| *** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 07:34 | |
| opendevreview | Kyle Dean proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Added firewalld configuration based off enabled services https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/847955 | 08:48 |
|---|---|---|
| kevko | frickler: here ? | 10:15 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 12:06 | |
| frickler | kevko: on and off. might be much easier if you simply write what's on your mind | 12:08 |
| kevko | frickler: i have a quick question .. regarding your patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron-dynamic-routing/+/815265 | 12:09 |
| kevko | frickler: we had issues with autoreschedule when agent died ..so I switched to new scheduler as you proposed ... | 12:10 |
| kevko | frickler: but now i can see this in neutron log .. is it ok ? https://paste.opendev.org/show/bePvyDyeWBLs4zjeAkbD/ | 12:11 |
| kevko | it doesn't look like | 12:11 |
| frickler | that looks like a bug, yes. can you please create a bug report on neutron lp? | 12:15 |
| kevko | sure | 12:16 |
| kevko | frickler: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1980235 | 12:20 |
| kevko | frickler: what should be the fix ? override schedule method and just do nothing ? | 12:31 |
| frickler | kevko: I'm not sure by just looking at the error, will need to try to reproduce this. do you see this error regularly or is it triggered by some action? also which version is this? also we should maybe move this to #openstack-neutron before we get kicked here | 12:42 |
| *** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 13:15 | |
| kevko | frickler: neutron is xena ... yeah ..this is very easy to replicate ...just turn of neutron_bgp_dragent and check the logs after while .. | 13:20 |
| mnasiadka | mgoddard mnasiadka hrw yoctozepto bbezak parallax Fl1nt frickler adrian-a - meeting in 10 minutes | 13:50 |
| mnasiadka | #startmeeting kolla | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Jun 29 14:00:54 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mnasiadka. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'kolla' | 14:00 |
| mnasiadka | #topic rollcall | 14:01 |
| mnasiadka | o/ | 14:01 |
| ra-rau | o/ | 14:01 |
| kevko | \o/ | 14:01 |
| mgoddard | \o | 14:01 |
| yoctozepto | o/ | 14:01 |
| mnasiadka | #topic agenda | 14:02 |
| mnasiadka | * Announcements | 14:02 |
| mnasiadka | * Review action items from the last meeting | 14:02 |
| mnasiadka | * CI status | 14:02 |
| mnasiadka | * Release tasks | 14:02 |
| mnasiadka | * Regular stable releases (first meeting in a month) | 14:02 |
| mnasiadka | * Current cycle planning | 14:02 |
| mnasiadka | * Additional agenda (from whiteboard) | 14:02 |
| mnasiadka | * Open discussion | 14:02 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Announcements | 14:02 |
| mnasiadka | I'm off on vacation starting tomorrow - will be back 18th July | 14:02 |
| yoctozepto | have fun, mnasiadka | 14:03 |
| mnasiadka | yoctozepto, frickler, mgoddard: would be nice if you could run the meetings - or just cancel them if you can't ;-) | 14:03 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Review action items from the last meeting | 14:03 |
| mnasiadka | hrw to look for aarch64 failures in yoga/master | 14:03 |
| mnasiadka | frickler to continue working on Grafana dashboards | 14:03 |
| mnasiadka | frickler/mnasiadka to handle Monasca being unbuildable (mark as unbuildable, send mail to ML around volunteers to fix, if not submit a patch to drop) | 14:03 |
| mnasiadka | I think hrw did look into aarch failures, just ubuntu aarch64 is broken | 14:04 |
| frickler | no progress on the dashboards yet, let me know if you want any changes | 14:04 |
| mnasiadka | the fault is somewhere in erlang/rabbitmq repos - but he doesn't have a priority on working on this | 14:04 |
| yoctozepto | I am unsure how many arm64 users we have; especially ubuntu arm64 users | 14:04 |
