| ykarel | chandankumar, ysandeep when you get chance please review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/814699 | 04:47 |
|---|---|---|
| ysandeep | ykarel: good morning, ack | 04:49 |
| *** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 06:06 | |
| ysandeep | folks fyi.. chandankumar on half day PTO(first half) | 07:08 |
| marios | ack thanks ysandeep | 07:09 |
| bhagyashris | is jira link working ? | 07:14 |
| ysandeep | bhagyashris, let me check | 07:16 |
| bhagyashris | ysandeep, now working for me | 07:17 |
| bhagyashris | ysandeep, thanks :) | 07:17 |
| ysandeep | ack | 07:17 |
| bhagyashris | ysandeep, working on firefox... not chrome not sure why | 07:18 |
| ysandeep | bhagyashris: same here, pm | 07:21 |
| akahat | marios, https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/34602 | 07:33 |
| marios | akahat: https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?pipeline=openstack-periodic-integration-stable1 | 07:40 |
| marios | akahat: https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?pipeline=openstack-periodic-integration-main | 07:40 |
| akahat | marios, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-tempest-skiplist/+/814855/comment/cc106bcd_bb975974/ | 07:43 |
| marios | https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?job_name=periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario010-kvm-standalone-octavia-ussuri&project=testproject | 07:46 |
| marios | akahat: ^^^ | 07:46 |
| *** ykarel is now known as ykarel|lunch | 07:49 | |
| ysandeep | bhagyashris: pm | 08:21 |
| frenzy_friday | hey, I am back, is anyone working on Standalone full tempest api ? Otherwise I can take it | 08:32 |
| *** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel | 09:35 | |
| bhagyashris | frenzy_friday, i think amol is working on it | 09:54 |
| bhagyashris | standalone full tempest scenarios is working i have tested that | 09:54 |
| bhagyashris | frenzy_friday, fyi https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/35229 | 09:56 |
| frenzy_friday | cool, thanks | 09:56 |
| ysandeep | bhagyashris, frenzy_friday full-tempest-api is passing here: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/35229 | 10:00 |
| bhagyashris | ysandeep, yes i have updated the card | 10:01 |
| *** rlandy is now known as rlandy|ruck | 10:32 | |
| rlandy|ruck | akahat: hi - you around? | 10:35 |
| rlandy|ruck | let's sync re: scenario010 | 10:35 |
| akahat | rlandy|ruck, o/ yes. i'm here | 10:36 |
| akahat | rlandy|ruck, yeah sure. | 10:36 |
| rlandy|ruck | akahat: https://meet.google.com/hrr-bzrh-xic?pli=1&authuser=0 | 10:37 |
| akahat | rlandy|ruck, https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/34602 | 10:39 |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|afk | 10:48 | |
| *** jbadiapa_ is now known as jbadiapa | 11:00 | |
| rlandy|ruck | bhagyashris: chandankumar: ysandeep|afk: booked meeting tomorrow for bhagyashris to give us all the TC tasks we need to take on | 11:02 |
| rlandy|ruck | pojadhav|ruck: hello | 11:02 |
| bhagyashris | rlandy|ruck, ack thanks i was planning the same | 11:05 |
| *** dviroel|rover|afk is now known as dviroel|rover | 11:10 | |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: hello | 11:18 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: hi o/ | 11:18 |
| dviroel|rover | introspect node still hitting us | 11:19 |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: yeah - two things | 11:21 |
| rlandy|ruck | let's sync | 11:21 |
| rlandy|ruck | https://meet.google.com/mof-ygnk-wzf?pli=1&authuser=0 | 11:21 |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: ^^ | 11:21 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/815081 | 11:24 |
| chandankumar | rlandy|ruck: sure, thanks :-) | 11:28 |
| rlandy|ruck | chandankumar: will ping you in a sec | 11:28 |
| chandankumar | rlandy|ruck: sure | 11:29 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-common/+/814653 | 11:31 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: fyi https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/35132 - PS17 | 11:32 |
