| *** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 00:00 | |
| *** huzhengchuan has joined #openstack-kolla | 00:06 | |
| *** caowei has joined #openstack-kolla | 00:13 | |
| *** mannamne has quit IRC | 00:31 | |
| openstackgerrit | Steven Dake proposed openstack/kolla-kubernetes master: DNM bisecting kolla-ansible to find regression https://review.openstack.org/432697 | 00:38 |
|---|---|---|
| *** caowei has quit IRC | 00:41 | |
| sbezverk | sdake: already found commit which broke b3 | 00:47 |
| sbezverk | sdake: it is this one f31930ec92c1927db2de260fadd7083eb1c4b3d5 | 00:47 |
| sbezverk | sdake: do you know how to revert it for testing? | 00:48 |
| *** ssurana has joined #openstack-kolla | 00:51 | |
| *** ssurana1 has joined #openstack-kolla | 00:54 | |
| *** eaguilar has joined #openstack-kolla | 00:56 | |
| *** ssurana has quit IRC | 00:58 | |
| *** mnaser has quit IRC | 00:58 | |
| *** mnaser has joined #openstack-kolla | 01:00 | |
| *** mnaser has joined #openstack-kolla | 01:00 | |
| *** FiveBroDeepBook has joined #openstack-kolla | 01:13 | |
| *** FiveBroDeepBook has left #openstack-kolla | 01:13 | |
| *** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-kolla | 01:22 | |
| *** salv-orlando has quit IRC | 01:26 | |
| *** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-kolla | 02:01 | |
| *** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 02:02 | |
| *** ssurana1 has quit IRC | 02:08 | |
| *** goldyfruit has quit IRC | 02:09 | |
| sdake_ | sbezverk i disagree - that is a merge commit | 02:18 |
| sdake_ | sbezverk merge commits are "empty" - they contain no code | 02:18 |
| sdake_ | sbezverk what are the symtomsp of the failure | 02:18 |
| sdake_ | git revert hash | 02:18 |
| sdake_ | sbezverk you can use git show hash to see that it is empty | 02:20 |
| *** ssurana has joined #openstack-kolla | 02:38 | |
| *** MasterOfBugs has joined #openstack-kolla | 03:05 | |
| *** sdake has joined #openstack-kolla | 03:09 | |
| *** sdake_ has quit IRC | 03:09 | |
| *** sp__ has joined #openstack-kolla | 03:14 | |
| *** rhallisey has quit IRC | 03:15 | |
| *** MasterOfBugs has quit IRC | 03:16 | |
| *** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-kolla | 03:23 | |
| *** eaguilar has quit IRC | 03:23 | |
| *** salv-orlando has quit IRC | 03:27 | |
| *** fragatina has joined #openstack-kolla | 03:29 | |
| *** fragatina has quit IRC | 03:34 | |
| *** Pavo has joined #openstack-kolla | 03:34 | |
| sbezverk | sdake_: I take this commit and 100% see exactly the same failure | 03:35 |
| sbezverk | I take one commit before it, everything runs fine | 03:35 |
| sdake | what failure do you see - the resolve dns timeout? | 03:35 |
| sbezverk | no | 03:36 |
| sdake | link me an example gate run failure pls | 03:36 |
| sbezverk | I do not log handy but it is nova that gets broken | 03:36 |
| sbezverk | basically you cannot launch VM | 03:36 |
| sdake | nova in ERROR state no hosts found? | 03:36 |
| sdake | across how many of the gate jobs? | 03:37 |
| sbezverk | found the log http://logs.openstack.org/08/432408/12/check/gate-kolla-kubernetes-deploy-centos-binary-3-ceph-multi-nv/3d02fbb/console.html#_2017-02-11_15_22_48_294593 | 03:37 |
| sbezverk | it is 100% consistant with that commit, one step back and the same job runs clean | 03:37 |
| sdake | so patch set 11 is all green? | 03:38 |
| sdake | sbezverk the gating jobs seem to fail consistently in networking here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/432697/6 | 03:39 |
| sbezverk | ps 16 is all green you can ignore one failure it is not realted | 03:39 |
| sbezverk | here is hash for commit http://logs.openstack.org/08/432408/12/check/gate-kolla-kubernetes-deploy-centos-binary-3-ceph-multi-nv/3d02fbb/console.html#_2017-02-11_15_22_48_294593 | 03:39 |
| sdake | ok moment let me have a look | 03:39 |
| sbezverk | e121ecb380d7f7e962fbd1afe5c402ef6b277171 | 03:40 |
| sdake | that unsupported operand type is what your worried about then? | 03:40 |
| sdake | commit e121ecb380d7f7e962fbd1afe5c402ef6b277171 | 03:40 |
| sdake | Author: Sayantani Goswami <sayantani.goswami@intel.com> | 03:40 |
| sdake | Date: Thu Feb 2 19:29:57 2017 +0000 | 03:40 |
| sdake | Update links in documents | 03:40 |
| sdake | Update documents reference image-building documents correctly after | 03:40 |
| sdake | image-building.rst was deleted from kolla-ansible directory. | 03:40 |
| sdake | Change-Id: Ib66475e1f0f3055f2e38fc33ae649cae300c9c36 | 03:40 |
| sdake | so this works | 03:40 |
| sbezverk | yes | 03:41 |
| sbezverk | but it fails on the next one | 03:41 |
| sdake | and the commit after returns that operand error? | 03:41 |
| sbezverk | yes | 03:41 |
| sdake | let me run that with an actual git rebase operation - i can't get teh gate to pass particularly well as is | 03:41 |
| sdake | is it only 3.0.2 images? | 03:41 |
| sbezverk | yes | 03:42 |
| sbezverk | I think placement is ignored for 2.0.2 images | 03:42 |
| sbezverk | so no impact, but 3.0.2 probably starts using it or be aware of it | 03:42 |
| sbezverk | not sure | 03:42 |
| sbezverk | but it is 100% clear | 03:42 |
| sdake | so this commit then comes out clean in the gate? commit f31930ec92c1927db2de260fadd7083eb1c4b3d5 | 03:43 |
| sbezverk | this is bad commit | 03:43 |
| *** Pavo has quit IRC | 03:43 | |
| sbezverk | the one that breaks | 03:43 |
| sdake | try running what you think works with a git revert facfabf3bbf57d5302f1b53f29396c532ea87352 afterwards | 03:43 |
| sbezverk | last good is e121ecb380d7f7e962fbd1afe5c402ef6b277171 | 03:44 |
| sdake | you may have ot do git revert -m nomsg facfabf3bbf57d5302f1b53f29396c532ea87352 | 03:44 |
| sbezverk | sdake: I tried to do it manually and it gives me error | 03:44 |
| sdake | reverting that commit? | 03:44 |
| sbezverk | yeah | 03:44 |
| sdake | from a master checkout? | 03:44 |
| sbezverk | yes | 03:44 |
| sdake | let me try -moemnt | 03:45 |
| sbezverk | git revert -m nomsg facfabf3bbf57d5302f1b53f29396c532ea87352 | 03:45 |
| sbezverk | error: switch `m' expects a numerical value | 03:45 |
| sdake | ya - running git revert wont work - there is a collsion in the commit which requires manual intervention | 03:46 |
| sdake | sbezverk run these operations locally: | 03:48 |
| sdake | git reset --hard | 03:48 |
| sdake | git show facfabf3bbf57d5302f1b53f29396c532ea87352 | 03:48 |
| sdake | yo uwill see there is no kubernetes conditional around the placement api (to set the proper endpoints) | 03:49 |
| financeMan | sdake "APIError: 500 Server Error: Internal Server Error (\"{\"message\":\"maximum retry count cannot be used with restart policy \\'unless-stopped\" | 03:50 |
| financeMan | trying to deploy | 03:50 |
| sdake | financeMan busy | 03:50 |
| sdake | financeMan would love to help - limited time frame atm | 03:50 |
| sdake | financeMan try ask.openstack.org or try at another time :) | 03:51 |
| sdake | sbezverk you tell me what the nova.conf.j2 should look like | 03:51 |
| sbezverk | sdake: I run these commands on master right? | 03:52 |
| sdake | sbezverk right | 03:52 |
| sdake | sbezverk I think a simple way to validate your theory is to just comment out the placement API in nova-api.conf.j2 | 03:53 |
| sdake | sbezverk the way to do that is to do that in your local copy of the repo, then git format-patch -1, then git am patchname in the gate script | 03:53 |
| sbezverk | sdake: man that is big patch | 03:54 |
| sdake | focus on nova.conf.j2 | 03:54 |
| sdake | what is happening is [placement] is being setup in nova.conf | 03:54 |
| sbezverk | I am not sure if just commenting out placement thing will work | 03:55 |
| sbezverk | there are some wsgi changes as well | 03:55 |
| sdake | that is for the placement api server | 03:55 |
| sdake | that is independent of the nova api server | 03:55 |
| sdake | we can't implement the placement api in 3.0.2 - there are no container images for it | 03:56 |
| sdake | sbezverk comment on lines 218-ish (where [placement] starts in a local copy of kolla-ansible | 03:57 |
| sdake | git commit it | 03:57 |
| sdake | git format-patch -1 | 03:57 |
| sdake | copy that patch into a new gate script | 03:57 |
| financeMan | How do i shutdown a specific container? I think my deploy is failing because the heka container is still running after i tried to stop everything | 03:57 |
| sdake | rather a new gate test | 03:57 |
| sdake | financeMan docker stop [first 2-3 characters of container name from docker ps] | 03:58 |
| sdake | rather container id | 03:58 |
| sdake | financeMan still -busy :) | 03:58 |
| sdake | financeMan are you using master or a stable branch? | 03:58 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | sbezverk, pong | 03:59 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ i've got it | 03:59 |
| sbezverk | sdake: I need it at the gate, I can try to kill it in the init container | 03:59 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | what's happened? | 03:59 |
| sdake | sbezverk would you like me to do it :) | 03:59 |
| sbezverk | Jeffrey4l_: Hey | 03:59 |
| financeMan | sdake I ran "kolla-ansible pull" which I image is master and not a stable branch? | 03:59 |
| sbezverk | sdake: sure | 04:00 |
| sdake | sbezverk cool give me 3-5 mins moment | 04:00 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | sbezverk, what's wrong? | 04:00 |
| sbezverk | Jeffrey4l_: based on git bisect that placement PS breaks our gate | 04:00 |
| sbezverk | f31930ec92c1927db2de260fadd7083eb1c4b3d5 | 04:01 |
| sbezverk | even that fix I pushed recently does not help | 04:01 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | sbezverk, hrm placement is required in Ocata. so i thin k8s need support it. | 04:01 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ these are 3.0.2 images being gated | 04:01 |
| sbezverk | sdake and I are trying to figure out how to revert that PS at least temporarely | 04:01 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ so that wont work - as thre are no placement images in mitaka | 04:01 |
