| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: haproxy: support single external frontend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/823395 | 08:00 |
|---|---|---|
| SvenKieske | morning | 08:29 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kayobe master: Add support for Rocky Linux 8 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/831652 | 08:38 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kayobe master: Add support for Rocky Linux 8 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/831652 | 08:44 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: haproxy: support single external frontend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/823395 | 09:00 |
| opendevreview | yangjianfeng proposed openstack/ansible-collection-kolla master: Add support for git http/https proxy setup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/832770 | 09:39 |
| opendevreview | yangjianfeng proposed openstack/ansible-collection-kolla master: baremetal: Add support for git http/https proxy setup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collection-kolla/+/832770 | 09:41 |
| sri_ | Hi Team, quick question, I am using two different interface exp:(octavia_network_interface: "enp9s0", neutron_external_interface: "enp7s0"): if that is case physnet1 can only used by one of this two networks right ? | 09:50 |
| sri_ | this is my globals.yml config: https://paste.openstack.org/show/b9609hfvztqClMa6fwAw/, in this example I am using physnet1 in lb-mgmt-net, because of that I am not able to create a external network using physnet1 , how to I map these two interfaces to physnet1, physnet2 ! | 09:56 |
| wuchunya_ | octavia_network_interface don't need to bind to bridge, we use this interface is to use it's ip for generating octavia.conf | 10:10 |
| sri_ | wuchunya_: But when creating a octavia_amp_network it require provider_physical_network right ! exp: https://docs.openstack.org/kolla-ansible/latest/reference/networking/octavia.html | 10:14 |
| wuchunya_ | octavia can also use a tenant network as octavia manage network, does your deployment used for production ? | 10:17 |
| sri_ | wuchunya_: i've used tenant network in octavia everything works fine, and no this not a production deployment I was just trying to simulate production deployment to understand octavia networking. | 10:20 |
| wuchunya_ | sri_: how to setup two external network,? FYI: neutron_external_interface: eth1,eth2 neutron_bridge_name: br-ex, br-phy and configure ml2.conf finally, | 10:22 |
| wuchunya_ | [ml2_type_flat] flat_networks = public,lb and [ovs] section: bridge_mappings: physnet2:br-phy | 10:24 |
| wuchunya_ | sorry, flat_networks should be physnet1, physnet2 | 10:24 |
| sri_ | wuchunya_: I think this is what I am missing, I was not sure whether I can neutron_external_interface: "eth1,eth2" for octavia | 10:27 |
| sri_ | wuchunya_: Thanks for the tip, 👍 | 10:28 |
| wuchunya_ | After I look at the code， you don't need to configure ml2.conf, kolla will do it automatically. | 10:33 |
| wuchunya_ | you are welcome. | 10:34 |
| *** brinzhang_ is now known as brinzhang | 10:39 | |
| opendevreview | Mark Goddard proposed openstack/kolla stable/train: CentOS Stream 8: drop CentOS RabbitMQ 3.8 repo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/832650 | 10:51 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kayobe master: Add support for Rocky Linux 8 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/831652 | 10:54 |
| choooze | Hello guys. | 11:12 |
| choooze | We're trying to find out now is there a possibility to separate ELK-services to different nodes. Including new VIP for ELK and so on? | 11:13 |
| mgoddard | choooze: different nodes - yes. Change the hosts in the relevant groups in the inventory | 11:14 |
| mgoddard | choooze: new VIP - not currently | 11:14 |
| choooze | Thanks. | 11:15 |
| choooze | If we will try to add that possibility in your playbooks is there a chance that you will include our changes in upstream? | 11:15 |
| mgoddard | choooze: it would probably be a fairly difficult change to make. I expect we'd be open to it though | 11:19 |
| choooze | mgoddard: thank you! We will try then. | 11:19 |
| mgoddard | choooze: I would suggest discussing the design with the upstream maintainers, before putting too much effort into it. | 11:20 |
