| *** elodilles_pto is now known as elodilles | 07:01 | |
| opendevreview | daniel.pawlik proposed openstack/ci-log-processing master: Change OpenSearch services version for CI tests to 2.11.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ci-log-processing/+/890343 | 07:12 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/project-config master: Add frrouting role to gerritbot https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/916742 | 08:19 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/project-config master: Add frrouting role to gerritbot https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/916742 | 10:52 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/project-config master: Add new repository powertrain-build https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/916038 | 13:43 |
| clarkb | sean-k-mooney: am I remembering correctly that upstream Ceph indicated that we shouldn't count on reliably updated ceph packaging for new releases like jammy or noble and that people should use cephadm? I seem to recall this came up when openstack moved testing to jammy and the ceph devstack stuff had to be rewritten to use cephadm as a result | 15:19 |
| clarkb | sean-k-mooney: this has come up because people have asked about mirroring newer ceph releases and I'm pushing back a bit due to the lack of upstream support for the packages in the first place. But jrosser_ points out that there are jammy packages now. It is possible I misremember or that ceph has changed their position | 15:20 |
| clarkb | my main concern is I don't want to keep mirroring ceph if upstream isn't providing it with a sufficient level of support to make it worthwhile. For example will we wait a couple yaers for noble packaging? If so I think that is a good indicator that we shouldn't bother | 15:21 |
| jrosser_ | there is an entire page in the latest docs about installing from packages | 15:22 |
| jrosser_ | https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/install/get-packages/ | 15:22 |
| jrosser_ | fwiw i am just mentioning this because of course in the project i contribute to we use the package install and ceph-ansible | 15:23 |
| clarkb | right and we're nto saying you can't choose to do that. This is more about whether or not opendev continues to act for a proxy for "why can't I install ceph this way" | 15:23 |
| clarkb | which if ceph has gone back to supporting is unlikely to be an issue but if it is still something upstream wants peopel to avoid then I also want to avoid being caught in the middle | 15:24 |
| clarkb | especially since ceph mirroring is extremely labor intensive compared to everything else we mirror | 15:24 |
| clarkb | (its a side effect of how every ceph release gets a new repo) | 15:25 |
| sean-k-mooney | so i think the real question is will the ceph comuinty provide deb releases | 15:37 |
| sean-k-mooney | that can be consumed on ubuntu 22.04 | 15:37 |
| sean-k-mooney | or 24.04 | 15:37 |
| sean-k-mooney | my understanding is that redhats ceph teams have mainly moved to ibm | 15:38 |
| sean-k-mooney | lookign at https://download.ceph.com/ | 15:38 |
| clarkb | There are 22.04 packages now | 15:39 |
| sean-k-mooney | it appears that there are both deb and rpm packages | 15:39 |
| clarkb | re the team moving maybe that explains the change in approach for packaging | 15:42 |
| clarkb | and if that is the case then mirroring ceph is probably a reasonable thing to do again | 15:44 |
| sean-k-mooney | ya im not sure | 15:44 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/project-config master: Support Ubuntu 24.04 in nodepool elements https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/916050 | 19:21 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/project-config master: Add C-state management App to StarlingX https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/914817 | 22:18 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/project-config master: Add reference to the project-team-guide in the fail ci msg https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/914189 | 22:41 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!