| *** ashak has joined #openstack-ansible | 00:15 | |
| *** woodard has joined #openstack-ansible | 00:16 | |
| *** esberglu has quit IRC | 00:37 | |
| *** chyka_ has quit IRC | 00:38 | |
| *** TxGirlGeek has quit IRC | 01:01 | |
| *** TxGirlGeek has joined #openstack-ansible | 01:11 | |
| *** TxGirlGeek has quit IRC | 01:12 | |
| *** pbandark has quit IRC | 01:17 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-ansible | 01:17 | |
| *** ashak has quit IRC | 01:20 | |
| *** ashak has joined #openstack-ansible | 01:21 | |
| *** pradiprwt has quit IRC | 01:22 | |
| *** woodard_ has joined #openstack-ansible | 01:36 | |
| *** woodard has quit IRC | 01:36 | |
| *** savvas` has joined #openstack-ansible | 02:25 | |
| *** savvas` has quit IRC | 02:27 | |
| *** savvas` has joined #openstack-ansible | 02:28 | |
| *** armaan has quit IRC | 02:33 | |
| yifei | Hi all. I have question that when play "lxc_container_config.yml", if any container creation failed, the tasks after flush_handlers will not be run. Then the rest configuration tasks for all of the containers would not be run either. | 02:33 |
|---|---|---|
| yifei | any one know about this? | 02:34 |
| yifei | ashak: I have met the same problem. It seems that it has been fixed in the lastest stable/pike | 02:37 |
| yifei | ashak: but after deployment, my galera will be crush and cannot be started after running sometime. I have had a lot problems while deploying pike on centos. Made me crazy..... | 02:41 |
| *** udesale has joined #openstack-ansible | 02:46 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 03:06 | |
| *** adreznec has quit IRC | 03:07 | |
| *** adreznec has joined #openstack-ansible | 03:08 | |
| *** adreznec has quit IRC | 03:16 | |
| *** adreznec has joined #openstack-ansible | 03:21 | |
| *** ANKITA has quit IRC | 03:28 | |
| masber | good afternoon all, shall I run the playbooks as root in order to install openstack through OSA? | 03:44 |
| masber | the reason I am asking is because OSA recommends ubuntu for installation but root user can't ssh by default so I am not sure whether I should enable ssh for root user on all hosts and run ansible as root or just change the permissions for /etc/openstack-ansible folder? | 03:46 |
| *** savvas` has quit IRC | 03:58 | |
| *** gfa has quit IRC | 03:59 | |
| *** esberglu has joined #openstack-ansible | 04:16 | |
| *** esberglu has quit IRC | 04:17 | |
| *** nshetty has joined #openstack-ansible | 04:26 | |
| *** chhavi has joined #openstack-ansible | 04:37 | |
| *** pmannidi has quit IRC | 04:44 | |
| *** mpranjic has joined #openstack-ansible | 04:46 | |
| *** hybridpollo has quit IRC | 04:54 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-ansible | 04:56 | |
| *** bhujay has joined #openstack-ansible | 04:58 | |
| masber | hi, I am getting this error while running "sudo openstack-ansible -vvv setup-hosts.yml" --> https://bpaste.net/show/9eb98e0f18d0 | 05:01 |
| masber | it looks like br-mgmt does not exist? | 05:05 |
| *** poopcat1 has quit IRC | 05:09 | |
| *** nshetty has quit IRC | 05:44 | |
| *** nshetty has joined #openstack-ansible | 05:45 | |
| *** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible | 05:53 | |
| *** smatzek has quit IRC | 05:57 | |
| masber | ok, I think I have to create the bridges myself | 05:59 |
| *** pmannidi has joined #openstack-ansible | 06:18 | |
| *** ANKITA has joined #openstack-ansible | 06:35 | |
| *** taseer1 is now known as Taseer | 06:37 | |
| *** gkadam has quit IRC | 06:43 | |
| *** taseer1 has joined #openstack-ansible | 06:44 | |
| *** taseer2 has joined #openstack-ansible | 06:44 | |
| *** Taseer has quit IRC | 06:45 | |
| *** taseer3 has joined #openstack-ansible | 06:48 | |
| *** taseer2 has quit IRC | 06:48 | |
| *** taseer4 has joined #openstack-ansible | 06:48 | |
| *** taseer1 has quit IRC | 06:48 | |
| *** taseer3 has quit IRC | 06:53 | |
| *** pcaruana has joined #openstack-ansible | 06:56 | |
| *** armaan has joined #openstack-ansible | 07:10 | |
| *** SmearedBeard has joined #openstack-ansible | 07:25 | |
| evrardjp | cores, could we wait before introducing new features? We have so many bugs to fix now, I'd rather we fix/stabilize things this week. | 07:27 |
| evrardjp | before merging* new features | 07:27 |
| evrardjp | masber: you have to create bridges yourself. It's written in our deploy guide documentation | 07:31 |
| ThomasSch_ | hi | 07:32 |
| evrardjp | hello ThomasSch_ | 07:33 |
| ThomasSch_ | i wanted to enable ceph for backup and followed the guide | 07:33 |
| ThomasSch_ | i get an error in retrieving ceph keyring for openstack clients | 07:33 |
| ThomasSch_ | the cinder backup is working fine | 07:33 |
| evrardjp | did you deploy ceph with osa, or you have a standalone ceph cluster? | 07:33 |
| ThomasSch_ | is this known? | 07:33 |
| ThomasSch_ | yes | 07:33 |
| ThomasSch_ | followed the ceph guide | 07:33 |
| *** pmannidi has quit IRC | 07:34 | |
| evrardjp | Which guide? | 07:34 |
| evrardjp | :) | 07:34 |
| ThomasSch_ | https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/openstack-ansible/pike/app-config-prod-ceph.html | 07:34 |
| evrardjp | ok | 07:34 |
| ThomasSch_ | was getting the link :-) | 07:34 |
| evrardjp | your yes was good in its logic, it just didn't help me :p | 07:35 |
| evrardjp | you're following the right docs | 07:35 |
| ThomasSch_ | yes sorry :-) | 07:35 |
| ThomasSch_ | so ceph with osa | 07:36 |
| evrardjp | no it's my fault, ambiguous quesiton! | 07:36 |
| evrardjp | so you mean cinder backup is working, but not with a ceph backend? | 07:36 |
| ThomasSch_ | no cinder backup is not working but the normal backend | 07:36 |
| ThomasSch_ | Retrieve keyrings for openstack clients from ceph cluster] | 07:36 |
| ThomasSch_ | fatal: [infra1]: FAILED! => {"failed": true, "msg": "'ceph_mon_host' is undefined"} | 07:37 |
| ThomasSch_ | i was running os-cinder playbook with tag cinder-config | 07:37 |
| evrardjp | ceph_mon_host must be defined | 07:37 |
| evrardjp | if you followed the docs | 07:37 |
| evrardjp | in the docs it's in /etc/openstack_deploy/openstack_user_config.yml | 07:37 |
| evrardjp | but you could define it in conf.d/ too | 07:38 |
| evrardjp | ThomasSch_: you should run without the tags at first | 07:38 |
| ThomasSch_ | it is defined | 07:38 |
| ThomasSch_ | ceph-mon_hosts: *infrastructure_host | 07:38 |
| ThomasSch_ | ok | 07:38 |
| ThomasSch_ | i will give it a try | 07:39 |
| *** SmearedBeard has quit IRC | 07:41 | |
| evrardjp | mmm | 07:45 |
| evrardjp | *infrastructure_hosts ? | 07:46 |
| *** udesale has quit IRC | 07:46 | |
| evrardjp | and do you have _infrastructure_hosts: &infrastructure_hosts ? | 07:46 |
| evrardjp | maybe better if you share your openstack_user_config | 07:47 |
| *** epalper has joined #openstack-ansible | 07:49 | |
| ThomasSch_ | one second | 07:54 |
| ThomasSch_ | os cinde rinstall worked without any error | 07:55 |
| ThomasSch_ | still only 4 pools in ceph | 07:55 |
| ThomasSch_ | no backup pool | 07:55 |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/monitorstack master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532049 | 07:56 |
| ThomasSch_ | here is the config | 07:56 |
| ThomasSch_ | https://pastebin.com/mZzuP6U8 | 07:56 |
| *** mbuil has joined #openstack-ansible | 07:57 | |
| *** gkadam has joined #openstack-ansible | 08:13 | |
| *** pradiprwt has joined #openstack-ansible | 08:22 | |
| *** SmearedBeard has joined #openstack-ansible | 08:29 | |
| openstackgerrit | Jean-Philippe Evrard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone master: Fix undefined handler Manage LB https://review.openstack.org/532069 | 08:29 |
| *** chhavi__ has joined #openstack-ansible | 08:29 | |
| jafeha__ | good morning | 08:29 |
| *** chhavi has quit IRC | 08:29 | |
| *** jafeha__ is now known as jafeha | 08:29 | |
| evrardjp | ThomasSch_: are they supposed to be different pools? I don't know | 08:30 |
| evrardjp | jafeha: good morning | 08:30 |
| jafeha | good morning evrardjp | 08:30 |
| evrardjp | ThomasSch_: maybe we have to add verification checks in our docs | 08:30 |
| evrardjp | let's wait for logan- or andymccr , they worked on ceph, so they know what to expect | 08:31 |
| evrardjp | jafeha: I have to finish up another bug that prevented me fixing the first bug, then I am all scenarios! | 08:32 |
| jafeha | :D | 08:32 |
| jafeha | i only having half an eye, but whats wrong with ceph? | 08:32 |
| evrardjp | (Unless someone merges something that breaks further things, which usually happens to me, thanks to my luck) | 08:32 |
| evrardjp | jafeha: are there supposed to be two different pools for cinder and cinder backups? | 08:32 |
| jafeha | afair yes | 08:33 |
| jafeha | we have separate pools at least | 08:33 |
| evrardjp | ThomasSch_: you got your answer there :) | 08:33 |
| jafeha | never tested that functionality though | 08:33 |
| andymccr | ThomasSch_: in general check out https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible docs - it will have docs on how to setup pools etc. | 08:33 |
| evrardjp | andymccr: thanks! | 08:33 |
| andymccr | OSA literally just implements that, so none of the ceph bits are really special, aside from some glue bits | 08:33 |
| *** SmearedBeard has quit IRC | 08:34 | |
| jafeha | andymccr, talking about ceph, do you know if there are any plans for implementing rados as opt in as swift backend? | 08:34 |
| andymccr | jafeha: there are! let me find the PR | 08:35 |
