| *** ZZelle has quit IRC | 00:04 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-fwaas | 00:26 | |
| *** hoangcx has joined #openstack-fwaas | 00:48 | |
| *** reedip has quit IRC | 00:59 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-fwaas | 01:12 | |
| *** cuongnv has joined #openstack-fwaas | 01:45 | |
| *** reedip has joined #openstack-fwaas | 02:27 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 02:32 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 02:41 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-fwaas | 02:48 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-fwaas | 02:57 | |
| *** yamamoto has quit IRC | 03:25 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 03:58 | |
| *** yamamoto has joined #openstack-fwaas | 04:09 | |
| *** chandanc_ has joined #openstack-fwaas | 04:38 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-fwaas | 04:59 | |
| *** padkrish has joined #openstack-fwaas | 05:00 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 05:04 | |
| chandanc_ | Hello padkrish | 05:04 |
|---|---|---|
| padkrish | hello chandanc_ | 05:05 |
| chandanc_ | do you want to setup the call ? | 05:05 |
| padkrish | sure, but do you want to wait for Sridar? | 05:06 |
| chandanc_ | ya sure | 05:06 |
| padkrish | let's give 5 mins.... | 05:06 |
| chandanc_ | ok | 05:06 |
| padkrish | i have pinged his cell | 05:06 |
| padkrish | lets see | 05:06 |
| chandanc_ | ok | 05:07 |
| padkrish | in the email, he has said 10-10.30... | 05:11 |
| chandanc_ | padkrish, let start the discussion, we can update him by mail | 05:11 |
| chandanc_ | yes | 05:11 |
| padkrish | so, should we wait till 10.30 and start? | 05:11 |
| chandanc_ | 10 or 10:30 | 05:11 |
| padkrish | yes, i don't believe we fixed the time at 10 | 05:12 |
| padkrish | right? | 05:12 |
| chandanc_ | its already 10:40 | 05:12 |
| chandanc_ | oh you mean US time ? | 05:12 |
| padkrish | yeah | 05:12 |
| chandanc_ | ok | 05:12 |
| padkrish | if you have other meetings, we can start now and i can update him | 05:12 |
| chandanc_ | no the mail says IST | 05:12 |
| chandanc_ | sure, we can have a quick one | 05:13 |
| padkrish | Thanks Chandan. Shall we try for Tue morning (IST)/Mon night (PDT) ? Possibly around 10am or 10:30am India time ? | 05:13 |
| padkrish | anyways :) | 05:13 |
| padkrish | let me send a webex | 05:14 |
| chandanc_ | sure | 05:14 |
| padkrish | have sent the invite | 05:16 |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-fwaas | 05:34 | |
| *** chandanc_ has quit IRC | 06:03 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 06:34 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-fwaas | 06:47 | |
| *** amotoki_ has joined #openstack-fwaas | 07:00 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 07:03 | |
| *** padkrish has quit IRC | 07:07 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-fwaas | 07:18 | |
| *** amotoki_ has quit IRC | 07:21 | |
| *** padkrish has joined #openstack-fwaas | 07:46 | |
| *** padkrish has quit IRC | 08:05 | |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: Wiki is broken with database problems, we are working to resolve it | 08:30 | |
| *** ChanServ changes topic to "Wiki is broken with database problems, we are working to resolve it" | 08:30 | |
| *** ChanServ changes topic to "#openstack-fwaas" | 08:39 | |
| -openstackstatus- NOTICE: Wiki problems have been fixed, it's up and running | 08:39 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 08:53 | |
| *** reedip has quit IRC | 08:56 | |
| *** reedip has joined #openstack-fwaas | 09:09 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-fwaas | 09:54 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 09:58 | |
| *** cuongnv has quit IRC | 10:10 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 10:17 | |
| *** hoangcx has quit IRC | 10:19 | |
| *** reedip has quit IRC | 10:30 | |
| *** faizy has joined #openstack-fwaas | 10:56 | |
| *** faizy has quit IRC | 10:59 | |
| *** faizy has joined #openstack-fwaas | 11:00 | |
| *** faizy_ has joined #openstack-fwaas | 11:24 | |
| *** faizy has quit IRC | 11:25 | |
| *** reedip has joined #openstack-fwaas | 11:33 | |
