Tuesday, 2025-04-01

f0onoonedeadpunk: considering it's just tuesday (~2 days since the distributed fip) I see about 1.5Gbps more traffic than before while the Routers have significant less context switches and overall load. They now only deal with routers (and unfortunately ipv6)06:52
noonedeadpunkhow come with ipv6?07:11
f0oipv6 is routed, so it goes though the neutron routers07:11
noonedeadpunkok, I guess it's us having ipv6 acting pretty much same as ipv4 - just a route instead of nat.07:13
f0oso you just have the tenants on the actual public vlan?07:13
f0oand have a /48 (or larger) onlink?07:13
noonedeadpunkno, not really, we have a subnet pool and a /64 added to the public vlan. and then tenants get their own /64 from subnet pool which is indeed routed07:15
noonedeadpunkbut we also don't let tenants to create ports directly in ipv4 either07:15
noonedeadpunkso public access only through fips07:16
f0obut that sounds similar to what we have07:16
noonedeadpunkyeah07:16
f0ov6 goes through the tenant router which will always make it reside/terminate on the gateway noeds07:16
f0onodes*07:16
noonedeadpunkI just got a bit confused as same applies for ipv4 for us, except it's nat and not route...07:17
f0oluckily no NAT involved but for some reason openvswitch still uses conntrack for v6 eventhough its entirely routed07:17
noonedeadpunk(or well, sometimes it;s route as well)07:17
noonedeadpunkyeah, that what's kinda surpising07:17
f0oI wonder if thats just an oversight from neutron/ovn in the flow designs since v6 can really just be stateless entirely07:18
f0owait07:18
f0oI lied07:18
f0ojust dumped my conntrack -L and only see v4 now07:19
f0omaybe it was some leftovers07:19
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Move argument parsing for dynamic_inventory to generate  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/94502507:21
noonedeadpunkok, then it feels more in line with what I'd expect to see :)07:24
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Move argument parsing for dynamic_inventory to generate  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/94502507:39
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Move argument parsing for dynamic_inventory to generate  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/94502507:43
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Move argument parsing for dynamic_inventory to generate  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/94502507:44
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Move argument parsing for dynamic_inventory to generate  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/94502508:24
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Install inventory-manage as a console_script  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/94503211:45
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Symlink console_scripts to /usr/local/bin/  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/94503311:45
noonedeadpunkjrosser: don't you accidentally have any better idea for naming scripts? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/945032/4/setup.cfg#3211:52
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: [doc] Update docs on how to use inventory scripts  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/94603011:59
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Stop skipping yaml-related rules  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/94268612:59
noonedeadpunkcan we also take a look at https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22simplify_bootstrap%22 ?13:00
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Use FQCN for modules and fix YAML issues  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/94604214:04
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Use FQCN for modules and fix YAML issues  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/94604214:06
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Stop skipping FQCN ansible-lint rule  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/94604314:08
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Stop skipping FQCN ansible-lint rule  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/94604314:45
noonedeadpunk#startmeeting openstack_ansible_meeting15:01
opendevmeetMeeting started Tue Apr  1 15:01:10 2025 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes.  The chair is noonedeadpunk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.15:01
opendevmeetUseful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.15:01
opendevmeetThe meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting'15:01
noonedeadpunk#topic rollcall15:01
noonedeadpunko/15:03
NeilHanlono/15:03
noonedeadpunk#topic office hours15:05
noonedeadpunkso I have secured a room on PTG for us on Apr 9 from 15 to 17 UTC15:06