| andymccr | i'm hoping to talk to logan- about it at the PTG and get that finalised | 08:35 |
| andymccr | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/517856/ | 08:35 |
| jafeha | wohoo :D | 08:35 |
| andymccr | he's most of the way there already, but it just needs a bit of TLC and we can get that going | 08:35 |
| jafeha | that makes my mood even better today :D | 08:35 |
| jrosser | andymccr: nice to see that radosgw stuff in progress - whats still to do? | 08:39 |
| evrardjp | andymccr: how does this work? | 08:41 |
| evrardjp | does the radosgw speak a swift compatible api? | 08:42 |
| evrardjp | or is there some kind of middleware wiring to do between swift and the radosgw? | 08:42 |
| *** wspthr has quit IRC | 08:47 | |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-apt_package_pinning master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532082 | 08:47 |
| andymccr | evrardjp: yeah radosgw does swift and s3 apis | 08:49 |
| andymccr | but it just requires integration with keystone etc. | 08:49 |
| andymccr | jrosser: honestly not too much, ive manually set it up a few times, and it basically does what logan- already has setup, so i think it really just needs a bit of a look over. i've got that on my to-do list. the actual setup is pretty simple though. | 08:50 |
| andymccr | evrardjp: so you just create the swift endpoint but point it to the radosgw vip endpoint. and then it works, obviously swift middleware and other stuff that is swift specific wont work ever | 08:51 |
| *** gameon has joined #openstack-ansible | 08:51 | |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-ceph_client master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532086 | 08:51 |
| jrosser | andymccr: thats great - have you ever needed/wanted a seperate LB for radosgw to scale it independantly of all the API endpoints? | 08:53 |
| andymccr | jrosser: personally ive not set that up, but i think it would be reasonably ok to setup with how it is now | 08:54 |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_client master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532088 | 08:56 |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-galera_server master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532091 | 08:59 |
| *** SmearedBeard has joined #openstack-ansible | 09:00 | |
| ashak | yifei: thanks for sharing that. Hopefully that means it's not me doing something totally crazy | 09:01 |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-haproxy_server master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532094 | 09:03 |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_container_create master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532096 | 09:04 |
| jafeha | andymccr, jrosser evrardjp we had set the radosgw as our swift endpoint, but i never got the glue for keystone working. i'm glad this goes ahead though. | 09:13 |
| jafeha | i'm not sure about the integration within ceph-ansible, but i think for serving one endpoint we'd need to deploy haproxy on those ceph nodes. | 09:14 |
| *** sxc731 has joined #openstack-ansible | 09:15 | |
| jrosser | jafeha: it's notes as a todo here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/517856/ see the comment in patch set 6 | 09:15 |
| jafeha | jrosser, thanks :D | 09:17 |
| andymccr | ^ should work. ive done it manually a few times | 09:17 |
| andymccr | to integrate OSA with a separate ceph-ansible deploy at least | 09:17 |
| jafeha | thats the easy way to go, i had built it with a separate haproxy deployment on the storage nodes because our infra hosts are painfully slow / low bandwidth | 09:19 |
| *** bhujay has quit IRC | 09:21 | |
| *** SmearedBeard has quit IRC | 09:21 | |
| *** bhujay has joined #openstack-ansible | 09:27 | |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532122 | 09:28 |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-memcached_server master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532125 | 09:31 |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_hosts master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532127 | 09:35 |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-openstack_openrc master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532129 | 09:39 |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-ops master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532130 | 09:41 |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_almanach master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532131 | 09:45 |
| *** armaan has quit IRC | 09:46 | |
| *** armaan has joined #openstack-ansible | 09:47 | |
| *** chhavi__ has quit IRC | 09:48 | |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_aodh master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532133 | 09:48 |
| *** chhavi__ has joined #openstack-ansible | 09:49 | |
| openstackgerrit | Gaudenz Steinlin proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Stable keepalived priorities https://review.openstack.org/532135 | 09:52 |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_barbican master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532137 | 09:53 |
| *** mardim has quit IRC | 09:54 | |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ceilometer master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532139 | 09:57 |
| *** udesale has joined #openstack-ansible | 09:59 | |
| *** mardim has joined #openstack-ansible | 10:01 | |
| *** pbandark has joined #openstack-ansible | 10:01 | |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cinder master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532140 | 10:01 |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_cloudkitty master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532143 | 10:05 |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_designate master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532144 | 10:07 |
| *** wspthr has joined #openstack-ansible | 10:07 | |
| *** armaan has quit IRC | 10:07 | |
| *** armaan has joined #openstack-ansible | 10:07 | |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_glance master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532145 | 10:10 |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_gnocchi master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532148 | 10:15 |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_heat master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532150 | 10:19 |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_horizon master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532151 | 10:23 |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_ironic master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532152 | 10:26 |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532153 | 10:29 |
| *** mpranjic has quit IRC | 10:31 | |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_magnum master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532154 | 10:32 |
| *** taseer4 is now known as Taseer | 10:33 | |
| openstackgerrit | Gaudenz Steinlin proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Stable keepalived priorities https://review.openstack.org/532135 | 10:35 |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_molteniron master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532155 | 10:36 |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_monasca-agent master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532156 | 10:41 |
| openstackgerrit | lei zhang proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_monasca-ui master: Fix the incorrect git.openstack.org source URL https://review.openstack.org/532157 | 10:43 |
| evrardjp | cloudnull mhayden andymccr odyssey4me mgariepy hwoarang spotz Could you please not merge new features into master this week, until the most critical bugs are resolved? Thank you! | 10:44 |
| hwoarang | evrardjp: sure thing. Do you have a list for us during the meeting? | 10:46 |
| evrardjp | hwoarang: yes, we'll go through them, and I will discuss the context during the meeting too. | 10:46 |
| evrardjp | Thanks for your regular presence, it's a pleasure to see you there :) | 10:47 |
| evrardjp | I am not sure everyone realizes how much I like to see people attending the meetings, and be active :D | 10:48 |
| hwoarang | ah good. Looking forward to the meeting then | 10:48 |
| hwoarang | would be nice for gerrit to provide a way to block new checkins though :) | 10:49 |
| hwoarang | feature request! | 10:49 |
| *** chyka has joined #openstack-ansible | 10:51 | |
| *** chyka has quit IRC | 10:55 | |
| evrardjp | I am fine with people adding new features and testing them, as long as they are not +W | 10:56 |
| *** chhavi__ has quit IRC | 10:57 | |
| *** tacco has joined #openstack-ansible | 11:03 | |
| *** stuartgr has joined #openstack-ansible | 11:15 | |
| *** udesale has quit IRC | 11:24 | |
| *** pbandark1 has joined #openstack-ansible | 11:34 | |
| jafeha | hey everybody. i'm currently debugging some issues relating the unbound configuration. there seem to be two different regional zones to being set. the unbound role sets the unbound_regional_zone (defaults to RegionOne.openstack) and the openstack_domain (defaults to openstack.local) from the osa main repository. can anyone explain me the difference of those two? | 11:35 |
| *** pbandark has quit IRC | 11:35 | |
