Wednesday, 2017-09-06

*** ddixit has quit IRC00:00
*** ddixit has joined #openstack-cinder00:00
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-cinder00:03
*** yangyapeng has quit IRC00:06
*** yangyapeng has joined #openstack-cinder00:07
*** harlowja has quit IRC00:09
*** yangyapeng has quit IRC00:11
*** s-shiono has joined #openstack-cinder00:12
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-cinder00:14
*** yangyapeng has joined #openstack-cinder00:18
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-cinder00:19
*** yangyapeng has quit IRC00:22
*** edmondsw has quit IRC00:24
*** wanghao has quit IRC00:27
*** wanghao has joined #openstack-cinder00:27
*** gouthamr has quit IRC00:45
openstackgerritSean McGinnis proposed openstack/cinder master: Remove API v1  https://review.openstack.org/49934200:46
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC00:49
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-cinder00:49
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-cinder00:53
*** mriedem has quit IRC00:55
openstackgerritTommyLike proposed openstack/cinder-specs master: Show resource's total count info in list APIs  https://review.openstack.org/50066500:55
*** harlowja has quit IRC00:57
openstackgerritYingzhe Zeng proposed openstack/cinder master: Fix an compatibility issue after Huawei driver upgrade  https://review.openstack.org/50074601:00
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-cinder01:01
*** ddixit has quit IRC01:03
*** ddixit has joined #openstack-cinder01:03
*** Apoorva_ has joined #openstack-cinder01:05
*** nicolasbock has quit IRC01:06
openstackgerritMerged openstack/cinder master: RBD: Fix stats reporting  https://review.openstack.org/48673401:09
*** Apoorva has quit IRC01:09
*** Apoorva_ has quit IRC01:10
*** yangyapeng has joined #openstack-cinder01:15
*** nicolasbock has joined #openstack-cinder01:21
*** scottda_ has quit IRC01:24
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-cinder01:43
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-cinder01:54
*** markstur has quit IRC01:57
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-cinder01:58
*** lhx__ has joined #openstack-cinder02:00
*** edmondsw has quit IRC02:02
*** winston-d has joined #openstack-cinder02:13
openstackgerritVipin Balachandran proposed openstack/cinder master: VMware: Use vSphere template as snapshot format  https://review.openstack.org/50107002:15
openstackgerritVipin Balachandran proposed openstack/cinder master: VMware: Use vSphere template as snapshot format  https://review.openstack.org/50107002:16
*** markvoelker has quit IRC02:18
*** lhx__ has quit IRC02:51
*** lhx__ has joined #openstack-cinder02:51
*** wanghao has quit IRC02:54
*** wanghao has joined #openstack-cinder02:55
*** markstur has joined #openstack-cinder02:56
*** zhurong has quit IRC02:58
*** yangyape_ has joined #openstack-cinder03:11
*** yangyap__ has joined #openstack-cinder03:14
*** yangyape_ has quit IRC03:14
*** yangyapeng has quit IRC03:14
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-cinder03:15
*** gkadam has joined #openstack-cinder03:16
*** yangyap__ has quit IRC03:19
*** yangyapeng has joined #openstack-cinder03:19
*** nicolasbock has quit IRC03:20
openstackgerritzhangbailin proposed openstack/cinder-specs master: Update url of the cinder-specs's document  https://review.openstack.org/50109803:23
*** links has joined #openstack-cinder03:28
*** yangyape_ has joined #openstack-cinder03:30
*** yangyapeng has quit IRC03:30
*** gouthamr has quit IRC03:46
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-cinder03:46
*** markvoelker has quit IRC03:48
*** edmondsw has quit IRC03:51
*** adisky__ has quit IRC03:55
*** zhurong has joined #openstack-cinder04:09
*** gcb has quit IRC04:19
openstackgerritlihaijing proposed openstack/cinder master: Api-ref: fix v2/v3 hosts extension api doc  https://review.openstack.org/47779804:20
*** gcb has joined #openstack-cinder04:21
*** psachin has joined #openstack-cinder04:31
*** armax has quit IRC04:44
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-cinder04:45
*** markstur_ has joined #openstack-cinder05:08
*** markstur has quit IRC05:08
*** markvoelker has quit IRC05:18
*** lhx__ has quit IRC05:20
*** lhx__ has joined #openstack-cinder05:20
*** pcaruana has joined #openstack-cinder05:27
*** markstur has joined #openstack-cinder05:30
*** lkuchlan_wfh has joined #openstack-cinder05:31
*** markstur_ has quit IRC05:33
*** lhx__ has quit IRC05:35
*** sticker has quit IRC05:37
*** liverpooler has joined #openstack-cinder05:46
*** yangyapeng has joined #openstack-cinder05:57
*** yangyape_ has quit IRC05:57
*** markstur has quit IRC06:00
*** zhaochao has quit IRC06:03
openstackgerritzhangbailin proposed openstack/python-cinderclient master: Update old url for cinderclient's document  https://review.openstack.org/50111306:06
*** zhaochao has joined #openstack-cinder06:08
*** markstur has joined #openstack-cinder06:21
*** markstur has quit IRC06:25
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-cinder06:28
*** links has quit IRC06:29
*** psachin has quit IRC06:29
*** lhx__ has joined #openstack-cinder06:30
*** yangyapeng has quit IRC06:35
*** yangyapeng has joined #openstack-cinder06:35
*** adisky__ has joined #openstack-cinder06:38
*** dulek has joined #openstack-cinder06:51
*** links has joined #openstack-cinder06:55
*** rcernin has joined #openstack-cinder06:57
*** e0ne has quit IRC06:57
*** abhi89 has joined #openstack-cinder06:57
*** psachin has joined #openstack-cinder06:59
*** pgadiya has joined #openstack-cinder07:12
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-cinder07:15
openstackgerrityixuan zhang proposed openstack/cinder master: Storwize: fix the wwpns error after NPIV enable.  https://review.openstack.org/50112807:16
openstackgerrityanghuichan proposed openstack/cinder master: Fix wrong links in Cinder  https://review.openstack.org/50112907:18
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-cinder07:22
*** edmondsw has quit IRC07:26
*** tesseract has joined #openstack-cinder07:30
*** lhx__ has quit IRC07:31
*** lhx__ has joined #openstack-cinder07:32
*** markvoelker has quit IRC07:49
*** hoonetorg has quit IRC07:58
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-cinder08:03
openstackgerritJesse Wu proposed openstack/cinder master: Synology: Driver unable to be initialized  https://review.openstack.org/47491708:10
