Wednesday, 2022-07-20

opendevreviewzhangmeng proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add [taskflow] section for masakari.conf.j2  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/85029102:59
opendevreviewzhangmeng proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: make "external_labels" optional on prometheus.yml  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/85044604:33
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej06:09
opendevreviewzhangmeng proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add [taskflow] section for masakari.conf.j2  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/85029107:22
opendevreviewzhangmeng proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: make "external_labels" optional on prometheus.yml  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/85044607:25
opendevreviewMarcin Juszkiewicz proposed openstack/kolla master: Move to CentOS Stream 9  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/83666408:14
mnasiadkayoctozepto: any idea why init-core-openstack.sh returns "NoneType: None"? ;-)08:33
mnasiadkahttps://242e2d49961bdfdf1880-906744ae5f779cf07a1bcffe2431d77c.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/846070/14/check/kolla-ansible-ubuntu-source-linuxbridge/304ffb3/job-output.txt08:34
hrwany idea why init-runonce fails on CI?09:46
hrwhttps://storage.gra.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_7ae/836664/41/check/kolla-ansible-centos9s-source/7aede1f/primary/logs/ansible/init-runonce09:46
hrwworks fine on local all-in-one09:46
hrwit failed that way twice (older runs did not got so far)09:47
opendevreviewWill Szumski proposed openstack/kolla master: Install etcd binary from github  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/84736810:20
opendevreviewWill Szumski proposed openstack/kolla master: Install etcd binary from github  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/84736810:22
opendevreviewWill Szumski proposed openstack/kolla master: Install etcd binary from github  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/84736811:20
opendevreviewWill Szumski proposed openstack/kolla master: Install etcd binary from github  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/84736811:21
yoctozeptomnasiadka: whaaaaa; this looks like ansible failed running it11:29
yoctozeptomnasiadka: https://242e2d49961bdfdf1880-906744ae5f779cf07a1bcffe2431d77c.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/846070/14/check/kolla-ansible-ubuntu-source-linuxbridge/304ffb3/primary/logs/ansible/init-runonce11:29
yoctozeptoseemingly ansible failed to report how it really failed11:30
yoctozeptofor linuxbridge we know it's now experimental11:30
yoctozeptoso failure is expected11:30
yoctozeptonobody cared thus far ;-)11:30
yoctozeptohrw: 2022-07-19 17:37:46.682 28 ERROR oslo.messaging._drivers.impl_rabbit [-] [7a623525-36cd-4634-ab59-287d064e224a] AMQP server on 192.0.2.1:5671 is unreachable: <RecoverableConnectionError: unknown error>. Trying again in 1 seconds.: amqp.exceptions.RecoverableConnectionError: <RecoverableConnectionError: unknown error>11:31
yoctozeptohrw: 2022-07-19T17:33:14.070351874Z /usr/lib/rabbitmq/bin/rabbitmq-server: line 155:    33 Killed                  start_rabbitmq_server "$@"11:32
yoctozeptorabbitmq died11:32
yoctozeptomaybe run out of memory?11:32
yoctozeptoor whatever11:32
yoctozeptohttps://storage.gra.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_7ae/836664/41/check/kolla-ansible-centos9s-source/7aede1f/primary/logs/docker_logs/rabbitmq.txt11:32
mnasiadkahrw: answeing to your question, seems Ubuntu is feeling better11:46
opendevreviewMichal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: init-runonce: Migrate to ECDSA keys  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/84718712:04
mnasiadkayoctozepto: updated, let's hope you're happier ;)12:05
yoctozeptomnasiadka: happier12:08
mnasiadkaso we need a second reviewer for the Jammy patches12:08
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch12:10
opendevreviewMichal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kayobe master: Add support for Ubuntu Jammy (22.04 LTS)  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/85051512:25
opendevreviewMichal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kayobe master: Update to latest Rocky Linux cloud image  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/84864912:28
yoctozeptomnasiadka, hrw, mgoddard: I'm double-booked for today's meeting; might not be responsive13:00
mgoddardyoctozepto: ack13:00
