Monday, 2021-12-06

opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila master: Disable CentOS check  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila/+/82044707:53
opendevreviewJames Gibson proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Add documentation of security improvements made to Openstack Ansible  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82037008:34
opendevreviewJames Gibson proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Add documentation of security improvements made to Openstack Ansible  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82037008:38
* noonedeadpunk commenting ^ atm08:44
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila master: Disable CentOS check  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila/+/82044708:58
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila master: Use config_template as a collection  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila/+/81986108:59
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila master: Refactor galera_use_ssl behaviour  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila/+/81023708:59
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila master: Refactor definition of lock path  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila/+/81980208:59
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila master: Database connection pooling improvements  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila/+/82023509:00
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila master: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila/+/82043309:00
mgoddardhi evrardjp, sorry I missed your recent message. What's up?10:20
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: Drop designate notifications topic  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/81931410:54
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Reduce ceph memory overhead for AIO by setting is_hci to true  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82041710:57
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts stable/ussuri: Add CentOS 8.4 support  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts/+/81848811:18
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts stable/victoria: Add CentOS 8.4 support  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts/+/81848711:18
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Do not fail when nova console is disabled  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82019211:19
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/ansible-role-systemd_service master: Add integrated linters test  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_service/+/79903711:35
noonedeadpunklet's merge manila patches and I will proceed with branching asap https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila+status:open+label:Verified12:18
noonedeadpunkjrosser: would you mind if around?:)12:18
jrossersure12:22
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_octavia master: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_octavia/+/82043912:22
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/wallaby: Pin uWSGI version  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82050412:28
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/wallaby: Pin uWSGI version  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82050412:29
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/victoria: Pin uWSGI version  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82050512:29
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/victoria: Pin uWSGI version  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82050512:29
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/ussuri: Pin uWSGI version  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82050612:30
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/ussuri: Pin uWSGI version  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82050612:30
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/wallaby: Bump OpenStack-Ansible Wallaby  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82052914:46
spatelnoonedeadpunk how do i find how which mysql cluster nodes in cluster - https://paste.opendev.org/show/811482/14:49
spatellook like my galera not in good state14:49
noonedeadpunk`wsrep_incoming_addresses` shoudl contain list of IPs of the clusterm members14:51
spatelout of 3 nodes i have one node showing all 3 in this example - https://paste.opendev.org/show/811483/14:52
spatelhow do i know which nodes is out of cluster because my cluster size is 2 currently 14:52
noonedeadpunkwell, that node says `wsrep_cluster_size: 0`14:53
spatel0 means its outside cluster pool correct?14:53
