| *** pojadhav|out is now known as pojadhav|ruck | 02:57 | |
| *** ysandeep|out is now known as ysandeep | 04:16 | |
| *** ykarel|away is now known as ykarel | 05:04 | |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|brb | 05:52 | |
| *** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 06:25 | |
| *** ysandeep|brb is now known as ysandeep | 06:41 | |
| *** abregman is now known as abregman|pto | 06:58 | |
| ysandeep | ykarel: On c9 config-drive is not attached to nodepool node: https://logserver.rdoproject.org/29/35229/29/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-standalone-master/fbe7285/logs/undercloud/var/log/extra/disk.txt | 07:29 |
|---|---|---|
| ysandeep | do you know what we need to do to attach config-drive on c9? | 07:30 |
| ysandeep | may be something similiar to: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/7267/1/nodepool/nodepool.yaml | 07:31 |
| chandankumar | ysandeep: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/status#815472 seems to be stuck in zuul queue, Do we want to abandon and restore? | 07:56 |
| chandankumar | It will affect the chain | 07:56 |
| ysandeep | chandankumar, i think not only gate but some check jobs are also stuck | 07:57 |
| ysandeep | for ex: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/status#813930 | 07:58 |
| ysandeep | Let me check with infra.. | 07:58 |
| ysandeep | chandankumar, pinged on #opendev.. lets see | 08:01 |
| chandankumar | ysandeep: thanks :-) | 08:01 |
| chandankumar | akahat: bhagyashris ysandeep: pojadhav|ruck please have a look at this chain https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22cleanup-excludelist%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) I hope it does not break promoter | 08:04 |
| chandankumar | and downstream | 08:04 |
| pojadhav|ruck | chandankumar, ack | 08:05 |
| * pojadhav|ruck lunch | 08:07 | |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|lunch | 08:08 | |
| ysandeep|lunch | chandankumar, ack | 08:08 |
| ykarel | ysandeep|lunch, i think it should be already enabled | 08:10 |
| ykarel | but yes for that changes are needed in nodepool config | 08:10 |
| chandankumar | ysandeep|lunch: I am going to start working on cs9 containers multinode job | 08:30 |
| *** dpawlik3 is now known as dpawlik | 08:34 | |
| arxcruz | chandankumar: hey man, do we have centos 9 jobs running for promotion and/or integration ? | 08:47 |
| chandankumar | arxcruz: yes, few jobs, https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?pipeline=openstack-periodic-integration-main-cs9 | 08:47 |
| chandankumar | we will be adding more by this week | 08:48 |
| marios | chandankumar: ysandeep|lunch: fyi https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/36457 WIP Adds entry for centos9 rdo_baremetal_image | 08:54 |
| marios | amoralej: ykarel: how can we help/do with getting a 9 image into https://rhos-d.infra.prod.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/dashboard/project/images ... i mean apart from waiting for the image to be released ;) | 08:54 |
| marios | amoralej: ykarel: need it for centos9 fs1 ovb job - patch there https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/36457 but we don't have the image yet | 08:55 |
| marios | chandankumar: amoralej: ykarel: maybe i can try downloading from https://cloud.centos.org/centos/9-stream/x86_64/images/CentOS-Stream-GenericCloud-9-20211020.0.x86_64.qcow2 and uploading there? ^^ | 08:56 |
| amoralej | marios, in which tenant | 08:56 |
| marios | amoralej: rhos-dev-ci | 08:56 |
| amoralej | yes, you can just push that | 08:56 |
| marios | amoralej: ack thanks doing | 08:57 |
| marios | amoralej: sorry for noise :) | 08:57 |
| amoralej | no problem | 08:57 |
| *** ykarel is now known as ykarel|lunch | 09:05 | |
| *** ysandeep|lunch is now known as ysandeep | 09:19 | |
| ysandeep | chandankumar, I didn't heard anything back from infra, may be no one available in this timezone.. I am going to abandon/restore to clear gate | 09:22 |
| ysandeep | ykarel|lunch, https://softwarefactory-project.io/r/gitweb?p=config.git;a=blob;f=nodepool/static_config/nodepool-builder.yaml#l236 | 09:31 |
| ysandeep | ykarel|lunch, i think it should be already enabled >> I don't find /mt/config in output: https://logserver.rdoproject.org/29/35229/29/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-standalone-master/fbe7285/logs/undercloud/var/log/extra/disk.txt even though is see "config-drive: true" at ^^ , may be its missing at somewhere else | 09:34 |
| soniya29 | chandankumar, arxcruz, kopecmartin, ysandeep, please add/edit the today's agenda for tempest meeting - https://hackmd.io/fIOKlEBHQfeTZjZmrUaEYQ | 09:50 |
| *** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel | 10:19 | |
| ykarel | ysandeep, there it will be seen only if it's mounted | 10:21 |
| ykarel | if for some reason it's not mounted it will not be seen | 10:21 |
| *** rlandy is now known as rlandy|ruck | 10:33 | |
| rlandy|ruck | akahat: hi - around today? | 10:38 |
| ysandeep | ykarel: ack, thanks! | 10:38 |
| rlandy|ruck | matbu: jpodivin: should we sync later re: all the validations patches? | 10:42 |
