| *** jmlowe has quit IRC | 03:00 | |
| *** jmlowe has joined #openstack-barbican | 03:11 | |
| *** tonyb has quit IRC | 04:10 | |
| *** tkajinam has quit IRC | 05:21 | |
| *** tkajinam has joined #openstack-barbican | 05:22 | |
| *** tosky has joined #openstack-barbican | 07:26 | |
| icey | hey - I'm still hoping to hear back regarding the recent mysql8 fix that was landed for Victoria, and if there are plans to backport anything to get Ussuri working with mysql8 | 07:51 |
|---|---|---|
| tosky | you can ask later during the weekly barbican meeting: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Barbican_Meeting | 08:04 |
| tosky | or you can propose a backport and wait for +2 or -2 | 08:05 |
| tosky | (which fix, by the way?) | 08:05 |
| icey | tosky: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/753699/ - I honestly don't think it's appropriate for a backfix, which makes me sad as it seems like a more restricted fix would have been nicer | 08:34 |
| tosky | erm, probably not | 08:35 |
| icey | tosky: hence the question: will ussuri support mysql8? because if it doesn't, it's likely to have some issues with functional validation for backports as testing just moved to Ubuntu Focal (comes with mysql8) | 08:37 |
| icey | (also, harder to support on Ubuntu Focal in general) | 08:38 |
| tosky | well, I don't see a problem if a victoria testing moved to Focal | 08:43 |
| tosky | it's not the first time a breaking change happens | 08:43 |
| tosky | ussuri only supports py3, victoria adds py38, but train is still py2 + py3 | 08:43 |
| tosky | and backports happen | 08:43 |
| tosky | Ussuri is not officially tested on Focal (because https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/runtimes/ussuri.html ) | 08:43 |
| icey | Ubuntu Focal ships with OpenStack Ussuri so, right now, Barbican doesn't work on Ubuntu Focal without using the cloud archive to get an as-yet unreleased version of OpenStack :-/ | 08:44 |
| tosky | I'd say that if Ubuntu Focal decided to ship an untested version of OpenStack, it's up to them to fix it to make it work | 08:46 |
| tosky | each project here can then decide to support it or not, but it can't break the official runtimes | 08:47 |
| icey | mysql8 isn't really a runtime though - is there a list anywhere about supported database backends? | 08:48 |
| tosky | good question, and I don't have an answer | 08:48 |
| tosky | worth raising that with the OpenStack TC, on IRC when there are more people around, or on the mailingt list | 08:49 |
| tosky | I'd say that the fact a certain version of a core component like mysql (and/or mariadb) is available or not with a certain release of the supported distribution may say something about the support status | 08:50 |
| tosky | but not up to m | 08:50 |
| tosky | me* | 08:50 |
| icey | worth noting that almost exactly the same bug was resolved in neutron with a fairly small change, rather than a major refactor: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/686753/ | 08:51 |
| icey | that's actually a bad example as that part ended up getting dropped from the project entirely | 08:53 |
| icey | tosky: do you think there would be acceptance of a patch that does resolve the issue with mysql8 on stable/ussuri or is that an uphill battle? | 09:02 |
| tosky | I'm not a barbican core; generally speaking, I guess it depends on how invasive it is, how it impacts the default workflow and how much it is in line with the stable policy | 09:03 |
| icey | well then, before I run off to lunch, https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/4BPpZrz28p/ is probably something like what I'd be proposing | 09:11 |
| openstackgerrit | Chris MacNaughton (icey) proposed openstack/barbican stable/ussuri: Ensure that creator_only field can be updated on mysql 8 https://review.opendev.org/757819 | 10:48 |
| *** raildo has joined #openstack-barbican | 11:42 | |
| redrobot | #startmeeting barbican | 13:00 |
| openstack | Meeting started Tue Oct 13 13:00:07 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is redrobot. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 13:00 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 13:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: barbican)" | 13:00 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'barbican' | 13:00 |
| redrobot | #topic Roll Call | 13:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Roll Call (Meeting topic: barbican)" | 13:00 | |
| redrobot | Courtesy ping for ade_lee dave-mccowan hrybacki jamespage Luzi lxkong mhen moguimar raildo rm_work xek nearyo | 13:00 |
| redrobot | As usual the agenda etherpad is here: | 13:00 |
| raildo | o/ | 13:00 |