| sdake | sbezverk we dont need to revert it | 04:02 |
| sdake | we need to fix it | 04:02 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | i am confused. | 04:02 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ wait for patchset - yo uwill understand | 04:02 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | 3.0.2 do not require placement. | 04:02 |
| sdake | i can't fix it if i'm typing in irc :) | 04:02 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | ok. | 04:02 |
| sbezverk | Jeffrey4l: check this message | 04:02 |
| sbezverk | http://logs.openstack.org/08/432408/12/check/gate-kolla-kubernetes-deploy-centos-binary-3-ceph-multi-nv/3d02fbb/console.html#_2017-02-11_15_22_48_294593 | 04:02 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | wait for it. | 04:02 |
| sbezverk | Jeffrey4l_: we get this failure constantly with only 3.0.2 images | 04:03 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | are u using 4.0.0 and 3.0.2 in mix? | 04:03 |
| sbezverk | Jeffrey4l_: 3.0.2 images, kolla-ansible master | 04:03 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | sbezverk, that is bad. | 04:04 |
| financeMan | sounds like someone is going to get fired, i better go to bed! | 04:05 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | why not use 3.0.2 kolla ansible? | 04:05 |
| sdake | ok dudes dont panic | 04:05 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | http://logs.openstack.org/08/432408/12/check/gate-kolla-kubernetes-deploy-centos-binary-3-ceph-multi-nv/3d02fbb/logs/openstack/kolla-nova-compute-x6grh.txt check this. | 04:05 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | seems nova compute try to connect placement api. but failed. | 04:05 |
| sdake | financeMan community project - nobody gets fired here :) | 04:05 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | this is the root cause. | 04:05 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | before placement api, compute node resource is tracked by nova database. after placement api, the reources are tracked by placement api. | 04:06 |
| *** huzhengchuan has quit IRC | 04:10 | |
| sbezverk | Jeffrey4l_: we need to disable this behavior for 3.0.2 images | 04:10 |
| sdake | relax | 04:10 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | kolla-ansible 4.0.0 do not promise to deploy 3.0.2 images. | 04:11 |
| sdake | all your questions will be answered | 04:11 |
| sbezverk | Jeffrey4l_: ok we can pin 3.0.2 ansible | 04:11 |
| sdake | no we can't | 04:11 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | why not try to used kolla? | 04:11 |
| sbezverk | sdake: why? | 04:11 |
| openstackgerrit | Steven Dake proposed openstack/kolla-kubernetes master: Comment out placement API in all gate jobs https://review.openstack.org/432721 | 04:12 |
| sdake | this is why ^^ | 04:12 |
| sdake | read the commit log and the patch pls | 04:12 |
| sdake | and then ask qs :) | 04:12 |
| *** crushil has joined #openstack-kolla | 04:13 | |
| Jeffrey4l_ | why not try to use 4.0.0 images? | 04:14 |
| openstackgerrit | Steven Dake proposed openstack/kolla-kubernetes master: Comment out placement API in all gate jobs https://review.openstack.org/432721 | 04:14 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | this patch works in gate. | 04:14 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ - check out this list of gates: | 04:14 |
| sdake | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/432697/6 | 04:14 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | but when some one want to try kolla-k8s, he will get the same error. ( because he do not add such patch) | 04:14 |
| sdake | gate-kolla-kubernetes-deploy-centos-binary-2-ceph-multi-nv | 04:15 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ - right it needs to go into master of kolla-ansible | 04:15 |
| sdake | with an if orchestration-engine == kubernetess then ignore | 04:15 |
| sdake | gate-kolla-kubernetes-deploy-centos-binary-2-ceph-multi-nv | 04:15 |
| sdake | see this gate job - it has 2 in the name | 04:15 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | this is not a good thing ;( | 04:15 |
| sdake | the gate job with 2 in the name tests 2.0.2 images against master of kolla-kubernetes | 04:16 |
| sdake | the gate job with 3 in the name tests 30.0.2 images against master of kolla-kubernetes | 04:16 |
| sdake | there is also a gate job with -t- which is experimental which doesn't work which tests master (4.0.0 images) | 04:16 |
| *** sudipto has joined #openstack-kolla | 04:17 | |
| *** sudipto_ has joined #openstack-kolla | 04:17 | |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ i think tis a break from our tradition of having one version kolla-ansible deploy one version of kolla containers | 04:17 |
| *** huzhengchuan has joined #openstack-kolla | 04:17 | |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ however now that they are separate deliverables, it is a thing that can be done | 04:17 |
| sbezverk | Jeffrey4l_: we need to supprot multiple versions because we want to test upgrade at the gate | 04:17 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | this is different to support different deliverables. | 04:17 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ i didn't parse that last statement - mind restating | 04:18 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | it is supporting different version images. | 04:18 |
| sdake | yup | 04:18 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | we should avoid this. | 04:18 |
| sdake | those are the gates that have been developed | 04:18 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | it make things works. | 04:18 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | worth. | 04:18 |
| sdake | the reality is we are not destroying all those gate jobs in kolla-kubernetes because we don't want a conditional in kolla-ansible | 04:19 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | i am OK to fix this in kolla-ansible with if orchestration-engine == kubernetess. | 04:19 |
| sdake | sounds good :) | 04:19 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | but we need avoid this. | 04:19 |
| sdake | i think we need to discuss further | 04:19 |
| sdake | i have worked with kfox1111 and sbezverk on this exact point and it seems a point of contention | 04:19 |
| sdake | i'm not really sure what to do about it other then roll with it | 04:20 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ by pike genconfig should be gone from kolla-ansible entirely | 04:20 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ and it will no longer be a kolla-ansible deliverable problem | 04:20 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | kolla deliverables should not support different version images in one branch. | 04:20 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ i'd challenge you on that - why not? | 04:21 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | no one and job promise that. | 04:21 |
| sdake | didn't parse - pls restate? | 04:21 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | why we need support? | 04:21 |
| sbezverk | Jeffrey4l_: upgrades | 04:21 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ i dont totally understand the why it is needed | 04:21 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | i.e. kolla-ansible ocata should not support kolla newton images. | 04:22 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | kolla-k8s ocata should not support kolla newton images. | 04:22 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | if so, the end-user will want to try kolla-ansible deploy kolla newton images. | 04:22 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ your making a statement but not explaining why | 04:22 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | it will be end-less support. | 04:23 |
| sdake | i see - i feel the same way | 04:23 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | and openstack do not promise this too. | 04:23 |
| sbezverk | Jeffrey4l_: we do not have such rigid rules.. kolla-kub code can run with either versions | 04:23 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | openstack nova ocata work with neuton mitaka? who knows? | 04:23 |
| sdake | however i didn't write the gates - other people did | 04:23 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ that does not work at all | 04:24 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ the idea is choose newton, or choose ocata, or choose pike | 04:24 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | OK. | 04:24 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | it is still wired. | 04:24 |
| sdake | i agree seems semi-odd | 04:24 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | if so, why should we have kolla-ansible ocata branch? | 04:25 |
| sbezverk | sdake: I left you a comment | 04:25 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | rather then only have one master is enough. | 04:25 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ really good question | 04:25 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | if so, we will have end-less if-else in kolla-ansible's code. | 04:25 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | which to handle if ocata ehn | 04:25 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | if newton then | 04:25 |
| sbezverk | Jeffrey4l_: Because you cannot force people deploying always use master | 04:25 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ right - that was the decision that was made 18 months ago | 04:25 |
