Tuesday, 2017-03-07

*** khushbu has joined #openstack-dns00:02
*** khushbu has quit IRC00:07
*** ianychoi has quit IRC00:10
*** ianychoi has joined #openstack-dns00:11
*** hoangcx has joined #openstack-dns00:32
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-dns00:48
*** EricGonc_ has joined #openstack-dns00:50
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC00:52
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns00:54
*** cuongnv has joined #openstack-dns00:55
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC00:56
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns00:57
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-dns01:05
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC01:08
*** EricGonc_ has quit IRC01:08
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-dns01:11
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns01:32
*** yee379 has quit IRC01:33
*** yee379 has joined #openstack-dns01:34
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC01:38
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-dns01:39
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC01:47
*** tdink has quit IRC01:53
*** khushbu has joined #openstack-dns01:56
*** khushbu has quit IRC02:01
*** trugnvfet has joined #openstack-dns02:12
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns02:16
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC02:18
*** khushbu has joined #openstack-dns02:27
*** khushbu has quit IRC02:32
*** khushbu has joined #openstack-dns02:37
*** khushbu has quit IRC02:42
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns03:00
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC03:03
*** sonuk has joined #openstack-dns03:07
*** khushbu has joined #openstack-dns03:09
*** khushbu has quit IRC03:13
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC03:14
*** khushbu has joined #openstack-dns04:03
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns04:15
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC04:20
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns05:16
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC05:21
*** cuongnv has quit IRC05:28
*** cuongnv has joined #openstack-dns05:32
*** khushbu has quit IRC05:35
*** khushbu has joined #openstack-dns05:36
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns06:17
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC06:22
*** yee379 has quit IRC06:38
*** yee379 has joined #openstack-dns06:39
*** richm has quit IRC06:42
*** cuongnv_ has joined #openstack-dns07:12
*** cuongnv has quit IRC07:14
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns07:18
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC07:23
*** yee379 has quit IRC07:31
*** yee379 has joined #openstack-dns07:31
*** cuongnv has joined #openstack-dns07:48
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-dns07:50
*** cuongnv_ has quit IRC07:50
*** ratoder2 has joined #openstack-dns08:31
*** ratoder2 has quit IRC08:33
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns09:19
*** prazumovsky has joined #openstack-dns09:20
prazumovskyhi all!09:20
prazumovskyCould somebody help me?09:20
prazumovskyI got error on bind9 "out of range", when try create zone09:20
prazumovskyit happens when worker tries to send notification09:21
*** faizy has joined #openstack-dns09:22
prazumovskyfull message is: invalid command from 10.233.102.143#53408: out of range09:24
prazumovskycan you help me, designate community?)09:24
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC09:25
prazumovskyand also mdns get error: connection reset by peer09:50
prazumovskyand also Socket close09:50
prazumovsky*closed09:50
*** cuongnv has quit IRC10:12
*** hoangcx has quit IRC10:16
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns10:21
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC10:26
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC10:33
*** trugnvfet has quit IRC10:46
*** richm has joined #openstack-dns11:12
*** faizy has quit IRC12:12
*** ftpd has joined #openstack-dns12:21
ftpdHi again.12:21
ftpdIs there a possibility to blacklist/whitelist addresses, that users can use in records?12:22
ftpdI want my user to add dns records to floating IP's only, not for internal ones.12:22
ftpdI know it sounds stupid ;-)12:23
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-dns12:24
*** khushbu has quit IRC12:25
carthaca_Hi, have a look here for blacklists: https://docs.openstack.org/developer/designate/howtos/blacklists.html12:28
ftpdIt's about domain names.12:29
ftpdAnd I want it for addresses.12:30