*** lhx__ has quit IRC08:12
*** ociuhandu_ has quit IRC08:14
*** hoonetorg has joined #openstack-cinder08:15
*** yangyapeng has quit IRC08:19
*** yangyapeng has joined #openstack-cinder08:20
*** gcb has quit IRC08:23
*** liverpooler has quit IRC08:25
*** lhx__ has joined #openstack-cinder08:25
*** s-shiono has quit IRC08:34
openstackgerritArnon Yaari proposed openstack/cinder master: INFINIDAT: add support for overprovisioning  https://review.openstack.org/50078308:44
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-cinder08:46
*** alexchadin has joined #openstack-cinder08:47
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-cinder09:03
*** dalgaaf has quit IRC09:07
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-cinder09:08
*** dalgaaf has joined #openstack-cinder09:10
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-cinder09:13
*** yangyape_ has joined #openstack-cinder09:15
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC09:18
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC09:18
*** yangyapeng has quit IRC09:18
*** yangyape_ has quit IRC09:19
*** yangyapeng has joined #openstack-cinder09:19
*** markvoelker has quit IRC09:19
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-cinder09:20
*** zengyingzhe_ has joined #openstack-cinder09:23
*** zengyingzhe__ has quit IRC09:26
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-cinder09:29
openstackgerrityixuan zhang proposed openstack/cinder master: Storwize: add NPIV support  https://review.openstack.org/50112809:29
*** adisky__ has quit IRC09:32
*** stakeda has quit IRC09:35
*** HamdyK has joined #openstack-cinder09:37
*** alexchadin has quit IRC09:42
*** ociuhandu_ has joined #openstack-cinder09:52
*** sdague has joined #openstack-cinder09:53
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC09:54
*** yangyapeng has quit IRC09:56
*** yangyapeng has joined #openstack-cinder09:56
openstackgerritDai Dang Van proposed openstack/cinder master: Remove oslo.config from cinder-config-generator  https://review.openstack.org/48766309:59
*** nicolasbock has joined #openstack-cinder10:02
*** openstackgerrit has quit IRC10:03
*** nicolasbock has quit IRC10:07
*** abhi89 has quit IRC10:11
*** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-cinder10:12
openstackgerritAnton Arefiev proposed openstack/cinder master: RBD: get provisioned capacity using same connection  https://review.openstack.org/50004710:12
*** edmondsw has quit IRC10:13
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-cinder10:17
*** HamdyK has quit IRC10:17
*** ociuhandu_ has quit IRC10:18
*** yangyapeng has quit IRC10:25
*** yangyapeng has joined #openstack-cinder10:25
*** yangyapeng has quit IRC10:29
*** nicolasbock has joined #openstack-cinder10:36
openstackgerritIvan Kolodyazhny proposed openstack/cinder master: Deprecate service-to-driver mapping for backups  https://review.openstack.org/49681610:41
*** gaurangt has quit IRC10:48
*** markvoelker has quit IRC10:49
*** ganso has joined #openstack-cinder10:49
*** lhx_ has joined #openstack-cinder10:50
*** gaurangt has joined #openstack-cinder10:52
*** liverpooler has joined #openstack-cinder10:52
*** HamdyK has joined #openstack-cinder10:52
*** lhx__ has quit IRC10:53
*** zhurong has quit IRC10:54
*** alexchadin has joined #openstack-cinder10:58
*** alexchadin has joined #openstack-cinder10:58
*** nicolasbock has quit IRC11:07
*** nicolasbock has joined #openstack-cinder11:09
*** psachin has quit IRC11:19
*** pgadiya has quit IRC11:19
*** links has quit IRC11:20
openstackgerritArnon Yaari proposed openstack/cinder master: INFINIDAT: add support for overprovisioning  https://review.openstack.org/50078311:25
*** abhi89 has joined #openstack-cinder11:27
*** sumitshatwara has quit IRC11:28
*** yangyapeng has joined #openstack-cinder11:29
*** psachin has joined #openstack-cinder11:32
*** links has joined #openstack-cinder11:32
*** pgadiya has joined #openstack-cinder11:33
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-cinder11:39
*** nicolasbock has quit IRC11:40
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-cinder11:46
*** pgadiya has quit IRC11:48
*** lpetrut has quit IRC11:51
*** nicolasbock has joined #openstack-cinder11:52
*** alexchadin has quit IRC11:57
abhi89geguileo: hi.. reg https://review.openstack.org/#/c/500917/.. i had thought of covering TC for this change but couldn't find any UT related to that method.. It would be helpful if you can point me where/which TC i need to change for my changes..12:03
*** yangyapeng has quit IRC12:05
*** yangyapeng has joined #openstack-cinder12:05
*** gcb has joined #openstack-cinder12:05
geguileoabhi89: then you just need to add one12:06
geguileoabhi89: The code in there is probably covered by tests that are not following the correct unit tests procedures12:06
geguileoabhi89: and are indirectly testing it via the method that actually calls that one12:06
geguileoabhi89: check cinder/tests/unit/group/test_groups_api.py12:06
*** adrianofr has joined #openstack-cinder12:07
*** markstur has joined #openstack-cinder12:09
smcginnisgeguileo: Hey, if you have a moment, I'd apprecaite your eyes on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/500194/12:09
*** yangyapeng has quit IRC12:09
geguileosmcginnis: will do12:10
smcginnisgeguileo: Thanks12:10
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-cinder12:10
*** ociuhandu has joined #openstack-cinder12:10
*** edmondsw has quit IRC12:11
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-cinder12:11
*** markstur has quit IRC12:13
*** markvoelker has quit IRC12:20
abhi89geguileo: I had checked cinder/tests/unit/group/test_groups_api.py.. _validate_add_volumes() where I have my change is called by group update api call.. we have TC covered for update().. but nowhere have we referenced _validate_add_volumes() in that TC not have we written a separate TC for _validate_add_volumes..12:21
*** lhx_ has quit IRC12:21
geguileoabhi89: that's why I say that the code in there is probably covered by the test of the method that calls it12:21
*** lhx_ has joined #openstack-cinder12:21
geguileoeven though that goes agains the unit test way of doing things12:22
geguileoyou can just add a test that tests _validate_add_volumes and just covers the case you have added12:22
geguileoI'm OK with that, I won't require you to add all other tests12:22
geguileobut you should have a test for what you've fixed12:23
abhi89geguileo: sure.. i will add the TC for it..12:23
geguileoabhi89: thanks12:23
*** markvoelker has joined #openstack-cinder12:28
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-cinder12:28
