Friday, 2012-03-02

jakedahnohnoimdead: are you volunteering? because that would be awesome00:01
*** Ryan_Lane is now known as Ryan_Lane|away00:01
mnewbyI'd like to propose the addition of unittest2 to the test dependencies.00:04
mnewbyIs anyone familiar with it?00:05
*** oneiroi has quit IRC00:08
*** mattray has quit IRC00:09
rmkWhat have you guys been referring to as RC1?00:12
rmkmilestone4?00:12
*** Mandell has quit IRC00:13
*** thingee has joined #openstack-dev00:15
*** mikeyp has quit IRC00:16
*** zzed has quit IRC00:16
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-dev00:17
ohnoimdeadjakedahn: we've had some discussions and there are strong opinions on frameworks for integration tests (lots of selenium haters). we'll get some consensus and make progress on that in early folsom hopefully.00:23
*** bengrue has quit IRC00:28
jakedahncool, we should talk about it at the summit for sure - today at this hackathon people have brough it up a few times00:29
mnewbyunittest2!00:42
*** jmckenty has quit IRC00:50
*** anotherjesse has joined #openstack-dev00:52
*** adjohn has quit IRC00:54
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-dev00:54
*** adam_g has quit IRC00:56
*** spiffxp has quit IRC00:59
devcamcarwhats the other one people like … t something01:01
devcamcartwill?01:01
devcamcarhttp://twill.idyll.org/01:01
*** Mandell has quit IRC01:01
mnewbywhy do people hate selenium?01:03
mnewbyWhen it comes to performing client-side testing, nothing can touch selenium.01:04
mnewbyTwill is an also-ran, since it doesn't test in a browser.01:04
openstackgerritVerification of a change to openstack/nova failed: Remove unnecessary variables from tests  https://review.openstack.org/477601:04
mnewbyThe secret to selenium is doing golden-path only, and using something like twill for more comprehensive non-js testing.01:05
*** littleidea has quit IRC01:05
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-dev01:05
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-dev01:06
ohnoimdeadmnewby: no argument here01:06
*** littleidea has quit IRC01:06
*** pixelbeat has quit IRC01:06
*** jog0 has left #openstack-dev01:10
*** pixelbeat has joined #openstack-dev01:11
*** Ryan_Lane|away has quit IRC01:12
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC01:12
*** Ryan_Lane has joined #openstack-dev01:12
*** Ryan_Lane has quit IRC01:12
*** Ryan_Lane has joined #openstack-dev01:12
*** novas0x2a|laptop has joined #openstack-dev01:14
openstackgerritVerification of a change to openstack/horizon failed: Removed unwanted handling for the -e and -f flags in install_requires.  https://review.openstack.org/478601:14
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-dev01:17
zaitcevWow guys, did you see this  http://www.swiftstack.com/whitepaper/01:18
devcamcaranyone around to answer a q about nova-rootwrap?01:18
zaitcevClick-through to download a whitepaper? Seriously?01:18
devcamcarright now my nova-api is complaining about not being able to execute iptables-save -t filter01:18
Ryan_Lanezaitcev: clickthrough? it wants your info too01:19
termieayoung, Ryan_Lane: rpedde has some questions about the ldap in keystone that i don't know how to answer01:19
zaitcevWell I suppose that's what president@whitehouse.gov is fot.01:19
termietrying to get him to log on01:19
ayoungI'm here01:19
termieayoung: cool, he should be in momentarily01:20
*** rpedde has joined #openstack-dev01:20
termieayoung, rpedde: sounds like he is trying to fill up sample data into an ldap db, but doesn't know what structure you are using, do you have a sample data script?01:20
ayoungtermie, yes01:21
ayoungrpedde, you are looking fro the schema to use?01:21
termieayoung: that would probably be a big help if we could get at it01:21
rpeddeayoung: yes, exactly, and/or sample data01:21
ayoungtermie, that was what I wrote up here:http://adam.younglogic.com/2012/02/openstack-keystone-ldap-redux/01:22
ayoungUsers will be stored in a flat collection. ou=Users,$SUBTREE and be based on the standard LDAP objectClass inetOrgPerson which is defined in01:22
ayoungTenants are in a collection that is a peer to Users. Tenants are instancs of the groupOfNames object class01:22
ayoungthey are in the Groups subtree.01:23
ayoungreally, that is all you need.  but roles get a subtree, too. although it isn't really used.01:23
ayoungRoles are instances of the LDAP object class organizationalRole defined in /etc/openldap/schema/core.ldif. Role assignment is indicated by the presence of the User’s DN in the roleOccupant attribute.01:23
Ryan_LaneI thought roles were going to be a subentry of the tenant?01:23
*** AZ_ has quit IRC01:23
ayoungso while there is a subtree ou=Roles...01:23
ayoungRyan_Lane, they are01:23
Ryan_Laneis ou=Roles for global roles?01:23
ayoungthe Roles subtree is a vestige,  I haven't even looked at what ends up in there01:24
termiefor the record we are trying to avoid global roles01:24
Ryan_Laneah01:24
*** andrewsmedina has joined #openstack-dev01:24
termieso there shouldn't be anything in there01:24
ayoungso really, all you should need is Users and Groups01:24
ayoungtermie, yeah01:24
Ryan_Lanethat makes things painful for private clouds01:24
*** _adjohn has joined #openstack-dev01:24
termieRyan_Lane: which part?01:24
Ryan_Lanelack of global roles01:24
termieRyan_Lane: disagree but we can chat abou tit01:24
Ryan_LaneI occasionally need to do actions in all projects01:25
termieRyan_Lane: assign admin roles under and admin tenant01:25
*** gyee has quit IRC01:25
termiethe api was designed poorly so it makes it difficult to perform some actions on tenants you are not a member of01:25
* Ryan_Lane nods01:25
termiebut in general it doesn't matter01:25
termieand those api choices will be taken out back and shot01:26
Ryan_Laneheh01:26
ayoungIf we want global roles,  we should probably put them under ou=Tenants01:26
termieayoung: we don't01:26
ayoungtermie, agreeds,  just saying that having their own subtree makes no sense at all01:26
ayoungeven less sense?01:26
*** jog0 has joined #openstack-dev01:26
*** jog0 has quit IRC01:26
ayoungrpedde, is that enough information for you to go by?01:27
*** jog0 has joined #openstack-dev01:27
Ryan_Lanewell, I'd like to chat about this during the design summit...01:27
*** adjohn has quit IRC01:27
*** _adjohn is now known as adjohn01:27
*** jdg has quit IRC01:28
rpeddeayoung: good except I don't see the roles -- appears to be organizationRole objects in the tenant ou.  Does this mean that roles cannot be named the same as tenants?  i.e. admin role on an admin tenant?  Since both orgRole and groupOfNames are structural?01:29
