| *** ysandeep|out is now known as ysandeep|ruck | 01:36 | |
| ysandeep|ruck | rcastillo|rover, ++ thanks for keeping an eye on testprojects | 01:36 |
|---|---|---|
| *** ysandeep|ruck is now known as ysandeep|ruck|afk | 02:32 | |
| *** ysandeep|ruck|afk is now known as ysandeep|ruck | 03:45 | |
| ysandeep|ruck | wohoo.. 17/9 promoted | 03:45 |
| ysandeep|ruck | wohoo. master promoted.. and wallaby is promoting now | 06:03 |
| marios | nice ysandeep|ruck | 06:07 |
| marios | nice report for prog call.. any luck d/stream 16 tho? | 06:08 |
| ysandeep|ruck | 17/9 promoted as well.. just tracking 16.2 promotion | 06:08 |
| ysandeep|ruck | only 2 jobs left.. so i am hopefull we will promote 16.2 as well before prgm call | 06:08 |
| marios | great even if we don't its on its way so good stuff | 06:09 |
| ysandeep|ruck | marios, chandankumar: We don't have to report for 17/8 anymore, right ? | 06:09 |
| ysandeep|ruck | I see last week, you left a comment as well that we will drop this line.. and move to 17.1/8 | 06:10 |
| marios | ysandeep|ruck: yeah we should start reporting on 17.1 once all in place but d/stream this last week has been not great infra | 06:11 |
| ysandeep|ruck | I am wondering do we need to track 17/8 promotion anymore, before we move to 17.1? | 06:13 |
| ysandeep|ruck | I am thinking about not reporting for 17/8 today.. and we can start report for 17.1/8 once its up.. I don't think we are tracking 17/8 promotions for a while now. | 06:14 |
| marios | ack ysandeep|ruck this sounds fine + you can clarify if there are queries about it | 06:15 |
| ysandeep|ruck | marios: ack, thanks! | 06:17 |
| chandankumar | ysandeep|ruck: sounds good to report 17.1/8 once it is up and skip 17/8 | 06:22 |
| ysandeep|ruck | chandankumar, thanks! | 06:22 |
| *** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 06:35 | |
| frenzyfriday | bot add to review list https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/openstack/rrcockpit/+/422917 | 06:40 |
| reviewbot | I have added your review to the Review list | 06:40 |
| ysandeep|ruck | chandankumar, I noticed some of the jobs removed here https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/44455/5#message-fbaaae7d1978e53c3c5b372a44847cb2f2a0cb43 are still parent of some jobs | 07:13 |
| ysandeep|ruck | chandankumar, could you please crosscheck | 07:13 |
| *** jpena|off is now known as jpena | 07:34 | |
| chandankumar | ysandeep|ruck: sure | 07:39 |
| *** ysandeep|ruck is now known as ysandeep|ruck|lunch | 08:11 | |
| frenzyfriday | hey, for any changes to the internal cockpit do we usually attach screenshot to the commit msg like we do for upstream cockpit changes? (because of internal data and stuff) | 08:28 |
| marios | frenzyfriday: if it is for code.eng change then should be fine but for anything in ci-config/anywhere else upstream then no | 08:29 |
| frenzyfriday | marios, thanks. For example this patch: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/openstack/rrcockpit/+/422917 | 08:32 |
| marios | opendev.org proxy error here anyone else? | 08:34 |
| soniya29 | marios same i recieved | 08:34 |
| marios | frenzyfriday: so without looking it is code.eng so it is only accessible inside vpn | 08:34 |
| marios | thx soniya29 | 08:34 |
| frenzyfriday | marios, yep, oh right! you mean the snaoshot will be behind vpn!! ack, thanks | 08:35 |
| marios | frenzyfriday: yeah thats what i meant if it is code.eng then sure you can attach but otherwise no | 08:35 |
| frenzyfriday | but it will be publeished to https://snapshot.raintank.io/ or somewhere right? | 08:36 |
| soniya29 | marios, any idea what is wrong with opendev.org? | 08:36 |
