| *** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 06:04 | |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla master: WIP: Move to ansible-core and collections https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/807279 | 06:29 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Remove haproxy,keepalived groups https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/807344 | 06:52 |
| mnasiadka | morning | 07:01 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kayobe stable/victoria: CI: Add CentOS Stream 8 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/807829 | 07:14 |
| mgoddard | morning | 08:28 |
| opendevreview | Michal Arbet proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Remove haproxy,keepalived groups https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/807344 | 08:33 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Bump up Ansible to 4.x / ansible-core 2.11 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/796758 | 08:37 |
| mnasiadka | mgoddard, yoctozepto: should I pursue getting rid of ansible in favor of ansible-core in K-A, or are we sticking to Ansible 5 as maximum (which includes ansible-core 2.11 plus a lot of collections)? | 08:38 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Bump up Ansible max supported ver to 5.x https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/796758 | 08:44 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla master: toolbox: Move to ansible-core 2.11 and collections https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/807279 | 08:47 |
| mnasiadka | well, we could support both, just deliver a requirements.yml for installing collections... | 08:48 |
| mgoddard | mnasiadka: 5.x is not released yet | 08:56 |
| mgoddard | mnasiadka: at this stage in the cycle I would suggest staying with ansible | 08:57 |
| mgoddard | what do we benefit from ansible-core? | 08:57 |
| mnasiadka | Nothing really, apart being able to pin to specific versions of collections, if there are new features/fixed bugs | 08:58 |
| yoctozepto | slimmer installs for sure | 08:58 |
| mnasiadka | and I mixed up Ansible versions, we need to support max 4 - because 5 will come with ansible-core 2.12 | 08:58 |
| mnasiadka | let me update the change | 08:58 |
| opendevreview | Mark Goddard proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: monasca: stop checking Elasticsearch index https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/807689 | 09:04 |
| opendevreview | Michal Nasiadka proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Bump up Ansible max supported ver to 4.x https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/796758 | 09:25 |
| mnasiadka | ok, sorted out the numbering mess | 09:26 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/victoria: Fix kolla-toolbox with IPv6 and disabled RabbitMQ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/807640 | 10:09 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/ussuri: Fix kolla-toolbox with IPv6 and disabled RabbitMQ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/807641 | 10:10 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 12:09 | |
| opendevreview | Mark Goddard proposed openstack/kayobe master: Allow passing arguments to dev/environment-setup.sh https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/807864 | 12:26 |
| blmt | is anyone here using a clustered OVN deployment (i.e. one with 3 controllers nodes that leverages the clustered ovsdb) ? ref. https://docs.openvswitch.org/en/latest/ref/ovsdb.7/ | 12:27 |
| blmt | of course deployed via kolla :) | 12:27 |
| opendevreview | Mark Goddard proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: CI: monasca: stop checking Elasticsearch index https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/807689 | 12:32 |
| opendevreview | alecorps proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add support for VMware NSXP https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/807404 | 13:18 |
| *** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 13:20 | |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/wallaby: Fix kolla-toolbox with IPv6 and disabled RabbitMQ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/807639 | 13:20 |
