Wednesday, 2023-03-01

whoami-rajatrosmaita, hey, if you're still around can you take a look at this backport? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/82173901:06
whoami-rajatwe can ask them to update the patch but if you're OK with as it01:07
opendevreviewAtsushi Kawai proposed openstack/cinder master: Follow up: Hitachi and OEM: Update documents  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/87568102:37
opendevreviewAtsushi Kawai proposed openstack/cinder master: Follow up: Hitachi and OEM: Update documents  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/87568102:40
TusharTgitewhoami-rajat: hi could you review this patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/86020903:31
opendevreviewEric Harney proposed openstack/cinder master: test_rbd_iscsi: Make tests compatible with python 3.11  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/86939604:14
opendevreviewMerged openstack/cinder stable/xena: PowerMax Driver - Get manageable volumes fix  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/82173904:44
opendevreviewKumar Kanishka proposed openstack/cinder master: [SVf] Invalid Exception raised due to invalid portset value  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/87463304:57
opendevreviewKumar Kanishka proposed openstack/cinder master: [SVf] Invalid Exception raised due to invalid portset value  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/87463305:09
opendevreviewKumar Kanishka proposed openstack/cinder master: [IBM-Storwize-SVf] Invalid Exception raised due to invalid portset value  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/87463306:38
opendevreviewAtsushi Kawai proposed openstack/cinder master: Follow up: Hitachi: Change option name `hitachi_pool` to `hitachi_pools`  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/87560308:26
opendevreviewMerged openstack/cinder master: Tests: Fix typo'd unit test name  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/86503509:49
opendevreviewTushar Trambak Gite proposed openstack/cinder master: Include volume type constraints in internal API  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/84614611:10
opendevreviewTushar Trambak Gite proposed openstack/cinder master: Delete volume and cloned-volume concurrently  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/84330911:10
*** chuanm6 is now known as chuanm11:26
opendevreviewHarsh Ailani proposed openstack/cinder master: [SVf] : Enable support for mirror-pool option for replication volume-type  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/87000612:32
opendevreviewPeter Penchev proposed openstack/cinder master: Add the clone_across_pools driver capability  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/84713112:49
opendevreviewPeter Penchev proposed openstack/cinder master: StorPool: declare the clone_across_pools capability  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/84713212:49
opendevreviewPeter Penchev proposed openstack/cinder master: StorPool: cosmetic: comment headings instead of empty lines  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/87350712:49
opendevreviewPeter Penchev proposed openstack/cinder master: StorPool: drop _attach_volume() and _detach_volume()  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/78729612:49
opendevreviewPeter Penchev proposed openstack/cinder master: StorPool driver: remove the obsolete backup_volume()  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/80382312:49
opendevreviewPeter Penchev proposed openstack/cinder master: StorPool: drop copy_image_to_volume() and copy_volume_to_image()  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/87055012:49
opendevreviewPeter Penchev proposed openstack/cinder master: StorPool: fix the "rename volume" unit test emulation  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/87068112:49
opendevreviewPeter Penchev proposed openstack/cinder master: StorPool: fix the retype volume flow  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/87055112:49
opendevreviewPeter Penchev proposed openstack/cinder master: StorPool: create_cloned_volume() improvements  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/84327712:49
opendevreviewPeter Penchev proposed openstack/cinder master: Add iSCSI export support to the StorPool driver  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/84753612:49
Roamer`...so I'd just like to point out that even though the very last change in this queue is a new driver feature, the other nine are more or less trivial bugfixes, some of which are sorely needed... and we deploy all of them at customers' sites, and our CI system applies most of them before running each test12:50