| marios | frenzyfriday: hmm that is a good question ... if you cant find a good answer then try screenshot ? there is internal image sharing service will find gimme couple mins | 08:36 |
| marios | soniya29: they are checking see #opendev | 08:36 |
| marios | 11:32 < frickler> I can confirm that gerrit seems to have issues, checking logs now | 08:36 |
| marios | 11:34 < marios> ah k already known then | 08:36 |
| marios | soniya29: ^ | 08:37 |
| soniya29 | marios, thanks :) | 08:37 |
| *** ysandeep|ruck|lunch is now known as ysandeep|ruck | 08:39 | |
| ysandeep|ruck | I don't want to jinx it with a gate blocker but what a lovely day it is.. 16.2 and 17.1/9 both promoted as well. | 08:40 |
| ysandeep|ruck | so if we promote 17/8 also - we are completely green (everything promoted today/or nothing to promote) | 08:41 |
| marios | ysandeep|ruck: lets go to the beach :D leave a voice note for the program call | 08:43 |
| marios | \o/ | 08:43 |
| marios | 'sorry tripleo ci cant take your call right now. everything is green we're at the beach' | 08:43 |
| ysandeep|ruck | hahahaha, lol!.. yeah we such definitely go to beach \o/ | 08:44 |
| ysandeep|ruck | yeah we should* definitely go to beach \o/ | 08:45 |
| ysandeep|ruck | oooq ansible experts - we are facing "ERROR! couldn't resolve module/action 'freeipa.ansible_freeipa.ipapermission'" in security component. | 09:31 |
| ysandeep|ruck | https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1986755 | 09:32 |
| ysandeep|ruck | I think this started after https://review.opendev.org/c/x/tripleo-ipa/+/848255 merged, Do we need to add this collection `freeipa.ansible_freeipa` in our jobs as well? Or this collection should be shipped in our products? | 09:33 |
| ysandeep|ruck | marios, chandankumar jm1[m] ^^ when you have a free slot, appreciate some suggestions.. I have already pinged security team for this bug and awaiting their feedback. | 09:34 |
| chandankumar | ysandeep|ruck: checking | 09:42 |
| marios | ysandeep|ruck: immediate reqaction is that we should add to our jobs | 09:48 |
| marios | ysandeep|ruck: perhaps try posting it (I think in tripleo-ci repo we're installing collections in toci_quickstart.sh.j2 | 09:49 |
| marios | ysandeep|ruck: and testproject to see if it helps? | 09:49 |
| ysandeep|ruck | chatting with adee_lee on #sec-interop (internal) - ansible-freeipa modules comes via rpm ansible-freeipa , https://brewweb.engineering.redhat.com/brew/packageinfo?packageID=71926 | 09:50 |
| ysandeep|ruck | But I see its installed in both supplemental(ipa) and undercloud - https://logserver.rdoproject.org/46/28446/84/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-ovb-3ctlr_1comp_1supp-featureset039-security-master/e4a4d9d/logs/supplemental/var/log/extra/package-list-installed.txt.gz | 09:50 |
| chandankumar | ysandeep|ruck: https://github.com/rdo-packages/tripleo-ipa-distgit/blob/rpm-master/ansible-tripleo-ipa.spec#L36 | 09:52 |
| chandankumar | ansible-freeipa is already installed there | 09:52 |
| chandankumar | so we donot need to add the collection there | 09:52 |
| chandankumar | I think | 09:53 |
| chandankumar | I was checking the playbook https://github.com/freeipa/ansible-freeipa/blob/v1.8.2/README-host.md | 09:53 |
| marios | ysandeep|ruck: thinking about that https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/src/commit/5c6c62db174b818edc48abd2fc721b20f20176fb/quickstart.sh#L108-L114 | 09:53 |
| marios | dont see freeipa there chandankumar ^^ | 09:53 |
| marios | or https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/src/branch/master/ansible-collection-requirements.yml | 09:53 |
| marios | ysandeep|ruck: ^ maybe adding there may unblock? | 09:54 |