ftpdI don't want to blacklist foo.mydomain.com. I want to blacklist 10.20.30.5 and allow 10.50.50.x only.12:30
kiallftpd: no, there's no method to blacklist the IPs used in e.g. A records12:34
ftpdO, thanks.12:39
*** zhurong has quit IRC12:45
ftpdHmm. And am I understading this correctly: when I make changes in Designate, it uses rndc (TCP 953) to talk to bind9 backend servers and later those servers make zone transfer (TCP 5354) back to the minidns instance, right?12:47
ftpdI'm thinking about firewall rules to be prepared.12:48
*** sgr7 has joined #openstack-dns12:58
*** chlong has joined #openstack-dns13:00
*** faizy has joined #openstack-dns13:01
*** faizy has quit IRC13:20
*** Drankis has joined #openstack-dns13:21
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns13:23
*** khushbu has joined #openstack-dns13:27
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC13:28
*** EricGonczer_ has joined #openstack-dns13:33
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-dns13:35
*** cleong has joined #openstack-dns13:46
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns13:49
mugsieftpd: yes, that is correct14:03
ftpdAnd what with infoblox? What network ports should be opened?14:04
*** prazumovsky has quit IRC14:11
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC14:12
*** zhurong has quit IRC14:16
*** mlavalle has joined #openstack-dns14:17
*** khushbu has quit IRC14:22
*** EricGonc_ has joined #openstack-dns14:26
*** EricGonczer_ has quit IRC14:27
mugsieftpd: eh, let me look14:37
mugsieI think just the API, and 5314:38
ftpdOk, thanks!14:38
*** sonuk has quit IRC14:40
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns14:55
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC14:59
*** tdink has joined #openstack-dns15:01
*** pcaruana has quit IRC15:09
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns15:22
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-dns15:23
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC15:39
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns15:40
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC15:42
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns15:42
*** sgr7 has quit IRC15:52
timsimHey mugsie do you want to respond to the "[openstack-dev] [cross-project][nova][cinder][designate][neutron] Common support-matrix.py" ML thread with your thoughts about that?16:06
timsimherp. scrolls up in email and sees you did16:07
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC16:07
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns16:09
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-dns16:10
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v openstackgerrit16:10
openstackgerritGraham Hayes proposed openstack/designate master: Bump hacking to new required version  https://review.openstack.org/44259616:10
mugsietimsim: I think ^ fixes it16:11
mugsie*think*16:11
mugsieit may cause other, bigger issues16:11
* mugsie curses at f**king eventlet16:11
timsimYeah that was my initial reaction16:11
timsimbleh16:12
*** pcaruana has quit IRC16:26
*** n3q has joined #openstack-dns16:29
n3qhello16:29
mugsieo/16:30
n3qanybody help?16:30
n3qhow to restart whole service of dev-designate?16:30
n3qhow to restart whole services of dev-designate?16:30
mugsien3q: how are you running it?16:30
n3qI just use it in the first time16:31
n3qafter reboot laptop then It's not auto running.16:31
mugsiehow did you start it?16:31
mugsieor install it?16:31
*** Drankis has quit IRC16:32
n3qI am follow instruction document via openstack's website to setup and configure16:33
n3qhttps://docs.openstack.org/developer/designate/devstack.html16:33
mugsien3q: ah, you need to run ./stack.sh again16:33
n3qthis is document which I used to setup.16:33
n3qwhat?16:34
n3qIt will re-install everything16:34
mugsieyes16:34
mugsiedevstack cannot be shut down16:34
n3qfor each time, It take me long time16:34
n3qDo you have any solutions?16:35
mugsieunfortuntaly, devstack is not designed to be shutdown, and restarted16:35
mugsieit is just for development16:35
mugsieso the only solution is ./stack.sh16:35
n3qI remember that It can restart via ./rejoin.sh --- but not found at the moment16:36
n3qperhaps this script isn't mature then they must be leave out of devstack16:37
mugsiethat was removed by the devstack team16:37
n3qyep. thanks so much!16:37
mugsieand rejoin did not work most of the time16:37
mugsieno problem16:37
n3qI will drink coffee for each time to ./stack.sh command. ^.^16:38
mugsie:D16:39
* mugsie decides to have a coffee :)16:39
n3qyep.16:39