| mgoddard | choooze: weekly meetings would be a good place to start | 11:20 |
| choooze | mgoddard: got it | 11:20 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kayobe master: Add support for Rocky Linux 8 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/831652 | 11:27 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: WIP: Run testssl.sh against HAProxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/823499 | 11:35 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: WIP: Run testssl.sh against HAProxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/823499 | 11:35 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: WIP: Run testssl.sh against HAProxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/823499 | 13:06 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: WIP: Run testssl.sh against HAProxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/823499 | 14:22 |
| opendevreview | Ivan Halomi proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Adding support of podman deployment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/799229 | 14:24 |
| kevko_ | some already existing tool to migrate oooold kolla-ansible ceph to "external" ceph | 14:35 |
| opendevreview | Mark Goddard proposed openstack/kayobe master: Revert "Add the bonding 802.3ad aggregation selection option" https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/832729 | 14:35 |
| kevko_ | or let's say transfer kolla-ansible depend ceph to cephadm ? | 14:35 |
| kevko_ | or i will need to do it manually ? | 14:35 |
| mnasiadka | manually, you're on your own | 14:36 |
| mnasiadka | (if it's kolla-ansible deployed Ceph that we dropped long time ago) | 14:36 |
| kevko_ | yes it is :D | 14:37 |
| mnasiadka | have fun :) | 14:40 |
| kevko_ | :D | 14:46 |
| mnasiadka | mgoddard mnasiadka hrw egonzalez yoctozepto rafaelweingartne cosmicsound osmanlicilegi bbezak parallax Fl1nt frickler adrian-a - meeting in 10 | 14:50 |
| mgoddard | mnasiadka: unfortunately I can't make it today | 14:50 |
| mnasiadka | mgoddard: we'll miss you | 14:50 |
| mnasiadka | #startmeeting kolla | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Mar 9 15:00:00 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mnasiadka. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'kolla' | 15:00 |
| mnasiadka | #topic rollcall | 15:00 |
| mnasiadka | o/ | 15:00 |
| kevko_ | #help | 15:00 |
| halomiva | \o | 15:01 |
| hinermar | o/ | 15:01 |
| kevko | \o/ | 15:01 |
| yoctozepto | o/ | 15:01 |
| ohorecny2 | o/ | 15:01 |
| yarovkon | o/ | 15:01 |
| mnasiadka | #topic agenda | 15:03 |
| mnasiadka | * Review action items from the last meeting | 15:03 |
| mnasiadka | * CI status | 15:03 |
| mnasiadka | * Release tasks | 15:03 |
| mnasiadka | * Current cycle planning | 15:03 |
| mnasiadka | * Additional agenda (from whiteboard) | 15:03 |
| mnasiadka | * Open discussion | 15:03 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Review action items from the last meeting | 15:03 |
| mnasiadka | mnasiadka to triage security bugs and update them with resolution plan (if needed) | 15:03 |
| mnasiadka | Enable osbpo in Debian APT sources, abandon extrepo command use then? | 15:03 |
| mnasiadka | mnasiadka to update kolla review dashboard with kolla collection | 15:03 |
| mnasiadka | I triaged security bugs, but mgoddard created a new one :) | 15:04 |
| mnasiadka | Dashboard not updated. | 15:04 |
| mnasiadka | the osbpo task was on hrw | 15:04 |
| mnasiadka | does anybody know if he has done it? | 15:04 |
| yoctozepto | I've seen something | 15:04 |
| yoctozepto | abandoned | 15:04 |
| yoctozepto | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/831548 | 15:05 |
| yoctozepto | shift of approach | 15:05 |
| mnasiadka | so extrepo will have offline config, ok | 15:05 |
| mnasiadka | so then it's still sort of in progress | 15:05 |
| yoctozepto | yup | 15:06 |
| mnasiadka | #action mnasiadka to triage security bugs and update them with resolution plan (if needed) | 15:06 |
| mnasiadka | #action mnasiadka to update kolla review dashboard with kolla collection | 15:06 |
| mnasiadka | #action hrw Enable osbpo in Debian APT sources, abandon extrepo command use then? | 15:06 |
| mnasiadka | #topic CI Status | 15:06 |
| mnasiadka | How's our CI yoctozepto ? | 15:07 |
| yoctozepto | mnasiadka: happy | 15:07 |