noonedeadpunkyeah14:54
spatellet me restart that node..14:54
noonedeadpunkand wsrep_ready is OFF for it14:54
spatelwe had large DDoS caused partition in cluster 14:54
spatelI am seeing wsrep_ready is OFF on all 3 nodes 14:54
opendevreviewJames Gibson proposed openstack/ansible-role-uwsgi master: Add support for TLS to UWSGI  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-uwsgi/+/82053214:55
noonedeadpunktbh I'd check which node has latest state which I think is done with `wsrep_last_committed` but not 100% sure14:55
spatelwsrep_last_committed is same on all 3 nodes 14:55
spatellet me restart mariadb on node which has cluster size zero ( 0 ) 14:56
noonedeadpunkand /var/lib/mysql/grastate.dat has -1 in seqno?14:57
noonedeadpunkas it feels like you might have split brain right now14:57
spatelyes DDoS split my network 14:58
noonedeadpunkso I'd tried to find out what member has latest data and tried to re-bootstrap from it most likely14:58
spatelall of my nodes has seqno:   -1  in grastate.dat 14:59
noonedeadpunkit probably would be the one that has haproxy being routed to as "master"14:59
spatelits node 2 in my case 14:59
spatelnoonedeadpunk when i restart 3rd node i got this error - https://paste.opendev.org/show/811484/15:02
spatelshould i remove  /var/lib/mysql/grastate.dat  and then restart?15:04
noonedeadpunksorry in a meeting15:15
noonedeadpunkis your networking actually fine now?15:34
noonedeadpunkor cluster members are still not reachable between each other15:35
noonedeadpunkum, no, see no reason to remove grastate15:35
spatelThis is what i did, rename  /var/lib/mysql/grastate.dat and run galera_new_cluster15:41
spatelall good now15:41
spatelcluster is back and running15:42
noonedeadpunkoh, well, you could place safe_to_bootstrap: 1 but you must do this on the node with latest state only15:46
spatelall nodes has seqno: -1 so i assuming all nodes are latest 15:53
spatel+ i have LB pointing to nodes-2 for write so in my case node-2 is latest and greatest 15:53
spatelthat is what i did on node-215:54
spatelI didn't set safe_to_bootstrap: 1 in file but just delete that file. (i think that is ok correct?)15:54
spatelnow my rabbitMQ is dead :)15:55
spatelwhat a mess 15:55
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Reduce manila CI check memory consumption  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82001016:00
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/victoria: Bump OpenStack-Ansible Victoria  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82054716:02
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts stable/ussuri: Always upgrade ca-certificates  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts/+/81968916:06
spatelnoonedeadpunk i am trying to upgrade rabbitMQ on stein release so i bump version to 3.8.14 and i git this error when re-building cluster - https://paste.opendev.org/show/811487/16:15
spatelrabbitmqctl -q cluster_status | paste -sd '' - | sed 's/ //g' | grep -oP '(?<={cluster_name,<<\").*(?=\">>})'16:16
spatelno output16:16
spatelmay be i need to change something in playbook which not able to extracting new output.. damn it16:18
noonedeadpunkoh, well, yes, 3.8 changed output a lot16:18
spatelyes16:18
spateli noticed that16:18
spateltrying to see if i can change that in playbook16:18
spatelor better i should stick to 3.7 :(16:18
spatelor edit playbook to do rabbitmqctl -q cluster_status | sed 's/ //g' | grep -oP '(?<=Clustername:).*'16:20
noonedeadpunkI won't suggest later role version as might be we already using collection there...16:20
spateli can just edit this file to fix this issue correct - shell: rabbitmqctl -q cluster_status | sed 's/ //g' | grep -oP '(?<=Clustername:).*'16:21
spatelotherwise it should work 16:21
noonedeadpunkyeah, you can16:22
spateldone.. re-running play16:22
spatelthat works! 16:27
spatelI am also going to remove HA by hand to see how does it behave (because ansible does support non-HA cluster)16:28
spatelwhat do you suggest of vm_memory_high_watermark, 0.2  setting16:30
spatelshould i change this to 0.4 ?16:30
noonedeadpunkum, but in cotnainer by default available 100% of controller node memory?16:38
noonedeadpunkunless you've set extra limits with cgroups16:38
noonedeadpunkits good to adjust if you have standalone rabbit nodes, that's true16:53
*** sshnaidm is now known as sshnaidm|afk17:25
opendevreviewJames Gibson proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server master: Add option to force encryption of all health checks over SSL  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server/+/82057217:25
noonedeadpunkwe should defenitely finish uwsgi for neutron....17:29
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: Implement uWSGI for neutron-api  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/48615617:29
