| *** longkb has joined #openstack-fwaas | 00:36 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-fwaas | 00:49 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 00:54 | |
| *** hoangcx has quit IRC | 01:50 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-fwaas | 01:50 | |
| *** hoangcx has joined #openstack-fwaas | 01:50 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 01:55 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-fwaas | 02:03 | |
| openstackgerrit | Kim Bao Long proposed openstack/neutron-fwaas master: [log] Logging driver based iptables for FWaaS https://review.openstack.org/553738 | 04:00 |
|---|---|---|
| *** njohnston has quit IRC | 04:07 | |
| *** reedip has quit IRC | 04:07 | |
| *** njohnston has joined #openstack-fwaas | 04:07 | |
| *** reedip has joined #openstack-fwaas | 04:19 | |
| *** velizarx has joined #openstack-fwaas | 06:56 | |
| *** velizarx has quit IRC | 07:13 | |
| *** velizarx has joined #openstack-fwaas | 07:22 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 07:48 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-fwaas | 08:44 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 08:50 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-fwaas | 09:46 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 09:51 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-fwaas | 10:03 | |
| *** hungpv has joined #openstack-fwaas | 10:26 | |
| *** velizarx has quit IRC | 10:53 | |
| *** reedip has quit IRC | 10:54 | |
| *** reedip has joined #openstack-fwaas | 11:07 | |
| *** velizarx has joined #openstack-fwaas | 11:09 | |
| *** hungpv has quit IRC | 11:20 | |
| *** longkb has quit IRC | 11:34 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 13:01 | |
| *** velizarx has quit IRC | 13:12 | |
| *** velizarx has joined #openstack-fwaas | 13:16 | |
| *** longkb has joined #openstack-fwaas | 13:18 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-fwaas | 13:28 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 13:29 | |
| *** hoangcx_ has joined #openstack-fwaas | 13:32 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-fwaas | 13:34 | |
| *** yamamoto_ has joined #openstack-fwaas | 13:41 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 13:41 | |
| *** hoangcx_ has quit IRC | 13:50 | |
| *** SridarK has joined #openstack-fwaas | 13:50 | |
| *** wkite has joined #openstack-fwaas | 13:51 | |
| *** wkite has quit IRC | 13:55 | |
| *** yushiro has joined #openstack-fwaas | 13:55 | |
| *** annp_ has joined #openstack-fwaas | 13:56 | |
| yushiro | annp hi | 13:56 |
| annp_ | yushiro, hi | 13:56 |
| yushiro | I built latest devstack with logging patch. However, q-svc cannot restart with following error: global name 'server_rpc' is not defined. | 13:57 |
| yushiro | Did you hit such error? | 13:57 |
| yushiro | I just applied 3 patches and ran 'sudo python setup.py install'. After that, I restarted q-svc.service. | 13:58 |
| annp_ | did you build with master branch or latest patch? | 13:58 |
| longkb | hmm | 13:58 |
| annp_ | longkb, did you see the error? | 13:59 |
| yushiro | deployed devstack with master branch, after that I applied each patches as longkb described on github. | 13:59 |
| longkb | yushiro, could you show me your error log? | 13:59 |
| longkb | I did not meet this error before | 13:59 |
| SridarK | Hi FWaaS folks | 13:59 |
| SridarK | shall we continue in the mtg | 13:59 |
| annp_ | yushiro, longkb can we discuss later? | 14:00 |
| yushiro | Hi SridarK :) | 14:00 |
| SridarK | #startmeeting fwaas | 14:00 |
| annp_ | hi SridarK | 14:00 |
| openstack | Meeting started Thu Jul 12 14:00:06 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is SridarK. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 14:00 |
| yushiro | annp_, Yeah, later is better. | 14:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 14:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: fwaas)" | 14:00 | |