| mnasiadka | goodie | 15:07 |
| yoctozepto | no idea about kayobe though | 15:07 |
| mnasiadka | I've seen an occasional OOM on TLS job, but nothing very concerning. | 15:08 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Release tasks | 15:08 |
| mnasiadka | None this week. | 15:08 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Current cycle planning | 15:08 |
| mnasiadka | Most of the leftovers have been postponed to Z, but let's get anything we can in Y. | 15:09 |
| mnasiadka | yoctozepto: some more changes from mgoddard on baremetal role split | 15:09 |
| yoctozepto | mnasiadka: where? | 15:10 |
| mnasiadka | whiteboard L428 | 15:10 |
| yoctozepto | oh my | 15:12 |
| yoctozepto | does not seem look like a priority to me, to be honest, add me as a reviewer and I will get to it | 15:12 |
| mnasiadka | ok | 15:12 |
| mnasiadka | I think it's important for Kayobe to reach the last patch on the list to be merged | 15:13 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Additional agenda (from whiteboard) | 15:13 |
| mnasiadka | (yoctozepto) Having both PXE and iPXE working at the same time https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832159/ | 15:13 |
| yoctozepto | yes, I think that's something sensible to do | 15:14 |
| yoctozepto | especially for people having existing pxe deployments | 15:15 |
| yoctozepto | and wanting to progressively move to ipxe | 15:15 |
| yoctozepto | the downside is we need to touch the volumes | 15:15 |
| mnasiadka | as long as it works and doesn't break anything | 15:15 |
| yoctozepto | yeah | 15:15 |
| yoctozepto | the question is whether there is some state that we should preserve | 15:16 |
| yoctozepto | in tftpboot and httpboot | 15:16 |
| yoctozepto | to me it looks easy/not-expensive to regenerate | 15:16 |
| mnasiadka | I'm not an Ironic expert | 15:16 |
| yoctozepto | but I would like to know your opinions | 15:16 |
| yoctozepto | yeah | 15:16 |
| yoctozepto | sadly mgoddard is not around | 15:16 |
| mnasiadka | so ideally we would need mgoddard to look into this | 15:16 |
| yoctozepto | that was the point | 15:17 |
| mnasiadka | ok then, I guess he'll try, given the notifications he already did get ;-) | 15:17 |
| *** hrww is now known as hrw | 15:17 | |
| yoctozepto | mnasiadka: yeah ;-) | 15:18 |
| mnasiadka | (yarovkon) Migration path for kolla-ansible from docker to podman (https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/Kolla-ansible_migration_plan_docker-podman) | 15:18 |
| mnasiadka | that's next | 15:18 |
| yarovkon | Wanted to ask if that path looks fine for you | 15:19 |
| mnasiadka | I think we need to automate those first two steps, you don't expect people to do it manually on let's say - 300 servers? | 15:20 |
| ohorecny2 | of course that it will be automated in ansible | 15:20 |
| ohorecny2 | we even have it already (not in gerrit yet) | 15:21 |
| kevko | ohorecny2: post to gerrit ..i'm curious | 15:21 |
| mnasiadka | yes, post it to gerrit and let's review | 15:22 |
| mnasiadka | but I doubt we will get to podman in Y | 15:22 |
| yoctozepto | uninstalling docker cannot be the first step | 15:23 |
| yoctozepto | as it will down containers | 15:23 |
| yoctozepto | we should be able to migrate container by container | 15:23 |
| kevko | it doesn't matter i think | 15:23 |
| yoctozepto | kevko: how so? | 15:24 |
| mnasiadka | yoctozepto: installing both podman and docker on the same host (at least in CentOS world) is problematic | 15:24 |
| kevko | it was reply to mnasiadka that it will be not in Y | 15:24 |
| yoctozepto | kevko: ack | 15:24 |
| ohorecny2 | yes, it doesn't matter we tested it with active VMs (instances) and they were still alive, during whole migration process | 15:24 |
| yoctozepto | mnasiadka: hmm, that's sad - what's the issue? | 15:24 |
| mnasiadka | yoctozepto: containerd mumbo jumbo | 15:24 |
| kevko | haha, kolla will be tested directly from kolla itself :D ...so we will see how HA works :D :D :D | 15:25 |
| mnasiadka | here is some writeup, it's a bit problematic: https://faun.pub/how-to-install-simultaneously-docker-and-podman-on-rhel-8-centos-8-cb67412f321e | 15:25 |
| yoctozepto | ohorecny2: well, vms yes but not all other processes ;-) | 15:25 |
| yoctozepto | mnasiadka: ack, sad | 15:25 |
| yoctozepto | kevko: where? | 15:25 |