noonedeadpunkI really wonder what's wrong there ....17:29
noonedeadpunkas neutron runs uwsgi in devstack...17:30
mgariepynoonedeadpunk, is that reprocucible on a specific  test/distro ?17:34
mgariepyhoo. august..17:35
mgariepylet's wait on the new result ahah17:35
jrosserthe patch is from 2017 :/17:38
jrossersomehow all this time it still doesn't work in an obvious way17:38
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila master: Disable CentOS check  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila/+/82044717:47
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila master: Use config_template as a collection  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila/+/81986117:51
noonedeadpunkwhile I can imagine in 2017 uwsgi was not that common, in 2021 it must work for sure....18:20
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible stable/ussuri: Pin uWSGI version  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82050618:26
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible stable/victoria: Pin uWSGI version  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82050518:29
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila master: Database connection pooling improvements  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila/+/82023518:41
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila master: Refactor definition of lock path  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila/+/81980218:41
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila master: Updated from OpenStack Ansible Tests  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila/+/82043318:41
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible stable/wallaby: Pin uWSGI version  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82050418:41
jrosserah something is wrong with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila/+/81023718:49
noonedeadpunkyeah just spotted (18:49
noonedeadpunkalready rebasing (18:49
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila master: Refactor galera_use_ssl behaviour  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila/+/81023718:52
noonedeadpunkdamn 2 more hours(19:03
noonedeadpunkum, neutron failed now with `qemu-kvm: allocate 1018329600 bytes for jit buffer: Cannot allocate memory` doh19:04
noonedeadpunk(nova-compute failed on neutron uwsgi patch to be specific)19:05
noonedeadpunkwell, fair, considering I haven't limited that...19:06
jrosserthat's like 1G?19:06
noonedeadpunkyeah, it is....19:07
noonedeadpunkwe don't have such flavors though...19:10
noonedeadpunkfor neutron I believe default is applied which is https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/src/branch/master/defaults/main.yml#L28619:10
noonedeadpunkstill 512 is too much though19:10
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Reduce neutron WSGI workers for CI  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82058619:11
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: Implement uWSGI for neutron-api  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/48615619:12
noonedeadpunkif all this tie it was just oom....19:13
noonedeadpunk*time19:13
opendevreviewMerged openstack/ansible-role-systemd_service master: Add integrated linters test  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-systemd_service/+/79903719:14
noonedeadpunkshould we also merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts/+/819689 for U before EMing?19:14
mgariepyyes please :D19:15
noonedeadpunkgreat!19:16
noonedeadpunkoh, damn, it's actually 4 hours for manila to merge :( well, then going to sleep in the meanwhile...19:19
spatelwelcome - https://blog.centos.org/2021/12/introducing-centos-stream-9/19:19
noonedeadpunkmeh19:19
mgariepyer.19:19
noonedeadpunkdamn it, nodepool already have image....19:20
noonedeadpunkI wonder how badly will it fail....19:20
mgariepylol.19:20
mgariepyif you know you will have to fix it.. ;p19:20
noonedeadpunkwell, at least we have redhat-8 somewhere which doesn't cout really...19:21
noonedeadpunk*count19:21
noonedeadpunkso currently it's rhel beta, or?:))19:22
noonedeadpunkisn't it's 2 more days before release? https://centos.org/stream9/19:23
noonedeadpunkah, lol, disregard19:23
spatellol19:25
spateli am still confused in centos how does versioning works? 19:26
mgariepyhttps://xkcd.com/2224/19:27
spatelheh19:28
mgariepyisn't stream only for beta testing for rhel and at some point stuff get merged in rhel from stream(?not quite sure when/how or why) ?19:29
spatelyes stream is QA/Staging environment for RHEL release19:30
spatelfedora ---> stream ----> RHEL 19:31
spateli won't recommend to not deploy it in production, we never know when redhat change policy 19:32
