Tuesday, 2021-12-07

*** pojadhav|out is now known as pojadhav|rover04:14
*** ysandeep|out is now known as ysandeep05:28
*** marios is now known as marios|ruck06:23
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|lunch07:39
frenzy_fridayHey pojadhav|rover, marios|ruck is this a known error: "AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'version_tuple'", "stdout_lines": ["AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'version_tuple'" ? in TASK [python_venv_build : Create the virtualenv (if it does not exist)] 07:39
marios|ruckfrenzy_friday: yeah sec07:39
marios|ruckfrenzy_friday: add this in depends-on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/820172/ 07:40
marios|ruckfrenzy_friday: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1953032 07:40
frenzy_fridaymarios|ruck, thanks07:40
jbadiapagood morning08:13
marios|rucko/08:21
marios|ruckysandeep|lunch: sshnaidm|afk: * folks can you please vote on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/820172/9#message-95acaed557bb46c7e21b9570c2c77798deca54a9 and we can get it merged today 08:59
*** pojadhav|rover is now known as pojadhav|rover|afk09:14
*** ysandeep|lunch is now known as ysandeep09:19
frenzy_fridayI need some help with https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/37023 - I am getting Error running container image prepare: Not found image: https://trunk.registry.rdoproject.org/v2/tripleomastercentos9/openstack-glance-api/manifests/9f93da59213dc8e9f46a7a1e36936945. Do I need to run  periodic-tripleo-ci-build-containers-centos-9-push-master first ?09:20
sshnaidm|afkmarios|ruck, was it tested somewhere with 7?09:20
*** sshnaidm|afk is now known as sshnaidm09:20
sshnaidmmarios|ruck, oh, I see in the patch, nice09:20
ysandeepmarios|ruck: revoted, already voted previously on patchset609:20
marios|rucksshnaidm: thanks if you want we can also add the 7 periodics in testproject after the current run finishes09:21
marios|ruckthanks ysandeep 09:21
marios|rucksshnaidm: but yeah it has the 7-train jobs in upstream report 09:21
sshnaidmyeah, it's enough I think09:22
*** pojadhav|rover|afk is now known as pojadhav|rover09:51
Tenguhello there! Are there some issues with the container registry on rdoproject? A job is failing while trying to fetch container images - and apparently, not always the same image: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/3699810:01
Tengufrenzy_friday: ah. well. you're hitting the same kind of issues I'm seeing -^^10:02
frenzy_fridayHey Tengu, yes, I am getting  Error running container image prepare: Not found image: https://trunk.registry.rdoproject.org/v2/tripleomastercentos9/openstack-glance-api/manifests/9f93da59213dc8e9f46a7a1e36936945. Do I need to run  periodic-tripleo-ci-build-containers-centos-9-push-master first?10:04
frenzy_fridayexample, in https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/3702310:04
* frenzy_friday lunch, back in ~1hr10:04
Tengufrenzy_friday: not sure. seems the image isn't always the same.10:05
TenguI hit against keystone, then rsyslog10:05
Tengucan't say if the periodic-tripleo-ci-build-containers-centos-9-push-master is needed. Maybe?10:05
marios|ruckTengu: not sure what's up yet but the line really isn't expected to be stable at this point10:12
marios|ruckTengu: for now you can try overriding10:12
marios|ruckTengu: indeed i don't see /9f93da59213dc8e9f46a7a1e36936945 @ https://trunk.registry.rdoproject.org:8443/oapi/v1/namespaces/tripleomastercentos9/imagestreamtags/ 10:12
Tengumarios|ruck: oh, well, it's a test job for another change10:12
marios|ruckTengu: so you can try and force one of the hashes there like d416170694b13db3586554ba18096332 10:13
Tengugoal is to get https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/819845 in - Chandan wanted to get a testjob for it to be 100% sure10:13
Tengumarios|ruck: how?10:13
marios|ruckTengu: right you can add this to your test job with featureset_override trying to find you example sec 10:14
marios|ruckTengu: like this https://docs.openstack.org/tripleo-docs/latest/ci/chasing_promotions.html#specifying-a-particular-hash 10:15
marios|ruckTengu: and just use dlrn_hash_tag: d416170694b13db3586554ba1809633210:15
Tenguah, good!10:15