| jbadiapa | ysandeep, were you able to take a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1948001 ? | 10:43 |
| rlandy|ruck | ysandeep: pojadhav|ruck: when dviroel|rover|afk gets in, let's ync about downstream | 10:43 |
| rlandy|ruck | and who's following up on what there | 10:43 |
| matbu | rlandy|ruck: o/ i have a small etherpad to sumurize: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/vf-component-ci | 10:43 |
| chandankumar | ysandeep: marios fyi if you get hit by this cs9 bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1944594 | 10:43 |
| ysandeep | rlandy|ruck, did you heard anything from mhu / kforde after I left? | 10:44 |
| rlandy|ruck | matbu: ok - so I have some open time on Friday morning if you guys need to sync about design | 10:44 |
| rlandy|ruck | otherwise you can just pass chandankumar and me your patches for review | 10:44 |
| pojadhav|ruck | rlandy|ruck, ack | 10:44 |
| matbu | rlandy|ruck: mainly we need to land the tqe patch 815292 and then the rdo-jobs will come after | 10:44 |
| rlandy|ruck | ysandeep: nothing helpful | 10:44 |
| rlandy|ruck | matbu: k- chandankumar and I will look at that patch shortly | 10:45 |
| matbu | rlandy|ruck: ack thx, for the rdo-job, i'm not sure about the approach to override overcloud_roles like this here: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/36232/34/zuul.d/component-jobs-master.yaml#378 | 10:45 |
| matbu | rlandy|ruck: so your expertise (and chandankumar ) will be needed on that one | 10:46 |
| ysandeep | jbadiapa: Sorry not yet.. I got occupied with C9 work.. I will take a look tomorrow's morning. Is that a blocker for you.. i recall you mentioned with whole_disk=false you were able to passed that step. | 10:46 |
| matbu | rlandy|ruck: but we can sync on friday +1 | 10:46 |
| *** marios is now known as marios|afk | 10:47 | |
| rlandy|ruck | matbu: k - booking a time - we can use it or not | 10:47 |
| jbadiapa | yes it's not a problem for me. I updated the launchpad... | 10:52 |
| jbadiapa | ysandeep^^ | 10:53 |
| * pojadhav|ruck brb | 10:54 | |
| ysandeep | jbadiapa: okay , thanks! | 10:54 |
| chandankumar | soniya29: please update this patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-tempest-skiplist/+/814903 when , free thansk! | 10:56 |
| matbu | rlandy|ruck: ok, we can also see with chandankumar or ysandeep , i dont want to waste your time on your work, i know you have a lot of to do | 10:58 |
| matbu | s/see/chat/ (see if more a french translation :D) | 10:58 |
| rlandy|ruck | either way | 10:58 |
| rlandy|ruck | been working with jpodivin on these | 10:58 |
| chandankumar | ysandeep: marios|afk bhagyashris pojadhav|ruck any review needs attension | 11:00 |
| rlandy|ruck | frenzy_friday: ^^ arxcruz: ^^? | 11:00 |
| rlandy|ruck | reviews we need to look at??? | 11:00 |
| bhagyashris | chandankumar, not from side side | 11:02 |
| frenzy_friday | rlandy|ruck, no all wf ed for me | 11:02 |
| pojadhav|ruck | chandankumar, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-tempest-skiplist/+/814855 | 11:02 |
| chandankumar | pojadhav|ruck: in my list, will go over that | 11:02 |
| rlandy|ruck | frenzy_friday; cool - let's get your review in on CIX card server today | 11:02 |
| pojadhav|ruck | chandankumar, thank you! | 11:03 |
| arxcruz | rlandy|ruck: just https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/36458 for now, but not critical, I'm working on the dashboard for centos 9 | 11:03 |
| rlandy|ruck | arxcruz: thanks - also the update/upgrades patch | 11:06 |
| rlandy|ruck | is marios|afk ok with that one now? | 11:06 |
| arxcruz | rlandy|ruck: i did the updates he asked, waiting for the results | 11:10 |
| soniya29 | chandankumar, sure | 11:11 |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|afk | 11:13 | |
| *** dviroel|rover|afk is now known as dviroel|rover | 11:15 | |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck pojadhav|ruck hi o/ - lets wait pooja finish her lunch | 11:18 |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: pojadhav|ruck: yep - will ruck/rover sync in about 20 mins | 11:19 |
| pojadhav|ruck | rlandy|ruck, dviroel|rover : I am available :) | 11:19 |
| pojadhav|ruck | rlandy|ruck, ack | 11:19 |
| *** marios|afk is now known as marios | 11:21 | |
| marios | rlandy|ruck: arxcruz: k i will check again didn't realise it was updated | 11:22 |
| jpodivin | matbu: we have talked about the https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/815292 yesterday | 11:28 |
| jpodivin | matbu: it's clashing with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/814801 and it doesn't allow for overrides on the job level | 11:29 |
| matbu | jpodivin: i dont think it's a problem for standalone jobs -> standalone play , ovb -> ovb play & so on | 11:31 |
| jpodivin | matbu: we are not talking standalone jobs now. | 11:31 |
| matbu | jpodivin: i tested the standalone playbook change in a testproject run | 11:31 |
| matbu | jpodivin: same for multinode, the inventory is selected per play | 11:31 |