| chandankumar | we can try replacing https://opendev.org/x/tripleo-ipa/src/branch/master/tripleo_ipa/roles/tripleo_ipa_registration/tasks/main.yml#L48 to ipahost and try | 09:54 |
| ysandeep|ruck | yeah, I was of same understanding that if it comes via rpm as a part of tripleo.. we don't have to install in quickstart.. | 09:54 |
| chandankumar | ysandeep|ruck: may be go with both approach | 09:54 |
| chandankumar | adding the collection in qucikstart and replacing it with with ipahost | 09:55 |
| chandankumar | and test it in two different patches | 09:55 |
| ysandeep|ruck | move to freeipa.ansible_freeipa.ipahost was intentional here https://review.opendev.org/c/x/tripleo-ipa/+/848255 | 09:56 |
| ysandeep|ruck | marios, thanks for the pointer, will check that approach, I am trying to understand the reasoning behind - why we need to install collection via quickstart if we have rpm already(which provides that collection) | 09:58 |
| *** ysandeep|ruck is now known as ysandeep|afk | 10:35 | |
| * ysandeep|afk break | 10:35 | |
| marios | soniya29: do you want to discuss something today? i cant hear you if you are talking | 11:16 |
| marios | otherwise lets drop if folks are busy | 11:16 |
| *** ysandeep|afk is now known as ysandeep|ruck | 11:30 | |
| soniya29 | marios..sorry, mic issues | 11:32 |
| *** dviroel|afk is now known as dviroel | 11:32 | |
| marios | soniya29: glad you were able to resolve them | 11:35 |
| soniya29 | arxcruz, marios, can you both please have a look over this patch - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/851963 | 11:37 |
| marios | adding to my list soniya29 | 11:40 |
| soniya29 | marios thanks | 11:41 |
| *** ysandeep|ruck is now known as ysandeep|ruck|mtg | 11:57 | |
| *** ysandeep|ruck|mtg is now known as ysandeep|ruck | 12:24 | |
| ysandeep|ruck | regarding freeipa collection.. I think we can update https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/src/branch/master/ansible.cfg#L19 as an alternative too. | 12:25 |
| marios | folks please add to reviews when you get a chance https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/853167/2#message-9c8832adf5bcaf36f532a8111b2b1fb69fd9bb96 | 12:39 |
| reviewbot | Do you want me to add your patch to the Review list? Please type something like add to review list <your_patch> so that I can understand. Thanks. | 12:39 |
| marios | thanks for reviews so far | 12:39 |
| reviewbot | Do you want me to add your patch to the Review list? Please type something like add to review list <your_patch> so that I can understand. Thanks. | 12:39 |
| marios | dviroel: grateful for review when you have time please https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/853167/2#message-9c8832adf5bcaf36f532a8111b2b1fb69fd9bb96 | 12:39 |
| dviroel | marios: will do | 12:40 |
| ysandeep|ruck | chandankumar++ thanks! | 12:51 |
| dviroel | marios: wrt quincy repos, do you think that we should go with quickstart first or wait for a deloream-deps updates? | 13:08 |
| dviroel | marios: this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/852731/1#message-9719704104194be88a14ca2f51f34a9314c451be | 13:08 |
| marios | dviroel: ack if you have a way forward and it is faster than updating deps then fine | 13:10 |
| fpantano | dviroel: marios o/ | 13:10 |
| marios | thanks for voting on my tqe patch dviroel | 13:10 |
| marios | dviroel: but delorean-deps should be updated anyway | 13:11 |
| marios | dviroel: i.e. lets not confuse the way we are currently working with ceph | 13:11 |
| marios | dviroel: let me write on the patch might be easier to keep context one place | 13:11 |
| marios | fpantano: o/ | 13:11 |
