| opendevreview | Nitish Venkata Patcherla proposed openstack/horizon master: Add Rules operation to Network QoS Policy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/horizon/+/805360 | 10:58 |
|---|---|---|
| vishalmanchanda | #startmeeting horizon | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting started Wed Oct 6 15:00:11 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is vishalmanchanda. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:00 |
| opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'horizon' | 15:00 |
| rdopiera | o/ | 15:00 |
| tmazur | o/ | 15:00 |
| vishalmanchanda | hello everyone. | 15:00 |
| vishalmanchanda | Let's wait for few minutes if more people join us. | 15:01 |
| amotoki | o/ | 15:02 |
| vishalmanchanda | e0ne: around? | 15:02 |
| e0ne | hi | 15:02 |
| vishalmanchanda | Let's start the meeting. | 15:02 |
| vishalmanchanda | #topic Notices | 15:02 |
| vishalmanchanda | Openstack Xena was officially released today. | 15:03 |
| vishalmanchanda | http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-October/025214.html | 15:03 |
| vishalmanchanda | Thanks to everyone for contributing in Xena release and now the Yoga release is open for development. | 15:03 |
| vishalmanchanda | Also Please start adding your topic which you want to discuss during the PTG. | 15:04 |
| e0ne | vishalmanchanda: thanks for wearing a PTL hat this release! | 15:04 |
| amotoki | +1 | 15:04 |
| vishalmanchanda | e0ne: 🙂 | 15:04 |
| vishalmanchanda | etherpad link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/horizon-yoga-ptg | 15:05 |
| vishalmanchanda | I can see we have only a few topics for discussion as of now. | 15:06 |
| vishalmanchanda | I will also add if I got any topic to discuss and assign time slots for each topic by Friday. | 15:06 |
| vishalmanchanda | Feel free to reach me in case if you like to attend some topics discussion but the assigned time slot doesn't work for you. | 15:07 |
| vishalmanchanda | Also looks like we have to cancel Monday, October 18 time slot for ptg because I have to attend TC+PTL interaction session at the same time. | 15:07 |
| vishalmanchanda | Anyway I will share the same info. on open-discuss ML about the PTG time slots. | 15:08 |
| vishalmanchanda | that's all announcement from my side for this week. | 15:09 |
| amotoki | vishalmanchanda: I think it is better to add it to the schedule to join TC/PTL interaction :) | 15:09 |
| amotoki | and as a friendly reminder let's register the PTG if you join https://www.openstack.org/ptg/ | 15:09 |
| e0ne | amotoki: +1 | 15:09 |
| vishalmanchanda | amotoki: +1. | 15:09 |
| vishalmanchanda | moving to next topic. | 15:10 |
| vishalmanchanda | #topic Stable-branches | 15:10 |
| vishalmanchanda | Please take a look at the patch which fixes the stable branches gate, actually it just drops lower-constraints job from stable branches. | 15:11 |
| vishalmanchanda | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%2522drop-l-c%2522+status:open+project:openstack/horizon | 15:11 |
| vishalmanchanda | Also, amotoki raise a concern that when we should drop lower-constraints job from stable branches. | 15:12 |
| amotoki | vishalmanchanda: sure. rdopiera already reviewed them, thanks | 15:12 |
| vishalmanchanda | When a stable branch is created or when a lower constraint job starts failing for that branch and we should document this point. | 15:13 |
| vishalmanchanda | I am fine with both option but I would like to hear from the team. | 15:13 |
| amotoki | IMHO I tend to prefer to dropping it when it starts to fail as it sometimes raises a good point to us. | 15:14 |
| amotoki | (and if a fix is trivial it is worth fixing it) | 15:14 |
| rdopiera | either is reasonable in my opinion | 15:15 |
| rdopiera | keeping it if it works seems like a win | 15:15 |
| amotoki | this is just my preference. I am okay with either too. | 15:15 |
| vishalmanchanda | ok I will abandon my patch from stable/xena branch as lower-constraints job is not failing there. | 15:17 |
| amotoki | Although I did not follow all discussions, there is a discussion on pinning base python dependencies like setuptools/pip in stable branches. It might help us. | 15:18 |
| vishalmanchanda | that's all topic from my side for this week. | 15:18 |
| vishalmanchanda | #topic open-discussion | 15:19 |
| amotoki | does anyone have bugs to be raised here? | 15:19 |
| vishalmanchanda | I would like to see more feedback on rdopiera patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/horizon/+/810224 | 15:20 |
| vishalmanchanda | I already mention one of my concern there. | 15:20 |
| amotoki | vishalmanchanda: what is your concern? | 15:21 |
| amotoki | does it change the current behavior with the default policy rules? | 15:22 |
| rdopiera | I admit it's a very rare case they ran into. | 15:22 |
| vishalmanchanda | amotoki: yes. | 15:22 |
| vishalmanchanda | amotoki: it also hides 'port security' checkbox even with the current default policy. | 15:22 |
