*** munimeha1 has quit IRC | 00:06 | |
*** xinran__ has joined #openstack-cyborg | 01:07 | |
*** xinran__ has left #openstack-cyborg | 01:10 | |
*** xinranwang has joined #openstack-cyborg | 01:16 | |
*** xinranwang has quit IRC | 01:27 | |
*** xinranwang has joined #openstack-cyborg | 01:27 | |
*** Yumeng_ has joined #openstack-cyborg | 01:40 | |
*** Coco_gao has joined #openstack-cyborg | 02:00 | |
Coco_gao | Hi all | 02:02 |
---|---|---|
Yumeng_ | hi | 02:04 |
Coco_gao | Good morning, Yumeng | 02:04 |
Yumeng_ | morning coco, about this story https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2004248 | 02:07 |
Yumeng_ | Could you email this doc to me? https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XLQtvyGJeEgo3ztBQiufWLF-E7S7yGLaYrme8iUPtA0/edit#heading=h.dllo7olmuhb | 02:07 |
Yumeng_ | I cannot access to this in my company :((((( | 02:10 |
Coco_gao | done | 02:11 |
Yumeng_ | cool got! | 02:15 |
Yumeng_ | coco, Among all these tasks in this story https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2004248 which task do you think should be the next one to be implemented? | 02:20 |
Coco_gao | This will be implemented together. | 02:24 |
Coco_gao | If you have time, maybe you can join Sundar for the cyborg client. | 02:25 |
Coco_gao | The remaining tasks in the list may owned by zhenghao. | 02:27 |
Coco_gao | Or, you can talk with him. | 02:27 |
Yumeng_ | ok, no pb. if he was busy I can help | 02:33 |
Coco_gao | By the way, what's new time for the IRC meeting? | 02:41 |
Yumeng_ | haha 11:00 | 02:47 |
Yumeng_ | I also thought it was 10:00. | 02:49 |
*** Li_Liu has joined #openstack-cyborg | 02:53 | |
*** Sundar has joined #openstack-cyborg | 02:59 | |
Li_Liu | Hi Sundar | 03:01 |
Sundar | Hi Li | 03:01 |
Li_Liu | Let's wait for others | 03:01 |
Sundar | Sure | 03:01 |
*** chohoor has joined #openstack-cyborg | 03:01 | |
Li_Liu | maybe wait for another 3 mins | 03:02 |
Yumeng_ | hi Sundar Li :) | 03:02 |
Li_Liu | Hi Yumeng :) | 03:03 |
jiapei | o/ | 03:04 |
*** HongboZhao has joined #openstack-cyborg | 03:04 | |
xinranwang | Hi all | 03:04 |
Sundar | Hi Yumeng_ and all | 03:04 |
Li_Liu | #startmeeting openstack-cyborg | 03:05 |
openstack | Meeting started Wed Dec 12 03:05:38 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Li_Liu. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 03:05 |
openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 03:05 |
*** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: openstack-cyborg)" | 03:05 | |
openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_cyborg' | 03:05 |
Li_Liu | #topic Roll Call | 03:05 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Roll Call (Meeting topic: openstack-cyborg)" | 03:05 | |
Li_Liu | #info Li_Liu | 03:05 |
Li_Liu | Let's get started | 03:06 |
xinranwang | #info xinranwang | 03:06 |
Sundar | #info Sundar | 03:06 |
Li_Liu | I hope the new time slot works better for most of the people | 03:06 |
Li_Liu | #topic status updates | 03:07 |
*** openstack changes topic to "status updates (Meeting topic: openstack-cyborg)" | 03:07 | |
Yumeng_ | # info Yumeng_ | 03:07 |
Li_Liu | Sundar, what's new on your side? | 03:07 |
Sundar | The feature branches for CYborg and its client have been created. Will be submitting code for a prorotype that shows how Nova could call into CYborg | 03:08 |
Li_Liu | that's great. So would help push the Nova-Cyborg interaction spec right? | 03:09 |
Sundar | This is intended to show developers how the interaction in the spec will play out in practice | 03:09 |
