Wednesday, 2021-07-07

opendevreviewXuan Yandong proposed openstack/cinder-specs master: Support revert any snapshot to the volume  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder-specs/+/73611103:21
*** abhishekk is now known as akekane|home05:26
*** akekane|home is now known as abhishekk05:26
opendevreviewTushar Trambak Gite proposed openstack/cinder master: Dropping explicit unicode literal  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/79963107:39
*** bhagyashris_ is now known as bhagyashris|ruck08:37
*** whoami-rajat is now known as Guest8909:05
*** whoami-rajat__ is now known as whoami-rajat09:05
opendevreviewHelen Walsh proposed openstack/cinder master: PowerMax Driver - Improve error handling around deletes  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/79628611:18
opendevreviewRajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/cinder master: Add user messages for backup operations  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/78662712:02
opendevreviewRajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/cinder master: Add user message for revert to snapshot  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/79220912:02
opendevreviewRajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/cinder master: Add user messages for volume operations  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/79351512:02
opendevreviewRajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/cinder master: Add user messages for backup operations  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/78662712:07
opendevreviewRajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/cinder master: Add user message for revert to snapshot  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/79220912:08
opendevreviewRajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/cinder master: Add user messages for volume operations  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/79351512:08
opendevreviewRajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/cinder master: WIP: Add user messages for volume group  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/79979912:25
opendevreviewWalt proposed openstack/cinder master: Fix message confusion during backup restore  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/79982113:16
hemnaI'm seeing a case where I'm having initialize_connection getting called when the volume is in creating status.  (this is during restore from backup)13:18
hemnaI can't seem to find where that exists in code13:18
hemnaalso fwiw I think I found a minor issue with the cinder create --backup-id <id> flow13:34
hemnathe task flow manager tries to use backend assisted restore from backup, which almost no drivers implement, and then falls back to creating a raw volume, then calls backup to restore.13:35
hemnathe volume is left in 'creating' status during the rpc call to the backup manager13:35
hemnaI think that should be set to restoring backup13:35
hemnasince the volume has been created on the backend correctly, and is now going to be restored13:36
hemnaright here: https://github.com/openstack/cinder/blob/master/cinder/volume/flows/manager/create_volume.py#L105913:36
rosmaitaCourtesy reminder: Cinder meeting in #openstack-meeting-alt at 1400 UTC13:59
rosmaitajungleboyj rosmaita smcginnis tosky whoami-rajat m5z e0ne geguileo eharney walshh_ jbernard lseki sfernand rajinir enriquetaso hemna ^^13:59
*** bhagyashris is now known as bhagyashris|ruck13:59
whoami-rajatthanks rosmaita 14:00
geguileorosmaita: thanks14:00
enriquetasothanks14:00
rosmaitahappy to be of service!14:00
*** bhagyashris_ is now known as bhagyashris|ruck14:24
opendevreviewGorka Eguileor proposed openstack/cinder master: NFS: Update connection info on online snap create  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/79984314:27
geguileolyarwood: Thanks for your help with the NFS case!!  I have proposed the fix to cinder https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/79984314:50
lyarwoodgeguileo: ack np thanks, I'll review after my next call14:58
geguileolyarwood: thanks :-)14:58
geguileoeharney: I was wondering if we should add a user message15:02
eharneygeguileo: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/789602 causes volume creation to throw sensible errors instead of nasty errors at the volume service when an encryption spec was not created in a correct format15:02
eharneygeguileo: don't need one, because the second patch will reject invalid encryption specs at the API15:02
enriquetasoare you going to keep the discussion or should I start the bug meeting?15:03
enriquetasooh, i'll wait :)15:03
geguileoeharney: great15:03
geguileoenriquetaso: we just finished, sorry15:03