marios|ruckTengu: should work at least those containers are there in the registry 10:15
Tengulemme update Chandan job.10:15
Tengumarios|ruck: thanks :). Job updated, let's see.10:16
marios|ruckack 10:17
* marios|ruck food biab10:33
jbadiapahi, Regarding this patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ansible/+/811474, could we increase the timeout of the tripleo_collectd molecute jobs to 1h30m?10:44
jbadiapaIt failed with a timeout, the timeout is 1h and the job is taking a 1h01m to complete10:45
jbadiapais there any reason to avoid the increase of the timeout? 10:46
jbadiapathe jobs https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/job/tripleo-ansible-centos-8-molecule-tripleo_collectd > https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/job/tripleo-ansible-centos-8-base (Timeout:    3600 seconds)10:49
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|afk11:00
Tengujbadiapa: why is it taking so long?11:02
jbadiapait's doing several tests at once11:02
Tengumaybe better to see if things could be split?11:03
jbadiapaI talked to chriss and suggested those two options. (splitting the molecule test or increasing the timeout)11:05
Tenguheh, of course, increasing timeout will be prefered - less work ;)11:05
*** rlandy|out is now known as rlandy|ruck11:08
jbadiapaI think so11:09
*** dviroel|out is now known as dviroel11:11
rlandy|ruckmarios|ruck: pojadhav|rover: how are things  in ruck/rover land?11:20
pojadhav|roverrlandy|ruck, just posted component line status in chat.. checking blockers.11:20
rlandy|ruckpojadhav|rover: k - let's sync when marios|ruck is back11:22
pojadhav|roveryep11:22
rlandy|ruckakahat: pojadhav|rover: also wanted to let you know what's happening with scenraio01011:22
pojadhav|roverack11:22
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: o/ same as yesterday nothing new afaik ... i am digging into containers/images periodics mirror issue can fill you in later 11:23
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: didn't get to the upgrade job yet because of ^^^ i think it has priority 11:23
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: we went ahead with non voting for now anyway to unblock ^ 11:23
rlandy|ruckmarios|ruck: ack - have not merged the integration criteria yet11:24
rlandy|ruckmarios|ruck: ack - you carry on ... you ok if I ping upgrades to see if they want to address this with the downgrade?11:26
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: sure np with me ;)11:26
rlandy|ruckjfrancoa: hello ... we have a ussuri/victoria promotion blocker ... https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/195332611:27
rlandy|ruckjfrancoa: ^^ can you review the comments on the bug above and advise regarding the suggested downgrade11:27
rlandy|ruckthese jobs are also blocking gate - so we are moving them to non-voting11:28
rlandy|ruckmarios|ruck: pojadhav|rover: btw: pinged infra re: stuck dlrn11:29
rlandy|ruckno victoria or wallaby builds in 4 days11:29
marios|ruckthanks rlandy|ruck 11:29
pojadhav|roverrlandy|ruck, ack11:31
dviroelmarios|ruck: morning o/ - do you remember any related issue while building containers?11:32
dviroelmarios|ruck: https://logserver.rdoproject.org/76/36976/4/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-standalone-master/c902241/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/container-builds/ad9f81ab-a385-4d85-b330-bf34311c8063/base/base-build.log.txt.gz11:32
dviroelmarios|ruck: this is showing up when running standalone-master + build_container_images: true11:33
marios|ruckdviroel: looking11:33
marios|ruckdviroel: not seen that ... not immediately clear what the error is here but no haven't seen something like that 11:34
dviroelmarios|ruck: ok, np - need to see the difference between build-containers and container-build roles11:36
dviroelsee if I can spot something11:36
Tenguuho.... https://logserver.rdoproject.org/98/36998/2/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-undercloud-containers-master/c2e410a/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/install_packages.sh.log.txt.gz11:42
Tenguseems cs9 line isn't in shape.11:43
Tenguhave to go, dog walk, but... meh.11:43
ysandeephey folks o/ anyone else facing issue with internal vpn?11:43
