*** ysandeep|sick is now known as ysandeep | 04:37 | |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova master: Change default mode while creating directories https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/824774 | 06:13 |
---|---|---|
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins master: Add support for role list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/845690 | 06:30 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance master: Support service tokens https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance/+/823009 | 06:34 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins master: Use system-scope by default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/832837 | 06:54 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Disable service_token requirement by default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/823005 | 06:58 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance master: Support service tokens https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance/+/823009 | 07:02 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Disable service_token requirement by default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/823005 | 07:03 |
noonedeadpunk | mornings | 07:03 |
jrosser_ | good morning | 07:13 |
noonedeadpunk | hm... interesting, where does centos-release-gluster9 come from for 9 stream.... | 07:23 |
noonedeadpunk | as for some reason it's not installable on my image | 07:23 |
jrosser_ | it starts with needing this i think https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/blob/master/roles/glusterfs/vars/centos-9.yml#L16-L17 | 07:26 |
noonedeadpunk | and exactly this package fails to be isntalled | 07:26 |
noonedeadpunk | ok. it appeared after dnf update.... | 07:27 |
noonedeadpunk | so disregard | 07:27 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-config_template master: Remove orphaned releasenotes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-config_template/+/845609 | 07:27 |
jrosser_ | missing from here though i'm not sure how much i trust it https://pkgs.org/search/?q=centos-release-gluster9 | 07:28 |
noonedeadpunk | It's coming from extras-common fwiw | 07:29 |
noonedeadpunk | https://mirrors.centos.org/metalink?repo=centos-extras-sig-extras-common-$stream&arch=$basearch&protocol=https,http | 07:29 |
noonedeadpunk | And I bet smth brought in this repo with some other package update | 07:30 |
jrosser_ | i think i have a very old c9s image here which behaves oddly until i dnf update | 07:31 |
noonedeadpunk | yeah, same here | 07:32 |
noonedeadpunk | I'm likely not used that package update brings in new repos.... | 07:33 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts master: Install LXC from EPEL for CentOS Stream 9 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts/+/845693 | 07:33 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts master: Do not install COPR repo for CentOS LXC https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts/+/843672 | 07:37 |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|lunch | 07:45 | |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins master: Add support for role list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/845690 | 08:03 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins master: Use system-scope by default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/832837 | 08:04 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/ansible-config_template master: Release config-template to 1.3.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-config_template/+/845699 | 08:08 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins master: Add support for role list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/845690 | 08:45 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins master: Use system-scope by default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/832837 | 08:45 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_placement master: Support service tokens https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_placement/+/845708 | 08:58 |
*** ysandeep|lunch is now known as ysandeep | 09:14 | |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder master: Forcefully remove Cinder v2 endpoints https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder/+/845714 | 09:16 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder master: Support service tokens https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder/+/845717 | 09:30 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Disable service_token requirement by default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/823005 | 09:32 |
Mouaa | Hi guys. On a mission for an upgrade of ubuntu nodes 18.04 to 20.04 + train openstack upgrade to at least wallaby for a customer, I begin to understand difficulties due to the fact of the distro installation method (few tests, documentation, ... ) | 09:57 |