| fpantano | also I'm not sure how to update delorean-deps | 13:12 |
| fpantano | I know we can overwrite that repo from quickstart | 13:12 |
| fpantano | but yeah, the last step should be having delorean-deps providing quincy | 13:12 |
| fpantano | and then we can revert the quickstart patch | 13:12 |
| fpantano | w/o having issues | 13:12 |
| fpantano | or breaking CI in terms of rpms | 13:13 |
| dviroel | fpantano: yeah, that's the plan | 13:13 |
| fpantano | dviroel: marios as long as you're ready we can merge the quickstart patch and then promote (in sequence) the quincy container | 13:14 |
| * fpantano following dviroel on this | 13:14 | |
| marios | ack from me dviroel sounds good | 13:16 |
| marios | akahat: o/ fyi looks good https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/852733/2#message-7dbeb694e663e78592b7c61560818a8a601fddfa | 13:17 |
| marios | akahat: please try and sell it i'd like to merge periodic by friday if possible | 13:17 |
| marios | akahat: add to reviews list etc | 13:17 |
| reviewbot | Do you want me to add your patch to the Review list? Please type something like add to review list <your_patch> so that I can understand. Thanks. | 13:17 |
| marios | akahat: try bribing people, blackmail etc | 13:17 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 13:18 | |
| akahat | marios, yeah.. sure.. let's start with you.. hey marios o/ could you please +2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/852733/ and if possible +w. :) | 13:21 |
| marios | akahat: i did | 13:21 |
| akahat | marios, +w? | 13:21 |
| marios | akahat: it has -1 from zuul and you need another vote | 13:22 |
| marios | akahat: so start selling it ;) | 13:22 |
| akahat | marios, convincing zuul to go faster will not work .. :I | 13:23 |
| marios | akahat: is it on the reviews list? | 13:23 |
| reviewbot | Do you want me to add your patch to the Review list? Please type something like add to review list <your_patch> so that I can understand. Thanks. | 13:23 |
| marios | yes it is | 13:23 |
| akahat | and i can't blackmail it. :D | 13:23 |
| marios | akahat: k if you dont get votes by tomorrow, ask folks to review in this channel | 13:23 |
| akahat | marios, yes. I'll :) | 13:24 |
| marios | chandankumar: when you next have some time please revisit https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/852733 | 13:25 |
| chandankumar | marios: sure | 13:26 |
| rcastillo|rover | o/ | 13:31 |
| *** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 13:53 | |
| arxcruz | akahat jpodivin is around | 14:13 |
| dviroel | marios: do you know if we need to update this too? is this being used on internal ci? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/852731/1/config/release/centosci/CentOS-9/master-current-tripleo.yml | 14:15 |
| marios | dviroel: not sure if/where that is being used i don't know and cant see from quick search | 14:16 |
| marios | dviroel: if we don't know then avoid it and add if something breaks rather than just adding it | 14:16 |
| dviroel | marios: yeah, I think in the same way | 14:19 |
| dviroel | ysandeep|ruck: hey, quick question, where we use this file https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/852731/1/config/release/centosci/CentOS-9/master-current-tripleo.yml#79 ? | 14:19 |
| ysandeep|ruck | centos ci | 14:20 |
| dviroel | hum | 14:20 |
| * dviroel it is the path | 14:20 | |
| * dviroel in the path* | 14:20 | |
| marios | :D | 14:21 |
| *** dasm|off is now known as dasm | 14:22 | |
| dasm | o/ | 14:22 |
| dviroel | ysandeep|ruck: another quick question, do we use this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/852731/1/config/release/trunk/master.yml ? | 14:25 |