| opendevreview | Verification of a change to openstack/kolla-ansible stable/victoria failed: Zun: Temporarily skip capsule test for ubuntu https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/807756 | 13:21 |
| mnasiadka | yoctozepto: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/786719 - do we need that still? | 13:48 |
| yoctozepto | mnasiadka: it's a cleanup, approve | 13:58 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/wallaby: Zun: Temporarily skip capsule test for ubuntu https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/807755 | 14:20 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/ussuri: Zun: Temporarily skip capsule test for ubuntu https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/807757 | 14:20 |
| opendevreview | Mark Goddard proposed openstack/kayobe master: Allow passing arguments to dev/environment-setup.sh https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kayobe/+/807864 | 14:43 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla master: ceph: Update CentOS packages to Pacific https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/807043 | 14:50 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla stable/victoria: [doc] Fix Ceph sources https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/807088 | 14:50 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla stable/ussuri: [doc] Fix Ceph sources https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/807087 | 14:50 |
| mnasiadka | mgoddard mnasiadka hrw egonzalez yoctozepto rafaelweingartne cosmicsound osmanlicilegi bbezak parallax Fl1nt - meeting in 7 | 14:53 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla master: Move clustercheck script to mariadb-base https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/805613 | 14:53 |
| opendevreview | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/kolla master: [CI] Drop support for publishing versioned image tags https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/786719 | 14:54 |
| * hrw out | 14:54 | |
| mnasiadka | #startmeeting kolla | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Sep 8 15:00:00 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is mnasiadka. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'kolla' | 15:00 |
| mnasiadka | #topic rollcall | 15:00 |
| mgoddard | \o | 15:01 |
| mnasiadka | o/ | 15:02 |
| parallax | . | 15:03 |
| yoctozepto | o/ | 15:04 |
| *** imtiazc is now known as Guest6698 | 15:04 | |
| mnasiadka | ok, I think it's time to start :) | 15:05 |
| mnasiadka | #topic agenda | 15:05 |
| *** Guest6698 is now known as imtiazc_ | 15:05 | |
| mnasiadka | * Announcements | 15:05 |
| mnasiadka | * Review action items from the last meeting | 15:05 |
| mnasiadka | * CI status | 15:05 |
| mnasiadka | * Forward upgrade testing ( re: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla-ansible/+bug/1941706 ) | 15:05 |
| mnasiadka | * DockerHub limits hurting users https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla-ansible/+bug/1942134 | 15:05 |
| mnasiadka | * Future of Monasca - in context of CI failures and Elasticsearch switch to AWS Opensearch | 15:05 |
| mnasiadka | * Release tasks | 15:05 |
| mnasiadka | * Xena cycle planning | 15:05 |
| mnasiadka | * Yoga PTG planning | 15:05 |
| mnasiadka | * Open discussion | 15:05 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Announcements | 15:05 |
| mnasiadka | No announcements from me - well, seems there was a mail with PTL announcements - so it's official now. | 15:06 |
| mnasiadka | Anybody has anything else? | 15:06 |
| mnasiadka | Guess not. | 15:07 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Review action items from the last meeting | 15:07 |
| mnasiadka | No action items. | 15:08 |
| mnasiadka | #topic CI status | 15:08 |
| mnasiadka | Seems all green based on the whiteboard. | 15:08 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Forward upgrade testing ( re: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla-ansible/+bug/1941706 ) | 15:10 |