*** evrardjp_ has quit IRC12:35
*** evrardjp has joined #openstack-cinder12:35
openstackgerritSean McGinnis proposed openstack/cinder master: Remove API v1  https://review.openstack.org/49934212:39
*** alexchadin has joined #openstack-cinder12:40
*** scottda_ has joined #openstack-cinder12:49
*** abishop has joined #openstack-cinder12:50
*** gkadam has quit IRC12:59
*** lhx_ has quit IRC13:02
*** mikal has quit IRC13:05
*** xyang1 has joined #openstack-cinder13:05
*** adisky__ has joined #openstack-cinder13:07
*** david-lyle has quit IRC13:09
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-cinder13:09
*** takedakn has joined #openstack-cinder13:10
*** lucasxu has joined #openstack-cinder13:10
*** mikal has joined #openstack-cinder13:12
*** dulek has quit IRC13:12
openstackgerritChhavi Agarwal proposed openstack/os-brick master: FC PPC64 device discovery issue  https://review.openstack.org/50125313:13
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-cinder13:13
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-cinder13:14
*** dulek has joined #openstack-cinder13:15
*** liverpooler has quit IRC13:16
openstackgerritSteve Noyes proposed openstack/cinder master: Fix attachments on volume show when volume is attaching  https://review.openstack.org/50010213:16
*** yangyapeng has joined #openstack-cinder13:16
*** liverpooler has joined #openstack-cinder13:16
*** zengyingzhe_ has quit IRC13:16
*** mchlumsky has joined #openstack-cinder13:17
*** zengyingzhe_ has joined #openstack-cinder13:17
*** yangyapeng has quit IRC13:20
openstackgerritChuck Fouts proposed openstack/cinder master: NetApp: Adds logging of ONTAP API version  https://review.openstack.org/50096513:28
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-cinder13:29
*** thegreenhundred has joined #openstack-cinder13:30
*** crose has joined #openstack-cinder13:32
*** alexchadin has quit IRC13:43
*** yangyapeng has joined #openstack-cinder13:43
kwathoreHi Team, Please review below link: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499970/13:45
smcginniskwathore: Done.13:45
*** alexchadin has joined #openstack-cinder13:45
kwathoreSean: Thanks13:47
*** yangyapeng has quit IRC13:48
*** crushil has quit IRC13:50
*** liverpooler has quit IRC13:50
*** Yogi1 has joined #openstack-cinder13:52
*** liverpooler has joined #openstack-cinder13:52
*** crushil has joined #openstack-cinder13:58
*** cknight has joined #openstack-cinder14:05
*** armax has joined #openstack-cinder14:10
*** takedakn has quit IRC14:17
*** ociuhandu has quit IRC14:17
*** yangyapeng has joined #openstack-cinder14:18
*** dustins has joined #openstack-cinder14:19
*** aspiers has quit IRC14:21
*** yangyapeng has quit IRC14:22
*** ntpttr_laptop has joined #openstack-cinder14:23
*** eharney has joined #openstack-cinder14:23
*** lkuchlan_wfh has quit IRC14:24
*** aspiers has joined #openstack-cinder14:27
*** links has quit IRC14:31
*** markstur has joined #openstack-cinder14:32
*** juzuluag_ has joined #openstack-cinder14:34
*** markstur has quit IRC14:37
openstackgerritEvgeny Antyshev proposed openstack/cinder master: vzstorage: return from _create_cloned_volume  https://review.openstack.org/49453914:37
*** lhx_ has joined #openstack-cinder14:43
*** wN has quit IRC14:47
HamdyKHi guys, Can you please review this commit https://review.openstack.org/#/c/482562/14:48
*** alexchadin has quit IRC14:51
*** markstur has joined #openstack-cinder14:52
*** wN has joined #openstack-cinder14:53
*** wN has quit IRC14:53
*** wN has joined #openstack-cinder14:53
openstackgerritEric Harney proposed openstack/cinder master: Enable hash randomization in unit tests  https://review.openstack.org/46563614:54
*** markstur_ has joined #openstack-cinder14:54
*** HamdyK has quit IRC14:55
*** esker has joined #openstack-cinder14:57
*** esker has quit IRC14:57
*** markstur has quit IRC14:58
*** esker has joined #openstack-cinder14:59
*** juzuluag_ has quit IRC15:01
openstackgerritEvgeny Antyshev proposed openstack/cinder master: vzstorage: return from _create_cloned_volume  https://review.openstack.org/49453915:02
*** felipemonteiro has joined #openstack-cinder15:03
*** felipemonteiro_ has joined #openstack-cinder15:05
*** adrianofr has quit IRC15:07
*** felipemonteiro has quit IRC15:08
*** david-lyle has quit IRC15:10
*** itlinux has quit IRC15:11
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-cinder15:15
openstackgerritEric Harney proposed openstack/cinder master: Tests: Don't write files to /tmp/nec/  https://review.openstack.org/50130915:17
*** adrianofr has joined #openstack-cinder15:35
*** felipemonteiro__ has joined #openstack-cinder15:38
*** lkuchlan_wfh has joined #openstack-cinder15:39
eharneyxyang1: have you seen this?  https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/171145515:41
openstackLaunchpad bug 1711455 in Cinder "GroupsTest.test_group_update failed with MismatchError: 2 != 1" [High,New]15:41
*** felipemonteiro_ has quit IRC15:41
xyang1eharney: not yet.  Will take a look15:41
eharneyxyang1: thanks15:42
*** felipemonteiro_ has joined #openstack-cinder15:43
hemnawait, 2 doesn't equal 1 ?15:45
*** felipemonteiro__ has quit IRC15:46
eharneyonly for very large values of 1 :)15:46
*** kaisers_ has joined #openstack-cinder15:47
e0ne:)15:47
*** ntpttr_laptop has quit IRC15:57
xyang1eharney: do you how to get cinder logs from this? I couldn't find it15:59
eharneyxyang1: they're up in the directory tree from console.html --   http://logs.openstack.org/53/494553/1/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-full-ubuntu-xenial/1793ab8/logs/16:00
xyang1eharney: thanks16:00
*** lucasxu has quit IRC16:00
*** lpetrut_ has joined #openstack-cinder16:00
*** lpetrut has quit IRC16:01
*** lpetrut__ has joined #openstack-cinder16:03
openstackgerritSean McGinnis proposed openstack/cinder master: Remove Coho volume driver  https://review.openstack.org/50132716:03
openstackgerritSean McGinnis proposed openstack/cinder master: Remove Blockbridge volume driver  https://review.openstack.org/50132816:03
openstackgerritSean McGinnis proposed openstack/cinder master: Remove FalconStor volume drivers  https://review.openstack.org/50132916:03
openstackgerritSean McGinnis proposed openstack/cinder master: Remove Infortrend drivers  https://review.openstack.org/50133016:03
openstackgerritSean McGinnis proposed openstack/cinder master: Remove QNAP volume driver  https://review.openstack.org/50133116:03