| rlandy|ruck | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/813629 | 11:35 |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover; pojadhav|ruck: arxcruz: ^^ need to figure out a merge plan here | 11:36 |
| arxcruz | rlandy|ruck: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/36136 is the test project, just finished the upgrade but i just notice i choose the undercloud upgrade | 11:37 |
| arxcruz | i'm not running the overcloud-upgrade job as well, but the underrcloud upgrade job passes | 11:38 |
| arxcruz | rlandy|ruck: https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/build/734e0ba4e7f24002b8c31fe49c9a0c14 | 11:38 |
| rlandy|ruck | arxcruz: sounds good - let's talk about it after sprint call | 11:40 |
| arxcruz | ok | 11:40 |
| rlandy|ruck | chandankumar: joining review time | 11:44 |
| chandankumar | rlandy|ruck: syre | 11:44 |
| chandankumar | sure | 11:44 |
| chandankumar | joining in 2mins | 11:46 |
| rlandy|ruck | k | 11:46 |
| frenzy_friday | rlandy|ruck, marios, chandankumar when you get some time - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/813970/ | 11:48 |
| * frenzy_friday has bad wifi today | 11:48 | |
| rlandy|ruck | frenzy_friday: hey - I tested out your CIX - wrked - going to switch today | 11:49 |
| frenzy_friday | cool, I updated after marios' comment | 11:49 |
| *** ysandeep|afk is now known as ysandeep | 11:50 | |
| ysandeep | chandankumar, dviroel|rover when you have time, What do you think about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/806910/11#message-8e659451b8ba75cade46f31daf81efa7fe7b7b12 | 11:56 |
| soniya29 | rlandy|ruck, arxcruz, chandankumar, please review this patch - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-tempest-skiplist/+/814903 | 12:07 |
| dviroel|rover | ysandeep: hi, read your reply in comments ^ | 12:12 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 12:12 | |
| dviroel|rover | my idea was to use another operation from yum-config, like chandan added here: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/800577/58/roles/tripleo-repos/tasks/main.yml#130 | 12:12 |
| dviroel|rover | ysandeep: i wasn't clear enough in my comments | 12:13 |
| dviroel|rover | ysandeep: it generates all repos for a compose-id | 12:13 |
| ysandeep | dviroel|rover: From our discussion with Alex in PTG, I think we agreed to use c9 release content everywhere, apart from stream deps line. | 12:15 |
| ysandeep | dviroel|rover, >> my idea was to use another operation from yum-config --> where - in repo_cmd_before ? | 12:16 |
| ysandeep | dviroel|rover, do you want to chat for few mins if you have sometime, otherwise we can discuss in scrum. | 12:17 |
| dviroel|rover | ysandeep: sorry, was looking the patch | 12:24 |
| dviroel|rover | ysandeep: no sure how this will conflict with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/800577/58/roles/tripleo-repos/tasks/main.yml#130, which also configures the same repos | 12:25 |
| ysandeep | dviroel|rover, I agree we can use the approach used by chandankumar: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/800577/58/roles/tripleo-repos/tasks/main.yml#130 , but is that long term? I mean once c9 content is released on mirrors.. we will be utilizing that.. | 12:26 |
| dviroel|rover | ysandeep: not sure, we can think on extending the tool to configure this things for us too, when we get c9 release. Otherwise, we come back to old release style :P | 12:27 |
| dviroel|rover | ysandeep: but yes, today we can read and generate compose repos only | 12:27 |
| dviroel|rover | ysandeep: not against your approach, just thinking that we have 2 places setting compose repos | 12:28 |
| ysandeep | dviroel|rover, atleast for standalone jobs: tripleo-repos is not triggered: https://logserver.rdoproject.org/29/35229/27/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-standalone-master/797bf44/job-output.txt | 12:29 |
| ysandeep | https://logserver.rdoproject.org/29/35229/27/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-9-standalone-master/797bf44/logs/undercloud/etc/yum.repos.d/ - only quickstart-* repos are layed out | 12:30 |
| chandankumar | ysandeep: in periodic integration line tripleo-repos is not used there | 12:30 |