| amotoki | vishalmanchanda: okay. I will check it this week | 15:22 |
| vishalmanchanda | amotoki: thanks. | 15:23 |
| vishalmanchanda | Does anyone have any other topic to discuss? | 15:23 |
| amotoki | rdopiera: I don't think so. customizing policy rules is not rare | 15:23 |
| rdopiera | vishalmanchanda: does it? it should only hide it if you don't have the rights to change it | 15:23 |
| rdopiera | I would like to talk briefly about the system scope tokens | 15:24 |
| rdopiera | I looked briefly into what we will need, and I created bugs in keystoneclient and keystoneauth to add the APIs we will need | 15:24 |
| vishalmanchanda | rdopiera: yes, I tried a couple of cases, I will add my comments in patch review. | 15:24 |
| rdopiera | https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-keystoneclient/+bug/1945649 | 15:25 |
| rdopiera | https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystoneauth/+bug/1945657 | 15:25 |
| rdopiera | I also made a patch for keystoneclient for this, but I will need help making the patch for keystoneauth | 15:25 |
| rdopiera | the patch is failing CI right now for unrelated reasons -- seems their gate is broken | 15:26 |
| rdopiera | vishalmanchanda: thanks, if it does, it's a bug in my patch | 15:26 |
| vishalmanchanda | rdopiera patch link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-keystoneclient/+/811966 | 15:27 |
| amotoki | I would like to say sorry in this area in xena (as I felt a burnout a bit....) | 15:28 |
| amotoki | rdopiera: is it documented in the keystone API reference? | 15:28 |
| rdopiera | amotoki: yes, the bugs have links to api docs | 15:29 |
| rdopiera | well, ok, one of them has a link | 15:29 |
| rdopiera | I need to add the link to the other | 15:29 |
| rdopiera | good point, thanks | 15:29 |
| amotoki | ah... I just opened the first one :-( | 15:29 |
| rdopiera | it seems we will need an addiitonal parameter for Token creation | 15:30 |
| rdopiera | to make it system-scoped | 15:30 |
| amotoki | from unscoped token to system-scoped? | 15:31 |
| rdopiera | yeah | 15:31 |
| rdopiera | that's the keystoneauth bug basically | 15:31 |
| rdopiera | I will add details | 15:31 |
| amotoki | ah, I just tried keystone API directly... | 15:31 |
| rdopiera | we should probably be using the library, ultimately | 15:32 |
| amotoki | yeah, agree | 15:32 |
| rdopiera | we can of course continue developent with direct calls while this is not merged | 15:33 |
| rdopiera | development* | 15:33 |
| rdopiera | amotoki: I've been pretty much psychologically blocked with this myself too. | 15:33 |
| rdopiera | amotoki: It's difficult. No worries. | 15:34 |
| amotoki | rdopiera: hehe. I will be involved in the effort in Yoga too :-) | 15:35 |
| rdopiera | we do want to try to get this working until our downstream freeze on Nov 25th | 15:35 |
| vishalmanchanda | We can check with keystone team if we can have priority for this patch. | 15:35 |
| rdopiera | but obviously it's a bit of wishful thinking at this point | 15:35 |
| amotoki | rdopiera: if you work on it publicly, i will try to help it | 15:36 |
| rdopiera | amotoki: thanks a lot! I really appreciate it! | 15:36 |
| rdopiera | vishalmanchanda: I need to go to them and ask for help implementing it anyways. | 15:37 |
| vishalmanchanda | rdopiera: +1. | 15:37 |
| amotoki | perhaps we can call the keystone API directly first (if the libs do not work as expected) | 15:38 |
| amotoki | anyway feedback to keystone would be useful | 15:38 |
| rdopiera | amotoki: sounds good | 15:38 |
| rdopiera | amotoki: do you have any code already, or was it all lost in that crash? | 15:39 |
| amotoki | rdopiera: I did not try it after that.... but I can investigate it again | 15:39 |
| rdopiera | amotoki: I will try to put up a WIP patch this week | 15:39 |
| rdopiera | and we can discuss it on there then | 15:40 |
| amotoki | rdopiera: great. i will follow it up | 15:40 |
| vishalmanchanda | awesome. | 15:40 |
| vishalmanchanda | Does anyone have any other topic to discuss? | 15:41 |
| amotoki | none from me | 15:41 |
| rdopiera | nothing | 15:43 |
| vishalmanchanda | ok Let's end this meeting. | 15:43 |
| vishalmanchanda | Thanks everyone for joining! | 15:43 |
| vishalmanchanda | #endmeeting | 15:43 |
| opendevmeet | Meeting ended Wed Oct 6 15:43:50 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 15:43 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/horizon/2021/horizon.2021-10-06-15.00.html | 15:43 |
| opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/horizon/2021/horizon.2021-10-06-15.00.txt | 15:43 |
| opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/horizon/2021/horizon.2021-10-06-15.00.log.html | 15:43 |
| prometheanfire | would now be a good time to ask about XStatic-Angular===1.8.2.1 ? | 17:40 |
| opendevreview | Merged openstack/horizon master: Clean up extra spaces https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/horizon/+/809199 | 20:43 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!