spatelSorry (IBM) 19:33
spatelWhat is the status of Rocky Linux? 19:33
noonedeadpunknobody cares I think)19:34
noonedeadpunkbut _if_ it is compatible - it should just work19:34
noonedeadpunkas it's reported as ansible_os_family as redhat19:35
noonedeadpunkbut we can't know since there're no CI images and probably won't ever be19:35
spatelafter CentOS EOL people we start moving to Rocky Linux 19:36
noonedeadpunkI honestly put more trust in almalinux tbh, since CloudLinux haven't failed me previously19:37
noonedeadpunkand they have good experience and team tbh...19:37
noonedeadpunkand it's whole their business that standed on CentOS19:37
noonedeadpunkand they have ELevate :D19:38
spatelnever heard this name before "almalinux" 19:38
noonedeadpunkhttps://almalinux.org/elevate19:38
noonedeadpunkwhich allow to upgrade between centos major versions19:39
mgariepyfirst time i heard you can upgrade between major release ! :P19:39
spatellol19:40
noonedeadpunkwell, I heard about them as I used several of products from their maintainers pretty successfully. https://www.kernelcare.com/ was made by them but sold afterwards :(19:40
noonedeadpunkand they sold it for $1 per server :P19:41
noonedeadpunk(per month ofc)19:41
noonedeadpunkoh, wait, no, it hasn't been sold lol19:42
noonedeadpunktixcare appears to be owned by cloudlinux19:42
noonedeadpunk*tuxcare19:42
mgariepyon paper it seems nice. but not rebooting a server for 4 year then a power outage do happen. do not seem fun to me :)19:42
noonedeadpunkwe had uptime for 1000+days lol))19:43
mgariepyyep then it too 3 days to reboot the damn server !19:43
noonedeadpunkBut it's more about - urgent security flaw is found and you need to reboot your all your computes in a week....19:43
noonedeadpunkIt's soo cheaper to jsut do planned upgrades say once a year...19:44
mgariepydepending on the setup it might not be too long to remove load from servers .19:45
noonedeadpunkdepending on the amount of servers)19:45
mgariepybut it depends on the usecase.19:45
noonedeadpunkas abvoisuly you should have tons of internal stuff that must be upgraded as well19:45
noonedeadpunk*obviously19:45
noonedeadpunkbut whatever)19:45
mgariepyyeah19:45
noonedeadpunkThey also have extended support for dead OS, like they still provide patches for centos 6 :D19:46
noonedeadpunkor ubuntu xenial19:47
noonedeadpunkAnd it's sooo much cheaper they buy from canonical their advantage...19:47
noonedeadpunk*then19:48
mgariepyhehe.19:48
spatelcan we run infra nodes on ubuntu and compute on CentOS? 20:28
mgariepyi guess you could.20:29
spatelhmm 20:29
spateli have 300 nodes cluster running centOS (thinking to migrate to Ubunut) 20:29
mgariepyi guess that it's not muck worst that when you do the upgrade20:29
mgariepylike major ubuntu upgrade. 20:30
spatelbut may be mixing OS will bring some odd 20:30
mgariepyhmm20:32
mgariepyyou would do controller 1 by 1 ? 20:33
mgariepyprobably best to test it in dev.20:33
spatelI am thinking buy hardware and build 3 node controller using ubunut and then slowly migrate compute one by one20:34
spatelthat is easy and simple 20:34
mgariepymigrate vms ?20:35
mgariepylike live migration or something like that ?20:35
spatelyes migrate them, we don't have Ceph storage. 20:35
spatelWe are running voice application and we don't store data 20:36
mgariepyif your flavor have ephemeral storage you might need to adjust some stuff20:36
spateli can delete vm and create on new cluster 20:36
mgariepyho.20:36
mgariepyeasy then i guess ! :D20:36
spatelall my vms running on local-storage 20:36
spatelwe are just use cpu/network to run voice 20:37
mgariepyyes local storage might be ok since it does start off from a qemu file backed by the glance image (in case of ephemeral nova will create the backing file on the compute) and between 16>18 upgrade the options for creating this file changed 20:39
mgariepyso both files are not compatible. 20:39
spateloh! wait i am not following you.. what is backing file?20:40
mgariepywhen you start a vm nova will donwload the qcow2 file from glance and create a new file for the vm.20:41
spatelyes, that is true20:42
mgariepybut by default the vm file is dependent on the cached image from glance on the node.20:42
spatelyes.. that is correct20:42
spateloh wait.. no i don't think that is true20:43
spateli am running queens and up version so i don't think that is the case with me 20:44
mgariepyhttps://paste.opendev.org/show/811494/20:45
mgariepybut it depend on the configuration also.20:45
spatelits been 3 years now and i am running all local-storage and had not a single issue 20:46
mgariepyit's not what i'm saying.20:46
mgariepy:)20:46
spatel:) i thought you are saying it might be a problem when they backing up 20:47