| chandankumar | we use release file there | 12:30 |
| chandankumar | oh sorry you are sharing that info | 12:31 |
| dviroel|rover | chandankumar: tks | 12:32 |
| dviroel|rover | ysandeep: so its up to you, we can or not use tripleo-repos there to generate things | 12:32 |
| dviroel|rover | ysandeep: we can merge at it is, and improve things later with yum-config | 12:33 |
| ysandeep | dviroel|rover, chandankumar ack, imho.. we should go ahead with current approach, and once c9 content is available.. we follow same approach as wallaby.. But i am open to discuss if you think alternative approaches are better. | 12:34 |
| dviroel|rover | ysandeep: ok for me, no worries | 12:35 |
| ysandeep | dviroel|rover, ++ thanks for hearing me out and your suggestions. | 12:36 |
| chandankumar | soniya29: please have a look at comments when free https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-tempest-skiplist/+/814903/1#message-884c9afd7d60c193e97fb729433d57b6fd4336d8 | 12:36 |
| chandankumar | ysandeep: \o. Does the venv patch working downstream also? | 12:37 |
| soniya29 | chandankumar, sure | 12:37 |
| dviroel|rover | ysandeep: ty sandeep, answered you comment in the patch too. | 12:38 |
| ysandeep | chandankumar: yes it works with downstream, I have updated that patch this morning, Only touching C9 now(as we discussed we will create a separate card for switching venv for c8 and C7), There are some suggestion from ykarel and some open question from marios (which I am still checking out) | 12:39 |
| chandankumar | ysandeep: thank you for working on that, I will take a look now :-) | 12:40 |
| ysandeep | chandankumar, replied to marios comment here: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/813624/16#message-5fc8d3cad2dbd35883d89ec1a8221fb34c0f9422 , updating patchset with yatin suggestions. | 12:53 |
| *** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 12:54 | |
| *** jpena|off is now known as jpena | 12:59 | |
| bhagyashris | frenzy_friday, rlandy|ruck soniya29 pojadhav|ruck dviroel|rover scrum time.. | 13:01 |
| soniya29 | bhagyashris, i am in | 13:01 |
| arxcruz | chandankumar: guten morgen | 13:01 |
| chandankumar | arxcruz: auch dir einen guten morgen :-) | 13:02 |
| chandankumar | I am not sure how much is correct, sorry google translator | 13:02 |
| arxcruz | chandankumar: Ich wünsche dir auch einen guten morgen i think | 13:07 |
| bhagyashris | review list | 13:13 |
| bhagyashris | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/806910 | 13:13 |
| bhagyashris | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/813624 | 13:13 |
| ysandeep | chandankumar, fyi.. I was referring this: https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/blob/master/roles/repo-setup/tasks/setup_repos_new.yml#L34 , to me looks like we need C9 content on mirror first.. before utilizing it just like wallaby | 13:21 |
| bhagyashris | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/813618 | 13:25 |
| *** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away | 13:25 | |
| dviroel|rover | chandankumar: is this what you need https://issues.redhat.com/browse/TRIPLEOCI-667 ? | 13:38 |
| dviroel|rover | for delorean repo | 13:39 |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: ade_lee: tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-on-multinode-ipa is going to have to go non-voting | 13:59 |
| rlandy|ruck | until we sort out the 1.1.1.1 issue | 13:59 |
| dviroel|rover | :( | 13:59 |
| rlandy|ruck | failing gate | 13:59 |
| arxcruz | marios: rlandy|ruck dviroel|rover https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/813629/7/roles/run-test/templates/toci_gate_test.sh.j2 | 13:59 |
| ade_lee | rlandy|ruck, dviroel|rover so it didn't work? | 13:59 |
| rlandy|ruck | not yet merged | 13:59 |
| ade_lee | rlandy|ruck, in meeting, but I'll check back shortly | 14:00 |
| rlandy|ruck | ade_lee: dviroel|rover: yep - will put in patcj | 14:00 |
| rlandy|ruck | patch | 14:00 |
| rlandy|ruck | we can decide if we merge or not | 14:00 |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: ^^ going to put in a patch for non-voting and out of gate | 14:07 |