| *** amotoki has joined #openstack-fwaas | 11:36 | |
| *** faizy_ has quit IRC | 11:48 | |
| *** vks1 has joined #openstack-fwaas | 13:09 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-fwaas | 13:14 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 13:20 | |
| *** faizy_ has joined #openstack-fwaas | 13:31 | |
| *** faizy__ has joined #openstack-fwaas | 13:33 | |
| *** faizy_ has quit IRC | 13:36 | |
| *** SarathMekala has joined #openstack-fwaas | 13:41 | |
| *** hoangcx has joined #openstack-fwaas | 13:49 | |
| *** faizy__ has quit IRC | 13:51 | |
| *** ZZelle_ has left #openstack-fwaas | 13:59 | |
| *** chandanc_ has joined #openstack-fwaas | 13:59 | |
| *** ZZelle has joined #openstack-fwaas | 13:59 | |
| *** ZZelle is now known as Guest93672 | 14:00 | |
| *** Guest93672 is now known as ZZelle__ | 14:01 | |
| *** ZZelle__ is now known as ZZelle_ | 14:04 | |
| *** vishwanathj has joined #openstack-fwaas | 14:36 | |
| *** SarathMekala has quit IRC | 14:51 | |
| *** faizy has joined #openstack-fwaas | 14:57 | |
| *** annp has joined #openstack-fwaas | 14:57 | |
| reedip | hi | 15:00 |
| *** yushiro has joined #openstack-fwaas | 15:00 | |
| annp | hi | 15:00 |
| *** chandanc_ has quit IRC | 15:00 | |
| *** SridarK has joined #openstack-fwaas | 15:00 | |
| yushiro | hi | 15:00 |
| reedip | SridarK about the bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1623099 | 15:00 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1623099 in neutron "FWaaSv2 - 'firewall_policy_id' is missing in firewall_rule response body" [Low,New] - Assigned to Reedip (reedip-banerjee) | 15:00 |
| SridarK | reedip: hi | 15:02 |
| reedip | Hi SridarK | 15:02 |
| reedip | about that, we had a small discussion in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/370731/ | 15:03 |
| SridarK | yes the key thing is that now since rules can be associated with multiple policies | 15:03 |
| SridarK | we need to reflect that in the response | 15:04 |
| *** hoangcx has quit IRC | 15:04 | |
| SridarK | earlier it was easier with a single association | 15:04 |
| SridarK | I think i put a todo on this when i coded the db layer for v2 | 15:04 |
| SridarK | i dont recall exactly there was some complexity so we decided that we can live with this initially | 15:05 |
| SridarK | so other dependent patches can make fwd progress | 15:05 |
| reedip | SridarK : ok | 15:06 |
| SridarK | let me go back and look at the review | 15:07 |
| reedip | SridarK : IMHO, we can keep firewall_policies as [] in firewall_rules | 15:07 |
| SridarK | reedip: yes that is the thought | 15:07 |
| reedip | bcz one rule cant rule them all, one rule cant find them ... one rule cant win them all and in the FWG bind them :D | 15:08 |
| yushiro | SridarK, reedip : firewall_policy includes 'firewall_rules' and firewall_rule includes 'firewall_policies' ? | 15:08 |
| SridarK | LOTR ;-) | 15:08 |
| reedip | SridarK : Yessss ! | 15:08 |
| reedip | yushiro : now a days code is also complicated ....:) And yess ... | 15:09 |
| reedip | yushiro : that was your bug :)\ | 15:09 |
| SridarK | we will need to derive this from the policy rule association | 15:09 |
| yushiro | reedip, yes, I just remembered :) ahaha | 15:09 |
| yushiro | Is annp here ? | 15:09 |
| annp | yes. | 15:09 |
| annp | i'm here. :) | 15:10 |
| SridarK | reedip: let me look as well and we can discuss more | 15:10 |
| reedip | SridarK_ : Ok, please put your thoughts on the review, I will resurrect it tomorrow | 15:10 |
| reedip | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/370731/ | 15:10 |
| annp | As I mentioned on the meeting. I'd like to make netlink conntrack more maintainable to pyroute2 than using libnetfilter conntrack ctypes binding. Something related netlink was discussion here https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1492714. | 15:10 |
| annp | what do you think? | 15:10 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1492714 in neutron "RFE: Pure Python driven Linux network configuration" [Wishlist,New] | 15:10 |
| SridarK | i will step away to get ready to head to work | 15:10 |
| reedip | and I will step away to sleep ! :| | 15:10 |