| kevko | well, problem will be with rabbitmq, mysql and haproxy | 15:25 |
| kevko | and definitively has to be run with limit to one host | 15:26 |
| ohorecny2 | yes, but small outage during migration process is ok, I think | 15:26 |
| mnasiadka | as long as everything works afterwards, with rabbitmq it's not granted ;-) | 15:27 |
| kevko | i'm just trying to say that on the end of process there should be tasks which will check everything is working well | 15:27 |
| kevko | and when i am thinking about it ..same tests should run before these actions are going happen | 15:27 |
| mnasiadka | we need to start with something, post the patch to gerrit and let's work on it collectively | 15:27 |
| kevko | mnasiadka: for example I know that kolla-ansible changed autoheal politics (sorry i don't know the exact keyword in config) to something different | 15:28 |
| ohorecny2 | yes, it is ok to do some healthchecks before and after migration | 15:28 |
| kevko | (for rabbitmq) | 15:28 |
| mnasiadka | autoheal? it's not Kubernetes | 15:28 |
| mnasiadka | ah, for rmq | 15:28 |
| kevko | so on deployments with three rabbitmqs (small ones) rabbit will stop working immediately | 15:28 |
| kevko | for rabbitmq | 15:29 |
| kevko | mnasiadka: rabbitmq_cluster_partition_handling: "pause_minority" << this | 15:30 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla stable/train: CentOS Stream 8: drop CentOS RabbitMQ 3.8 repo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/832650 | 15:30 |
| kevko | in moment where rabbitmq will not see a node ..rabbitmq will be unresponsive .. | 15:30 |
| mnasiadka | kevko: pause_minority is partition handling, there's no partition if you stop one node. | 15:30 |
| mnasiadka | it should only cause havoc on network issues | 15:31 |
| mnasiadka | but we've diverted the topic | 15:31 |
| ohorecny2 | yes, there can be some errors, because it will be for some time down, but after migration it is going up again | 15:32 |
| mnasiadka | as long as we have some CI that is testing the move - we can work out the quirks I guess | 15:32 |
| mnasiadka | so, post a patch - and let's discuss in the review (and probably on next meetings) | 15:33 |
| kevko | hmm ok | 15:33 |
| mnasiadka | There's another podman-ish topic | 15:34 |
| mnasiadka | (halomiva,hinermar) structure of podman testing and moving baremetal role to openstack collection | 15:34 |
| mnasiadka | what about this one? | 15:34 |
| halomiva | i think we should talk about systemd first | 15:34 |
| halomiva | because podman depends on it | 15:35 |
| mnasiadka | yes, systemd is something we should be able to land in Y | 15:35 |
| mnasiadka | so what's the status of systemd implementation? | 15:36 |
| halomiva | tests are passing but reviews are not coming so we would really appreciate some reviews | 15:36 |
| halomiva | because we implemented everything you asked for | 15:36 |
| mnasiadka | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/816724 - this one? | 15:37 |
| halomiva | yes | 15:37 |
| mnasiadka | yoctozepto: have cycles to look there again? | 15:38 |
| yoctozepto | mnasiadka: currently not | 15:40 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible master: Explicitly unset net.ipv4.ip_forward sysctl https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832087 | 15:40 |
| mnasiadka | ok, I'll do some testing and review that until end of the week. | 15:40 |
| mnasiadka | and ask mgoddard to do the same | 15:41 |
| hinermar | Thank you | 15:41 |
| hinermar | And regarding the testing of podman patch, since the single file for kolla_docker would be too large I have split up the specific test parts and put them in directory /tests/kolla_docker_tests/ | 15:41 |
| hinermar | I just want check with you if that's alright | 15:41 |
| mnasiadka | sure, who likes big files | 15:42 |
| hinermar | Great, thank you | 15:43 |
| halomiva | since baremetal role was move to collection and is under refactor, does it make sense to try push our patch to it for installing podman? | 15:43 |
| halomiva | or should we keep baremetal role in kolla-ansible for testing purposes? | 15:44 |
| mnasiadka | baremetal role is already out, removed | 15:45 |
| mnasiadka | so you need to add podman installation to kolla Ansible collection | 15:45 |
| mnasiadka | and without that, you won't be able to test the podman patch ;-) | 15:45 |