openstackgerritSean McGinnis proposed openstack/cinder master: Remove Reduxio volume driver  https://review.openstack.org/50133216:03
openstackgerritSean McGinnis proposed openstack/cinder master: Remove Tegile volume driver  https://review.openstack.org/50133316:03
openstackgerritSean McGinnis proposed openstack/cinder master: Remove Violin volume drivers  https://review.openstack.org/50133416:03
openstackgerritSean McGinnis proposed openstack/cinder master: Remove X-IO volume driver  https://review.openstack.org/50133516:03
openstackgerritSean McGinnis proposed openstack/cinder master: Remove ZTE volume driver  https://review.openstack.org/50133616:03
*** david-lyle has quit IRC16:04
*** dklyle has joined #openstack-cinder16:04
*** ntpttr_laptop has joined #openstack-cinder16:04
*** lpetrut_ has quit IRC16:05
e0nesmcginnis: good clean up!16:09
smcginnise0ne: Going for the most lines of code removed for Queens. ;)16:13
e0nesmcginnis: chellange accepted!16:13
smcginnisHehe16:13
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-cinder16:14
*** dklyle has quit IRC16:15
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC16:17
*** david-lyle has joined #openstack-cinder16:18
*** lkuchlan_wfh has quit IRC16:23
*** Apoorva has joined #openstack-cinder16:29
*** felipemonteiro__ has joined #openstack-cinder16:30
*** itlinux_ has joined #openstack-cinder16:31
*** itlinux has quit IRC16:32
*** felipemonteiro__ has quit IRC16:33
*** felipemonteiro__ has joined #openstack-cinder16:33
*** felipemonteiro_ has quit IRC16:34
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-cinder16:38
*** lucasxu has joined #openstack-cinder16:47
geguileotommylikehu: in my defense according to our docs we should have the microversion, that's why I said yes   ;-)16:47
openstackgerritMerged openstack/cinder master: Fix an compatibility issue after Huawei driver upgrade  https://review.openstack.org/50074616:48
tommylikehugeguileo:  ok..16:48
geguileobecause if I'm not mistaken this changes the query parameter values of a non free form field16:48
geguileobut I agree that it's crazy to bump a microversion for these kind of things if there's a discovery mechanism for possible values16:48
jgriffithsmcginnis tommylikehu sorry... was tied up;  So my proposal was to provide an api call that:16:48
jgriffitha.  Lists available/valid filters16:49
jgriffithb. Lists configured filters16:49
jgriffithI guess that's 2 api calls :)16:49
smcginnisHah16:49
tommylikehujgriffith:  come on man16:49
smcginnisThere wasn't actually a comment earlier about 1 != 216:49
jgriffithsue me :)16:50
smcginnis:)16:50
*** felipemonteiro_ has joined #openstack-cinder16:50
*** felipemonteiro__ has quit IRC16:54
tommylikehujgriffith, smcginnis:  if most of our users use the release version, then the doc which describes  the valid filters for this release is good enough I guess.16:54
*** psachin has quit IRC16:55
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC16:56
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-cinder16:56
smcginnistommylikehu: We should see if there is somewhere in the configuration reference that we can note this.16:57
smcginnisThen if they use the config reference for whichever release they are using, they will have accurate information.16:57
tommylikehusmcginnis:  yes, and I already added one: https://github.com/openstack/cinder/blob/master/doc/source/man/generalized_filters.rst16:59
*** lpetrut_ has joined #openstack-cinder16:59
bswartzgeguileo: did you want to talk here?17:00
geguileobswartz: hi17:00
bswartzgouthamr: ^17:00
gouthamrpong17:00
geguileobswartz: any idea when over provisioning will be fixed?17:00
*** e0ne has quit IRC17:01
*** lpetrut__ has quit IRC17:01
bswartzlet me find out who is working on that specific bug -- we definitely know about it17:01
geguileobswartz: yeah, sorry about it reaching you by 2 different ways...17:02
*** rcernin has quit IRC17:02
*** yangyapeng has joined #openstack-cinder17:06
*** harlowja has quit IRC17:07
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-cinder17:07
*** felipemonteiro_ has quit IRC17:08
*** lpetrut_ has quit IRC17:09
*** felipemonteiro_ has joined #openstack-cinder17:09
*** yangyapeng has quit IRC17:10
*** felipemonteiro__ has joined #openstack-cinder17:11
* gouthamr #end hallway conversation 17:12
bswartzgeguileo: okay it appears that bug is on the backlog but not being actively worked on17:12
geguileo:'-(17:12
bswartzthe fix is expected to be quite simple but testing it will require some effort17:12
*** Aditya has joined #openstack-cinder17:13
bswartzI think the bug stems from a misunderstanding about the thin provisioning design going all the way back to paris17:13
geguileoyeah, that's why I started working on the stats spec17:13
geguileobecause we are all understanding different things regarding what the terms mean17:13
*** Aditya has quit IRC17:13
bswartzWe believe that we simply shouldn't be reporting a value for provisioned capacity, because the value we're computing has nothing to do with what the scheduler expects17:13
geguileoso drivers reports something that later on doesn't match with how cinder core code does the calculations17:13
*** Aditya has joined #openstack-cinder17:14
*** felipemonteiro_ has quit IRC17:14
geguileobswartz: my initial idea was to do that, just remove it17:14
bswartzand the scheduler is able to compute its own value which will be correct17:14
bswartzso what needs to happens is that we need to remove the calculation and then try it out in some real world scenarios17:15
geguileobswartz: but it will only be correct if sum(pool_volumes.sizes) = sum(backend_volumes.sizes)17:15
bswartzit's unfortunate that automated test coverage doesn't exist in this area17:15
bswartzso the testing will be manual17:15
geguileobswartz: does the netapp driver support multiple pools on each backend?17:15
bswartzif we had automated test coverage it would probably have been fixed and tested already17:15
bswartzgeguileo: yes17:16
bswartzbut cinder knows which volumes are in which pools, so it's able to compute a per-pool sum if it wishes17:16
geguileobswartz: then I believe you cannot just remove the field17:16
*** JoseMello has joined #openstack-cinder17:16
geguileobswartz: It doesn't work like that right now17:16
geguileoafaik17:16
bswartzI see17:17
bswartzwell the information the cinder scheduler wants seems to exist in the database and not in the storage controller17:17
bswartzso it would be weird to put a fix in the driver17:17
bswartzwe can stop reporting the incorrect value, but the calculation of the correct value probably needs to come from the manager or the scheduler itself17:18
