Thursday, 2022-03-17

opendevreviewRajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/glance_store master: Add coverage for add method  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance_store/+/83411508:44
opendevreviewRajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/glance_store master: Add coverage for StoreLocation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance_store/+/83353910:39
opendevreviewRajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/glance_store master: Add coverage for get_cinderclient and _check_context  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance_store/+/83375110:39
opendevreviewRajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/glance_store master: Add coverage for helper methods  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance_store/+/83376710:39
opendevreviewRajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/glance_store master: Add exception coverage for get, get_size, delete  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance_store/+/83398210:39
opendevreviewRajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/glance_store master: Add coverage for add method  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance_store/+/83411510:39
opendevreviewRajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/glance_store master: Remove redundant try except around volume create  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance_store/+/83415511:21
*** pdeore_ is now known as pdeore13:43
pdeoreabhishekk, rosmaita, jokke_, dansmith, croelandt, mrjoshi_  glance weekly meeting in 10 minutes at #openstack-meeting13:51
dansmithand I'll be there due to DST \o/13:51
pdeoregreat!! :D 13:54
*** tosky_ is now known as tosky14:27
dansmithabhishekk: why have you not +2 this yet? still looking?14:52
dansmithhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/glance-tempest-plugin/+/802792/17..19/glance_tempest_plugin/tests/rbac/v2/metadefs/test_resource_types.py14:52
abhishekkdansmith, looking14:53
dansmiththe changes to the lock and namespace naming look okay, but some fo the boolean logic in test_create_resource_type makes me worried that more changed since I reviewed last14:53
abhishekkline 157 you mean?14:55
dansmithand 179, etc14:55
abhishekkI ran those tests multiple times (25/30 times) in local environment couple of days back and didn't encounter any failure, but forget to mention that on patch14:56
dansmithI'm just not sure why they changed14:56
dansmithpdeore: ?14:56
dansmithabhishekk: but otherwise are you +2 on that?14:57
abhishekkI think we raise not found if we try to view namespace for other project14:57
dansmith...right14:58
dansmithwonder if it is related to L49 change?14:58
abhishekkright,14:59
abhishekkI found this gerrit version really confusing as it shows all the comments in recent patch :/15:00
abhishekkwill confirm this with pdeore, logically line no 49 sounds like the reason for changing the boolean check15:04
dansmithack sorry in tc meeting15:18
dansmithbut yeah, I assume that's it15:18
dansmithand yes, I hate the new gerrit's persistent comment thing :/15:18
dansmithyou have to mark them as resolved to make them go away15:18
abhishekkyeah15:20
dansmithabhishekk: can we officially adopt something similar in glance? https://docs.openstack.org/cinder/latest/contributor/gerrit.html#ci-job-rechecks15:28
dansmithwe're talking about it in -tc right now and you know my opinion on the topic :)15:28

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!