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej13:20
hrwmorning13:45
hrwyoctozepto: but what rmq has to security group?13:45
mnasiadkamgoddard mnasiadka hrw yoctozepto bbezak parallax Fl1nt frickler adrian-a - meeting in 6 minutes13:54
hrwk13:57
RamonaRautenberg[m]Frickler is at vacation13:59
mnasiadka#startmeeting kolla14:00
opendevmeetMeeting started Wed Jul 20 14:00:01 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is mnasiadka. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.14:00
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.14:00
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'kolla'14:00
mnasiadka#topic rollcall14:00
mnasiadkao/14:00
yoctozeptoo/14:00
RamonaRautenberg[m]o/14:00
yoctozeptohrw: to controlplane functioning at all14:00
hrw(°)(.)14:00
hrwyoctozepto: ok14:01
ihalomio/14:01
mmalchukhi14:01
mnasiadka#topic agenda14:02
mnasiadka* Review action items from the last meeting14:02
mnasiadka* CI status14:02
mnasiadka* Release tasks14:02
mnasiadka* Regular stable releases (first meeting in a month)14:02
mnasiadka* Current cycle planning14:02
mnasiadka* Additional agenda (from whiteboard)14:02
TimBeermann[m]o/14:02
mnasiadka* Open discussion14:02
mnasiadka#topic Review action items from the last meeting14:02
mnasiadkamnasiadka Monasca - ensure it's marked as unbuildable where it should be and evaluate later in the cycle if situation fixed itself14:03
mnasiadkaI think that's done, it's marked as unbuildable, if we care about it - then we'll look at it near release14:03
mnasiadka#topic CI status14:03
mnasiadkawhiteboard says it's green14:04
mnasiadka#topic Release tasks14:04
hrwnot many changes recently so CI does not have anything new to fail on14:04
mgoddard\o14:04
mnasiadkait's R-11, nothing on our internal calendar14:04
mnasiadkahrw: yeah, without centos nothing is failing :)14:05
hrwmnasiadka: ;D14:05
mnasiadka#topic Regular stable releases (first meeting in a month)14:05
mnasiadkaI don't think it's first meeting this month, so let's move on14:05
mnasiadka#topic Current cycle planning14:05
mnasiadkaSo, Ubuntu Jammy is on a good path to get merged I guess, need a second reviewer (thanks yoctozepto for reviewing)14:06
mnasiadkahrw: how's CS9?14:06
hrwimages build. k-a has some stuff to sort out14:06
yoctozeptoyw mnasiadka14:06
mnasiadkaso cs9 in progress14:06
hrwand I dropped dumb-init from cs914:06
hrwwill get mariadb-clustercheck as systemd unit for cs914:07
mnasiadkawell, I think if we're moving out of dumb-init - we should move everywhere14:07
mnasiadkaand probably it needs some better discussion if systemd is the proper direction ;-)14:07
mnasiadkamgoddard, yoctozepto: any thoughts?14:07
hrwmnasiadka: then it would need deprecation/removal cycle etc14:07
yoctozeptosystemd is the future (TM)14:08
yoctozeptothough it's probably an overkill14:08
mnasiadkayeah, that's what I think14:08
mnasiadkaI proposed we could do socat instead of xinetd, just for simplicity14:09
hrwgive me working mariadb-clustercheck14:09
yoctozeptoindeed14:09
mgoddardsystemd sounds overkill14:09
yoctozeptocan you help hrw, mnasiadka?14:09
mnasiadkaYes, I'll post a patch to move to socat instead of xinetd14:09
mgoddardin a container at least14:09
yoctozeptoI am out of time14:09
yoctozeptothanks14:09
hrwmnasiadka: thanks14:10
mnasiadkaok14:10
mnasiadkaany other features to discuss?14:10
mnasiadkaI guess we want to start RL9 work once CS9 is in nice state?14:11
hrwfirst RL9 needs ceph etc repos14:11
mnasiadkayeah14:11
hrwCS9 patch has RL9 lines inside if someone wants to test14:12
mgoddardcan we use CS9 repos on RL9?14:12
hrwmgoddard: what point of using rl9 then?14:12
mgoddardbase repos14:13
hrwwhich may not be fully in match with cs914:13
mgoddardmost would be rl9 or third party14:13
mgoddardit could be a temporary solution14:13
mnasiadkalet's first have working cs914:13
mnasiadkathen we can start filling rl9 gaps14:13
hrwand in meantime someone can ask RL9 team do/when they plan SIG repos14:14
mnasiadkawell, initially they planned to use CentOS SIG repos14:14
mnasiadkaBut I can ask around14:14
mgoddardwe can also test cs9 containers on rl914:14
mgoddardwhich is what we currently do with rl814:15
mnasiadkathat's why let's get cs9 working and look at the situation a bit later than days after RL9.0 GA14:16
hrwyep14:16
hrwsmall steps14:16
mnasiadkayes14:16
opendevreviewMarcin Juszkiewicz proposed openstack/kolla master: Move to CentOS Stream 9  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/83666414:17
hrwlet's play with dumb-init again14:17
mnasiadkaok then, nobody wants to discuss features - let's go with additional agenda ;-)14:17
