Wednesday, 2012-08-15

*** zhuadl_ has joined #openstack-dev00:07
*** nati_ue__ has joined #openstack-dev00:08
*** Tushar has joined #openstack-dev00:10
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC00:12
*** johnpostlethwait has quit IRC00:14
TusharCore reviewers, please review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/11016/. I think it is good to have this new notification driver (HTTP notifier) in Folsom. Thanks00:15
mikaljaypipes: ping?00:20
*** AlanClark has quit IRC00:22
*** gongys has joined #openstack-dev00:24
*** andrewbogott is now known as andrewbogott_afk00:28
*** samkottler|run is now known as samkottler00:32
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-dev00:32
*** roge has joined #openstack-dev00:35
*** jtran has quit IRC00:36
*** matwood has quit IRC00:36
*** s0mik has quit IRC00:38
*** maoy has joined #openstack-dev00:42
maoymtaylor: ping00:43
*** vladimir3p has quit IRC00:43
*** littleidea has quit IRC00:45
*** maoy has quit IRC00:46
*** maoy has joined #openstack-dev00:47
*** Tushar has left #openstack-dev00:48
clarkbglance reviewers: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/11378/00:51
*** zaitcev has quit IRC00:51
*** adjohn has quit IRC00:52
*** zul has quit IRC00:56
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-dev00:59
*** nati_ue__ has quit IRC01:02
*** cloudvirt has joined #openstack-dev01:04
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC01:04
*** zul has joined #openstack-dev01:06
*** rods has quit IRC01:07
rmkvishy: block storage fixes for folsom - https://review.openstack.org/1137501:11
vishyrmk: you missed the bare metal driver, but I think as i mentioned in the review best to delay about a week on this one01:15
vishyjust so the new drivers can be modified too.01:15
rmkok np -- bare metal driver only takes 2 args for reboot right now01:15
rmki looked at it and concluded theres no way it works right now :)01:15
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-dev01:22
*** matwood has joined #openstack-dev01:22
*** kpavel has quit IRC01:22
*** flaviamissi has quit IRC01:24
*** cloudvirt has quit IRC01:29
*** zhuadl_ has quit IRC01:31
*** blamar has quit IRC01:32
*** samkottler is now known as samkottler|afk01:35
*** ncode has joined #openstack-dev01:35
*** tongli has quit IRC01:35
*** zul has quit IRC01:38
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC01:44
*** danwent has quit IRC01:50
*** arosen has quit IRC01:52
*** zul has joined #openstack-dev01:53
*** tgall_foo has quit IRC01:56
*** zhuadl has joined #openstack-dev02:00
mesteryprimeministerp: pong02:02
*** samkottler|afk is now known as samkottler02:04
*** hisaharu has joined #openstack-dev02:07
*** spiffxp has quit IRC02:07
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC02:08
*** spiffxp has joined #openstack-dev02:09
*** arosen has joined #openstack-dev02:10
*** anniec has quit IRC02:11
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-dev02:13
*** renier has quit IRC02:16
*** adalbas has quit IRC02:17
*** renier has joined #openstack-dev02:19
*** tgall_foo has joined #openstack-dev02:21
*** tgall_foo has quit IRC02:21
*** tgall_foo has joined #openstack-dev02:21
*** renier_ has joined #openstack-dev02:23
*** renier has quit IRC02:23
*** maoy has quit IRC02:25
*** mjfork has quit IRC02:26
*** danwent has joined #openstack-dev02:26
*** s0mik has joined #openstack-dev02:26
*** spiffxp has quit IRC02:32
*** ayoung is now known as ayoung-zzzz02:34
*** gongys has quit IRC02:34
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-dev02:43
*** nati_uen_ has quit IRC02:43
*** danwent has quit IRC02:48
*** mnewby has quit IRC02:48
*** sunxin has joined #openstack-dev02:50
*** spiffxp has joined #openstack-dev02:52
*** Mandell has quit IRC02:55
*** zhuadl__ has joined #openstack-dev03:00
*** samkottler is now known as samkottler|afk03:01
*** zhuadl has quit IRC03:03
*** zhuadl__ is now known as zhuadl03:04
*** roge has quit IRC03:22
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC03:24
*** yuanz has quit IRC03:29
*** mikal has quit IRC03:31
*** spiffxp has quit IRC03:31
*** mikal has joined #openstack-dev03:33
*** Garen has joined #openstack-dev03:44
*** mikal has quit IRC03:44
*** zhuadl has quit IRC03:45
*** mikal has joined #openstack-dev03:46
*** hemna_ has quit IRC03:48
*** littleidea has quit IRC03:50
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-dev03:51
*** vanchester has joined #openstack-dev03:53
*** issackel_ has quit IRC03:56
*** tgall_foo has quit IRC03:57
*** amotoki has joined #openstack-dev04:01
*** hemna_ has joined #openstack-dev04:04
*** s0mik has quit IRC04:05
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-dev04:07
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC04:10
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-dev04:10
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-dev04:13
*** spiffxp has joined #openstack-dev04:20
*** ewindisch has quit IRC04:21
*** mikal has quit IRC04:24
*** tserong has quit IRC04:27
*** tserong has joined #openstack-dev04:28
*** tserong has joined #openstack-dev04:28
*** mikal has joined #openstack-dev04:31
*** inteq has joined #openstack-dev04:31
*** s0mik has joined #openstack-dev04:31
*** mikal_ has joined #openstack-dev04:31
*** inteq has quit IRC04:32
*** mikal has quit IRC04:32
*** mikal_ has quit IRC04:32
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-dev04:32
*** mikal has joined #openstack-dev04:32
*** anniec has joined #openstack-dev04:41
*** mnewby has joined #openstack-dev04:51
*** spiffxp has quit IRC04:54
*** darkhorse has joined #openstack-dev04:55
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-dev04:57
*** anniec_ has joined #openstack-dev05:03
*** nati_ueno_2 has joined #openstack-dev05:05
*** nati_ueno_2 has quit IRC05:05
*** rohit404 has joined #openstack-dev05:05
*** nati_ueno_2 has joined #openstack-dev05:05
*** anniec has quit IRC05:07
*** anniec_ is now known as anniec05:07
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC05:08
*** koolhead17 has joined #openstack-dev05:17
*** zhuadl has joined #openstack-dev05:20
*** mikal has quit IRC05:23
*** titankiller has joined #openstack-dev05:23
*** mikal has joined #openstack-dev05:25
rmkNeed one more approval on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/11371/ please, it's a 2 liner05:28
*** AlvinXu has joined #openstack-dev05:28
*** garyk has joined #openstack-dev05:30
*** s0mik has quit IRC05:31
*** danwent has joined #openstack-dev05:32
*** hisaharu has quit IRC05:39
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-dev05:53
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-dev05:53
*** nati_ueno_2 has quit IRC05:57
*** hattwick has quit IRC06:01
*** s0mik has joined #openstack-dev06:07
*** markmcclain has quit IRC06:14
*** milner has quit IRC06:17
*** almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan06:22
*** al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away06:22
*** johnpur has quit IRC06:23
rohit404garyk: ping06:26
*** steveb_ has quit IRC06:27
*** milner has joined #openstack-dev06:30
*** erikzaadi has joined #openstack-dev06:39
*** eglynn__ has joined #openstack-dev06:41
*** nati_ueno_2 has joined #openstack-dev06:42
*** maploin has joined #openstack-dev06:43
*** maploin has quit IRC06:43
*** maploin has joined #openstack-dev06:43
*** nati_ueno_2 has quit IRC06:43
*** nati_ueno_2 has joined #openstack-dev06:43
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC06:45
*** s0mik has quit IRC06:53
*** danwent has quit IRC06:55
garykrohit404: hi06:57
rohit404garyk: hey ! i wanted to follow up on the review request...i'm around incase if you had other open comments06:59
garykrohit404: ok. i am going to start the second round in a few minutes.07:00
rohit404garyk: sounds good..thanks !07:00
garykrohit404: is the 404 an http code. if so i need to define garyk305 :)07:01
*** AlvinXu has quit IRC07:03
rohit404garyk: yes ! 305 would be an interesting one07:05
*** reidrac has joined #openstack-dev07:06
*** dolphm has quit IRC07:07
rohit404garyk: if you dont mind me asking, what part of the globe are you located in ?07:10
garykrohit404: i am in the middle east. israel. hot as hell here!07:11