n3qwith ubuntu 16.04 the devstack will work stable?16:40
n3qI use ubuntu 16.10 at my home the devstack is working fine.16:40
timsim`Devstack attempts to support Ubuntu 14.04/16.04` https://docs.openstack.org/developer/devstack/#16:41
n3qBut with ubuntu 16.04 the a lot issues during setup and configure designate.16:41
timsimIt seems like every time I use devstack I see a lot of issues, regardless :P16:42
n3qubuntu 16.04 is smoothest --- perhaps, due to myself. ^^16:43
n3qthank you Tim. have a nice day.16:45
*** n3q has left #openstack-dns16:48
*** n3q has joined #openstack-dns17:03
*** n3q has quit IRC17:04
timsimmugsie: welp https://review.openstack.org/#/c/442596/117:28
timsimAt least the functional tests passed17:29
timsimLooks like central isn't responding to anything over rpc, in the unit tests17:33
*** en_austin has joined #openstack-dns17:33
en_austinhi all! Trying to install Designate Ocata from scratch, following this manual https://docs.openstack.org/project-install-guide/dns/ocata/install-ubuntu.html ... but i'm receiving an "timed out waiting for RPC response" error in logs of all daemons (api, central, etc). Is it ok or I have misconfigured something?17:35
en_austin2017-03-07 20:34:28.239 9262 DEBUG oslo.messaging._drivers.impl_rabbit [-] Timed out waiting for RPC response: Timeout while waiting on RPC response - topic: "<unknown>", RPC method: "<unknown>" info: "<unknown>" _raise_timeout /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/oslo_messaging/_drivers/impl_rabbit.py:105417:35
timsimen_austin: Is rabbitmq running?17:38
en_austinsure, some lines above it reports "connected to AMQP ...."17:38
timsimCan you make a paste.openstack.org with the actual errors?17:39
en_austinhttp://paste.openstack.org/show/601805/ , for example.17:40
timsimI mean that doesn't seem good, do things work regardless?17:40
en_austinSeems nope, it raises NoServersConfigured even after designate-manage pool update command.17:41
en_austinLast time I've installed Designate from scratch on Liberty release... and, it seems, _some_ things have changed. :D17:41
timsimWhat is the response to the pool update command?17:42
en_austinhttp://paste.openstack.org/show/601807/17:46
en_austinand POST to v2/zones still responds with HTTP 500 :(17:47
*** abalutoiu has joined #openstack-dns17:55
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC17:59
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns18:04
*** khushbu has joined #openstack-dns18:18
*** khushbu has quit IRC18:18
*** khushbu has joined #openstack-dns18:29
*** khushbu has quit IRC18:33
*** khushbu has joined #openstack-dns18:33
*** khushbu has quit IRC18:34
en_austinAnd there is a "connection_closed_abruptly" warning into the rabbitmq logs. Still cannot understand what I am doing wrong.18:37
*** abalutoiu has quit IRC18:41
*** khushbu has joined #openstack-dns18:44
*** khushbu has quit IRC18:49
openstackgerritGraham Hayes proposed openstack/designate master: Bump hacking to new required version  https://review.openstack.org/44259618:55
mugsieen_austin: is there any logs from the central side?18:55
mugsieit seems to be theo one having issues18:55
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC18:56
en_austinit was not even running, but i've started it now and it logs the same "timed out waiting for rpc response".19:00
en_austinI've tried to modify oslo_messaging/_drivers/impl_rabbit.py in order to let it throw an actual exception caused, and here's what I've got:19:01
en_austinhttp://paste.openstack.org/show/601820/19:02
en_austinNevertheless, telnet 127.0.0.1 5672 works well.19:02
mugsieen_austin: ssl vs non ssl?19:04
en_austinnon-ssl in confi19:04
en_austinWell, i've restarted it with "keystone" auth_strategy and it stopped to throw these errors (but I don't know, will it work at all, since I do not installed Keystone in my designate installation - it works in private network and do not require an authentication)19:07
mugsieen_austin: whta?19:07
en_austin[service:api] has a "auth_strategy" key with "keystone" as default value. I've changed it to "noauth" and starting to receive such strange errors.19:09
en_austinI've returned it back to "keystone" and received HTTP 401, but w/o AMQ errors.19:09
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns19:13
*** _ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns19:14
*** en_austin has quit IRC19:15
*** shewless has joined #openstack-dns19:16
shewlessHi. I have designate installed and I've had a lot of success with it thanks to all of your help in the past.19:16
shewlessI have another query19:16