| redrobot | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/barbican-weekly-meeting | 13:00 |
| moguimar | o/ | 13:00 |
| redrobot | There were no action items last week | 13:02 |
| redrobot | so let's go straight into the liaison updates | 13:03 |
| redrobot | #topic Liaison Updates | 13:03 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Liaison Updates (Meeting topic: barbican)" | 13:03 | |
| redrobot | moguimar, any news from Oslo? | 13:03 |
| moguimar | yep | 13:03 |
| moguimar | we have a DPL governance mode now | 13:03 |
| moguimar | which is composed of 5 people so far | 13:04 |
| redrobot | coolness | 13:05 |
| moguimar | you can check it our here | 13:05 |
| moguimar | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo#Project_Leadership_Liaisons | 13:05 |
| redrobot | still watiing until after PTG for the oslo.utils release? | 13:05 |
| moguimar | yep | 13:06 |
| redrobot | cool | 13:07 |
| redrobot | tosky, around? any news from testing? | 13:07 |
| tosky | nothing on my side | 13:08 |
| redrobot | Cool, moving on. | 13:08 |
| redrobot | #topic Kanban Review | 13:09 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Kanban Review (Meeting topic: barbican)" | 13:09 | |
| redrobot | #link https://tree.taiga.io/project/dmend-openstack-barbican/kanban | 13:09 |
| redrobot | No progress in the microversions patches (blocker for moguimar's Secret Consumers work) | 13:09 |
| redrobot | moguimar, any updates on HVAC? | 13:09 |
| moguimar | nope | 13:09 |
| redrobot | raildo, any updates on the Policy work? | 13:10 |
| raildo | redrobot, yeah, we do have some updates | 13:10 |
| raildo | we have a bit more organized patches, https://review.opendev.org/#/c/755163/ this is the first one | 13:11 |
| raildo | where we're defining the new roles/scopes that will be used on all of the APIs changes | 13:11 |
| raildo | and here is the first example of usage of it https://review.opendev.org/#/c/755875/2 on the TransportKey, still need to have the unit tests fixed, but I'm working on it | 13:12 |
| redrobot | Awesome! | 13:12 |
| raildo | so would be nice to have a feedback on the new roles definition, also if we want to deprecate some of of the older roles, we can add a deprecation note later | 13:12 |
| raildo | and any suggestion on which API calls would be nice to be implementing the default roles support next? | 13:13 |
| redrobot | probably some of the less used ones, like secret stores or quotas | 13:14 |
| raildo | redrobot, cool, I'll add those APIs to the todo list | 13:14 |
| raildo | that's all that I have for now | 13:15 |
| redrobot | cool, moving on | 13:16 |
| redrobot | #topic Bug Review | 13:16 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Bug Review (Meeting topic: barbican)" | 13:16 | |
| redrobot | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project_group/barbican | 13:16 |
| redrobot | Looks like we did get a new Story in Storyboard: | 13:16 |
| redrobot | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2008238 | 13:16 |
| redrobot | > Typo in cp command in contributor/dev doc | 13:16 |
| redrobot | Anyone want to volunteer to triage that one? | 13:17 |
| redrobot | seems like low hanging fruit for sure | 13:17 |
| *** openstackgerrit has quit IRC | 13:17 | |
| moguimar | I can champion it | 13:18 |
| moguimar | I have someone in mind to fix it =D | 13:18 |
| redrobot | Haha, nice! | 13:18 |
| redrobot | thanks moguimar! | 13:18 |
| redrobot | And it looks like no new bugs for Castellan | 13:19 |
| redrobot | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/castellan/+bugs?orderby=-id&start=0 | 13:19 |
| redrobot | #topic Wayward Reviews | 13:19 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Wayward Reviews (Meeting topic: barbican)" | 13:19 | |
| redrobot | #link https://tinyurl.com/y3ydwmkl | 13:19 |
| redrobot | looks like our 14 day patches are for stable branches | 13:20 |
| moguimar | I did a lot of patch petting yesterday | 13:20 |
| redrobot | I'm planning on spending some time this week to make sure our stable branches are in good shape | 13:20 |
| redrobot | nice moguimar! | 13:20 |
| redrobot | I' | 13:20 |
| moguimar | actually thought it was Tuesday xD | 13:21 |
| redrobot | haha | 13:21 |
| moguimar | but yeah, there are good number of patches that need a 2nd core to look at them | 13:21 |
| moguimar | and kudos to aj for putting the bandit patch together | 13:22 |
| tosky | I've seen a rechecks on the old reviews on stable/queens - I guess it was to refresh the logs | 13:23 |
| redrobot | #action redrobot to check stable branches for health | 13:24 |
| tosky | the current status is still fully described by one of the last comments in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/699186/ (which combines https://review.opendev.org/#/c/697210/ and https://review.opendev.org/#/c/695327/) | 13:24 |