garykrohit404: you?07:11
rohit404garyk: ah cool..not the heat though....i'm in india at the moment and getting back to bayarea soon07:12
garykrohit404: cool.07:13
*** smokes2345 has quit IRC07:18
*** milner has quit IRC07:27
*** markmc has joined #openstack-dev07:31
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-dev07:32
*** nati_ueno_2 has quit IRC07:35
*** adjohn has quit IRC07:36
asalkeldsay markmc can we knock off this service review?07:38
markmcasalkeld, I know, I'm being a slacker07:38
markmcasalkeld, we're trying to clear out a bunch of nova reviews before cutting folsom-307:38
markmcasalkeld, thinking this stuff is grizzly material, what do you think?07:39
markmcasalkeld, i.e. this late in folsom doesn't seem like the right time to be converting glance and nova to it07:39
*** kbringard has joined #openstack-dev07:39
*** kbringard has left #openstack-dev07:40
*** milner has joined #openstack-dev07:40
asalkeldI am all for now07:41
asalkeldmarkmc, at least for common07:41
asalkeldthen we can use it in heat/ceilometer07:41
markmcasalkeld, I'll be branching common for folsom too07:41
markmcasalkeld, i.e. we won't want new features in the folsom branch of common07:42
*** sulochan has joined #openstack-dev07:42
*** mnewby has quit IRC07:42
markmcasalkeld, because it makes it hard for projects to sync just fixes across07:42
asalkeldthe question is well we change it later07:42
markmcchange what later?07:42
asalkeldif it's going to be the same then no point waiting07:42
asalkeld(the code)07:42
asalkeldIMO07:43
markmcwhy would we not change it later?07:43
markmcyou mean change the API later?07:43
asalkeldwhat I mean is if the patch series is going to be the same07:44
asalkeldnow or later07:44
markmcI don't know, I haven't reviewed it closely yet07:44
*** koolhead17 has quit IRC07:44
asalkeldyikes hope I haven't waisted 2 weeks of my life :(07:45
markmcif it goes into common for folsom, that will mean this stuff will be bugfix-only on the folsom branch07:45
markmcasalkeld, dude07:45
asalkeldjust saying07:45
markmcasalkeld, this stuff is totally going into common07:45
markmcasalkeld, but it's being reviewed07:46
markmcasalkeld, so, of course it might change a bit before being merged07:46
asalkeldok, well have a think and let me know07:46
markmcI'm thinking we should branch common for folsom this week07:47
markmcand merge it soon into master07:47
asalkeldok, I am fine with that07:47
markmccool, thanks07:47
markmcyou know, I suspect there's a bunch of work to clean up these APIs07:48
markmcbefore it goes from incubation into a library release07:48
asalkeldsure07:48
markmcI guess I was hoping to get some of that out of the way now07:48
markmcto have a quicker path07:48
markmcsounds like you're impatient to get it merged, though?07:48
asalkeldnot used to slow review turn around I guess07:49
markmce.g. the rpc stuff got merged quickly07:49
*** matwood has quit IRC07:49
markmcbut now https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-common/+spec/rpc-api-review is going to take a while to get sorted07:49
markmcso, we can do it either way, I guess07:49
asalkeldyea07:50
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-dev07:51
*** kpavel has joined #openstack-dev07:58
garykrohit404: i am done.07:59
*** dave_mcn_away is now known as dave_mcn07:59
*** derekh has joined #openstack-dev08:05
rohit404garyk: grand ! thanks for review again...do you plan to attend the folsom summit in-person..would be great to meet08:06
*** almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan08:10
*** darraghb has joined #openstack-dev08:11
garykrohit404: yes, i hope to attend. if so it will be great to meet you08:11
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-dev08:11
*** anniec has quit IRC08:12
*** EmilienM has left #openstack-dev08:17
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-dev08:18
*** EmilienM has joined #openstack-dev08:19
*** nati_ueno_2 has joined #openstack-dev08:20
nati_ueno_2rkukura: Hi Bob. Now extension parameter looks not returned by API. Do you know anything?08:20
*** dolphm has quit IRC08:22
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC08:23
rohit404garyk: cool..now a stable tested quantum release stand between now and then :)08:23
*** nati_ueno_2 has quit IRC08:23
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-dev08:24
*** Blake_Yeager has quit IRC08:24
*** hattwick has joined #openstack-dev08:43
*** mestery has quit IRC08:46
*** vanchester has quit IRC08:46
*** mestery has joined #openstack-dev08:46
*** kpavel has quit IRC08:47
*** sunxin has quit IRC08:48
*** dachary has quit IRC08:54
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC08:57
*** andrea_ has quit IRC08:58
*** sunxin has joined #openstack-dev08:58
*** andrea_ has joined #openstack-dev08:58
*** vanchester has joined #openstack-dev08:58
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-dev09:00
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC09:00
*** danpb has joined #openstack-dev09:00
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-dev09:00
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC09:08
*** mestery has quit IRC09:09
*** kpavel has joined #openstack-dev09:10
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-dev09:16
*** dachary has joined #openstack-dev09:18
*** mestery has joined #openstack-dev09:25
*** sunxin has quit IRC09:38
*** kpavel has quit IRC09:40
*** mestery has quit IRC09:44
*** mestery has joined #openstack-dev09:45
*** Rajesh has joined #openstack-dev09:47
*** Rajesh is now known as Guest9905809:47
*** reed has quit IRC09:50
*** maploin` has joined #openstack-dev09:52
*** maploin` has quit IRC09:54
*** maploin` has joined #openstack-dev09:54
*** maploin has quit IRC09:55
*** reed has joined #openstack-dev10:02
*** kyriakos has joined #openstack-dev10:03
*** Guest99058 is now known as Rajesh_10:04
*** sulochan has left #openstack-dev10:17
*** sulochan has joined #openstack-dev10:18
*** sulochan has left #openstack-dev10:18
*** _zing has joined #openstack-dev10:19
*** _zing has quit IRC10:20
*** zing has joined #openstack-dev10:21
*** Dharmit has joined #openstack-dev10:22
*** zhuadl has quit IRC10:29
chmoueljgriffith: just catching up a couple of hours laters with your ping :)10:50
garyksalv-orlando: ping10:59
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-dev11:21
*** rods has joined #openstack-dev11:22
*** ncode has quit IRC11:25
*** Rajesh_ has quit IRC11:44
garykPotHix: ping11:51
*** cloudvirt has joined #openstack-dev11:55
*** salgado has quit IRC11:58
*** salgado has joined #openstack-dev11:58
*** maurosr has joined #openstack-dev11:58
*** adalbas has joined #openstack-dev12:02
*** cloudvirt has quit IRC12:03
*** ywu has joined #openstack-dev12:13
*** cloudvirt has joined #openstack-dev12:18
*** reed has quit IRC12:22
*** ywu has quit IRC12:23
garykPotHix:12:28
*** rods has quit IRC12:33
*** cloudvirt has quit IRC12:33
*** rods has joined #openstack-dev12:33
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-dev12:35
*** roge has joined #openstack-dev12:38
*** lts has joined #openstack-dev12:40
*** gargya has joined #openstack-dev12:43
*** AlanClark has quit IRC12:46
*** cloudvirt has joined #openstack-dev12:47
*** vanchester has quit IRC12:49
markmcvuntz, hey12:50
*** dolphm has quit IRC12:51
primeministerpexit12:53
*** primeministerp has quit IRC12:53
*** primeministerp has joined #openstack-dev12:53
*** jaypipes has quit IRC12:54
*** samkottler|afk is now known as samkottler12:59
garykPotHix: you there?13:02
*** kbringard has joined #openstack-dev13:03
*** inteq has joined #openstack-dev13:06
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-dev13:12
*** flaviamissi has joined #openstack-dev13:12
*** gongys has joined #openstack-dev13:16
*** vanchester has joined #openstack-dev13:18
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-dev13:19
*** sandywalsh_ has joined #openstack-dev13:20
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC13:21
*** zhuadl has joined #openstack-dev13:22
*** vanchester has quit IRC13:23
*** vanchester has joined #openstack-dev13:24
*** tgall_foo has joined #openstack-dev13:25
*** tgall_foo has quit IRC13:25
*** tgall_foo has joined #openstack-dev13:25
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-dev13:28