Mouaa | If I understood correctly, the only solution to switch from the distro to source method is to reinstall everything. I imagine that involves backing up everything. Is there a doc/procedure for this? | 09:58 |
jrosser_ | Mouaa: i expect that you could do it without a complete re-install | 10:12 |
jrosser_ | you are might be going to re-install the nodes from 18.04 to 20.04 anyway | 10:13 |
Mouaa | jrosser_ Indeed, We are obliged to upgrade the ubuntu nodes. But i we want to swap to source method, there isn't documentation/procedure for this? I imagine that the sequencing must be very precise | 10:17 |
jrosser_ | the documentation is kind of clear on this "The install_method variable is set during the initial deployment and you must not change it as OpenStack-Ansible is not able to convert itself from one installation method to the other" | 10:18 |
jrosser_ | but really what that means is that there is no support in the tool itself for switching between distro and source | 10:19 |
jrosser_ | you could test this out pretty easily in an all-in-one, buy deploying as distro method, then trying to work through in sequence and destroy/recreate the LXC containers as source installations by using variable overrides | 10:20 |
jrosser_ | for example keystone there is a variable here https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone/blob/stable/train/defaults/main.yml#L31 | 10:21 |
jrosser_ | and you will notice that for the train branch that is always set to "source", so i imagine you are already running keystone installed from source anyway | 10:22 |
Mouaa | <jrosser_> Thanks for the clarification | 10:38 |
jrosser_ | there should be variables like that in all the role defaults | 10:39 |
noonedeadpunk | Tbh I think for controllers conversion it would be easy | 10:39 |
noonedeadpunk | As you can just destroy container and re-create it with source method | 10:39 |
jrosser_ | yes, its really not much more than that is it | 10:39 |
noonedeadpunk | more tricky for computes/net nodes though | 10:40 |
noonedeadpunk | as there you might need to drop packages manually | 10:40 |
noonedeadpunk | but again - if you upgrade and re-install OS, it shouldn't be too tricky | 10:40 |
jrosser_ | if you empty out computes one by one and re-install them that should be OK as well | 10:40 |
jrosser_ | noonedeadpunk: we made an error in here btw https://docs.openstack.org/openstack-ansible/latest/en_GB/admin/upgrades/compatibility-matrix.html | 10:42 |
noonedeadpunk | Uh, suse | 10:43 |
jrosser_ | debian 9 stream :) | 10:43 |
noonedeadpunk | yeah... | 10:43 |
noonedeadpunk | My bad | 10:43 |
noonedeadpunk | Will push a fix for that | 10:43 |
noonedeadpunk | I should have checked result in artifacts though... | 10:44 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins master: Add support for role list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/845690 | 10:58 |
*** dviroel|out is now known as dviroel | 11:22 | |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: [doc] Fix compatability matrix layout https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/845731 | 11:32 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins master: Use system-scope by default https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/832837 | 12:00 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins master: Add support for role list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/845690 | 12:01 |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|afk | 12:15 | |
*** ysandeep|afk is now known as ysandeep | 12:30 | |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Remove usage of haproxy-endpoints role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/845739 | 12:33 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Explicitly use collection for haproxy module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/845740 | 12:35 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone master: Remove mention of haproxy-endpoints role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone/+/845741 | 12:42 |
mgariepy | https://b6fb961759099b9433ee-f8d3aa66ce3962c6e3c5c35044bdfdd4.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/845731/1/check/openstack-tox-docs/21c5e22/docs/en_GB/admin/upgrades/compatibility-matrix.html | 12:42 |
mgariepy | it's missing a couple TD there i think | 12:43 |
noonedeadpunk | yeah... | 12:46 |
mgariepy | i wonder if using table in MD would be easier to maintains. | 12:46 |
noonedeadpunk | I can recall I couldn't implement smth in md.... | 12:49 |
noonedeadpunk | maybe smth like coloring | 12:49 |
mgariepy | let me test something quickly. | 12:51 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: [doc] Fix compatability matrix layout https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/845731 | 12:54 |
noonedeadpunk | it was smth like readable vs maintainable tradeoff | 12:54 |
mgariepy | https://sublime-and-sphinx-guide.readthedocs.io/en/latest/tables.html#csv-files | 12:54 |
mgariepy | i would be nice to be able to just mimic the tables in other format. | 12:55 |