| rlandy|ruck | we can decide to merge that or not | 14:08 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: ade_lee btw, here are testproject results on 'disable dnssec validation' approach: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/36374/2#message-20ba546dc8df7764b89ca1bcccb64aabe14ee9b1 | 14:09 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: ade_lee looks like it works with 1.1.1.1 | 14:10 |
| chandankumar | dviroel|rover: checking | 14:10 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: ade_lee so, dnssec might not being used anyway in the job | 14:10 |
| chandankumar | sshnaidm: rlandy|ruck https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/814428 just a rebase | 14:14 |
| chandankumar | sshnaidm: rlandy|ruck https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/813618/6 also good to go | 14:15 |
| rlandy|ruck | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/813618 | 14:24 |
| rlandy|ruck | ok to merge? | 14:24 |
| rlandy|ruck | or waiting on sshnaidm? | 14:24 |
| chandankumar | yes good to go | 14:26 |
| chandankumar | ysandeep: please have a look https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/813624/17#message-758f57f804705916e1862bca67d5c104d779d042 when free, thanks! | 14:27 |
| ysandeep | chandankumar: ack, going through your comment on release file patch, will check soon | 14:29 |
| chandankumar | rlandy|ruck: dviroel|rover https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?result=NODE_FAILURE may be it is temprory | 14:43 |
| sshnaidm | rlandy|ruck, hey | 14:43 |
| chandankumar | ysandeep: one more https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/806910/13#message-8ad12de904b8136ccd775eea905803b85a53fc9c | 14:51 |
| chandankumar | not sure want to do in this or in a seperate patch | 14:51 |
| dviroel|rover | chandankumar: ack, tks | 14:52 |
| ysandeep | chandankumar, as you suggested.. separate patch for older releases... remove from here.. | 14:53 |
| rlandy|ruck | sshnaidm: what's up? | 14:53 |
| ysandeep | chandankumar, I will propose a patch for older releases tomorrow | 14:54 |
| chandankumar | ysandeep: sure, thanks :-) | 14:54 |
| rlandy|ruck | ysandeep: anything that needs to be picked up on the downstream? | 14:54 |
| sshnaidm | rlandy|ruck, I'm going through changes in tripleo-ipa, and it seems like we don't actually build tripleo-ipa repo package in our 039 job | 14:55 |
| sshnaidm | rlandy|ruck, was it intentional or because it's in x/openstack repos? | 14:55 |
| ysandeep | rlandy|ruck, downstream is in bad shape because of infra issues.. I don't think we will be able to promote anything till that resolves.. | 14:56 |
| rlandy|ruck | sshnaidm: it moved to x/openstack | 14:56 |
| rlandy|ruck | after we created fs039 | 14:56 |
| rlandy|ruck | might have been an oversight | 14:56 |
| sshnaidm | rlandy|ruck, so we actually don't build it in patches | 14:56 |
| rlandy|ruck | ysandeep: ack - ok | 14:56 |
| ysandeep | rlandy|ruck, for handover, psedlak didn't reply to my ping, incase he reply back after i left.. you can chat him about failures | 14:57 |
| rlandy|ruck | I don;t think so | 14:57 |
| rlandy|ruck | ysandeep: ack - if he responds | 14:57 |
| sshnaidm | amoralej, hi, is there any problem with building tripleo-ipa in DLRN? https://opendev.org/x/tripleo-ipa | 14:57 |
| chandankumar | https://github.com/rdo-packages/tripleo-ipa-distgit distgit exists | 14:58 |
| amoralej | it should be in dlrn | 14:58 |
| amoralej | i see it in the tags | 14:58 |
| amoralej | in security component | 14:58 |
| amoralej | don't you find it? | 14:58 |
| rlandy|ruck | I think in our jobs we pull it from source as well | 14:59 |
| rlandy|ruck | which might be the confusion | 14:59 |
| ade_lee | rlandy|ruck, dviroel|rover so - with the dnssec disable patch , are we all good for the 1.1.1.1 issue? | 15:02 |
| sshnaidm | amoralej, I don't see it's built.. | 15:02 |
| dviroel|rover | ade_lee: yes, 1.1.1.1 isn't failing if we disable that validation | 15:03 |
| amoralej | sshnaidm, it's ansible-tripleo-ipa https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-master/status_report.html | 15:03 |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: ade_lee: what's stopping us merging that patch? | 15:04 |