*** dprince has joined #openstack-dev13:28
*** tgall_foo has quit IRC13:29
*** cloudvirt has quit IRC13:38
ttxbcwaldon: all clear for cutting milestone-proposed on Glance ? Or is there anything you'd like to merge before I do ?13:38
bcwaldonttx: all clear13:39
ttxbcwaldon++13:39
*** al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away13:40
*** sstent has quit IRC13:45
*** tgall_foo has joined #openstack-dev13:46
*** tgall_foo has quit IRC13:46
*** tgall_foo has joined #openstack-dev13:46
*** cloudvirt has joined #openstack-dev13:47
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC13:52
*** erikzaadi has quit IRC14:01
*** ayoung-zzzz is now known as ayoung14:06
*** sstent has joined #openstack-dev14:07
*** ayoung has quit IRC14:07
*** avishay has joined #openstack-dev14:09
*** moula has joined #openstack-dev14:09
*** rafaduran has joined #openstack-dev14:10
avishayvishy: any update with the XIV volume driver?14:11
*** epic2005 has joined #openstack-dev14:11
*** Mandell has quit IRC14:13
salv-orlandogaryk: are you around?14:14
ttxjgriffith: ping14:14
garyksalv-orlando: yes. how are you?14:14
salv-orlandofeel like a zombie, but  fond of my teenage years, when I did not sleep on the night before Aug 15th14:15
salv-orlandobut at those times it was because I was partying all night14:15
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-dev14:15
salv-orlandoanyway, do you have enough time (and strength) to re-review the patch for OVS provider networks today?14:16
salv-orlandoI saw he just submitted another patch. It would be great if we could get it in before tomorrow morning (our morning)14:17
*** andrewbogott_afk is now known as andrewbogott14:17
zulanyone seen this before? http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/1148845/14:17
garyksalv-orlando: sure no problem.14:18
rkukurasalv-orlando, garyk: the agent isn't ready yet, but the rest is ready to review14:19
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-dev14:19
*** andrewbogott is now known as andrewbogott_afk14:19
*** andrewbogott_afk is now known as andrewbogott14:19
salv-orlandorkukura: oh, I missed the ovs_quantum_agent diff was just +2,-114:20
salv-orlandorkukura: do you think we should apply for FFe for this feature? It's a reasonable candidate for having a FFe granted I believe.14:20
rkukurasalv-orlando: I agree if it doesn't get in today in some form. It may be possible to have the agent working for tunnels today, but vlans and flat networks aren't likely today14:21
*** moula has quit IRC14:22
*** rnirmal has joined #openstack-dev14:22
*** TheRealBill has joined #openstack-dev14:23
salv-orlandook. So the choice seems between FFe for all agent-related work or FFe for provider networks on vans and flat networks. Is that right?14:23
ttxbcwaldon: milestone-proposed cut for Glance F314:25
rkukurasalv-orlando: if what we have right now is merged, the agent won't run at all. One option is to get tunnels working and then merge, leaving vlans (provider and normal) and flat provider netoworks broken to be fixed as a bug.14:25
*** dspano has joined #openstack-dev14:27
salv-orlandorkukura: thanks for the clarification. Let's go with this plan.14:27
*** Rajesh has joined #openstack-dev14:28
bcwaldonttx: thank you, sir14:28
*** Rajesh is now known as Guest8622914:28
*** andreaf has quit IRC14:29
*** titankiller2 has joined #openstack-dev14:32
*** titankiller has quit IRC14:33
andrewbogottgrrr, devstack won't start because it doesn't like the version of prettytable I have installed, and I can't convince pip to downgrade me.14:35
andrewbogottCan anyone advise?  "error: Installed distribution prettytable 0.6.1 conflicts with requirement prettytable==0.6"14:35
*** matwood has joined #openstack-dev14:38
*** maoy has joined #openstack-dev14:39
*** Mandell has quit IRC14:39
*** rbasak has quit IRC14:39
*** Guest86229 has quit IRC14:40
garykPotHix: ping14:41
vishyavishay: we are going to sync code from cinder -> nova-volume after feature freeze so no rush14:42
*** rbasak has joined #openstack-dev14:43
*** Dharmit has quit IRC14:44
*** Rajesh has joined #openstack-dev14:53
*** Rajesh is now known as Guest3551914:54
*** blamar has joined #openstack-dev14:55
*** mestery_ has joined #openstack-dev14:55
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away14:56
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net14:56
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-dev14:57
timellohey vishy, there's an updated patch set on https://review.openstack.org/9666 , I'm wondering if you have any other comment regarding the PowerVM driver. Thank you!14:57
*** titankiller2 has quit IRC14:57
*** Guest35519 has quit IRC14:58
*** mestery has quit IRC14:59
*** datsun180b has joined #openstack-dev15:03
*** Mandell has quit IRC15:03
*** hemna_ has quit IRC15:03
*** TheRealBill has quit IRC15:03
*** Rajesh_ has joined #openstack-dev15:06
*** Rajesh_ has quit IRC15:07
PotHixgaryk: I'm here15:07
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-dev15:07
garykPotHix: did you by any chance get to see Mark's comments.15:07
*** gargya has quit IRC15:08
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC15:08
*** gargya has joined #openstack-dev15:09
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-dev15:09
*** reidrac has quit IRC15:09
PotHixgaryk: I'll read it now.15:10
timellovishy: awesome! Thank you. Who else could we ask for to take a look and give some feedbacks?15:10
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away15:11
garykPotHix: thanks15:12
markmcjeblair, hey, is there any way we can allow *-core folks re-open auto-abandonded reviews?15:14
PotHixgaryk: we have the isc-dhcp code running on Debian. I'm trying it on Ubuntu now and we cannot use the /etc/init.d/isc-dhcp-server =\15:14
PotHixRather than invoking init scripts through /etc/init.d, use the service(8)15:15
zykes-what codes that PotHix ?15:15
*** maploin` is now known as maploin15:15
*** maploin has joined #openstack-dev15:15
*** hub_cap has joined #openstack-dev15:15
PotHixzykes-: isp-dhcp support for quantum15:15
garykPotHix: is this because of the namespaces?15:16
PotHixgaryk: Unfortunately not. I think ubuntu is forcing all projects to not use init.d and use upstart instead15:16
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net15:17
garykPotHix: ok. understood15:17
*** titankiller has joined #openstack-dev15:17
garykPotHix: so you orginally tested the patch with debian?15:17
*** jimfehlig has joined #openstack-dev15:18
zykes-PotHix: ok, will quantum havef support for DNS stuff as well or ?15:18
zykes-or is that left up to nova ?15:18
zykes-PotHix: is that so hard though, to use upstart ?15:19
PotHixgaryk: we are running a branch of quantum for our infra on top of Debian15:19
PotHixzykes-: if we use upstart it will not work on Debian by default.15:19
garykPotHix: ok.15:20
zykes-:p15:20
PotHixgaryk: I was trying devstack on top of Ubuntu, but I really forgot about Ubuntu and upstart.15:21
*** rafaduran has left #openstack-dev15:21
*** anniec has joined #openstack-dev15:21
*** epic2005 has quit IRC15:22
*** nunosantos has joined #openstack-dev15:23
rmkCan I get one more nova review on this please: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/11371/15:28
*** andrewbogott is now known as andrewbogott_afk15:28
*** spiffxp has joined #openstack-dev15:31
sandywalsh_soren: I think your script is busted http://wiki.openstack.org/Nova/ReviewDays15:33
PotHixgaryk: A lot of code to change and tests to do (on Ubuntu). This blueprint is not critical, so I think is a better choice to not ship it for Folsom.15:34
PotHixgaryk: What do you think?15:34
garykPotHix: I suggest that you take this up with salvatore. Please note that we also need to validate with other flavors of linus (Fedora, RHEL etc)15:35
*** mjfork has joined #openstack-dev15:35
garykPotHix: I agree with you.15:36
PotHixgaryk: ok. No problem. This code is already running for us, as we are using our branch, we'll work on it and give the code back later.15:38
garykPotHix: no problem.15:39