Tenguysandeep: nope (using Amsterdam)11:44
Tenguback in a bit.11:44
rlandy|ruckysandeep: ok by me11:44
rlandy|ruckusing Raleigh11:44
ysandeepTengu, rlandy|ruck thanks! 11:44
* ysandeep will try other vpns11:44
*** ysandeep|afk is now known as ysandeep11:46
akahatack11:46
ysandeepTengu, thanks Amsterdam worked for me11:47
owalshmarios|ruck: hey, if you have a minute just want to check I'm doing the right thing...11:48
marios|rucko/ owalsh 11:48
owalshwanted to get CI to cover https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-common/+/820408 so added depends-on for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/82051111:49
* akahat will be back in hour11:50
owalshbut doesn't seem to have worked. Is that the right ci change? And if yes should I just wait for it to merge (no Depends-On)11:51
rlandy|ruckakahat: will meet with pojadhav|rover - we can talk when you get back11:51
marios|ruckowalsh: looking11:52
marios|ruckowalsh: thinking (yeah i see it builds it at https://d7765034c2c5769142ff-d03ef6adfb032b4f673cb06ee5d0ab26.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/820511/1/check/tripleo-ci-centos-8-content-provider/9088da2/logs/report.html the ci one but skips it at tripleo-common https://37df2e11d5754f3dd19d-647e079c0cf961ec5006c71d86c2953a.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/820408/2/check/tripleo-ci-centos-8-content-provider/9ff9bdc/logs/report.html )11:53
marios|ruckowalsh: not sure about the details of our build-test-packages and building tripleo-ci i.e. if we can make that depends-on ci repo work in this way... so instead of digging there, you can just try run what you want with rdo testproject11:55
marios|ruckowalsh: are you familiar with that? 11:55
rlandy|ruckysandeep: fyi - dlrn is stuck on wallaby - so current  on rhos-17 is old11:55
marios|ruckowalsh: you can have both the tripleo-common and tripleo-ci change in depends-on ... but gimme sec let me dig a bit more at built-test-packages first 11:55
owalshmarios|ruck: ack, thanks!11:56
ysandeeprlandy|ruck, ack thanks for info11:56
marios|ruckowalsh: hmmm it isn't being included... i wonder if it doesn't like the changeid but that should work fine11:56
marios|ruckowalsh: i mean in https://37df2e11d5754f3dd19d-647e079c0cf961ec5006c71d86c2953a.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/820408/2/check/tripleo-ci-centos-8-content-provider/9ff9bdc/job-output.txt the 2021-12-06 11:05:43.650564 | primary |     "artg_change_list": [ only has 2021-12-06 11:05:43.650646 | primary |             "refspec": "refs/changes/08/820408/2"11:57
marios|ruckowalsh: normally it would also contain the tripleo-ci change there 11:57
marios|ruckowalsh: can you quickly try with 'normal' url in depends-on? 11:58
owalshmarios|ruck: just noticed there are 2 spaces between "Depends-On:" and the change id, wonder if that's the issue11:58
marios|ruckowalsh: maybe but also make it the 'normal' url not change id 11:58
owalshmarios|ruck: ack. thanks!11:59
marios|ruckowalsh: ack lets see hope it helps... 12:00
marios|ruckowalsh: you can check if it is included by grep artg_change_list as above in the job-output.txt ^^ 12:00
owalshmarios|ruck: ack, thanks as always12:13
rlandy|ruckpojadhav|rover: let's sync - https://meet.google.com/hje-vcyh-rru?pli=1&authuser=012:14
rlandy|ruckdviroel: hey ... re: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/37026 - not sure of arxcruz answered your questions12:15
rlandy|ruckbut we should get this patch in12:15
rlandy|ruckdviroel: ^^ can you take it over?12:15
dviroelrlandy|ruck: he didn't, not sure if we need to add DISK_FULL there, we can get this change in, and provide another one if needed?12:20
rlandy|ruckpojadhav|rover: https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-wallaby/report.html12:26
rlandy|ruckmarios|ruck: pojadhav|rover will report in the program call tomorrow12:28
bhagyashris_Tengu, frenzy_friday looks like the image/container with the sha 9f93da59213dc8e9f46a7a1e36936945 is getting archived from our source registry https://trunk.registry.rdoproject.org:8443/oapi/v1/namespaces/tripleomastercentos9/imagestreamtags12:29
bhagyashris_may be we will need fresh promotion for cs9 master 12:30