| longkb | hi SridarK | 14:00 |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'fwaas' | 14:00 |
| SridarK | #chair yushiro xgerman_ | 14:00 |
| openstack | Current chairs: SridarK xgerman_ yushiro | 14:00 |
| SridarK | Just got back from long PTO | 14:00 |
| yushiro | Welcome back, SridarK :) | 14:00 |
| SridarK | sorry could not stay on top of things completely but caught up on logs | 14:00 |
| SridarK | so let me do my turn today | 14:01 |
| SridarK | thx xgerman_ and yushiro | 14:01 |
| yushiro | OK | 14:01 |
| xgerman_ | o/ | 14:01 |
| longkb | +1 SridarK | 14:01 |
| SridarK | #topic announcements | 14:01 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "announcements (Meeting topic: fwaas)" | 14:01 | |
| SridarK | we are getting close | 14:01 |
| SridarK | but seems like things are chugging along, lets get to updates quickly so we can focus on the patches | 14:02 |
| SridarK | #topic FWaaS logging | 14:02 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "FWaaS logging (Meeting topic: fwaas)" | 14:02 | |
| SridarK | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/529814/ | 14:02 |
| SridarK | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/553738/ | 14:02 |
| SridarK | annp_: longkb pls go ahead | 14:03 |
| longkb | Thanks SridarK | 14:03 |
| *** wkite has joined #openstack-fwaas | 14:03 | |
| SridarK | yushiro: i think u were just asking just as we started too | 14:03 |
| longkb | I draft a review plan for fwaas logging. You guys can check it in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Logging_service_for_FWaaS_review_plan | 14:04 |
| longkb | I also mark the order for review these patches | 14:04 |
| yushiro | SridarK, yeah, longkb explains about how to test. | 14:04 |
| SridarK | longkb: ah thx - very informative | 14:04 |
| SridarK | so we have dependencies on the neutron patches | 14:05 |
| longkb | thanks SridarK, yushiro | 14:05 |
| longkb | yep | 14:05 |
| SridarK | do u think the neutron patches will make it in time ? | 14:05 |
| longkb | annp_: how to you think? | 14:06 |
| annp_ | longkb, that's great | 14:06 |
| yushiro | SridarK, Currently, I think these patches in neutron are OK except some nits. However, it's better to ask Miguel for FFE. | 14:06 |
| SridarK | yushiro: ok | 14:07 |
| annp_ | yushiro +! | 14:07 |
| annp_ | SridarK, +! | 14:07 |
| longkb | annp_, yushiro: +1 | 14:07 |
| yushiro | And annp_ will ask Miguel and Jakub :) | 14:07 |
| SridarK | yushiro: so we will need an FFE for the FWaaS side as well | 14:07 |
| SridarK | if we have a dependency | 14:07 |
| yushiro | SridarK, Aha, yes. | 14:07 |
| annp_ | yushiro, I will ask Miguel in next neutron meeting for FFE | 14:08 |
| SridarK | annp_: +1 | 14:08 |
| SridarK | Do we need all 3 neutron patches to merge before merging any patch on FWaaS side ? | 14:08 |
| yushiro | I think YES. annp_ longkb , right? | 14:09 |
| longkb | SridarK: I think neutron patches should be merged first | 14:09 |
| annp_ | Sriark, yushiro, right. We need 3 patches to get merge first. | 14:09 |
| SridarK | ok so we will need 3 patches in neutron and 8 patches in FWaaS to merge on FFE | 14:10 |
| annp_ | Sridark, So please help us to review it. :) | 14:10 |
| SridarK | annp_: yes on it will work on it today | 14:10 |
| longkb | thanks SridarK | 14:10 |
| annp_ | SridarK, Thanks a ton! | 14:10 |
| SridarK | ok do u want to discuss any other issues here | 14:11 |
| annp_ | SridarK, please go ahead | 14:12 |
| yushiro | annp_, longkb As I said before, for testing perspective, in FWaaS side patches, do we need to add dependencies? | 14:12 |
| SridarK | i think if we document our test results in a similar manner to the review plan (which is great) - we make our chances better for FFE | 14:12 |
| yushiro | SridarK, +10 I think so. | 14:12 |
| annp_ | SridarK, +10. | 14:13 |
| longkb | SridarK, +10 | 14:13 |
| SridarK | Is that a 10 decimal or binary ? :-) (I am trying to be like yushiro ) :-) | 14:13 |
| *** velizarx has quit IRC | 14:14 | |