*** dachary has quit IRC15:39
PotHixgaryk: Thanks for you help on this anyway :)15:39
garykPotHix: my pleasure. I just think that we should notify salv-orlando so that he can update the blueprint and launchpad accordingly15:40
PotHixgaryk: I'll reply that e-mail :)15:41
garykPotHix: cool15:41
*** littleidea has quit IRC15:42
*** rohit404 has quit IRC15:42
*** gongys has quit IRC15:43
*** s34n_ is now known as s34n15:44
*** jtran has joined #openstack-dev15:44
* salv-orlando is always lurking15:48
*** AlanClark has quit IRC15:49
ttxn0ano: please confirm we should consider https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/trusted-computing-pools implemented15:49
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC15:50
salv-orlandogaryk, PotHix: it does not seem the ISC-dhcp blueprint is a high-priority one. It is medium, which does not make it a good candidate for FFe. So I am ok with leaving it aside for Folsom.15:51
*** ayoung has joined #openstack-dev15:52
*** Rajesh has joined #openstack-dev15:54
*** Rajesh is now known as Guest8749715:55
PotHixsalv-orlando: ok, no problem :). Just replied to the isc-dhcp e-mail with the same idea.15:56
jeblairmarkmc: don't believe so; i think that would be a patch to gerrit.  :/15:57
*** titankiller has quit IRC15:58
markmcjeblair, it's quite a common thing, no that we're auto-abandoning patches15:58
guitarzanis anyone around to talk aout attaching volumes?15:58
guitarzanor is patch dropping acceptable?15:59
markmcjeblair, we see it get abandoned and go "wait, that patch looked ok!" and have to ask the owner to re-open15:59
*** andrewbogott_afk is now known as andrewbogott16:00
*** gargya has quit IRC16:00
*** Guest87497 has quit IRC16:01
jeblairmarkmc: i know; i'm personally not a fan of auto-abandon.  part of the idea of WIP was that -core people would be able to mark others' changes as WIP.16:01
jeblairmarkmc: i wonder if that it enough functionality to replace auto-abandoning16:01
*** dachary has joined #openstack-dev16:01
markmcjeblair, ah, that's new to me16:01
jeblairmarkmc: i'm not sure those acls were actually set16:01
markmcjeblair, how do I mark someone else's patch as WIP?16:02
jeblairmarkmc: that's what i mean -- i'm not sure the acl to allow you to do that was created.  lemme check.16:02
markmcjeblair, ok16:02
markmcjeblair, it seems like a reasonable solution, yeah16:03
*** dave_mcn is now known as dave_mcn_away16:03
jeblairmarkmc: okay, i just gave nova-core WIP perms on nova16:03
*** anniec has quit IRC16:03
garyksalv-orlando: sounds reasonable. thanks16:03
markmcjeblair, cool, see it now - and the owner can unset WIP?16:04
jeblairmarkmc: yep16:04
markmcjeblair, ok, next up - make 'git review list' not show WIP patches :)16:04
jeblairmarkmc: yes, good idea16:04
markmcjeblair, do they show up in the normal 'status:open' query in the web UI ?16:04
rmkmarkmc: Can you take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/11387/ -- its on its way into the folsom branch but I have a backport for essex also16:05
jeblairmarkmc: they do show up in open, but not the dashboard view16:05
jeblairmarkmc: there's a predicate for it, so you can filter them out16:05
markmcjeblair, hmm, what people want with auto-abandon is for it to disappear from view basically16:05
markmcjeblair, e.g. we keep track of how many open reviews there are in nova and auto-abandon drops that number16:06
jeblairmarkmc: yes -- it disappears from dashboard views.  there was some disagreement whether it should show be included in open.16:06
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-dev16:07
jeblairmarkmc: i argued that it should be in open -- because it _is_ an open review, and i didn't think it should be (nearly?) impossible to see what people are working on16:07
jeblairmarkmc: but i also admit the other side of that argument is very compelling.16:07
jeblairmarkmc: it's possible that's the wrong decision and we should change it.16:08
jeblairmarkmc: but we had to pick on or the other to start.  :)16:08
garyksalv-orlando: i am heading home. i'll be online a bit later when the kids are alseep, try not to party like it was 1984 :)16:08
markmcjeblair, I don't think the dashboard is where core reviewers go looking for stuff to review16:08
*** zhuadl has quit IRC16:08
markmcjeblair, and what they want is for the place they do go looking to not be overwhelming16:08
markmcjeblair, that's why we loved auto-abandon, for a while :)16:08
jeblairmarkmc: that's sad.  we wrote https://review.openstack.org/#/mine/important/ essentially based on all the feedback we got.16:08
jeblairmarkmc: what's missing from that to make it useful?16:09
markmcjeblair, ok, maybe I'm wrong16:09
markmcjeblair, I don't use it :)16:10
jeblairmarkmc: i use the "reviewable by" section of that almost exclusively now.16:10
markmcjeblair, and I've got lots of projects mixed up in there16:10
vishyjeblair: can we switch auto-abandon to auto-wip?16:10
vishyand allow core to un-wip things?16:10
jeblairvishy: absolutely.16:10
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away16:11
jeblairvishy, markmc: and if people feel that wip should not show up in open, we can change that.  it would probably be best to get some feedback from more people on that.16:12
*** garyk has quit IRC16:12
*** hub_cap is now known as hub_cap_afk16:12
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-dev16:13
jeblairvishy, markmc: i'll run the "grant wip to core" and "auto-wip instead of auto-abandon" changes by the rest of the infra team -- as long as no one sees any problems with them, they should be easy to implement.16:14
*** maploin has quit IRC16:14
markmcjeblair, cool16:14
mtaylorjeblair: I agree with those changes16:14
mtaylorjeblair: of course, you know I'd like for WIP to show up in less places :) ... but16:15
mtaylorjeblair: also markmc should probably check out the important page for a bit before we change things16:15
mtayloron that count16:15
markmcmtaylor, I just took a quick look and I've a tonne of stuff there16:16
mtaylormarkmc: so, feedback about what would make that more useful, if anything, is highly welcome16:16
markmcthis is first in my list: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/7517/16:16
* markmc has no idea why16:16
*** jdurgin has joined #openstack-dev16:16
mtaylormarkmc: I believe that list is sorted by "oldest things you haven't reviewed"16:17
mtaylorjeblair: oh, you know what we might be missing?16:17
markmcmtaylor, I don't review cinder patches, generally :)16:17
*** uvg_ has joined #openstack-dev16:18
mtaylormarkmc: do yo have a watch for it? cause that's weird16:18
markmcmtaylor, probably, yeah16:18
mtaylorjeblair: change comes in, it's one of mark's projects, it goes in his queue, so he should review it16:18
mtaylorjeblair: BUT - he doesn't feel he can review that patch...16:18
*** cloudvirt has quit IRC16:19
*** arosen has quit IRC16:19
markmcmtaylor, I'd need something per-project, I think - switching focus between projects16:19
mtaylorjeblair: there should be a way for him to acknowledge that he had seen it, but decline to review it16:19
mtaylormarkmc: or that16:20
markmcmtaylor, right now I use 'git review list' and a goofy tagging patch16:20
mtaylormarkmc: ah16:20
markmcmtaylor, e.g. I tag reviews as "needswork" or "todo" or whatever16:20
markmcmtaylor, still playing with the idea16:20
jeblairmtaylor: yes, i have wished for that, but i don't think there's a facility that already exists in gerrit for it, so i think it would be a new piece of data16:20
uvg_Hi, please review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/11016/ (HTTP Notifier for openstack projects)16:20
markmcmtaylor, https://github.com/markmc/git-review/commits/tags16:20
mtaylorso then yeah - open == != WIP would be most useful to markmc16:21
jeblairmarkmc, mtaylor: you can create your own per-project dashboards; let me look up the predicate16:21
jeblairgah, did the "important" patch not include a doc update? :(16:21
mtaylorjeblair: I thin kit did - but per-project dashboards != important16:22
jeblairmtaylor: um.  if it did, can you point me to the docs on the predicate that implements important?16:22