ayoungYOU can name the role the same as the tenant01:29
ayoungit would look like this01:29
ayoungyou would have a group named01:30
ayoungdn=cn=admin,ou=Groups,cn=example,cn=com01:30
ayoungthen you would have a role01:31
ayoungdn=cn=admin,cn=admin,ou=Groups,cn=example,cn=com01:31
ayoungwe don't have nesting01:31
ayoungso there is no conflict in the naming01:31
ayounghowever01:31
ayoungrole will have objectclass=organizationalRole01:32
rpeddegotcha01:32
ayoungand group will have objectClass=groupOfNames01:32
ayoungIf it proves to be a problem,  we can make an explicit container for roles under tenants01:32
ayoungso then it would be01:32
ayoungdn=cn=admin,ou=roles,cn=admin,ou=Groups,cn=example,cn=com01:32
ayoungor something01:32
ayoungyou can override all of the values01:33
ayoungfor example say you already have user in a group called people01:33
ayoungyou would set01:33
*** jog0 has quit IRC01:33
*** PotHix has quit IRC01:33
ayounguser_tree_dn = ou=people,dc=example,dc=com01:34
ayoungall of the config values are specified in the file01:34
ayoungkeystone/config.py01:34
ayoungso if you want to change an object class or attribute,  you have the power01:35
rpeddeayoung: thanks much.  I think I was led off-track by the Roles stuff01:35
ayoungrpedde, yeah,  need to drop that,  I think01:35
ayoungI'll probably deprecate the role_tree_dn01:35
ayoungrpedde, the bits are very fresh on this stuff01:36
*** vizsla has joined #openstack-dev01:36
ayoungI know of at least one problem with LDAP that keeps it from working with the keystone client.  A patch has been submitted for that01:36
ayounghttps://review.openstack.org/#change,472501:37
ayoungRyan_Lane, can you give a code review to https://review.openstack.org/#change,476201:38
Ryan_Lanelemme see01:38
ayoungI need that so I can fixup and resubmite 472501:38
Ryan_Laneheh. yeah, but it's going to take me a bit :)01:38
Ryan_LaneI'll do it tonight01:38
*** ncode has quit IRC01:38
ayoungthanks01:39
zulheckj: pong01:39
Ryan_Laneyw01:39
heckjzul: wanted to give you a head's up on some packaging changes - horizon, specifically, has some significant change. Much simpler - so the patch is mostly deleting01:40
ayoungtermie, I have a branch with the patch from 4762 on it.  I've made an additional change which is 4725 minus the parts you said we needed to remove.  If I run git review with the same change ID,  I assume it will show up as patchset N+1 of 4725.  Is that the right thing to do?01:41
termiesounds like it01:41
zulheckj: yeah saw the email....started on the packaging changes last night01:41
heckjzul: cool01:42
notmynamemnewby: ping01:43
mnewbynotmyname: pong01:43
heckjzul: I've also ended up making a nova-consoleauth package locally - separate process in devstack. The vnc changes are all over the place01:43
notmynamemnewby: another question about the tox patch for swift01:44
mnewbyshoot01:44
notmynamemnewby: according to your last comment on it, it does introduce pep8 gating for swift?01:44
mnewbyIt is intended to.01:44
mnewbyIt doesn't have to though - whoever configures Jenkins can run only the unit tests.01:45
notmynamemnewby: ok, let me go change my vote. we don't want pep8 gating01:45
*** maplebed has quit IRC01:45
mnewbyThe default is configured to run py26.py27,pep8, but Jenkins can be configured to run whichever of the configured tox builds.01:45
mnewbyWhy the aversion to pep8 gating?01:45
mnewbyswift already complies with it.01:46
notmynamemnewby: personally, I see it as a guideline instead of a hard requirement.01:46
notmynameswift tests don't pass it01:46
mnewbyThey do01:46
mnewbyI made sure of it01:46
mnewbyOr do you mean the unit tests?01:46
notmynameunit tests01:46
mnewbyThe configured pep8 build only checks the code.01:47
mnewbyI wouldn't have submitted this change if the builds wouldn't run.01:47
mnewbyI'm pretty sure this is standard in openstack projects.  The tests don't have to pass pep8.01:47
notmynamemnewby: and I'm also not going to introduce another gating mechanism without support from the other core devs (who don't want pep8 gating). I think we all have our reasons, but generally, we don't want to force that requirement01:47
mnewby*sigh* sure01:48
mnewbyNo reason for openstack projects to actually be consistent.01:48
*** vizsla has quit IRC01:48
zulheckj: wha?01:49
*** madhav has quit IRC01:49
*** rpedde has quit IRC01:49
*** vizsla has joined #openstack-dev01:50
ayoungtermie, git review is smareter than I am:  "You have more than one commit that you are about to submit....Is this really what you meant to do?"01:50
mnewbynotmyname: I say again, this patch doesn't introduce pep8 gating anymore than pep8's existence introduces pep8 gating.  It is up to the CI team to enable pep8 gating in jenkins.01:50
ayoungit wants to submit both yours and mine....01:50
heckjzul: there's a new binary that does expiration of VNC auth tokens - it's called "nova-consoleauth". I made a package in my local nova package cluster to run that separately, with upstart scripts, etc.01:51
zulheckj: ah cool cool..01:51
notmynamemnewby: but the submitted patch would be the config the CI team uses for gating?01:51
notmynamemnewby: *patch == config file01:52
mnewbynotmyname: The submitted patch introduces many available builds.  The CI team can configure jenkins to use any of them.  There is no requirement to use the default builds.01:52
mnewbynotmyname: I suggest talking to monty about it.  He's the person I worked with to introduce this change, and he's likely the person responsible for configuring jenkins once the change goes in.01:53
notmynamemnewby: will do. thanks for the clarification01:54
*** Mandell has quit IRC01:56
*** torgomatic has quit IRC01:57
mnewbynotmyname: It is probably also possible to have jenkins run pep8 and report success or failure, but not have the result gate the commits.  That way those that care about pep8 compliance can worry about it, and those that do not can continue to ignore it.01:59
*** andrewsben has joined #openstack-dev02:01
*** mnewby has quit IRC02:05
*** adam_g has joined #openstack-dev02:07
anotherjesseannegentle: this might work - https://review.openstack.org/#change,4791,patchset=1 - it adds "Last updated on Tue Feb 28 19:29:28 2012, commit 95413dc." in the copyright line02:13
*** ewanmellor has left #openstack-dev02:13
*** rods has quit IRC02:14
*** vincentricci has quit IRC02:15
hazmatcan anyone describe the problem with the previous attempt db_pool/tpool usage?02:22
hazmater.. just a link to a bug02:23
*** andrewsben has quit IRC02:23
*** madhav has joined #openstack-dev02:25
*** anotherjesse has quit IRC02:25
annegentleooo coooool02:25