| dviroel|rover | ade_lee: for instance https://logserver.rdoproject.org/74/36374/2/check/tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-on-multinode-ipa/9be4f1b/logs/38.102.83.96/var/log/ipaserver-install.log.txt.gz | 15:04 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: nothing atm, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/815081 | 15:05 |
| ade_lee | rlandy|ruck, I have no objections | 15:05 |
| ysandeep | dviroel|rover, rlandy|ruck: weird.. gate job didn't triggered on my patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/+/814322 even after +w from many hours, Have you faced something similar with other patches? | 15:05 |
| dviroel|rover | ade_lee: please vote https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/815081 | 15:05 |
| ade_lee | done | 15:06 |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: ok - let's try merge that | 15:06 |
| dviroel|rover | ade_lee: tks | 15:06 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: ok | 15:06 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: there is no conflicts with opendns patch, so we can merge the revert later | 15:06 |
| rlandy|ruck | ysandeep: occasionally - rebase and w+ again | 15:07 |
| rlandy|ruck | ysandeep: zuul git restarted | 15:07 |
| rlandy|ruck | you may have hit that | 15:07 |
| ysandeep | rlandy|ruck, ack thanks! | 15:07 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 15:09 | |
| *** dviroel|rover is now known as dviroel|rover|lunch | 15:15 | |
| rlandy|ruck | Tengu: dviroel|rover|lunch: just touching base about the introspection reviews | 15:24 |
| rlandy|ruck | Tengu: you mentioned a change for your lab to work | 15:24 |
| Tengu | rlandy|ruck: oh, no... not a change. | 15:24 |
| Tengu | a "workaround" for me to deploy | 15:24 |
| Tengu | basically, wait for the failure, run the "unprovision" command, and re-run the provisioning | 15:25 |
| rlandy|ruck | yeah - I don't know if we can use that in CI | 15:25 |
| rlandy|ruck | you reprovisioned your nodes? | 15:25 |
| Tengu | yeah. basically, once it fails, I run `openstack overcloud node unprovision --all --yes --stack overcloud-0 ~/metalsmith-0.yaml', wait for it to end, and re-run the provision command | 15:26 |
| Tengu | second attempt makes it fine | 15:26 |
| Tengu | I'm also in touch with Harald, since I'm able to reproduce this issue in a local env. | 15:26 |
| rlandy|ruck | provision works | 15:26 |
| rlandy|ruck | we are failing on introspection | 15:27 |
| Tengu | oh. wait. you're talking about introspection | 15:27 |
| Tengu | X( | 15:27 |
| ysandeep | chandankumar, replied back: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/813624/17#message-194b0ec51613ef06ab1cdc7b7daf1462d87129cc | 15:27 |
| Tengu | that one isn't failing here... | 15:27 |
| Tengu | though I did see provisioning failing on OVB job as well. | 15:27 |
| Tengu | 1s | 15:27 |
| Tengu | getting the link... | 15:28 |
| Tengu | https://logserver.rdoproject.org/86/812286/9/openstack-check/tripleo-ci-centos-8-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001/199e728/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/overcloud_node_provision.log.txt.gz (but it doesn't look like my own issue) | 15:28 |
| chandankumar | ysandeep: thanks :-) | 15:30 |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|out | 15:32 | |
| chandankumar | rlandy|ruck: please merge this one https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/config/+/36234 depends on lands | 15:41 |
| chandankumar | with recheck | 15:41 |
| chandankumar | see ya! | 15:50 |
| Tengu | rlandy|ruck: sooo.... you talked about that tripleo-ci-testing state for the packages? | 15:55 |
| rlandy|ruck | Tengu: yes | 15:55 |
| rlandy|ruck | chandankumar: ack | 15:55 |
| rlandy|ruck | have a good night | 15:56 |
| Tengu | rlandy|ruck: basically, is it just adding this new "pipe" in there? https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/cjeanner/git-api/-/blob/master/git_api/libs/nvr.py#L18 | 15:57 |
| Tengu | i.e. same directory structure and everything? | 15:57 |