mtaylorjeblair: I do not believe there is a per-project important ... dashboards are the gerrit feature that the gerrit devs suggested we should use instead of the important patch16:23
*** markmcclain has quit IRC16:23
jeblairmtaylor: i don't think we're talking about the same thing16:23
mtaylorjeblair: ok. I think the predicate you're looking for is is:reviewable16:24
jeblairmtaylor: that's it.  :)16:24
jeblairmarkmc: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/is:reviewable+project:nova,n,z16:24
jeblairmarkmc: that's like a per-project version of the "my -> important changes" page.16:24
jeblair(at least, the center section which tells you what you need to review)16:25
jeblairmtaylor: and yeah, that's not documented.  :(16:25
markmcjeblair, awesome! my queue is empty!16:26
* markmc cracks open a beer16:26
markmcjeblair, seriously, it's empty :)16:26
jeblairmarkmc: whoops.  https://review.openstack.org/#/q/is:reviewable+project:openstack/nova,n,z16:26
jeblairmarkmc: it's called "openstack/nova" not "nova".  :)16:27
markmcjeblair, ah, right16:27
dansmithso close, huh?16:27
*** issackel_ has joined #openstack-dev16:28
*** ncode has joined #openstack-dev16:28
markmcjeblair, it looks equivalent to 'git review list' minus WIP alright16:28
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-dev16:29
*** kyriakos has quit IRC16:29
mtaylormarkmc: we could add a flag to git review list to exclude wip16:30
mtaylormarkmc: or to add is:reviewable more like16:30
*** mnewby has joined #openstack-dev16:30
markmcmtaylor, sounds good16:30
mtaylormarkmc: and then I think it's about time to release git-review16:30
*** jtran has quit IRC16:31
markmcmtaylor, I'm really looking forward to people not rebasing stuff anymore, yeah :)16:31
mtaylormarkmc: let's land is:reviewable and then cut it16:31
markmcmtaylor, sounds good :)16:31
*** jtran has joined #openstack-dev16:32
*** uvg_ has left #openstack-dev16:34
*** hemna has joined #openstack-dev16:35
*** markmc is now known as mcaway16:36
*** markmcclain has joined #openstack-dev16:36
*** armaan has joined #openstack-dev16:36
markmcclainany devstack cores available for a simple 1 line review? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/11278/16:37
*** cloudvirt has joined #openstack-dev16:38
*** utlemming has quit IRC16:40
*** garyk has joined #openstack-dev16:42
*** matiu_ is now known as matiu16:46
*** s0mik has joined #openstack-dev16:47
*** darraghb has quit IRC16:47
*** cloudvirt has quit IRC16:50
*** cloudvirt has joined #openstack-dev16:50
*** lloydde has joined #openstack-dev16:52
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net16:56
*** johnpur has joined #openstack-dev16:57
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v johnpur16:57
*** hub_cap_afk is now known as hub_cap16:57
*** anniec has joined #openstack-dev16:58
*** derekh has quit IRC16:58
*** anniec_ has joined #openstack-dev16:59
ayoungmnewby, OK,  I was able to squash our series of patches down to four without doing significant reworking17:00
mnewbyayoung: great!17:00
ayounghttps://github.com/admiyo/keystone/tree/revoked-tokens-squashed17:00
*** anniec_ has quit IRC17:01
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-dev17:01
*** anniec_ has joined #openstack-dev17:01
ayoungI am going to squash them all into one big patch.17:01
ayoungand we can look at that for review17:01
mnewbyok, cool17:01
ayoungmnewby, we'll make sure that credit is appropriately maintained.17:02
*** anniec has quit IRC17:03
*** anniec_ is now known as anniec17:03
*** thingee is now known as thingee_zz17:03
*** avishay has quit IRC17:04
ayoungmnewby, here is the unified patch.  It is surprisingly short after all is squashed https://github.com/admiyo/keystone/commit/992f37f3ff7123f236c28b0155ce4509d078565617:04
mnewbylooks good17:05
ayoungmnewby, we should have someone review the change https://github.com/admiyo/keystone/commit/992f37f3ff7123f236c28b0155ce4509d0785656#L18L25917:06
mnewbyayoung: want to post to gerrit?17:06
ayoungdolphm, I wonder if we are claiming to support Diablo tokens in Folsome?17:06
ayoungmnewby, shortly.  I have not reviewed the unified diff myself completely yet17:06
dolphmayoung: not sure about "claiming", but i believe we've maintained test coverage for diablo auth responses17:07
ayoungalso, some upstream changes probably need to be rebased before submittting.17:07
ayoungdolphm, yes, I am aware.  We made some modifications over time, though, as part of the PKI token code, and I want to make sure that we have not invalidated the assumption17:08
ayoungbut I won't put any effort in to maintaining that code if we are not going to support Diablo.  Seems like it is time for the Diablo auth to go away IMNSHO17:09
dolphmayoung: i would *really* like to maintain support if at all possible17:09
ayoungdolphm, OK.  What was the difference between Essex and Diablo token schemes?17:10
ayoungmnewby, I think that, for now, 'valid-token' should probably be replaced by DEFAULT_UUID_TOKEN, and not DEFAULT_SIGNED_TOKEN17:10
mnewbyayoung: where?17:11
dolphmayoung: look at line 450: https://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/master/keystone/middleware/auth_token.py17:11
ayounghttps://github.com/admiyo/keystone/commit/992f37f3ff7123f236c28b0155ce4509d0785656#L18L33817:11
ayoungdolphm, you realize you can give URLS with the lines, right?17:11
ayounghttps://github.com/openstack/keystone/blob/master/keystone/middleware/auth_token.py#L45017:12
dolphmayoung: how user & tenant id's & names are provided & passed via wsgi changed between pre-diablo, diablo, and essex17:12
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away17:12
dolphmayoung: did they just re-enable that? i tried it a couple times in the past week and it wouldn't link17:12
ayoungdolphm, so is that a config option on the Keystone server that decides that?17:12
*** mjfork_ has joined #openstack-dev17:13
*** Ryan_Lane has quit IRC17:13
dolphmayoung: is what a config option?17:13
dolphmayoung: oh, no... it's just how different implementations behaved17:13
ayoungdolphm, so this allows a Folsom/Essex auth_token middleware to consume the responses from diablo?17:14
*** mjfork has quit IRC17:14
*** mjfork_ is now known as mjfork17:14
dolphmayoung: yes17:15
ayoungdolphm, so they both use UUID formats,  so I think we are OK17:15
*** zing has quit IRC17:15
ayoungmnewby, ^^17:15
dolphmayoung: not necessarily17:15
ayoungdolphm, the test code was just using 'default-token' and 'diablo-token'17:16
dolphmayoung: pre-diablo in openstack returned integers (can't remember if they were represented as strings or not in json), other implementations can (and do) return other opaque strings17:16
*** armaan has left #openstack-dev17:16
ayoungmnewby, so one thing we will have to fix is to generate at different ID for the diablo responses and the essex UUID responses.  They can't both use the same UUID17:17
dolphmayoung: either way it should be an opaque string to the client17:19
ayoungdolphm, yes.17:19
*** koolhead17 has joined #openstack-dev17:20
mnewbyayoung: understood17:20
*** sstent has quit IRC17:20
*** sstent has joined #openstack-dev17:21
*** thingee_zz is now known as thingee17:23
*** armaan has joined #openstack-dev17:23
*** armaan has left #openstack-dev17:23
*** hub_cap is now known as hub_cap_afk17:24
*** danpb has quit IRC17:27
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-dev17:32
*** cloudvirt has quit IRC17:33
*** andrewbogott is now known as andrewbogott_afk17:34
*** andrewbogott_afk is now known as andrewbogott17:34
*** cloudvirt has joined #openstack-dev17:35
*** rkukura has quit IRC17:36
*** eglynn__ has quit IRC17:38
*** eglynn__ has joined #openstack-dev17:38
*** adjohn has quit IRC17:44
*** dhellmann has quit IRC17:47
*** dhellmann_ has joined #openstack-dev17:47
*** zaitcev has joined #openstack-dev17:49
*** blamar_ has joined #openstack-dev17:53
*** dubsquared has joined #openstack-dev17:54
*** blamar has quit IRC17:55
*** blamar_ is now known as blamar17:55
*** Ryan_Lane has joined #openstack-dev18:00
*** AlanClark has quit IRC18:00
*** vanchester has quit IRC18:03
*** jkoelker has quit IRC18:11
*** samkottler is now known as samkottler|noms18:12
*** kyriakos has joined #openstack-dev18:13
*** jkoelker has joined #openstack-dev18:13
*** dabo has quit IRC18:14
*** kbringard has quit IRC18:14
*** dabo has joined #openstack-dev18:15
jtrananyone know who i talk to about the upcoming summit invitations?  I never got one :(18:15