| *** pbandark1 is now known as pbandark | 11:35 | |
| *** udesale has joined #openstack-ansible | 11:36 | |
| jafeha | and also: the unbound client role seems not to set any search domain, which breaks fqdn resoution for my compute nodes. | 11:37 |
| *** udesale has quit IRC | 11:39 | |
| *** udesale has joined #openstack-ansible | 11:39 | |
| odyssey4me | jafeha we may need to consult with logan- on that, but it sounds like there's an extra bit of default wiring we might need to do there | 11:40 |
| odyssey4me | evrardjp I'd suggest using an administrative -2 on any patches you see are doing so. I, personally, am not going to have time for new features anyway in the next week or two. | 11:41 |
| jafeha | odyssey4me, seems to me like we're having some issues with our metal, not the containers. | 11:41 |
| jafeha | the vars could imho be consolidated though. | 11:42 |
| odyssey4me | jafeha perhaps, if they're intended to be the same by default - but logan- would need to confirm as he's the developer of the unbound 'feature' | 11:42 |
| jafeha | sure, i might miss something here | 11:43 |
| odyssey4me | the openstack_domain is meat as the default domain for instances, whereas the unbound domain is for the back-end IIRC | 11:43 |
| odyssey4me | *meant | 11:43 |
| jafeha | odyssey4me, thats what i thought before, but then the vars and their settings keep confusing me: openstack_domain: openstack.local and lxc_container_domain: "{{ openstack_domain }}" and unbound_regional_zone: "{{ service_region }}.{{ unbound_root_zone }}" | 11:47 |
| odyssey4me | jafeha yep, which is why I think logan- needs to provide insight | 11:48 |
| jafeha | but i'll consult with logan- mbe he can light things up for me | 11:48 |
| evrardjp | odyssey4me: you're good then :) I am trying communication, see how it goes. | 11:48 |
| *** SmearedBeard has joined #openstack-ansible | 11:50 | |
| bhujay | odyssey4me: Trying hard to integrate horizon with cloudkitty , I followed gokhan's stable/pike role https://github.com/b3lab/openstack-ansible-os_cloudkitty/tree/stable/pike , So far the steps I have taken is including cloudkitty-dashboard git source in openstack_services.yml and running the symbolic link creation through horizon_post_install.yml . From CLI cloudkiity seems to be working fine .However , from dashboard admin cloudkitty | 11:57 |
| bhujay | service mapping is failing with the following errors https://gist.github.com/anonymous/bfa44ee54afefe929241beeea8f1c5aa , any hint ? | 11:57 |
| odyssey4me | bhujay it looks like the dashboard itself might have a bug - not sure how well it's maintained by the cloudkitty project, or if the cloudkitty project itself is well maintained | 11:58 |
| odyssey4me | it might also just be a missing bit of horizon config that's needed for cloudkitty - I don't know | 11:59 |
| odyssey4me | given that errr put it together, perhaps he can help when he comes online | 11:59 |
| evrardjp | bhujay: probably worth asking huats | 11:59 |
| evrardjp | iirc | 11:59 |
| bhujay | evrardjp:Yes I was there in cloudkitty iirc , given the error , actually asking for a correct SHA that I can include in openstack_service.yml | 12:01 |
| bhujay | odyssey4me:As always sir , your hint is helpful . I will at least plan few experiments with some older commits | 12:03 |
| odyssey4me | bhujay not sure if older will help, horizon's changed quite a bit and I'm not sure if the cloudkitty dashboard has caught up to those changes | 12:03 |
| odyssey4me | but sure, I'd be looking at the differences - the last cloudkitty dashboard commit vs major changes in horizon and cloudkitty | 12:04 |
| bhujay | odyssey4me and evrardjp , just wanted to update that my month long effort on gnocchi and aodh finally given result . Was able to test sucessfully heat autoscalling , it worked like a charm ! now the last is billing part and I am planning to test open for my organization | 12:09 |
| evrardjp | bhujay: wow, that's great to hear. We need to make this work in a scenario | 12:10 |
| bhujay | sure , need to learn heat more . For that I have formed a small team who will focus on different use cases for our current applications | 12:11 |
| odyssey4me | bhujay awesome, any change you can share how you put it all together in some way - blog or etherpad? | 12:11 |
| odyssey4me | or gist | 12:11 |
| odyssey4me | *chance | 12:11 |
| odyssey4me | evrardjp happy to approve https://review.openstack.org/529424 ? | 12:12 |
| evrardjp | odyssey4me: why not, I trust you. | 12:12 |
| evrardjp | :D | 12:12 |
| evrardjp | future will tell me if I should have or not :p | 12:13 |
| odyssey4me | evrardjp also, does your -2 still stand here? it seems old: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/510551/ | 12:13 |
| evrardjp | removed. | 12:13 |
| odyssey4me | thx | 12:13 |
| jafeha | evrardjp, talking about scenarios, i'm currently giving my ovs aio tests another run, do your patching, i'll get back to you as soon as i've completed a successful run | 12:15 |
| *** eumel8 has joined #openstack-ansible | 12:16 | |
| bhujay | as of now i used only the learning template provided by heat , heat irc was great help . There aodh listener listenes for a gnocchi cpu utilization threshold and once reached aodh notifier triggers an autoscale group . This worked so smooth that I am confident we will apply it for our real applications soon and update you | 12:16 |
| bhujay | jafeha: is it ovs bridge ? does it mean we will have option to choose linuxbridge or ovs for osa deployment ? I was browsing if there is osa integration possible for opendaylight but understood it depneds on ovs , it will be great if osa covers these stuffs | 12:20 |
| *** sxc731 has quit IRC | 12:20 | |
| jafeha | bhujay, osa already covers the deployment of ovs, there is also some work being done to deploy opendaylight in future releases (dunno, mbe queens). | 12:21 |
| odyssey4me | yep, queens | 12:22 |
| jafeha | i'm currently working on an ovs aio scenario for ovs, as the aio only supports linuxbridges so far | 12:22 |
| hwoarang | jafeha: that's interesting. epalper is also looking into aio+ovs. maybe you can exchange notes :) | 12:23 |
| jafeha | this scenario is also needed for gate checks as far as i understood evrardjp | 12:23 |
| jafeha | hwoarang, nice to know :D | 12:23 |
| jafeha | i'm currently testing with the queens beta, mbe i should better test it with pike to prevent running into completely unrelated issues ;) | 12:25 |
| gokhan_ | bhujay, ı didn't test cloudkitty dashboard, because we won't use it. we also developed a billing service and for it we developed a new dahboard. our billing service is not yet opensource. Our billing service benefits from cloudkitty. For your error I think there is a problem on cloudkittydasboard itself. it is not related OSA. | 12:27 |
| eumel8 | evrardjp: We have the approval for project doc translation from the TC. So we can start whenever we want ;) | 12:28 |
| evrardjp | eumel8: that is good, everything is set into place :) | 12:30 |
| evrardjp | I will work with the appropriate people | 12:31 |
| bhujay | gokhan_: thanks gokhan, I will check if it is possible to debug , billing/ sowing the price information is a important factor for my project. IS there any other alternative opensource or some low cost solutions ? | 12:31 |
| evrardjp | that would probably means AJaeger, odyssey4me, and you. | 12:31 |
| eumel8 | evrardjp: just to find out how jobs will be implemented, maybe copy things from other repos | 12:33 |
| evrardjp | exactly | 12:33 |
| gokhan_ | bhujay, I don't now. if our boss decides to make it opensource our dashboard, I will inform you. | 12:33 |
| evrardjp | we have a simpler case because we don't have (currently) the same depths of jobs | 12:33 |
| bhujay | jafeha: That was a helpful update . I got few ref now on osa ovs . thanks | 12:34 |
| eumel8 | evrardjp: problems are always in the details ;) | 12:36 |
| jafeha | bhujay, you're welcome. i'm just trying to help a little here, nothing compared to the cores | 12:37 |
| gokhan_ | hi evrardjp I wrote openstack panko(openstack event service) role and now testing it. if it passes my test, I want to share it. | 12:39 |
| evrardjp | gokhan_: a lot of precedents already exists :) Want to include it in the openstack-ansible repos and be maintainer of it, or just want to point documentation about how integration of your role should be done? | 12:45 |
| evrardjp | being in the openstack-ansible-.* repos will have the advantage of more eyes, and be part of our processes (role maturity, bot updates...) | 12:46 |
| evrardjp | but we expect you'd help us maintain it | 12:47 |
| eumel8 | how to acquire new cores... ;) | 12:49 |
| evrardjp | :D | 12:51 |
| gokhan_ | evrardjp, after testing it, I wanna include it in openstack-ansible repos. For telemetry stack it could be good. | 12:51 |
| evrardjp | eumel8: If you have additional advise there, I'm all ears! :D | 12:51 |
| evrardjp | gokhan_: I fully agree. | 12:52 |
| evrardjp | On top of that, we can make it work as a part of an autoscaling scenario, which would ensure autoscaling work as expected for you | 12:52 |
| *** savvas` has joined #openstack-ansible | 12:53 | |
| *** savvas` has joined #openstack-ansible | 12:53 | |
| epalper | jafeha: Thanks for looking into aio+ovs. I was trying to bringup aio+ovs with osa, but it failed. I thought this support is already exists in osa | 12:53 |