novas0x2a|laptopis there documentation on what exactly launchpad does with tying bug status to commit messages?02:30
novas0x2a|laptopi wanted to reference a bug, but it looks like now if my merge is accepted it will close that bug; that bug isn't fixed by my merge02:31
openstackgerritVerification of a change to openstack/horizon failed: One last fix to setup.py to avoid package name conflicts for dev packages.  https://review.openstack.org/479502:37
openstackgerritVerification of a change to openstack/horizon failed: One last fix to setup.py to avoid package name conflicts for dev packages.  https://review.openstack.org/479502:39
*** novas0x2a|laptop has quit IRC02:41
*** Ryan_Lane has quit IRC02:43
*** shevek_ has quit IRC02:46
*** adjohn has quit IRC02:48
*** pixelbeat has quit IRC02:56
*** flaviamissi_ has joined #openstack-dev02:58
*** flaviamissi has quit IRC03:02
*** danwent has quit IRC03:03
*** thingee has quit IRC03:03
*** flaviamissi_ is now known as flaviamissi03:07
*** andrewsben has joined #openstack-dev03:08
*** jdurgin has quit IRC03:09
*** dalang has left #openstack-dev03:14
*** madhav has quit IRC03:21
*** heckj has quit IRC03:21
openstackgerritVerification of a change to openstack/horizon failed: Removed period from login status.  https://review.openstack.org/479003:28
*** dubsquared has joined #openstack-dev03:30
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-dev03:39
*** adiantum has joined #openstack-dev03:44
*** anotherjesse has joined #openstack-dev03:45
*** anotherjesse has quit IRC03:46
*** clayg has quit IRC03:47
*** clayg_ is now known as clayg03:47
*** clayg_ has joined #openstack-dev03:48
*** dubsquared has quit IRC03:58
*** flaviamissi has quit IRC03:59
*** dubsquared has joined #openstack-dev04:02
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-dev04:03
*** dolphm has quit IRC04:04
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-dev04:07
*** andrewsmedina has quit IRC04:10
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-dev04:19
jeblairnotmyname, mnewby: our practice with tox-based tests is to make a jenkins job for each test environment and run only that one in that job.  so for quantum there are gate-quantum-python26, gate-quantum-python27, and gate-quantum-pep8 jobs.  since swift doesn't gate on pep8, we won't create a gate-swift-pep8 job.  however, we will update the swift-pep8 job, which runs post-commit, to use the pep8 environment provided by tox.04:25
*** novas0x2a has joined #openstack-dev04:26
novas0x2ai asked earlier, but i was offline for a bit; how does the autolinkify stuff work between git commit messages and launchpad?04:27
jeblairnovas0x2a: hi04:28
novas0x2ahiya.04:28
jeblairnovas0x2a: if you reference a bug in a commit, it will update the bug with a link to the commit and set it to "in progress" when the patchset is first uploaded.  when it's merged, it will set the bug to "fix committed".04:29
jeblairit never automatically sets it to "fix released".04:29
novas0x2athe commit in question affects a bug but doesn't fix it; is there any way to do that without making it switch to "fix committed"?04:29
jeblairif it's wrong, you can change it back in launchpad -- the scripted action is one-time only (it won't reset it again behind your back)04:29
novas0x2abecause it's not a fix04:29
jeblairnot that i'm aware of, other than to name the bug in a way that doesn't match the regex (which is pretty inclusive).04:31
jeblairthere is one other thing...04:31
jeblairit only updates bugs in the context of the project the patch is for; so if you are patching nova and the bug is not targeted to nova, it won't update it.04:32
*** zaitcev has quit IRC04:32
novas0x2ais this launchpad code, or something specific to us? (i.e. where's the code so i can fix it :))04:32
jeblair(just in case that happens to apply to what you're doing)04:32
jeblairhttps://github.com/openstack/openstack-ci/blob/master/gerrit/update_bug.py04:33
jeblairit's ours, and patches are welcome!04:33
novas0x2ato be honest, i strongly prefer the trac long-form syntax ("fixes bug #10", "references #3") but it's probably too late to make that drastic of a change04:35
uvirtbot`Launchpad bug 10 in launchpad "It says "displaying matching bugs 1 to 8 of 8", but there is 9" [Medium,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1004:35
jeblairthat's a good approach, but we'd have to ask developers to be much more consistent with how commit messages are written.  right now we're all over the place, and the script/regex reflects that.04:37
*** Vek has quit IRC04:38
*** eglynn_ has joined #openstack-dev04:46
*** danwent has joined #openstack-dev04:48
*** eglynn has quit IRC04:49
*** nikhil_ has quit IRC04:51
*** mjfork has quit IRC04:56
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC05:05
*** danwent has quit IRC05:05
*** dtroyer has quit IRC05:05
*** zigo has joined #openstack-dev05:06
*** winston-d has quit IRC05:28
*** madhav has joined #openstack-dev05:31
*** zykes- has quit IRC05:38
*** bengrue has joined #openstack-dev05:41
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-dev05:43
*** madhav has left #openstack-dev05:46
rmkHmm, are the PPAs being updated anymore?05:47
rmkMilestone PPA's latest are E2 packages05:47
*** asdfasdfasdf has joined #openstack-dev05:52
*** asdfasdfasdf has left #openstack-dev05:55
*** anotherjesse has joined #openstack-dev06:02
*** adjohn has quit IRC06:04
*** gregburek has quit IRC06:05
*** anotherjesse has joined #openstack-dev06:05
*** zykes has quit IRC06:09
*** littleidea has quit IRC06:10
*** anotherjesse has quit IRC06:11
*** anotherjesse has joined #openstack-dev06:16
*** mihgen has joined #openstack-dev06:19
*** anotherjesse_ has joined #openstack-dev06:20
*** anotherjesse_ has quit IRC06:22
*** anotherjesse is now known as anotherjesse_zz06:30
*** anotherjesse_zz is now known as anotherjesse06:31
*** thingee has joined #openstack-dev06:31
*** anotherjesse is now known as anotherjesse_zz06:32
*** anotherjesse_zz is now known as anotherjesse06:33
*** vizsla has quit IRC06:33
*** thingee has quit IRC06:33
*** thingee has joined #openstack-dev06:34
*** x86brandon has quit IRC06:34
*** berendt has joined #openstack-dev06:36
*** shevek_ has joined #openstack-dev06:40
anotherjessemtaylor: does this build https://jenkins.openstack.org/view/Keystone/job/keystone-docs/ really update http://keystone.openstack.org/ ? if so is there a cache or something?06:41
*** thingee has quit IRC06:41
*** thingee has joined #openstack-dev06:42
openstackgerritVerification of a change to openstack/horizon failed: Removed period from login status.  https://review.openstack.org/479006:43