toskygeguileo: so, do you want me to fold https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin/+/870889 inside https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin/+/855576? Should we keep both jobs? I forgot what we agreed (if we agreed on something)13:28
geguileotosky: iirc in order to reduce the number of jobs we agreed that the latest patch was the most relevant, since it tested the more complex code (shared targets + multipathing + new connection information format)13:31
toskygeguileo: oook, as the based job definition is in the first patch, do you want to me to just update the first one with the additional options and call the resulting job "the" nvme job?13:32
geguileotosky: sounds good to me13:32
toskyuhm, it's probably easier to just use your patch instead13:34
opendevreviewLuigi Toscano proposed openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin master: zuul: new LVM/nvmet job (relevant scenario)  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-tempest-plugin/+/87088913:43
opendevreviewAtsushi Kawai proposed openstack/cinder master: Follow up: Hitachi: Change option name `hitachi_pool` to `hitachi_pools`  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/87560313:58
whoami-rajatCinder meeting in #openstack-meeting-alt at 1400 UTC14:00
whoami-rajatjungleboyj rosmaita smcginnis tosky whoami-rajat m5z e0ne geguileo eharney walshh_ jbernard sfernand enriquetaso hemna fabiooliveira yuval tobias-urdin adiare happystacker dosaboy14:00
opendevreviewAtsushi Kawai proposed openstack/cinder master: Follow up: Hitachi and OEM: Update documents  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/87568114:13
enriquetaso#startmeeting cinder_bs15:01
opendevmeetMeeting started Wed Mar  1 15:01:22 2023 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is enriquetaso. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:01
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:01
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'cinder_bs'15:01
enriquetasoHello, Welcome to the Bug meeting15:01
enriquetasoOnly 3 bugs reported 15:01
enriquetaso#link https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-March/032516.html15:01
enriquetaso#topic Volume multiattach exposed to non-admin users via API15:02
enriquetasoWe discussed this bug on the main meeting, so please check the logs:15:02
enriquetaso#link https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder/2023/cinder.2023-03-01-14.00.log.html#l-5315:03
enriquetasoand please review Rajat's patches!15:03
enriquetaso#link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/87486515:03
enriquetasoMoving on15:04
enriquetaso#topic image_utils: code hardening around decompression15:04
enriquetaso#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/200842915:04
enriquetasorosmaita, talked about it in last week video meeting15:05
rosmaitai think i tagged it low hanging fruit15:05
enriquetasoIt's a low-hanging-fruit bug so hopefully some potential intern may work on it15:05
rosmaita:)15:05
enriquetasobut anyone can work on it!15:06
enriquetasothanks rosmaita 15:06
Tony_SaadHey, is it worth mentioning again our Antelope Dell driver bugs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/768105 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/797970 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/821739 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/85837015:06
enriquetasoi see you are spanning any meeting you can :P15:07
enriquetasoremember to review Dell patches ^15:08
Tony_Saadthis is the first time I join this meeting haha I dont know which is best to bring up the topic15:08
enriquetasoOne is already merged tho, and the last one.. i would like to see and update on the sean comment15:08
Tony_Saadthanks! 15:09
enriquetasonp15:09
enriquetasoLast bug15:09
enriquetaso#topic [yadro] tatlin_client is_port_assigned method broken15:10
enriquetaso#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/200873515:10
enriquetasoNo patch proposed to master yet15:10
enriquetasoI dont know if anyone from yadro would like to say something here15:10
eharneymore evidence that we still benefit from pylint ^15:10
enriquetasotrue, we should make openstack-tox-pylint work again 15:12
eharneyi'm working on it, need reviews on patches like https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/87128915:12
enriquetaso++15:15
enriquetasothanks eharney for working on this15:16
enriquetaso#topic open discussion 15:16
enriquetasoFeel free to proposed any bug report or bug now15:16
enriquetasoI see https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/871286 is also related to pylint, maybe we can tag them or something to keep it track together 15:17
eharneythat one is more complex, pylint seems to be very broken on 3.10 and 3.11 for us, still figuring that out15:17