s34njgriffith: ping18:19
*** e1mer has quit IRC18:19
*** cloudvirt has quit IRC18:21
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC18:23
*** samkottler|noms is now known as samkottler18:25
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-dev18:26
*** kyriakos has quit IRC18:27
*** cloudvirt has joined #openstack-dev18:30
*** dubsquared has quit IRC18:31
*** dubsquared has joined #openstack-dev18:31
*** cloudvirt has joined #openstack-dev18:32
*** kbringard has joined #openstack-dev18:38
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-dev18:39
*** z_ has joined #openstack-dev18:40
*** cloudvirt1 has joined #openstack-dev18:40
*** BLZbubba_ has joined #openstack-dev18:41
*** cloudvirt has quit IRC18:43
ttxjtran: check with reed (Stefano)18:43
*** hub_cap_afk is now known as hub_cap18:44
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net18:44
*** dabo has quit IRC18:45
*** eglynn__ has quit IRC18:45
*** zul has quit IRC18:45
*** jcooley has quit IRC18:45
*** sdake has quit IRC18:45
*** glenc_ has quit IRC18:45
*** BLZbubba has quit IRC18:45
*** z has quit IRC18:45
*** glenc has joined #openstack-dev18:46
*** negronjl has quit IRC18:46
*** flaviamissi has quit IRC18:46
*** negronjl has joined #openstack-dev18:47
*** zing has joined #openstack-dev18:49
*** sdake has joined #openstack-dev18:51
*** jcooley has joined #openstack-dev18:51
*** dabo has joined #openstack-dev18:53
*** zul has joined #openstack-dev18:53
jgriffiths34n: pong18:53
s34njgriffith: I had some crazy thoughts I wanted to pass on18:54
jgriffiths34n: I like crazy thoughts18:54
s34njgriffith: I was fooling around with this --> https://gist.github.com/334580718:54
s34njgriffith: that is an svg that should work in your browser18:55
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-dev18:55
jgriffiths34n: k...lemme give it a go18:55
s34njgriffith: some of the nomenclature is backwards from how the code is currently named. ignore that for now18:56
jgriffiths34n: nice18:56
jgriffiths34n: Just focusing on your idea here... I like it18:56
guitarzanvishy: re: initialize_connection stuff, do you have a strong opinion about initialize_connection vs volume_attach?  Our use case is pretty simplistic at the moment18:56
s34nwell, now for the crazier part18:56
vishyguitarzan: well volume_attach only requires changes in cinder so imo that is better :018:57
vishy:p18:57
s34njgriffith: what if there was a driver for <cinder_manager> or some such?18:57
jgriffiths34n: Not sure I follow?18:57
guitarzanvishy: fair enough, I'm trying to think of a reason (besides laziness) that I want it all in one place...18:58
s34njgriffith: so you don't need a controller and a manger18:58
s34n*manager18:58
jgriffiths34n: Ahh... back to your objections on the seperate services :)18:58
s34njgriffith: one manager could control another by using a driver18:58
jgriffiths34n: You're just moving the pile around that way aren't you?18:59
s34njgriffith: no. I don't object to separate services. That svg is how I thought it should work.18:59
s34njgriffith: then I had this driver thought19:00
jgriffiths34n: So what's the advantage of managers controlling other managers?19:01
s34njgriffith: the controller and the manager would have almost identical apis anyway19:01
s34njgriffith: a controller would just repeat the command to the manager and make notes in the db19:02
jgriffiths34n: isn't that kinda what the scheduler is doing?19:04
s34njgriffith: I don't know what the scheduler does19:05
s34njgriffith: teach me?19:06
jgriffiths34n: sends requests out to different nodes depending on how you're configured19:06
*** mestery_ is now known as mestery19:06
jgriffithLet's not flood the channel, unless others hav input... I'll PM you19:06
*** dubsquared has quit IRC19:09
*** dubsquared1 has joined #openstack-dev19:09
*** johnpostlethwait has joined #openstack-dev19:10
jtranttx, thx will do19:11
*** cloudvirt1 has quit IRC19:20
*** cloudvirt has joined #openstack-dev19:21
*** dabo has left #openstack-dev19:24
*** hub_cap is now known as hub_cap_afk19:24
*** hub_cap_afk is now known as hub_cap19:25
*** steveb_ has joined #openstack-dev19:30
*** flaviamissi has joined #openstack-dev19:31
*** EmilienM has quit IRC19:34
*** milner has quit IRC19:34
*** vladimir3p has joined #openstack-dev19:35
*** dolphm has quit IRC19:38
*** darthflatus has joined #openstack-dev19:43
*** milner has joined #openstack-dev19:48
*** andrewbogott is now known as andrewbogott_afk19:53
clarkbjk0: thanks for the review on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/11378/ do you know who else I might get to review that?19:55
*** blamar_ has joined #openstack-dev19:59
smoservishy20:01
smoser30The next step is to modify the libvirt driver to match the serial20:01
smoser31number of the volume to the device name so that the volume can20:01
smoser32always be found at /dev/disk/by-id/virtio-vdc.20:01
smoseryou're not implying that nova should return the string "/dev/disk/by-id/SOMETHING_HERE" are you?20:02
*** dubsquared1 has quit IRC20:02
*** blamar has quit IRC20:03
*** blamar_ is now known as blamar20:03
vishysmoser: I was asking whether it should20:03
*** dubsquared has joined #openstack-dev20:04
vishysmoser: but perhaps the best idea is to just let the dashboard/novaclient do it20:04
smoseri just think that leaves confusion in the future when /dev/ gets reworked in linux for arbitrary-reason-here.20:04
smoser(and linux is arbitrary too, really, given freebsd)20:04
vishysmoser: sure20:04
smoserjust pass back "serial-number"20:04
smoserwhich is not arbitrary.20:04
vishyi think i prefer the idea of serial-number == volume_id20:04
smoserdo you let the user pas it in?20:05
vishysmoser or at least defaulting to volume_id, we could later add the ability to specify it.20:05
smosero. i see.20:05
smoseryeah.20:05
smoseri'm fine with that.20:05
vishysmoser: no that is not supported right now20:05
*** mcaway is now known as markmc20:06
smoseryou're saying whatever volume-id is being attached, you'll set the serial number to that.20:06
smoserright?20:06
smoseri can't think of any reason why that wouldn't work.20:07
vishysmoser: correct20:08
vishyso they always know how to find it in the guest20:08
*** StarBeast has joined #openstack-dev20:08
smoseri like it.20:08
smoserhere s a thought though.20:09
smoserby letting ime pass in a serial number, i can be guaranteed that my instance is prepared for the attachment of the device before it is attached,20:09
smoserwhere as if you return me the string, then I can't be.20:09
smoseri'm thinking about the case where I want to write a udev rule that does something on attachment (format and mount, or anything).20:10
*** blamar_ has joined #openstack-dev20:10
*** adalbas has quit IRC20:10
smoserif i only get the serial number (volume-id) back after doing the request, I'm in a race to see if i can prepare the instance before the device is attached.20:11
*** blamar__ has joined #openstack-dev20:11
*** blamar___ has joined #openstack-dev20:12
*** utlemming has joined #openstack-dev20:12
smoserthat make sense?20:13
*** blamar has quit IRC20:13
*** blamar___ is now known as blamar20:13
alexpilottijkoelker: thanks for the network_info patch in the hyper-v code!20:13
*** blamar_ has quit IRC20:14
alexpilottijkoelker: I just committed a new patchset for revision, including your patch. I also cleaned up the imports20:15
*** blamar__ has quit IRC20:15
*** andrewbogott_afk is now known as andrewbogott20:19
markmcclaindtroyer: thank you20:24
*** hub_cap is now known as hub_cap_afk20:24
*** steveb_ has quit IRC20:30
n0anottx, yes, that blueprint is implemented20:31
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-dev20:33
annegentlejgriffith: ping20:33
nati_uenoCall for review: Added -nic port=<port_uuid_in_qunatum> support  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/11424/  ( just 6 line change and I got +1 already )  :)20:35