Sundar | I hope so :) | 03:09 |
Li_Liu | Once created, let's find some time to talk with Nova folks directly | 03:10 |
Li_Liu | let's push together | 03:10 |
Li_Liu | xinrangwang, anything you wanna share? | 03:10 |
Sundar | I also need to develop and push the Nova patches that do the actual invocation | 03:10 |
Li_Liu | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/624340/ | 03:10 |
Li_Liu | xinranwang, is that one ready to be reviewed? | 03:11 |
Li_Liu | Sundar, maybe we can show them how it should work first? | 03:12 |
xinranwang | Li_Liu: nope, it depends on the DB schemas the ovo object | 03:12 |
xinranwang | it's just the initial version | 03:13 |
Li_Liu | xinranwang, the spec should be ready anytime, does it also depends on Coco/zhenghao's work? | 03:13 |
Sundar | Li_Liu: Yes, the pilot code for Cyborg and its client will be submitted first. | 03:14 |
Li_Liu | great | 03:15 |
xinranwang | yes, because the input param for conductor is ovo object | 03:16 |
Li_Liu | Sundar, I think https://review.openstack.org/#/c/615462/ can be merged | 03:16 |
Li_Liu | xinranwang, ok\ | 03:17 |
xinranwang | Li_Liu: Btw, I have submitted our POC code with workflow -1 | 03:17 |
Li_Liu | xinranwang, right, understand | 03:17 |
Li_Liu | thanks a lot for the work | 03:17 |
Sundar | Li_Liu: The db spec has progressed a lot. Only a couple of points left, which you wanted to address offline. I replied by email about half hour ago. | 03:18 |
Coco_gao | I received you email | 03:18 |
Li_Liu | Sundar, I saw that one, I think i address them in my patch already | 03:19 |
Yumeng_ | Sundar, for tasks in Client and DB https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2004248. which one has a higher priority currently? | 03:19 |
Coco_gao | I will update the OVO object patch as well as submmit New DB patch. | 03:19 |
Li_Liu | Coco_gao, are you gonna work on the DB object based on the new db spec? | 03:19 |
xinranwang | Coco_gao: I can take over the diff part in conductor if you don't have enough time :) | 03:20 |
Coco_gao | Yes. | 03:20 |
Coco_gao | Li | 03:21 |
Sundar | The table currently named ARQ actually has ExtARQ data, since it includes Cyborg-private fields. That's why I said the table is better named as ExtARQ. ExtARQ is a superset of ARQ | 03:21 |
Li_Liu | that seems a lot of work, you might wanna offload them | 03:21 |
Coco_gao | xinran, I have the diff function in the old ovo patch, so it won't take long if the db object is ready. | 03:22 |
Li_Liu | Sundar, you mean there will not be a ARQ table then. only ExtARQ | 03:22 |
Sundar | Li_Liu: Yes | 03:22 |
Coco_gao | Li, I think the ExtARQ combines old ARQ and ExtARQ | 03:22 |
Li_Liu | ok, I will make the change right now | 03:23 |
*** Helloway has joined #openstack-cyborg | 03:23 | |
Sundar | Li_Liu: Thanks | 03:23 |
Sundar | For the question of whether attach handles go with deployables or devices, one could argue both ways but I thought it is easier if it goes at the device level. if we want to keep it in the current form, it may require an upgrade later. As long we are all ok with that, I am fine | 03:24 |
Coco_gao | Li_Liu, I will implement table device and deployable and attribute. Other DB work might owned by zhenghao or anyone else? | 03:24 |
Sundar | Coco_gao: It may make sense to split the db work, since there are so many. Thanks for suggesting that. | 03:24 |
Li_Liu | Coco_gao, I will talk with zheng hao and xinran for the work load | 03:24 |
Yumeng_ | coco I have can help | 03:25 |