noonedeadpunk | can find how to merge cells there | 12:57 |
noonedeadpunk | ah, totally possible with grid layout... | 12:58 |
noonedeadpunk | but grid also pita to maintain kind of? | 12:59 |
mgariepy | yep i guess so. | 12:59 |
mgariepy | or we generate the file with a script ? | 13:00 |
noonedeadpunk | nope, just edit html manually | 13:01 |
noonedeadpunk | well it's not _that_ bad if use wysiwyg for html... | 13:02 |
noonedeadpunk | At least now looks not that bad https://815896f084e866f51698-f734581470945d848d2e1e75c1fa1768.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/845731/2/check/openstack-tox-docs/9500bd0/docs/admin/upgrades/compatibility-matrix.html | 13:15 |
mgariepy | yep looks good indeed. | 13:17 |
mgariepy | maybe we could just add comments in the html to help us a bit | 13:18 |
noonedeadpunk | oh yes, I was thinking about comments as well just now | 13:18 |
mgariepy | haha would be easier to implement than to rewrite the stuff. | 13:19 |
mgariepy | i'll patch it up. | 13:19 |
noonedeadpunk | but faced that not sure how to make them really helpfull... | 13:19 |
noonedeadpunk | so yeah, if you have ideas - super welcome | 13:19 |
opendevreview | Marc Gariépy proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: add comments to make editing the table clearer https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/845758 | 13:43 |
mgariepy | so what do you think ? | 13:46 |
mgariepy | this way when we add support for rockylinux 9, we would be able to add the extra column with sed :) haha | 13:47 |
noonedeadpunk | oh man. it's really good. | 13:47 |
mgariepy | low tech ftw | 13:48 |
noonedeadpunk | I also somehow broke Glance NFS test | 14:16 |
noonedeadpunk | likely with https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance/commit/887a59256eeba7a346b63d5c0db6d1f909d6b26c | 14:17 |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|out | 14:25 | |
noonedeadpunk | oh damn | 14:30 |
noonedeadpunk | seems that default is trying to be compiled when it should not be | 14:30 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance master: Fix glance mounts compatability https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance/+/845767 | 14:36 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance master: Support service tokens https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance/+/823009 | 14:36 |
jrosser_ | oh yes that is kind of unfortunate | 14:40 |
noonedeadpunk | yeah ( | 14:40 |
jrosser_ | i've had similar before where it was good to define a task vars: with some stuff in it | 14:40 |
jrosser_ | and then use ternary, the task var is only evaluated f it actually gets used that way | 14:41 |
opendevreview | Jesse Pretorius proposed openstack/ansible-config_template master: [WIP] Add more complete examples with sample output https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-config_template/+/845768 | 14:41 |
jrosser_ | odyssey4me: if you are poking around config_template we were talking about how to support 'sysctl' style config files the other day | 14:42 |
odyssey4me | o/ jrosser_ noonedeadpunk :) I noticed the docs for config_template are rather sparse... it doesn't sell too well. I thought I'd add some examples, which can hopefully be extended in the future. | 14:42 |
jrosser_ | like ini but no [sections] | 14:42 |
odyssey4me | hrm, doesn't it already? I thought that was added for MariaDB at some point | 14:43 |
noonedeadpunk | nah, it wasn't at the end I believe | 14:43 |
noonedeadpunk | as we parent template from Ansible that can not do that | 14:43 |
noonedeadpunk | And I believe I finally need to publish config_template in galaxy as well... | 14:44 |
mgariepy | jamesdenton, we need this one first :D https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/845731/2 | 14:46 |
noonedeadpunk | I also kind of fail to understand what;s wrong with nmap isntallation for ironic tempest role | 14:47 |
noonedeadpunk | As locally I didn't have any issue with installing it.... | 14:47 |
jrosser_ | that for centos-9-s ? | 14:48 |
noonedeadpunk | and 8-s | 14:48 |
noonedeadpunk | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic/+/831544 as example | 14:49 |
jrosser_ | maybe we shuld just recheck it | 14:51 |
jrosser_ | becasue we switched to the infra mirrors recently | 14:51 |
noonedeadpunk | yeah, maybe.. | 14:51 |
jrosser_ | though that doesnt explain 8 though..... | 14:51 |
noonedeadpunk | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic/+/844021/2 was rechecked more recently... | 14:51 |
noonedeadpunk | but there only 9 fails... | 14:52 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic master: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic/+/835709 | 14:52 |
jrosser_ | "Status code was -1 and not [200]: Request failed: <urlopen error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>", "redirected": false, "status": -1, "url": "https://opendev.org/openstack/rally-openstack/raw/branch/master/upper-constraints.txt" | 14:52 |