bswartzwe can help write that code if needed17:18
*** ntpttr_laptop has quit IRC17:18
geguileobswartz: here you can see what happens when you don't repport it https://github.com/openstack/cinder/blob/master/cinder/scheduler/host_manager.py#L34517:18
bswartzbut that's more effort than just removing some bad code and testing the change17:19
geguileobswartz: the thing is that you could have other pools and volumes not used by cinder, so Cinder wouldn't be able to calculate the actual provisioned capacity17:19
bswartzokay the comments don't clear anything up17:20
jgriffithsmcginnis tommylikehu just keep in mind you need a way for automation (ie Ansible) to query things like this17:20
bswartzI'm as confused today as I was in Paris17:20
geguileobswartz: lol17:20
geguileobswartz: I tried to improve it a little bit: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/490116/2/specs/queens/provisioning-improvements.rst17:21
bswartzgeguileo: perhaps you could explain in your own words what provisioned_capacity_gb and allocated_capacity_gb should be17:21
geguileobswartz: I explained it in that doc, but basically17:21
bswartzoh good17:21
geguileoallocated = volumes cinder know about, should not be reported by the driver17:21
bswartzI'm reading it now17:22
geguileoprovisioned = every volume in the backend17:22
geguileoand both are "virtual sizes" not real disk usage17:22
geguileoif the spec is not clear please add a comment, as I'd like to ensure that there are no more confussion17:22
bswartzokay how is provisioned different from total space (minus) free space?17:22
geguileo2 lines above is the answer17:23
geguileothey are "virtual sizes", which means the maximum size the volume can be17:23
geguileoif it's full17:23
bswartzokay what about stuff other than volumes that consumes space out of the pool?17:24
geguileoprovisioned is not regarding the pool is in the backend17:24
geguileothe whole backend17:24
geguileoand it's not about physical usage17:24
geguileoso if snapshots take up space, it doesn't matter17:25
geguileothey are not reported there17:25
*** lpetrut has joined #openstack-cinder17:25
geguileoat least that's what I understand after reading the various specs, reading the code, etc.17:25
bswartzhas xyang1 reviewed your spec yet? does she agree with your definitions?17:26
geguileobswartz: she has taken a look, on the first patch she pointed out a mistake17:26
geguileobut I'm not sure if she has given it a real good look or just a quick one17:27
xyang1bswartz: I did a quick look of the first patch set.  Will take a closer look later17:27
bswartzokay give me a few moments to absorb this whole document17:27
geguileobswartz: and please, please, point out everything that is too convoluted, or just not clear17:27
xyang1bswartz: geguileo I'll try to get to it this week17:27
geguileoxyang1: thanks!!17:28
xyang1geguileo: np17:28
bswartzso my problem is that concepts around thin provisioning and space accounting are inherently complex and hard to understand -- you're forced to make some simplifying assumptions if you want to maintain sanity17:28
*** ntpttr_laptop has joined #openstack-cinder17:29
*** diablo_rojo has quit IRC17:29
geguileoand you don't think Cinder's approach is right?17:31
geguileoor what's the problem you se/17:31
geguileosee?17:31
bswartzcinder makes one set of simplifying assumptions -- which is a good thing -- as long as we agree on them and understand them17:32
mriedemdid something change recently in cinder/castellan related to the key manager and how it's instantiated? http://logs.openstack.org/70/500770/7/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-full-ubuntu-xenial/b813494/logs/screen-c-api.txt.gz?level=TRACE#_Sep_06_17_25_08_18225517:32
geguileobswartz: I completely agree!!!17:32
*** adisky__ has quit IRC17:32
geguileothat's why I'm making the effort on this area17:32
geguileobecause I think everyone understand something different17:33
geguileoand currect docs don't help17:33
bswartzthe key is to make sure that we're on the same page about which complexity we're ignoring -- the complexity won't go away, but can pretend it's not there to make the problem tractable17:33
bswartzin the case of your document it appears we're chosing to ignore phantom space effects like free space created by the magic of deduplication17:34
geguileocorrect, that's how Cinder is working17:35
geguileobecause if you have deduplication you know you can set a higher over provisioning ratio17:35
bswartzso given the choice between 2 backends, each with the same amount of volumes and total size, cinder won't prefer the one that has better deduplication17:36
bswartzdeduplication is an unpredictable phenomenon -- it's hard to know how it will perform without trying it, and its performance can change over time -- simply writing to an existing full volume can cause your free space to go down without warning17:38
jgriffithoh lord, this whole thing again :(17:39
geguileobswartz: that should be decided on the weighing17:39
bswartzand in the worst case you can hit the dreaded ENOSPC  while deleting a file17:39
jgriffithbswartz yes, it's somewhat unpredictable; however as the driver continuously updates it's effeciency calculations it's fairly stable17:40
jgriffithif you have 1K volumes deployed in your cloud and a TB of data written and you're getting 4x it's safe to say that adding another volume isn't going to alter that ratio significantly17:40
mriedemthis breaks cinder with castellan 0.13.0 https://github.com/openstack/castellan/commit/1a13c2b2030390e3c0a5d498da486d92ddd1152c#diff-db470a49644fe6fb19e2a281019745c817:40
mriedemfyi17:40
mriedemmissing ABC method17:41
jgriffithbswartz and you won't hit ENOSPC when the driver has enough sense to stop provisioning after a safe threshold is reached17:41
bswartzjgriffith: but according to geguileo cinder doesn't pay attention to anything other than total space, free space, allocated space, and privisioned space, and the only one of those that reflects the effects of deduplication is free space17:42
jgriffithbswartz and it shouldn't17:42
hemnaoverprovisioning ratio as well17:42
jgriffithbut drivers can and should be smart enough in what they report back17:42
hemnajgriffith, +117:43
jgriffithanyway17:43
jgriffithNothings perfect17:43
bswartzjgriffith: when I say worst case I mean gremlins writing data to all of your volumes after you've overprovisioned17:43