| sbezverk | operators want to deploy stable releases | 04:26 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ i get the endless if/else/else/else thing | 04:26 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ we have a ptg design session just about this topic (configuration) | 04:26 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | sbezverk, what i wanna to say is: if kolla-ansible master branch support newton, what's the different with kolla-ansible newton. | 04:27 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ remote dial-in available | 04:27 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | branch* | 04:27 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | sdake, ok. | 04:27 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ we are using the kolla-ansible deliverable for ocata and part of pike to bootstrap the config gen for kolla-kubernetes | 04:27 |
| sdake | i expect by the end of pike, genconfig will be reomved from kolla-ansible entirely | 04:28 |
| sbezverk | sdake: I hope earlier | 04:28 |
| sdake | and instead config gen will be handled directly in kolla-kubernetes | 04:28 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | sdake, i know the genconfig part. i hope that too. ;) | 04:28 |
| sdake | its a transitory problem which makes the jinja2 a little untidy | 04:28 |
| sdake | sadly ocata was a 4 month cycle and the repo split madness - well you lived that | 04:29 |
| sdake | very disruptive | 04:29 |
| sbezverk | sdake: are you going to fix your ps? | 04:30 |
| sdake | sbezverk looking moment | 04:30 |
| sdake | sbezverk good point - how do I do that precisely? | 04:31 |
| sdake | so we can verify a conditona lwill actually work since we don't have cross-repo gating enabled | 04:32 |
| sbezverk | pushd kolla-ansible; | 04:32 |
| sbezverk | run yout command | 04:32 |
| sbezverk | popd | 04:32 |
| openstackgerrit | Steven Dake proposed openstack/kolla-kubernetes master: Comment out placement API in all gate jobs https://review.openstack.org/432721 | 04:33 |
| sdake | sbezverk can you file a blueprint to implement the placement api please | 04:34 |
| sdake | we will need it for the 4.0.0 images once they are on hub | 04:34 |
| sdake | otherwise nova no worky for pike at all | 04:35 |
| sbezverk | sdake: in the patch there are a couple of whitespaces, I hope it will not break the patch application.. | 04:35 |
| sdake | according to how Jeffrey4l_ explained it | 04:35 |
| sdake | sbezverk if it does i can edit it | 04:35 |
| * sdake dispises whitespace behavior of git | 04:35 | |
| sbezverk | sdake: never heard about placement before :) until we hit this issue | 04:35 |
| sdake | sbezverk me either | 04:36 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ do you knwo why teh merge commit is empty in git - yet includes the actual patch? | 04:36 |
| sdake | git show on the merge commit (where sbezverk bisected to) turns up nothing | 04:36 |
| sdake | git show of the actual placement api patch shows the real problem | 04:36 |
| *** crushil has quit IRC | 04:39 | |
| sbezverk | sdake: yeah it looks like it is show stopper for Ocata | 04:39 |
| sdake | fortunately easy to fix | 04:39 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | sdake, no idea. | 04:40 |
| *** newmember has joined #openstack-kolla | 04:44 | |
| sbezverk | sdake: try to add $WORKSPACE before tools/ | 04:45 |
| openstackgerrit | Steven Dake proposed openstack/kolla-kubernetes master: Comment out placement API in all gate jobs https://review.openstack.org/432721 | 04:45 |
| openstackgerrit | Steven Dake proposed openstack/kolla-kubernetes master: Comment out placement API in all gate jobs https://review.openstack.org/432721 | 04:46 |
| sbezverk | sdake: with pushd/popd pwd does not show correct location in the file system if I rememeber right | 04:47 |
| sdake | i see - so why am I pushding kolla-ansible again? | 04:47 |
| sdake | shouldn't I pushd kolla-kubernetes? | 04:47 |
| sbezverk | so even if it show wrong location, it might still work ;) | 04:47 |
| sdake | the patch is in kolla-kubernetes/tools dir | 04:48 |
| openstackgerrit | Steven Dake proposed openstack/kolla-kubernetes master: Comment out placement API in all gate jobs https://review.openstack.org/432721 | 04:49 |
| sdake | where is kolla-kubernetes repo in teh gate, $WORKSPACE? | 04:49 |
| sdake | who is on second :) | 04:50 |
| sbezverk | sdake: it is not there yet | 04:50 |
| sdake | sbezverk please file a bug for this problem against kolla-ansible deliverable in launchpad and link in channel | 04:50 |
| sbezverk | that is why you do not see it, I think it gets cloned later | 04:50 |
| *** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-kolla | 04:50 | |
| *** crushil has joined #openstack-kolla | 04:53 | |
| *** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 04:53 | |
| sdake | zuul jobs on ipv6 = annoying | 04:53 |
| sdake | since my network at home doesn't roll with ipv6 | 04:53 |
| sbezverk | sdake: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla-ansible/+bug/1663961 | 04:54 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1663961 in kolla-ansible "nova compute fails when placement is configured" [Undecided,New] | 04:54 |
| sdake | bbin10 mins | 04:57 |
| sdake | while the gate does it thing | 04:57 |
| sbezverk | sdake: btw, compute kit ps is all ready and green | 05:13 |
| sbezverk | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/431156/ | 05:14 |
| *** caowei has joined #openstack-kolla | 05:16 | |
| sdake | sbezverk cool | 05:21 |
| sdake | are you done with the gate refactor? | 05:21 |
| sdake | i have a seminar on wednesday at 2pm MST | 05:21 |
| sbezverk | that is the last ps for refactor | 05:21 |
| sdake | and I need a working environment that I can demonstrate or record a video of | 05:21 |
| sdake | for both kolla-ansible and kolla-kubernetes | 05:21 |
| *** sacharya has joined #openstack-kolla | 05:22 | |
| sdake | sbezverk can we put a pause on gate refacotrs for a week so the dev env can merge | 05:23 |
| sdake | sbezverk making the gate look perfect is secondary to having a working development environment | 05:23 |
| sdake | bmace 's patch is in merge conflict and in need of a rebase | 05:24 |
| *** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-kolla | 05:24 | |
| sbezverk | this last one does not change previous 2 PS | 05:24 |
| sbezverk | I just add compute kit and experiemntal job to tests it | 05:25 |
| sbezverk | I do not think it is right to wait for wip when there is one ready to get merged | 05:25 |
| sbezverk | sdake: so you fix helped | 05:26 |
| sbezverk | s/you/your/ | 05:26 |
| sdake | wait for wip regardig what? | 05:27 |
| sbezverk | bmace's PS is still in wip | 05:27 |
| sdake | ya - he is waiting for me to test it | 05:27 |
| sdake | and i can't do that because it is in merge conflict | 05:27 |
| sdake | its not wip | 05:28 |
| sdake | its ready to merge if it weren't in merge conflict | 05:28 |
| *** salv-orlando has quit IRC | 05:28 | |
| sbezverk | more reason to finish completely with the gate and then move on | 05:28 |
| sdake | if by finish with the gate - you mean finish today - then yes | 05:29 |
| sdake | if you mean finish next week then no | 05:29 |
| sdake | the dev env is criitical - it has been blocking a whole slew of people for months! | 05:29 |
| sdake | i don't know how many times i have to repeat myself on this point... | 05:29 |
| sbezverk | sdake: it can be finished today if you find second code to ack it ;) | 05:31 |
| sdake | zuul says that patch fixed it | 05:31 |
| sdake | sbezverk link plz - i'll review | 05:31 |
| sbezverk | sdake: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/431156/ | 05:31 |
| sdake | we need to make the gate a little more reliable | 05:32 |
| sdake | all of the rechecks are disturbing :( | 05:32 |
| *** sudipto has quit IRC | 05:34 | |
| *** sudipto_ has quit IRC | 05:34 | |
| *** sudipto has joined #openstack-kolla | 05:34 | |
| *** sudipto_ has joined #openstack-kolla | 05:34 | |
| sbezverk | sdake: I am looking into fixing one frequent failure cause, but still in research mode | 05:34 |
| *** zhangqiankun has quit IRC | 05:36 | |
| *** zhangqiankun has joined #openstack-kolla | 05:37 | |
| sdake | sbezverk https://review.openstack.org/#/c/431156/24 m0ar whitespace problems and a question results in -1 | 05:37 |
| sdake | sbezverk turn it around and i'll +2 it tonight | 05:38 |
| sdake | what frequent cause out of curiosity? | 05:38 |
| sdake | sbezverk there is an etherpad where the gate work is tracked correct? Mind linking? | 05:40 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ this seems to work for kolla-kubernetes - mind having a look: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/432721/6 | 05:40 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ remember -3 images are newton | 05:41 |
| openstackgerrit | Serguei Bezverkhi proposed openstack/kolla-kubernetes master: Adding compute kit based on iscsi backend https://review.openstack.org/431156 | 05:41 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ and sbezverk is going to file a blueprint for api-placement in kolla-kubernetes and link it :) | 05:41 |
| sbezverk | sdake: blue prit is already done | 05:42 |
| sdake | sbezverk cool can you link so i can target it | 05:42 |
| sdake | sbezverk btw this looks good: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/431156/24..25 | 05:42 |
| sbezverk | sdake: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/kolla-kubernetes/+spec/kolla-kubernetes-placement | 05:43 |
| sbezverk | sdake: our gate fails often on generating resolv.conf workaround | 05:43 |
| sbezverk | I am looking into a way to make it less painful | 05:44 |
| sdake | sbezverk is this necessary? https://blueprints.launchpad.net/kolla-kubernetes/+spec/health-checks | 05:47 |
| sbezverk | sdake: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kolla-kubernetes-gate-failure-tracking | 05:47 |
| *** sp__ has quit IRC | 05:47 | |
| sbezverk | sdake: no it is not needed | 05:48 |
| sbezverk | ok I am off for now, good night.. | 05:51 |
| sdake | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/kolla-kubernetes/+spec/gate-continous-improvement | 05:51 |