jrosser_ | thats different | 14:53 |
noonedeadpunk | yeah, agree | 14:53 |
jrosser_ | i think i had some comment on your "dont run rally everywhere" patch | 14:53 |
noonedeadpunk | I rebased yet another change that's super dummy to check | 14:53 |
noonedeadpunk | ah | 14:53 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/xena: Install rally only when rally_install is set https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/845684 | 14:54 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/wallaby: Install rally only when rally_install is set https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/845685 | 14:55 |
noonedeadpunk | jrosser_: thanks for pingng | 14:56 |
jrosser_ | why did the ironic patch fail on getting rally u-c if we already merge the one to stop deploying it | 14:56 |
jrosser_ | oh oops `rally_install: yes` of course | 14:57 |
jrosser_ | yeah so for 840685 i think i didnt see it run tempest, but lets see what the new logs say | 14:59 |
noonedeadpunk | Ithink you're right | 15:00 |
noonedeadpunk | But still loved to have logs to see why :) | 15:00 |
noonedeadpunk | #startmeeting openstack_ansible_meeting | 15:00 |
opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Jun 14 15:00:57 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is noonedeadpunk. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:00 |
opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:00 |
opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting' | 15:00 |
noonedeadpunk | #topic roll call | 15:01 |
noonedeadpunk | I'm on meeting for next several mins just in case | 15:01 |
damiandabrowski[m] | hey! I'm semi-available this week as we're dealing with major incident | 15:02 |
noonedeadpunk | #topic office hours | 15:05 |
noonedeadpunk | So we need to release next week | 15:05 |
mgariepy | hey /o | 15:05 |
noonedeadpunk | Before branching I think we might have at least 1 topic to cover | 15:06 |
noonedeadpunk | which is https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:osa%252Fservice_tokens | 15:06 |
noonedeadpunk | I think it should be passing now... And hopefully it does right thing.. | 15:07 |
noonedeadpunk | Another thing I pushed is https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:osa%252Fmanage_lb which is basically clean-up | 15:08 |
admin1 | partly here \o | 15:08 |
noonedeadpunk | But with that I wonder, if instead of just disabling haproxy backends, we should just set them to drain? | 15:09 |
noonedeadpunk | Whould we great to set drain and then disable, but dunno how to do that... | 15:09 |
mgariepy | draining connection from galera takes a long time. | 15:10 |
noonedeadpunk | Well, it's equal to connection timeout I believe | 15:10 |
noonedeadpunk | But as we do before running role... It might be not that bad. And previously we were just disabling... | 15:11 |
noonedeadpunk | So I guess that draining at least smth is better then just dropping at once? | 15:11 |
noonedeadpunk | And also I'm thinking about rest of services, not only galera | 15:11 |
mgariepy | not sure it does make a big difference. | 15:12 |
noonedeadpunk | Yeah, maybe you're right | 15:12 |
mgariepy | for galera the only used node is the first one anyway | 15:12 |
mgariepy | when it's drop, they switch to the second node. and when it comes back then the fallback. | 15:13 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible master: [doc] Fix compatability matrix layout https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/845731 | 15:13 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible master: add comments to make editing the table clearer https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/845758 | 15:13 |
noonedeadpunk | well, yeah... | 15:14 |
noonedeadpunk | so should I update to disable to be consistent? | 15:15 |
jrosser_ | having that external role for only the galera playbook not so good, agree to remove that | 15:15 |
mgariepy | currenlty services tolerate db disconnect a lot better than they used to. | 15:16 |
noonedeadpunk | I wish they did same for rabbit... | 15:17 |
noonedeadpunk | anyway | 15:17 |
mgariepy | well. or memcached | 15:17 |
noonedeadpunk | the problem is that now galera backend will be disabled regardles if changes are required which kind of not neat | 15:18 |
noonedeadpunk | so tried to be as tolerant as possible... | 15:18 |
noonedeadpunk | but for other services external role was keeping backend when it could be broken so... | 15:19 |
spatel | sorry little late in meeting just trying to catching up with haproxy discussion, why do we need to drain connection? | 15:24 |
spatel | remove galera from haproxy? | 15:25 |
noonedeadpunk | nah, it was more that when you run playbook, in advance you drain connection just in case | 15:26 |
spatel | oh! we are using F5 so never looked at haproxy. but curious why need to drain them? what are we going to gain? | 15:28 |
mgariepy | drain will continue to send health-check. | 15:28 |
mgariepy | disable won't i guess | 15:28 |