| chandankumar | pojadhav|ruck: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-tempest-skiplist/+/814855/6/roles/validate-tempest/vars/tempest_skip.yml#b1480 please keep this test | 11:31 |
| chandankumar | then we can merge that | 11:31 |
| marios | arxcruz: rlandy|ruck: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/813629/9#message-f407eb6b32f6c749be016c21e7fea1812c71d66e | 11:38 |
| rlandy|ruck | ysandeep|afk: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/815456/3/roles/build-containers/vars/main.yaml - will this mess with 16.2? | 11:38 |
| rlandy|ruck | if not, we can merge | 11:38 |
| jpodivin | matbu: we can't merge both. And in this case we need to select inventory that might be in the config donwload dir, which wouldn't work with your patch. | 11:40 |
| jpodivin | matbu: we should stick with per job selection, we are already doing that with component variable afterall | 11:41 |
| dviroel|rover | marios: sshnaidm hi o/, LP created https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1948931 | 11:42 |
| dviroel|rover | marios: sshnaidm an alternative is to revert https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/812672 | 11:43 |
| marios | dviroel|rover: thanks ... related to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/815493 i guess | 11:43 |
| dviroel|rover | marios: yes sir | 11:43 |
| matbu | jpodivin: yep the inventory not in overcloud-deploy/overcloud is weird. Did you have this 100% of the time in your job ? | 11:43 |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: pojadhav|ruck: ysandeep|afk: fyi - we're going to merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/806284/ | 11:44 |
| rlandy|ruck | may break stuff :) | 11:44 |
| matbu | jpodivin: because I never seen that before | 11:44 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: ack | 11:44 |
| jpodivin | matbu: I did, the latest test project execution of your patch is actually failing on that as well . | 11:44 |
| jpodivin | if it gets the right inventory it will at least execute validation, it might fail on authentication (that's hitting compute comp now in my branch) but it will find the host and run it. | 11:45 |
| arxcruz | marios: i don't know the answer... i believe it will not matter, because it will have a previous hash, plus the actual hash right ? | 11:45 |
| arxcruz | in that case, it will also remain the same | 11:45 |
| sshnaidm | rlandy|ruck, worth to check it on ovb job with a real patch, it will be executed there | 11:46 |
| matbu | jpodivin: no the inventory is in the correct place: https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/build/9d18d1c7cd6e49f8ac68d6fc18a1aa70/log/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/overcloud-deploy/overcloud/tripleo-ansible-inventory.yaml.txt.gz | 11:46 |
| jpodivin | matbu: doesn't have nova_api | 11:46 |
| jpodivin | without the validation won't execute. | 11:47 |
| matbu | jpodivin: yep true no nova_api but the inventory path is correct | 11:47 |
| jpodivin | matbu: "no host matched" | 11:48 |
| matbu | jpodivin: the nova_api might be a setting with the job itself | 11:48 |
| matbu | jpodivin: about the tqe review the path should be correct in all cases for master & wallaby , according the tripleoclient code | 11:48 |
| jpodivin | yes if nothing changes | 11:49 |
| jpodivin | which is why I would go for something more adjustable | 11:49 |
| jpodivin | like ... per job override | 11:49 |
| jpodivin | anyway, I have running validation and tripleo component multinode. The compute is now stuck on the authentication error. | 11:50 |
| matbu | jpodivin: we can override the full path as well .. but then it's not a big deal, if it's change we will changed it. But the path of the inventory has been decided during the last ptg, so i dont think it's a big pb for now | 11:51 |
| jpodivin | matbu: then why are you introducing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/815292 when https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/814801 does the trick? | 11:52 |
| matbu | jpodivin: i think we have good progress here. Im more interest by the overcloud_roles overrides, if it's ok or not to do that. If so thats nice .. if not we will see if adding a validation featureset is sane | 11:52 |
| matbu | jpodivin: i want to standardize the call of the playbook for the 3 playbooks that we need: multinode/ovb/standalone | 11:53 |
| jpodivin | why do we need ovb again? The multinode job with 010 works fine | 11:53 |
| *** ysandeep|afk is now known as ysandeep | 11:54 | |
| jpodivin | it's actually a fair bit faster too. | 11:54 |
| jpodivin | we definitely don't need ovb for validations and for the ooo tests. | 11:54 |
| matbu | jpodivin: another way which be can better for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/814801/6/playbooks/validations.yml will be to make a var like {{ validation_inventory }} and do the job.inventory override per playbook | 11:54 |
| matbu | jpodivin: no we need ovb for components | 11:55 |
| jpodivin | matbu: why? It's working without it. | 11:55 |
| jpodivin | matbu: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/36000 | 11:56 |
