Tuesday, 2023-07-04

caiqilongakawai: hi, i am a contributer as you. if the zuul gives -1 to your review, you could check the result and make modification if the failed result is due to your driver coder01:03
caiqilongcode01:04
caiqilongakawai: after you proposed you patch, the ZUUL CI need time to run tests, after that, it could give you +1 or -1 result.01:05
caiqilongakawai: you cold get a real time viewing about your ZUUL tasks at: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/status01:06
caiqilongakawai: your patch could not be merged without +1 by Zuul test01:07
akawaicaiqilong: Thank you for your reply. The URL is very useful.01:16
akawaicaiqilong: But my asking is : I would like to run Zuul test for my patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/885986, but the test has never been run automatically and manually(e.g. recheck command) on the patch. I guess the cause is that my patch does not have the reviewer "Zuul". Do you know what   to do?01:24
caiqilongakawai: it seems you patch trigger a task queued in ZUUl, Generally, the manually trigger way is just leave a comment "recheck"01:31
caiqilongakawai: if it doesn't work, maybe you should ask core reviews for further solutions.01:32
akawaicaiqilong: Thanks.01:33
caiqilongakawai: you do not need to add reviewer ZUUL manually01:33
caiqilongakawai: it will be auto added once it report a result01:34
caiqilongthe key problem is your patch can't trigger into ZUUL at https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/status01:35
akawaicaiqilong: I see.01:37
opendevreviewcaiqilong proposed openstack/cinder master: Add Cinder driver for TOYOU NetStor TYDS  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/88694202:43
Supriya_KotwalHi Sofia Enriquez- I have update commit message for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/886612/. It will be very great and helpful for us if you all review it again. Sean McGinnis reviewed yesterday.05:22
opendevreviewcaiqilong proposed openstack/cinder master: Add Cinder driver for TOYOU NetStor TYDS  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/88694207:26
opendevreviewBiser Milanov proposed openstack/os-brick master: storpool.py: Use StorPool's API for Attach/Detach  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/88757508:31
opendevreviewBiser Milanov proposed openstack/os-brick master: StorPool: Raise on spopenstack, SP_OURID issues  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/88757608:31
opendevreviewVladislav Belogrudov proposed openstack/cinder master: Tatlin unified driver - rename tatlin_api object  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/88757808:35
opendevreviewVladislav Belogrudov proposed openstack/cinder master: Tatlin unified driver - rename tatlin_api object  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/88757808:50
opendevreviewVladislav Belogrudov proposed openstack/cinder master: Tatlin unified driver - rename tatlin_api object  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/88758608:53
opendevreviewVladislav Belogrudov proposed openstack/cinder master: Tatlin unified driver - rename tatlin_api object  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/88758708:55
opendevreviewVladislav Belogrudov proposed openstack/cinder master: Tatlin unified driver - rename tatlin_api object  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/88758809:12
opendevreviewVladislav Belogrudov proposed openstack/cinder master: Tatlin unified driver - rename tatlin_api object  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/88758909:13
opendevreviewVladislav Belogrudov proposed openstack/cinder master: Tatlin unified driver - rename tatlin_api object  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/86249009:26
opendevreviewVladislav Belogrudov proposed openstack/cinder master: Fix temp volume project id for Tatlin storage  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/85829309:29
opendevreviewVladislav Belogrudov proposed openstack/cinder master: Tatlin Unified driver - remove unused code  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/86248910:16
sfv880_Hello reviewers, could you please review backports https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/886067 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/886141 ? Thank you very much!11:58
chris218Hi, sorry to bother you but wanted to ask for your recommendations regarding openstack setup with slow networking.12:06
chris218I'm setting up small openstack installation with 3 low powered nodes which only have single 1gig ethernet and from what I've read so far people discourage using ceph with only 1G networking12:07
chris218(it's mostly homelab/for learning purposes)12:07
*** chuanm3 is now known as chuanm13:40
admin1chris218, you can use nfs or iscsi/lvm directly .. so that yuo save the bandwidth on the 1gbit for the 3x replication 17:15
opendevreviewMerged openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin master: Test srbac on backups  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin/+/87858717:18
chris218So like without using ceph at all?17:19
toskyyes! (cinder-tempest-plugin)17:25
admin1as far as openstack (cinder) is concerned, ceph is just one of the backend which is abstracted/hidden to the user by cinder 17:27
chris218Awesome thanks for help17:29

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!