| mnasiadka | yoctozepto: I guess it's yours. | 15:10 |
| *** imtiazc_ is now known as imtiazc | 15:12 | |
| yoctozepto | oh, sorry | 15:12 |
| yoctozepto | I wanted to speak up on CI status but missed it | 15:13 |
| mnasiadka | You still can :) | 15:13 |
| yoctozepto | yeah :-) | 15:13 |
| yoctozepto | so, relating to CI status; the gates are green, obviously :-) | 15:13 |
| yoctozepto | I asked hongbin for help with the zun scenario (because it was red on ubuntu and prevented us to see other issues) | 15:13 |
| *** imtiazc is now known as Guest6700 | 15:13 | |
| yoctozepto | and so he proposed to drop the capsule testing as upstream did as well | 15:14 |
| *** Guest6700 is now known as imtiazc_ | 15:14 | |
| yoctozepto | I merged the change on all supported branches | 15:14 |
| yoctozepto | you can see it in the workarounds | 15:14 |
| yoctozepto | now the zun scenario is green | 15:14 |
| mnasiadka | Great to hear. | 15:14 |
| yoctozepto | remember zun scenario tests multinode cinder with iscsi | 15:14 |
| yoctozepto | so it's useful for this purpose | 15:14 |
| yoctozepto | ok, another | 15:14 |
| yoctozepto | cinder failure in xena | 15:14 |
| yoctozepto | it got promoted to critical before release | 15:15 |
| yoctozepto | the cinder folks are debating on the best approach to it | 15:15 |
| yoctozepto | but it's in progress | 15:15 |
| mnasiadka | Good, let's track it - I'll subscribe to the bug. | 15:15 |
| yoctozepto | our cephadm upgrade seems to work when any patch is applied | 15:15 |
| yoctozepto | they just need to merge something finally (-: | 15:15 |
| mnasiadka | What I'm more concerned with is the Monasca scenario, but maybe let's discsus that during the Monasca/Elasticsearch topic parallax raised. | 15:16 |
| yoctozepto | remember it's our only multinode upgrade job | 15:16 |
| yoctozepto | yeah, Monasca is to be discussed later so I'm not starting this now | 15:16 |
| yoctozepto | Debian I will fix another time | 15:16 |
| yoctozepto | that's all for CI status; now onto the "current topic" | 15:16 |
| yoctozepto | so "Forward upgrade testing ( re: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla-ansible/+bug/1941706 )" | 15:16 |
| yoctozepto | what I mean in here is that it's obviously very recommended to merge additional testing | 15:17 |
| yoctozepto | but I think we need one more job variant - forward upgrades | 15:17 |
| yoctozepto | so that we actually exercise the proposed code's ability to allow to be *upgraded-from* | 15:17 |
| yoctozepto | i.e., even with the stricter testing we would not catch that libvirt issue immediately | 15:18 |
| yoctozepto | only after it merged on wallaby, would we see failures on master and scratch our heads | 15:18 |
| mgoddard | do we have a feel for how many bugs this would have caught | 15:18 |
| yoctozepto | likely not that many tbh; thus have not worked on that upfront and just put a discussion point | 15:19 |
| yoctozepto | that we have this obvious hole in testing | 15:19 |
| yoctozepto | we can always just "ack" it and go ahead; other projects don't seem to do forward testing either | 15:20 |
| yoctozepto | (unless perhaps tripleo does but their CI scares me) | 15:20 |
| mnasiadka | tripleo's CI is not the scariest element of tripleo ;-) | 15:20 |
| yoctozepto | hard to tell really | 15:20 |
| mgoddard | would it prevent us from merging some changes? we already have some cases where we have to push a fix back to N-3 before it can be merged in later branches | 15:21 |
| mnasiadka | That's my concern, we are doing reverse-backports from time to time, so this could complicate such scenarios. | 15:22 |
| yoctozepto | yeah, I was wondering the same thing but I would recommend the wisdom of the elders - when you have an emergency and know the root cause, disable the blocking jobs and merge the necessary fixes ;-) | 15:22 |
| yoctozepto | my biggest concern is general stability and gate time hit would not be compensated by the extra testing scope | 15:22 |
| yoctozepto | if we are all sceptic, then it's perhaps best to just ack this point and move on | 15:23 |