| halomiva | yea but there are some changes coming to that role no? | 15:45 |
| halomiva | so should I wait for the changes to come or push it now | 15:46 |
| mnasiadka | yes, look if there are any patches conflicting with your work, and adapt to that direction? | 15:46 |
| mnasiadka | I don't think mgoddard is planning a lot more work with the collection this cycle | 15:47 |
| mnasiadka | https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/ansible-collection-kolla | 15:47 |
| mnasiadka | halomiva: probably best would be to create new role(s) for podman in the collection | 15:50 |
| mnasiadka | ok then | 15:50 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Open discussion | 15:51 |
| mnasiadka | Anybody? Anything? | 15:51 |
| ohorecny2 | yes, just ask for review | 15:51 |
| ohorecny2 | beside these podman changes to kolla-ansible | 15:51 |
| ohorecny2 | we have additional to kolla | 15:51 |
| ohorecny2 | for image building by podman | 15:51 |
| ohorecny2 | from our point of view they are ready, is there possibility to merge them to Y release? | 15:52 |
| mnasiadka | url? | 15:52 |
| ohorecny2 | I think it is quite independent thing | 15:52 |
| ohorecny2 | mnasiadka: https://review.opendev.org/q/owner:konstantin.yarovoy%2540tietoevry.com | 15:52 |
| mnasiadka | ok, I see them - will try to review before next meeting | 15:54 |
| ohorecny2 | thank you very much | 15:54 |
| mnasiadka | yoctozepto: I'm nearly finished with the fqdn based single external frontend on HAProxy (https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/823395) - would be nice if you could look into that | 15:55 |
| mnasiadka | I'll add a CI job as well, guess without that it's going to be hard to merge ;) | 15:56 |
| mnasiadka | path based should be easy to add, probably I'll do that when adding CI job | 15:56 |
| mnasiadka | ok, let's finish for today | 15:57 |
| mnasiadka | thanks for coming! | 15:57 |
| mnasiadka | #endmeeting | 15:57 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Mar 9 15:57:53 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:57 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2022/kolla.2022-03-09-15.00.html | 15:57 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2022/kolla.2022-03-09-15.00.txt | 15:57 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2022/kolla.2022-03-09-15.00.log.html | 15:57 |
| yoctozepto | mnasiadka: thanks | 16:01 |
| yoctozepto | and would be nice indeed | 16:01 |
| opendevreview | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/xena: Explicitly unset net.ipv4.ip_forward sysctl https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832813 | 16:14 |
| opendevreview | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/wallaby: Explicitly unset net.ipv4.ip_forward sysctl https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832814 | 16:15 |
| opendevreview | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/wallaby: Explicitly unset net.ipv4.ip_forward sysctl https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832814 | 16:16 |
| opendevreview | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/victoria: Explicitly unset net.ipv4.ip_forward sysctl https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832815 | 16:16 |
| opendevreview | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/ussuri: Explicitly unset net.ipv4.ip_forward sysctl https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832816 | 16:16 |
| opendevreview | Rafael Weingartner proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Customize the authentication error timeout page in modOIDC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832806 | 16:17 |
| opendevreview | Rafael Weingartner proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Customize the authentication error timeout page in modOIDC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832806 | 16:19 |
| opendevreview | Rafael Weingartner proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Customize the authentication error timeout page in modOIDC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832806 | 16:21 |
| opendevreview | Rafael Weingartner proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Customize the authentication error timeout page in modOIDC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832806 | 16:22 |