| epalper | jafeha: you could find the details in an email with subject "[openstack-ansible] problems with bringing up openstack in AIO flavor with OVS" | 12:55 |
| *** savvas` has quit IRC | 12:55 | |
| *** savvas` has joined #openstack-ansible | 12:55 | |
| *** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible | 12:56 | |
| epalper | jafeha: if you send me link to code patches, i could try on my setup | 12:56 |
| *** savvas` has quit IRC | 12:57 | |
| *** savvas` has joined #openstack-ansible | 12:57 | |
| jafeha | epalper, i'm having a really, really raw patchset yet, which did not deploy a single time so far. | 12:57 |
| epalper | jafeha: okay, please let me know once it's ready for testing | 12:59 |
| gokhan_ | evrardjp yep on telemetry stack we can work on autoscaling scenario. after testing panko, I will struggle to work on autoscaling scenario with telemetry services and heat. | 12:59 |
| gameon | Hello all - I have deployed Ceph on my compute nodes, in a hyperconverged fashion. My local storage on each Hypervisor is now reported at 20+TB per hypervisor, Horizon doesn't account for the fact it's shared. Is there a way to tweak this behavior? Thank you | 13:04 |
| *** udesale has quit IRC | 13:06 | |
| evrardjp | gameon: that's probably more a horizon or a nova thing, we are merely deployers. | 13:06 |
| jafeha | gameon, afair there is a long standing bug for wrongly storage calculations in horizon. so that might be even unrelated to your setup. we have a triple replica ceph cluster, which is summed to crazy amounts of storage | 13:06 |
| evrardjp | andymccr: are you there? | 13:06 |
| evrardjp | does this ring you a bell: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1741471/comments/4 ? | 13:07 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1741471 in openstack-ansible "keystone upgrade to Queens failure due to new handler" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Jean-Philippe Evrard (jean-philippe-evrard) | 13:07 |
| *** udesale has joined #openstack-ansible | 13:08 | |
| gameon | evrardjp : Indeed, I had wondered if anyone had seen it, thank you :) | 13:08 |
| gameon | jafeha: That's interesting, I will have a look into if I can solve it but it sounds like it may be something I have to live with | 13:08 |
| gameon | Thanks both evrardjp jafeha | 13:08 |
| jafeha | gameon, i saw the issue and accepted that storage calculations across multiple supported types of distributed and non-distributed storages are a hard problem to solve | 13:14 |
| *** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-ansible | 13:15 | |
| *** woodard_ has quit IRC | 13:18 | |
| *** dave-mccowan has quit IRC | 13:21 | |
| *** dave-mccowan has joined #openstack-ansible | 13:26 | |
| *** sxc731 has joined #openstack-ansible | 13:28 | |
| *** bhujay has quit IRC | 13:33 | |
| masber | evrardjp, yes, I am following the docs to create the bridges now. Why the IPs is assigned to the mgmt-bridge? | 13:34 |
| masber | evrardjp, if I follow this example https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/openstack-ansible/pike/app-config-test.html it doesn't assign IP to eth0, how is the server going to communicate to the rest of the network? | 13:35 |
| *** woodard has joined #openstack-ansible | 13:35 | |
| Bico_Fino | morning! | 13:38 |
| *** Smeared_Beard has joined #openstack-ansible | 13:47 | |
| *** esberglu has joined #openstack-ansible | 13:48 | |
| *** SmearedBeard has quit IRC | 13:48 | |
| masber | hi, I am trying to setup my first OSA installation and need some help with the networking | 13:51 |
| masber | I am following this document https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/openstack-ansible/pike/app-config-test.html | 13:52 |
| masber | and I can see that the physical interface eth0 does not have an IP, is it because it will take the IP assigned from br-mgmt? | 13:53 |
| jrosser | in that example eth0 (the physical interface) is a trunk | 13:53 |
| jrosser | you then see the vlans broken out onto eth0.10/20/30 | 13:54 |
| jrosser | see the table "Network CIDR/VLAN assignments" this is how the example assumes the connectivity to the hosts is arranged | 13:55 |
| masber | jrosser, but is this assuming that I need to setup a vlan in the physical switch? | 13:57 |
| masber | *the vlans | 13:57 |
| *** sxc731 has quit IRC | 13:58 | |
| jrosser | masber: yes that is the assumption. you are of course free to redo it however you wish, to achieve those three seperate networks | 13:58 |
| *** chhavi__ has joined #openstack-ansible | 13:58 | |
| jrosser | OSA assumes that you've got this all sorted out before starting the deploy, and picks up from br-<thing> onward | 13:59 |
| *** tacco has quit IRC | 13:59 | |
| *** tacco has joined #openstack-ansible | 14:01 | |
| masber | jrosser, ok, I don't have access to the physical switch... is there a possibility that I can do something like bridge_ports eth0 (as a flat network)? | 14:02 |
| *** shardy_afk has quit IRC | 14:17 | |
| *** afred312 has quit IRC | 14:20 | |
| *** afred312 has joined #openstack-ansible | 14:20 | |
| openstackgerrit | Jesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Fix sources-branch-updater and add docs https://review.openstack.org/529377 | 14:20 |
| *** sxc731 has joined #openstack-ansible | 14:22 | |
| *** tacco has quit IRC | 14:25 | |
| *** smatzek has quit IRC | 14:28 | |
| *** yifei1 has joined #openstack-ansible | 14:28 | |
| *** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible | 14:28 | |
| *** smatzek has quit IRC | 14:28 | |
| *** yifei1 has left #openstack-ansible | 14:30 | |
| *** tacco has joined #openstack-ansible | 14:33 | |
| evrardjp | dear cloudnull, DimGR, andymccr, d34dh0r53, hughsaunders, b3rnard0, palendae, odyssey4me, serverascode, rromans, erikmwilson, mancdaz, _shaps_, BjoernT, claco, echiu, dstanek, jwagner, ayoung, prometheanfire, evrardjp, arbrandes, mhayden, scarlisle, luckyinva, ntt, javeriak, spotz, vdo, jmccrory, alextricity25, jasondotstar, admin0, michaelgugino, ametts, v1k0d3n, severion, bgmccollum, darrenc, | 14:38 |
| evrardjp | JRobinson__, asettle, colinmcnamara, thorst, adreznec, eil397, qwang,nishpatwa_, cathrichardson, drifterza, hwoarang, cshen, ullbeking: | 14:38 |
| evrardjp | the osa bug triage will start in 1h30’. Please have a look at the bug list before starting: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/osa-bugtriage | 14:38 |
| evrardjp | 1h20, my bad. | 14:38 |
| hwoarang | time flies | 14:38 |
| mhayden | ohai | 14:39 |
| hwoarang | o/ | 14:39 |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 14:40 | |
| openstackgerrit | Major Hayden proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_hosts stable/pike: Allow NetworkManager to work (if present) https://review.openstack.org/532201 | 14:43 |
| admin0 | \o | 14:43 |
| admin0 | long time no see :) | 14:43 |
| *** jwitko_ has joined #openstack-ansible | 14:50 | |
| *** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible | 15:11 | |
| *** smatzek has quit IRC | 15:11 | |
| *** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible | 15:11 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-ansible | 15:13 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 15:16 | |
| openstackgerrit | Taseer Ahmed proposed openstack/openstack-ansible-os_congress master: Introduce os_congress role in gerrit https://review.openstack.org/522491 | 15:23 |
| *** bhujay has joined #openstack-ansible | 15:23 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-ansible | 15:25 | |
| cloudnull | mornings | 15:29 |
| spotz | hey | 15:30 |
| cloudnull | jrosser: re - multiple container store: yes that is in pike. | 15:31 |
| jrosser | cloudnull: oooh ok thats great, missed that getting backported | 15:31 |
| cloudnull | https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_container_create/blob/stable/pike/defaults/main.yml#L79-L84 | 15:32 |
| cloudnull | i'm not sure what tag that got into | 15:32 |
| cloudnull | but it is in the stable branch | 15:32 |
| evrardjp | cloudnull I am gonna do a tag soon anyway | 15:33 |
| cloudnull | woot! | 15:33 |
| evrardjp | so, we will be good | 15:33 |
| mgariepy | cloudnull, https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-lxc_container_create/commit/270743d0423846a209c0f92053d8505796c9f8f5 | 15:33 |
| mgariepy | you can see the branches in the commit. | 15:33 |
| mgariepy | :D | 15:33 |
| *** bhujay has quit IRC | 15:34 | |
| cloudnull | orly! | 15:34 |
| mgariepy | thanks to evrardjp that pointed it to me last year :) | 15:34 |
| cloudnull | that's a super handy feature | 15:34 |
| mgariepy | yep indeed. | 15:34 |
| evrardjp | yw :) | 15:35 |
| evrardjp | It's also on gerrit iirc | 15:35 |
| evrardjp | github is just very fast in my workflow | 15:36 |
| evrardjp | (see included in, on the top right in gerrit) | 15:36 |
| *** sxc731 has quit IRC | 15:37 | |
| *** sar has joined #openstack-ansible | 15:42 | |
| ashak | yifei: so I just ended up at the same place as you. My galera servers ar eno longer in the load balancer. It seems that haproxy is trying to do healthchecks on port 9200 of the galera clusters. There's nothing listening on that port on them. release notes here: https://docs.openstack.org/releasenotes/openstack-ansible/unreleased.html talk about this being a new feature in tag 17.0.0.0b2 | 15:54 |
| *** SerenaFeng has joined #openstack-ansible | 15:59 | |