| matbu | jpodivin: to me this is the oooq playbook which choose which inventory should be use because it's related to the deployment. It's a playbook var | 11:58 |
| rlandy|ruck | pojadhav|ruck: dviroel|rover: sorry - let's meet after we drop from program call | 11:58 |
| rlandy|ruck | pojadhav|ruck: dviroel|rover: we have some stuff to work on internally | 11:58 |
| rlandy|ruck | that needs action | 11:59 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: ok | 11:59 |
| jpodivin | matbu: we are supplying our own inventory on the command line since the functional tests were implemented. It doesn't necessarily have to be the same one every time. | 11:59 |
| pojadhav|ruck | rlandy|ruck, ok | 11:59 |
| jpodivin | the only difference is that now we can set that from rdo job, rather than figuring it out with conditional on the quickstart side. If there is an need to overrided it, it's still possible to do on within the quickstart | 12:00 |
| soniya29 | chandankumar, kopecmartin, ysandeep, rlandy|ruck, arxcruz, tempest meeting? | 12:01 |
| *** ykarel_ is now known as ykarel | 12:01 | |
| rlandy|ruck | soniya29: on program call | 12:01 |
| soniya29 | rlandy|ruck, ack | 12:01 |
| dviroel|rover | pojadhav|ruck: rlandy|ruck I can talk today | 12:01 |
| pojadhav|ruck | dviroel|rover, ack :) | 12:02 |
| frenzy_friday | hey ysandeep, the testproject for https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/36427 is passing. Can I start adding the c9 scenario jobs? | 12:06 |
| ysandeep | frenzy_friday, sure.. you may want to add depends-on: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/815472 | 12:07 |
| frenzy_friday | cool, thanks | 12:09 |
| frenzy_friday | Hey ysandeep , chandankumar : I should add the periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-scenario00X-standalone-master jobs should in standalone-jobs.yaml right? And not in integration-jobs-c9-master.yaml? | 12:19 |
| chandankumar | frenzy_friday: the job should be defined here integration-jobs-cs9-master.yaml | 12:21 |
| chandankumar | for each release related integration job, we are keeping it in a seperate file | 12:22 |
| bhagyashris | rlandy|ruck, chandankumar ysandeep plz let me know when you have free time will meet for sec to decide the coming reto and planning meeting date | 12:22 |
| ysandeep | I am free to chat now | 12:23 |
| matbu | jpodivin: but looking at your rdo-job review, i have no religion :D, i prefer at the playbook level, but since you put a lot of var in the job def, if it's ok for everyone, then got for it. I'm putting one another comment in the tqe patch | 12:23 |
| bhagyashris | as coming week is the Diwali festive week so most of the folks from India will be out | 12:24 |
| rlandy|ruck | bhagyashris: ysandeep: chandankumar: yep - let's keep the retro on Wed and move planning to monday | 12:24 |
| rlandy|ruck | although | 12:24 |
| bhagyashris | rlandy|ruck, monday means 8th Nov right? | 12:25 |
| bhagyashris | rlandy|ruck, we can also do one thing club the retro and planning meeting on Monday wdyt? | 12:25 |
| rlandy|ruck | bhagyashris: ysandeep: chandankumar: yes ... otherwise we will have just marios, dviroel|rover, arxcruz and frenzy_friday on planning | 12:25 |
| bhagyashris | ysandeep, chandankumar ^ | 12:26 |
| rlandy|ruck | bhagyashris: we will have people on wed | 12:26 |
| chandankumar | bhagyashris: ysandeep is not around next week | 12:26 |
| rlandy|ruck | bhagyashris: chandankumar: ysandeep: ugh - we have prod chain virt meet up | 12:26 |
| rlandy|ruck | chandankumar: bhagyashris: ysandeep: ok - let's meet in 5 mins | 12:27 |
| chandankumar | ok | 12:27 |
| rlandy|ruck | just getting off program call | 12:27 |
| bhagyashris | rlandy|ruck, ok | 12:27 |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: pojadhav|ruck: dropping from program call - just fyi | 12:27 |
| bhagyashris | rlandy|ruck, chandankumar https://meet.google.com/zvw-hnds-ncu?authuser=0 | 12:28 |
| pojadhav|ruck | rlandy|ruck, yup | 12:29 |
| dviroel|rover | ok, np | 12:29 |
| * dviroel|rover ☕ | 12:36 | |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 12:39 | |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: pojadhav|ruck: pls join https://meet.google.com/zvw-hnds-ncu?authuser=0 | 12:39 |
| bhagyashris | folks plz Note: next planning meeting will be on 8th Nov (Monday) 12:00 PM UTC to 2:0 PM UTC | 12:52 |
| marios | ack bhagyashris will you send/update the calendar invite please? | 12:52 |
| bhagyashris | marios, yes sent | 12:53 |
| marios | bhagyashris: thanks | 13:00 |
| soniya29 | rlandy|ruck, meeting? | 13:01 |
| rlandy|ruck | soniya29: few minutes | 13:01 |
| soniya29 | rlandy|ruck: okay | 13:01 |
| *** jpena|off is now known as jpena | 13:04 | |
| rlandy|ruck | https://trello.com/c/tx4SwUQp/2109-cixlp1895248tripleociproa-master-loadbalancerscenariotesttestloadbalanceripv4crud-showloadbalancer-provisioningstatus-updated-to | 13:11 |
| rlandy|ruck | https://trello.com/c/PQgy05Ai/1906-cixlp1923194tripleociproa-master-promotion-tempestscenariotestminimumbasictestminimumbasicscenariotestminimumbasicscenario-is-fa | 13:12 |