| frickler | there wasn't any reply to the mail from hrw unless I missed something | 14:05 |
| yoctozepto | since the only reliably supported distro is debian | 14:05 |
| mnasiadka | Around Monasca - I feel we just leave it as unbuildable on aarch64, and see how the x86 situation evolves (wheel for python3.10 and so on) | 14:05 |
| yoctozepto | we should probably just focus on supporting it | 14:05 |
| mnasiadka | yoctozepto: hrw mentioned a plan to deprecate support for Ubuntu aarch64 | 14:05 |
| frickler | action: yoctozepto supports monasca ;) | 14:06 |
| yoctozepto | mnasiadka: makes sense | 14:06 |
| yoctozepto | frickler: I was talking debian arm64 | 14:06 |
| yoctozepto | as our only supported arm64 distro | 14:06 |
| mnasiadka | ok, so aarch situation is more or less clear | 14:06 |
| yoctozepto | kill monasca | 14:06 |
| mnasiadka | can anybody work with frickler on those dashboards? | 14:06 |
| frickler | ah, o.k. then | 14:06 |
| mnasiadka | As in evaluate if those are useful and propose changes to them? | 14:06 |
| frickler | we can also drop it if nobody wants the data | 14:07 |
| mnasiadka | I see there are no volunteers ;-) | 14:08 |
| mnasiadka | Let's leave that topic for now | 14:09 |
| yoctozepto | so, monasca | 14:09 |
| yoctozepto | what do we expect? | 14:10 |
| mnasiadka | Currently in x86 we have two distros in master - Ubuntu and Debian | 14:10 |
| mnasiadka | I understand it works on Debian, missing wheels on Ubuntu Jammy (don't remember if we finally have merged the support) | 14:10 |
| yoctozepto | missing wheels and not buildable from sources? | 14:11 |
| mnasiadka | missing wheels on aarch64, but that's another story | 14:11 |
| yoctozepto | ok | 14:11 |
| frickler | missing wheels for py3.10, too | 14:11 |
| yoctozepto | I don't think we merged jammy | 14:11 |
| mnasiadka | so let's wait until we get Jammy and CS9/RL9 stable-ish | 14:11 |
| mnasiadka | and see if it only works on Debian/x86 - because if it does, it's kind of sad | 14:11 |
| yoctozepto | well, it's one-man's solution still, no? | 14:12 |
| yoctozepto | and not their priority | 14:12 |
| mnasiadka | yeah, PTL pushes patches and does +2+w to his own patches :) | 14:12 |
| mnasiadka | That's what I mean as let's reevaluate later. | 14:12 |
| mnasiadka | mgoddard: opinion? | 14:12 |
| mnasiadka | As in I guess there are some users - we'd prefer for this to maybe survive another cycle in Kolla. | 14:13 |
| mgoddard | IMO: mark unbuildable where necessary, evaluate later | 14:13 |
| mgoddard | dependency problems sometimes resolve themselves | 14:14 |
| mgoddard | if not, we can have another talk | 14:14 |
| mnasiadka | Ok then - I'll check the Jammy patches if we mark it as unbuildable there - and let's leave it as is for now. | 14:15 |
| mnasiadka | #action mnasiadka Monasca - ensure it's marked as unbuildable where it should be and evaluate later in the cycle if situation fixed itself | 14:15 |
| yoctozepto | we can alert the community that it has issues | 14:15 |
| yoctozepto | I did not see the promised mails | 14:15 |
| mnasiadka | yoctozepto: hrw did send a mail that it does not build, no answers | 14:16 |
| mnasiadka | let's go further | 14:17 |
| mnasiadka | #topic CI status | 14:17 |
| yoctozepto | mnasiadka: ack, I missed it | 14:17 |
| mnasiadka | apart from Neutron in upper-constraints.txt breaking stable/yoga - I think we're mainly fine. | 14:17 |
| yoctozepto | yup | 14:17 |
| mnasiadka | but the situation that upper-constraints.txt pins neutron and neutron-lib - means we need to analyse our builds to see if there are other things that are pinned (which then makes our source builds a bit incosistent) | 14:18 |
| mnasiadka | e.g. we install neutron-lib from pypi (pinned in upper-constraints) - not the latest version from opendev's git | 14:19 |
| mnasiadka | but let's leave it for now I guess | 14:19 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Release tasks | 14:19 |