rlandy|ruckysandeep: steve put up patches for uefi on wallaby12:31
rlandy|ruckysandeep: they are on the review hackmd12:31
*** bhagyashris_ is now known as bhagyashris12:31
ysandeeprlandy|ruck: thanks, I saw your conversation on google channel with him, those patches are on my review list - will check them in next review round12:32
rlandy|ruckysandeep: thanks - no immediate ruch12:33
rlandy|ruckrush12:33
rlandy|ruckdviroel: wrt DISK_FULL jfrancoa was debugging some tests with that issue12:33
rlandy|ruckit is a failing status12:33
rlandy|ruckbut not a job failing status12:33
rlandy|ruckso good to track12:33
rlandy|ruckimho :)12:33
rlandy|ruckrcastillo: hey ... do you have the invite to the OSP all hands?12:34
dviroelrlandy|ruck: i see, so we should be good to merge arxcruz change12:38
bhagyashrisdviroel, yes i was also looking at the same code but it's bit confusing i will check later as soon as setup will go up at my side 12:39
rlandy|ruckdviroel: ysandeep: ok - so since arxcruz is out, there will not screenshot coming :)12:40
rlandy|ruckdviroel: ysandeep: if we're ok with the logic of the changes in https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/3702612:40
rlandy|ruckpls revote and we can merge and try it12:40
bhagyashrisrlandy|ruck, ysandeep jfyi i saw the results yesterday and that's looks good to mee12:40
rlandy|ruckbhagyashris: cool - pls vote there then12:41
bhagyashrisrlandy|ruck, yup12:41
ysandeeprlandy|ruck, lets merge that, without screenshot we don't have an easy way to confirm if anything wrong there.12:41
ysandeeprevoted +212:42
dviroelthanks bhagyashris 12:42
rlandy|ruckysandeep: dviroel: bhagyashris: ok - merging that .... bhagyashris pls keep an eye on the numbers12:42
rlandy|ruckif something looks wrong, pld submit a revert12:42
rlandy|ruckbhagyashris: ^^12:42
bhagyashrisrlandy|ruck, sure12:42
rlandy|ruckthank you!12:42
bhagyashrisfolks will need cs9 master promotion 12:44
*** pojadhav|rover is now known as pojadhav|rover|brb12:44
bhagyashrisbecause the current-tripleo hash https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos9-master/current-tripleo/delorean.repo.md5 containers archived from our source registry (if you see here https://trunk.registry.rdoproject.org:8443/oapi/v1/namespaces/tripleomastercentos9/imagestreamtags) and thats causing the issue while running the jobs in the testproject12:46
rlandy|ruckbhagyashris: marios|ruck: do you want to submit a patch to remove criteria12:49
rlandy|ruckand then revert 12:50
rlandy|ruckso you get a promotion?12:50
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: for u/v/upgrade? 12:50
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: i thought we had one already 12:50
rlandy|ruckmarios|ruck: nah - responding to bhagyashris's c9 comment12:50
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: or you mean somethign else ... ah master12:50
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: so we want empty criteria you mean? 12:50
marios|ruckpojadhav|rover|brb: can you do it... ah she is away 12:50
bhagyashrismarios|ruck, yeah for cs9 master12:50
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: k yeah doing12:51
rlandy|ruckmarios|ruck: talking c9 - ack thanks12:51
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: basically we want it empty right? 12:51
rlandy|ruckmarios|ruck: don't worry about the rest of ruck/roving pojadhav|rover|brb and I are on that12:51
rlandy|ruckmarios|ruck: yep12:51
rlandy|ruckand then revert when promoted12:51
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: hmmm... we probably want the containers push job though :D12:55
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: gonna update12:55
marios|ruckand images right12:56
rlandy|ruckwhatever can run now12:56
rlandy|ruckand spring current-tripleo12:56
marios|ruckhmmm but images and containers are waiting for fixes still in review/gate12:57
marios|ruckso won't update12:57
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: ^ 12:57
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: i mean the image/containers jobs are going to fail anyway so cant add hem 12:57
marios|ruckthem 12:57
rlandy|ruckmarios|ruck: bhagyashris: looks like we only have dviroel's topic at the community call ... let's chat bout c9 then12:58