| evrardjp | Bug triage cloudnull, DimGR, andymccr, d34dh0r53, hughsaunders, b3rnard0, palendae, odyssey4me, serverascode, rromans, erikmwilson, mancdaz, _shaps_, BjoernT, claco, echiu, dstanek, jwagner, ayoung, prometheanfire, evrardjp, arbrandes, mhayden, scarlisle, luckyinva, ntt, javeriak, spotz, vdo, jmccrory, alextricity25, jasondotstar, admin0, michaelgugino, ametts, v1k0d3n, severion, bgmccollum, | 15:59 |
| evrardjp | darrenc, JRobinson__, asettle, colinmcnamara, thorst, adreznec, eil397, qwang,nishpatwa_, cathrichardson, drifterza, hwoarang, cshen | 15:59 |
| evrardjp | Here is our bug list for today https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/osa-bugtriage | 15:59 |
| evrardjp | #startmeeting openstack_ansible_meeting | 15:59 |
| openstack | Meeting started Tue Jan 9 15:59:42 2018 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is evrardjp. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | 15:59 |
| openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | 15:59 |
| *** openstack changes topic to " (Meeting topic: openstack_ansible_meeting)" | 15:59 | |
| openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_ansible_meeting' | 15:59 |
| evrardjp | #topic rollcall | 15:59 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "rollcall (Meeting topic: openstack_ansible_meeting)" | 15:59 | |
| evrardjp | waiting for a couple of minutes before starting | 15:59 |
| cloudnull | o/ | 16:00 |
| d34dh0r53 | o/ | 16:00 |
| mgariepy | half-o/ | 16:00 |
| evrardjp | wow d34dh0r53 is in the place! Glad to see you :) | 16:01 |
| evrardjp | #topic new year | 16:01 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "new year (Meeting topic: openstack_ansible_meeting)" | 16:01 | |
| evrardjp | Please allow me to start the first meeting of 2018 by wishing you all an happy new year. | 16:01 |
| d34dh0r53 | :) good to be here | 16:01 |
| evrardjp | I hope you had nice winter holidays. | 16:01 |
| evrardjp | :) | 16:01 |
| d34dh0r53 | Likewise | 16:01 |
| evrardjp | #topic this week's focus introduction | 16:02 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "this week's focus introduction (Meeting topic: openstack_ansible_meeting)" | 16:02 | |
| prometheanfire | hi | 16:02 |
| evrardjp | A new topic/section on our weekly meeting! | 16:02 |
| evrardjp | A little backstory first. | 16:02 |
| evrardjp | We faced a few challenges at the beginning of this cycle. | 16:02 |
| evrardjp | While these challenges came mostly from external factors, I think we sometimes failed to work together in their resolution. | 16:02 |
| evrardjp | After analysis, I've noticed that it mostly came from different people working on different things, and then those different things would land together, making it harder to fix compared to a more coordinated approach. | 16:02 |
| *** sxc731 has joined #openstack-ansible | 16:03 | |
| evrardjp | After discussing with a few of you, I realized reducing the amount of community meetings also reduced our communication abilities, which led to less coordination. | 16:03 |
| evrardjp | I think we should therefore have a "week's focus". | 16:03 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Stable keepalived priorities https://review.openstack.org/532135 | 16:03 |
| evrardjp | This "focus" thing will allow us to be in sync with what we do together, avoid misunderstandings. | 16:03 |
| evrardjp | At each community meeting (currently happening at the last Tuesday of the month), I'll propose next month focuses, and we'll adapt the planning together. | 16:03 |
| evrardjp | What's your opininon? Is there anyone opposed to this idea? | 16:03 |
| spotz | \o/ I'm late catching up | 16:04 |
| spotz | If we're having focuses we also need to allow for emergencies | 16:05 |
| evrardjp | yeah I think we need ofc space for modifications of the planning | 16:05 |
| evrardjp | but they should be relatively minimum, and only about fixing something we should triage as critical | 16:06 |
| evrardjp | (which means blocking people because of broken gates) | 16:06 |
| spotz | Well a bug could be critical as well. Maybe a list of what constitutes critical | 16:07 |
| evrardjp | that's what I meant | 16:07 |
| evrardjp | modifications of the planning should be minimal, the modification should only happen in case of a critical bug appearing. | 16:08 |
| evrardjp | also I think this should be a FOCUS not a hinderance | 16:08 |
| evrardjp | people should still be able to do their usual work, but remember what the focus is | 16:09 |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 16:09 | |
| evrardjp | to avoid stepping on each other toes | 16:09 |
| odyssey4me | o/ not sure how this would play out - could you give an example of what a focus would be, and what that would mean in real terms? | 16:10 |
| openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstack-ansible master: Avoid retrieving IP from a missing bridge https://review.openstack.org/524738 | 16:11 |
| evrardjp | odyssey4me: I thought of different focuses, depending on where we are in the cycle | 16:11 |
| evrardjp | handling deprecations would be one | 16:11 |
| evrardjp | so if during that week's focus we are cleaning the old things, we know the next week we could have things linked to the removal appearing. | 16:12 |
| openstackgerrit | Gaudenz Steinlin proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/pike: Stable keepalived priorities https://review.openstack.org/532230 | 16:13 |
| evrardjp | for this week I thought the focus could be on fixing the upgrade from P-Q. let me explain that: | 16:13 |
| odyssey4me | ok, that works for short term things - but what about long term things like implementing the nspawn usage or changing up the inventory or changing up how the software installs are done | 16:13 |
| evrardjp | This could still integrate. | 16:13 |
| evrardjp | A cycle is 6 months | 16:14 |
| evrardjp | if we plan the focus month per month, it would allow us to have a big picture and a more organized planning, together, of what happens in the cycle | 16:14 |
| odyssey4me | well, I'd suggest that you give your suggestion a try - but bear in mind that some things are long term an dwon't fit well with that... what you're suggesting sounds like a good thing for people who are looking to help, but don't know where to start | 16:15 |
| evrardjp | We have a lot of challenges for the last part of the Queens cycle. I know we have many new features to introduce, | 16:15 |
| evrardjp | but I'd like to first fix the , in order to be able to upgrade from P-Q, whether they are roles or the AIO. | 16:15 |
| evrardjp | If we don't merge new things like nspawn this week, it would help on getting there | 16:15 |
| odyssey4me | having a sort-of breakdown for the cycle where there is some sort of focus for a period for the general community to chip in is a great idea IMO | 16:16 |
| evrardjp | thanks for your support | 16:16 |
| odyssey4me | that allows bugs to be arranged into the schedule too, which might be a nice way of smashing more of them | 16:16 |
| evrardjp | Like I said it should be a focus, not a hinderance. So people should still be able to do their work | 16:16 |
| openstackgerrit | Gaudenz Steinlin proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/ocata: Stable keepalived priorities https://review.openstack.org/532232 | 16:17 |
| evrardjp | they should just remember that if there is a bug smash for example, introducing a large feature would be counter productive | 16:17 |
| evrardjp | or at the opposite, if there is a large feature that we expect to require a bug smash, we can have the "focus" done that way | 16:17 |
| evrardjp | anyone other opinion? | 16:18 |
| evrardjp | if not let's move to try it, and see how it goes, start the bug triage for today. | 16:18 |
| evrardjp | #topic this week's bugs. | 16:19 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "this week's bugs. (Meeting topic: openstack_ansible_meeting)" | 16:19 | |
| evrardjp | we have some nasty bugs this week, and a whole series of bugs too. | 16:19 |
| *** RandomTech has joined #openstack-ansible | 16:19 | |
| evrardjp | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1741990 | 16:20 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1741990 in openstack-ansible "os_cinder Associating QoS types to volume types fails" [Undecided,New] | 16:20 |
| *** udesale has quit IRC | 16:20 | |
| RandomTech | Is it normal for the rabbgitMQ check to fail the first time you run setup-infrastructure but work the second time? | 16:20 |
| odyssey4me | my might want to switch to using storyboard - not sure exactly how it works, but my impression is that was designed with this work method in mind | 16:20 |
| evrardjp | odyssey4me: interesting. I will have a look at that. | 16:21 |
| odyssey4me | awesome | 16:22 |
| spotz | odyssey4me: We've played with storybooard a little during Upstream Institute, it's definitely good for grouping like topics and smaller pieces of an issue. It does take some getting used to | 16:22 |
| evrardjp | the whole point of this previous topic was to get attention on the collaborative part. I think it would be helpful to avoid clashes. | 16:22 |
| openstackgerrit | Gaudenz Steinlin proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/newton: Stable keepalived priorities https://review.openstack.org/532233 | 16:23 |
| odyssey4me | yeah, it may help reduce the amount of unplanned work coming into play | 16:23 |