| yoctozepto | get back to it when we hit another similar issue | 15:23 |
| yoctozepto | (could be like in 3 years time and we don't even remember lol) | 15:24 |
| mgoddard | while we may merge some breaking changes currently, we would at least catch them when running upgrade jobs in later branches | 15:24 |
| mgoddard | assuming our CI catches the issue | 15:24 |
| yoctozepto | yeah, the issue is: only after and you have to guess which change broke | 15:24 |
| yoctozepto | otherwise definitely | 15:24 |
| mgoddard | which it didn't with the libvirt issue, since you added testing to catch it | 15:25 |
| yoctozepto | yes | 15:25 |
| yoctozepto | i.e. | 15:25 |
| yoctozepto | with new testing in place for now, we would have this situation | 15:25 |
| yoctozepto | 1) we actually break master | 15:25 |
| yoctozepto | 2) we backport the breakage to wallaby | 15:25 |
| yoctozepto | 3) we merge the breakage in wallaby because everything is nice and dandy | 15:26 |
| yoctozepto | 4) suddenly we see master jobs break | 15:26 |
| yoctozepto | 5) we investigate and figure out (after some time) that it was a change merged on wallaby that broke it | 15:26 |
| yoctozepto | so | 15:26 |
| mnasiadka | So from my perspective it's already better ;-) | 15:26 |
| yoctozepto | at least we are already reducing the time window for affecting users | 15:26 |
| yoctozepto | it is | 15:26 |
| yoctozepto | the point was if we want to make it even tighter | 15:27 |
| yoctozepto | but it comes with all the already mentioned drawbacks ;-) | 15:27 |
| opendevreview | wu.chunyang proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Remove chrony role from kolla https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/791743 | 15:27 |
| mnasiadka | So, let's agree to revisit it if we think about it again/happen to be in a similar situation? | 15:28 |
| yoctozepto | works for me; glad now you also understand the matter :-) | 15:29 |
| mnasiadka | #agreed to not pursue forward-upgrade-testing currently and get back to it when we hit another similar issue. | 15:29 |
| mnasiadka | #topic DockerHub limits hurting users https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla-ansible/+bug/1942134 | 15:29 |
| mnasiadka | yoctozepto: you again! | 15:29 |
| yoctozepto | mgoddard: also agrees? | 15:29 |
| yoctozepto | mnasiadka: me again, yes (-: | 15:29 |
| mgoddard | agree | 15:30 |
| yoctozepto | ok, so users are legitimately giving up on kolla because of dockerhub | 15:30 |
| mnasiadka | good that we all agree to agreeing. | 15:30 |
| yoctozepto | what could we do? could we just point to quay.io? | 15:30 |
| yoctozepto | and forget dockerhub? | 15:30 |
| mnasiadka | I thought that will sooner or later come to that point. | 15:30 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 15:30 | |
| yoctozepto | mnasiadka: me kinda too | 15:31 |
| mnasiadka | Will it be better with quay.io for a regular user? | 15:31 |
| mnasiadka | Well, CI is better - so I guess it kind of will. | 15:31 |
| yoctozepto | same thinking here ;-) | 15:31 |
| yoctozepto | it also gets those daily updates :D | 15:31 |
| mnasiadka | I think we should also encourage in the docs, with bold blinking letters on orange background, to build your own images and setup your own registry. | 15:31 |
| yoctozepto | wild mgoddard needs to appear in the discussion too | 15:32 |
| yoctozepto | mnasiadka: ++ | 15:32 |
| mgoddard | I'm reading | 15:32 |
| yoctozepto | +2 for blinking, like it's 90s still (-: | 15:32 |
| mnasiadka | Start writing :) | 15:32 |
| yoctozepto | mnasiadka: mgoddard in read-only mode | 15:32 |
| opendevreview | alecorps proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Add support for VMware NSXP https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/807404 | 15:32 |
| mgoddard | I'm just biding my time before saying quay.io++ | 15:32 |
| yoctozepto | ok, action me on that | 15:33 |
| yoctozepto | and now - what about the docs? mnasiadka to propose better wording? | 15:33 |
| yoctozepto | or mgoddard (as English native)? | 15:33 |
| mgoddard | -1 blinking | 15:33 |
| parallax | how about this: registry deployed by default as a caching proxy to the outer docker hub / quay.io | 15:33 |