*** mnaser has joined #openstack-dev20:35
jgriffithannegentle: pong20:38
*** littleidea has quit IRC20:38
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-dev20:38
annegentlejgriffith: pm'ed ya20:39
ttxn0ano: thx20:43
annegentlehey y'all, ignorant rpcapi.py question. There's a list of 1.42, 1.43 notes at the beginning of the file. If I have a conflict (1.4.3 duplicated), do I just add a new line with 1.44?20:48
annegentleto fix the conflict?20:49
markmcannegentle, yes, each new backwards compatible api addition should grab a new number20:51
annegentlemarkmc: great, thanks.20:52
annegentleI'm just adding a DocImpact flag to the commit message :)20:52
*** alanmac has joined #openstack-dev20:53
markmcannegentle, hmm, actually20:53
markmcannegentle, I noticed this earlier, meant to say20:53
*** jrd_ has joined #openstack-dev20:53
markmcannegentle, when you add DocImpact, it would be better if you didn't rebase20:53
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-dev20:53
markmcannegentle, i.e. if the only change you made was to the commit message20:53
annegentlemarkmc: ohhhhh git review is doing that for me though.20:53
*** jrd_ is now known as jrd-redhat20:53
markmcannegentle, yeah, run "git review -R"20:53
markmcannegentle, the next version of git-review won't do that20:54
annegentlemarkmc: oh cool, I didn't know about that20:54
annegentlewah.20:54
markmcannegentle, now, it sounds like the owner of the patch needs to rebase ... :)20:54
annegentlemarkmc: yeah lots of fast moving stuff in http://etherpad.openstack.org/nova-ffe :)20:55
* markmc nods20:55
*** koolhead17 has quit IRC20:55
jrd-redhatHi all.  I'mlooking for help with git-review.  I believe I've somehow managed to break my ssh keys on review.openstack.org, but can't seem to get them sorted out.  Anybody care to give hints?20:55
alexpilottitr3buchet: thanks for reviewing the hyper-v driver20:55
alexpilottitr3buchet: the thing w the network_info was a misunderstanding20:56
tr3buchetalexpilotti: sure no problem20:56
tr3buchetalexpilotti: what do you mean misunderstanding?20:56
alexpilottitr3buchet: I already patched it20:56
alexpilottitr3buchet: we simply didn't get it :-D20:57
tr3buchetalexpilotti: ah ok20:57
alexpilottitr3buchet: jkoelker's patch made everything clear20:57
*** hub_cap_afk is now known as hub_cap20:57
alexpilottitr3buchet: so I updated the code, tested it and sent it for a new review20:58
tr3buchetalexpilotti: great!20:58
annegentlejrd-redhat: I can try to help. If you login and look at Settings on review.openstack.org, you can see your ssh keys.20:58
jrd-redhatannegentle affirmative20:58
annegentlejrd-redhat: and I think they need to match your ones in your git profile on Github.20:58
alexpilottitr3buchet: let me know if I can help in any way in reviewing the patch!20:58
tr3buchetalexpilotti: will do20:58
alexpilottitr3buchet: tx!20:59
jrd-redhatannegentle ah.  I bet that's the part I got wrong.  Hints on how to set up on github?20:59
annegentlejrd-redhat: when you log onto github, you can click Account Settings and then SSH Keys21:00
*** dubsquared has quit IRC21:02
jrd-redhatannegentle ok will try that.  tnx.21:03
*** rpedde is now known as rpedde_away21:04
jrd-redhatannegentle nope, that didn't do it.  I set up github account wiht matching key, still can't log in to reviews.openstack.org21:07
*** AlanClark has joined #openstack-dev21:07
annegentlejrd-redhat: if you see "Permission denied" errors after git review -s, then look for the matching SSH keys. If you see "We don't know where your gerrit is." then add a new git remote. What are you seeing specifically?21:07
jrd-redhatanngentle thinking about it a bit more, I don't see why they would need to match simply to do ssh -p 29418 me@reviews.  That's purely ssh, right?21:07
annegentlejrd-redhat: I honestly don't know enough about the underpinnings. mtaylor jeblair clarkb ^^?21:08
jrd-redhatannegentle ssh jrd@review.openstack.org -p 29418 -i ~/.ssh/id-openstack21:09
jrd-redhatPermission denied (publickey).21:09
clarkbjrd-redhat: is the public key listed under your account settings in gerrit?21:09
jrd-redhatclarkb yes, correct.21:10
*** maurosr has quit IRC21:10
*** kpavel has joined #openstack-dev21:10
jrd-redhatclarkb maybe I'm totally confused.  I just went and rechecked at https://review.openstack.org/#/settings/ssh-keys21:12
jrd-redhatclarkb it sez my key is registered.  I added it again for good measure, but that had no effect.21:13
jrd-redhatclarkb am I just looking in the wrong place?21:13
clarkbno that is the correct place21:13
clarkband the username listed under https://review.openstack.org/#/settings/ is jrd?21:14
vishyannegentle: ping21:15
jrd-redhatclarkb affirmative21:16
vishyid-openstack is chmod 0600?21:16
clarkbjrd-redhat: and finally ~/.ssh/id-openstack is 600?21:16
jrd-redhatclarkb wait a sec.  in reviews.openstack-org settings page, identities, it says my username is jrd-q.  I be that';s the issue21:17
clarkbjrd-redhat: it uses your launchpad id as the username21:18
jrd-redhatclarkb hah.  yes, that's it.21:18
jrd-redhatI wonder where it came up with that?  Ok, so now I just need to fix my git config to use that userid, and I should be good to go.  Thanks!21:19
*** dprince has quit IRC21:19
clarkbjrd-redhat: https://launchpad.net/~jrd-q I assume that is you? it is using your launchpad id21:19
jrd-redhatclarkb correct.21:20
*** alop has joined #openstack-dev21:20
*** dolphm has quit IRC21:20
*** eglynn has quit IRC21:23
*** markvoelker has quit IRC21:25
*** maoy has quit IRC21:26
*** maoy has joined #openstack-dev21:26
*** mtreinish has quit IRC21:28
*** ewindisch has quit IRC21:30
*** markmc has quit IRC21:30
*** harlowja has quit IRC21:31
*** dachary has quit IRC21:31
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-dev21:32
cp16netjgriffith: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/11433/21:36
cp16net:)21:36
*** hub_cap has quit IRC21:39
jgriffithcp16net: :)21:39
jgriffithcp16net: Just finished21:39
jgriffithcp16net: Glad to see it made it!21:40
cp16netw00t21:40
cp16net:)21:40
jgriffithcp16net: Thanks for hanging in there through all the changes21:40
cp16netjgriffith: yeah thanks for letting my changes in :-P21:40
jeblairI'm going to restart jenkins because it is way slow and it's a java app and restarting it helps.  :(21:41
*** mnaser has quit IRC21:42
*** rnirmal has quit IRC21:44
bcwaldonclarkb: launchpad bugs aren't getting updated from jenkins on merge21:46
bcwaldonclarkb: or so it seems that way21:46
clarkb:( bcwaldon have an example change that was merged?21:47
bcwaldonyes21:47
bcwaldonclarkb: https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-glanceclient/+bug/103723321:47
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1037233 in python-glanceclient "glanceclient limits not working as intended" [Critical,Fix committed]21:47
bcwaldonclarkb: I manually updated that guy21:47
clarkband this is the change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/11426/ looking at this now21:49
bcwaldonyes21:49
bcwaldonsorry to make you hunt for that21:49
clarkbnp it wasn't too bad with a search in gerrit21:49
*** dspano has quit IRC21:53
jgriffithcp16net: dang!21:53
*** sandywalsh_ has quit IRC21:53
*** ywu has joined #openstack-dev21:54
cp16netjgriffith: booo21:54
*** dabo has joined #openstack-dev21:54
*** steveb_ has joined #openstack-dev21:54
jgriffithcp16net: yeah, but I can't see how this is related21:55
jgriffithcp16net: Heading across the street for a coffee... look when I get back21:56
cp16netjgriffith: yeahi dunno how to read this log21:56
*** andrewbogott is now known as andrewbogott_afk21:58
*** andrewbogott_afk is now known as andrewbogott22:00
*** markmcclain has quit IRC22:00
cp16netjgriffith: i think it has to do with the volume-usage-audit bin file i added22:00
*** openstackjenkins has quit IRC22:03
*** ywu has quit IRC22:03
*** tgall_foo has quit IRC22:03
jgriffithcp16net: I think you're right :)22:03
*** openstackjenkins has joined #openstack-dev22:04
*** lts has quit IRC22:05
jeblairclarkb: are you looking into the bug script issue bcwaldon mentioned?22:05