| SridarK | ok lets move on - i think we have a plan | 14:14 |
| yushiro | SridarK, Hahaha :p | 14:14 |
| SridarK | and now that i am back from PTO - i will also work on reviews | 14:14 |
| xgerman_ | sweet | 14:14 |
| SridarK | #topic Remote FWG | 14:14 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Remote FWG (Meeting topic: fwaas)" | 14:14 | |
| SridarK | xgerman_: pls go ahead | 14:14 |
| SridarK | #link https://review.openstack.org/#/c/521207/ | 14:15 |
| xgerman_ | Most of it is done but I am at my wits end with ovs… | 14:15 |
| xgerman_ | not sure how to debug that effectively :-( | 14:15 |
| SridarK | sigh - let me also reach out chandanc and annp is here too | 14:16 |
| xgerman_ | thanks — yeah, I could probably figure it out but I also have other priorities which eat up my time :-( | 14:16 |
| SridarK | xgerman_: yes indeed totally understand | 14:16 |
| annp_ | xgerman_, I have a question: There is no DENY action for each remote group rule? | 14:17 |
| xgerman_ | mmh, I thought I had deny | 14:17 |
| annp_ | xgerman_, I mean there are only ALLOW action for remote group rule, right? | 14:17 |
| xgerman_ | they are just a way to describe a group of ports so deny is plausible | 14:18 |
| xgerman_ | or more general we should support all actions | 14:18 |
| annp_ | xgerman_, OK. I got it. | 14:20 |
| yushiro | remote_group_id allows from all neutron ports which is associated with its firewall_group, right? | 14:20 |
| yushiro | oops, sorry. remote_firewall_group_id. | 14:20 |
| annp_ | xgerman_, So we only support action "Allow" in remote group rule ATM? | 14:20 |
| xgerman_ | I can see also a use case where you would deny certain traffic from those ports | 14:20 |
| annp_ | xgerman_, right? | 14:20 |
| xgerman_ | I am confused then - I thought remote FWG is another way to describe ports and it’s independent of the action | 14:21 |
| SridarK | We should probab be in line with Remote SG here | 14:21 |
| SridarK | And the action is another attribute in the rule (which is independent) | 14:22 |
| xgerman_ | aka if I have a remote FWG describing web servers I would want to only allow certain traffic from there to a database and block the rest | 14:22 |
| xgerman_ | SridarK: +1 | 14:22 |
| annp_ | SridarK, +1 | 14:23 |
| annp_ | xgerman_, I got it. Thanks. | 14:23 |
| yushiro | Aha, if we use remote_fwg_id like SG, it means 'allow traffic from neutron ports'. However, we can also extend to use as 'deny' as SridarK said. | 14:23 |
| xgerman_ | yep, or drop | 14:24 |
| yushiro | xgerman_, I see :) | 14:24 |
| SridarK | I am not sure maybe we want alignment with SG - so there is no confusion with users | 14:24 |
| SridarK | *for users | 14:24 |
| annp_ | SridarK, +100 | 14:25 |
| xgerman_ | yeah, the simple case should align + more advanced users should get more latitude | 14:25 |
| yushiro | xgerman_, I think it's OK to support 'allow' first like SG. After that, we can also support 'drop' case :) | 14:25 |
| xgerman_ | +1 | 14:25 |
| yushiro | step by step :p | 14:25 |
| yushiro | Yeah | 14:25 |
| SridarK | xgerman_: ah yes exactyl what yushiro says | 14:25 |
| annp_ | SridarK, +1 | 14:26 |
| xgerman_ | +1 | 14:26 |
| annp_ | xgerman_, please go ahead | 14:29 |
| xgerman_ | yeah, the other two pieces are done (client + plugin) | 14:30 |
| SridarK | ok cool xgerman_ - i reached out to chandan too - if we can leverage some of his scripts for ovs debugging (i recall he had some things) | 14:30 |
| xgerman_ | that would be great!! | 14:30 |
| SridarK | ok cool - lets move on | 14:30 |
| xgerman_ | +1 | 14:30 |
| yushiro | +1 | 14:30 |
| annp_ | +1 | 14:31 |
| SridarK | #topic Bugs | 14:31 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Bugs (Meeting topic: fwaas)" | 14:31 | |
| SridarK | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1762454 | 14:31 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1762454 in neutron "FWaaS: Invalid port error on associating ports (distributed router) to firewall group" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to Yushiro FURUKAWA (y-furukawa-2) | 14:31 |