| sdake | thanks sbezverk | 05:51 |
| sdake | have a nice evening | 05:51 |
| *** unicell has joined #openstack-kolla | 05:57 | |
| *** FiveBroDeepBook has joined #openstack-kolla | 06:00 | |
| *** FiveBroDeepBook has left #openstack-kolla | 06:03 | |
| *** unicell has quit IRC | 06:07 | |
| *** unicell has joined #openstack-kolla | 06:07 | |
| bmace | sdake: my change can't merge until kubernetes python lib is supported in global requirements | 06:17 |
| sdake | bmace ok - can you rebase anyway - so I can actually test it out - I have sunday allocated to producing a working demo of it for a seminar on wednesday | 06:18 |
| bmace | looks like the only issue is with the keystone rc change | 06:19 |
| bmace | sdake: also.. looking at review.openstack.org it doesn't show as in conflict, until the iscsi backend changes from sbezverk get merged in | 06:20 |
| sdake | bmace wierd gerrit showed it as -1 - let me check it moment | 06:20 |
| bmace | sdake: -1 from me and -1 from jenkins due to requirements failure | 06:21 |
| sdake | oh requirements | 06:21 |
| sdake | right | 06:21 |
| bmace | sdake: so, have at it and let me know how it goes :) | 06:21 |
| sdake | i see it is failing the gate | 06:21 |
| sdake | i will have at it -although its midnight here and i am out of steam | 06:21 |
| bmace | sdake: from what i have seen some of those fail semi-randomly.. if we really have an issue with pv / pvc allocation i'm not surprised.. which seems why the devenv doesn't come up clean sometimes also | 06:22 |
| sdake | ok - recheck gets the semi-random failures to a green state eventually | 06:22 |
| bmace | sdake: i hate inconsistent failures... the worst kind :/ | 06:23 |
| sdake | agreed | 06:23 |
| sdake | we have a blueprint to fix that | 06:23 |
| sdake | bmace https://blueprints.launchpad.net/kolla-kubernetes/+spec/gate-continous-improvement | 06:24 |
| *** huzhengchuan has quit IRC | 06:30 | |
| *** huzhengchuan has joined #openstack-kolla | 06:30 | |
| openstackgerrit | Steven Dake proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Fixes problem with kolla-kubernetes 3.0.2 images https://review.openstack.org/432725 | 06:32 |
| openstackgerrit | Steven Dake proposed openstack/kolla-kubernetes master: Test a critical kolla-ansible defect resolution https://review.openstack.org/432721 | 06:39 |
| *** crushil has quit IRC | 06:50 | |
| *** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-kolla | 07:03 | |
| *** sacharya has quit IRC | 07:08 | |
| *** sacharya has joined #openstack-kolla | 07:09 | |
| *** ssurana has quit IRC | 07:14 | |
| *** sacharya has quit IRC | 07:14 | |
| *** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-kolla | 07:25 | |
| *** salv-orlando has quit IRC | 07:29 | |
| *** crushil has joined #openstack-kolla | 07:37 | |
| *** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 07:39 | |
| *** unicell has quit IRC | 07:43 | |
| *** unicell has joined #openstack-kolla | 07:43 | |
| *** ipsecguy has quit IRC | 07:49 | |
| *** unicell1 has joined #openstack-kolla | 07:50 | |
| *** sdake has quit IRC | 07:56 | |
| *** unicell1 has quit IRC | 08:01 | |
| *** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-kolla | 08:01 | |
| *** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 08:04 | |
| *** crushil has quit IRC | 08:23 | |
| openstackgerrit | Jeffrey Zhang proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Fix horizon pull error https://review.openstack.org/432738 | 08:46 |
| openstackgerrit | Jeffrey Zhang proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Fix horizon pull error https://review.openstack.org/432738 | 09:16 |
| openstackgerrit | Jeffrey Zhang proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Install ansible without upper constraints https://review.openstack.org/432739 | 09:16 |
| *** kong has joined #openstack-kolla | 09:17 | |
| *** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-kolla | 09:26 | |
| *** salv-orlando has quit IRC | 09:30 | |
| openstackgerrit | Jeffrey Zhang proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Install ansible without upper constraints https://review.openstack.org/432739 | 09:34 |
| openstackgerrit | Jeffrey Zhang proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Fix horizon pull error https://review.openstack.org/432738 | 09:34 |
| *** hrw has quit IRC | 09:41 | |
| *** hrw has joined #openstack-kolla | 09:43 | |
| *** mannamne has joined #openstack-kolla | 10:19 | |
| *** ipsecguy has joined #openstack-kolla | 10:23 | |
| openstackgerrit | Jeffrey Zhang proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Install ansible without upper constraints https://review.openstack.org/432739 | 10:33 |
| openstackgerrit | Jeffrey Zhang proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Fix horizon pull error https://review.openstack.org/432738 | 10:33 |
| *** gema has quit IRC | 11:03 | |
| *** gema has joined #openstack-kolla | 11:03 | |
| *** huzhengchuan has quit IRC | 11:07 | |
| *** kelv has quit IRC | 11:36 | |
| *** sp__ has joined #openstack-kolla | 11:48 | |
| *** sp__ has quit IRC | 11:58 | |
| *** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-kolla | 12:03 | |
| *** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 12:05 | |
| *** pbourke has quit IRC | 12:08 | |
| *** pbourke has joined #openstack-kolla | 12:08 | |
| *** FiveBroDeepBook has joined #openstack-kolla | 12:09 | |
| *** FiveBroDeepBook has left #openstack-kolla | 12:09 | |
| *** caowei has quit IRC | 12:27 | |
| *** kong has quit IRC | 12:29 | |
| *** caowei has joined #openstack-kolla | 12:33 | |
| *** sp__ has joined #openstack-kolla | 12:50 | |
| *** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-kolla | 13:06 | |
| *** sudipto_ has quit IRC | 13:09 | |
| *** sudipto has quit IRC | 13:09 | |
| financeMan | How do I deploy kolla from a stable branch? I am not seeing it in the documentation -> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/kolla/newton/quickstart.html | 13:09 |
| *** salv-orlando has quit IRC | 13:10 | |
| *** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-kolla | 13:16 | |
| *** zhubingbing has joined #openstack-kolla | 13:17 | |
| *** salv-orlando has quit IRC | 13:22 | |
| *** haplo37 has quit IRC | 13:23 | |
| *** haplo37 has joined #openstack-kolla | 13:31 | |
| *** financeMan has quit IRC | 13:49 | |
| *** sdake has joined #openstack-kolla | 13:50 | |
| *** Pavo has joined #openstack-kolla | 13:54 | |
| *** ipsecguy has quit IRC | 13:54 | |
| *** ipsecguy has joined #openstack-kolla | 13:54 | |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ morning - around? | 13:55 |
| sdake | any cores around - seeing this problem in the gate: http://logs.openstack.org/25/432725/1/check/gate-kolla-ansible-dsvm-deploy-centos-binary-centos-7-nv/09f74b7/console.html | 13:56 |
| sdake | jinja2.8 should be in the pip archive - is this an infra problem or a gate regressoin? | 13:57 |
| *** breitz has quit IRC | 13:59 | |
| Jeffrey4l_ | sdake, yep. | 14:08 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | i have a patch fixing this. | 14:08 |
| sdake | link pls so I can ack | 14:09 |
| sdake | blocking my demo wednesday - and running out of time | 14:09 |
| sdake | i know that isn't your problem or a community problem | 14:09 |
| sdake | however i am representing the community here a tthis meetup, and and i can't get a demo of kolla-ansible and kolla-kubernetes rolling in time, our community will look kind of flakey :( | 14:09 |
| sdake | i had believed the code base was in good shape and ready to roll for a demo | 14:10 |
| sdake | appears we aren't quite there yet- so will have to cobble together something usable | 14:10 |
| openstackgerrit | Jeffrey Zhang proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Install ansible without upper constraints https://review.openstack.org/432739 | 14:10 |
| sdake | I may do a demo of stable branches of kolla-ansible | 14:10 |
| *** eaguilar has joined #openstack-kolla | 14:10 | |
| Jeffrey4l_ | sdake, https://review.openstack.org/432739 | 14:10 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ may I ask - is this because of a requirements.txt change ? | 14:11 |
| openstackgerrit | Jeffrey Zhang proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Fix horizon pull error https://review.openstack.org/432738 | 14:11 |
| sdake | I saw on the [ptl] tag that requirements would be unfrozen | 14:11 |
| sdake | so we will have to deal with that problem as a trailing release cycle project by -2'ing all requirements changes until the last minute and doing a manual sync | 14:11 |
| sdake | why are upper constraints for jinja2 -=2.9.5 | 14:12 |
| sdake | ==2.9.5? | 14:12 |
| sdake | constraints project shouldn't hard pin omo | 14:12 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | sdake, requirements creates ocata branch. | 14:12 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | so constraints is changed. | 14:12 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | i have say we should create ocata branch now. | 14:13 |
| sdake | yup makes sense | 14:13 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | have to say. | 14:13 |
| sdake | that will sovle the problem with the requirements sync | 14:13 |
| sdake | however create a backport problem | 14:13 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | yep. | 14:13 |
| sdake | although I feel those problems are solveable given the experiences we had with newton | 14:13 |
| sdake | as long as new fetaures aren't going in | 14:13 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | no perfect solution ;) | 14:13 |
| sdake | this is why i sugggested no new features after 4.0.0.b3 when you asked | 14:14 |