| evrardjp | to get back to the bug triage now, I think that this issue looks valid | 16:23 |
| evrardjp | what about marking it as confirmed and high? | 16:23 |
| *** SerenaFeng has quit IRC | 16:24 | |
| evrardjp | ok I will continue the bug triage road. | 16:25 |
| cloudnull | on the road again | 16:25 |
| evrardjp | haha | 16:25 |
| evrardjp | that's a good song, and a good radio broadcast. | 16:25 |
| evrardjp | cloudnull: do you happen to agree on the bug classification? | 16:25 |
| cloudnull | for keepalived ? | 16:26 |
| cloudnull | 532233 | 16:26 |
| evrardjp | for https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1741990 | 16:26 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1741990 in openstack-ansible "os_cinder Associating QoS types to volume types fails" [Undecided,New] | 16:26 |
| cloudnull | hahaha . | 16:26 |
| evrardjp | confirmed? high? | 16:26 |
| * cloudnull looking at the wrong link :) | 16:26 | |
| odyssey4me | yeah, looks valid | 16:26 |
| odyssey4me | agreed | 16:26 |
| evrardjp | ok thanks. | 16:27 |
| *** pbandark1 has joined #openstack-ansible | 16:27 | |
| cloudnull | ++ | 16:27 |
| evrardjp | next one is fun | 16:27 |
| *** pbandark has quit IRC | 16:27 | |
| *** pbandark1 is now known as pbandark | 16:27 | |
| evrardjp | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1741634 | 16:27 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1741634 in openstack-ansible "virtualenv-tools is unreliable for changing path in venvs" [Critical,New] - Assigned to Jean-Philippe Evrard (jean-philippe-evrard) | 16:27 |
| cloudnull | i might set that to high | 16:27 |
| evrardjp | cloudnull: we agree then :) | 16:27 |
| odyssey4me | valid, high/confirmed | 16:27 |
| evrardjp | for https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1741634 I think we should mark it as critical | 16:27 |
| odyssey4me | actually, yeah - critical makes sense | 16:28 |
| evrardjp | because it will break gates and expectations | 16:28 |
| evrardjp | question | 16:28 |
| cloudnull | is it failing for us these days | 16:28 |
| cloudnull | or is that just due to the project being unmaintaine d? | 16:28 |
| evrardjp | the project is unmaintained | 16:28 |
| evrardjp | and won't accept a simple change to change the shebang | 16:28 |
| evrardjp | so we are kinda stuck | 16:29 |
| evrardjp | so that was my question | 16:29 |
| evrardjp | vendor in, or use another thing | 16:29 |
| cloudnull | can we just fork and fix | 16:29 |
| cloudnull | and then look for an alternitive later? | 16:29 |
| evrardjp | I've checked what it would need to do for an alternative | 16:29 |
| evrardjp | that's very simple | 16:29 |
| * hwoarang was dragged to some internal talks and is catching up now | 16:29 | |
| evrardjp | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/531731/ | 16:29 |
| evrardjp | was just wondering if you agreed on the approach, because we're gonna have to backport that back down. | 16:30 |
| evrardjp | very low. | 16:30 |
| evrardjp | I guess we can discuss in the review now | 16:30 |
| evrardjp | let's move to next bug | 16:30 |
| cloudnull | I'd probably fork and fix the unmaintained project | 16:30 |
| cloudnull | then spec out an actual replacement | 16:31 |
| evrardjp | ok that's really possible too. | 16:31 |
| odyssey4me | cloudnull could, but then how do we publish the updated version to pypi? | 16:31 |
| evrardjp | It would be quite easy and less risky | 16:31 |
| evrardjp | someone could take the responsibility for it I guess | 16:31 |
| cloudnull | odyssey4me: yes. if the maintainer is not wanting to deal with it we cloud take it over on pypi if they're willing | 16:31 |
| evrardjp | odyssey4me: the fork approach is less risky but logistically more complex | 16:31 |
| hwoarang | sed is simple enough imho | 16:32 |
| odyssey4me | the tool doesn't seem to do much else IIRC | 16:32 |
| evrardjp | yeah I think sed _should_ cover us enough. | 16:32 |
| evrardjp | but that's the thing, it's only a _should_ , according to what I have seen. | 16:32 |
| cloudnull | if it works +1 | 16:33 |
| evrardjp | ok | 16:33 |
| evrardjp | let's discuss next bug then | 16:33 |
| evrardjp | it blocks this patch :p | 16:33 |
| evrardjp | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1741471 | 16:33 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1741471 in openstack-ansible "keystone upgrade to Queens failure due to new handler" [Undecided,New] - Assigned to Jean-Philippe Evrard (jean-philippe-evrard) | 16:33 |
| evrardjp | this one is fun too, and is not our fault. | 16:33 |
| evrardjp | Right now I don't know how to fix it, and I will dig deeper (except if someone knows how to fix this) | 16:35 |
| odyssey4me | maybe logan- can help with that as he worked on the LB thingy | 16:35 |
| logan- | o/ | 16:36 |
| evrardjp | the alternative would be to install ansible==2.3 just before running the os_previous_* role, and then do the upgrade after an update of ansible. | 16:36 |
| logan- | issue there is upgrades right? | 16:36 |
| evrardjp | odyssey4me: it's a pure ansible failure | 16:36 |
| evrardjp | but yeah :) | 16:36 |
| odyssey4me | ah yes, this is actually an issue with the way our role tests upgrades | 16:36 |
| evrardjp | logan-: yes | 16:36 |
| evrardjp | logan-: odyssey4me have a look at my last comment | 16:36 |
| odyssey4me | we use the newer ansible to test the older role code | 16:36 |
| evrardjp | yes | 16:36 |
| logan- | https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_keystone/blob/a48a73089286a370312a35fc7df54a6a3a513fa2/handlers/main.yml#L107-L109 | 16:37 |
| evrardjp | we could technically change the older role by adding {{ role_dir }} iirc | 16:37 |
| logan- | could we just drop that in the previous branch | 16:37 |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-ansible | 16:37 | |
| odyssey4me | so yes, we should either change how the upgrade test runs in the roles - or work out a workaround | 16:37 |
| evrardjp | logan-: that sounds a bad idea | 16:37 |
| odyssey4me | logan- dropping it in the older branch creates turtles | 16:37 |
| evrardjp | we could define that handler in the playbook without needing that | 16:37 |
| odyssey4me | drop into pike, breaks the pike upgrade test - drop into ocata doesn't support the listen thing in the handler | 16:38 |
| evrardjp | but that's just the start of all our failures | 16:38 |
| evrardjp | we are NOT testing pike in reality. | 16:38 |
| logan- | gotcha odyssey4me | 16:38 |
| evrardjp | odyssey4me: in this case that would stop at Pike, but yes, it could technically. | 16:38 |
| evrardjp | (ansible 2.3 and 2.2 having the same behavior) | 16:38 |
| odyssey4me | best longer term strategy is to make the upgrade test use the right ansible for the initial deploy... but then it also needs to implement the older roles for everything... so the whole upgrade jobs needs to change quite dramatically | 16:39 |
| evrardjp | my concern is that we aren't testing pike to queens | 16:39 |
| openstackgerrit | Gaudenz Steinlin proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/pike: Avoid retrieving IP from a missing bridge https://review.openstack.org/532243 | 16:39 |
| evrardjp | odyssey4me: yeah that's my concern. | 16:39 |
| openstackgerrit | Gaudenz Steinlin proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/ocata: Avoid retrieving IP from a missing bridge https://review.openstack.org/532244 | 16:39 |
| evrardjp | that's too big of a change. | 16:39 |
| odyssey4me | it might be better to just make the role tests use the integrated build, but with a more limited inventory | 16:39 |
| openstackgerrit | Gaudenz Steinlin proposed openstack/openstack-ansible stable/newton: Avoid retrieving IP from a missing bridge https://review.openstack.org/532245 | 16:39 |
| odyssey4me | again, that's a significant body of work | 16:40 |
| evrardjp | I thought the change of ansible version just before and after sounded better, but I don't think it's a solution, merely a workaround | 16:40 |
| evrardjp | odyssey4me: I agree. | 16:40 |
| evrardjp | which could be a focus in the future ! :D | 16:40 |
| *** sar has quit IRC | 16:40 | |
| evrardjp | (I am trying to sell this one very hard!) | 16:40 |
| evrardjp | anyway | 16:40 |
| odyssey4me | currently it deploys the current branch for all things except the role being tested, it then deploys the previous branch role, then deploys the current branch role | 16:41 |
| evrardjp | I think we are safe to mark this as confirmed. | 16:41 |
| evrardjp | odyssey4me: yes | 16:41 |
| evrardjp | and under ansible 2.4 it doesn't do previous for all tasks | 16:41 |
| odyssey4me | so it's not as simple as just switching the ansible version, because that may not work with the new roles for all the infra | 16:41 |
| evrardjp | it does for the main.yml includes, but not their includes. | 16:41 |
| evrardjp | no I meant just before the os_previous_role | 16:42 |
| evrardjp | the rest being still the current version | 16:42 |
| odyssey4me | oh bother - I've seen a pretty nasty pattern to do the different types of includes based on ansible version, but it's almost unreadable | 16:42 |
| evrardjp | no that's not what I meant | 16:42 |
| evrardjp | we do have many playbooks | 16:42 |
| evrardjp | the last ones are doing the previous branch role execution, then the current branch role execution and the functional testing | 16:43 |