eharneyalso, thanks for reviewing my 3.11 unit test fixes... one of them failed in the unit test gate and i have to figure out why15:18
enriquetaso:(15:19
enriquetasothanks to you eharney 15:20
eharneyunfortunately i can't run tox unit tests locally today... anyone else hit that?15:20
eharneyerror: Multiple top-level packages discovered in a flat-layout: ['etc', 'roles', 'cinder', 'playbooks', 'releasenotes'].15:20
enriquetasoTo be honest, I'm not able to deploy devstack in general.. `tox -e py3` returns `ERROR: Could not install packages due to an OSError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: 'RECORD'`15:23
eharneythis fails for me with just a cinder clone and running any tox env (tox using 3.11)15:24
eharneyuhy15:24
enriquetasooh true `ERROR: could not install deps [virtualenv>=20.17.1, tox >= 4.0.0]; v = InvocationError("/usr/bin/python -m pip install 15:24
enriquetaso'virtualenv>=20.17.1' 'tox >= 4.0.0'", 1)`15:24
enriquetasogod15:24
enriquetasoi'm using tox 3.2815:25
eharneyi don't think it's tox itself15:26
eharneythe error is coming from setuptools15:26
rosmaitajeez ... you may want to change your tox.ini to tox<4.0.0 and see what happens15:27
opendevreviewEric Harney proposed openstack/cinder master: Set packages in setup.cfg  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/87593915:29
eharneyrosmaita: this fixes it for me  ^15:29
eharneydunno if it's correct though, just a quick pass..15:29
eharneyanyway i guess we can end the bug meeting15:30
enriquetasoyes15:30
enriquetasothanks you! 15:30
enriquetasoI'll try both things15:30
enriquetaso#endmeeting15:30
opendevmeetMeeting ended Wed Mar  1 15:30:39 2023 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:30
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder_bs/2023/cinder_bs.2023-03-01-15.01.html15:30
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder_bs/2023/cinder_bs.2023-03-01-15.01.txt15:30
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder_bs/2023/cinder_bs.2023-03-01-15.01.log.html15:30
opendevreviewVladislav Belogrudov proposed openstack/cinder master: Fix temp volume project id for Tatlin storage  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/85829316:30
opendevreviewVladislav Belogrudov proposed openstack/cinder master: Tatlin Unified driver - remove unused code  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/86248916:31
opendevreviewVladislav Belogrudov proposed openstack/cinder master: Tatlin unified driver - rename tatlin_api object  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/86249016:31
gmannrosmaita: whoami-rajat : on multiattach things ,  read the meeting discussion but just replying /continue here. please help me to understand. so if multiattach and VT is passed together I think it is valid to return 400 and ask users to request one way17:01
rosmaitagmann: was just going to reply on the ML17:02
gmannbut if anyone existing users passing only multiattach=True in request, does request/operation is successful ?17:02
gmannrosmaita: k17:02
rosmaitagmann: https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2023-March/032530.html17:03
gmannI am just considering tempest test case where multiattach=True in request is successful  case. 17:03
rosmaitawell, the problem is that tempest just does the attach, then does a teardown17:03
rosmaitatempest doesn't care if the data gets corrupted or something17:04
rosmaita(it's not tempest's job)17:04
gmannohk so it is not sully tested till the issue happen17:04
gmannfully17:04
rosmaitayeah, and you can get lucky and not have any problem17:04
rosmaitabut in general, mutltiattach should depend on the volume type17:05
gmannrosmaita: whoami-rajat: replied on ML, if this is always unsuccessful (unknown successful ) operation as whole, I agree not to microversion which I think you can only confirm. My and tempest test knowledge is limited for this operation. 17:21
rosmaitagmann: thanks17:22
opendevreviewEric Harney proposed openstack/cinder master: RBD: Skip update_features when features = 0  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/86585518:15
opendevreviewEric Harney proposed openstack/cinder master: RBD: Skip update_features when features = 0  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/86585518:15
opendevreviewEric Harney proposed openstack/cinder master: Hitachi HBSD: Fix invalid "raise None"  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/87597718:42
opendevreviewAndrei proposed openstack/cinder master: JovianDSS: improve storage net ifc picking alg  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/86243219:54
opendevreviewTony Saad proposed openstack/cinder master: PowerMax Driver - RDF checks  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/76810520:50

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!