mgariepyhttps://paste.openstack.org/show/811495/20:47
mgariepyif you have epehmeral storage like in this flavor 20:47
mgariepylive migration can cause issue.20:48
mgariepybecause of the ephemeral disk20:48
spatelThis is what my flavor saying - https://paste.openstack.org/show/811496/20:49
mgariepyok20:49
spatelwhat does Ephemeral do? 20:50
mgariepythe ephemeral disk is attached as vdb in the vm and is a separate file in the hypervisor20:50
mgariepylike : disk.eph020:50
spatelhmm just like we attached cinder disk in vm?20:50
mgariepywith a backing file (which is only a pre-formated disk image20:51
spatelwhat is the use of it?20:51
mgariepyif the options for formating the disk changes the inodes don't align when migrating.20:51
mgariepystore ephemeral data20:51
spatelwho use that?20:52
mgariepysome researcher do. to storge temporary data.20:53
spateloh so very special case 20:53
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts stable/ussuri: Always upgrade ca-certificates  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts/+/81968921:03
noonedeadpunkyou can have such mix, BUT there some tricks that needs to be done with repo server21:10
noonedeadpunkat least you need to have 1 repo server on the OS you will run on computes21:10
noonedeadpunkalso there's broken stuff with haproxy since it will point to the "master" repo server while you will have wheels for centos on the 1 specific one21:11
noonedeadpunkProbably there should be some acl rule written but I wasn't digging too deep21:11
mgariepyho that's true.21:13
mgariepyindeed.21:13
noonedeadpunkhm, where ubuntu would log oom?21:19
noonedeadpunkI just don't see any real reason for neutron-server to fail with uwsgi, except being killed.21:19
jrossergeneral syslog i think for oom21:20
noonedeadpunkoh, well, found some ovn error which says noting to me:  HashRing is empty, error: Hash Ring returned empty when hashing "b'456d1ba5-4477-447f-89c3-ef1e944cef91'"21:20
noonedeadpunkbut the thing is that in haproxy I see 200, and then it's just 504. And the last log msg in neutron-server journal is before first 504 in haproxy...21:21
noonedeadpunknothing leads to api failure...21:21
noonedeadpunkyeah. syslog is clean....21:21
noonedeadpunkhm, so what fails now with uwsgi is OVN only... (well, and calico, but that could be random)21:30
noonedeadpunkI wonder if we just can set `neutron_use_uwsgi` based on the provider picked....21:30
jrosseris neutron-server in some sort of crash loop?21:33
jrosserhrrm, well it restarts over and over again many times until here https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/7989cb6094fc4415b321603b46b2fcfa/log/logs/openstack/aio1_neutron_server_container-3f03ecf0/neutron-server.service.journal-21-14-44.log.txt#3932821:35
noonedeadpunkwell its not oom as at the end in ps I see processes21:38
noonedeadpunkwell, it might do that until we make db migrations?21:39
noonedeadpunkI wonder if now these 2 workers we have are just occupied with waiting for reply from ovn or smth like that...21:40
noonedeadpunkbut smth is specifically wrong with ovn....21:41
noonedeadpunkmgariepy: logs have been posted for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/486156 :p21:42
noonedeadpunkand you had some hands on with OVN?21:43
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron master: Implement uWSGI for neutron-api  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_neutron/+/48615621:46
mgariepyi can take a look tomorrow21:46
jrosserinterestingly neutron server is the only thing with data stillin recv-q here https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/9ac242757c00471aafa97ffcfd43968a/log/logs/openstack/instance-info/ss_20-43-19.log.txt21:46
noonedeadpunkhm, yes21:49
jrosseroh well thats 5 requests after the haproxy backend went down maybe?21:49
noonedeadpunkI'd say there should be 6 requests but yeah, you're probably right it's haproxy21:50
noonedeadpunkah, yes, it's 5, sixth is 504 ie incoming request for neutron I guess21:51
noonedeadpunkso it's not killed, just doesn't respond....21:52
noonedeadpunkand neutron doesn't care to gather enough logs for uwsgi test....21:54
noonedeadpunkbut they seem to use apache for some reason....21:55
noonedeadpunkworth probably talking to them in the morning....21:56
noonedeadpunkI bet they also test like ovs....21:56
opendevreviewDmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/ussuri: Bump OpenStack-Ansible Ussuri  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible/+/82060422:16
opendevreviewMerged openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila master: Refactor galera_use_ssl behaviour  https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_manila/+/81023723:29

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!