| mnasiadka | We have R-14 Jun 27 - Jul 01 | 14:20 |
| mnasiadka | nothing in release calendar, nothing in Kolla contributor docs around that | 14:20 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Regular stable releases (first meeting in a month) | 14:20 |
| mnasiadka | I think it's for next meeting | 14:21 |
| frickler | not yet, will do next week | 14:21 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Current cycle planning | 14:21 |
| mnasiadka | So, Jammy needs some love - the tzdata thing - if nobody will pick it up - I'll work on it after my vacation. | 14:22 |
| mnasiadka | What about systemd/podman? | 14:22 |
| mnasiadka | mgoddard, yoctozepto - you're listed as reviewers - any movement there? | 14:23 |
| mgoddard | not here | 14:23 |
| mnasiadka | Do you have some time to look into it for the next 2-3 weeks? | 14:23 |
| frickler | there was a mention about things getting reworked some weeks ago, but I haven't seen any of that happening | 14:23 |
| kevko | and proxysql ? :/ | 14:24 |
| yoctozepto | mnasiadka: not here either | 14:25 |
| mnasiadka | Basically there are two patches - one is not touched since March, second is failing CI | 14:25 |
| mnasiadka | Ok, so let's try proxysql | 14:25 |
| mnasiadka | yoctozepto: you're listed as reviewer ;-) | 14:25 |
| yoctozepto | yeah, I know, I feel bad about it | 14:25 |
| yoctozepto | I have it in my TODOs for this week again but I'm usually force to postpone it, week by week | 14:26 |
| yoctozepto | this one looks more promising but I can't guarantee | 14:26 |
| mnasiadka | Ok, anyone else can commit to reviewing it? | 14:26 |
| yoctozepto | yeah, we need a 2nd pair of eyes on that | 14:26 |
| kevko | i can help with podman/systemd maybe .. several times i already do some review .. | 14:27 |
| mgoddard | it could use some testing | 14:27 |
| mnasiadka | I think now we need to understand what changes need to be done and we need some testing | 14:27 |
| mnasiadka | around podman | 14:28 |
| mnasiadka | anyway, proxysql would be nice to get it in finally | 14:28 |
| mnasiadka | let's move on | 14:28 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Additional agenda (from whiteboard) | 14:28 |
| mnasiadka | (yoctozepto) EOL Train (the CI is dead) | 14:29 |
| yoctozepto | may we? | 14:29 |
| mnasiadka | looks like we should | 14:29 |
| mnasiadka | any arguments why not? | 14:29 |
| mnasiadka | ok | 14:33 |
| kevko | nope ..sounds like a good idea | 14:33 |
| mnasiadka | yoctozepto: will you? | 14:33 |
| yoctozepto | ok | 14:33 |
| yoctozepto | though I don't remember how | 14:33 |
| yoctozepto | :D | 14:33 |
| frickler | pull the red handle, that should stop the train *scnr* | 14:34 |
| yoctozepto | :D | 14:35 |
| yoctozepto | I will figure it out though, no biggies | 14:35 |
| yoctozepto | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/818920 | 14:36 |
| yoctozepto | seems easy :D | 14:36 |
| kevko | btw, anyone for +2 and +w for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/818727 ? | 14:38 |
| mgoddard | just to rock the boat on that one, would a new label make more sense? | 14:40 |
| mgoddard | kolla_commit | 14:40 |
| yoctozepto | makes sense | 14:41 |
| yoctozepto | though the original change is also fine by me | 14:41 |
| yoctozepto | (as indicated by CR+2) | 14:41 |
| mgoddard | I don't really use the label, so didn't weigh in | 14:42 |
| mgoddard | and won't push it | 14:42 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Open discussion | 14:45 |
| mnasiadka | (Since you already started it) | 14:45 |
| kevko | well, i wanted to add new label kolla_commit ..but hrw i think didn't want to add new label | 14:45 |
| kevko | but from my perspective of view it makes sense to identify by a label from which commit image was build .. also ..kolla is releasing version from time to time ..while bugfixes etc are released as a commits .. | 14:46 |