| sdake | are new features going into ocata? | 14:14 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | almost all projects creates ocata branch. | 14:14 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | i think it is really time to do so in kolla. | 14:14 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | new. | 14:14 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ ok - well you are the release laison - you have ultimate authority over when that is done | 14:14 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | no. | 14:14 |
| sdake | no you don't? | 14:15 |
| sdake | or no new features | 14:15 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | no new features. | 14:15 |
| sdake | cool - so just bug fixes | 14:15 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | yep. | 14:15 |
| sdake | we should be backporting those as best we can | 14:15 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | sure. | 14:15 |
| sdake | so to branch you need a tag first | 14:15 |
| sdake | to branch from the tag | 14:15 |
| sdake | i think is how it works ;-) | 14:15 |
| sdake | which means rc1 should be tagged with current state of a (working) master | 14:16 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | yep. i will create rc1 tag at the same time create ocata branch. | 14:16 |
| sdake | nice | 14:16 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ all this stuff is harder then it looks huh :) | 14:16 |
| sdake | managing the release process, managing backports, managing features, etc | 14:16 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | sdake, after this https://review.openstack.org/432738 is merged. i will start the branching. | 14:17 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | yep. it is. | 14:17 |
| sdake | if we can get my patch in for genconfig i'd appreciate that too | 14:17 |
| sdake | if not, i can backport it | 14:17 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | no problem. | 14:17 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | is there a patch? | 14:17 |
| sdake | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/432738/5/ansible/roles/horizon/tasks/pull.yml | 14:17 |
| sdake | with dict does what? | 14:17 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | got it. | 14:18 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | with_items works with list, with_dict works with dict. | 14:18 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | with_dict just like items() | 14:18 |
| sdake | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/432725/ | 14:18 |
| sdake | where is the dictionariy in that patch? | 14:19 |
| sdake | (just tryign to learn not suggesting yoru patch is wrong) | 14:19 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | would u mind to add some NOTE to your patch? which is helpful to be removed in the feature. because this is a dirty workaround atm. | 14:19 |
| sdake | where is horizon_services defined? | 14:19 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ leave review comments and I'll fix as necessary | 14:19 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | cool | 14:20 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ i a mwaiting on a functional gate, so we need your patch merged | 14:20 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | sdake, re horizon_services not suggesting yoru patch is wrong) | 14:20 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | https://github.com/openstack/kolla-ansible/blob/master/ansible/roles/horizon/defaults/main.yml#L4 | 14:20 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | roger. | 14:20 |
| sdake | cool thanks for teaching me that Jeffrey4l_ :) | 14:20 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | np ;) | 14:20 |
| openstackgerrit | Jeffrey Zhang proposed openstack/kolla master: [TEST][MASTER][KOLLA] https://review.openstack.org/426625 | 14:21 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ if you can lave coments in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/432725/1/ansible/roles/nova/templates/nova.conf.j2 now - i'll address them as I have a slew of prep work to do for this seminar | 14:22 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ please read my latest comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/432721/7 | 14:24 |
| sdake | oh nm, that was sbezverk that made that statement | 14:25 |
| *** sdake has quit IRC | 14:26 | |
| *** Pavo has quit IRC | 14:27 | |
| Jeffrey4l_ | sdake, i left just now. | 14:28 |
| *** ipsecguy_ has joined #openstack-kolla | 14:31 | |
| *** ipsecguy has quit IRC | 14:31 | |
| *** sdake has joined #openstack-kolla | 14:32 | |
| Jeffrey4l_ | sdake, could u ack this one ? https://review.openstack.org/429358 | 14:33 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ looking | 14:34 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | and this one if possible https://review.openstack.org/424504 ;) | 14:34 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ give me a moment - rebasing my patches so we can get rc1 rolling | 14:34 |
| *** mannamne has quit IRC | 14:35 | |
| *** ipsecguy_ has quit IRC | 14:36 | |
| *** ipsecguy has joined #openstack-kolla | 14:36 | |
| Jeffrey4l_ | roger. work for me. | 14:39 |
| openstackgerrit | Serguei Bezverkhi proposed openstack/kolla-kubernetes master: Stabilizing the gate, fixing resolv.conf issue https://review.openstack.org/432764 | 14:43 |
| openstackgerrit | Steven Dake proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Fixes problem with kolla-kubernetes 3.0.2 images https://review.openstack.org/432725 | 14:44 |
| openstackgerrit | Steven Dake proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Install ansible without upper constraints https://review.openstack.org/432739 | 14:44 |
| openstackgerrit | Steven Dake proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Fix horizon pull error https://review.openstack.org/432738 | 14:44 |
| openstackgerrit | Steven Dake proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Fixes problem with kolla-kubernetes 3.0.2 images https://review.openstack.org/432725 | 14:44 |
| openstackgerrit | Steven Dake proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Install ansible without upper constraints https://review.openstack.org/432739 | 14:44 |
| openstackgerrit | Steven Dake proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Fix horizon pull error https://review.openstack.org/432738 | 14:44 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ I don't understand htis statement could you rephrase in irc: hrm. we haven't mark this as deprecated and use config.json instead. | 14:44 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ zomg that last one will take a little bit to process :) | 14:45 |
| *** ipsecguy has quit IRC | 14:46 | |
| *** ipsecguy has joined #openstack-kolla | 14:47 | |
| *** mannamne has joined #openstack-kolla | 14:48 | |
| Jeffrey4l_ | thanks. | 14:50 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ I see a slew of conflicting patches for that optimize patch | 14:50 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ that implies that making reconfigure work well is sitll an outstanding feature | 14:51 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ I think neutron is clearly a priority | 14:51 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ looking at that patch - as I haven't been following the reconfigure work, I don't feel very comfortable adding a +2/+W to it | 14:52 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ although the patch looks good to me, and happy to +1 it | 14:52 |
| sdake | (I don't see any glaring errors) | 14:52 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ given that the kolla-ansible gate doesn't test reconfigure (yet), I'd have to either a) have context for the patch or b) test it personally | 14:53 |
| sdake | I lack A, and don't have time for b given the time pressure of the seminar in 3 days | 14:53 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ any chance you can hunt down a different reviewer for it? | 14:53 |
| sbezverk | good morning, what is new and exciting ;)? | 14:55 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | sdake, yep. we still use extend_start.sh | 14:56 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ right i am aware of that :) | 14:56 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ that last set of messages was for better-reconfigure blueprint | 14:57 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ lets talk about this review: https://review.openstack.org/429358 | 14:57 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | i left some comments. but seem egonzalez missed it. | 14:58 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ i don't understand the comment you left - could you rephrase | 14:59 |
| *** rwallner has joined #openstack-kolla | 14:59 | |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ If I read the review right, an dfrom my understanding of config.json, config.json should be doing the chowns | 15:00 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ maybe that has changed in the last month or so | 15:00 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ did we deprecate config.json doing the chowns? | 15:00 |
| *** rwallner has quit IRC | 15:00 | |
| *** rwallner has joined #openstack-kolla | 15:01 | |
| *** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-kolla | 15:01 | |
| *** david-lyle has joined #openstack-kolla | 15:02 | |
| *** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 15:02 | |
| *** huzhengchuan has joined #openstack-kolla | 15:05 | |
| *** david-lyle has quit IRC | 15:10 | |
| Jeffrey4l_ | sdake, gate tests reconfigre. | 15:10 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | sdake, check https://github.com/openstack/kolla-ansible/blob/master/tools/deploy_aio.sh#L112 | 15:10 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | ok. i will. | 15:11 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | thanks. | 15:11 |