Coco_gao | OK, you can discuss with zhenghao about other DB works. | 03:25 |
xinranwang | Coco_gao: ok, this patch is an initial version of conductor update, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/624340/, plz review it to see if it fits your requirements. It need more functions to be implemented. | 03:25 |
Coco_gao | Thanks, Yumeng_ | 03:25 |
Li_Liu | Sundar, I kinda lean towards let attachHandle reference to Device now | 03:25 |
Coco_gao | #info Coco_gao | 03:25 |
Sundar | Li_Liu: OK :) It is all a bit hypothetical because the devices in Stein train frame will work fine either way. | 03:26 |
Sundar | BTW, even if we put in device level, we have to figure out how to handle a PCI card wih 2 FPGAs, if that ever becomes a thing | 03:27 |
Li_Liu | sure | 03:27 |
Coco_gao | xinranwang, I will check your patch, thank you. | 03:28 |
Li_Liu | ok, I think it's great we can finalize the spec and can push things further | 03:28 |
Li_Liu | #topic AoB | 03:29 |
*** openstack changes topic to "AoB (Meeting topic: openstack-cyborg)" | 03:29 | |
Li_Liu | On top of what we have discussed, do you guys have anything to add? | 03:29 |
xinranwang | Sundar: do you have any concern about the POC code I put in the community? | 03:30 |
Coco_gao | Sundar, You mean that cyborg client code is ready? | 03:30 |
Sundar | xinranwang: My main concern is this is an outdated poc, and it may cause confusion. | 03:31 |
Sundar | Coco_gao: I have made some changes to Cyborg client too. I will put that on a feature branch too. But it is still WIP | 03:31 |
Coco_gao | or we still need other one to implement that? | 03:31 |
xinranwang | Sundar: I understand your concern, it should be clarified to nova that these patches is for reference only | 03:32 |
Sundar | BTW, clarification: The prototype is not the final code. There will be many TODOs. Our developers are free to re-implement, or fill the gaps while leveraging the prototype | 03:32 |
Coco_gao | Yes , I think so. | 03:33 |
Sundar | Coco_gao, Zhenghao and possibly Yumeng_ are working on the db. Xinran is working on the agent/conductor API and the diff. Is that correct? | 03:34 |
*** Helloway has quit IRC | 03:34 | |
Li_Liu | Sundar I think so | 03:34 |
Yumeng_ | Sundar: yes, next time please also email me(bao.yumeng@zte.com.cn) if there is any update about the specificaiton :) | 03:35 |
Coco_gao | Or add yumeng to the reviewer. | 03:35 |
Sundar | Yumeng_: Sure :) Thanks for helping! | 03:35 |
Li_Liu | We did not have you before? Yumeng_ | 03:35 |
Li_Liu | We will in the future | 03:35 |
Coco_gao | That's great | 03:36 |
Yumeng_ | not yet before. great! :) | 03:36 |
Li_Liu | :) | 03:36 |
Li_Liu | ok, I think we can wrap up for today | 03:36 |
Sundar | We have tons more things to do. Like new v2 APIs, checking that v1 APIs srtill work, adding tempest tests, .... | 03:36 |
Li_Liu | oh yes, gonna be a fun 2019 | 03:36 |
Sundar | Can we identify owners for that? I propose that Xinran and I can work on the APIs? | 03:37 |
Li_Liu | sure | 03:37 |
Sundar | xinranwang: I think you have worked with pecan layer before. Are you fine with that? | 03:37 |
Coco_gao | OK, we can identify the owner now. | 03:38 |
Sundar | Do we have some developers to check rolling upgrades from Rocky to Stein? The v1 APIs should return null result in Stein, I think | 03:39 |
Sundar | For e.g. list deployables will return [] | 03:39 |
Sundar | Silence ... Shall we take this up next week? | 03:41 |
Yumeng_ | Sundar: did you notice this patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/619997/ | 03:42 |