| SridarK | yushiro: thanks for picking this up | 14:31 |
| SridarK | some history - i had talked to | 14:31 |
| yushiro | You're welcome. | 14:31 |
| yushiro | OK | 14:32 |
| SridarK | swami before i left on PTO - i think we are good on the DVR side - i wanted to verify the ns implications where rules are applied | 14:32 |
| SridarK | but i had concerns on the HA side | 14:32 |
| SridarK | the validation check is easy but operationally i have some concerns | 14:33 |
| SridarK | hence i was a bit unsure - as it requires some thorough verification | 14:33 |
| SridarK | yushiro: not sure if u have more data on it | 14:33 |
| yushiro | SridarK, I just checked 'device_owner' of each case and namespace structure.. Not tested yet. | 14:34 |
| SridarK | yushiro: ok | 14:34 |
| yushiro | each case means 1. DVR, 2. L3-HA 3.DVR + L3-HA | 14:34 |
| SridarK | yushiro: ok lets talk offline on it to make sure we have no issues | 14:35 |
| SridarK | I was good with (1) but (2) & (3) have some concerns on datapath | 14:35 |
| SridarK | yushiro: will sync up with u more on it | 14:35 |
| yushiro | SridarK, OK, thanks. | 14:36 |
| SridarK | any other bugs needing discussion | 14:36 |
| annp_ | SriarK, Hi | 14:36 |
| SridarK | annp_: pls go ahead | 14:36 |
| annp_ | In order to support wsgi server for neutron, there is a issue related fwaas rpc as http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-June/131722.html | 14:37 |
| annp_ | I and zigo try to fix that at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/580327/ | 14:37 |
| *** hongbin has joined #openstack-fwaas | 14:37 | |
| zigo | o/ | 14:38 |
| annp_ | and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/579433/ | 14:38 |
| zigo | I can confirm that the patch from annp_ works very well. | 14:38 |
| SridarK | ah yes | 14:38 |
| zigo | I would very much warmly welcome merging, that one plus the other wsgi patches for Neutron itself. | 14:38 |
| annp_ | zigo, Thanks zigo. | 14:38 |
| SridarK | annp_: zigo perfect many thx | 14:39 |
| xgerman_ | +1 | 14:39 |
| SridarK | will do | 14:39 |
| annp_ | +10 | 14:39 |
| yushiro | annp_, zigo Thanks. In order to check these behavior, do we need 2 patches (neutron + neutron-fwaas) | 14:39 |
| SridarK | is there a dependency we need to be aware off ? | 14:39 |
| zigo | I didn't check the v2 one though, only v1... | 14:39 |
| annp_ | yushiro, actually these patch doesn't depend on neutron. | 14:40 |
| SridarK | annp_: ok | 14:40 |
| annp_ | zigo, Could you please help us to verify with v2? | 14:40 |
| SridarK | will review | 14:40 |
| annp_ | SridarK, thanks! | 14:41 |
| yushiro | annp_, You mean, if we apply https://review.openstack.org/#/c/580327/ and deploy devstack. Then, we can check q-svc's status, right? | 14:41 |
| yushiro | oops, strange english ... | 14:42 |
| annp_ | yushrio, off-course! | 14:42 |
| yushiro | OK, will try it as well. | 14:42 |
| zigo | yushiro: You need 1/ the fix for neutron to load properly using neutron-api + neutron-rpc-server at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/555608/ | 14:42 |
| zigo | 2/ load neutron using uwsgi (if you're with devstack, some of these will help: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/580049/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/473718/ ) | 14:42 |
| zigo | 3/ the fwaas patches: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/580327/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/579433/ | 14:42 |
| zigo | All of these need to be merged. | 14:42 |
| zigo | Yeah, that one too... https://review.openstack.org/#/c/580327/ | 14:43 |
| yushiro | zigo, Thanks. Do I need to edit some config file ? | 14:43 |
| zigo | yushiro: If you're with devstack, I'm not sure, I do Debian packages integration, in my setup, it just work. | 14:43 |