| rlandy|ruck | https://trello.com/c/3E1g5aj1/2200-cixlp1914600tripleociproa-periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario010-ovn-provider-standalone-master-victoria-ussuri-is-failing-on | 13:12 |
| rlandy|ruck | https://trello.com/c/VwqIeeGH/2084-cixbz2002639osp17rhel8osp17-ipv6-ceph-job-is-failing-on-task-run-cephadm-bootstrap-with-stderr-error-einval-failed-to-connect-to | 13:12 |
| rlandy|ruck | pojadhav|ruck: dviroel|rover: ^^ | 13:13 |
| rlandy|ruck | soniya29: sorry - joining | 13:13 |
| *** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 13:14 | |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1948931 | 13:14 |
| dviroel|rover | pojadhav|ruck: ^ | 13:15 |
| dviroel|rover | marked as promotion-blocker, since affects tripleo component line | 13:15 |
| dviroel|rover | we can revert a change that fix that | 13:15 |
| dviroel|rover | or, go with the fix here https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/815493 | 13:15 |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: is the train introspection change merged? | 13:47 |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: does https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/815493 work? | 13:52 |
| rlandy|ruck | if so, what's stopping us going with it? | 13:52 |
| dviroel|rover | lets start with the first issue | 13:53 |
| dviroel|rover | https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1948931 | 13:53 |
| dviroel|rover | this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/815493 works | 13:54 |
| dviroel|rover | tested here https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/36374/4#message-f208d53dd1fb3ad526aa3930e75fd11ee2dcd1f1 | 13:54 |
| dviroel|rover | I think we can merge this ^ and will follow up in yum-config wire up (master and other stables) if there is a way of avoiding this workarounds ^ | 13:55 |
| dviroel|rover | OR | 13:57 |
| dviroel|rover | we revert this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/812672 | 13:57 |
| dviroel|rover | then I'll need to find a better solution in 'repo-setup' role | 13:58 |
| pojadhav|ruck | rlandy|ruck, dviroel|rover, chandankumar, ysandeep : I kept patches ready at downstream https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/q/topic:%22osp_trunk_https%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) | 13:58 |
| *** kopecmartin is now known as kopecmartin|pto | 14:00 | |
| dviroel|rover | pojadhav|ruck: ack, tks | 14:00 |
| ysandeep | pojadhav|ruck: thanks! i will take a look at them tomorrow | 14:00 |
| ysandeep | pojadhav|ruck, don't touch other repos.. only update our repos.. tripleo-environment, tripleo-ci-internal-jobs and tripleo-ci-internal-config | 14:02 |
| pojadhav|ruck | ysandeep, ack will abandon rest of the patches. | 14:04 |
| ysandeep | pojadhav|ruck: thanks! | 14:04 |
| chandankumar | pojadhav|ruck: thanks, will take a look | 14:15 |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|out | 14:17 | |
| chandankumar | rlandy|ruck: merging rbac jobs https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-jobs/+/36121 | 14:18 |
| rlandy|ruck | chandankumar: yay - thank you | 14:24 |
| rlandy|ruck | soniya29: ^^ | 14:24 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: fyi https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1947403/comments/17 (introspection timeout) | 14:32 |
| chandankumar | arxcruz: hello, we also need to enable cs9 containers copy from rdo trunk registry to quay | 14:32 |
| arxcruz | chandankumar: ok | 14:32 |
| rlandy|ruck | thank you | 14:33 |
| rlandy|ruck | pojadhav|ruck: chandankumar: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-tempest-skiplist/+/814855 - merging this ... | 14:49 |
| rlandy|ruck | https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/36390 | 14:49 |
| pojadhav|ruck | rlandy|ruck, ack | 14:50 |
| chandankumar | rlandy|ruck: aye | 14:53 |
| * dviroel|rover lunch, brb | 14:55 | |
| pojadhav|ruck | rlandy|ruck, anything you want me to look at..? | 14:59 |
| rlandy|ruck | pojadhav|ruck: https://trello.com/c/VwqIeeGH/2084-cixbz2002639osp17rhel8osp17-ipv6-ceph-job-is-failing-on-task-run-cephadm-bootstrap-with-stderr-error-einval-failed-to-connect-to | 15:00 |
| rlandy|ruck | pls check status there and if it's still valid | 15:00 |
| rlandy|ruck | pojadhav|ruck: and start patches for https | 15:00 |
| rlandy|ruck | thanks | 15:00 |
| pojadhav|ruck | rlandy|ruck, https patches ready | 15:00 |
| *** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away | 15:00 | |
| rlandy|ruck | pojadhav|ruck: ah - thanks - looking | 15:01 |
| pojadhav|ruck | rlandy|ruck, https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/q/topic:%22osp_trunk_https%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) | 15:01 |
| rlandy|ruck | pojadhav|ruck: tomorrow - if infra is fixed, pls look at the downstream component jobs | 15:01 |
| rlandy|ruck | and see where we are with those | 15:01 |
| pojadhav|ruck | rlandy|ruck, sure | 15:02 |
| rlandy|ruck | pojadhav|ruck: you can also look at the other skiplist CIXs | 15:02 |
| rlandy|ruck | and revert the list and see if the problem remains | 15:02 |
| pojadhav|ruck | rlandy|ruck, yeah will look into it. | 15:02 |