marios|ruck k 12:58
rlandy|ruckand what we should do there12:58
bhagyashrisrlandy|ruck, ack12:59
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: fwiw... https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/36817/13#message-92e3f165909ebe0f5faeded43059d32b34796c69 12:59
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: mirror issue workaround not the tidiest thing in the world but gets us there... https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/820850 (plus we'll need https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/37067 but we have workaround for now 13:00
marios|ruckhttps://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/src/commit/7cade1571a78f4fa840c62fdecee620e1cf7392f/config/release/tripleo-ci/CentOS-9/promotion-testing-hash-master.yml#L54-L57 13:00
rlandy|ruckmarios|ruck: ok - whatever it takes at this point :)13:01
rlandy|ruckpojadhav|rover|brb: fyi ... reruns for failing master, wallaby, train https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/3625413:12
ysandeeprlandy|ruck, openstack-ansible-os_tempest xena branch is failing on our tripleo jobs: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/+/820821/13:13
ysandeeprlandy|ruck, ^^ they should just drop tripleo jobs for xena from layout, right?13:14
ysandeephttps://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/blob/stable/xena/zuul.d/project.yaml13:14
*** pojadhav|rover|brb is now known as pojadhav|rover13:14
rlandy|ruckysandeep: ack  - we don't have such a thing13:14
marios|rucko/ tripleo-ci please add to reviews list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/820850 we need this for c9 containers/images 13:14
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: ^^ 13:14
rlandy|ruckmarios|ruck: looks ok - waiting on zuul results to +213:16
pojadhav|roverrlandy|ruck, ack13:17
rlandy|ruckysandeep: marios|ruck: pojadhav|rover: just fyi ... wallaby and victoria dlrn are up to date now13:17
pojadhav|roverrlandy|ruck, great !!13:17
rlandy|ruckwe should see new code coming up now13:17
ysandeep++13:19
bhagyashrisarxcruz, sshnaidm, rlandy, rlandy|ruck, marios, ysandeep, bhagyashris, svyas, soniya29, pojadhav, akahat, chandankumar, frenzy_friday, anbanerj,  dviroel, rcastillo, dasm13:21
bhagyashrisTripleo CI community call in 9 mins13:21
bhagyashrisfeel free to add the topics here https://hackmd.io/MMg4WDbYSqOQUhU2Kj8zNg?both#2021-12-07-Community-Call **@ line 30**13:22
bhagyashrishello folks13:30
bhagyashriscommunity call time13:30
bhagyashrisakahat, pojadhav|rover sshnaidm 13:31
bhagyashris^13:31
rlandy|ruckhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/3706813:42
rlandy|ruckhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/36817/13#message-92e3f165909ebe0f5faeded43059d32b34796c6913:42
rlandy|ruckbhagyashris: ^^ pls watch if this hoses the promoter13:44
rlandy|ruckakahat: ^^13:44
marios|ruckDepends-On: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/82017213:47
marios|ruckDepends-On: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/82085013:47
Tengumarios|ruck: where did you find that hash earlier? jobs end in POST_FAILURE issue, apparently due to a package conflict or something.13:52
marios|ruckTengu: from the registry @ https://trunk.registry.rdoproject.org:8443/oapi/v1/namespaces/tripleomastercentos9/imagestreamtags/  14:00
marios|ruckTengu: (in community call right now)14:01
marios|ruckTengu: we are working on fixing the c9 promotion though should be sorted by later today anyway 14:01
Tengumarios|ruck: ok! tried to understand how that JSON works, it's... not really convenient, to be honest ;). but lemme know if I can help on the promotion issue :).14:01
marios|ruckTengu: click the 'raw data' (i guess you're using ff?)14:03
marios|ruckTengu: at least it is text you can search it14:03
Tenguah, I'll try that later then14:03
* bhagyashris dinner brb14:05
akahatrlandy|ruck, please +w https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/3706814:05
rlandy|ruckakahat: done14:07
rlandy|ruckjpodivin: matbu: looking at your criteria jobs14:07
rlandy|ruckthose jobs are not running in lines yet14:08