jgriffithbut shooting holes in every solution that's been proposed for the last 5 years isn't helping either :)17:43
jgriffithbswartz sure17:43
jgriffithbswartz there's certainly risky things like that17:43
jgriffithbut that's sort of life with modern day storage IMO17:44
jgriffithfor those that don't like that, we offer things like excluding efficiency calculations in reporting17:44
jgriffithI actually have customers that do exactly that17:44
jgriffithfine by me... they keep buying more nodes even though they're not using 1/2 of the ones they have :)17:44
jgriffithbswartz so if you want 1:1 then do 1:117:45
jgriffithproblem solved17:45
bswartzyeah thick provisioning exists for a reason17:45
stvnoyeshi jgriffith, would you take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/500102/ when you get a chance? Thanks.17:46
bswartzanyways I'm not trying to shoot holes the current solution I'm trying to make sure I understand which details the current solution ignores so we can provide the correct numbers17:46
jgriffithstvnoyes sure, I'll take a look right now17:46
jgriffithbswartz yeah... sorry; didn't mean it that way17:46
jgriffithbswartz I gave up on fully understanding these things a long time ago :)17:47
jgriffithstvnoyes oh cool!17:48
jgriffithstvnoyes so believe it or not that weirdness I had on L#120 was there for a reason17:49
jgriffithstvnoyes there was something missing in the object and I was far too lazy to figure it out or fix it so I hacked around it by sucking the data out of the volume17:49
jgriffithstvnoyes which then resulted in the bug you logged here17:49
jgriffithbecause the volume isn't updated yet17:50
bswartzgeguileo: based on my understanding of your document, on NetApp pools provisioned capacity will always equal allocated capacity, because there is never a case when we attempt to share underlying storage devices across pools or backends17:51
geguileobswartz: it does sound like in your case you can just remove the key from the stats then17:53
bswartzand when you do something like unmanage a volume the resulting thing becomes indistinguishable from all the other stuff lying around which we're explicitly not counting under either allocated or provisioned capacity17:53
ildikovsmcginnis: hi17:53
*** nicolasbock has quit IRC17:53
ildikovsmcginnis: quick question, what's the story with this patch now: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/489715/ ?17:54
*** ddixit has joined #openstack-cinder17:55
ddixitTintri-CI has been failing to build devstack since this update: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/499984/3 was merged. Here are the logs for the failure: http://openstack-ci.tintri.com/tintri/refs-changes-84-499984-3/stack.sh.log.out.17:55
ddixitWe tried upgrading/reinstalling pyasn1 and pyasn-modules. It still fails with ContextualVersionConflict: (pyasn1 0.3.3 (/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages), Requirement.parse(‘pyasn1==0.3.2’), set([‘pyasn1-modules’])). Can someone have a look and suggest ways to resolve this? Thanks!17:55
geguileobswartz: yeah, we can consider those as corner cases17:55
smcginnisddixit: Wrong channel?17:55
smcginnisildikov: Not sure now. I think Jens was working on a better overall fix that would get rid of public_endpoint.17:56
ildikovsmcginnis: hmm, ok17:56
*** wanghao_ has joined #openstack-cinder17:57
geguileobswartz: and you can always have a not that says that if they use the pool for something other than cinder then the provisioning will not be as accurate17:57
ildikovsmcginnis: I haven't checked, but I think we will still need a fix in Devstack to have the microversion detection working correctly with the client17:57
ildikovsmcginnis: so I guess I'll need to ping Jens then to figure this out17:57
*** lhx_ has quit IRC17:57
ddixitsmcginnis this is about Tintri Cinder CI failure17:58
smcginnisildikov: That might be best.17:59
*** wanghao has quit IRC17:59
bswartzgeguileo: it's unclear why the "provisioned capacity" number of useful to cinder if it doesn't account for miscellaneous space consumers and only tries to account for non-cinder-owned "volumes" on the pool in question17:59
geguileobswartz: because that's how over provisioning was designed17:59
ildikovsmcginnis: ok, will do, thanks18:00
geguileoor you could say that's the simplification Cinder went with18:00
geguileoyou define max over provisioning ratio18:00
geguileoand the backends report the current provisioning value18:00
bswartzI think the key here is the calculations section that explains what cinder will actually do with these values18:00
smcginnisildikov: Might be interesting to change your Depends-on to point to that other patch and see if it makes a difference.18:01
bswartzso that driver authors can understand whether it makes sense to report other "stuff" or not in the number based on how cinder will behave if they do or don't18:01
geguileoand then you use the max ratio multiplied by the current reported value to know if the backend is elligible18:01
openstackgerritMerged openstack/cinder master: HPE Lefthand: fix volume manage operation  https://review.openstack.org/49997018:01
ildikovsmcginnis: that's not a bad idea, I'll do that18:01
*** itlinux_ has quit IRC18:01
geguileobswartz: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/490116/2/specs/queens/provisioning-improvements.rst@25218:02
*** harlowja has quit IRC18:02
bswartzbasically we're trying to represent a risk factor here by telling cinder how much unwritten data could get written in the future, but the actual knob we give to administrator is an overprovisioning ratio, which is a really clumsy tool to manage space with18:03
openstackgerritMerged openstack/cinder master: Remove unsupported BlockDeviceDriver  https://review.openstack.org/50083118:03
bswartzmanaging space with an overprovisioning ratio is only possible with the benefit of historical data to make you feel safe about any given value18:04
geguileobswartz: the only "tool" you have right now to do so is free space18:04
geguileobswartz: if you want to report the real physical usage: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/490116/2/specs/queens/provisioning-improvements.rst@29718:05
openstackgerritMerged openstack/cinder master: VMware: Remove unused variables  https://review.openstack.org/48408518:05
bswartzgeguileo: how is "total used" different from "total capacity" (minus) "free capacity"18:06
geguileobswartz: lol, it's not (I really need to sleep more)18:07
geguileobswartz: is there anything you think should be reported that would help admins?18:08