| evrardjp | I'd insert a ansible downgrade based on tests/common/previous before the previous branch execution, and an ansible upgrade based on tests/common | 16:44 |
| evrardjp | but that's all a mess IMO | 16:44 |
| odyssey4me | if we can finalise getting the integrated build to using a static inventory then we can switch the roles to using it instead of something else | 16:44 |
| odyssey4me | hmm, that could work - messy as you say, but workable | 16:44 |
| odyssey4me | another option could just be to be rid of tox and to use two venvs | 16:44 |
| odyssey4me | one for current, one for previous | 16:45 |
| evrardjp | that sounds nice | 16:45 |
| odyssey4me | instead of using tox to build the venv, do it ourself | 16:45 |
| evrardjp | so we'd have to run x shell tasks, one to do the infra, one to do the old role with previous venv, the rest? | 16:45 |
| evrardjp | and one with the rest* | 16:46 |
| evrardjp | that sounds cleaner in the meantime we reform stuff. | 16:46 |
| odyssey4me | well, tox is just running scripts anyway - so we just switch to zuul executing the scripts and make the scripts facilitate everything | 16:46 |
| odyssey4me | I did hope to get to doing that this cycle, but time has not been kind. | 16:47 |
| evrardjp | that is interesting. But just to make sure we are in sync, we'll not change the stable/pike code to make the code work under ansible 2.3 and ansible 2.4 | 16:47 |
| evrardjp | because that was also an option | 16:47 |
| evrardjp | (not the handlers part, but at least adapting the includes) | 16:47 |
| odyssey4me | I'd rather avoid changing the previous branch to cater for the current dev head. | 16:47 |
| odyssey4me | The only reason to port stuff back is to make it easier to keep the test implementations more maintainable. | 16:48 |
| evrardjp | It makes sense to me. | 16:48 |
| odyssey4me | But that would be the test implementations only, not the main body of role code. | 16:48 |
| evrardjp | yeah here it would change the body of the code to change the include from include: includefile.yml to include: "{{ roledir }}/includefile.yml" | 16:49 |
| evrardjp | I saw there is another config thing that could alter that loading, so i will double check if that's not something we could do | 16:50 |
| evrardjp | ok let's mark this as confirmed and critical because it blocks gates, but we'll discuss implementation details later | 16:51 |
| odyssey4me | sure | 16:52 |
| evrardjp | next | 16:52 |
| evrardjp | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1741462 | 16:52 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1741462 in openstack-ansible "P-Q upgrade fails due to change in inventory" [Undecided,New] | 16:52 |
| *** chyka has joined #openstack-ansible | 16:52 | |
| evrardjp | another one I'd consider critical | 16:52 |
| odyssey4me | confirmed, crit | 16:52 |
| evrardjp | not possible to upgrade right now | 16:52 |
| evrardjp | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1741247 | 16:53 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1741247 in openstack-ansible "Upgrade from Ocata fails with timeout" [Undecided,New] | 16:53 |
| odyssey4me | it's breaking upgrades, and we're nearing the end of the cycle | 16:53 |
| odyssey4me | our timeout is already too long - infra doesn't like longer than 3 hrs and we have 4 IIRC | 16:53 |
| evrardjp | that's bad news. | 16:54 |
| odyssey4me | that said, it's old code - not much we can do | 16:54 |
| evrardjp | any idea of what we can do for that then? | 16:54 |
| evrardjp | Manual testing and removing the periodics? | 16:54 |
| evrardjp | that doesn't sound better. | 16:54 |
| odyssey4me | only option might be to use 100% serial values for the initial deploy to try and cut time - or to cut the number of containers down like we have for master | 16:54 |
| evrardjp | master has seen lots of performance improvements | 16:55 |
| evrardjp | maybe the 100% serial would be a good temp fix | 16:55 |
| evrardjp | let's mark this as confirmed and critical too? | 16:55 |
| odyssey4me | yup | 16:55 |
| *** smatzek has quit IRC | 16:56 | |
| evrardjp | next | 16:56 |
| evrardjp | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1741235 | 16:56 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1741235 in openstack-ansible "Shallow cloning doesn't work during repo-build" [Undecided,New] | 16:56 |
| evrardjp | I'd say this is a whishlist | 16:56 |
| odyssey4me | yes | 16:57 |
| *** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible | 16:57 | |
| evrardjp | we can consider this as opinion too | 16:57 |
| odyssey4me | it doesn't matter too much - and is part of the longer term plan for the python deploy bits anyway | 16:57 |
| evrardjp | opinion -> "doesn't fit the project plan" | 16:58 |
| evrardjp | ok let's mark it as wishlist then | 16:58 |
| evrardjp | last for today | 16:58 |
| evrardjp | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible/+bug/1741225 | 16:58 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1741225 in openstack-ansible "Check for NOPASSWD in sudo configuration can't be disabled" [Undecided,New] | 16:58 |
| odyssey4me | reality is that infra is planning to publish all services to pypi some time in the future so we won't *have* to use SHA's - we'll be able to just use pypi with appropriate pins | 16:58 |
| *** smatzek_ has joined #openstack-ansible | 16:59 | |
| evrardjp | odyssey4me: that is good when we think about it. | 16:59 |
| evrardjp | for last bug, mhayden are you there? | 16:59 |
| odyssey4me | looks like mhayden has confirmed | 16:59 |
| odyssey4me | maybe low/med | 16:59 |
| *** smatzek_ has quit IRC | 17:00 | |
| evrardjp | ok let's mark this as confirmed and med | 17:00 |
| evrardjp | thanks everyone! | 17:00 |
| *** smatzek_ has joined #openstack-ansible | 17:00 | |
| *** ThomasSch_ has quit IRC | 17:00 | |
| evrardjp | next week's gonna be though too :( | 17:00 |
| evrardjp | we have many big ones remaining in the list | 17:00 |
| evrardjp | anyway, thanks for your time all! | 17:00 |
| evrardjp | #endmeeting | 17:00 |
| *** openstack changes topic to "Launchpad: https://launchpad.net/openstack-ansible || Weekly Meetings: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/openstack-ansible || Review Dashboard: https://goo.gl/tTmdgs" | 17:00 | |
| openstack | Meeting ended Tue Jan 9 17:00:41 2018 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | 17:00 |
| openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2018/openstack_ansible_meeting.2018-01-09-15.59.html | 17:00 |
| openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2018/openstack_ansible_meeting.2018-01-09-15.59.txt | 17:00 |
| openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_ansible_meeting/2018/openstack_ansible_meeting.2018-01-09-15.59.log.html | 17:00 |
| odyssey4me | thx evrardjp | 17:00 |
| *** smatzek has quit IRC | 17:02 | |
| hwoarang | thank you | 17:03 |
| cloudnull | ++ thanks evrardjp | 17:04 |
| ashak | i'm still having issues on centos, where during running os-cinder-install.yml, the task 'galera_client : Install galera distro packages' wants to install packages on one of my infra nodes and is failing with messages like: file /etc/my.cnf from install of MariaDB-common-10.1.30-1.el7.centos.x86_64 conflicts with file from package mariadb-config-3:10.1.20-2.el7.x86_64 | 17:05 |
| *** sar has joined #openstack-ansible | 17:07 | |
| RandomTech | hey a have two questions | 17:09 |
| openstackgerrit | Jesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Fix sources-branch-updater and add docs https://review.openstack.org/529377 | 17:10 |
| hwoarang | ashak: would it be possible to file a bug so we can track it? | 17:10 |
| hwoarang | sounds like a simple solution would be to remove mariadb-config before installing packages but it's easier to track it in a bug | 17:11 |
| spotz | odyssey4me: I'm gonna grammar police your rst for that patch if that's ok. I'll put a -1 on it so folks know I'll be doing it as I might not get to it until later | 17:12 |
| ashak | hwoarang: sure. where does one file bugs? | 17:12 |
| hwoarang | ashak: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-ansible | 17:13 |
| ashak | oh yeah, silly me :) | 17:13 |
| *** chhavi__ has quit IRC | 17:14 | |
| *** smatzek_ has quit IRC | 17:15 | |
| *** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible | 17:15 | |
| *** epalper has quit IRC | 17:15 | |
| odyssey4me | spotz go ahead - I won't be doing any more mods until tomorrow, so feel free to fix up my terrible grammar through your day | 17:19 |
| spotz | odyssey4me: Aww it's not so bad just some nits:) | 17:20 |
| *** smatzek has quit IRC | 17:21 | |
| *** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible | 17:29 | |
| *** smatzek has quit IRC | 17:30 | |
| *** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible | 17:30 | |
| *** smatzek has quit IRC | 17:31 | |
| *** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible | 17:32 | |
| *** nshetty has quit IRC | 17:35 | |
| *** smatzek has quit IRC | 17:36 | |
| *** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible | 17:37 | |
| *** smatzek has quit IRC | 17:39 | |
| *** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible | 17:40 | |
| RandomTech | hey i noticed something about the documentation that may need updated | 17:42 |
| *** smatzek has quit IRC | 17:44 | |
| *** mbuil has quit IRC | 17:45 | |
| *** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible | 17:46 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 17:47 | |
