noonedeadpunk | o/ | 08:11 |
---|---|---|
damiandabrowski | hi! | 08:21 |
admin1 | \o | 08:35 |
frickler | jrosser_: how is your current view on the ceph-ansible situation? there seems to be a semi-continous flow of updates on the upstream repo, but we do experience some lag in trying to get a fix merged | 08:39 |
noonedeadpunk | frickler: we joined their slack and folks there seemed quite repsonsive | 09:58 |
noonedeadpunk | but this channel seems quite deserted since our last communication | 09:59 |
opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build stable/zed: Remove TripleO jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-python_venv_build/+/915525 | 11:37 |
frickler | noonedeadpunk: thx, that doesn't sound too promising sadly | 11:39 |
opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible unmaintained/victoria: Update .gitreview for unmaintained/victoria https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/915577 | 11:55 |
opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: reno: Update master for unmaintained/victoria https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/915578 | 11:55 |
opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible unmaintained/wallaby: Update .gitreview for unmaintained/wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/915579 | 11:55 |
opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: reno: Update master for unmaintained/wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/915580 | 11:55 |
opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible unmaintained/xena: Update .gitreview for unmaintained/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/915581 | 11:56 |
opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: reno: Update master for unmaintained/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/915582 | 11:56 |
noonedeadpunk | frickler: well, what we were told there're couple of other maintainers who wanna keep the project alive, and they're doing some active development of 8.0 release | 13:10 |
noonedeadpunk | so dunno | 13:10 |
noonedeadpunk | it's not super promising, but not dead at least now | 13:10 |
noonedeadpunk | we were also planning to step in where possible | 13:10 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova master: Ensure TLS is enabled properly for cell0 mapping DB connection https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/915320 | 13:21 |
spatel | Anybody work on FC SAN with openstack ? | 13:22 |
spatel | one of our customer has SAN storage and want to attach with openstack for HA and vm migration etc.. | 13:23 |
spatel | I don't know how does that work because SAN is just a remote disk. I think it required to run cluster filesystem on top of SAN disk right? | 13:23 |
* noonedeadpunk no idea | 14:31 | |
noonedeadpunk | I bet that should be possible actually | 14:32 |
noonedeadpunk | Like I see plenty drivers in cinder that are san-based | 14:32 |
noonedeadpunk | I think even fungible used to provide their DPUs as san... | 14:33 |
spatel | noonedeadpunk so what about glance etc? | 15:12 |
spatel | You are saying cinder will talk to SAN and create volume on SAN storage and pass it to nova to run VM right? | 15:13 |
noonedeadpunk | you said about shared storage and vm migration :D | 15:13 |
spatel | If I don't want to use cinder in that case? | 15:13 |
noonedeadpunk | I guess you need to check cinder driver list, but yes, that would be my assumption | 15:13 |
spatel | For without cinder deployment I have to create shared filesystem on top of SAN storage right? (Like GFS or NFS or gluster) | 15:15 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova master: Ensure PKI role is run idempotently for AIO metal scenario https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/915407 | 16:34 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova master: Enable deployers to force update cell mappings https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/915416 | 16:34 |
opendevreview | Jonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova master: Include PKI role only once https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/915413 | 16:53 |
opendevreview | Jonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: [doc] Document usage of user.rc file https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/915076 | 16:57 |
noonedeadpunk | jsut in case - I won't be around during next week and will mostly be without internet/driving | 17:05 |
ThiagoCMC | frickler, just to mention... I'm using ceph-ansible stable-8.0 branch in a lab to deploy Ceph 19 on both Ubuntu 24.04 and 22.04 (with Caracal/Ceph from Ubuntu's UCA). It works great! IBM is doing massive clean ups on Ceph Ansible, they recently removed ceph-nfs (which breaks even more the OSA integration) and I think are planning a new version (of ceph-nfs role). | 18:02 |
ThiagoCMC | So OSA might stick with ceph-ansible stable-7.0 for a while... | 18:03 |
ThiagoCMC | Here's how I'm using OSA 2023.2 to deploy OpenStack Bobcat with Ceph Reef: https://paste.opendev.org/show/bJXKfhUBNstPINNL4xo9/ | 18:05 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: Fix multiline yaml formatting in neutron systemd services https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/914885 | 19:44 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!