rlandy|ruckhttps://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?job_name=periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-containers-multinode-validation-master14:08
rlandy|rucklast run ^^ 11/0914:08
rlandy|ruckchecking line definitions14:08
jpodivinrlandy|ruck: is there something I should do to help them along? 14:09
rlandy|ruckhttps://github.com/rdo-infra/rdo-jobs/blob/master/zuul.d/component-pipeline-master.yaml14:10
rlandy|ruck        - periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-validation-master:14:11
rlandy|ruck            dependencies:14:11
rlandy|ruck              - periodic-tripleo-centos-8-master-component-validation-promote-consistent-to-component-ci-testing14:11
rlandy|ruck        - periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-validation-master:14:11
rlandy|ruck            dependencies:14:11
rlandy|ruck              - periodic-tripleo-centos-8-master-component-validation-promote-consistent-to-component-ci-testing14:11
rlandy|rucksame job defined twice14:11
rlandy|ruckhttps://github.com/rdo-infra/rdo-jobs/blob/master/zuul.d/component-pipeline-wallaby.yaml14:12
rlandy|ruckjpodivin: ^^ do you see those line definitions14:12
rlandy|ruckyou need to add the jobs you want to kick in those lines14:12
rlandy|ruckper component14:13
rlandy|ruckyour jobs are defined14:13
rlandy|ruckbut not defined to kick14:13
rlandy|ruckmatbu: jpodivin: ^^14:13
rlandy|ruckso before you add jobs to criteria, they have to be added to the lines14:13
rlandy|ruck        - periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-compute-wallaby-validation:14:14
rlandy|ruck            dependencies:14:14
rlandy|ruck              - periodic-tripleo-centos-8-wallaby-component-compute-promote-consistent-to-component-ci-testing14:14
rlandy|ruck        - periodic-tripleo-centos-8-wallaby-component-compute-promote-consistent-to-component-ci-testing14:14
rlandy|ruck^^ that one exists14:14
rlandy|ruckjpodivin: ^^ make sense?14:16
jpodivinrlandy|ruck: I understand that one is duplicated14:16
rlandy|ruckand the others are missing14:16
jpodivinrlandy|ruck: so, if I get this right, we should add all of the new jobs in the component-pipeline-* files. 14:17
jpodivinis that correct? 14:17
rlandy|ruckjpodivin: the compute one seems to be there14:18
rlandy|ruckjpodivin: but yeah - make sure the jobs are in the lines first14:18
rlandy|ruckand then add the criteria14:18
rlandy|ruckyour jobs have not run in a month14:18
jpodivinthat is embarrassing 14:19
rlandy|ruckjpodivin: hardly - we all do that - which is why I know to check for it :)14:20
jpodivinrlandy|ruck: ok, I'll get to patching14:25
jpodivinand thanks for the assist rlandy|ruck++ 14:25
akahatrlandy|ruck, marios|ruck o/ we need to revert this patch: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/37068 , we can't keep criteria empty.14:49
akahatthis broke promoter: http://promoter.rdoproject.org/promoter_logs/centos9_master.log14:50
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|lunch14:50
rlandy|ruckmarios|ruck is putting in a patch to add  just container builds14:51
rlandy|ruckwe can merge that14:51
akahatrlandy|ruck, or we can put only one job which is passing: eriodic-tripleo-ci-build-containers-centos-9-push-master14:51
akahatokay cool14:52
jpodivinrlandy|ruck: the pipeline patches are up https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/37071 I'm going to rebase the criteria patches on them, just to be sure. 14:55
jpodivinwell, add a depends on, to be more precise 14:57
rlandy|ruckrcastillo: hello15:09
rcastillorlandy|ruck: hi15:13
rlandy|ruckrcastillo: hey - just checking you have all the all hand meeting on your calendar15:14
rlandy|ruckrcastillo: also - pls see pvt15:14
rlandy|ruckdasm: ^^ sent you the link to the all hands15:15
rlandy|ruckin about 45 mins15:15
rcastillorlandy|ruck: I do15:15
rlandy|ruckrcastillo: k - good15:15
rlandy|rucknow at least we have you on the right lists and calendars15:16
dasmrlandy|ruck: ack. i didn't get the link, but i see the meeting in my calendar. 15:17
rlandy|ruckdasm: great - if you see that, you'll all set on the calendars15:19
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|dinner15:34
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: you joining el9? 15:46