| chandankumar | rlandy|ruck: Do we have the order to review validation stuff? | 15:09 |
| rlandy|ruck | chandankumar: just w+ed one patch | 15:10 |
| rlandy|ruck | chandankumar: understanding is that jpodivin and matbu are working out their changes - we have a meeting on friday to help merge their stuff | 15:11 |
| rlandy|ruck | reading back | 15:11 |
| chandankumar | ok | 15:11 |
| rlandy|ruck | sshnaidm: hey - what was this in connection to? <sshnaidm> rlandy|ruck, worth to check it on ovb job with a real patch, it will be executed there | 15:12 |
| * rlandy|ruck lose track :) | 15:12 | |
| sshnaidm | rlandy|ruck, was about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/806284/ but it's +w, so nvrmnd :D | 15:13 |
| rlandy|ruck | sshnaidm: it just failed gate | 15:14 |
| rlandy|ruck | so you're in luck | 15:14 |
| rlandy|ruck | sshnaidm: RDO third party OVB did run | 15:15 |
| rlandy|ruck | tripleo-ci-centos-8-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-victoria-branch https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/build/bed630d0040b4802adabe3560b5cf669 : SUCCESS in 3h 04m 02s (non-voting) | 15:15 |
| rlandy|ruck | tripleo-ci-centos-8-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/build/14c7fffc71cf4c4da7867175a0e70dd4 : SUCCESS in 2h 07m 08s | 15:15 |
| sshnaidm | rlandy|ruck, but w/o a real patch, this code wasn't executed | 15:15 |
| sshnaidm | rlandy|ruck, lemme submit a test.. | 15:15 |
| rlandy|ruck | sshnaidm: yeah - good point | 15:15 |
| * rlandy|ruck will remove workflow | 15:15 | |
| rlandy|ruck | and you can try | 15:15 |
| *** pojadhav|ruck is now known as pojadhav|out | 15:23 | |
| chandankumar | marios: rlandy|ruck overcloud deployment works fine container-multinode https://logserver.rdoproject.org/26/34926/5/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-containers-multinode-master/79c195d/job-output.txt | 15:24 |
| chandankumar | few tempest failures | 15:24 |
| rlandy|ruck | very cool | 15:24 |
| marios | chandankumar: nice one :) | 15:30 |
| marios | chandankumar: still fighting fs1 :/ | 15:30 |
| marios | chandankumar: thanks for help merging https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/36457 | 15:31 |
| chandankumar | marios: need one help, where we can put this value https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/815472/3/roles/standalone/templates/standalone_config.yaml.j2 for overcloud deploy? | 15:31 |
| marios | chandankumar: any of the env files used in that job | 15:31 |
| marios | chandankumar: tripleo-heat-templates | 15:31 |
| marios | chandankumar: must be using one of the files under ci/environments there | 15:32 |
| chandankumar | marios: but it will enable for all c8 and c9 both | 15:32 |
| chandankumar | that we donot want to do that | 15:32 |
| marios | chandankumar: well we may need to have different env files and wire the jobs differently | 15:32 |
| chandankumar | Let me go via https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/src/branch/master/roles/overcloud-deploy/templates/config-download.yaml.j2#L11 | 15:32 |
| marios | chandankumar: maybe we can chat about that tomorrow mornign ? | 15:32 |
| marios | chandankumar: ack | 15:32 |
| chandankumar | marios: yes sure, | 15:32 |
| rlandy|ruck | marios: he - question wrt upgrades | 15:33 |
| rlandy|ruck | marios: https://meet.google.com/ave-qqzn-whm?pli=1&authuser=0 - if you have a few minutes | 15:34 |
| marios | rlandy|ruck: sure gimme sec | 15:36 |
| chandankumar | see ya! | 15:37 |
| rlandy|ruck | https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?job_name=periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-upgrade-master | 15:41 |
| rlandy|ruck | marios: ^^ | 15:41 |
| rlandy|ruck | periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-upgrade-wallaby (non-voting) | 15:41 |
| *** marios is now known as marios|out | 15:56 | |
| rlandy|ruck | lunch brb | 16:50 |
| *** jpena is now known as jpena|off | 17:04 | |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 17:29 | |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: you all set? | 17:46 |
| rlandy|ruck | need to meet about anything? | 17:46 |
| rlandy|ruck | ruck-rover tool? | 17:46 |
| * rlandy|ruck checking pojadhav|out's reviews on internal | 17:46 | |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: everything seems ok by now | 17:48 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: chaging rr tool already | 17:48 |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: you rock - thank you | 17:48 |
| dviroel|rover | *changing | 17:49 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: see that you are already chasing victoria | 17:49 |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: at least you;re not bored here :) | 17:49 |
| rlandy|ruck | yep chased master | 17:49 |
| dviroel|rover | not at all | 17:49 |
| rlandy|ruck | and victoria | 17:49 |
| dviroel|rover | yeah, master promoted | 17:49 |
| rlandy|ruck | so we should be all set | 17:49 |
| rlandy|ruck | watching downstream now | 17:50 |
| rlandy|ruck | and need to get back to CIX stuff | 17:50 |