| openstackgerrit | Serguei Bezverkhi proposed openstack/kolla-kubernetes master: Stabilizing the gate, fixing resolv.conf issue https://review.openstack.org/432764 | 15:15 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ cool - re reconfigure I'd be happy to change my vote to +2 then | 15:15 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | sdake, do u get what egonzalez said? | 15:18 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | now, for log folder, we have two solutions. one is in extend_start.sh ( what that patch does). another is config.json, which is a workaround for uid and gid change. | 15:18 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | right? | 15:18 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | we never deprecated either one. | 15:18 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | on the other hand i think the former one is better, since we have multi deliverables now. | 15:18 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | sdake, we didn't deprecated either extend_start or config.json. | 15:18 |
| *** l4yerffeJ has joined #openstack-kolla | 15:18 | |
| *** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-kolla | 15:18 | |
| *** salv-orlando has quit IRC | 15:23 | |
| *** huzhengchuan has quit IRC | 15:23 | |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ got it | 15:24 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l_ let me hunt down the review again | 15:24 |
| Jeffrey4l_ | thanks. | 15:28 |
| *** Jeffrey4l_ has quit IRC | 15:30 | |
| *** Jeffrey4l__ has joined #openstack-kolla | 15:30 | |
| Jeffrey4l__ | sdake, gate is green again. https://review.openstack.org/432739 | 15:31 |
| openstackgerrit | zhubingbing proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Fix keystone revocation error https://review.openstack.org/432768 | 15:31 |
| *** breitz has joined #openstack-kolla | 15:31 | |
| *** Jeffrey4l__ has quit IRC | 15:32 | |
| *** Jeffrey4l__ has joined #openstack-kolla | 15:33 | |
| *** Jeffrey4l__ is now known as Jeffrey4l | 15:33 | |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l check out https://review.openstack.org/#/c/429358/1 | 15:34 |
| Jeffrey4l | thanks. | 15:35 |
| sdake | zhubingbing where is the workflow dude? :) | 15:35 |
| sdake | zhubingbing on https://review.openstack.org/432739 | 15:36 |
| zhubingbing | yes | 15:36 |
| zhubingbing | wait gate | 15:36 |
| *** leseb has quit IRC | 15:36 | |
| sdake | gate is green isn't it? | 15:36 |
| sdake | ok - wfm :) | 15:36 |
| Jeffrey4l | he -w before the gate. | 15:36 |
| sdake | ya i rebased those patches | 15:37 |
| zhubingbing | ;) | 15:37 |
| sdake | so I could stack mine on top | 15:37 |
| sdake | and forgot that needs a new gat erun | 15:37 |
| sdake | 8am here ;) | 15:37 |
| zhubingbing | done | 15:37 |
| zhubingbing | ;) | 15:37 |
| sdake | can folks have a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/432725/3 | 15:38 |
| sdake | then I htink we can branch | 15:38 |
| sdake | note i tested this patch in the gate (see very first comment) of kolla-kubernetes and the gate is gloriously green | 15:39 |
| openstackgerrit | Serguei Bezverkhi proposed openstack/kolla-kubernetes master: Stabilizing the gate, fixing resolv.conf issue https://review.openstack.org/432764 | 15:39 |
| Jeffrey4l | +2ed | 15:39 |
| openstackgerrit | Jeffrey Zhang proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Optimize reconfigure action for neutron https://review.openstack.org/424504 | 15:39 |
| sdake | sbezverk shortly genconfg problem will be gtg - nice job sorting out the patch and the need for the placement api | 15:40 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible master: Install ansible without upper constraints https://review.openstack.org/432739 | 15:40 |
| *** rwallner has quit IRC | 15:40 | |
| Jeffrey4l | gare is green too. please ack https://review.openstack.org/432738 | 15:41 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l why did you rebase 424504 | 15:41 |
| Jeffrey4l | sdake, run the gate again ;) | 15:42 |
| sdake | recheck? | 15:42 |
| sdake | recheck runs the gate again against the latest master | 15:42 |
| Jeffrey4l | recheck do not rebase to the latest code. | 15:42 |
| sdake | i have had this conversatio nabout 20 times with core reviewers and everyone argues with me | 15:42 |
| sdake | yet i proved it to sbezverk and kfox a few weeks ago | 15:42 |
| sdake | so they finally stopped arguing | 15:42 |
| Jeffrey4l | ok. | 15:42 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l fwiw i originally thought the same as you did | 15:43 |
| sdake | however, openstack-infra corrected me on the mailing list | 15:43 |
| Jeffrey4l | but how the magic happened? | 15:43 |
| sdake | sam and I both verified their statements | 15:43 |
| Jeffrey4l | on the other hand, recheck and rebase is almost the same ;) | 15:43 |
| sdake | rebase is slightly different wrt how stackalytics processses content | 15:44 |
| sdake | i'd far prefer rechecks to rebases, and i think all contributors would agree | 15:44 |
| openstackgerrit | Jeffrey Zhang proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [TEST] test recheck https://review.openstack.org/432769 | 15:50 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l here is the thread: https://openstack.nimeyo.com/75611/openstack-dev-kolla-unblocking-the-gate | 15:51 |
| openstackgerrit | zhubingbing proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Fix keystone revocation error https://review.openstack.org/432768 | 15:51 |
| *** zigo has quit IRC | 15:51 | |
| Jeffrey4l | roger. thanks. | 15:52 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l recommend reading throug hthat to understand the how it works part :) | 15:52 |
| sdake | there is a good description in the thread after I made the mistaken request | 15:52 |
| *** zigo has joined #openstack-kolla | 15:55 | |
| openstackgerrit | Jeffrey Zhang proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: [TEST] test recheck https://review.openstack.org/432769 | 15:56 |
| sdake | zhubingbing can you ack https://review.openstack.org/#/c/432725/ pls | 16:00 |
| zhubingbing | ok | 16:00 |
| Jeffrey4l | sdake, verified. recheck works as expect. thanks. | 16:01 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l cool :) | 16:01 |
| zhubingbing | i need test it | 16:01 |
| zhubingbing | LGFM | 16:02 |
| sdake | Jeffrey4l your test approach is pretty cool :) | 16:02 |
| sdake | much smipler then mine was | 16:02 |
| sdake | git log - didn't think of that | 16:02 |
| Jeffrey4l | :) | 16:03 |
| Jeffrey4l | zuul-cloner always rebase the patch on the master the project code. | 16:03 |
| *** goldyfruit has joined #openstack-kolla | 16:03 | |
| sdake | right | 16:03 |
| Jeffrey4l | so the commit log/hash changed. | 16:03 |
| zhubingbing | sdake ；） next week i have began start kolla-k8s | 16:04 |
| sdake | zhubingbing hotness | 16:04 |
| sdake | zhubingbing how do you feel about implementing ironic :) | 16:04 |
| sdake | zhubingbing the dev env is about ready to merge | 16:04 |
| zhubingbing | ironic？ i like cobbler | 16:04 |
| zhubingbing | i dont‘t like it | 16:04 |
| sdake | zhubingbing i see - fair enough - how about magnum then? | 16:05 |
| sdake | zhubingbing if you can't do any implementation work - reviews are also helpful :) | 16:06 |
| zhubingbing | roger | 16:07 |
| sdake | roger on magnum or roger on reviews | 16:07 |
| zhubingbing | for reviews | 16:08 |
| sdake | thanks :) | 16:08 |
| zhubingbing | magnum i think it | 16:08 |
| zhubingbing | it is too complicated for a container solution | 16:09 |
| sdake | tend to agree | 16:09 |
| zhubingbing | But recently I did not continue study this project | 16:09 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/kolla master: Fix panko log folder owner https://review.openstack.org/429358 | 16:12 |
| openstackgerrit | Marcin Juszkiewicz proposed openstack/kolla master: build: sort list of built/failed images before printing https://review.openstack.org/432774 | 16:16 |
| sbezverk | sdake: please check this one, it will eliminate one common types of failure at the kube gate. https://review.openstack.org/432764 | 16:17 |
| hrw | can someone look at https://review.openstack.org/432774 and tell does it make sense for you? | 16:17 |
| sdake | hrw note i responded on the ml re your review | 16:17 |
| sdake | hrw did you happen to read it yet this fine sunday morning? | 16:18 |
| hrw | sdake: thx, not checked mails yet | 16:18 |
| sdake | please read that email | 16:18 |
| sdake | rathe rthat mailing list message | 16:18 |
| hrw | sdake: thanks | 16:18 |
| hrw | sdake: makes sense. | 16:19 |
| sdake | hrw cool - so we arn't ignoring you - we are overloaded :) | 16:20 |
| hrw | sdake: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/kolla/+spec/multiarch-and-arm64-containers is my BP - have to link it somehow to review/branch | 16:20 |
| hrw | also have to update that bp a bit | 16:20 |
| sdake | hrw the place to udpat eis the work items field | 16:21 |
| hrw | yep, doing that now. | 16:21 |
| hrw | long time since I played with LP | 16:21 |
| sdake | hrw ya launchpad is not ideal - its what we have :( | 16:22 |
| hrw | ;) | 16:22 |
| hrw | sdake: Linaro moved to JIRA | 16:22 |
| sdake | hrw opentack is moving to a free tool called storyboard | 16:22 |
| sdake | jira costs way too much for the 3000 individuals contributing to a release | 16:22 |
| sdake | (in terms of commits/bug triage/etc) | 16:23 |
| hrw | sdake: I have no idea is it free or not - that's what I have to work with | 16:23 |
| *** mattmceuen has quit IRC | 16:23 | |
| hrw | sdake: So, while waiting for Ocata release, I will do some tweaks here and there and send them for review. Then will wait patiently for someone to review them. | 16:24 |
| sdake | hrw right - i'd expect more action around march 10th when we cut ocata iirc | 16:25 |
| hrw | fine for me | 16:25 |
| hrw | sdake: from 21th Feb to end of week I am on PTO, then week of work, then conference week | 16:26 |
| sdake | cool - i know it sucks being right in the midst of a release rc1 and trying to get work done for pike | 16:26 |
