*** rlandy|bbl is now known as rlandy | 01:36 | |
*** ykarel|away is now known as ykarel | 04:14 | |
*** zbr is now known as Guest2488 | 05:03 | |
*** marios is now known as marios|ruck | 05:44 | |
*** raukadah is now known as chandankumar | 05:46 | |
anbanerj|rover | marios|ruck, O/ | 07:10 |
---|---|---|
anbanerj|rover | The ooctavia patch didnt fix periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario010-ovn-provider-standalone-train and periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario010-standalone-train . It still timeouts. "'br-tenant' not found for network 'tenant'" | 07:11 |
marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: o/ | 07:20 |
marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: k thanks dealing with some other stuff now will try check later please add info in the bug? | 07:20 |
anbanerj|rover | marios|ruck, sure | 07:22 |
anbanerj|rover | I am rechecking the gate failures - only a few today | 07:23 |
bhagyashris | Welcome chandankumar :) | 07:28 |
marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: we have a new blocker for master digging now to file it (updates job started failing yesterday ) | 07:29 |
anbanerj|rover | ack | 07:29 |
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena | 07:31 | |
chandankumar | bhagyashris, thanks :-) | 07:34 |
raukadah | bhagyashris, Hello, I have added the comments on the extended hash revert patch https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/34125 It might help. | 08:27 |
bhagyashris | raukadah, hey we had a dicussion day before yesterday | 08:27 |
*** raukadah is now known as chandankumar | 08:28 | |
bhagyashris | and in the discussion we come up with two solutions | 08:28 |
bhagyashris | and i have pushed the patches for that | 08:28 |
bhagyashris | waiting for wes reviews as he was on leave yesterday | 08:28 |
bhagyashris | solution | 08:28 |
bhagyashris | 1. is revert back all the extended has changes | 08:28 |
bhagyashris | 2. use extended hash only for downstream promotions | 08:28 |
bhagyashris | mostly we will go with 2nd solution | 08:29 |
chandankumar | bhagyashris, We donot need the revert, we need to fix the conditional for full hash | 08:29 |
bhagyashris | 1. https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/34125 | 08:29 |
bhagyashris | 2. https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/34124 | 08:29 |
chandankumar | I read the commit message, based on that, I added my comments | 08:29 |
bhagyashris | chandankumar, yeah but that was just suggestion but we will mostly go with second solution that use extended hash only for downstream promotions | 08:30 |
bhagyashris | chandankumar, mostly we will not revert or will not remove the extended_hash from modules | 08:31 |
chandankumar | bhagyashris, I have no objection with making it for downstream only, I am just saying, fixing the full hash condition will fix the issue then we donot need to make it for downstream specific . The code will work as it is. | 08:35 |
bhagyashris | chandankumar, ok i will push the 3rd patch with your suggestion and lets decide which should be more appropriate. | 08:37 |
chandankumar | bhagyashris, sure, thanks :-) | 08:37 |
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|lunch | 08:38 | |
*** chem is now known as Guest2501 | 08:51 | |
chandankumar | sshnaidm, hello, Do we still need this change https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/789173 [Deploy content provider registry using podman] ? | 09:37 |
sshnaidm | chandankumar, nope, we have this done | 09:39 |
sshnaidm | chandankumar, welcome back :) | 09:39 |
*** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel | 09:45 | |
akahat | chandankumar, marios|ruck bhagyashris please review: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/34196 | 09:56 |
marios|ruck | akahat: k adding to list | 09:57 |
chandankumar | sshnaidm, thanks :-) | 09:58 |
bhagyashris | akahat, fyi i have pushed tje patch https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/34195 | 09:59 |
bhagyashris | above change will solve our problem | 10:01 |
* akahat back in 1 hour | 10:24 | |
marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: stepping away for a bit food etc biab | 10:54 |
anbanerj|rover | marios|ruck, cool | 10:54 |
*** jpena is now known as jpena|lunch | 11:34 | |
marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: thanks | 11:52 |
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 12:00 | |
*** whayutin is now known as weshay|ruck | 12:10 | |
weshay|ruck | chandankumar, :) hello mr married man | 12:10 |
chandankumar | weshay|ruck, Hello hello :-) | 12:10 |
weshay|ruck | btw folks it's chandankumar's birthday on monday.. so.. it's married_man -> old_man real quick | 12:11 |