*** thingee has quit IRC06:54
*** thingee has joined #openstack-dev06:55
*** thingee has quit IRC06:59
*** thingee has joined #openstack-dev06:59
jeblairanotherjesse: yes, but https://github.com/openstack/keystone/commit/f8ba5af130b7ec2d2ec8c0abcadbc27275467ab8 changed where the output ended up.  i updated the jenkins job and re-ran it.07:20
anotherjessejeblair: the change was wanted - for project-wide standardization?07:20
*** thingee has quit IRC07:20
*** thingee has joined #openstack-dev07:21
jeblairyep.  we're trying to get all the projects presenting the same interface to jenkins.  this will help, but we might run into things like this where jenkins and the project configs get out of sync.07:21
*** bengrue has quit IRC07:24
anotherjessejeblair: seems like the content is still old07:25
rmkseems like essex even right now is in better shape than diablo stable07:28
anotherjessermk: :)07:28
anotherjessermk: I hope lots of organizations will be banging against it to smooth out the rough edges07:28
rmkwe're definitely going to be doing that07:29
rmkfrom this point forward we're not deploying diablo anymore, no real reason to do so07:30
*** dolphm has quit IRC07:38
*** zigo has quit IRC07:39
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-dev07:41
*** Mandell has quit IRC07:50
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-dev07:56
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-dev07:56
*** ches has quit IRC08:12
*** ches has joined #openstack-dev08:13
*** sniperd has quit IRC08:18
*** sniperd has joined #openstack-dev08:18
*** eglynn_ has quit IRC08:19
*** tserong has quit IRC08:19
*** ghe_ has quit IRC08:23
*** ghe_ has joined #openstack-dev08:24
*** anotherjesse is now known as anotherjesse_zz08:25
*** apevec has joined #openstack-dev08:31
*** zigo has joined #openstack-dev08:32
*** mancdaz has joined #openstack-dev08:42
*** tserong has joined #openstack-dev08:49
*** zigo has quit IRC08:52
*** zigo has joined #openstack-dev08:55
*** dneary has joined #openstack-dev08:55
*** dneary has joined #openstack-dev08:55
*** eglynn_ has joined #openstack-dev08:57
*** derekh has joined #openstack-dev09:02
*** eglynn_ has quit IRC09:03
*** bencherian has quit IRC09:04
*** oneiroi has joined #openstack-dev09:08
*** oneiroi has joined #openstack-dev09:08
*** oneiroi has quit IRC09:08
*** oneiroi has joined #openstack-dev09:08
*** eglynn_ has joined #openstack-dev09:25
*** eglynn_ has quit IRC09:30
*** adjohn has quit IRC09:56
*** HugoKuo_ has quit IRC10:06
*** eglynn_ has joined #openstack-dev10:10
*** pixelbeat has joined #openstack-dev10:13
*** eglynn__ has joined #openstack-dev10:15
*** eglynn_ has quit IRC10:16
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-dev10:19
*** eglynn__ has quit IRC10:19
*** darraghb has joined #openstack-dev10:31
openstackgerritVerification of a change to openstack/glance failed: Added first step of babel-based translations.  https://review.openstack.org/432610:32
*** hashar has joined #openstack-dev10:35
*** adiantum has quit IRC10:36
*** Mandell has quit IRC10:36
*** flaviamissi has joined #openstack-dev10:44
*** bencherian has joined #openstack-dev10:44
*** flaviamissi has quit IRC10:48
*** hashar has quit IRC10:51
*** mancdaz has quit IRC11:13
*** mancdaz1203 has quit IRC11:13
*** dneary has quit IRC11:13
*** mancdaz has joined #openstack-dev11:14
*** shang has quit IRC11:24
*** vizsla has joined #openstack-dev11:46
*** mancdaz has quit IRC11:49
*** rods has joined #openstack-dev11:54
*** adiantum has joined #openstack-dev11:55
*** hashar has joined #openstack-dev11:56
*** hashar has quit IRC11:59
berendtis the horizon milestone 4 tarball broken?12:29
berendtthere is no manage.py included for example12:29
*** hashar has joined #openstack-dev12:30
chmouelI think there is missing some files on it12:30
chmouelttx: ^^12:30
berendtREADME.rst is also missing.. setup.py failed..12:31
ttxberendt: could be, they changed the packaging just before E412:32
ttxberendt: please file bug12:33
berendtwhy do that just before the release?12:34
ttxberendt: E4 is not a release, it's a milestone... so that we catch that kind of issue before the final release :)12:35
ttxso I prefer theyt change it just before, rather than just after.12:35
berendti meant before the milestone release12:35
*** mdomsch has joined #openstack-dev12:54
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC12:55
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-dev13:06
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-dev13:08
vizslamayonnaise13:17
apevecvizsla, is that short for "milestone release" ?13:22
*** andrewsben has quit IRC13:22
smoservishy, sorry. here now.13:30
*** lts has joined #openstack-dev13:32
*** kbringard has joined #openstack-dev13:34
*** bsza has joined #openstack-dev13:35
*** andrewsmedina has joined #openstack-dev13:40
*** dtroyer has joined #openstack-dev13:40
*** ncode has joined #openstack-dev13:41
*** ncode has joined #openstack-dev13:41
*** dneary has joined #openstack-dev13:47
*** dneary has quit IRC13:47
*** dneary has joined #openstack-dev13:47
*** dprince has joined #openstack-dev13:54
*** hashar has quit IRC14:07
*** mjfork has joined #openstack-dev14:07
*** mattray has joined #openstack-dev14:15
*** flaviamissi has joined #openstack-dev14:33
*** ncode has quit IRC14:35
*** griff has joined #openstack-dev14:35
*** stuntmachine has joined #openstack-dev14:38
smoservishy, i have a ping for you when you get in14:38
smoserregarding https://review.openstack.org/#change,4788,patchset=1 and https://review.openstack.org/#change,402514:39
smoser(your change, and mine that did some things similar)14:39
annegentletax or another admin, can you approve Jacek Artymiak on  https://launchpad.net/~openstack-cla/+members#proposed14:41
*** ncode has joined #openstack-dev14:41
smoservishy, i hadded comment to the changeset.14:44
*** ncode has quit IRC14:49
*** griff is now known as jdg14:50
*** Gordonz has joined #openstack-dev14:52
*** zykes- has joined #openstack-dev14:56
*** dtroyer has quit IRC14:58
*** ncode has joined #openstack-dev15:00
*** ncode has joined #openstack-dev15:00
*** ncode has quit IRC15:03
*** ncode has joined #openstack-dev15:05
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-dev15:06
*** ncode has quit IRC15:06
*** ncode has joined #openstack-dev15:08
*** ncode has joined #openstack-dev15:08
*** dtroyer has joined #openstack-dev15:11
*** ncode has quit IRC15:12
*** ncode has joined #openstack-dev15:14
*** ncode has joined #openstack-dev15:14
*** ncode has quit IRC15:17
jeblairanotherjesse_zz: i believe http://keystone.openstack.org/ is pointing to the right docs now; but there seems to be a lot missing.15:18