mnasiadka#topic Additional agenda (from whiteboard)14:18
mnasiadka(hrw) CentOS Stream 914:18
mnasiadkathat's done14:18
mnasiadka(frickler) Virtual PTG planning14:18
mnasiadkawhen to do it14:18
mnasiadkacoordinate with other teams that also want to do virtual sessions?14:18
mnasiadkaSo, first of all - we need to all agree that we're doing virtual PTG14:18
mnasiadkanobody changed their mind?14:18
mnasiadkaAs in ONLY virtual PTG14:18
hrwvPTG or none14:18
mnasiadkaok, that one is clear14:19
mnasiadkawhen - I think we take the usual slot in the week and that's it?14:19
mnasiadkaand third - coordinate with other teams? I don't think we ever coordinated with other teams.14:20
mnasiadkamaybe frickler will raise this once again when he's back14:21
hrwyoctozepto is in multiple teams so he needs to coordinate14:21
hrwetc14:21
mnasiadkaah yes, in that sense yes14:21
hrwI try to attend multiarch sig meetings for example14:21
mnasiadkamy second nearly alive project is not doing PTG, so I'm not in that situation.14:22
mnasiadkaonce the schedule will be more or less known - we can try to shuffle14:22
hrwI remember spending time in nova ptg in past14:22
hrwmnasiadka: we are good at shuffling tasks during day if someone is missing14:22
mnasiadkahrw: yes, that's mastered ;)14:22
mnasiadkaok, next one14:23
mnasiadka(headphoneJames) please review let's encrypt patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/74134014:23
mnasiadkaI promised to review, so I guess it's time to look into it14:23
mnasiadkaif anybody (non-core? even better!) has spare cycles to review it and even test it - I would be grateful14:23
mnasiadka(i.halomi) Podman and systemd support status14:24
mnasiadkareview of systemd with docker a current status on podman version14:24
mnasiadkaI think it's the same, reviewers welcome14:24
mnasiadkahttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/81672414:25
ihalomiwould be really nice to get review as we are finishing podman version14:25
mnasiadka+114:25
mnasiadka#topic Open discussion14:25
ihalomialso i will create change for kolla-ansible collection for  podman baremetal14:26
ihalomishould i somewhere mention it depends on merge of that podman change?14:26
mnasiadkaI have a question regarding reviews - I know some other teams are hosting video/audio calls for doing reviews in a bigger audience - do we want to try to revive 'Kolla Kall' and try to increase our review velocity by that?14:27
mnasiadkaihalomi: use Depends-On: in commit message14:27
hrwmnasiadka: can be interesting expierence14:27
mgoddardihalomi: it doesn't necessarily need to depend14:28
Connoridzemnasiadka: +1 for video/audio calls. 14:29
mnasiadkaok, seems we could do one and see how it goes14:29
mnasiadkayoctozepto: since you were running them in the past - do you want to take that role again (it's fine if you don't)?14:30
ConnoridzeWhere? When?14:30
ihalomimgoddard: it takes container_engine as parameter to decide if install podman or docker so it kinda depends14:30
yoctozeptomnasiadka: not really, too busy14:31
mnasiadkaOk, maybe let's try for frickler and others to come back from PTO and try to schedule that outside of summer vacation timeframe ;-)14:34
mnasiadkaAny other topics for open discussion?14:34
ConnoridzeCan i ask here for review? plz14:35
Connoridzehttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/84971114:35
mnasiadkaok then14:40
mnasiadkalet's finish for today14:40
mnasiadkathanks for attending!14:40
mnasiadka#endmeeting14:40
opendevmeetMeeting ended Wed Jul 20 14:40:18 2022 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)14:40
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2022/kolla.2022-07-20-14.00.html14:40
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2022/kolla.2022-07-20-14.00.txt14:40
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2022/kolla.2022-07-20-14.00.log.html14:40
ConnoridzeAlso, I would like to know, do we need to add glusterfs and google cloud drivers for cinder-backup?14:40
* hrw out14:41
yoctozeptoConnoridze: it's ok; though you don't "need to"14:45
mgoddardihalomi: container_engine will need to be a default in the role, so no code-level dependency14:56
opendevreviewMerged openstack/kolla-ansible master: Corrected the config file to use when stopping neutron-openvswitch-agent  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/85031218:58
opendevreviewJuan Pablo Suazo proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Allows for multiple Ceph Conf files  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/84802921:39

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!