shewlessin my pool.yml file there is a targets: masters: section19:17
shewlessI have added my degnate-mdns server as a master19:17
shewlessbut the trouble is that I'm sending updates to a "master" bind server19:17
shewlessand in turn that server is setup to push updates to 2 slaves19:18
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC19:18
*** _ducttape_ has quit IRC19:18
shewlessThe problem is that, since the records I'm pushing to the master identify my designate server as the master (instead of identifying the bind server as the master) the slaves will not accept the update19:18
timsimshewless: So having a tiered bind setup like that isn't strictly supported in Designate19:44
timsimYou can certainly do it, but you're going to need some glue somewhere that's outside of Designate, probably.19:45
shewlesstimsim: can you tell me what the "--masters" option is for when I do "openstack zone create"?19:47
timsimThat's something related to secondary zones, completely different than this situation https://docs.openstack.org/developer/designate/howtos/secondary-zones.html19:47
shewlesstimsim: ah okay thanks19:47
timsimYou could run the Designate agent on that master, and use the agent backend, and that will create your zones on the master as type master, and write zonefiles.19:48
timsimBut the you've got to figure a way to get them created/deleted on the slaves.19:48
shewlesstimsim: so ideally we want our master bind server to handle the DNS zone / record propogation to slaves19:48
shewlessand it sort of does this now19:48
shewlessbut since the "master" of the zone created by designate doesn't match the "master bind server" it's not authoritative and doesn't work19:49
timsimRight. Well you could change the masters of those slave "targets" in pools.yaml.19:49
timsimmasters -> your master bind server19:49
shewlesstimsim: I was thinkgin about that.. but wasn't sure because the comments in the pool file say it's my mdns server19:50
timsimBut, if they get created on the slave before the master the transfer will fail.19:50
shewlesswasn't sure if that would have adverse effect19:50
timsimWell it _should_ be your mdns server, that's how Designate is designed.19:50
timsimBut there are situations where you might not want it to be.19:50
shewlessInteresting19:50
timsimThere's going to be occasional/constant propagation issues, I'd think.19:51
shewlesstimsim: there isn't really a case where it would get created on the slave before the master19:51
shewlessthat I can think of19:51
timsimWell Designate has to create the zone right?19:51
shewlesstimsim: yes designate will create the zone and update the "master bind server"19:52
shewlessthe rest will just work I think?19:52
timsimWhat creates the zone on the slave?19:52
timsimSomething has to19:52
shewlessthe master bind server does19:53
timsimI don't believe it does.19:53
shewlessit's already trying to but since the "master" is the mds server the slave is not allowing it19:53
timsimCan I see your pools.yaml file?19:53
shewlesstimsim: let me try to flip the master and see what happens. I think my sys admin guys have bind setup in a weird way19:54
shewlesstimsim: yes I will share19:54
timsimBind doesn't automatically create/delete servers on a slave, in my experience.19:54
timsimWe've always had to have somethign do that.19:54
shewlesshttp://paste.ubuntu.com/24132542/19:55
shewless.0.13 is bind master19:55
shewless.210.111 is designate19:56
mugsieshewless: *maybe* adding the bind master to that list might work. but the slave will still try on occasion to talk to mini-dns19:57
timsimI don't see how the zones will ever get created on the slave19:57
timsimslave bind servers, I should clarify19:58
timsimThat yaml should get the thing created on the bind master as a "type slave" zone with mdns as the master.19:59
shewlesstimsim: can I make the yaml create a zone with "type master" instead?20:00
mugsieshewless: no20:00
mugsiewe transfer the records as a XFR20:00
mugsieso, it has to be type slave, for the bind server to pull from designate20:00
mugsiewhy do you have the extra layer?20:01
timsimmugsie: looks like your ps2 is going to pass, except for this api-ref error http://logs.openstack.org/96/442596/2/check/gate-designate-api-ref/5bcb621/console.html#_2017-03-07_19_03_33_01934820:01
shewlesstimsim, mugsie: Okay. I tried changing the "master" in yaml to by my master bind server instead of the mdns server. But the zone created was still "type slave" zone with mdns as the master20:01
timsimshewless: Yeah, it's always going to be.20:01
mugsieit should have changed IP address20:02