| kevko | because kolla_version=X.Y.Z is totally useless if I am building from a git with some fix ..but version is same | 14:47 |
| yoctozepto | yeah, it's at least confusing | 14:48 |
| yoctozepto | perhaps useless indeed | 14:48 |
| yoctozepto | I agree we need to merge something | 14:49 |
| mnasiadka | I think let's reuse the existing label, the logic in the patch looks reasonable | 14:49 |
| frickler | might be a sign we should release more often, though | 14:49 |
| mnasiadka | instead of having two variables and confusing users | 14:49 |
| mnasiadka | (which probably have no clue that label exists) | 14:49 |
| yoctozepto | frickler: well, it does not solve kevko's issue but surely we should for all those who still use releases for some reason | 14:49 |
| yoctozepto | mnasiadka: well, I guess the issue with the second label is that it might not exist when it's not from git | 14:50 |
| yoctozepto | otoh, the format of the current one changes so parsing might fail | 14:50 |
| yoctozepto | yet, I would bet users using this label are kolla-savvy enough to handle this hiccup | 14:50 |
| yoctozepto | so it's a very hypothetical discussion | 14:51 |
| yoctozepto | could we though improve it to show dirty state? | 14:51 |
| yoctozepto | or better yet what frickler proposed in the comment | 14:51 |
| yoctozepto | that would be better | 14:51 |
| mnasiadka | well, surely we need to resolve the conversation there :) | 14:52 |
| kevko | hmm, so X.Y-Z-commit if build from git, X.Y.Z if built from source not from git ? | 14:53 |
| yoctozepto | I guess so? | 14:53 |
| yoctozepto | could use including the examples that it will generate | 14:54 |
| mnasiadka | ok, solve it somehow, I need to start packing :) | 14:55 |
| mnasiadka | Thanks for coming! | 14:55 |
| mnasiadka | #endmeeting | 14:55 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Jun 29 14:55:53 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:55 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2022/kolla.2022-06-29-14.00.html | 14:55 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2022/kolla.2022-06-29-14.00.txt | 14:55 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2022/kolla.2022-06-29-14.00.log.html | 14:55 |
| yoctozepto | :D | 14:55 |
| yoctozepto | thanks mnasiadka | 14:55 |
| yoctozepto | have a good one | 14:56 |
| * yoctozepto off | 14:56 | |
| SvenKieske | mhm, missed that meeting | 15:45 |
| SvenKieske | frickler: what kind of work are you interested in regarding grafana dashboards? we currently have a huge internal merge request open and I already dreamed about participating this stuff upstream to get production ready dashboards into kolla-ansible | 15:46 |
| SvenKieske | frickler: would that be something you are interested in? that would maybe also lift some of the maintenance burden on all people involved. | 15:47 |
| SvenKieske | you can reach me by mail I guess, because I'm not always in IRC.. | 15:51 |
| opendevreview | Kyle Dean proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Added firewalld configuration based off enabled services https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/847955 | 16:43 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 16:52 | |
| *** berendt_ is now known as berendt | 17:57 | |
| opendevreview | Kyle Dean proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Added firewalld configuration based off enabled services https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/847955 | 17:59 |
| opendevreview | Kyle Dean proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Added firewalld configuration based off enabled services https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/847955 | 18:00 |
| opendevreview | Kyle Dean proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: added firewalld configuration based off enabled services https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/847955 | 19:01 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!