| *** adrian_otto has joined #openstack-kolla | 16:27 | |
| hrw | sdake: BP updated | 16:27 |
| hrw | sdake: Kolla uses packages so for some time it will still build Ocata, right? | 16:28 |
| *** FiveBroDeepBook has joined #openstack-kolla | 16:28 | |
| *** FiveBroDeepBook has left #openstack-kolla | 16:28 | |
| sdake | hrw i have provided a partial review of the review you linked earlier | 16:29 |
| hrw | sdake: sorting is not related to any BP | 16:30 |
| hrw | it is just a small usability tweak | 16:30 |
| hrw | added note | 16:31 |
| sdake | hrw - i see - well i thought that was related to multiarch | 16:31 |
| hrw | sdake: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/430940 ones is | 16:31 |
| hrw | will add link there | 16:31 |
| sdake | hrw that is how you do the linkage, you can apply it to your other review :) | 16:31 |
| sdake | sounds good | 16:31 |
| hrw | I have V7 of 430940 to send - just not enough changes to make an update | 16:32 |
| sdake | hrw you can always update the commit message without having other changes attached | 16:34 |
| sdake | git rebase -i | 16:34 |
| sdake | use the reword keyword on the patch in question | 16:35 |
| sdake | git review | 16:35 |
| hrw | sdake: is there a way to mark image as not-buildable? so "kolla failingimage" would end immediately without doing failed build? | 16:35 |
| hrw | sdake: I use 'git commit --amend' - effect same | 16:35 |
| hrw | branch has only this one patch ;d | 16:35 |
| *** mannamne has quit IRC | 16:35 | |
| sdake | hrw yup that will work too :) | 16:36 |
| hrw | and yes, git rebase is better than it was years ago | 16:36 |
| hrw | sdake: is your -1 on sorting patch related to lack of link to BP or to code? if first then please drop it | 16:41 |
| sdake | hrw lack of link to bp - use the reply button in the review to tell me i'm wrong and click post | 16:41 |
| hrw | ok | 16:41 |
| hrw | sdake: I wrote ~that in my reply | 16:41 |
| Jeffrey4l | sdake, could u ack https://review.openstack.org/432738 | 16:42 |
| sdake | hrw click this link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/432774/1//COMMIT_MSG | 16:43 |
| hrw | done. hope that properly. gerrit is not my strongest part | 16:44 |
| *** sdake has quit IRC | 16:50 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible master: Fix horizon pull error https://review.openstack.org/432738 | 16:51 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/kolla-ansible master: Fixes problem with kolla-kubernetes 3.0.2 images https://review.openstack.org/432725 | 16:51 |
| *** adrian_otto has quit IRC | 16:52 | |
| *** zhubingbing has quit IRC | 16:56 | |
| *** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-kolla | 16:58 | |
| sbezverk | Jeffrey4l: Do you have more info about placement? and if its binaries are already in one of kolla's images | 17:00 |
| Jeffrey4l | sbezverk, yep. check https://github.com/openstack/kolla/blob/master/docker/nova/nova-placement-api/Dockerfile.j2 | 17:00 |
| Jeffrey4l | it is part of nova now. and will be split into a stand alone project in the future. sbezverk | 17:01 |
| *** mgoddard has joined #openstack-kolla | 17:01 | |
| sbezverk | Jeffrey4l: thanks, what about resources it uses, like ports etc | 17:01 |
| Jeffrey4l | it use 8780. | 17:02 |
| Jeffrey4l | and require registering a new endpoint. | 17:03 |
| Jeffrey4l | sbezverk, check https://github.com/openstack-dev/devstack/blob/master/lib/placement | 17:03 |
| sbezverk | Jeffrey4l: what about db? | 17:07 |
| sbezverk | does it use different db, or nova-api? | 17:07 |
| Jeffrey4l | sbezverk, now it share the nova_api database. | 17:07 |
| Jeffrey4l | it will own its own data in the future. | 17:07 |
| Jeffrey4l | i saw one nova bp for this. | 17:08 |
| sbezverk | Jeffrey4l: cool, so we just need to bootstrap endpoints and create a service for it | 17:08 |
| Jeffrey4l | yep. | 17:08 |
| sbezverk | Jeffrey4l: thanks.. | 17:09 |
| Jeffrey4l | np. | 17:09 |
| Jeffrey4l | gonna to bed. bye. | 17:09 |
| hrw | bye Jeffrey4l | 17:09 |
| *** rdotcom has joined #openstack-kolla | 17:15 | |
| *** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-kolla | 17:19 | |
| *** jrich523 has quit IRC | 17:24 | |
| *** salv-orlando has quit IRC | 17:24 | |
| *** leseb has joined #openstack-kolla | 17:29 | |
| openstackgerrit | Marcin Juszkiewicz proposed openstack/kolla master: debian: import key for download.ceph.com repository https://review.openstack.org/432778 | 17:31 |
| *** vcn[m] has quit IRC | 17:34 | |
| *** bachp has quit IRC | 17:36 | |
| *** retr0h has quit IRC | 17:36 | |
| openstackgerrit | Marcin Juszkiewicz proposed openstack/kolla master: keystone-base: enable Debian support https://review.openstack.org/432779 | 17:37 |
| hrw | hm. debian/jessie is complicated stuff when jessie-backports is used as a tag | 17:43 |
| *** sdake has joined #openstack-kolla | 17:53 | |
| sdake | hrw after clicking that link click my review - and click reply | 17:53 |
| openstackgerrit | Marcin Juszkiewicz proposed openstack/kolla master: debian: default to jessie-backports if it is used as base_tag https://review.openstack.org/432780 | 17:54 |
| sdake | hrw and type in what yo uthink is appropriate | 17:56 |
| hrw | sdake: done | 17:56 |
| sdake | hrw now type post to the review | 17:56 |
| sdake | you can use the up arrow to get back to the oriignal review | 17:56 |
| *** eaguilar has quit IRC | 17:57 | |
| sdake | the green one in gerrit | 17:57 |
| openstackgerrit | Marcin Juszkiewicz proposed openstack/kolla master: keystone-base: enable Debian support https://review.openstack.org/432779 | 17:57 |
| *** eaguilar_ has joined #openstack-kolla | 17:57 | |
| sdake | hrw i se you figured it out :) | 17:57 |
| sdake | nice job :) | 17:57 |
| openstackgerrit | Serguei Bezverkhi proposed openstack/kolla-kubernetes master: DO NOT MERGE: Hunting for canal plugin failure https://review.openstack.org/432781 | 18:00 |
| hrw | sdake: I will do some work on x86-64 to get Debian stuff enabled and then check on aarch64;D | 18:00 |
| sdake | sound sgood | 18:00 |
| sdake | I think enabling x86_64 for debian will be easier as my understanding is the package names are different from ubuntu | 18:01 |
| sdake | and aarch64 has no gating mechanism in infra | 18:01 |
| sdake | so sounds like a good place to start | 18:01 |
| hrw | sdake: it is cleanly visible that no one built Debian target for a while | 18:01 |
| sdake | hrw for awhile/ever | 18:01 |
| sdake | it was almsot deprecated this cycle | 18:01 |
| sdake | you came just at the right time | 18:01 |
| hrw | ;) | 18:02 |
| sdake | our general rule of thumb is if someone maintains it, it can stay in tree | 18:02 |
| sdake | if nobody maintains it we deprecate it | 18:02 |
| *** rwallner has joined #openstack-kolla | 18:03 | |
| sdake | then there ia a deprecation policy that applies to openstack which we follow | 18:03 |
| *** flaper87 has quit IRC | 18:05 | |
| *** rwallner has quit IRC | 18:08 | |
| *** flaper87 has joined #openstack-kolla | 18:11 | |
| *** sp__ has quit IRC | 18:12 | |
| *** goldyfruit has quit IRC | 18:14 | |
| hrw | 143 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 176 deletions(-) | 18:27 |
| hrw | enabling debian in docker/ whereever ubuntu is present | 18:27 |
| hrw | sdake: changeset which has +2 (like that sorting one) needs to be then merged by someone with proper permissions, right? so >10 March too probably, right? | 18:33 |
| sdake | hrw it might merge prior to march 10 - depends on the kindness of reviewers | 18:33 |
| hrw | sure | 18:33 |
| sdake | hrw an easy to review patch like that is easy to handle | 18:34 |
| hrw | my laptop will have lot of things to do during night ;D building all images for x86-64/debian ;D | 18:34 |
| hrw | sdake: yep | 18:34 |
| sdake | hrw it takes two +2s to approve a change | 18:34 |
| hrw | ok | 18:34 |
| hrw | good to know | 18:34 |
| sdake | hrw the second person to +2 it applies a workflow +w to the patch | 18:34 |
| sdake | this merges the change into master | 18:35 |
| hrw | ok | 18:35 |
| sdake | anyone can vote +1 on a patch if they like, however, a +1 does not trigger a merge | 18:35 |
| sdake | anyone can also vote -1 on a patch if they like | 18:35 |
| hrw | sure | 18:35 |
| sdake | hrw will you be at the ptg? | 18:36 |
| hrw | sdake: no. make next one in Europe so I will attend | 18:36 |
| sdake | hrw i dont choose where they are located | 18:37 |
| sdake | the openstack foundation determines the location of the ptgs | 18:37 |
| sdake | although I did see a tweet from the foundation that as a result of the immigration chaos in the US, 2018 events will be located outside the US | 18:37 |
| sdake | it was unclera if they were speaking of summit only or also PTGs | 18:38 |
| hrw | sdake: team's travel budget is limited. I already have few trips during year where my manager has to approve. | 18:38 |
| sdake | hrw: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/foundation/2017-January/002465.html | 18:39 |
| sdake | hrw ya everyone has travel budget constraints | 18:39 |
| *** Pavo has joined #openstack-kolla | 18:39 | |
| sdake | hrw there is always the travel support program as well | 18:39 |
| sdake | as kolla is global and mostly not US based, we struggle to gain quorum in any location f2f | 18:40 |
| hrw | sdake: I prefer to leave travel support program to those who are fresh in community, freelancers etc. | 18:41 |
| sdake | hrw sounds good | 18:41 |
| *** mdorman has quit IRC | 18:42 | |
| hrw | sdake: I remember 2007 when my FOSDEM trip was so complicated that one company just bought me flight tickets so I could attend it as whole. | 18:42 |
| sdake | ncie i have never been to fosdem | 18:42 |
| sdake | i don't have a desire to attend though as I'm not super keen on travel | 18:43 |
| hrw | few years later I took one of local friends on similar conditions to FOSDEM. He got travel and hotel covered and only had to take money for food/living. | 18:43 |
