| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla master: curl: Add retries https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/853398 | 05:10 |
|---|---|---|
| *** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 06:35 | |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: add basic CentOS Stream 9 / Rocky Linux 9 support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/839715 | 07:25 |
| mnasiadka | morning | 08:21 |
| wuchunyang | moring | 08:43 |
| opendevreview | Mark Goddard proposed openstack/kayobe master: Fix use of become_user by installing acl package https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/853424 | 10:30 |
| opendevreview | Will Szumski proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Introduce variables for cinder backend names https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/853006 | 11:40 |
| opendevreview | Ivan Halomi proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Adding support of podman deployment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/799229 | 11:42 |
| spatel | does kolla has supoort of skyline GUI ? | 12:22 |
| mnasiadka | have they finally made a release? | 12:43 |
| *** matt__ is now known as matfechner | 12:45 | |
| frickler | mnasiadka: zed-2 at least https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/850361 , but likely we should still wait for a non-pre-release | 12:58 |
| mnasiadka | yes, I remember we had to remove the code in Y and remove the images, because they did not make a release | 12:58 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 13:18 | |
| opendevreview | Will Szumski proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Introduce variables for cinder backend names https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/853006 | 13:21 |
| opendevreview | Will Szumski proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Introduce variables for cinder backend names https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/853006 | 13:25 |
| spatel | mnasiadka ah! | 13:45 |
| spatel | mnasiadka I have one more question, if i create production cluster using kolla-ansible then should i be creating image repo or i can go without that? | 13:46 |
| mnasiadka | ah no, that was venus that got reverted | 13:46 |
| spatel | I have only 5 node in cluster | 13:46 |
| mnasiadka | skyline changes are in merge conflict and not updated since some time | 13:47 |
| mnasiadka | spatel: you can use the images from docker hub/quay.io | 13:47 |
| spatel | what are the advantage of creating local container repo? | 13:47 |
| spatel | why don't people use hub/quay.io for all deployment? | 13:48 |
| mnasiadka | advantage is less internet traffic (or faster downloads from local registry) and you can build your own containers with your own customisations | 13:49 |
| rockey | advantages of utilizing your own registry for images is on-site distribution, full control over when/where images were built and the good system for customization in place for images | 13:49 |
| mnasiadka | docker hub has download limits | 13:49 |
| mnasiadka | as rockey mentioned - probably control over your images is the best :) | 13:49 |
| rockey | just the fact of testing your images before rolling out in production is a good thing imo :) | 13:50 |
| spatel | oh! got it.. got it.. so only advantage of internet speed and customization :) | 13:50 |
| mnasiadka | mgoddard mnasiadka hrw yoctozepto bbezak parallax Fl1nt frickler adrian-a - Kolla meeting in 10 minutes | 13:50 |
| rockey | spatel: not "only advantage", but imo the biggest ones | 13:50 |
| spatel | :) | 13:50 |
| spatel | Is there any high availability for that or standalone repo should be fine.. | 13:51 |
| rockey | spatel: for instance, i run scans on images which is built and continuously scanning them for risks/CVE's | 13:51 |
| spatel | rockey +1 | 13:52 |
| *** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 13:53 | |
| opendevreview | Mark Goddard proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/wallaby: gnocchi: fix external ceph integration when gnocchi-statsd is disabled https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/853439 | 14:00 |
| mnasiadka | #startmeeting kolla | 14:01 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Aug 17 14:01:29 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mnasiadka. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:01 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:01 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'kolla' | 14:01 |
| mnasiadka | #topic rollcall | 14:01 |
| mnasiadka | o/ | 14:01 |
| frickler | \o | 14:01 |
| matfechner | o/ | 14:01 |
| mgoddard | \o | 14:02 |
| mmalchuk | hi | 14:02 |
| mnasiadka | #topic agenda | 14:04 |
| mnasiadka | * CI status | 14:04 |
| mnasiadka | * Release tasks | 14:04 |
| mnasiadka | * Regular stable releases (first meeting in a month) | 14:04 |
| mnasiadka | * Current cycle planning | 14:04 |
| mnasiadka | * Additional agenda (from whiteboard) | 14:04 |
| mnasiadka | * Open discussion | 14:04 |
| mnasiadka | #topic CI status | 14:04 |
| mnasiadka | green I believe | 14:04 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Release tasks | 14:04 |
| frickler | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/853072 | 14:05 |
| frickler | patch we discussed last week | 14:05 |
| mnasiadka | thanks frickler, that was the one I was looking for | 14:05 |
| frickler | needed to add jammy uca to infra for it to pass | 14:05 |
| mnasiadka | yes, I remember | 14:06 |
| mnasiadka | CentOS part - well, first we need CentOS 9 Stream / Rocky Linux 9 working :) | 14:06 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Current cycle planning | 14:06 |
| mnasiadka | So, I'm following up on hrw's CentOS change and adding Rocky Linux 9 to the mix | 14:07 |
| mnasiadka | rockylinux-9 nodes in opendev have some issues now, waiting for them to be resolved | 14:07 |
| mnasiadka | basically we'll build Rocky Linux 9 images with delorean-deps and CentOS SIG repo packages (just like we do for CentOS Stream 9) | 14:08 |
| mnasiadka | If situation evolves on Rocky Linux side and they will have their own equivalents of the repositories - we'll switch | 14:08 |
| mnasiadka | Anybody working on any other features from the priorities list? | 14:10 |
| mnasiadka | I guess systemd/podman and Let's Encrypt need reviews and testing | 14:11 |
| mnasiadka | No additional agenda (the one on whiteboard is from last week), so I'll move to open discussion | 14:12 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Open discussion | 14:12 |
| mnasiadka | Anybody anything? | 14:12 |
| mnasiadka | Well then, it's been a fast meeting ;-) | 14:15 |
| mnasiadka | Thanks for attending! | 14:15 |
| mnasiadka | #endmeeting | 14:15 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Aug 17 14:15:10 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:15 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2022/kolla.2022-08-17-14.01.html | 14:15 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2022/kolla.2022-08-17-14.01.txt | 14:15 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2022/kolla.2022-08-17-14.01.log.html | 14:15 |
| frickler | thx mnasiadka | 14:15 |
| rockey | might be one of the fastest ones to date :P | 14:15 |
| mmalchuk | faster than internet speed) | 14:17 |
| opendevreview | Will Szumski proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Introduce variables for cinder backend names https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/853006 | 14:24 |
| zbig | hey everyone, I am a looking for a tip wrt error I got when deploying openstack with kolla ansible. The error message itself is https://pastebin.com/pLQvZmys as for my configs, I used yoga version of kolla ansible, running on bare metal servers with ubuntu 20.04 and configured kolla to use ubuntu source images. Any idea what this error is about? Sth wrong my config? I tried to changing kolla images to be | 14:51 |
| zbig | based on centos but got the same issue | 14:51 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 16:52 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!