*** ysandeep|out is now known as ysandeep | 05:47 | |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|lunch | 08:16 | |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored floating_ip and floating_ip_info modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/828613 | 09:00 |
---|---|---|
*** jpodivin__ is now known as jpodivin | 09:33 | |
*** ysandeep|lunch is now known as ysandeep | 10:37 | |
*** dviroel|out is now known as dviroel | 11:41 | |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|away | 12:20 | |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored stack_info module and allow to filter by owner and project names https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/859540 | 12:56 |
opendevreview | Rafael Castillo proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Updates volume for 2.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/853749 | 13:53 |
*** ysandeep|away is now known as ysandeep | 14:31 | |
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|dr_appt | 14:52 | |
opendevreview | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Do not enforce optional params in network module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/861767 | 14:52 |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|out | 15:44 | |
*** dviroel|dr_appt is now known as dviroel | 16:49 | |
abyss44 | hi all, I'm running into a small problem and have been trying to search through storyboard/github/etc. to see if it's a bug or something else, but when I am trying to use openstack.cloud.security_group_rule with direction: egress, port_range_min, port_range_max, and remote_ip_prefix, I get an error from openstack saying "Security group rule already exists". even if I clear the security | 22:26 |
abyss44 | group rules via openstack web GUI, then re-add with Ansible, it works the first time but fails on subsequent runs. I am using openstack.cloud version 1.10.0. | 22:26 |
abyss44 | what's kind of weird is that my ingress rules are working correctly and are idempotent. egress does not appear to work the same way though. | 22:26 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!