*** zykes- has quit IRC15:19
*** ncode has joined #openstack-dev15:20
*** ncode has joined #openstack-dev15:20
*** ncode has quit IRC15:21
*** littleidea has quit IRC15:21
*** ncode has joined #openstack-dev15:23
*** ncode has joined #openstack-dev15:23
*** ncode has quit IRC15:23
*** ncode has joined #openstack-dev15:26
*** ncode has joined #openstack-dev15:26
*** ncode has joined #openstack-dev15:27
*** ncode has joined #openstack-dev15:27
*** dayou has quit IRC15:32
*** zykes- has joined #openstack-dev15:33
*** dayou has joined #openstack-dev15:33
*** nikhil has quit IRC15:34
*** hhoover has joined #openstack-dev15:38
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-dev15:39
*** zykes- has quit IRC15:39
*** cp16net has joined #openstack-dev15:42
*** zzed has joined #openstack-dev15:44
*** cmagina_ has joined #openstack-dev15:45
*** cmagina has quit IRC15:45
*** danwent has joined #openstack-dev15:47
*** dayou has quit IRC15:48
*** cp16net has joined #openstack-dev15:53
openstackgerritVerification of a change to openstack/nova failed: Remove unnecessary setting up and down of mox and stubout  https://review.openstack.org/478915:53
*** rkukura has quit IRC15:54
*** rkukura has joined #openstack-dev15:55
*** zykes- has joined #openstack-dev16:03
*** hub_cap has joined #openstack-dev16:06
davidkranzjaypipes: Ping16:08
jaypipesdavidkranz: 1 min16:09
davidkranzOK16:09
*** dolphm has quit IRC16:11
jaypipesdavidkranz: alrighty16:12
davidkranzHere16:12
jaypipesdavidkranz: so, let's discuss the exception handling stuff (diff between diablo and essex)16:13
davidkranzOK, I didn't want to hardcode the bogus error codes into the test for diablo16:13
davidkranzBut it would be easy to do that16:13
jaypipesdavidkranz: I think first we need to determine if they are bogus or not, according to the API spec.16:14
jaypipesdavidkranz: if Diablo is throwing the wrong error code, we should log a bug for that16:14
davidkranzI thought 500 was always bogus, no?16:15
jaypipesdavidkranz: yes, it is... just want to make sure that if the 4xx codes are different between diablo and essex, that those diffs are valid...16:15
jaypipesdavidkranz: sorry, kinda talking about two things here :)16:16
davidkranzOK, there were only one or two of those. I'll check them.16:16
jaypipesdavidkranz: do we have a list of the places 500s are being thrown?16:16
davidkranzNo, but I can create one if that would be useful.16:17
jaypipesdavidkranz: yes, that would be good, just to track.16:18
*** utlemming has joined #openstack-dev16:18
davidkranzAnything else, progress on the stress tests?16:19
*** vincentricci has joined #openstack-dev16:19
*** eglynn has quit IRC16:19
jaypipesdavidkranz: will have that done today. sorry, been battling flu-like symptoms for what is almost 3 weeks now :( difficult to focus..16:20
davidkranzThat's too bad. I will be in Taiwan next week so probably will miss the meeting.16:20
jaypipesdavidkranz: I will be at PyCon so will definitely miss the meeting...16:20
jaypipesdavidkranz: I will ping daryl to see if he can lead.16:20
davidkranzAt the end of the day, what are you suggesting the diablo exception catch type should be when diablo does the wrong thing?16:21
davidkranzThat is, are you suggesting I change the code I submitted or just provide more informatino about what diablo is actually doing.16:22
*** rkukura has quit IRC16:23
davidkranzjaypipes: still there? Need answer to last question..16:27
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-dev16:27
jaypipesdavidkranz: ah, sorry, lookiing...16:29
jaypipesdavidkranz: so I would take the following approach:16:30
jaypipesa) IF Diablo is returning a 500 for a Compute API call that it should be returning a non-500 return code for (according to the Diablo Compute spec), file a bug against Nova and use nose.skip() on that test -- indicating in the Skip message the bug report on LP that is relevant16:31
jaypipesb) If Diablo is returning a code different from Essex for the same API call, double-check if that is expected per the Diablo Compute spec. If it is, simply change the stable/diablo test case in question to expect the different return code. If not, file a bug as per a) above...16:32
jaypipesdavidkranz: in all cases, the source of truth is the compute API spec. if the result is different from the spec, follow a) above.16:33
chmoueljaypipes: are we in complete feature freeze for glance? would like to add auth_version 2.0 to swift connector16:33
jaypipeschmouel: that's fine. we can target a bug like that to RC1 milestone.16:34
davidkranzThe reason I didn't skip is that if some one changes diablo and some API starts returning 200 instead of 500, the test won't fail.16:34
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-dev16:34
jaypipesdavidkranz: nobody is going to change diablo unless the patch specifically fixes a bug...16:34
jaypipesdavidkranz: there are no changes to the API spec allowed to diablo any more.16:34
davidkranzI know but the point of a regression test like this is to make sure they don't break something else while fixing a specific bug.16:35
davidkranzAnother bug, that is.16:35
jaypipesdavidkranz: I understand you, I'm just saying there's not a better way to do it, at least, AFAICT. :) We need to be vigilant about when skipper bugs are fixed in the various releases, and unskip the test case when the bug is fixed... unless you want to go through the effort of doing some launchpadlib-foo to determine if a bug is indeed fixed?16:36
*** PotHix has joined #openstack-dev16:37
jaypipesdavidkranz: launchpadlib-fu isn't out of the question... but it would be a significant undertaking (because you would need to track against individual releases -- and you'd need to do that by ensuring the bug in question was tagged with a release name)16:38
*** rkukura has joined #openstack-dev16:38
davidkranzGiven your strong feelings about this I think it would be best to just change the code to catch what is actually being thrown and note the bug number. That way, any change will cause the test to fail and then be fixed.16:39
*** jdg has quit IRC16:39
jaypipesdavidkranz: ok, that works too... Just make sure to make a comment in there explaining why the test is validating a bug.16:41
davidkranzThat shouldn't take too long. Will do.16:42
*** Vek has joined #openstack-dev16:42
jaypipesdavidkranz: cheers mate. thx for your effort on this!16:43
mtayloranotherjesse_zz: nice addition of git build info to sphinx for keystone - I think we should add that to the consistent project foo16:43