*** Aditya has quit IRC18:08
bswartzgeguileo: if there was a way to predict the future, that would be helpful18:12
geguileorofl18:13
*** xyang has joined #openstack-cinder18:13
bswartzfor example, if we know that, on average, each volume will get filled up 25% (based on observations about the past) then it would be reasonable to assume that newly created volumes will probably also used up 25% of their apparent size18:13
bswartzunfortunately we can only guess about such things18:14
geguileowe could implement some kind of automatic over provisioning ration18:15
geguileos/ration/ratio18:15
geguileoso max over provisioning ratio is set to "auto"18:15
bswartzthe biggest problem I see with scheduling is how we handle large bursts of provisioning followed by large bursts of writing, rather than a simpler, provision/write/provision/write cycle18:15
bswartzwhen you create a volume (not from an image or snapshot) it initially consumes zero bytes if its thin provisioned18:16
geguileoI think I know what you mean...18:16
bswartzand oversubscription is insane unless you have good reason to believe the request won't actually use the whole thing18:17
bswartzso if you can only come up with a good guess about the future usage of that volume, then you can make a better decision about where to put it18:17
bswartzs/request/requester/18:17
geguileoI see, that's something different from automatic over provisioning ratio18:18
geguileoor it could be that, but at the scheduler level18:18
bswartzperhaps18:18
geguileoI'll give it a thought and see if I can come up with something that helps18:18
bswartzif I was a storage admin, the only thing that could help me sleep at night would be the ability to automatically migrate volumes to deal with low-space conditions18:19
xyangeharney: I updated the bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/171145518:20
openstackLaunchpad bug 1711455 in Cinder "GroupsTest.test_group_update failed with MismatchError: 2 != 1" [High,New]18:20
bswartzand if I had that, then I could set my overprovisioning ratios to infinity and not worry about it18:20
xyangeharney: we need to backport https://review.openstack.org/#/c/484246/ to stable/ocata and stable/newton18:20
xyangeharney: but they are now closed18:20
eharneyxyang: great, thanks for analyzing that18:20
xyangeharney: alternatively I could modify the tempest test to accommodate this problem18:21
geguileobswartz: that's an interesting idea indeed...18:21
eharneyxyang: landing that fix in stable/ocata seems doable?18:22
openstackgerritChhavi Agarwal proposed openstack/os-brick master: FC PPC64 device discovery issue  https://review.openstack.org/50125318:22
geguileobswartz: migrating volumes effectively would be tricky if you have deduplication, as you could be moving volumes with barely any gain...18:24
xyangeharney: it's doable.  I thought it's closed?18:24
xyangeharney: but this is a critical issue so we can still backport?18:24
geguileobswartz: do your backends have a way of knowing how much data will be freed if a volume is removed?18:25
bswartzgeguileo: yeah the hardest problem I've ever encountered in storage is this question: If I delete this thing, how much space will I get back?18:25
geguileobswartz: I know how to get that info on the RBD backend, that's why I was asking if it was possible in yours18:26
bswartzgeguileo: yes it's possible to do, but it requires time+cpu linear to the volume size18:26
eharneyxyang: stable/ocata should be in "critical bugfixes" mode now -- this seems like it would still qualify since it's a gate-failure18:26
geguileobswartz: an example of size & time?18:26
bswartzgeguileo: I just mean it's not a constant time operation18:27
xyangeharney: alright.  I'll submit a backport then18:27
xyangeharney: what about newton?  they say it failed in newton as well18:27
bswartzyou can to scan the block tree for all the blocks that would be freed by deletion of the object, which takes time proportional to the object18:27
geguileobswartz: yeah, I understood, but even if it's linear if we are talking 10ms for 1GB it may not a problem, that's why I was asking about an example  ;-)18:28
bswartzproportional to the size of  the object18:28
bswartzoh, I'm not sure but I think it's worse than that18:28
eharneyxyang: https://releases.openstack.org/ says EOL in October, not sure what the best plan is there18:28
bswartzmore importantly, other I/O would be impacted by such queries so it would be unwise to his the controller with those kinds of queries all the time18:29
bswartzs/his/hit/18:29
geguileobswartz: I think automatic over provisioning would help alleviate that problem, but I'll try to give that idea some thought as well...18:29
xyangeharney: ok, I'll backport to stable/ocata first.  maybe we'll have to skip the test in stable/newton if we can't backport to there18:30
*** tesseract has quit IRC18:31
*** xyang has quit IRC18:32
openstackgerritChhavi Agarwal proposed openstack/os-brick master: FC PPC64 device discovery issue  https://review.openstack.org/50125318:42
*** chhavi has joined #openstack-cinder18:43
chhavijungleboyj, eharney: review request https://review.openstack.org/#/c/501253/18:44
*** adrianofr has quit IRC18:50
*** crose has quit IRC18:53
*** adrianofr has joined #openstack-cinder18:54
xyang1eharney: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/501377/18:55
*** xyang has joined #openstack-cinder18:57
*** catinthe_ has joined #openstack-cinder19:04
*** catintheroof has quit IRC19:06
*** catintheroof has joined #openstack-cinder19:06
*** e0ne has joined #openstack-cinder19:08
*** catinthe_ has quit IRC19:10
openstackgerritMatt Riedemann proposed openstack/cinder master: Fix test_rpc_consumer_isolation for oslo.messaging 5.31.0  https://review.openstack.org/50138519:14
mriedemsmcginnis: ^ fixes that one test19:18
smcginnismriedem: Thanks19:19
*** chhavi has quit IRC19:20
mriedemnova has the same test :)19:20
mriedemsurprise surprise19:20
smcginnisGee, how'd that happen.19:20
*** ddixit has quit IRC19:22
*** abhi89 has quit IRC19:23
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-cinder19:29
*** crushil has quit IRC19:31
*** itlinux has quit IRC19:33
*** pcaruana has quit IRC19:34
*** ntpttr_laptop has quit IRC19:41
*** lbragstad has quit IRC19:43
*** lbragstad has joined #openstack-cinder19:45
*** ddixit has joined #openstack-cinder19:45
*** xyang has quit IRC19:47
openstackgerritSean McGinnis proposed openstack/cinder master: Implement keymgr list() method  https://review.openstack.org/50139819:47
