +1 | 16:48 |
spatel | mnasiadka quick question again if i do kolla-ansible -i multinode pull (does it going to pull latest images everyday?) | 16:49 |
spatel | what if i want to pull specific image like nova-compute ? | 16:50 |
mnasiadka | you can use -t nova to pull only nova images to required hosts | 16:51 |
mnasiadka | but yes, if you use quay.io - you'll get new image every day | 16:52 |
mnasiadka | for stable results, you should have your own local registry - and either pull images from quay and push into that local registry, or build Kolla images on your own | 16:52 |
spatel | I am using quay.io so i am sure it will pull new images. | 17:05 |
spatel | I can push images in local registry with custom tags correct? | 17:05 |
spatel | just trying to understand how useful to have local registry, how does kolla pick images from local registry. assuming based on tag in global.yml (openstack_release: "yoga") | 17:07 |
spatel | or openstack_release: foobar | 17:07 |
mnasiadka | spatel: yes, you can even have a tag per service (like neutron) or even per container | 17:12 |
mnasiadka | neutron_tag | 17:12 |
spatel | nice! let me try to play with it. | 17:14 |
spatel | for patching etc.. i have to re-build images right? are there any doc related how to patch images and re-pack? | 17:15 |
mnasiadka | everything is in the docs (https://docs.openstack.org/kolla/latest/admin/image-building.html) | 17:17 |
spatel | +1 | 17:19 |
spatel | I did just run pull on my lab machine and it download images but with <none> tag, is that a correct behavior? - https://paste.opendev.org/show/bpXvqMRtYebkl2JVLp8b/ | 17:26 |
opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla stable/yoga: Add support for CentOS Stream 9 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/869906 | 17:44 |
mnasiadka | spatel: old images get none tag | 17:49 |
spatel | got it so old images automatically take none tag. | 17:50 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add systemd container control https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/816724 | 18:43 |
guesswhat[m] | Hey, openstack application credential create test --role load-balancer_member fails to https://pastebin.com/raw/ikNSUY6G ,is it kolla or openstack default? How can I change it? Thanks | 21:00 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!