shewlessit doesn't seem to have changed20:02
mugsiedid you restart pool manager / worker?20:02
mugsiepool manager caches it afaik20:02
mugsietimsim: damn it20:02
mugsiewill fix that noiw20:02
timsimand run the pool update command20:02
mugsieoh, ^^^^^20:02
mugsiethat needs to be highlighted better20:03
timsimrun the pool update, then restart20:04
*** castlemilk has quit IRC20:05
timsimmugsie: What do we need to do to get designate-tempest-plugin docs on docs.openstack.org/20:06
*** castlemilk has joined #openstack-dns20:06
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns20:07
mugsiemerge a patch that makes a docs change20:08
mugsieI did path then jobs20:08
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC20:08
mugsiewhich is wrong20:08
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns20:08
*** castlemilk has quit IRC20:11
* timsim does that right quick20:14
openstackgerritTim Simmons proposed openstack/designate-tempest-plugin master: Fix doc typos  https://review.openstack.org/44276520:16
shewlessmugsie, timsim, I'll try restarting the pool manager/worker. I hadn't done that. I just did the pool update20:19
timsim(only one of pool mgr/worker should be running btw, preferably worker)20:19
timsimPretty sure one of them won't start.20:20
shewlessI have designate-agent, designate-pool-manager, designate-central, designate-mdns, designate-api20:21
shewlessso I restart poo-manager?20:25
timsimSure20:25
shewless..and that is what we call a freudian slip :)20:25
mugsieshewless: it is honestly not even the worst one on this channel20:26
timsimheh20:26
* mugsie had a cracking one a while back20:27
shewlessyou know it's been a long couple of days.. I'm sitting in my chair laughing hysterically right now.. .poo-manager..20:27
*** castlemilk has joined #openstack-dns20:29
shewlessat any rate. I'm trying now iwth the master set to my bind server. I restarted all designate servers and updated my pool20:30
shewlessso far my zone creation says "PENDING" which isn't a great sign20:30
timsimYeah Designate is going to try and create the zone in bind, and bind is going to set the master to itself.20:31
timsimThat's not gonna work.20:31
shewlesstimsim: darn20:32
timsimOr, rather, Designate is going to create the zone of type slave, with the master being the bind server itself.20:32
shewlessshould I just have designate update the master and the slaves via RNDC? Is that possible?20:32
timsimYou _could_ do set the bind master's masters -> designate, and the slaves to be the bind master.20:33
timsimBut then you'll have a situation where if the create lands on the slaves first, the initial transfer will fail. It'll probably retry, but maybe not.20:33
timsimPerhaps if you set also notifies in your bind config, that will solve that problem.20:34
shewlesswhere do I set the slaves?20:35
shewlessin the targets section of the pool file?20:35
timsimYep20:36
timsimThat's pretty ugly, I bet it'll fail somehow.20:36
shewlesstimsim: I didn't know that was an option. Is there a template file that shows all available options?20:37
timsimIt's just yaml, so you can have as many targets as you'd like20:37
shewlesstimsim: can I list two masters?20:37
timsimsame with nameservers, pools, etc.20:37
timsimsure20:37
shewlessor is taht what you meant?20:37
shewlesslike. is "slaves" a keyword allowed in teh targets section/20:37
timsimno20:37
shewlessah.. so you meant add two masters20:38
timsimSo you'd need one target per dns server that Designate needs to create the zone on.20:38
timsimSo three for you.20:38
timsimThen in the masters section of the "slave" servers, you'd set it to the Bind master.20:38
timsimSo that when designate creates teh zones, they are like "type slave; masters { bind9 master ip} ;"20:38
timsimBut I really don't think that's going to work well20:39
timsimI think what you really want is something like this http://jpmens.net/2013/02/13/automatic-provisioning-of-slave-dns-servers/20:39
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC20:40
shewlesstimsim: thanks. reading up now. what a weird problem.20:43
timsimYeah. It's kind of annoying.20:43
timsimYeah, we ran tiered bind, and had crappy custom daemons to handle that replication.20:44
shewlesstimsim: I think if I add 3 targets in the pool file it may work. but how much load is this going to add to the designate server?20:49
timsimIt should be ok20:49
shewlesstimsim: so I added another target. I actually set the master to my mdns server for both targets. The master bind server just won't notify the slaves for these dynamic zones20:59