| *** sxc731 has quit IRC | 17:48 | |
| *** gkadam has quit IRC | 17:49 | |
| *** smatzek has quit IRC | 17:50 | |
| *** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible | 17:51 | |
| *** smatzek has quit IRC | 17:56 | |
| *** eumel8 has quit IRC | 17:58 | |
| *** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible | 17:58 | |
| *** smatzek has quit IRC | 18:03 | |
| *** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible | 18:03 | |
| RandomTech | andymccr: are you avaible for a minute? | 18:04 |
| *** rmcall has joined #openstack-ansible | 18:05 | |
| *** hamza21 has joined #openstack-ansible | 18:10 | |
| *** hamza21 has quit IRC | 18:17 | |
| *** MikeW has quit IRC | 18:22 | |
| *** esberglu has quit IRC | 18:31 | |
| *** esberglu has joined #openstack-ansible | 18:31 | |
| *** lihi has quit IRC | 18:47 | |
| *** oanson has quit IRC | 18:48 | |
| *** gkadam has joined #openstack-ansible | 18:57 | |
| *** poopcat has joined #openstack-ansible | 19:09 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-ansible | 19:13 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 19:13 | |
| *** poopcat1 has joined #openstack-ansible | 19:14 | |
| RandomTech | hey cloudnull got a sec? | 19:16 |
| *** poopcat has quit IRC | 19:16 | |
| cloudnull | sure | 19:17 |
| cloudnull | whats up ? | 19:17 |
| RandomTech | is it okay if setup-hosts fails on get modern pip but sucsedes on Get Modern PIP using fallback URL | 19:19 |
| RandomTech | i noticed our playbook did that | 19:21 |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-ansible | 19:23 | |
| RandomTech | the rest of the playbook seems to have ran fine however | 19:23 |
| *** madorn has quit IRC | 19:25 | |
| *** madorn has joined #openstack-ansible | 19:27 | |
| *** stuartgr has quit IRC | 19:28 | |
| *** gkadam has quit IRC | 19:32 | |
| *** savvas`_ has joined #openstack-ansible | 19:34 | |
| *** savvas` has quit IRC | 19:35 | |
| *** savvas`_ has quit IRC | 19:35 | |
| *** savvas` has joined #openstack-ansible | 19:35 | |
| *** savvas` has quit IRC | 19:37 | |
| RandomTech | any idea cloudnull ? | 19:42 |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 19:42 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-ansible | 19:43 | |
| *** woodard has quit IRC | 19:43 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 19:48 | |
| *** woodard has joined #openstack-ansible | 19:49 | |
| cloudnull | RandomTech: sorry. walked away a min | 20:01 |
| cloudnull | back now | 20:01 |
| cloudnull | yes that should be fine | 20:01 |
| cloudnull | if it succeeds using the fall back url everything should be ok | 20:01 |
| cloudnull | RandomTech: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/530959/ | 20:02 |
| RandomTech | Sounds good, going to run the second playbook now | 20:02 |
| cloudnull | I implemented that change, which I think would be good to backport. | 20:02 |
| RandomTech | i do have 1 comment on the documentation however | 20:02 |
| cloudnull | that PR will tell you if there was an actual failure | 20:03 |
| cloudnull | what's up with the docs? | 20:03 |
| cloudnull | if any cores are around that could give pr 530959 a push it'd be appreciated. | 20:03 |
| RandomTech | the documentation is marked 16.0.6 however it has you clone version 16.0.5 here: https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/openstack-ansible/pike/deploymenthost.html | 20:04 |
| RandomTech | in the install source and dependencies task | 20:05 |
| RandomTech | better link: https://docs.openstack.org/project-deploy-guide/openstack-ansible/pike/deploymenthost.html#install-the-source-and-dependencies | 20:05 |
| cloudnull | ah. | 20:09 |
| cloudnull | sorry was looking at this a bit cross eyed. | 20:09 |
| cloudnull | I think the online documentation only ever points to the current stable branch | 20:10 |
| cloudnull | when the tag is cut for 16.0.6 that tag version will be updated. | 20:10 |
| * cloudnull if i'm not mistaken | 20:11 | |
| *** armaan has quit IRC | 20:22 | |
| *** armaan has joined #openstack-ansible | 20:23 | |
| *** Smeared_Beard has quit IRC | 20:27 | |
| RandomTech | logan-: you availible for a moment? | 20:31 |
| logan- | yep, what's up | 20:31 |
| RandomTech | were getting this error when running setup-infrastructure: please provide devices to your osd scenario | 20:33 |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-ansible | 20:33 | |
| RandomTech | its under: ceph-osd : verify devices have been provided | 20:33 |
| RandomTech | cant tell where we provide them in the configs however | 20:33 |
| *** SmearedBeard has joined #openstack-ansible | 20:33 | |
| logan- | if all of the osd systems are using the same disk layout you could drop it in user_variables | 20:34 |
| logan- | let me find the ceph-ansible docs on how to define that | 20:34 |
| logan- | https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/blob/master/group_vars/osds.yml.sample | 20:35 |
| logan- | best to read thru this whole file | 20:35 |
| logan- | any of the variables in there that you'd like to set can be done in OSA's user_variables.yml | 20:36 |
| RandomTech | thats what ive been doing | 20:37 |
| RandomTech | not seeing where that would be, may see is ceph ansible is active | 20:37 |
| RandomTech | thers only 1 guy there i must have the wrong one | 20:38 |
| logan- | are you confused on where to set the variables? which variables you need to set? or what to put in them? | 20:39 |
| *** sar has quit IRC | 20:39 | |
| RandomTech | what to set | 20:40 |
| RandomTech | how to define what osd to use | 20:40 |
| logan- | https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/blob/97f520bc7488b8e09d4057783049c8975fbc336e/group_vars/osds.yml.sample#L72-L81 example there | 20:41 |
| logan- | if you are splitting the journal from the data disk, you'll also need to define dedicated_devices: https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/blob/97f520bc7488b8e09d4057783049c8975fbc336e/group_vars/osds.yml.sample#L137-L155 | 20:42 |
| *** armaan has quit IRC | 20:44 | |
| RandomTech | do you know if splitting data and journal is needed? | 20:47 |
| logan- | it is not needed if you choose the collocated scenario | 20:48 |
| *** SmearedBeard has quit IRC | 20:52 | |
| RandomTech | would i put this under cinder backends? | 20:52 |
| openstackgerrit | David Moreau Simard proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: DNM: Get ara database https://review.openstack.org/532309 | 20:57 |
| *** SmearedBeard has joined #openstack-ansible | 20:58 | |
| openstackgerrit | Kevin Carter (cloudnull) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Add scaffolding for multiple container techs https://review.openstack.org/527749 | 21:02 |
| RandomTech | anyone have an example of a osa ceph deploy where they defined devices | 21:02 |
| logan- | RandomTech: no, it'll need to be available under the OSD hosts.. so either place it in container_vars like you would cinder_backends, except under your osd hosts | 21:03 |
| logan- | or define these vars in user_variables.yml where they'll be available on all of the hosts | 21:03 |
| RandomTech | ya im trying to figure out exactly where to define them in user_variable.yml and what format | 21:04 |
| RandomTech | also sorry logan- im fairly new to this | 21:05 |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 21:13 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-ansible | 21:13 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 21:17 | |
| *** RandomTech has quit IRC | 21:19 | |
| *** strgout has joined #openstack-ansible | 21:19 | |
| *** smatzek has quit IRC | 21:24 | |
| *** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible | 21:24 | |
| *** smatzek has quit IRC | 21:24 | |
| *** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible | 21:24 | |
| *** smatzek has quit IRC | 21:24 | |
| *** smatzek has joined #openstack-ansible | 21:25 | |
| *** smatzek has quit IRC | 21:30 | |
| *** pcaruana has quit IRC | 21:38 | |
| *** dave-mccowan has quit IRC | 21:40 | |
| *** threestrands has joined #openstack-ansible | 21:44 | |
| *** threestrands has quit IRC | 21:44 | |
| *** threestrands has joined #openstack-ansible | 21:44 | |
| *** rmcall has quit IRC | 21:52 | |
| openstackgerrit | Amy Marrich (spotz) proposed openstack/openstack-ansible master: Fix sources-branch-updater and add docs https://review.openstack.org/529377 | 21:56 |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-ansible | 22:29 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 22:30 | |
| *** zerick_ has quit IRC | 22:33 | |
| *** zerick has joined #openstack-ansible | 22:34 | |
| *** afred312 has quit IRC | 22:36 | |
| *** zerick has quit IRC | 22:49 | |
| *** afred312 has joined #openstack-ansible | 23:06 | |
| *** chhavi__ has joined #openstack-ansible | 23:11 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-ansible | 23:11 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 23:11 | |
| *** afred312 has quit IRC | 23:11 | |
| *** chhavi__ has quit IRC | 23:15 | |
| *** afred312 has joined #openstack-ansible | 23:20 | |
| *** pmannidi has joined #openstack-ansible | 23:24 | |
| *** markvoelker has joined #openstack-ansible | 23:43 | |
| *** markvoelker has quit IRC | 23:43 | |
| *** ianw has quit IRC | 23:50 | |
| *** ianw has joined #openstack-ansible | 23:51 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!