| yushiro | annp, could you explain it again for others?( I mean that could you paste previous message?) | 15:10 |
| *** faizy has quit IRC | 15:10 | |
| *** faizy has joined #openstack-fwaas | 15:11 | |
| yushiro | reedip, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/370731/ I'll review it too. | 15:12 |
| annp | yushiro, currently, we're using a python binding for libnetlink_conntrack for improve performance | 15:13 |
| reedip | yushiro : if you have time, sure :) | 15:13 |
| yushiro | annp, yes. | 15:13 |
| annp | yushiro, libnetlink_conntrack is shared library written by C | 15:13 |
| *** faizy_ has joined #openstack-fwaas | 15:14 | |
| annp | yushiro, So, maintaining for a ctypes binding is more difficult than a pure python netlink. | 15:15 |
| *** padkrish has joined #openstack-fwaas | 15:15 | |
| annp | yushiro, I'd like to support netlink_conntrack to pyrout2, then we can use pyroute2 for netlink solution in fwaas. | 15:16 |
| annp | yushiro, that's my idea. | 15:17 |
| *** faizy__ has joined #openstack-fwaas | 15:17 | |
| *** faizy has quit IRC | 15:18 | |
| yushiro | annp(or Tu), OK. so, is there some performance difference b/w libnetlink_conntrack and netlink_conntrack? | 15:18 |
| yushiro | If we can improve performance by using netlink_conntrack, I think it's better to support. | 15:19 |
| *** faizy_ has quit IRC | 15:20 | |
| *** faizy__ has quit IRC | 15:21 | |
| annp | about performance between libnetlink_conntrack ctype binding and a native netlink conntrack in pyroute2. I think netlink conntrack in pyroute will slower by libnetlink_conntrack is C code. :) But I'm not sure. | 15:21 |
| *** faizy__ has joined #openstack-fwaas | 15:21 | |
| annp | However, using netlink conntrack native will be more maintainable. | 15:21 |
| annp | about performance between libnetlink_conntrack ctype binding and a native netlink conntrack in pyroute2. I think netlink conntrack in pyroute will slower because libnetlink_conntrack is written by C code. :) But I'm not sure | 15:22 |
| annp | yushiro, what do you think? | 15:23 |
| yushiro | annp, I understand your point. So, you or Tu may check performance again by using netlink_conntrack in pyroute2. | 15:23 |
| *** faizy__ has quit IRC | 15:24 | |
| annp | currently, netlink conntrack haven't supported in pyroute2 yet. We're planning to do that. | 15:24 |
| *** faizy__ has joined #openstack-fwaas | 15:24 | |
| yushiro | annp, aha, OK. Is it in Pike-2 ? | 15:25 |
| annp | It's just idea. It's under discussion on https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1492714. | 15:25 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1492714 in neutron "RFE: Pure Python driven Linux network configuration" [Wishlist,New] | 15:25 |
| *** faizy__ has quit IRC | 15:26 | |
| *** faizy__ has joined #openstack-fwaas | 15:27 | |
| annp | yushiro, I'm not sure. Anyway, we can replace libnetfilter_conntrack when netlink conntrack is available on pyroute2. | 15:28 |
| annp | yushiro, Let's discuss it later. Is it ok? | 15:28 |
| yushiro | annp, Yes. IMO, I agree with you opinion if we can achieve performance improvement by using netlink_conntrack on pyroute2. | 15:29 |
| annp | yushiro, I think it's better for maintainer. :) | 15:29 |
| *** faizy__ has quit IRC | 15:29 | |
| *** faizy__ has joined #openstack-fwaas | 15:30 | |
| annp | yushiro, thanks for discussion. | 15:31 |
| annp | yushiro, SridarK, reedip, I should go to sleep. See you tomorrow. :) | 15:34 |
| reedip | :) | 15:35 |
| yushiro | me too.. | 15:38 |
| yushiro | Good night | 15:38 |
| reedip | yushiro : It was android 16 ! | 15:38 |
| reedip | kame-hame-ha !!! | 15:38 |
| annp | G9 | 15:39 |
| *** annp has quit IRC | 15:39 | |
| *** yushiro has quit IRC | 15:48 | |
| *** padkrish has quit IRC | 16:01 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-fwaas | 16:02 | |
| *** mickeys has quit IRC | 16:06 | |
| *** amotoki has quit IRC | 16:13 | |
| *** vks1 has quit IRC | 16:39 | |
| *** faizy__ has quit IRC | 16:40 | |
| *** mickeys has joined #openstack-fwaas | 16:58 | |
| *** SridarK has quit IRC | 17:21 | |
| *** SridarK has joined #openstack-fwaas | 18:17 | |
| *** SridarK has quit IRC | 22:41 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!