| tosky | most likely a few additional fixes need to be squashed inside https://review.opendev.org/#/c/699186/ (for sure the fix for the tests using an "expired" date) | 13:26 |
| redrobot | Ah yes, the expired dates ... 5 years seemd like such a long time back then. :-P | 13:26 |
| moguimar | gotta always check for the release lifespan | 13:28 |
| tosky | couldn't those expiration dates be moved even forward in time? Like 2038, which is going to be problematic anyway? (but probably not for 64 bit systems) | 13:29 |
| redrobot | Yeah, that would work | 13:30 |
| moguimar | does 2039 breaks for 64 bits? xD | 13:30 |
| tosky | I think 64 bit time will roll-over when it won't be a problem for the humanity anymore :D | 13:31 |
| moguimar | ah good | 13:32 |
| redrobot | 🤣🤣🤣 | 13:32 |
| moguimar | I was thinking about "just put a date that we all will be retired at that time" | 13:32 |
| moguimar | "boom has been planted" Counter Strike feelings | 13:33 |
| redrobot | #topic Open Discussion | 13:34 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Open Discussion (Meeting topic: barbican)" | 13:34 | |
| redrobot | Anything else y'all want to talk about? | 13:34 |
| moguimar | not with you xD | 13:34 |
| redrobot | haha, jerk | 13:35 |
| moguimar | I'd like to ask tosky a few questions after the meeting | 13:35 |
| redrobot | 😝 | 13:35 |
| tosky | sure | 13:35 |
| redrobot | cool, sounds like it's a wrap | 13:35 |
| redrobot | thanks for joining everyone! | 13:35 |
| moguimar | but it is oslo's business | 13:35 |
| redrobot | #endmeeting | 13:35 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "OpenStack Barbican Development - Weekly Meeting Agenda: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/barbican-weekly-meeting" | 13:35 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Tue Oct 13 13:35:40 2020 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 13:35 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/barbican/2020/barbican.2020-10-13-13.00.html | 13:35 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/barbican/2020/barbican.2020-10-13-13.00.txt | 13:35 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/barbican/2020/barbican.2020-10-13-13.00.log.html | 13:35 |
| moguimar | so tosky, we came to the conclusion yesterday that using pre-commit in the gate is bad | 13:36 |
| moguimar | cause pre-commit will pull 2 repos from github | 13:36 |
| moguimar | and folks said that pulling from github in the CI is bad | 13:36 |
| tosky | oh, so not because the voting itself of pre-commit, but it's dependencies | 13:36 |
| moguimar | do you know how does our pip cache works? | 13:37 |
| moguimar | do we have local mirrors or what? | 13:37 |
| moguimar | I'm trying to convince pre-commit folks to also support installing hooks via pip, not just downloading the repo from github. | 13:37 |
| tosky | iirc we don't mirror, we have a pass-through proxy (more details on #opendev) | 13:38 |
| moguimar | voting of pre-commit is fine since we only do flake8 and a few more checks | 13:38 |
| moguimar | what is a pass-through proxy? never heard that term | 13:39 |
| tosky | a transparent proxy | 13:40 |
| tosky | caching only | 13:40 |
| tosky | I think that's what I understood | 13:40 |
| tosky | anyway, if you convince them to get stuff from pypi (which should be a matter of adding a list of dependencies and a proper setup.py, I guess), it should be fine for the opendev infrastructure | 13:42 |
| moguimar | yeah | 13:43 |
| moguimar | I'll try that road | 13:43 |
| moguimar | thanks tosky | 13:43 |
| *** openstackgerrit has joined #openstack-barbican | 14:13 | |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/barbican master: Bump py37 to py38 in tox.ini https://review.opendev.org/757371 | 14:13 |
| *** redrobot has quit IRC | 14:22 | |
| icey | heya - the failures on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/757819/ don'e seem related to my change, has anybody seen similar issues? | 14:29 |
| *** redrobot has joined #openstack-barbican | 17:27 | |
| frickler | icey: seems not even the bot generated change have been merged for ussuri https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/barbican+branch:stable/ussuri | 19:00 |
| redrobot | frickler, yeah ... the ussuri branch is in bad shape :( I'm hoping to get some time to work on it this week. | 19:22 |
| *** iurygregory has quit IRC | 20:50 | |
| *** iurygregory has joined #openstack-barbican | 20:50 | |
| *** raildo has quit IRC | 21:25 | |
| *** zigo has quit IRC | 23:23 | |
| *** tosky has quit IRC | 23:40 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!