| mnasiadka | #action yoctozepto to point all deployments to quay.io | 15:33 |
| yoctozepto | parallax: dockerhub still breaks behind proxy | 15:33 |
| yoctozepto | :-((( | 15:34 |
| mnasiadka | #action mnasiadka to update docs encouraging to build your own containers and run your own registry | 15:34 |
| mnasiadka | should we also write a contrib/ playbook to fetch quay.io containers and push it to your own registry? | 15:34 |
| parallax | tbh - never had these issues when deploying all in one dev envs | 15:34 |
| yoctozepto | mnasiadka: yeah, that could help for sure | 15:34 |
| mgoddard | mnasiadka: build/retag/push was a kolla feature request | 15:34 |
| mgoddard | s/build/pull/ | 15:35 |
| yoctozepto | parallax: yeah, aio does not break, but all-in-two does afair lol (-: | 15:35 |
| yoctozepto | especially with retries | 15:35 |
| mnasiadka | Do we have a volunteer to work on the playbook? Or even a kolla-ansible command? | 15:35 |
| yoctozepto | dockerhub is a joke really | 15:35 |
| mgoddard | kolla command | 15:35 |
| yoctozepto | mgoddard: now we talk pull-push | 15:36 |
| mnasiadka | I don't think we have a blueprint around that feature. | 15:36 |
| yoctozepto | hmm | 15:37 |
| mnasiadka | Ok, so - any volunteer to create a blueprint, write down what it should do - and then we can find a volunteer to write the code? | 15:38 |
| mgoddard | here is the original kayobe RFE: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2007731 | 15:38 |
| mnasiadka | ok then, doesn't sound very detailed, but it's a start. | 15:40 |
| mnasiadka | for the sake of meeting time, I'll create the blueprint and reference it in Kayobe's RFE - if there will be anyone interested in writing that, he can pick it up. | 15:41 |
| mnasiadka | #action mnasiadka to create pull-retag-push blueprint based on kayobe RFE: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2007731 | 15:41 |
| mnasiadka | Is there anything else left in that topic to discuss, or we can move on? | 15:41 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Future of Monasca - in context of CI failures and Elasticsearch switch to AWS Opensearch | 15:42 |
| mnasiadka | parallax: stage is yours | 15:42 |
| parallax | We don't know if there are actual users of it, do we? | 15:43 |
| parallax | Thinking about recent releases, eg. Wallaby | 15:44 |
| mnasiadka | mgoddard: any past user inquiries about Monasca in Kolla? Do you remember? | 15:44 |
| yoctozepto | have you checked bug reports? | 15:45 |
| mnasiadka | There's a Wallaby bug report | 15:45 |
| mgoddard | well, we are jumping the gun a little here - StackHPC is still a monasca user | 15:45 |
| yoctozepto | we have quite a few open it seems | 15:46 |
| mnasiadka | Yes, so we need to assume it needs to live. | 15:46 |
| mgoddard | and other people do use it | 15:46 |
| yoctozepto | mgoddard: I see at least two StackHPC folks wishing to kill Monasca | 15:46 |
| mnasiadka | parallax: what's the main problem (apart of CI liveliness) | 15:46 |
| yoctozepto | anyhow, any idea what broke in CI? | 15:47 |
| parallax | Elasticsearch in Kolla is getting slightly outdated; however, Monasca is depending on it | 15:47 |
| mgoddard | I proposed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/807689 to try to fix the CI | 15:48 |
| parallax | This blocks e.g. migration to OpenSearch | 15:48 |
| mgoddard | parallax: what about centralised logging? | 15:48 |
| yoctozepto | parallax: we can have both streams | 15:48 |
| parallax | Which is not impossible, but likely requires development effort in Monasca | 15:48 |
| yoctozepto | mgoddard: that is WIP and looks like stopping to test Monasca in the Monasca scenario ;p | 15:49 |
| mgoddard | not really | 15:49 |
| yoctozepto | so, uhm, the index in es means nothing? | 15:50 |
| mgoddard | it does, but that is just one part of the test | 15:50 |
| parallax | OK, maybe we could leave ES as it is and proceed with OpenSearch for centralised logging | 15:51 |
| yoctozepto | ok, I now see it's still read there | 15:51 |
| yoctozepto | red* | 15:51 |