chmouel+116:45
*** crobinso has quit IRC16:46
*** Mandell has joined #openstack-dev16:51
*** anotherjesse_zz is now known as anotherjesse16:51
anotherjessemtaylor: i've got a patch for nova - https://review.openstack.org/4800 - going to propose for horizon/swift/glance next16:54
*** ncode has quit IRC16:54
*** bengrue has joined #openstack-dev16:56
*** mdomsch_ has joined #openstack-dev16:56
mtaylor anotherjesse awesome16:57
mtayloranotherjesse: hey - can you wrap the git_cmd chunk in a try?16:58
anotherjessesure16:58
mtayloranotherjesse: that's going to break folks building the docs from a tarball, which I believe happens in the debian packaging build16:58
mtaylor(or should)16:58
mtaylorI suppose I could have written that in code review...16:59
*** dprince has quit IRC17:00
*** dprince has joined #openstack-dev17:01
*** maplebed has joined #openstack-dev17:01
*** reed has joined #openstack-dev17:01
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-dev17:02
*** crobinso has joined #openstack-dev17:03
*** dolphm has quit IRC17:05
*** letterj has joined #openstack-dev17:05
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v letterj17:05
*** derekh has quit IRC17:07
letterjLinuxJedi: No movement on my launchpad ticket. Any ideas how long a resolution might take?17:08
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-dev17:13
*** oneiroi has quit IRC17:14
*** heckj has joined #openstack-dev17:16
*** anotherjesse is now known as anotherjesse_zz17:22
*** anotherjesse_zz is now known as anotherjesse17:25
*** n0ano has quit IRC17:27
*** eglynn has quit IRC17:29
*** hub-cap has joined #openstack-dev17:29
*** davlap has joined #openstack-dev17:29
*** torgomatic has joined #openstack-dev17:29
anotherjessemtaylor: don't think it is an issue - replied in review17:31
*** x86brandon has joined #openstack-dev17:31
*** spiffxp has joined #openstack-dev17:31
*** x86brandon has quit IRC17:31
*** x86brandon has joined #openstack-dev17:31
*** oneiroi has joined #openstack-dev17:33
mtayloranotherjesse: awesome. approved!17:33
*** hub_cap has quit IRC17:33
*** hub-cap is now known as hub_cap17:33
*** jdg has joined #openstack-dev17:43
*** darraghb has quit IRC17:43
*** milner has quit IRC17:50
*** madhav has joined #openstack-dev17:50
*** milner has joined #openstack-dev17:50
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-dev17:50
*** jdurgin has joined #openstack-dev17:52
*** ncode has joined #openstack-dev17:53
*** milner has quit IRC17:55
*** milner has joined #openstack-dev17:56
*** ncode has quit IRC17:56
*** thingee has joined #openstack-dev18:03
*** rbasak has quit IRC18:04
*** maplebed has quit IRC18:04
*** mnewby has joined #openstack-dev18:04
*** mikeyp has joined #openstack-dev18:06
*** maplebed has joined #openstack-dev18:07
*** zigo has quit IRC18:07
ayounganotherjesse or heckj, can you review https://review.openstack.org/#change,476218:12
ayoungIt is right and proper,  and I have work that depends on it18:12
*** bodepd_ has quit IRC18:12
mikeypI"m looking at bug 933948 - volumes API doesn't filter by name.18:12
anotherjesseayoung: reading18:13
mikeypThe volumes API currently has no support for any filters - I can add, but is this supposed to be in Essex or is it a new feature ?18:14
*** maplebed has quit IRC18:15
*** rpedde has joined #openstack-dev18:15
mtayloranotherjesse: you guys are using in-memory sqlite for db backend in unittests somewhere, yeah?18:15
anotherjessemtaylor: I think termie has keystone setup to use in-memory for tests18:16
Kiallmikeyp: I would imagine that would be both an API change, and additional feature.. Neither if which are allowed anymore in essex ;)18:16
*** mnewby has quit IRC18:16
mtayloranotherjesse: cool. I've got a guy wanting to do a similar thing - I'll have him look at termie's work in keystone18:16
anotherjesseayoung: I think it is good - btw, you know you can do another commit after your current commit; git review will send both as two different reviews with proper dependencies18:17
*** jog0 has joined #openstack-dev18:17
*** heckj has quit IRC18:19
*** mihgen has quit IRC18:19
anotherjessemtaylor: thoughts on https://review.openstack.org/4811 ?18:20
ayounganotherjesse, yes, but in this case,  It was getting confused because the original commit was termie's  which I then modified and I didn't want to send again18:21
mikeypKiall: that's what I thought - will update bug and move on.18:21
anotherjesseayoung: k I'm asking others to review - I already gave +218:21
*** hub_cap has quit IRC18:21
*** hub_cap has joined #openstack-dev18:22
ayounganotherjesse, thanks18:22
*** eglynn has quit IRC18:25
*** shevek_ has quit IRC18:26
annegentlettx vishy notmyname or jaypipes can you approve Jacek Artymiak on  https://launchpad.net/~openstack-cla/+members#proposed please?18:27
*** dalang has joined #openstack-dev18:30
*** utlemming has quit IRC18:33
jaypipesannegentle: done18:33
annegentlejaypipes: thanks!18:33
*** kyriakos has left #openstack-dev18:34
ayoungtermie, OK, so by me modifying    https://review.openstack.org/#change,4762I actually slowed things down... anotherjesse has reviewed,  I've reveiwed your stuff.  If you add your click to the list,  either you or anotherjesse can approve.  All of my changes are confined to https://review.openstack.org/#patch,sidebyside,4762,3,tests/_ldap_livetest.py18:34
*** utlemming has joined #openstack-dev18:35
*** littleidea has quit IRC18:35
*** anotherjesse is now known as anotherjesse_zz18:36
*** markvoelker has quit IRC18:41
*** vizsla has quit IRC18:44
*** vizsla has joined #openstack-dev18:44
*** bsza has quit IRC18:44
*** jdg has quit IRC18:45
*** jdg has joined #openstack-dev18:46
*** mnewby has joined #openstack-dev18:47
*** davlap has quit IRC18:51
*** anotherjesse_zz is now known as anotherjesse18:52
anotherjesseayoung: 4762 was approved - waiting on merge18:53
ayounganotherjesse, thanks.  Just saw that myself18:53
ayounganotherjesse, is there any reason not to use a Public Key approach for tokens?  It would mean that  'stack services wouldn't need to talk back to keystone to verify tokens.18:54
anotherjesseayoung: you mean don't just have text blobs that keystone gives to client, client gives to service, service sends to keystone?18:55
ayounganotherjesse, so if you take that text blob and encrypt it with a private key,  the services can confirm it came from keystone without phoning home18:56
ayoungkeystone publishes a public key18:56
ayoungand, say glance,  uses that public key to decrypt the token.  If it works,  then the token came from Keystone18:57