| hrw | on second day we gave him also some € for that. | 18:43 |
| *** mgoddard has quit IRC | 18:43 | |
| hrw | he was | 18:44 |
| hrw | he was 'contributing developer' in arch or alpine at that moment and spent most of time with distro developers. lot of f2f meetings etc | 18:44 |
| hrw | from my perspective it was worth spending my money ;D | 18:45 |
| sdake | yup i often help people out in the community with room sharing although I dont prefer it | 18:45 |
| hrw | sdake: fosdem is quite unique. this year it had 645 talks during two days | 18:45 |
| sdake | although my wife travels with me to most events I go to as she has her own set of things to work on in openstack | 18:45 |
| *** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 18:46 | |
| hrw | ;) | 18:46 |
| sdake | another way of putting that is i travel with her as she is platinum airliner :) | 18:46 |
| sdake | this year I may sadly make platinum... | 18:46 |
| * sdake groans | 18:47 | |
| hrw | ;DD | 18:47 |
| sdake | i am gold this year | 18:47 |
| sdake | with only 4 travel events in 2016 | 18:47 |
| sdake | or 3 - i dont recall | 18:47 |
| hrw | In europe I usually travel with cheap airlines | 18:48 |
| sdake | this year I've got about 6-8 weeks of travel | 18:48 |
| hrw | as all I want is to get from A to B | 18:48 |
| sdake | cisco requires us to use specific carriers - and they handle all the travel parts | 18:48 |
| hrw | sure | 18:49 |
| hrw | Red Hat uses some travel agency but it does not cover Poland so I can choose whatever | 18:49 |
| sdake | and I can't even book it to my amex to earn points | 18:49 |
| sdake | ya I spent some time at red hat | 18:49 |
| hrw | amex... do not take it with you to europe | 18:49 |
| hrw | sdake: I know ;D | 18:50 |
| sdake | red hat went through a few trave l agendcies | 18:50 |
| sdake | hrw I have an amex and a visa | 18:50 |
| sdake | visa is for europe | 18:50 |
| sdake | amex is for everywhre visa is not accepted | 18:50 |
| sdake | i centralize everything on my amex - one bill to pay every month plus lots o points | 18:50 |
| hrw | sdake: ;) | 18:50 |
| sdake | the best part about amex is its not a credit card | 18:51 |
| sdake | so you really can't go into debt ;-) | 18:51 |
| hrw | ;) | 18:51 |
| sdake | if yo udont pay the bill, they shut it off (I assume, I have always paid my bill in full every month) | 18:51 |
| hrw | kolla is perfect tool to make machine busy... lot of i/o and cpu used | 18:51 |
| sdake | hrw kolla-build is very busy | 18:52 |
| hrw | yep | 18:52 |
| hrw | especially without -T1 | 18:52 |
| sdake | yar - I have gige, and arizona is the central peering location for netwroking in the united states | 18:52 |
| sdake | so my internet is *really* fast | 18:52 |
| hrw | 146 containers so far | 18:52 |
| hrw | I have 250/20Mbps | 18:53 |
| hrw | but still a way to inject proxy into kolla would be lovely | 18:53 |
| sdake | thats pretty good | 18:53 |
| sdake | there is a way to do proxy with kolla | 18:53 |
| sdake | that problem has long since been solved | 18:53 |
| hrw | http_proxy is one thing. apt has own proxy settings | 18:58 |
| hrw | +{% block base_ubuntu_package_apt_conf %} | 18:59 |
| hrw | +COPY apt_conf.{{ base_distro }} /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/ | 18:59 |
| hrw | +{% endblock %} | 18:59 |
| hrw | in docker/base/Dockerfile.j2 handles it | 18:59 |
| hrw | I have 10GB squid proxy in lan | 18:59 |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 19:03 | |
| *** Pavo has quit IRC | 19:03 | |
| hrw | bye | 19:05 |
| *** pcaruana has joined #openstack-kolla | 19:12 | |
| *** vcn[m] has joined #openstack-kolla | 19:14 | |
| sdake | hrw im off as well enjoy | 19:17 |
| *** rhallisey has joined #openstack-kolla | 19:19 | |
| *** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-kolla | 19:20 | |
| *** salv-orlando has quit IRC | 19:24 | |
| *** mattmceuen has joined #openstack-kolla | 19:27 | |
| *** mgoddard has joined #openstack-kolla | 19:27 | |
| *** fragatina has joined #openstack-kolla | 19:33 | |
| *** fragatina has quit IRC | 19:37 | |
| *** fragatina has joined #openstack-kolla | 19:38 | |
| *** sdake_ has joined #openstack-kolla | 19:46 | |
| *** sdake has quit IRC | 19:48 | |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-kolla | 19:50 | |
| openstackgerrit | Marcin Juszkiewicz proposed openstack/kolla master: debian: enable all images enabled for Ubuntu https://review.openstack.org/432787 | 19:50 |
| *** eaguilar_ has quit IRC | 19:55 | |
| *** matrohon has joined #openstack-kolla | 19:55 | |
| *** mannamne has joined #openstack-kolla | 19:56 | |
| *** bachp has joined #openstack-kolla | 19:58 | |
| *** retr0h has joined #openstack-kolla | 19:58 | |
| *** sdake_ has quit IRC | 20:02 | |
| *** sdake has joined #openstack-kolla | 20:06 | |
| *** sdake has quit IRC | 20:14 | |
| *** sdake has joined #openstack-kolla | 20:14 | |
| *** schwicht_at_work has quit IRC | 20:24 | |
| sbezverk | sdake: if you want to chat, I will be back in 10 minutes with my coffee and ready | 20:25 |
| sdake | ok | 20:25 |
| *** fragatina has quit IRC | 20:26 | |
| *** sdake has quit IRC | 20:34 | |
| *** sdake has joined #openstack-kolla | 20:37 | |
| *** tonanhngo has joined #openstack-kolla | 20:37 | |
| *** tonanhngo has quit IRC | 20:38 | |
| *** mdorman has joined #openstack-kolla | 20:39 | |
| *** bmace has quit IRC | 20:40 | |
| *** bmace has joined #openstack-kolla | 20:40 | |
| *** tvignaud has joined #openstack-kolla | 21:16 | |
| *** matrohon has quit IRC | 21:17 | |
| *** eaguilar has joined #openstack-kolla | 21:17 | |
| *** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-kolla | 21:21 | |
| *** eaguilar has quit IRC | 21:22 | |
| *** salv-orlando has quit IRC | 21:26 | |
| *** l4yerffeJ_ has joined #openstack-kolla | 21:34 | |
| *** Jeffrey4l_ has joined #openstack-kolla | 21:35 | |
| *** Jeffrey4l has quit IRC | 21:35 | |
| *** l4yerffeJ has quit IRC | 21:35 | |
| *** pcaruana has quit IRC | 21:42 | |
| *** sdake_ has joined #openstack-kolla | 21:44 | |
| *** sdake has quit IRC | 21:48 | |
| *** l4yerffeJ_ has quit IRC | 21:52 | |
| *** l4yerffeJ_ has joined #openstack-kolla | 21:52 | |
| *** tvignaud has quit IRC | 21:57 | |
| *** n0isyn0ise has quit IRC | 21:58 | |
| *** n0isyn0ise has joined #openstack-kolla | 22:00 | |
| *** l4yerffeJ_ has quit IRC | 22:01 | |
| *** l4yerffeJ_ has joined #openstack-kolla | 22:01 | |
| *** sdake_ has quit IRC | 22:02 | |
| *** sdake has joined #openstack-kolla | 22:02 | |
| *** mannamne has quit IRC | 22:03 | |
| *** mattmceuen has quit IRC | 22:28 | |
| *** rwallner has joined #openstack-kolla | 22:42 | |
| *** financeMan has joined #openstack-kolla | 22:46 | |
| *** mgoddard has quit IRC | 22:50 | |
| financeMan | howdy, how do I pull down a stable branch of kolla for deploy? | 22:50 |
| financeMan | kolla-ansible pull -branch branchname? | 22:51 |
| *** sdake has quit IRC | 22:52 | |
| *** mattmceuen has joined #openstack-kolla | 22:52 | |
| *** mannamne has joined #openstack-kolla | 23:01 | |
| sbezverk | financeMan: git clone kolla-ansible /cd kolla-ansible / git checkout {branch you want} | 23:03 |
| financeMan | am I able to do a apt-get install openstack-kolla yet :)? | 23:05 |
| financeMan | i totally blew my kolla instance | 23:07 |
| financeMan | and I think its cause i pulled master and it's not stable sbezverk | 23:08 |
| sbezverk | financeMan: I really doubt that master is that unstable.. | 23:08 |
| *** goldyfruit has joined #openstack-kolla | 23:15 | |
| *** goldyfruit has quit IRC | 23:15 | |
| financeMan | sbezverk I ran "kolla-ansible deploy" and got "Starting Heka Container -> Internal Server Error (\"{\"message\":\"maximum retry count cannot be used with restart policy \\'unless-stopped\" | 23:17 |
| sbezverk | financeMan: there might be 1024 reason for this error, in 99.99% cases is misconfiguration.. | 23:22 |
| *** salv-orlando has joined #openstack-kolla | 23:22 | |
| sbezverk | I suggest you carfully examin your configuration and the destination system. | 23:22 |
| financeMan | sbezverk http://pastebin.com/hvPbeXhC | 23:23 |
| financeMan | single node machine | 23:23 |
| sbezverk | financeMan: kolla-ansible docs are in good shape, you need to make sure that the host where you install complies with all requirements.. | 23:25 |
| sbezverk | financeMan: one of the reason why I think it is your local machine problem is master runs at the gate now and it does not show failures | 23:25 |
| *** salv-orlando has quit IRC | 23:27 | |
| financeMan | sbezverk I tried to destroy my instances through kolla-ansible destroy and the now deploy don't work | 23:32 |
| financeMan | it used to be fine | 23:32 |
| financeMan | is there any commands I can from to just start from scratch? | 23:32 |
| financeMan | delete the kolla folder? | 23:32 |
| *** dtturner has quit IRC | 23:33 | |
| *** dtturner has joined #openstack-kolla | 23:34 | |
| sbezverk | financeMan: no, there is a tool that helps you to really clean up, 1 sec, let me check | 23:36 |
| *** jmccarthy has quit IRC | 23:36 | |
| sbezverk | financeMan: in kolla-ansible/tools folder | 23:37 |
| sbezverk | there are some cleanup_* script | 23:37 |
| sbezverk | they will help you to make sure that all leftovers from previous installation are gone | 23:37 |
| *** rwallner_ has joined #openstack-kolla | 23:47 | |
| *** rwallner has quit IRC | 23:47 | |
| *** rwallner_ has quit IRC | 23:52 | |
| openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/kolla master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/431961 | 23:57 |
| openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/kolla-ansible master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/431962 | 23:57 |
| *** financeMan has quit IRC | 23:58 | |
| *** jrobinson has joined #openstack-kolla | 23:59 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!