| rlandy|ruck | oh and train c7 promoted as well | 17:51 |
| rlandy|ruck | nice | 17:51 |
| rlandy|ruck | sshnaidm: hey ... https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/stream/0567958abd2543499b61ebe49696c165?logfile=console.log | 17:56 |
| rlandy|ruck | looks like your test patch worked | 17:56 |
| rlandy|ruck | hmm ... | 17:58 |
| * rlandy|ruck does not see "Install required packages used in modify-image role" run though | 17:58 | |
| rlandy|ruck | modify-image not called there | 17:59 |
| rlandy|ruck | ha | 17:59 |
| rlandy|ruck | fs002? | 17:59 |
| rlandy|ruck | run on victoria | 18:04 |
| rlandy|ruck | didn't run on test change | 18:08 |
| rlandy|ruck | trying again | 18:08 |
| ade_lee_ | dviroel|rover, ping | 18:20 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: makes sense to raise an error for '--promotion_label=current-tripleo-rdo' + --component="any" | 18:20 |
| ade_lee_ | dviroel|rover, hey - so my fips job got some results back | 18:20 |
| dviroel|rover | ade_lee_: hi | 18:20 |
| ade_lee_ | and would like to try to figure out whats going on -- have a meeting in 10 mins - but maybe we can look afterwards | 18:21 |
| ade_lee_ | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/808215 | 18:21 |
| ade_lee_ | a couple things I noticed though .. | 18:21 |
| dviroel|rover | ade_lee_: i can take a look in a few minutes and we sync after | 18:21 |
| ade_lee_ | cool - 1. scenario 2 still has no logs :( | 18:22 |
| ade_lee_ | 2. scenario 4 has iscsid chap algorithms not set -- I think I need to set something special to enable an override on a standalone job. | 18:23 |
| dviroel|rover | ack | 18:23 |
| ade_lee_ | the override seems to work in the multinode case but not this one | 18:23 |
| ade_lee_ | and gotta investigate standalone ipa - something about a mysql resource bundle not completing | 18:24 |
| * rlandy|ruck looks | 18:27 | |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: it should whatever current-tripleo without components | 18:28 |
| rlandy|ruck | so tripleo-ci-testing | 18:28 |
| rlandy|ruck | is probably a better example | 18:28 |
| rlandy|ruck | pojadhav|out: updated https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/q/topic:%22osp_trunk_https%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) | 18:42 |
| rlandy|ruck | added cockpit config | 18:42 |
| rlandy|ruck | and missing release file changes | 18:58 |
| rlandy|ruck | pls review | 18:58 |
| dviroel|rover | ack | 19:12 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: who uses the rr tool to populate influxdb? | 19:14 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: so i can add the new parameters to generate rdo info | 19:14 |
| dviroel|rover | found this last_promotions.py | 19:15 |
| dviroel|rover | jobs_blocking_promotion.conf | 19:16 |
| rlandy|ruck | the cockpit | 19:17 |
| dviroel|rover | hum, might be this conf file | 19:21 |
| dviroel|rover | https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/34410/1/ci-scripts/infra-setup/roles/rrcockpit/files/telegraf_py3/telegraf.d/jobs_blocking_promotion.conf#9 | 19:21 |
| rlandy|ruck | nearly out of meeting | 19:24 |
| rlandy|ruck | will ping you | 19:25 |
| dviroel|rover | https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/36471 | 19:37 |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: k - out of meeting | 19:38 |
| rlandy|ruck | can I help with something? | 19:38 |
| rlandy|ruck | you all set? | 19:38 |
| * rlandy|ruck looks at review | 19:38 | |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: the influx outputs looks correct | 19:39 |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: do you have a cockpit env set up? | 19:39 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: no :( | 19:39 |
| dviroel|rover | how hard is that? | 19:39 |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: k - let me take you through that | 19:40 |
| rlandy|ruck | https://meet.google.com/ote-wspf-puf?pli=1&authuser=0 | 19:40 |
| ade_lee_ | dviroel|rover, hey - out of my meeting | 20:17 |
| dviroel|rover | ade_lee_: hello there, didn't have time to look at | 20:17 |
| dviroel|rover | ade_lee_: can look now | 20:17 |
| ade_lee_ | dviroel|rover, cool | 20:17 |
| rlandy|ruck | hmm ... master didn't promote | 20:18 |
| ade_lee_ | dviroel|rover, rlandy|ruck so -- in https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/808215 I set enable_fips, so that the overcloud deployment would include a fips env file | 20:23 |
| ade_lee_ | ie. via https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/815143 | 20:24 |
| ade_lee_ | so that seems to work just fine for the mutinode deployment | 20:24 |
| ade_lee_ | but I don't see the same thing on the standalone jobs | 20:25 |
| ade_lee_ | do I need to do something different there? | 20:25 |
| rlandy|ruck | yep - standalone has it's own var I think | 20:27 |
| rlandy|ruck | checking | 20:27 |
| rlandy|ruck | so for standalone ... | 20:28 |
| rlandy|ruck | https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/q/topic:%22osp_trunk_https%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged) | 20:29 |