| dviroel | I see lots of centos-8 things there | 14:25 |
| dviroel | probably no | 14:25 |
| dasm | ysandeep|ruck: when you're free you might give it a try on staging with rr script. I see chandankumar +Wed it | 14:30 |
| dasm | ysandeep|ruck: i'd love to see how much change there is between your and staging environments | 14:30 |
| dasm | ysandeep|ruck: thanks for +W on OVB | 14:31 |
| dasm | \( ﾟヮﾟ)/ | 14:32 |
| tosky | kopecmartin, arxcruz, chandankumar: maybe you already discussed it, but do you know what broke python-tempestconf gate jobs? | 14:49 |
| arxcruz | tosky not aware, let me check | 14:50 |
| dviroel | marios: we are going with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/852731 | 14:59 |
| marios | ack dviroel voted | 15:00 |
| dviroel | ysandeep|ruck: rcastillo|rover: we plan to move ceph-daemon to quincy on master. So any related issue, you can ping me and fpantano | 15:01 |
| rcastillo|rover | dviroel: ack, I'll keep in mind | 15:01 |
| dviroel | ysandeep|ruck: rcastillo|rover: after merging release file changes, it will break ceph jobs for some minutes, until i get ceph-daemon container promoted via testproject | 15:02 |
| ysandeep|ruck | dasm, ack will try that | 15:05 |
| ysandeep|ruck | dviroel, ack | 15:05 |
| * dviroel lunch | 15:07 | |
| *** dviroel is now known as dviroel|lunch | 15:07 | |
| ysandeep|ruck | rcastillo|rover, want to sync now? | 15:13 |
| ysandeep|ruck | reviewbot, please add to review list: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/853428/ | 15:15 |
| reviewbot | I have added your review to the Review list | 15:15 |
| ysandeep|ruck | chandankumar, ^^ could you please give me a +2 so that dviroel|lunch can +w it later.. needed for a promotion blocker testing in check/gate itself | 15:16 |
| kopecmartin | tosky: i don't , i'm trying to reproduce right now | 15:16 |
| ysandeep|ruck | chandankumar++ thank you sir | 15:19 |
| ysandeep|ruck | rcastillo|rover, you around? | 15:25 |
| * ysandeep|ruck dinner | 15:26 | |
| *** ysandeep|ruck is now known as ysandeep|ruck|afk | 15:26 | |
| tosky | kopecmartin, arxcruz : thanks | 15:28 |
| chandankumar | tosky: not aware of that | 15:29 |
| *** marios is now known as marios|out | 15:32 | |
| chandankumar | see ta! | 15:41 |
| chandankumar | see ya! | 15:41 |
| kopecmartin | tosky: arxcruz i found the problem, network service has a different URL in the endpoint list .. before its endpoint was like <IP>:9696/ and now it is <IP>:9696/networking | 15:44 |
| kopecmartin | something with that, still investigating | 15:44 |
| *** ysandeep|ruck|afk is now known as ysandeep|ruck | 15:45 | |
| arxcruz | kopecmartin ack | 15:49 |
| tosky | kopecmartin: that doesn't explain the failure on the older branches, maybe different? | 15:51 |
| kopecmartin | tosky: well, there are multiple issues, master fails due to neutron's endpoint, wallaby due to dependencies, xena and yoga seem fine and train and ussuri have dependency issues, those are too old, we should finally drop them | 15:55 |
| tosky | I guess it's time :/ | 15:55 |
| tosky | the train is late, or it derailed | 15:56 |
| *** dviroel|lunch is now known as dviroel | 16:12 | |
| *** ysandeep|ruck is now known as ysandeep|out | 16:18 | |
| *** jpena is now known as jpena|off | 16:26 | |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 16:52 | |
| *** dviroel is now known as dviroel|afk | 21:02 | |
| * dasm leaves | 22:00 | |
| dasm | take care team o/ | 22:00 |
| *** dasm is now known as dasm|off | 22:00 | |
| dasm|off | rcastillo|rover: i think you're the only left! gl&hf | 22:00 |
| rcastillo|rover | dasm|off: o/ | 22:01 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!