noonedeadpunk | yup, that's mostly the difference | 15:29 |
spatel | also curious why are we not using conntrackd with keepalived/haproxy, it will keep all connection in sync between keepalived | 15:30 |
spatel | we are running conntrackd in production with keepalived and it works great | 15:30 |
mgariepy | but. well it's for the whole galera backend do drain might recover faster ? | 15:31 |
noonedeadpunk | Another topic - during summit there was interest from different parties on reviving ceph-ansible. | 15:36 |
noonedeadpunk | The main question is about governance of it afterwards | 15:36 |
noonedeadpunk | hopefully, we can un-deprecate it given contributions to it. | 15:37 |
mgariepy | who will be working on it? | 15:37 |
noonedeadpunk | except us (and I hope BBC:)) interest was raisen by 23Tech and vexxhost. It's obviously won't be RedHat | 15:39 |
noonedeadpunk | right now we're in stage of gathering other interested to contribute parties | 15:39 |
noonedeadpunk | and we agreed to start doing more active steps in July | 15:40 |
mgariepy | ok nice then :) | 15:40 |
noonedeadpunk | but I really hope that repo can stay under their governance at least, as otherwise things can get messy... | 15:41 |
noonedeadpunk | I believe JP reached them with some suggestions. | 15:41 |
noonedeadpunk | But will see were it all will end up | 15:42 |
mgariepy | yeah obviously but if it works it would be awesome :D | 15:43 |
mgariepy | as it kinda work really well in my limited experience with it. | 15:44 |
admin1 | i used it in a lot of clusters .. it works very well | 15:44 |
mgariepy | also not a big fan of docker stuff.. | 15:44 |
admin1 | too bad that its deprecated and there is no similar tool | 15:44 |
noonedeadpunk | yeah, it appeared there's more not docker fans | 15:45 |
noonedeadpunk | I have heard that cephadm can deploy on bare metal, but never researched that | 15:45 |
noonedeadpunk | (and was pretty sure it can't | 15:45 |
admin1 | ceph-ansible does not use docker or any containers .. | 15:46 |
admin1 | its on bare metal | 15:46 |
admin1 | though you can also have it use containers | 15:46 |
noonedeadpunk | ceph-ansible actually has support for docker | 15:46 |
noonedeadpunk | yeah | 15:46 |
mgariepy | did you had time to start asking nicely monty about 22.04 for lts mariadb ? | 15:52 |
noonedeadpunk | uh, no, sorry. My first working day in 2 weeks today. And started from total internal crap... | 15:56 |
* noonedeadpunk goes now :P | 15:56 | |
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|lunch | 15:58 | |
opendevreview | Jesse Pretorius proposed openstack/ansible-config_template master: [WIP] Add more complete examples with sample output https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-config_template/+/845768 | 15:58 |
admin1 | i am encountering a strange issue .. may be nothing to do with OSA .. but since I only use OSA , asking here anyway .. I have ceph as object storage and osa points to ceph .. i can create buckets and upload/download objects on it .. the issue is when I set a bucket to public, if I click the link, the link gives NoSuckBucket | 15:59 |
admin1 | (https://cloud.domain.com:8080/swift/v1/AUTH_8022c6328c8949bda2ff928295240a6a/test) -- test is the bucket name .. configs here: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/a1git/9f58a83cc142b85c2675d8b5678af009/raw/d1676fd8ec077fe34cbf379cd02a6aec7eeac046/gistfile1.txt | 15:59 |
noonedeadpunk | admin1: there was totally a bug in Luminous or smth like that on rbd side | 16:00 |
noonedeadpunk | *rgw | 16:00 |
noonedeadpunk | So basically for OSA Victoria | 16:00 |
admin1 | i am on pacific | 16:01 |
noonedeadpunk | The only solution I was able to get is just upgrade Ceph.... | 16:01 |
noonedeadpunk | Huh | 16:01 |
admin1 | osa and ceph both were installed independently using osa and ceph-ansible | 16:01 |
noonedeadpunk | On Pacific it worked nicely.... | 16:01 |
admin1 | if anyone has the same setup, a quick copy/paste of the endpoint list and maybe ceph.conf or rgw.conf might help ( ips and secrets removed ofcourse) | 16:03 |
noonedeadpunk | at glance config looks good | 16:11 |
noonedeadpunk | I don't think though it would allow to list directories anyway... But not 100% sure | 16:12 |
noonedeadpunk | yeah, it does.... | 16:13 |
noonedeadpunk | I have created https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-28842 for CentOS. For ubuntu will be only with next release. | 16:28 |
noonedeadpunk | #nedmeeting | 16:28 |
noonedeadpunk | #endmeeting | 16:28 |
opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Jun 14 16:28:12 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 16:28 |
opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2022/openstack_ansible_meeting.2022-06-14-15.00.html | 16:28 |
opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2022/openstack_ansible_meeting.2022-06-14-15.00.txt | 16:28 |
opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2022/openstack_ansible_meeting.2022-06-14-15.00.log.html | 16:28 |