anotherjessethe service would still need to retrieve the information from keystone (user/tenant/roles/...) -- in general we want to move to something more like what you are talking about.  the reason for the current design is historical reasons18:57
anotherjessefolsom baby :)18:57
ayoungall that stuff can be in the token18:58
*** andrewsben has joined #openstack-dev18:58
ayounga user can get one token per tenant,  or a mega-token with all of their info in it18:58
ayoungwe cn use X509 or our own format depending on the constraints18:59
ayoungI'd prefer to not invent our own format if we don't have to18:59
anotherjessewant to start collecting your ideas in a wiki page? since this is definitely something we want to visit at the summit18:59
ayounganotherjesse, http://adam.younglogic.com/2012/03/pki-for-keystone/18:59
ayoungI started there thinking I would cut and paste to Etherpad at some point19:00
openstackgerritVerification of a change to openstack/keystone failed: standardize ldap and related tests  https://review.openstack.org/476219:00
anotherjesseeven better - http://wiki.openstack.org/KeystoneFolsomSummitTopics is a ROUGH collection of topics we might want to think about at the summit - want to add yours19:00
ayounganotherjesse, is there any more information why that failed?19:01
anotherjessethe console output usually has more info19:02
anotherjesselet's re-trigger - I think this is an issue with the test that dtroyer is working on - filed a bug related to that last night19:03
*** andrewsben has quit IRC19:03
anotherjesseayoung: https://bugs.launchpad.net/devstack/+bug/94459319:04
uvirtbot`Launchpad bug 944593 in devstack "exercise should catch launch failure earlier" [Medium,Confirmed]19:04
*** dneary has quit IRC19:04
anotherjesseayoung: in the meantime have a core person click "approve" a few times if needed - I have to head to airport soon19:04
ayounganotherjesse, possibly also due to changing what is returned from a user object,  which is why all of the other tests had to be modified in that patch19:04
ayoungdolphm, you are core,  right?  care to re-approve ?19:05
anotherjesseayoung: could be - in which case <3 gating :)19:05
ayoung+119:05
*** anotherjesse is now known as anotherjesse_zz19:05
dtroyeranotherjesse:  that is the same failure that busted essex-kvm this morning19:06
*** gyee has joined #openstack-dev19:06
dolphmayoung: sure19:06
dtroyerI'm not sure what the actual cause is; I'm just detecting the failures quicker in the exercises now19:06
ayoungis there any way to see the output of the failure run?19:07
dolphmayoung: yes..19:09
dolphmayoung: https://jenkins.openstack.org/job/gate-integration-tests-devstack-vm/2033/console19:09
dolphmayoung: from the review, click the failed job, and hit console output to get this ^19:09
termiethis could use some love at some point, https://review.openstack.org/#change,465919:09
*** x86brandon has quit IRC19:10
ayoungtermie, I'll take a look after this meeting I'm in...19:10
*** x86brandon has joined #openstack-dev19:10
*** madhav has quit IRC19:10
*** madhav has joined #openstack-dev19:10
*** andrewsben has joined #openstack-dev19:21
*** adiantum has quit IRC19:21
*** maplebed has joined #openstack-dev19:22
jdgvim WriteGateInterface.cpp19:27
jdgald19:27
jdgcrap19:27
*** heckj has joined #openstack-dev19:28
*** heckj has quit IRC19:29
*** letterj has left #openstack-dev19:31
jdgbcwaldon: Are you available for a minute or so?19:33
*** berendt has quit IRC19:39
*** hhoover has left #openstack-dev19:39
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-dev19:40
*** Gordonz has quit IRC19:40
*** Gordonz has joined #openstack-dev19:41
*** littleidea has joined #openstack-dev19:42
*** mihgen has joined #openstack-dev19:46
vishywow a threaded openstack mail archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/openstack@lists.launchpad.net/19:51
* vishy dances19:51
*** mszilagyi has joined #openstack-dev19:51
vishysmoser: hmm i meant to link the bug in.  Oops19:52
*** mattray has quit IRC19:52
*** n0ano has joined #openstack-dev19:52
smoservishy, what do you think about my 'names in glance' solution rather than yours ?19:53
vishysmoser: i like yours better19:54
vishysmoser: mind if i steal that part from your patch?19:54
smoseri don't mind.19:54
smoserplease take it.19:54
smoser:)19:54
*** hashar has joined #openstack-dev19:55
smoservishy, well, sort of threaded19:55
smosersurely there were more than 1 level in some of those threads19:55
vishysmoser:  actually, maybe i will just remove name mod to mine and let you put your patch in on top19:57
vishysmoser: I don't want to complicate the patch too much19:57
smoservishy, thats fine with me. mine would have been in if i wasn't having issue immeditely in writing a test case19:57
vishyi can help with the test case19:57
smoseri dont remmber what the problem was, ubt i was fighting it somehow. lack of experience.19:57
vishygimme a sec19:57
smoseryou helped me some with your insertion of that 'register_image' test19:58
*** mattray has joined #openstack-dev20:01
*** maplebed has quit IRC20:03
*** hattwick has quit IRC20:05
*** andrewsmedina_ has joined #openstack-dev20:05
*** andrewsmedina has quit IRC20:06
*** andrewsmedina_ is now known as andrewsmedina20:06
*** Ryan_Lane has joined #openstack-dev20:09
*** tr3buchet has quit IRC20:11
*** tr3buchet has joined #openstack-dev20:13
*** hattwick has joined #openstack-dev20:13
*** Ryan_Lane has quit IRC20:14
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-dev20:17
*** mnewby has quit IRC20:19
*** Ryan_Lane has joined #openstack-dev20:21
*** andrewsben has quit IRC20:24
*** PotHix has quit IRC20:27
vishysmoser: almost got the test done20:29
vishysmoser: going to lunch20:29
*** sandywalsh has quit IRC20:31
*** PotHix has joined #openstack-dev20:35
*** lts has quit IRC20:37
*** Ryan_Lane has quit IRC20:45
*** andrewsben has joined #openstack-dev20:48
*** maplebed has joined #openstack-dev20:51
*** armaan has joined #openstack-dev20:58
ayoungtermie, I uploaded another patch to https://review.openstack.org/#change,4725,  which still shows your "do not Submit" message.  THis new patch is rebased to origin/master,  so it takes into account the issues from the previous code review.20:58
*** andrewbogott_afk has quit IRC21:05
*** sandywalsh has joined #openstack-dev21:05
*** mnewby has joined #openstack-dev21:05
*** andrewbogott_ has joined #openstack-dev21:07
*** andrewbogott_ has joined #openstack-dev21:07
jaypipesjohan_-_: well said.21:10
*** eglynn has joined #openstack-dev21:10
*** mnewby has quit IRC21:12
*** Ryan_Lane has joined #openstack-dev21:18
*** adjohn has quit IRC21:20
*** andrewsben has quit IRC21:26
*** mnewby has joined #openstack-dev21:28
ohnoimdeadwho has the power to update the version of python-novaclient on pypi?21:31
