*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|out | 00:08 | |
*** ysandeep|out is now known as ysandeep | 01:19 | |
opendevreview | Rafael Castillo proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update compute flavor module for 2.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/850069 | 02:01 |
---|---|---|
opendevreview | Rafael Castillo proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update compute flavor module for 2.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/850069 | 05:19 |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|afk | 06:08 | |
*** ysandeep|afk is now known as ysandeep|lunch | 08:00 | |
*** undefined is now known as Guest6176 | 08:19 | |
*** undefined is now known as Guest6178 | 09:23 | |
*** ysandeep|lunch is now known as ysandeep | 10:01 | |
opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored server and server_info modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/849423 | 10:15 |
*** rlandy|out is now known as rlandy | 10:34 | |
opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Dropped default module options https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/851208 | 10:42 |
opendevreview | Shnaidman Sagi (Sergey) proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Don't use deprecated distutils from python 3.10 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/851210 | 10:53 |
*** dviroel|out is now known as dviroel | 11:35 | |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|break | 12:19 | |
*** ysandeep|break is now known as ysandeep | 12:58 | |
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|biab | 13:17 | |
*** rlandy|biab is now known as rlandy | 13:33 | |
sshnaidm | gtema, hey | 13:39 |
sshnaidm | gtema, I was watching your conversation about having issues/repos on Github. Very interesting and would be very useful for AOC as well. But I didn't see how it ended, was some conclusion or solution taken? | 13:41 |
opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored server and server_info modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/849423 | 13:58 |
opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored port and port_info modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/850627 | 14:02 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Dropped default module options https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/851208 | 14:03 |
opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Don't use deprecated distutils from python 3.10 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/851210 | 14:03 |
jm1 | sshnaidm: ^ where was this discussion? (so i could read up) | 14:11 |
gtema | sshnaidm: the discussion was actually more toward having them on gitea (opendev.org). It didn't end up anywhere except of limbo. I just know that currently gitea of opendev is running in read only mode. | 14:39 |
gtema | in order to have issues there it is required to redeploy gitea and enable the flag on the repo, but that requires somebody taking care of that (if I got it right) | 14:40 |
gtema | on the other side, sadly nobody really commented positively in that email thread and instead sadly a very often "we do not want a yet another tracker" statement was made | 14:41 |
sshnaidm | jm1, https://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-June/029168.html | 14:41 |
sshnaidm | I see, that's really sad | 14:41 |
sshnaidm | but we don't need "yet another bug tracker", we just want "a bug tracker" :D | 14:42 |
gtema | I have in the meanwhile created a huge stack for implementing gitea with Zuul and also that is not getting reviews (https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:gitea_driver) | 14:42 |
gtema | yeah, you are right - we just want a functioning tracker | 14:42 |
gtema | issue with gitea write mode is that you need shared storage between all nodes, and this may be not so trivial to implement depending on amount of resources infra team is having | 14:43 |
sshnaidm | I see | 14:44 |
gtema | if we want it so much we may decide to go to infra team and offer support for that step. I am "ready" to do this, but I would need to have some backing support, not that I am the only one interested in the topic | 14:46 |
sshnaidm | I think we can back you up here | 14:51 |
gtema | oko, my suggestion is then following: | 14:51 |
sshnaidm | It would be great to have something instead of half-functioning discouraging storyboard | 14:51 |
gtema | since I am next week on PTO starting somewhere Monday, Aug 8 I write to infra team (puting you in CC) asking whether/how we can support for redeploying gitea to ensure some projects can enable local issue trackers | 14:52 |
gtema | I see people just fall back to ancient launchpad as "working" solution from storyboard. We use gitea tracker for us and it just work | 14:53 |
sshnaidm | sounds good | 14:54 |
gtema | ok | 14:54 |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|out | 14:54 | |
sshnaidm | yeah, I didn't want to go to launchpad, not really best solution as well | 14:54 |
gtema | it just so similar to BZ | 14:55 |
sshnaidm | LP and SB are in close fight what is worst | 14:55 |
sshnaidm | can github based auth work in gitea? | 14:55 |
gtema | this is a second part of a technically more complex story of infra. They have Keycloak deployed and it can be used to add GH auth | 14:56 |
gtema | but it requires support to ensure accounts can be migrated from ubuntuone | 14:56 |
sshnaidm | why to migrate them? One can use either ubuntuone or gh | 14:57 |
gtema | so that gerrit+keycloak work, and there this also requires some support (this time with real programming) on the area I barely have experience in | 14:57 |
gtema | sshnaidm: in principle yes, but they want to make transition smooth | 14:57 |
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|lunch | 14:57 | |
gtema | you can ask them, but I have some link for details | 14:58 |
sshnaidm | ack | 14:58 |
* gtema is searching through tons of emails | 14:58 | |
sshnaidm | I was thinking more about ops that don't have account on ubuntuone and just want to submit an issue | 14:58 |
gtema | https://docs.opendev.org/opendev/infra-specs/latest/specs/central-auth.html | 14:59 |
*** Guest6178 is now known as rcastillo | 15:11 | |
*** dviroel|lunch is now known as dviroel | 15:52 | |
opendevreview | Rafael Castillo proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update compute flavor module for 2.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/850069 | 16:21 |
opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Don't use deprecated distutils from python 3.10 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/851210 | 16:48 |
opendevreview | Rafael Castillo proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update baremetal_inspect to be compatible with new sdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/843334 | 18:41 |
opendevreview | Rafael Castillo proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update compute flavor module for 2.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/850069 | 19:17 |
opendevreview | Rafael Castillo proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update router for 2.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/846446 | 19:28 |
opendevreview | Rafael Castillo proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update compute flavor module for 2.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/850069 | 20:40 |
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|bbl | 22:06 | |
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|afk | 22:36 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!