jrosser_ | admin1: when you say "if I click the link" do you mean in horizon, or put the link in a browser, or wget maybe? which of these works/breaks? | 16:35 |
opendevreview | Jesse Pretorius proposed openstack/ansible-config_template master: [WIP] Add more complete examples with sample output https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-config_template/+/845768 | 16:40 |
opendevreview | Jonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Bump ansible-core to 2.13.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/842387 | 16:42 |
opendevreview | Jesse Pretorius proposed openstack/ansible-config_template master: [WIP] Add more complete examples with sample output https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-config_template/+/845768 | 16:49 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Create containers for rally/tempest independently https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/840685 | 17:05 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server master: Remove mention of haproxy-endpoints role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server/+/845787 | 17:08 |
admin1 | browser, curl, wget -- same | 17:09 |
admin1 | no such bucket | 17:09 |
jrosser_ | hmm well it'a working here | 17:17 |
*** dviroel|lunch is now known as dviroel | 17:17 | |
opendevreview | Jonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins master: Use shlex_quote from ansible module_utils rather than SSH plugin https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-plugins/+/845792 | 17:40 |
opendevreview | Jonathan Rosser proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Bump ansible-core to 2.13.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/842387 | 17:41 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova master: Remove mention of haproxy-endpoints role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_nova/+/845793 | 17:42 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder master: Remove mention of haproxy-endpoints role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder/+/845794 | 17:46 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/ansible-role-uwsgi master: Remove mention of haproxy-endpoints role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-uwsgi/+/845795 | 17:49 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance master: Remove mention of haproxy-endpoints role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance/+/845796 | 17:50 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance master: Remove mention of haproxy-endpoints role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance/+/845796 | 17:51 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_placement master: Remove mention of haproxy-endpoints role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_placement/+/845797 | 17:52 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_masakari master: Remove mention of haproxy-endpoints role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_masakari/+/845798 | 17:53 |
jrosser_ | i fugure we are about to find which roles are broken for centos-9 / jammy | 17:54 |
noonedeadpunk | we are | 17:56 |
noonedeadpunk | tomorrow I will push changes to all roles anyway... | 17:57 |
noonedeadpunk | The worst part is we lack time fixing them :( | 17:57 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_mistral master: Remove mention of haproxy-endpoints role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_mistral/+/845800 | 17:58 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila master: Remove mention of haproxy-endpoints role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila/+/845801 | 18:01 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_mistral master: Remove mention of haproxy-endpoints role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_mistral/+/845800 | 18:01 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance master: Remove mention of haproxy-endpoints role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance/+/845796 | 18:02 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_placement master: Remove mention of haproxy-endpoints role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_placement/+/845797 | 18:02 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder master: Remove mention of haproxy-endpoints role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder/+/845794 | 18:02 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/ansible-role-uwsgi master: Remove mention of haproxy-endpoints role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-uwsgi/+/845795 | 18:02 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_masakari master: Remove mention of haproxy-endpoints role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_masakari/+/845798 | 18:03 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_murano master: Remove mention of haproxy-endpoints role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_murano/+/845802 | 18:05 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zun master: Remove mention of haproxy-endpoints role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_zun/+/845803 | 18:06 |