enriquetasodon't worry, it was a complex topic15:05
enriquetasoOK, i'll start:15:05
enriquetaso#startmeeting cinder_bs15:06
opendevmeetMeeting started Wed Jul  7 15:06:02 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is enriquetaso. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:06
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:06
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'cinder_bs'15:06
enriquetasohello!15:06
rosmaitao/15:06
enriquetasoHey Brian, we have 5 new bugs reported this week.15:06
enriquetaso#topic LVM calls - CI failure status15:06
enriquetasoAs Brian wrote early in the cinder meeting, Wallaby backport https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/798671 is waiting for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/798696/ to be merged. 15:06
enriquetasoPlease core reviews if you have some time please check those 2 ^15:06
enriquetaso:)15:06
enriquetaso#topic bug_1: Cinder matrix - clarification of snapshot attachment feature 15:07
enriquetaso#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/193416815:07
enriquetasoThanks hemna for reporting this. 15:07
enriquetasoThe question is if this should be pitched as an optimization rather than missing functionality in the driver and/or backend. 15:07
enriquetasoSummary: In most arrays, snapshots are not attachable entities. The default behavior is that a volume is created from the snapshot and that volume is then attached. 15:08
enriquetasoOption 1: remove this feature from the matrix.15:09
enriquetasoOption 2. Call out in 'Notes' that this is an optimization in backup support for drivers that can attach snapshots and is not a gap in functionality for those who don't.15:09
rosmaitai seem to remember discussing this -- was it at last week's meeting?15:09
rosmaitacinder meeting, not bug squad, i mean15:09
enriquetasooh, sorry about that15:09
walshh_Yes, I brought up it15:09
geguileoyes, I think we agreed on the note, right?15:10
enriquetasogreat, sorry! I'll update the launchpad but all this then15:10
walshh_I am happy to make that change if there are no objections.  Thank you15:10
enriquetaso:) cool15:11
rosmaitaeven better!15:11
geguileowalshh_: thanks!15:11
rosmaitayes, please put up a patch and we can discuss there15:11
walshh_will do15:11
enriquetasothanks!15:11
enriquetaso#topic bug_2:  Cinder can not use system scope due to endpoint15:11
enriquetaso#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/193448015:11
enriquetasoSummary: Cinder cannot use system scope since its endpoint has project_id and will get a empty url in catalog in system scope.15:12
enriquetasoI'm not completely sure if this is a feature or a bug.15:12
enriquetasoDoes cinder use the other scopes already (project-scope, domain-scope)?15:12
enriquetasoI've marked it as Medium importance but I should move it to the wishlist if it's a feature. 15:12
eharneyas written, this seems to be a bug about how keystone endpoints were deployed and not a cinder bug15:12
rosmaitai think also it is a duplicate15:12
geguileodidn't jokke report that one too?15:12
rosmaitapretty sure lbragstad filed a bug around this15:12
rosmaitai think jokke's was a bit different15:13
geguileoah, ok15:13
enriquetasoso, looks like a keystone bug then15:13
rosmaitawell, it's also a cinder problem15:14
eharneyno15:14
rosmaitaa system-scoped token is not related to any project15:14
enriquetasomake sense15:14
rosmaitabut we assume that every user , including an admin, is in a project15:14
rosmaitaand that project-id must be in the URL15:14
rosmaita(and we check somewhere that the URL project and token project match)15:15
eharneyso do we want this to be an RFE for "support system scope" in general?15:15
rosmaitasomething like that15:15
rosmaitathere's no good status in launchpad for that15:16
enriquetasobut, shouldn't mark it as duplicate of  lbragstad bug ? and continue the work on that one?15:16
rosmaitayes, if there is a bug15:16
rosmaitanot sure if there is though, i may be thinking of a patch15:16
rosmaitamaybe this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/192633615:17
opendevreviewjinyuanliu proposed openstack/cinder master: Clean up extra spaces  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/79984815:18
hemnarosmaita fwiw, I haven't had time to look at the ceph-iscsi CI job failures yet15:18
enriquetaso#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/192633615:18
enriquetasooh, well, then I can make 1934480 and RFE for "support system scope" as Eric mentioned?15:20
rosmaitahemna: that's ok, i did get the github mirroring working though15:21
hemnaok perfect thanks15:21
enriquetaso#action (enriquetaso):  make 1934480 RFE for "support system scope" :)15:23
enriquetasoOK, last one15:23