| rlandy|ruck | looking | 15:57 |
| rlandy|ruck | yep | 15:57 |
| rlandy|ruck | all the rest is the same | 15:57 |
| Tengu | ok. and it's right before hitting "current-tripleo" if I get it right? | 15:58 |
| rlandy|ruck | yep ... current -> consistent -> component-ci-testing -> promoted-components -> tripleo-ci-testing -> current-tripleo | 15:58 |
| rlandy|ruck | and then current-tripleo-rdo | 15:58 |
| rlandy|ruck | those are all the possible tags | 15:59 |
| Tengu | should LADA support them all? | 15:59 |
| rlandy|ruck | depends how much time you want to put into it :) | 15:59 |
| rlandy|ruck | ideally, yes | 15:59 |
| Tengu | if structure is the same for all.... not a big issue for me. | 15:59 |
| rlandy|ruck | if it does not crowd your I too much | 15:59 |
| rlandy|ruck | UI | 15:59 |
| Tengu | first found first returned | 16:00 |
| Tengu | that's why I'm doing it in reverse. | 16:00 |
| Tengu | closest to promotion first. | 16:00 |
| Tengu | rlandy|ruck: do you happen to get a patch that is in one of those "other" state? | 16:01 |
| Tengu | by any chance | 16:01 |
| rlandy|ruck | so a patch is not in tripleo-ci-testing | 16:03 |
| Tengu | ah. errr... soo ? | 16:03 |
| rlandy|ruck | the integration line is in that state | 16:03 |
| * rlandy|ruck gets | 16:04 | |
| Tengu | hm. I'm afraid I don't get it. would you have a minute or two for a quick call? that might be faster | 16:04 |
| rlandy|ruck | https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-master/tripleo-ci-testing/delorean.repo | 16:04 |
| rlandy|ruck | sure | 16:04 |
| Tengu | https://meet.google.com/kap-xonj-hwc | 16:04 |
| *** dviroel|rover|lunch is now known as dviroel|rover | 16:11 | |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/testproject/+/35132/17#message-eca941e5cc5ae64a541713d3bc2be064004b19a4 | 16:17 |
| dviroel|rover | introspect node took ~25min, but the job didn't finish within the required time | 16:17 |
| rlandy|ruck | oh great :( | 16:19 |
| Tengu | rlandy|ruck: https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/cjeanner/git-api/-/merge_requests/44 :) | 16:19 |
| rlandy|ruck | Tengu++ thanks | 16:20 |
| Tengu | np - I'll wait for your MR for the doc, and then do some more testing. Though..... well. your MR will hit the gitlab limitation about the runners -.- | 16:20 |
| Tengu | rlandy|ruck: lemme add you to the project so that you can push in a dedicated branch directly on it. | 16:21 |
| Tengu | rlandy|ruck: you should get an invite, allowing you to push | 16:23 |
| Tengu | rlandy|ruck: *to create MR within the project directly. | 16:24 |
| Tengu | this will allow to run it through my gitlab-runner instance. | 16:24 |
| Tengu | and now... time for me to sign off :). | 16:25 |
| Tengu | See you around Folks! | 16:25 |
| rlandy|ruck | k - thanks | 16:26 |
| arxcruz | rlandy|ruck: 1-1? | 16:31 |
| rlandy|ruck | joining | 16:31 |
| rlandy|ruck | arxcruz: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/813970 | 16:35 |
| rlandy|ruck | lunch - brb | 17:04 |
| *** jpena is now known as jpena|off | 17:05 | |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: pojadhav|ruck: I updated the CIX tool | 20:09 |
| rlandy|ruck | let me know if you see issues with cards being created | 20:09 |
| rlandy|ruck | or not | 20:09 |
| dviroel|rover | ack | 20:18 |
| dviroel|rover | rlandy|ruck: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/36395 | 20:24 |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover: thanks - merging after zuul votes | 20:28 |
| *** holser is now known as holser_ | 20:28 | |
| *** holser_ is now known as holser | 20:29 | |
| dviroel|rover | component lines seems ok, only waiting tripleo-component to run | 20:52 |
| * dviroel|rover going out | 20:53 | |
| *** dviroel|rover is now known as dviroel|rover|out | 20:56 | |
| rlandy|ruck | dviroel|rover|out: thanks | 21:03 |
| rlandy|ruck | Tengu: https://gitlab.cee.redhat.com/cjeanner/git-api/-/merge_requests/44 - failed to merge | 21:26 |
| *** holser is now known as holser_ | 22:11 | |
| *** holser_ is now known as holser | 23:03 | |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!