noonedeadpunk | So, recently rebased Ironic failed with nmap as well https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic/+/835709 | 18:08 |
noonedeadpunk | weird though is only ironic fails this way | 18:10 |
noonedeadpunk | and we don't do anything weird in the role itself... | 18:12 |
mgariepy | do you have a recheck ? | 18:21 |
mgariepy | maybe it's only a timing issue on the infra mirror or something. | 18:21 |
noonedeadpunk | That's like 3-rd or 4rth issue. First one I saw on 4th of June | 18:30 |
noonedeadpunk | ok, first one nmap was on May 20 | 18:31 |
noonedeadpunk | and only for ironic | 18:31 |
mgariepy | hmm. should we ask for a hold on this one then ? | 18:33 |
noonedeadpunk | I'd say it's worth it... As I couldn't reproduce locally... | 18:34 |
noonedeadpunk | And don't see what's wrong actually | 18:34 |
noonedeadpunk | But I need to head out now as it was terrible day/night... | 18:34 |
opendevreview | Marc Gariépy proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: DNM nmap c9s test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/845804 | 18:35 |
mgariepy | sure no worries. | 18:35 |
mgariepy | i'll try to dig a bit on it for nmap stuff | 18:36 |
noonedeadpunk | to have that said - we isntall nmap for all jobs, as it's part of tempest | 18:36 |
noonedeadpunk | https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/src/branch/master/vars/redhat-8.yml#L21 | 18:37 |
mgariepy | hmm what does ironic do then :/ | 18:38 |
noonedeadpunk | from what I see - nothing specific.... | 18:39 |
mgariepy | hmm ok | 18:39 |
noonedeadpunk | Well, maybe things go south when deploying dnsmasq or smth.... | 18:39 |
mgariepy | i'll take a look see if i spot it. | 18:39 |
noonedeadpunk | Another thing I can suppose is that vars file for yum somehow becomes missing | 18:39 |
noonedeadpunk | but then all package isntallation would fail... | 18:39 |
noonedeadpunk | And we somehow don't gather content of /etc/yum/ | 18:40 |
noonedeadpunk | (or there's nothing which would be weird... | 18:40 |
opendevreview | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Add tempest repos to required-repos https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/834289 | 18:45 |
mgariepy | really look like the dnsmask is causing some issue. | 18:54 |
mgariepy | https://storage.gra.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_7d3/835709/3/check/openstack-ansible-deploy-aio_metal-centos-9-stream/7d3b557/logs/openstack/instance-info/host_dns_info_16-20-37.log.txt | 19:00 |
mgariepy | https://storage.gra.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_7d3/835709/3/check/openstack-ansible-deploy-aio_metal-centos-9-stream/7d3b557/logs/host/ironic-inspector-dnsmasq.service.journal-16-21-23.log.txt | 19:02 |
mgariepy | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/7d3b55790eea4af085e3426df67c7dd7/log/logs/openstack/instance-info/host_networkd_status_16-20-37.log.txt#10 | 19:04 |
mgariepy | ironic dnsmasq does give an ip, which swap the dns server/ | 19:05 |
noonedeadpunk | uh | 19:17 |
noonedeadpunk | and yeah, changes to dnsmasq were landed recently | 19:17 |
mgariepy | well the device shouldn't ask for an ip via dhcp i guess.. | 19:18 |
jrosser_ | mgariepy: there’s a gateway via eth15 - is that right? | 19:24 |
mgariepy | well it does go from carrier to routable once the ip i set via dnsmasq | 19:29 |
mgariepy | 72.29.228.1 on eth15 | 19:31 |
mgariepy | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/7d3b55790eea4af085e3426df67c7dd7/log/logs/openstack/instance-info/host_networkd_status_16-20-37.log.txt#26 | 19:33 |
mgariepy | jrosser_, i guess it's not supposed to happen.. but why does eth15 ask for an ip via dhcp ? | 19:34 |
mgariepy | Network manager seems to be doing some desktopish stuff there | 19:42 |
mgariepy | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/7d3b55790eea4af085e3426df67c7dd7/log/logs/host/messages.txt#37814 | 19:51 |
mgariepy | late enough for me today. not sure how to fix that, we do have 2 services that are managing network on centos.. .. so it's kinda bad. | 19:53 |
mgariepy | c9s and c8s does have the same issue, rockylinux is some file not found : https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/aa9b832e4f11408abec2d41e723702a1/log/job-output.txt#13813 | 19:55 |
jrosser_ | oh I already made a patch to os_ironic for that | 19:57 |
mgariepy | for the shim i guess .. :) | 19:58 |
mgariepy | the networkmanager stuff is anoying haha | 19:58 |
mgariepy | and ofcourse it didn't merge because of the networknamager issue.. | 20:07 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Remove usage of haproxy-endpoints role https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/845739 | 20:31 |
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|afk | 20:46 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!