rlandy|ruckakahat: marios|ruck; w+'ed https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/3707415:50
rlandy|ruckakahat: ^^ pls check for this when merged in promoter15:50
jbadiapais there a problem with zuul? 16:07
*** dviroel|lunch is now known as dviroel16:10
*** ysandeep|dinner is now known as ysandeep16:10
rlandy|ruckjbadiapa: which zuul?16:14
rlandy|ruckwe have three16:14
jbadiapahttps://zuul.opendev.org16:15
jbadiaparlandy|ruck16:15
rlandy|ruckhttps://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/status is spinning for me now16:16
rlandy|ruckService Unavailable16:17
rlandy|ruckprobably being restarted16:17
rlandy|ruckwill check back in a few16:17
rlandy|ruckjbadiapa: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/status - back16:26
jbadiapathx16:26
dviroelrlandy|ruck: http://promoter.rdoproject.org/promoter_logs/centos9_master.log16:27
rlandy|ruckdviroel: ack ... waiting for https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/37074 to be on promoter16:29
rlandy|ruckto add one job16:29
rlandy|ruckmerged a few minutes ago16:29
dviroeloh, good, didn't see this one16:30
ysandeeprlandy|ruck, do you have few mins, want to showcase node_holder.py new improvements 16:39
rlandy|ruckysandeep: not atm - can you book some time in my calendar?16:41
rlandy|ruckI know it's late for you16:41
rlandy|ruckso tomorrow is ok by me16:41
ysandeepack, thanks!16:42
marios|ruckrlandy|ruck: pojadhav|rover: going in a few need something before i do? 16:45
rlandy|ruckmarios|ruck: just checking if we have promoter config16:46
rlandy|ruckhmmm - not yet16:46
rlandy|ruckakahat: ^^ can you check that pull pls16:47
bhagyashrisrlandy|ruck, i see on the promoter server new change is not pulled yet16:47
rlandy|ruckbhagyashris: ack - I think that pull is every 10 minutes?16:48
bhagyashrisrlandy|ruck, probably16:48
bhagyashrislet wait for few mins16:49
bhagyashrisrlandy|ruck, now changes pulled on promoter server hope it will run successfully in the next run16:56
rlandy|ruckbhagyashris: thanks16:56
ysandeeprlandy|ruck, pojadhav|rover requested me to debug a ci failure in 16.2 https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/logs/22/295522/1/check/tripleo-rhel-8-buildimage-overcloud-full-rhos-16.2/6d745ca/job-output.txt 17:02
ysandeeprlandy|ruck, looks like its coming from because we are removing ansible 2.9 from release file: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/c/tripleo-environments/+/295717/2/config/release/rhos-17.yml#b113 17:03
ysandeepWe need to move ci code to 2.11, I didn't get why we are removing this from release file? 17:03
ysandeepafaik 8.4 is only be compatible with ansible2.917:03
rlandy|ruckysandeep: pojadhav-: k  then we still need it 17:06
*** marios|ruck is now known as marios|out17:06
rlandy|ruckshould have gotten an install but maybe not in time17:06
rlandy|rucklunch - brb17:06
akahatrlandy|ruck, checking..17:38
rlandy|ruckakahat: I think the promoter is busy promoting master c817:38
akahatrlandy|ruck, yup. we need to wait until it's done.17:39
rlandy|rucknew config is on there17:39
rlandy|ruckack17:39
ysandeeprlandy|ruck, fyi.. while working on fs064, we noticed the default nic-config file we use in CI had duplicate default routes on both external and ctlplane network: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ansible/+/818529/5#message-a44afc3ef6f8dd3471dc96f51389c697513f9552 , I will soon update that once my this patch get approved.18:06
rlandy|ruckk18:07
ysandeeprlandy|ruck, voted on steve patches: looks good18:12
ysandeepI think we can +w https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/82045918:13
ysandeepany objections ^^?18:15
* rlandy|ruck reviews the set18:16
ysandeeptht ones are already +w by Alex, that's the only one on us18:17
ysandeepWe need that as soon as tht patch merges18:17
rlandy|ruckhmmm ... we have no hash promoted18:18
rlandy|ruckysandeep: ack18:18
ysandeepiiuc... Apart from downstream baremetal i think we will be good with these changes, we might need some changes for baremetal.18:19
rlandy|ruckysandeep: w+'ed it18:19
ysandeepthanks!18:20
rlandy|ruckcurrent-tripleo/2021-11-15 14:47 18:20
rlandy|ruckno master c9 promotion18:20
ysandeeprlandy|ruck, ^^ need help figuring that out?18:21