*** ddixit has quit IRC19:50
*** xyang has joined #openstack-cinder19:50
*** ntpttr_laptop has joined #openstack-cinder19:53
*** Apoorva has quit IRC20:00
*** eharney has quit IRC20:04
*** felipemonteiro_ has joined #openstack-cinder20:09
*** crushil has joined #openstack-cinder20:09
*** kaisers_ has quit IRC20:09
*** prometheanfire has joined #openstack-cinder20:11
prometheanfirelooks like the new oslo-messaging may break cinder http://logs.openstack.org/57/501157/1/check/gate-cross-cinder-python27-ubuntu-xenial/cb5afa5/20:11
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC20:11
*** liverpooler has quit IRC20:11
smcginnisprometheanfire: I think mriedem just pushed up a patch to fix that.20:11
prometheanfireah, cool beans20:12
smcginnisBut like it says, that should never get called. :D20:12
prometheanfire:D20:12
*** felipemonteiro__ has quit IRC20:12
smcginnisprometheanfire: If you're interested: https://review.openstack.org/50138520:13
smcginnisjungleboyj, xyang1, e0ne, geguileo: Might be good to get that through. ^^20:13
*** Apoorva has joined #openstack-cinder20:13
smcginnisI think that and https://review.openstack.org/501398 are holding up a requirements update.20:14
smcginnisprometheanfire: Think it's worth the time to put Depends-on tags on the u-c patch?20:14
prometheanfireyou know where the review for https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-requirements/+bug/1715451 is (if it's in progress)?20:15
openstackLaunchpad bug 1715451 in Cinder "Castellan 0.13.0 doesn't work with ConfKeyManager due to missing list() abstract method" [Low,In progress] - Assigned to Sean McGinnis (sean-mcginnis)20:15
prometheanfireya, probably20:15
smcginnisprometheanfire: Yep, that's https://review.openstack.org/50139820:16
prometheanfireadded deps-on to the oslo-messaging update20:17
prometheanfirethat fixes castellan as well?20:17
prometheanfireoh, wrong tab20:17
smcginnisCastellan: https://review.openstack.org/501398, oslo-messaging: https://review.openstack.org/50138520:18
prometheanfireyep20:18
*** ddixit has joined #openstack-cinder20:20
*** ddixit has quit IRC20:21
prometheanfireok, deps on for ALLTHETHINGS20:21
*** jmlowe_ has quit IRC20:33
*** jmlowe has joined #openstack-cinder20:34
*** Apoorva_ has joined #openstack-cinder20:36
*** e0ne has quit IRC20:38
*** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-cinder20:40
*** Apoorva has quit IRC20:40
*** ddixit has joined #openstack-cinder20:41
*** lucasxu has quit IRC20:42
*** ddixit has quit IRC20:43
*** ddixit has joined #openstack-cinder20:44
*** cknight has quit IRC20:51
*** lpetrut has quit IRC20:52
*** eharney has joined #openstack-cinder21:02
*** mriedem has quit IRC21:02
*** dave-mcc_ has joined #openstack-cinder21:02
*** mriedem has joined #openstack-cinder21:03
*** dave-mccowan has quit IRC21:05
*** adrianofr has quit IRC21:10
*** itlinux has joined #openstack-cinder21:12
*** Apoorva_ has quit IRC21:14
*** Yogi1 has quit IRC21:14
*** Apoorva has joined #openstack-cinder21:14
*** gouthamr has quit IRC21:15
ildikovsmcginnis: FYI, the Nova change works well with Jens's patch21:19
smcginnisildikov: Excellent!21:19
mriedemsmcginnis: i think i know about the iso8601 thing21:21
mriedemwith 0.1.1221:21
mriedemsomeone recently fixed a problem with that in nova21:21
smcginnismriedem: Just got confused by that.21:21
mriedemhttps://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/3d86ae664a784e3f261943bd014dc88c82ea8b5d21:22
smcginnismriedem: Tested in one venv and I see the new behavior. Ran tests on my change and it failed.21:22
mriedemcopy ^21:22
*** yangyapeng has joined #openstack-cinder21:22
smcginnismriedem: What's the trick? http://paste.openstack.org/show/620564/21:23
mriedemhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/498287/21:23
smcginnisOooh! Utc>UTC21:24
mriedemsmcginnis: it's different on py321:24
smcginnisSome library maintainer needs a swift kick to somewhere soft.21:24
smcginnisOK, that difference works on all my venvs.21:25
*** yangyapeng has quit IRC21:27
*** crushil has quit IRC21:29
*** crushil has joined #openstack-cinder21:30
*** Apoorva_ has joined #openstack-cinder21:33
*** Apoorva has quit IRC21:37
*** ddixit has quit IRC21:41
*** ddixit has joined #openstack-cinder21:42
openstackgerritSean McGinnis proposed openstack/cinder master: Implement keymgr list() method  https://review.openstack.org/50139821:45
*** harlowja has joined #openstack-cinder21:45
*** xyang has quit IRC21:49
openstackgerritSean McGinnis proposed openstack/cinder master: Use newer location for iso8601 UTC  https://review.openstack.org/50147221:49
*** xyang has joined #openstack-cinder21:50
*** xyang has quit IRC21:51
*** edmondsw has quit IRC21:52
openstackgerritChuck Fouts proposed openstack/cinder master: NetApp: Remove redundant QoS cleanup task  https://review.openstack.org/50147821:56
*** catintheroof has quit IRC21:56
*** dave-mcc_ has quit IRC21:57
*** ddixit has quit IRC21:59
openstackgerritSean McGinnis proposed openstack/cinder master: Remove Blockbridge volume driver  https://review.openstack.org/50132822:07
openstackgerritSean McGinnis proposed openstack/cinder master: Remove FalconStor volume drivers  https://review.openstack.org/50132922:07
openstackgerritSean McGinnis proposed openstack/cinder master: Remove Coho volume driver  https://review.openstack.org/50132722:07
*** xyang1 has quit IRC22:09
openstackgerritMerged openstack/cinder master: Fix test_rpc_consumer_isolation for oslo.messaging 5.31.0  https://review.openstack.org/50138522:10
*** erlon has quit IRC22:11
*** mchlumsky has quit IRC22:15
*** ddixit has joined #openstack-cinder22:19
*** edmondsw has joined #openstack-cinder22:23
*** ddixit has quit IRC22:24
*** edmondsw has quit IRC22:28
*** JoseMello has quit IRC22:35
*** dustins has quit IRC22:39
*** Apoorva_ has quit IRC22:40
*** Apoorva has joined #openstack-cinder22:41
*** gouthamr has joined #openstack-cinder22:53
*** thegreenhundred has quit IRC22:55
*** scottda_ has quit IRC23:00
*** felipemonteiro_ has quit IRC23:01
*** Apoorva_ has joined #openstack-cinder23:01
*** Apoorva has quit IRC23:05
*** felipemonteiro has joined #openstack-cinder23:09
*** itlinux has quit IRC23:16
*** ddixit has joined #openstack-cinder23:22
*** ddixit has quit IRC23:24
*** alkhodos has quit IRC23:35
*** ntpttr_laptop has quit IRC23:36
*** yangyapeng has joined #openstack-cinder23:38
*** yangyapeng has quit IRC23:43

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!