| *** rlandy is now known as rlandy|out | 01:27 | |
| *** ysandeep|away is now known as ysandeep | 04:49 | |
| opendevreview | Arx Cruz proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update federation_mapping_info module to use proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/849283 | 07:43 |
|---|---|---|
| opendevreview | Arx Cruz proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update federation_mapping_info module to use proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/849283 | 07:44 |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|lunch | 08:22 | |
| *** ysandeep|lunch is now known as ysandeep | 09:00 | |
| *** rlandy|out is now known as rlandy|rover | 10:20 | |
| *** anbanerj is now known as frenzyfriday | 10:26 | |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|afk | 10:34 | |
| *** ysandeep|afk is now known as ysandeep | 12:03 | |
| opendevreview | Ananya proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Makes stack module compatible with new sdk version https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/848266 | 12:16 |
| -opendevstatus- NOTICE: As of the weekend, Zuul only supports queue declarations at the project level; if expected jobs aren't running, see this announcement: https://lists.opendev.org/pipermail/service-announce/2022-September/000044.html | 13:37 | |
| *** rcastillo|rover is now known as rcastillo | 14:11 | |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|dinner | 14:58 | |
| *** ysandeep|dinner is now known as ysandeep | 16:02 | |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|out | 16:03 | |
| rcastillo | jm1: any idea why ansible-collections-openstack-functional-devstack-releases doesn't pick up my depends-on here? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/857976 | 16:15 |
| jm1 | rcastillo: *-releases installs latest openstacksdk release via pip | 18:24 |
| rcastillo | jm1: ack | 18:27 |
| jm1 | rcastillo: maybe set it non-voting in your patch and add a comment to .zuul.yaml and commit message? | 18:29 |
| rcastillo | is that really a good idea? Maybe better to wait for changes to land in sdk | 18:32 |
| jm1 | rcastillo: then you wont be able to merge any patches | 18:35 |
| rcastillo | jm1: only this patch that depends on sdk change, right? | 18:36 |
| jm1 | rcastillo: sure | 18:38 |
| rcastillo | if we want to set the releases job to non-voting that should be its own patch | 18:39 |
| jm1 | rcastillo: it depends. doing it in the affected patch keeps its context and allows us to understand more easily later, why it was set to non-voting | 18:41 |
| jm1 | rcastillo: but it might still be better to simply ask gtema to release a new sdk 0.99.x release once we have a sufficient number of changes | 18:42 |
| rcastillo | jm1: we're on 0.101.0 already ;) | 18:46 |
| rcastillo | but yeah, I get that | 18:46 |
| rcastillo | I'll set to non-voting here and make a note of reverting | 18:46 |
| jm1 | rcastillo: oh nice. will not save zed either ;P | 18:48 |
| *** rlandy|rover is now known as rlandy|out | 22:50 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!