| annp_ | zigo, These step is necessary if yushiro want to deploy neutron-api under uwsgi. otherwise we don't need. | 14:43 |
| zigo | yushiro: You can also just run Debian with puppet-openstack and it will setup everything for you automatically, though that's going to be Queens ... | 14:44 |
| yushiro | zigo, I usually use devstack :p But thanks :) | 14:44 |
| zigo | Right. | 14:44 |
| annp_ | yushrio, you can try with devstack by https://review.openstack.org/#/c/473718/ | 14:44 |
| yushiro | zigo, Aha!! I had asked you same question .. | 14:44 |
| yushiro | annp_, Thanks. | 14:45 |
| annp_ | yushrio, you should pull dow the patch and modify a bit https://review.openstack.org/#/c/473718/31/lib/neutron-legacy@94 | 14:46 |
| SridarK | Sounds good then we will target these 2 patches | 14:46 |
| annp_ | NEUTRON_DEPLOY_MOD_WSGI should be set True | 14:46 |
| yushiro | annp_, +1 . BTW, my name is yushiro. Haha :p | 14:47 |
| *** wkite has quit IRC | 14:47 | |
| annp_ | yushiro, oh, I'm so sorry. :) | 14:47 |
| SridarK | Although yushrio - has a nice ring to it too :-) | 14:47 |
| yushiro | :) | 14:47 |
| yushiro | annp_, no warries | 14:48 |
| SridarK | ok lets move on | 14:48 |
| annp_ | yushiro: thanks. :) | 14:48 |
| SridarK | #topic Address Groups | 14:48 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Address Groups (Meeting topic: fwaas)" | 14:48 | |
| annp_ | SridarK, thanks! | 14:48 |
| SridarK | oh looks like wkite is no longer here | 14:48 |
| yushiro | Oh, I couldn't reach out miguel this week.. | 14:49 |
| SridarK | yushiro: i will msg him | 14:49 |
| yushiro | SridarK, Thank you so much. | 14:49 |
| SridarK | more time zone aligned | 14:49 |
| SridarK | hopefully we can get a +A | 14:49 |
| SridarK | else it will be in S | 14:50 |
| SridarK | #topic Open Discussion | 14:50 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: fwaas)" | 14:50 | |
| SridarK | CFP closes soon | 14:50 |
| xgerman_ | yep | 14:51 |
| SridarK | annp_: u think u may be able to pull together something for L7 ? | 14:51 |
| SridarK | not sure if u had too much time to go thru it | 14:51 |
| SridarK | annp_: if u think u want to do something - we can talk on some possibilities | 14:51 |
| yushiro | +1 | 14:52 |
| annp_ | SridarK, yeah. I'd like to propose this for CFP. Do you want to become a speaker? | 14:52 |
| SridarK | annp_: lets talk more - sure i can help out | 14:53 |
| SridarK | annp_: but lets have a plan on the content | 14:53 |
| SridarK | annp_: lets talk offline | 14:53 |
| annp_ | SridarK, Yes. lets sync up via email. | 14:53 |
| SridarK | annp_: +1 | 14:54 |
| annp_ | SridarK, I also want to propose this topic for vietnam openstack day :) | 14:54 |
| yushiro | annp_, Sounds good :) | 14:54 |
| SridarK | annp_: ok good | 14:54 |
| xgerman_ | +1 | 14:54 |
| longkb | +1 annp_ | 14:55 |
| annp_ | SridarK, yushiro, xgerman_m thanks! :) | 14:55 |
| annp_ | longkb, thanks! | 14:55 |
| SridarK | ok if nothing else we can end | 14:56 |
| SridarK | Thx all for joining | 14:56 |
| yushiro | Thanks!! | 14:56 |
| SridarK | bye | 14:56 |
| longkb | bye guys | 14:56 |
| annp_ | thanks all. See you | 14:56 |
| SridarK | #endmeeting | 14:56 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Queens (Meeting topic: fwaas)" | 14:56 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Thu Jul 12 14:56:43 2018 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 14:56 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/fwaas/2018/fwaas.2018-07-12-14.00.html | 14:56 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/fwaas/2018/fwaas.2018-07-12-14.00.txt | 14:56 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/fwaas/2018/fwaas.2018-07-12-14.00.log.html | 14:56 |
| annp_ | yushiro, longkb, hi | 14:57 |
| yushiro | hi | 14:57 |
| longkb | hi annp_ | 14:57 |
| annp_ | yushiro, can you show me your log when you devstack with logging patch? | 14:57 |
| yushiro | sorry, I missed rebasing. I just removed some import line. | 14:58 |