akahatc8 train promoting: http://promoter.rdoproject.org/promoter_logs/centos8_train.log18:22
rlandy|ruckysandeep: no promoter is busy wth train18:22
rlandy|ruckakahat: ack - just saw that18:22
ysandeepokay, great!18:22
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|out18:23
* ysandeep|out out for the day, see you tomorrow o/18:23
rlandy|ruckenqueued wallaby18:31
akahatrlandy|ruck, no such manifest: trunk.registry.rdoproject.org/tripleomastercentos9/openstack-ceilometer-central:9d27ee6e0e4f5143dbc49d4c775c9cd518:36
akahathttp://promoter.rdoproject.org/promoter_logs/centos9_master.log18:36
rlandy|ruck2021-12-07 18:41:49,384 4036246 ERROR    promoter Containers promote 'aggregate: 9d27ee6e0e4f5143dbc49d4c775c9cd5, commit: dae65ca8df725cf989cf70f142d07efd5ce3cc0f, distro: 0385a1c2f9486db83a8b1d3cbeabfd6da81e77ef, extended: None, component: validation, timestamp: 1638878898' to current-tripleo: Failed promotion18:45
rlandy|ruckakahat: probably the containers were pruned from rdo registry18:46
rlandy|ruckakahat: are containers with that hash on rdo registry?18:56
akahatrlandy|ruck, no. those are not there.19:07
dviroelhttps://logserver.rdoproject.org/67/36267/37/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-build-containers-centos-9-push-master/cdcd5d6/job-output.txt19:10
dviroelfull_hash: 9d27ee6e0e4f5143dbc49d4c775c9cd519:11
dviroelshould be pushing, right?19:11
dviroel2021-12-07 16:48:33.337183 | TASK [build-containers : Get contents of openstack repo baseurl for the version hash]19:17
dviroel2021-12-07 11:48:33.761993 | primary | 6c06225cee172f4363b713b9d2c76d8019:17
akahatsame hash is getting pushed every time? ^^19:23
marios|outdviroel: looks like issue comes from there https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/src/branch/master/roles/build-containers/tasks/main.yaml#L2119:23
marios|outdviroel: not sure whats going on i will dig more in my morning 19:23
akahat"name": "openstack-aodh-api:6c06225cee172f4363b713b9d2c76d80", ...  "creationTimestamp": "2021-12-07T16:59:43Z"19:23
marios|outit fetches the hash from the openstack_repo_name (delorean.repo) - i think that task is wrong/needs update19:23
dviroelmarios|out: yeah, i'm taking a look there atm19:24
marios|outdviroel: thanks please add me if you post any reviews etc 19:24
dviroelmarios|out: will do, tks, have a good night ;)19:24
marios|outdviroel: maybe we just need to set buildcontainers_version_hash ? not sure i'm reading teh play correctly 19:26
marios|outdviroel: thanks... am watching bob young interview not really working now ;)19:27
dviroelmarios|out: ack, comparing with centos-8 one too, to see if this is the flow19:28
marios|outthanks dviroel have a good one o/19:29
dviroelo/19:29
rlandy|ruckdviroel: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/820850 - ok to w+?19:59
dviroelrlandy|ruck: yes, you can W+20:01
rlandy|ruckdviroel: that patch will fail check20:06
rlandy|rucksome timed out jobs20:06
rlandy|ruck2021-12-07 17:37:38.285 | ERROR:root:overcloud-base has no valid mapping for package lvm220:09
rlandy|ruckdviroel: ^^ legit errors here20:09
dviroelack20:15
dviroelrlandy|ruck: lets hold marios patch for now,  I'll amend it with a tentative to provide the correct hash to build-containers role20:52
rlandy|ruckdviroel: thanks20:54
rlandy|ruckprogram doc is updated22:26
rlandy|ruckdviroel: hmm ... we've got broken promoter now23:34
rlandy|ruckhttp://promoter.rdoproject.org/promoter_logs/centos8_train.log23:34
rlandy|ruckbuild-containers role broken everywhere then23:35
rlandy|rucktrunk.registry.rdoproject.org/tripleotraincentos8/centos-binary-heat-api-cfn:79f67d27b580343cdbb196999362461f23:35
dviroelhum, weird23:50
rlandy|ruckdviroel: maybe it's only train23:58
dviroelrlandy|ruck: ack, maybe some artifact is missing23:58
rlandy|ruckdviroel: left marios, pooja, amol, 23:58
rlandy|ruckthey can review tomorrow23:58
dviroelrlandy|ruck: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/36817/13#message-e7a07ee1d812b52a515f02c166d52b2eac52b1c823:58
dviroel^ now it is pushing to the correct hash23:59
rlandy|ruckcool23:59
rlandy|ruckdviroel: late for you23:59
rlandy|ruckdviroel: see you tomorrow23:59
dviroelrlandy|ruck: see you o/23:59

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!