Tuesday, 2022-08-09

*** osmanlicilegi is now known as Guest001:48
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej06:16
mnasiadkaadmin1: rhel8 support is deprecated in Xena, that means we don't test it (well, we never tested it) and we don't really support it.06:36
opendevreviewVerification of a change to openstack/kolla master failed: Remove Keystone admin endpoint  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/84375108:57
fricklertooz/protobuf u-c conflict breaking CI ^^ https://8a874fe53877280064a1-1a1dc7cbee41e9efce3274023c92b346.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/843751/5/gate/kolla-build-debian/a3dc6e8/kolla/build/000_FAILED_openstack-base.log09:23
fricklerwill nag oslos09:27
hrwthx09:27
hrwmove from protobuf 3 -> 4 was  on 20 July09:29
hrw3.20.1 -> 4.21.209:29
hrwtooz 3.0.0 is 4th August09:30
mnasiadkaINFO:kolla.common.utils.openstack-base:[91mERROR: Cannot install tooz[consul,etcd,etcd3,etcd3gw,ipc,memcached,mysql,postgresql,redis,zake,zookeeper]==3.0.0 because these package versions have conflicting dependencies.10:00
mnasiadkagate broken :D10:00
mnasiadkahttps://8a874fe53877280064a1-1a1dc7cbee41e9efce3274023c92b346.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/843751/5/gate/kolla-build-debian/a3dc6e8/kolla/build/000_FAILED_openstack-base.log10:00
hrwmnasiadka: look a bit earlier ;D10:00
hrwI blame tooz10:00
opendevreviewStephen Finucane proposed openstack/kolla master: Don't install the tooz etcd3 extra  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/85253410:01
hrwyay10:03
hrwINFO:kolla.common.utils.openstack-base:Built at 2022-08-09 12:17:02.795381 (took 0:01:28.258287)10:17
hrwwatch that patch10:17
opendevreviewMichal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Edit services roles to support database sharding  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/77021610:17
opendevreviewMichal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add loadbalancer-config role and wrap haproxy-config role inside  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/85100410:17
opendevreviewMichal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add proxysql-config role and wrap it in loadbalancer-config role  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/85144210:17
opendevreviewMichal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [CI] Test ProxySQL with shards in the nova cells scenario  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/77062110:17
opendevreviewMichal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [DNM] Trigger cells job  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/83891610:17
opendevreviewMichal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Use Docker healthchecks for mariadb-server service  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/80561610:17
kevkoHi \o/, anybody for second +2 and +w for my proxysql patches guys :) ? 10:22
hrwI have to admit that I do not understand those proxysql patches10:23
kevkohrw: well, main logic is already merged ...other patches is only just defaults .. :/10:23
opendevreviewMerged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/yoga: Set the ironic notification level  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/85092410:41
opendevreviewMerged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/wallaby: Set the ironic notification level  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/85092611:05
opendevreviewMerged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/xena: Set the ironic notification level  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/85092511:05
admin1mnasiadka, but i am using ubuntu and not rhel812:43
mnasiadkaadmin1: focal?12:47
admin1jammy 12:47
admin1on master 12:47
admin1jammy support is still not out yet12:48
opendevreviewMerged openstack/kolla master: Don't install the tooz etcd3 extra  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/85253412:48
mnasiadkaadmin1: works in CI last time I checked12:49
mnasiadkakevko_: do we test proxysql and sharding in any of the CI jobs?12:49
admin1that was my assumption ( worked on ci) .. and then tried to test it 12:49
admin1all worked fine, except the nova issue12:49
opendevreviewMichal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla master: Remove Keystone admin endpoint  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/84375112:51
fricklerkevko_: can you please stop doing useless rebases? zuul will rebase the patch automatically for testing, a simple "recheck gate fix merged" comment would have been enough for ^^12:58
fricklersame goes for you proxysql stack12:58
frickler*your12:58
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch13:01
kevko_mnasiadka: yes we are testing -> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/770621 << nova_cells scenario13:07
kevko_mnasiadka: here -> it's green -> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/83891613:07
kevko_frickler: hmm, sorry I didn't know that i can just type "recheck gate fix merged" ... i saw there was an error with etcd3 which is now merged ..so i just rebased onto top of that merged commit 13:08
kevko_frickler: for proxysql patch stack i had a merge conflict but i realized that i don't need that patch so i abandoned ..13:09
kevko_but maybe someone can give me +2 as there are only "simple" patches left as main logic was already merged13:10
hrwkevko_: you do your patch, it is branched and tested in such branch. when final merge happens on zuul then it is merged on top of master branch13:10
hrwkevko_: so as long as master's changes are not needed for you no rebase is needed13:11
kevko_just recheck ..13:11
kevko_correct ? 13:11
hrwyes13:11
kevko_ok, i will know 13:11
kevko_thanks13:11
hrwif your patchset needs new code from master then 'git review -d; git up; CHECK; git review'13:11
hrwkevko_: unless you want to beat https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/430940 which took 50 revisions13:13
kevko_and what is the difference if i rebase patch in review onto top of master (with merged fix) ...and just type recheck .. zuul will test it in both cases, won't it ? 13:14
hrwrebase generates mails13:14
kevko_understand13:14
opendevreviewMerged openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add clouds.yaml file and use it  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/45200513:14
opendevreviewMerged openstack/kolla master: Honour the linuxbridge experimental status  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/85202313:14
hrwkevko_: and if developerX reviewed revisionY then your rebase generates revisionY+1 which needs review again13:15
hrwunless it is 'gerrit, do rebase' as then votes stay13:16
kevko_yeah, but only commit message will be changed 13:17
mnasiadkakevko_: so let's merge it first and get other patches tested ;-)13:19
hrwkevko_: nope. commit is same13:19
kevko_mnasiadka: ok, but it's tested as there is dummy patch which is triggering this test -> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/83891613:21
mnasiadkakevko_: I mean that e.g. this patch - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/770216 - did not run this CI job, so we only know that it hasn't broken the usual scenarios13:22
kevko_mnasiadka: ok Michal, thank you :) 13:23
admin1mnasiadka, is there a way to debug and check why its not working ? or what can i submit ? 13:53
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej14:02
opendevreviewMerged openstack/kolla-ansible master: Honour the linuxbridge experimental status  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/85202214:21
kevko_hrw, frickler  one more question about CI :) , when patch has 2x +2 and +w , i should see this in zuul queue, shouldn't I ? 14:23
hrwunless it depends-on other not merged patches14:24
* hrw out14:27
frickleralso needs Zuul+1 before entering gate queue15:02
SvenKieskekevko_ you should add a reason to your recheck command afaik; there is a policy somewhere that there should not be rechecks without a reasoning15:35
kevko_frickler: well it has all -> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/77062115:41
kevko_hrw: depends-on only or also if patch is in stack of patches ? 15:42
fricklerkevko_: nope, it has three patches in the stack below it, those are implicit dependencies and need to be approved/merged first15:43
kevko_frickler: hmm :( 15:43
kevko_mnasiadka: so, if I understand guys correctly, CI patch for proxysql Cells can't be merged before patches below in stack :/ 15:44
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off15:57
admin1mnasiadka, where do I check the kolla-ansible CI logs ? 16:56
opendevreviewJames Kirsch proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add support for LetsEncrypt-managed certs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/74134018:19

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!