| yushiro | Now, q-svc can run. Now, I'm trying to create some resources. | 14:58 |
| annp_ | yushiro, wow, OK. :) | 14:58 |
| yushiro | I have 1 bug ( not related logging) | 14:59 |
| annp_ | yushiro, What is your bug? | 15:00 |
| yushiro | If we applied a router port into default firewall_group, its status still 'INACTIVE'. | 15:00 |
| longkb | yushiro +100 | 15:00 |
| longkb | firewall group status is not stable, I think | 15:01 |
| annp_ | yushiro, hm I didn't play with this scenario. | 15:01 |
| yushiro | longkb, status logic is a little different b/w L3 and L2. | 15:01 |
| annp_ | yushiro, yes. So I think we should do some improve the logic of set_firewall_group_status | 15:02 |
| longkb | hmm, I think I should study more about fwaas :) | 15:03 |
| yushiro | I'll try to solve this bug. BTW, did you check log data is outputted into /var/log/syslog? | 15:03 |
| annp_ | yushiro, today, longkb had checked but we didn't see any log data in /var/log/syslog in his environment. | 15:04 |
| yushiro | longkb, If we associate L2 port with fwg, fwg's status is computed by _compute_status() in fwaas_v2.py. | 15:05 |
| annp_ | yushiro, So tomorrow, I'll debug that. Anyway, please help me to check log data in /var/log/syslog. | 15:06 |
| yushiro | longkb, In order to be 'ACTIVE', fwg needs ('ingress_firewall_policy_id' or 'egress_firewall_policy_id') and fwg port | 15:06 |
| longkb | yushiro: +1 I got it. | 15:07 |
| annp_ | yushiro, longkb, I have to go out now. So see you tomorrow. | 15:08 |
| yushiro | annp_, Thanks. See you. | 15:08 |
| longkb | G9 annp_ | 15:09 |
| annp_ | yushiro, longkb, thanks and G9 :) | 15:09 |
| *** annp_ has quit IRC | 15:09 | |
| yushiro | longkb, For L3 port, if we create/update with fwg port and 'admin_state_up' is UP, then changed into 'ACTIVE'. In other word, in L3 logic doesn't care 'ingress/egress_firewall_policy_id'. | 15:10 |
| longkb | hmm, I can see the difference bw L2 and L3 | 15:12 |
| yushiro | So, it's better to align with same logic for L2. | 15:14 |
| longkb | +1 yushiro :D | 15:18 |
| longkb | I have to off now. See you tomorrow | 15:19 |
| *** longkb has quit IRC | 15:21 | |
| *** yamamoto_ has quit IRC | 15:24 | |
| *** yushiro has quit IRC | 15:50 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-fwaas | 16:12 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 16:42 | |
| *** chandanc has joined #openstack-fwaas | 17:03 | |
| chandanc | hello xgerman_ | 17:06 |
| xgerman_ | hi | 17:06 |
| chandanc | Hello, do you have nay specific issue you want me to look at ? | 17:08 |
| chandanc | i did not see any driver code change in the patch | 17:09 |
| xgerman_ | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/564888/10 | 17:09 |
| chandanc | ok | 17:09 |
| xgerman_ | this is the OVS patch — I made it run without spying errors but I have trouble figuring out why it doesn’t do what I want it to do | 17:10 |
| chandanc | oh ok | 17:10 |
| xgerman_ | yeah, not sure how to debug it… | 17:12 |
| *** SridarK has quit IRC | 17:13 | |
| chandanc | sorry i am abit out of touch, do you have the spec for remoteFWG ? | 17:18 |
| chandanc | xgerman_: i will logout now, will go through the patch and get back , if you have the spec handy please share with me. | 17:22 |
| xgerman_ | https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/neutron-specs/specs/mitaka/fwaas-api-2.0.html | 17:23 |
| xgerman_ | it’s the original spec | 17:23 |
| chandanc | thanks xgerman_ catch you seeon | 17:28 |
| *** chandanc has quit IRC | 17:28 | |
| xgerman_ | thx | 17:34 |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-fwaas | 17:43 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 18:00 | |
| *** SridarK has joined #openstack-fwaas | 18:02 | |
| *** SridarK has quit IRC | 18:19 | |
| *** SridarK has joined #openstack-fwaas | 18:26 | |
| *** SridarK has quit IRC | 23:16 | |
| *** hongbin has quit IRC | 23:19 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!