| mnasiadka | Anyway, so from what I understand Monasca is persisting on using Elasticsearch - and we'd like to move our central logging to use OpenSearch | 15:51 |
| mnasiadka | Anything that blocks us from keeping Elasticsearch for Monasca (and waiting for them to move in some direction) and add OpenSearch as new container images and use them in central logging feature? | 15:51 |
| mgoddard | in the absence of someone willing to properly investigate, I'd rather have a green job | 15:51 |
| yoctozepto | mnasiadka: ++ | 15:51 |
| yoctozepto | mgoddard: ++ | 15:51 |
| parallax | Not removing / deprecating anything, just adding | 15:52 |
| mgoddard | seems reasonable | 15:52 |
| mnasiadka | #agreed Keep Elasticsearch for Monasca and work on separate container images for OpenSearch and include it in central_logging feature | 15:53 |
| mnasiadka | Great, another one solved. | 15:53 |
| parallax | Nice | 15:53 |
| mnasiadka | Let's go forward... | 15:53 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Release tasks | 15:53 |
| mnasiadka | The winter is coming, err - the feature freeze is coming. | 15:54 |
| mnasiadka | Sep 27 - Oct 01 is R-1 - Feature Freeze date | 15:55 |
| mnasiadka | 3 weeks from now | 15:55 |
| mnasiadka | #topic Xena cycle planning | 15:56 |
| mnasiadka | Should we go quickly through priorities once again? | 15:56 |
| mnasiadka | Ansible - it's on track, three changes awaiting reviews. | 15:56 |
| mnasiadka | or even four. | 15:56 |
| mnasiadka | Ceph packages have been bumped to Pacific | 15:57 |
| mnasiadka | kevko is again not here, and there's a lot of changes in the proxysql series | 15:57 |
| mgoddard | I've been reviewing system scope patches recently | 15:58 |
| yoctozepto | I will not be doing consul this cycle | 15:58 |
| yoctozepto | as masakari delayed this | 15:58 |
| mgoddard | I think we won't be landing system scope this cycle | 15:58 |
| mgoddard | but maybe we can start it if we break it up | 15:59 |
| mnasiadka | I didn't have time to review modernisation of the Swift role - did you mgoddard ? | 15:59 |
| mgoddard | nope | 15:59 |
| mnasiadka | ceph radosgw and gather facts command are awaiting other core reviews | 15:59 |
| mnasiadka | ok, keystone system scope feels like a big thing in just one patch, so it would be nice to break it up and come up with a plan | 16:00 |
| mnasiadka | headphoneJames: online? | 16:00 |
| mnasiadka | well, it's already time to end the meeting | 16:00 |
| mnasiadka | let's try to work on those reviews | 16:01 |
| mnasiadka | #endmeeting kolla | 16:01 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Sep 8 16:01:23 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:01 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2021/kolla.2021-09-08-15.00.html | 16:01 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2021/kolla.2021-09-08-15.00.txt | 16:01 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/kolla/2021/kolla.2021-09-08-15.00.log.html | 16:01 |
| mnasiadka | Thanks for the meeting! | 16:01 |
| parallax | Thanks | 16:01 |
| yoctozepto | thanks mnasiadka | 16:02 |
| mgoddard | thanks! | 16:02 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible master: Use Docker healthchecks for mistral services https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/779075 | 16:07 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible stable/victoria: Zun: Temporarily skip capsule test for ubuntu https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla-ansible/+/807756 | 16:13 |
| headphoneJames | mnasiadka: hi | 16:32 |
| headphoneJames | mnasiadka: I am open to splitting the patch into different parts, but not sure what that would look like | 16:34 |
| *** imtiazc_ is now known as imtiazc | 17:07 | |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/kolla master: [CI] Drop support for publishing versioned image tags https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kolla/+/786719 | 20:00 |
| -opendevstatus- NOTICE: The Gerrit service on review.opendev.org is going offline momentarily for a host migration and zuul upgrade, downtime should be only a few minutes. | 21:05 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!