*** Ryan_Lane has quit IRC21:32
*** Ryan_Lane1 has joined #openstack-dev21:32
*** Ryan_Lane1 is now known as Ryan_Lane21:32
*** Ryan_Lane has joined #openstack-dev21:32
*** mihgen has quit IRC21:33
*** flaviamissi has quit IRC21:34
*** milner has quit IRC21:35
jaypipestermie: ping21:35
jaypipesdtroyer, termie: by chance, do you know if this: http://wiki.openstack.org/CLIAuth is the most up-2-date docs on the "common CLI auth" stuff?21:36
dtroyerjaypipes: AFAIK it is, could use some additions though, like {service}_API_VERSION, but that isn't auth...21:37
jaypipesdtroyer: k, thx! just wanted to make sure.21:38
*** letterj has joined #openstack-dev21:39
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v letterj21:39
*** apevec has quit IRC21:41
*** dolphm has quit IRC21:43
*** markvoelker has quit IRC21:43
*** dprince has quit IRC21:52
*** armaan has left #openstack-dev21:53
*** andrewsmedina has quit IRC21:54
*** stuntmachine has quit IRC21:58
littleideawhat is Chris Behrens nick?22:01
johan_-_comstud22:03
*** bencherian has quit IRC22:05
comstudlittleidea: here22:07
littleideacomstud: this is Andrew22:08
*** hub-cap has joined #openstack-dev22:08
comstudlittleidea: hi :)22:08
comstudsaw your last comment22:08
littleideacomstud: think I should slice and dice the manager to pull those methods out of _schedule22:08
*** hub-cap has quit IRC22:08
comstudI'm definitely for it... we could go one of 2 ways..22:08
jaypipesblamar: id should not be able to be passed to bin/glance's add method starting in Essex. that is a bug in the documentation in bin/glance. Note that this was not the case in Diablo when we had integer image IDs.22:08
comstudif you want to get a quick fix in for prep_resize, i think you can just fix up the last comment i made22:09
comstudbut if you'd prefer for the longer solution.. I support that also22:09
comstudyou could either do it now or after getting the current fix in22:09
*** torgomatic has quit IRC22:10
littleideacomstud: broken gets fixed, shitty lives forever22:10
jaypipesblamar: so, it seems there is a bug in Glance that is allowing ID to be manually set if the location attribute is also set....22:10
jaypipesbcwaldon: hmm, ^^ is that on purpose? I thought we no longer allowed ID to be set manually?22:10
littleideacomstud: I'd lean towards breaking them out22:10
comstudlittleidea: yeah, although, it really bothers me so i suspect it'll get fixed soonish :)22:10
comstudok22:10
comstudi support it.. so if you want to give it a try, go for it22:10
*** hub_cap has quit IRC22:11
littleideacomstud: shouldn't be too bad, simpler than what is there in some regards22:11
comstudyes22:11
*** torgomatic has joined #openstack-dev22:11
littleideacomstud: k, that's what I'll do22:12
*** davlap has joined #openstack-dev22:13
*** cp16net has quit IRC22:16
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-dev22:16
*** adjohn has joined #openstack-dev22:16
annegentlehow do I set up an IRC channel just for one day? Thinking of a separate channel for DocDay, what do you think?22:18
russellbif you don't care much about configuring the channel, and just having a place to hang out and chat ... /join #openstack-docday ... that simple22:19
annegentlerussellb: ok, that's enough for the day, thanks22:25
russellbnp22:25
andrewbogott_I'm getting a 404 when python-novaapi contacts a nova extension.  That's almost certainly my fault (because I'm developing the extension.)  But... where is such traffic logged?  I was expecting to find it in my system apache2 access.log...  but, nope.22:26
russellbannegentle: oxygen hates me, heh.22:26
russellbit's all good, i can edit with something else.22:27
andrewbogott_(Nor is it in nova-api.log.)22:27
annegentlerussellb: sadness… we send them all kinds of bugs so if it's something we can help with let me know22:27
*** hashar has quit IRC22:29
*** kbringard has quit IRC22:31
mtaylorohnoimdead: I can ... is it that time again?22:39
ohnoimdeadmtaylor: would be awesome to update python-novaclient in pypi to e4 final22:43
*** gyee has quit IRC22:43
*** anotherjesse_zz is now known as anotherjesse23:00
anotherjesseannegentle: how does one go about become core on docs?23:00
vishysmoser: updated the tests: https://review.openstack.org/#change,402523:01
anotherjessejeblair / mtaylor: comments on https://review.openstack.org/4825 - the hope is making errors on gates easier to understand23:04
*** zzed has quit IRC23:05
jeblairanotherjesse: looking23:06
anotherjessejeblair: dtroyer is going to change the function name to die_if_error23:08
*** dolphm has quit IRC23:13
jeblairanotherjesse: i think it's great!23:13
*** thingee has quit IRC23:15
*** andrewsmedina has joined #openstack-dev23:16
anotherjessevishy: commented on s3token test - isn't it supposed to fail if the bucket exists?23:16
anotherjesse(euca-bundle stuff)23:16
vishyanotherjesse: i don't know23:17
vishyanotherjesse: no it shouldn't23:17
vishyanotherjesse: it should create the bucket if it doesn't exist23:17
anotherjessevishy: my memory is from 2+ years ago23:17
vishyanotherjesse: or use it if it does23:17
vishyanotherjesse: i just tested today upload bundle into the same bucket23:17
vishyso it definitely works23:17
vishy* yesterday23:17
anotherjessecool - I'll update my comment23:17
jeblairanotherjesse: on the subject of making the output more accessible to developers, i filed bug 94523123:18
uvirtbot`Launchpad bug 945231 in openstack-ci "screen output should be logged" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/94523123:18
anotherjessejeblair: NICE23:19
anotherjessemade it a HIGH23:19
jeblair:)23:19
vishytr3buchet: network related fix https://review.openstack.org/484523:21
dtroyeranotherjesse, jeblair : function rename complete on https://review.openstack.org/482523:21
*** torgomatic has quit IRC23:21
anotherjessedtroyer: +2'd23:22
*** stuntmachine has joined #openstack-dev23:25
*** BBLex has joined #openstack-dev23:25
*** eglynn_ has joined #openstack-dev23:29
*** eglynn has quit IRC23:31
*** Gordonz has quit IRC23:32
*** dolphm has joined #openstack-dev23:32
*** Ryan_Lane has quit IRC23:33
*** BBLex has left #openstack-dev23:33
*** mattray has quit IRC23:36
*** stuntmachine has quit IRC23:37
*** flaviamissi has joined #openstack-dev23:54
*** dtroyer has quit IRC23:55
*** flaviamissi has quit IRC23:58
*** dolphm has quit IRC23:58
*** flaviamissi has joined #openstack-dev23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.14.0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!