rosmaitaenriquetaso: sorry, i got pulled away for a minute15:23
enriquetasosure, don't worry, i think it was an obvious question doh :P15:23
enriquetaso#bug_3: Solidfire with OSprofiller and ElementOs15:24
enriquetasoThere are two bugs that sort of confused me. Maybe the reporter already discussed it in the cinder meeting and I forgot. :s15:24
enriquetasoOn the one hand, we have (1)https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1934459 "Enabling OSprofiler in a Openstack cluster with Element OS , runs into an infinite loop recursion".15:24
enriquetasoOn the other hand (2) https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1934435 I left a question asking if it's a feature or a bug report and asking for more info. 15:24
enriquetaso#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/193445915:24
enriquetaso#link https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1934435 15:24
enriquetasoThe first one looks like solidfire config isn't correct15:25
eharneybug 1934435 looks like the backend is throwing errors, someone from solidfire will need to look at that one15:25
eharneyfor 1934459, the solidfire driver should probably just stop overriding __getattr__, dunno why it does that 15:26
eharneyunsurprising that it causes weird issues15:26
enriquetasoeharney++15:28
enriquetasothanks Eric15:28
enriquetasoOK, that's all I have for today's meeting15:28
enriquetaso#topic open discussion 15:28
enriquetasodo we have any bug to discuss in this 2 min left15:29
enriquetasoOK! Thanks everyone!15:30
rosmaitathanks, sofia!15:30
enriquetasosorry for the misunderstanding in the first bugs 15:30
enriquetasomy head was a little clueless 15:30
enriquetaso#endmeeting15:30
opendevmeetMeeting ended Wed Jul  7 15:30:40 2021 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)15:30
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder_bs/2021/cinder_bs.2021-07-07-15.06.html15:30
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder_bs/2021/cinder_bs.2021-07-07-15.06.txt15:30
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cinder_bs/2021/cinder_bs.2021-07-07-15.06.log.html15:30
rosmaitaenriquetaso: not at all, anything involving multiple openstack projects is complicated15:31
enriquetaso:D15:32
jungleboyjrosmaita:  Did you seen diablo_rojo's mailing list item on Grace Hopper Open Source Days?15:55
rosmaitajungleboyj: no, looking now16:02
rosmaitacinder people: if anyone is interested in mentoring on July 15 for Grace Hopper Open Source Day, here is some info: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2021-July/023465.html16:09
jungleboyjrosmaita:  Right.  Wanted to make sure you had seen that.  Not sure if we have any work that is appropriate, but thought I would share.16:16
rosmaitaok, thanks16:17
jungleboyjNP.16:17
opendevreviewSimon Dodsley proposed openstack/cinder master: [WIP] Add Pure Storage NVMe-RoCE driver  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/79987117:00
opendevreviewSimon Dodsley proposed openstack/cinder master: [WIP] Add Pure Storage NVMe-RoCE driver  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/79987117:22
opendevreviewSimon Dodsley proposed openstack/cinder master: [WIP] Add Pure Storage NVMe-RoCE driver  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/79987117:47
opendevreviewDouglas Mendizábal proposed openstack/cinder master: WIP/DNM: Add fips check jobs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/79053520:05
opendevreviewBrian Rosmaita proposed openstack/cinder master: Drop lower-constraints jobs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/78907720:30
opendevreviewBrian Rosmaita proposed openstack/os-brick master: Drop lower-constraints jobs  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-brick/+/78907920:35
opendevreviewBrian Rosmaita proposed openstack/python-cinderclient master: Dropping lower constraints testing  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-cinderclient/+/78906520:41
opendevreviewBrian Rosmaita proposed openstack/cinderlib master: Drop lower-constraints file  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinderlib/+/79991320:50
opendevreviewBrian Rosmaita proposed openstack/rbd-iscsi-client master: Drop lower constraints testing  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/rbd-iscsi-client/+/79991420:57
opendevreviewBrian Rosmaita proposed openstack/python-cinderclient stable/wallaby: Remove skip_missing_interpreters  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-cinderclient/+/79988221:13
opendevreviewMerged openstack/cinder stable/wallaby: LVM: Use --readonly for lvdisplay in lv_has_snapshot  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cinder/+/79869622:42

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!