Tuesday, 2022-12-06

*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|out00:28
*** abdi_ is now known as abdi01:37
*** geguileo is now known as Guest108002:14
opendevreviewXuQi proposed openstack/cinder master: Fujitsu Driver: Add manage related support  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/85117002:51
*** akekane is now known as abhishekk05:36
opendevreviewXuQi proposed openstack/cinder master: Fujitsu Driver: Add manage related support  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/85117009:37
*** dviroel|out is now known as dviroel11:12
*** Guest1080 is now known as geguileo11:29
*** akekane is now known as abhishekk14:05
opendevreviewKonrad Gube proposed openstack/cinder-specs master: Add extend volume completion action  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/86671814:11
kgubewhoami-rajat: regarding the attached resize for NFS, I have decided to propose an alternative spec, proposing a new volume action in Cinder for async feedback from Nova14:15
kgubewhoami-rajat: because Nova reviewers were not convinced of the synchronous API14:16
tobias-urdinwhoami-rajat: can u check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/864701 when you have some time available, thanks!14:24
opendevreviewKonrad Gube proposed openstack/cinder-specs master: Add extend volume completion action  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/86671814:33
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|lunch15:31
*** dviroel|lunch is now known as dviroel16:34
opendevreviewRajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/cinder master: nit: correct comment in backup manager  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/86678817:46
whoami-rajatkgube, that's a bummer but luckily we already have the async approach in alternatives17:50
whoami-rajattobias-urdin, hey, can you answer my query on the patch, just want to be sure we are backporting the right fix and not missing anything17:51
kgubewhoami-rajat, I already submitted it as a new spec: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/86671817:57
kgubethough it probably would have been better to rewrite the existing one17:57
whoami-rajatkgube, i prefer to keep history of all the discussion but not sure how much relevant it is in this case17:59
whoami-rajatalso we've reference to original specs so it should be good17:59
whoami-rajatrosmaita, what do you think ^18:00
rosmaitalooking18:05
rosmaitawhoami-rajat: kgube: i think in this case, it's fine to have a different spec ... you have a reference to the old one in case anyone's interested, but since you are going in a different direction, i think it makes sense to keep the discussion focused on your new approach18:13
whoami-rajatrosmaita, thanks for taking a look18:13
rosmaitanp18:13
whoami-rajatkgube, so the new spec looks good, I will take a look18:13
kgubewhoami-rajat, rosmaita thanks!18:14
whoami-rajatkgube, just to be on the safe side, nova team does agree with the new approach right? so we don't end up reviewing again something that they don't approve of18:15
kgubeI still need to submit the new nova-spec18:16
kgubeor rather, sean mooney has suggested that I rewrite the existing one if we are not adding the new API18:18
kgubewhoami-rajat, I will try to get this done till tomorrow18:19
kgubewhoami-rajat, they have not given me a lot of feedback on the direction18:20
whoami-rajatkgube, ack18:51
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|biab19:48
abdiiekhgbneltrf20:11
*** marlinc is now known as Guest115920:50
*** marlinc is now known as Guest116822:14
*** marlinc is now known as Guest117323:32

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!