Coco_gao | I can list deployables in my previous POC. | 03:42 |
Li_Liu | Sundar, I guess we can come up with a complete list first | 03:42 |
xinranwang | Sundar: Yes, I can work with you on Cyborg-Nova API side | 03:42 |
Coco_gao | Have you got authenticated before asking. | 03:43 |
Sundar | Yumeng_: We are dropping the accelerators table in Stein. So this API should be modified to return [] all the time in Stein? | 03:44 |
Yumeng_ | I made this change in v1 APIs to avoid returns null for the situation where we actually have accelerators | 03:44 |
Sundar | Yumeng_: is anybody using Cyborg today, and therefore relying on tv1 he API? | 03:45 |
Sundar | *the v1 API | 03:46 |
Li_Liu | I don't think anyone is using cyborg | 03:46 |
Sundar | Li_Liu: OK, we can form that task list by next meeting | 03:46 |
Li_Liu | Sundar, we can talk on zoom in case you need it | 03:47 |
Sundar | Sure | 03:48 |
Coco_gao | I can get the deployable list, I also have the test code if you need that. | 03:48 |
Yumeng_ | Sundar,Li liu: ok, maybe next meeting. I will dig more to discuss with you guys. | 03:48 |
Coco_gao | Anyway, let's arrange other meething. | 03:48 |
Li_Liu | ok | 03:49 |
Li_Liu | can we wrap up? I think it's almost lunch time for china folks :P | 03:50 |
Coco_gao | Yes, It's time for lunch, bye. | 03:50 |
Li_Liu | #endmeeting | 03:50 |
*** openstack changes topic to "Pending patches (Meeting topic: openstack-cyborg)" | 03:50 | |
openstack | Meeting ended Wed Dec 12 03:50:50 2018 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 03:50 |
Yumeng_ | see you guys | 03:50 |
openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_cyborg/2018/openstack_cyborg.2018-12-12-03.05.html | 03:50 |
openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_cyborg/2018/openstack_cyborg.2018-12-12-03.05.txt | 03:50 |
Li_Liu | have a good day/night | 03:50 |
openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_cyborg/2018/openstack_cyborg.2018-12-12-03.05.log.html | 03:50 |
*** Sundar has quit IRC | 03:53 | |
*** Li_Liu has quit IRC | 03:55 | |
openstackgerrit | Li Liu proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Added initial draft for new DB model https://review.openstack.org/615462 | 03:55 |
*** chohoor has left #openstack-cyborg | 04:27 | |
*** HongboZhao has quit IRC | 05:16 | |
*** HongboZhao has joined #openstack-cyborg | 05:16 | |
*** HongboZhao has quit IRC | 05:21 | |
openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/cyborg master: Checked in README for the pilot branch. https://review.openstack.org/624576 | 05:32 |
openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/cyborg master: Main changes for the db layer. https://review.openstack.org/624577 | 05:32 |
*** Coco_gao has quit IRC | 06:00 | |
*** Yumeng_ has quit IRC | 07:02 | |
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 07:29 | |
*** sum12 has quit IRC | 07:35 | |
*** sum12 has joined #openstack-cyborg | 07:37 | |
*** helenafm has joined #openstack-cyborg | 08:25 | |
*** sum12 has quit IRC | 11:18 | |
*** sum12 has joined #openstack-cyborg | 11:19 | |
*** sum12 has quit IRC | 11:19 | |
*** sum12 has joined #openstack-cyborg | 11:20 | |
*** irclogbot_0 has quit IRC | 14:36 | |
*** irclogbot_0 has joined #openstack-cyborg | 14:51 | |
*** sum12 has quit IRC | 15:28 | |
*** sum12 has joined #openstack-cyborg | 15:28 | |
*** helenafm has quit IRC | 17:08 | |
*** Sundar has joined #openstack-cyborg | 19:11 | |
*** Sundar has quit IRC | 19:49 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!