*** flaviamissi has quit IRC22:05
jeblairclarkb: you may find the gerrit error.log handy -- if the script emits a traceback, it gets logged there.22:05
clarkbjeblair: thank you22:06
clarkbit was working at soon as the 13th.22:06
cloudflyanyone wanna review a horizon thing for mw?22:07
cloudflyerr me even22:07
cloudflyhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/11441/22:08
vishyannegentle: ping22:08
annegentlevishy: pong22:09
vishyannegentle: I wasn't sure if you saw this: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/11263/22:09
annegentlevishy: oooo no I hadn't yet. Ooo.22:10
annegentlevishy: anyone else reacted to it yet? How do I get a "report" back?22:11
*** hub_cap has joined #openstack-dev22:11
vishyannegentle: so it writes all of the results into the samplesdir22:11
vishy(if you turn the flag for writing on)22:12
vishyso i see to potential ways to sync this into manuals22:12
vishy1 would be just copy stuff directly over22:12
annegentledo tell22:12
clarkbjeblair: there are a couple 401s but the timestamps don't seem to match up with the merge and patchset creations for bcwaldon's change22:12
vishythe problem is that certain data is a little odd looking22:12
vishynote the 127.0.0.122:12
vishyalthough i may be able to fix that22:13
vishyhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/11263/2/nova/tests/integrated/samples/server-get-resp.xml22:13
vishythe other is that there is a script that inserts friendly values into the template22:13
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC22:13
annegentleyeah 127.0.0.1 would be meaningless right?22:14
annegentle"friendly" meaning the endpoints are real?22:14
vishyyeah or at least reasonable examples22:14
vishylike example.openstack.org22:15
annegentletrystack?22:15
jeblairhow about "example.org" ?22:16
annegentlealso how do we keep the samples in sync? what's the "repo of source?"22:16
jeblairannegentle, vishy: http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2606.txt22:16
annegentlejeblair: myfakeclouddomain.com :)22:16
jeblairannegentle, vishy: example.org (.com, .net) are reserved for that purpose22:16
annegentlejeblair: oh nice22:16
jeblairyeah, using that helps avoid sending wayward traffic to unsuspecting people.  :)22:17
annegentleheh22:18
annegentlevishy: gotta get to a meeting, but I like the idea and HP and Enstratus were recently asking how they can help with such a thing22:18
*** blamar has quit IRC22:19
annegentleso this seems like a good step22:19
vishyannegentle: cool22:19
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-dev22:20
cp16netjgriffith: so i just need to add it to the setup.py scripts list i guess?22:21
jgriffithcp16net: I think so... lemme look22:22
*** lifeless has quit IRC22:22
jgriffithcp16net: yes, I think that's it22:23
jgriffithcp16net: If you have devstack handy you can try it and run the bundle exercise to make sure, but I think that's it22:23
cp16netjgriffith: yeah i just ran it all22:24
cp16netand well more than the bundle failed for me22:24
jgriffithcp16net: hmmm... ones that passed in the gate?22:25
jgriffithcp16net: So some of those will always fail on your vm/devstack22:25
cp16netjgriffith: yeah but i guess thats something else22:26
jgriffithcp16net: boot from volume etc22:26
cp16netaggrigates failed22:26
cp16netand everything after22:26
jgriffithcp16net: yeah.. you should be ok22:26
jgriffithcp16net: I cherry pick most of those exercises now TBH22:26
cp16netok22:27
jgriffithcp16net: For now I would say if the bundle exercise when run by itself passes you should have it squared away22:28
cp16netyeah i just tested that22:28
jgriffithcp16net: Cool..22:28
cp16netso i just submitted a new review22:28
cp16neterr new patch set22:28
*** datsun180b has quit IRC22:29
jgriffithcp16net: K... it's up to jenkins/tempest now22:29
*** gongys has joined #openstack-dev22:30
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-dev22:31
*** matwood has quit IRC22:31
*** maoy has quit IRC22:33
*** nati_ueno_2 has joined #openstack-dev22:34
*** dolphm has quit IRC22:35
*** nati_ueno_2 has quit IRC22:37
cp16netjgriffith: i'm doing the rain dance22:39
cp16net:)22:39
jgriffithcp16net: You and me both :)22:41
*** spiffxp has quit IRC22:41
*** alanmac has quit IRC22:41
*** cloudvirt has quit IRC22:42
*** nati_ueno has quit IRC22:45
*** nati_ueno has joined #openstack-dev22:46
*** nunosantos has quit IRC22:48
*** nati_uen_ has joined #openstack-dev22:49
*** jimfehlig has quit IRC22:49
*** AlanClark has quit IRC22:50
*** lloydde has quit IRC22:57
*** roge has quit IRC22:57
*** andrewbogott is now known as andrewbogott_afk23:00
cloudfly=/  i dislike waiting for reviews =(23:01
*** spiffxp has joined #openstack-dev23:01
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-dev23:02
cp16netjgriffith: looks like the rain dance worked23:04
cp16net:)23:04
gongysping salv-orlando23:04
jgriffithcp16net: NICE!23:04
jgriffithcp16net: Thanks again Craig!23:05
salv-orlandoHi gongys23:05
cp16netjgriffith: no worries John :)23:05
gongysI am tring to help with the https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10994/23:05
salv-orlandook23:06
cloudflyThere are times when I think to myself...  Jenkins approves, and that's enough for me.23:07
gongysSo  I will pull it down and add some test cases and fix the pep problem, and then push back.23:07
salv-orlandothat would be awesome, but keep in mind that we don't have strict deadline for client projects (they don't follow the same release schedule as server projects)23:07
salv-orlandoso the real "urgency" is on the server-side patch.23:08
*** kbringard has quit IRC23:08
salv-orlandoDid you had a chance to review the latest patch?23:08
gongysOk, I will review the latest patch first.23:09
cloudflyhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/11441/  can i get some review love?23:09
salv-orlandogongys: thanks a lot. I am going to bed in a few minutes. Dan is online today. You'll find me back in about 6 hours.23:09
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC23:09
gongyssure. sweet dream23:10
*** alexpilotti has joined #openstack-dev23:12
*** cloudvirt has joined #openstack-dev23:15
*** e1mer has joined #openstack-dev23:19
*** alexpilotti_ has joined #openstack-dev23:20
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC23:21
*** alexpilotti_ is now known as alexpilotti23:21
*** cloudvirt has quit IRC23:23
*** ewindisch has quit IRC23:23
*** alexpilotti_ has joined #openstack-dev23:25
*** salv-orlando has quit IRC23:27
*** alexpilotti has quit IRC23:27
*** alexpilotti_ is now known as alexpilotti23:27
*** ewindisch has joined #openstack-dev23:28
*** andrewbogott_afk is now known as andrewbogott23:34
*** gongys has quit IRC23:35
zulvishy: ping23:35
zulvishy: i just saw https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1037339 and this what the arch_filter does fyi23:36
uvirtbotLaunchpad bug 1037339 in nova "architecture filtering should be done in its own filter" [High,Triaged]23:36
*** alop has quit IRC23:41
vishyzul: so it sounds like the extra capabilities that he added should be added to the arch filter23:44
vishyinstead of the compute filter23:44
zulvishy: yeah i was going to do that at one time but never had the chance to23:44
*** samkottler is now known as samkottler|afk23:44
zulvishy: also xenserver stuff needs to send back the cpu capability as well23:45
zulvishy: i can look at it if you want23:45
vishymtaylor, jeblair, LinuxJedi: help: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10326/ this is stuck?23:45
vishyzul: sure here is the code he added: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/10327/23:46
zulvishy: sure i can take a look at it tomorrow23:47
clarkbvishy: https://jenkins.openstack.org/zuul/status it is currently running. looks like tempest failed though23:47
*** gongys has joined #openstack-dev23:47
*** zing has quit IRC23:53
*** matwood has joined #openstack-dev23:54
*** spiffxp has quit IRC23:55
jgriffithjeblair: thank you :)23:55
*** hemna has quit IRC23:58
*** cp16net is now known as cp16net|away23:58
*** spiffxp has joined #openstack-dev23:59
*** PotHix has quit IRC23:59
*** cp16net|away is now known as cp16net23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!