noonedeadpunkI have not prepared etherpad with agenda though....15:06
noonedeadpunk#link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/osa-flamingo-ptg15:07
NeilHanlonwoo! 15:09
NeilHanlonthank you for doing that15:09
noonedeadpunkI will fill it with the content later today and will send a ML15:09
noonedeadpunkI failed to look into EL10 so far, unfortunatelly15:12
noonedeadpunkthough some small progress in polsihing/finalizing things15:12
NeilHanlonsame, honestly15:15
noonedeadpunk#endmeeting16:08
opendevmeetMeeting ended Tue Apr  1 16:08:01 2025 UTC.  Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)16:08
opendevmeetMinutes:        https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2025/openstack_ansible_meeting.2025-04-01-15.01.html16:08
opendevmeetMinutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2025/openstack_ansible_meeting.2025-04-01-15.01.txt16:08
opendevmeetLog:            https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2025/openstack_ansible_meeting.2025-04-01-15.01.log.html16:08
noonedeadpunkI got completely distracted during the meeting, but basically - given that coordinate release is tomorrow - we need to do some beta at very least soonish17:06
noonedeadpunkand basically - do feature freeze17:06
noonedeadpunkmgariepy: NeilHanlon jrosser can you kindly look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/945115 and all their dependencies so that I could prepare role freeze as well?17:08
noonedeadpunkdamiandabrowski: ^ :)17:16
noonedeadpunkthere're quite some patches if count for dependencies17:20
noonedeadpunkhttps://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/945089 is not so obvious one :)17:21
noonedeadpunkthanks!!!17:33
mgariepyhmm this one i guess will need 945089 merged first ? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/94509017:34
noonedeadpunkyeah17:38
noonedeadpunkand plugins as well17:39
noonedeadpunkbut I can take care of rechecks :)17:39
mgariepywill rabbitmq repos stop being a mess at some points?17:40
noonedeadpunkeh...17:40
noonedeadpunkI wonder if it's accidental or on purpose 17:40
noonedeadpunkor just lack of funding17:41
mgariepybacklog upgrading, and that's the one part that is not fun haha17:41
mgariepyhow recent version are you guys running with lxb ?17:41
noonedeadpunkI don't run lxb newer then 2023.1 tbh17:42
noonedeadpunkovs/ovn is rest17:42
mgariepyok17:42
mgariepyi do have all 3 also.17:42
mgariepybut i wonder how far i can go with lxb17:42
mgariepy2023 on 22.04 with lxb i guess? 17:43
noonedeadpunkit should be "fine" untile 2024.2 including17:43
noonedeadpunklxb is dropped in 2025.117:43
mgariepyok17:43
noonedeadpunkwe do have some ci tests for neutron with lxb17:43
mgariepydo you have a playbook to migration lxb to ovn in a 4 minutes downtime ? :)17:44
mgariepyhaha17:44
noonedeadpunklol, no, not yet17:45
noonedeadpunkfrankly lxb footprint is super limited for me atm17:45
noonedeadpunkso unlikley folks will invest smth into such migration...17:46
noonedeadpunkunless there will be ready-to-go solution17:46
mgariepyyeah17:47
mgariepyi do only have 1 cloud with lxb and it's running on top of vlan mostly, so i guess migration beside that the stuff aroud FIP and so on should be quite easy.17:47
noonedeadpunkyeah, vlan is likely relatively easy17:48
mgariepyvxlan > geneve would be something else.17:48
jrossermgariepy: we still have lxb on Dalmatian18:22
* jrosser nightmare migration…..18:22
mgariepyi can imagine18:22
mgariepynoonedeadpunk, how were you mitigating slurp upgrade before zed ? did you update the nova serviec version in db direclty ?18:57
noonedeadpunkI did yes19:11
noonedeadpunkBut Yoga -> 2023.1 is seamless19:11
mgariepywas only nova the issue i guess ?19:12
mgariepyi was planning to do : xena > zed > 2023.1 (for reasons) but i'll do yoga instead of Zed then :) haha19:14
noonedeadpunkI did Xena -> 2023.1 fwiw19:16
noonedeadpunkand yes, bumping nova rpc version in db was needed19:16
mgariepywell. i'll jump through yoga.19:17
mgariepysince it's not that long to do.19:17
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins master: Move remaining playbooks to collection  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/94508919:26
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Freeze roles for 31.0.0.0b1 release  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/94608319:49
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Use first utility host as default host for openstack_resources  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/94508519:57
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Move remaining playbooks to collection  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/94509023:57

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!