| rlandy|ruck | oops | 20:29 |
| rlandy|ruck | https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/blob/master/roles/standalone/tasks/standalone-install.yml#L28 | 20:29 |
| rlandy|ruck | ade_lee_: you can see an example here: https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/src/branch/master/config/general_config/featureset052.yml#L19 | 20:31 |
| rlandy|ruck | standalone is fs052 | 20:32 |
| rlandy|ruck | so you can add to it | 20:32 |
| rlandy|ruck | with a {%if fips .... | 20:32 |
| rlandy|ruck | see example where low-memory-usage is seen: https://storage.gra.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_83c/815384/2/check/tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone/83ccf20/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/index.html | 20:36 |
| ade_lee_ | rlandy|ruck, ok cool thanks -- so it sounds like I need to edit featureset 52 to include the file | 20:38 |
| rlandy|ruck | ade_lee_: yeah - just add to the list of standalone_custom_env_files: | 20:39 |
| rlandy|ruck | with the if condition | 20:39 |
| ade_lee_ | or I just need to override standalone_custom_env_files | 20:39 |
| rlandy|ruck | you can | 20:39 |
| ade_lee_ | if enable_fips | 20:39 |
| rlandy|ruck | but you'd need a featureset_override | 20:39 |
| * rlandy|ruck checks if there is one | 20:40 | |
| ade_lee_ | yeah | 20:40 |
| ade_lee_ | rlandy|ruck, if I do "if enable_fips " .. that parameter is what is passed in in vars: ? | 20:41 |
| rlandy|ruck | https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-ci/blob/master/roles/run-test/tasks/main.yaml#L19 | 20:41 |
| rlandy|ruck | that exists | 20:41 |
| rlandy|ruck | so we could add an override for you | 20:41 |
| rlandy|ruck | same as you used in when: enable_fips|bool | 20:42 |
| ade_lee_ | ok cool - I'll try that | 20:42 |
| rlandy|ruck | or if you pass it in an job | 20:42 |
| ade_lee_ | thanks | 20:42 |
| rlandy|ruck | job.enable_fips | 20:42 |
| ade_lee_ | eh? | 20:42 |
| rlandy|ruck | ie: if you pass the | 20:43 |
| * rlandy|ruck explains | 20:43 | |
| rlandy|ruck | example: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/813083/7/config/general_config/featureset001.yml | 20:43 |
| ade_lee_ | rlandy|ruck, right now - my job is defined here https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/808215/45/zuul.d/base.yaml | 20:43 |
| rlandy|ruck | that's fine | 20:44 |
| rlandy|ruck | same way | 20:44 |
| ade_lee_ | so I define the var in featureset_override (enable_fips) | 20:44 |
| rlandy|ruck | f you don;t have a default defined in standalone | 20:44 |
| rlandy|ruck | enable_fips|default(false)|bool | 20:45 |
| ade_lee_ | ack | 20:45 |
| rlandy|ruck | if you have trouble, ping, we can edit it together | 20:45 |
| ade_lee_ | rlandy|ruck, ack thanks | 20:48 |
| rlandy|ruck | ade_lee_: geen probleem:) | 20:52 |
| ade_lee_ | rlandy|ruck, so something like this -- https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/815750 ? | 20:56 |
| rlandy|ruck | or something like: https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/blob/master/roles/overcloud-deploy/defaults/main.yml#L120 | 20:58 |
| rlandy|ruck | ade_lee_: your one should work | 20:59 |
| rlandy|ruck | ade_lee_: you may need >- | 20:59 |
| rlandy|ruck | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/815750/1/config/general_config/featureset052.yml#42 | 20:59 |
| rlandy|ruck | like ^^ | 20:59 |
| ade_lee_ | ack -- I was looking at what you had above .. | 21:01 |
| ade_lee_ | rlandy|ruck, and I already have this -- https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/815143 | 21:02 |
| ade_lee_ | but it didn't work in the standalone case | 21:02 |
| rlandy|ruck | meaning? | 21:05 |
| rlandy|ruck | it didn't the file or it didn't render? | 21:05 |
| ade_lee_ | didn't add the file | 21:05 |
| ade_lee_ | anyways tried with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/815750 lets see what happens | 21:06 |
| rlandy|ruck | where is enable_fips defined? | 21:07 |
| ade_lee_ | in the job .. | 21:07 |
| ade_lee_ | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/808215/46/zuul.d/base.yaml | 21:07 |
| rlandy|ruck | ok - so two things to try out | 21:08 |
| rlandy|ruck | take away the if condition | 21:09 |
| rlandy|ruck | and just add the second item to the list | 21:09 |
| rlandy|ruck | see if it adds | 21:09 |
| rlandy|ruck | that will tell us if we have the right place | 21:09 |
| ade_lee_ | rlandy|ruck, so -- I mentioned that for mutinode, it was added | 21:10 |
| rlandy|ruck | right - but I want to see if the var is overridden anywhere else | 21:10 |
| rlandy|ruck | gmeet? | 21:10 |
| ade_lee_ | sure | 21:10 |
| rlandy|ruck | https://meet.google.com/vws-dnqw-qvd?pli=1&authuser=0 | 21:11 |
| rlandy|ruck | ade_lee_: https://github.com/openstack/ansible-role-collect-logs/ | 21:22 |
| rlandy|ruck | https://github.com/openstack/ansible-role-collect-logs/blob/master/roles/collect_logs/vars/unsecure.yml | 21:25 |
| *** dviroel|rover is now known as dviroel|rover|afk | 22:08 | |
| *** rlandy|ruck is now known as rlandy|ruck|afk | 22:23 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!