shewlessit seems to work... but when I do a recordset list I see that all the records are in status PENDING.. not sure why21:00
timsimYeah so what you're doing now is just having three bind slaves21:01
shewlessbut If I check the "master bind" and the "slave bind" they definintly got the zone/records created that I need21:01
timsimslaving off of designate21:01
shewlesstimsim: for now that should work for me21:01
shewlessbut I don't get why the status is PENDING for all of my records.. any way to debug that?21:01
timsimDesignate assigns a status, once it sees that the records are active on the "nameservers" in your pools yaml, it'll change them to active.21:02
timsimI think you should see some of the logs of that polling in the mdns log, maybe the pool mgr log for state changes.21:02
shewlesstimsim: so if I have two targets should I add two nameservers to my pools file?21:02
timsimProbably.21:03
timsimShouldn't you have three?21:03
timsimBecause you have three servers21:03
shewlessyes. fair. I just tried adding 1 slave for now but once it's working I'll add the other and I will ahve a total of 321:03
*** castlemilk has quit IRC21:04
shewlesstimsim: it's weird though.. if I only have 1 nameserver listed I'd think it'd just check that and be done with it21:06
shewlessthe nameserver I have listed definitly got the record21:06
timsimYeah, it probably is.21:06
timsimIt's actually checking the SOA record for the updated serial number.21:06
shewlesshmm.. wierd.. I added the other nameserver and now it's working21:07
shewlessdunno if it was a timing thing or what.. but it works so that's good21:07
timsimof course pbr http://logs.openstack.org/65/442765/1/check/gate-designate-tempest-plugin-pep8-ubuntu-xenial/5bafef6/console.html21:08
* timsim gets it21:08
shewlesstimsim, mugsie: thanks for the help. It seems to be working by having my 3 bind servers slave off of designate21:11
shewlesstimsim, mugsie: I'm noticing that designate is not informing bind of a change in the IP address. Is that normal?21:13
shewlesswould I use the "also notify" section for that in the pool yaml?21:14
shewlessoops.. nevermind21:14
openstackgerritTim Simmons proposed openstack/designate-tempest-plugin master: Fix doc typos and hacking requirement  https://review.openstack.org/44276521:14
shewlessthe bind servers seem to be updated.. but my ping doesn't work21:14
shewlessdoes ubuntu have a DNS cache?21:15
shewlessping of my dns name resolves to an old address, but nslookup against all 3 of my bind servers resolves to the correct address. weird21:16
*** castlemilk has joined #openstack-dns21:18
timsimIs there something in /etc/hosts?21:20
timsimOr maybe dnsmasq or something21:20
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns21:40
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC21:46
*** abalutoiu has joined #openstack-dns21:51
*** cleong has quit IRC21:55
openstackgerritGraham Hayes proposed openstack/designate master: Bump hacking to new required version  https://review.openstack.org/44259621:56
mugsietimsim: ^^21:56
timsimlol. Maybe not an auto +2 on that one.21:57
mugsiewell, it can't merge if it fails :P21:58
timsimI suppose.21:58
timsimI'm a bit concerned there might be a massive performance regression.21:58
timsimBut it's probably fine.21:58
mugsie:/22:02
mugsieyeah22:02
*** tdink has quit IRC22:08
mugsietimsim: I am heading out - if that passes, can you +A+2 it?22:12
* mugsie just looked at a clock22:12
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns22:16
timsimSure, have a good night mugsie22:22
timsimand if you'd like, +A this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/442765/ plz22:23
* mugsie - http://replygif.net/i/712.gif22:25
timsim<322:27
*** tdink has joined #openstack-dns22:33
*** catintheroof has quit IRC22:41
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-dns22:42
*** catintheroof has quit IRC22:47
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC23:04
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns23:07
*** Guest45345 has joined #openstack-dns23:08
openstackgerritMerged openstack/designate-tempest-plugin master: Fix doc typos and hacking requirement  https://review.openstack.org/44276523:14
*** kiall has quit IRC23:18
*** kiall has joined #openstack-dns23:19
*** kiall is now known as Guest4106923:19
*** Guest45345 has quit IRC23:22
*** EricGonc_ has quit IRC23:31
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-dns23:32
*** ducttape_ has quit IRC23:55
*** ducttape_ has joined #openstack-dns23:56

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!