| opendevreview | Rafael Weingartner proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Customize the authentication error timeout page in modOIDC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832806 | 16:23 |
| jamesbenson | Good morning all, just wondering if anyone has issues using the TLS options: kolla_enable_tls_internal/external/backend. And which ones do you typically use? And do you use it with a FQDN or just the IP addr for testing purposes.... | 17:08 |
| opendevreview | Mark Goddard proposed openstack/kolla stable/train: CentOS Stream 8: drop build deps repo https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/832833 | 17:24 |
| jingvar | jamesbenson: tls/internal/external with ip or fqdn - no issues / xena/waalaby | 18:37 |
| opendevreview | Rafael Weingartner proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Customize the authentication error timeout page in modOIDC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832806 | 18:53 |
| opendevreview | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/xena: [CI] Test Ironic on Debian https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832817 | 20:00 |
| opendevreview | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/wallaby: [CI] Test Ironic on Debian https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832818 | 20:01 |
| opendevreview | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/kolla stable/xena: [CI] Test Ironic on Debian https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/832819 | 20:01 |
| opendevreview | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/kolla stable/wallaby: [CI] Test Ironic on Debian https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/832820 | 20:01 |
| opendevreview | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/xena: [CI] Test Ironic when touching Neutron https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832821 | 20:17 |
| opendevreview | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/wallaby: [CI] Test Ironic when touching Neutron https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832822 | 20:17 |
| opendevreview | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/xena: [CI] Use Tenks in Ironic job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832849 | 20:22 |
| opendevreview | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/wallaby: [CI] Use Tenks in Ironic job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832823 | 20:24 |
| opendevreview | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/xena: [CI] Test Ironic when touching Neutron https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832821 | 20:25 |
| opendevreview | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/xena: [CI] Use Tenks in Ironic job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832849 | 20:25 |
| opendevreview | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/wallaby: [CI] Test Ironic when touching Neutron https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832822 | 20:25 |
| opendevreview | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/wallaby: [CI] Use Tenks in Ironic job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832823 | 20:26 |
| opendevreview | Mark Goddard proposed openstack/kolla-ansible stable/xena: Explicitly unset net.ipv4.ip_forward sysctl https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832813 | 20:30 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/xena: Explicitly unset net.ipv4.ip_forward sysctl https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832813 | 21:44 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/wallaby: Explicitly unset net.ipv4.ip_forward sysctl https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832814 | 21:44 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/victoria: Explicitly unset net.ipv4.ip_forward sysctl https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832815 | 21:44 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/ussuri: Explicitly unset net.ipv4.ip_forward sysctl https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/832816 | 21:44 |
| opendevreview | Verification of a change to openstack/kayobe master failed: CI: Move to pytest-testinfra https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/832225 | 22:53 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!