weshay|ruck | marios|ruck, anbanerj|rover /me reading and catching up.. anything you folks need? | 12:14 |
rlandy | chandankumar: hey - welcome back and congrats | 12:16 |
marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: o/ not in particular we can catch up after if you need | 12:16 |
chandankumar | rlandy, Thanks :-) | 12:18 |
* chandankumar is still the same man with some additional attributes as number goes up :-) | 12:19 | |
anbanerj|rover | zbr, do you know what ER_OPTS is? https://review.opendev.org/c/opendev/elastic-recheck/+/729623/13/Dockerfile#62 I could not find out where we are exporting it | 12:21 |
rlandy | marios|ruck: do you want to attend the centos stream meeting? | 12:21 |
rlandy | know you are rucking this sprint but maybe it's a ptl thing? | 12:21 |
rlandy | adding you | 12:21 |
marios|ruck | rlandy: sure thanks | 12:22 |
pojadhav | chandankumar, welcome back....!! :) | 12:29 |
rlandy | dviroel: hi centos 8 stream meeting | 12:31 |
dviroel | rlandy: oh, joining | 12:32 |
*** jpena|lunch is now known as jpena | 12:32 | |
ysandeep | Welcome back chandankumar | 13:02 |
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 13:02 | |
chandankumar | ysandeep, thanks :-) | 13:03 |
rlandy | arxcruz: hey - think I left a comment there about naming | 13:04 |
rlandy | tripleo | 13:04 |
arxcruz | rlandy: it was on the skiplist no ? | 13:06 |
rlandy | h - yes | 13:06 |
arxcruz | not on container copy | 13:06 |
rlandy | correct | 13:06 |
arxcruz | rlandy: i'll update the patch | 13:06 |
zbr | anbanerj|rover: probably not used but put there in order to allow us to inject extra options when we want, w/o having to touch the code. | 13:16 |
zbr | please review: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-collect-logs/+/796278 -- artcl job triggering changes | 13:16 |
anbanerj|rover | zbr, ah, ok Not disturbing it then | 13:16 |
soniya29 | weshay|ruck, all RBAC tests discussions are here:- https://hackmd.io/rBqcts18Rc-qCOqe1DM1gg | 13:25 |
soniya29 | ysandeep, Can you help out with the ssh issues? Its again popping up | 13:27 |
weshay|ruck | thanks.. | 13:28 |
ysandeep | soniya29: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884920#c2 add this in your ~/.ssh/config if you want to keep using rsa keys. | 13:31 |
marios|ruck | jpena: o/ hey did you get any confirmation about the kernel upgrade tomorrow (vex) | 13:34 |
jpena | marios: no, I'm asking again | 13:36 |
marios|ruck | jpena: ack thank you | 13:36 |
rlandy | marios|ruck: anbanerj|rover: just wanted to you about scenario010 | 13:36 |
rlandy | and networking in train | 13:36 |
anbanerj|rover | rlandy, for scenario 10 this is what I found http://paste.openstack.org/show/806687/ | 13:37 |
rlandy | marios|ruck: anbanerj|rover: we picked up the ovn change - to fix octavia in train | 13:37 |
rlandy | anbanerj|rover: marios|ruck: right | 13:37 |
rlandy | so it still timed out | 13:37 |
marios|ruck | rlandy: going afk few mins biab | 13:38 |
rlandy | but I moved it to promoted components | 13:38 |
rlandy | marios|ruck: anbanerj|rover: k - pls ping when you are back and we can chat about triple and network | 13:38 |
anbanerj|rover | rlandy, yes, still times out in octavia. I can see "'br-tenant' not found for network 'tenant'" | 13:38 |
rlandy | we need both for downstream | 13:38 |
rlandy | anbanerj|rover: ^^ let's chat about it | 13:39 |
anbanerj|rover | ok | 13:39 |
rlandy | when marios|ruck is back | 13:39 |
rlandy | I also need to get cedric's changes through wallaby | 13:39 |
rlandy | for 17 | 13:39 |
soniya29 | ysandeep, got it resolved, thanks! | 13:42 |
ysandeep | ++ | 13:43 |
bhagyashris | weshay|ruck, should i start the dlrn service on 10.0.148.74 server (master promotion server) | 13:45 |
zbr | weshay|ruck: anbanerj|rover: dual-voting answered: https://projects.engineering.redhat.com/browse/RHOSZUUL-488 | 13:45 |
bhagyashris | after pull this patch changes https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/34196 | 13:46 |
weshay|ruck | bhagyashris, you new patch is on? | 13:50 |
weshay|ruck | if so sure | 13:50 |
bhagyashris | weshay|ruck, yes fix pulled on server | 13:50 |
bhagyashris | weshay|ruck, akahat started service | 13:57 |
akahat | bhagyashris, thanks | 13:58 |
marios|ruck | rlandy: back but we have the repo sync lets talk after | 14:00 |
rlandy | chandankumar: tripleo repos meeting | 14:02 |
*** marios|ruck is now known as marios|call | 14:02 | |
* anbanerj|rover going to get some food, be back in ~30 min | 14:02 | |
zbr | anyone accepting bribes for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-role-collect-logs/+/796278 ? | 14:13 |
arxcruz | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-repos/+/794801 | 14:19 |
weshay|ruck | ysandeep, you should be on this call https://meet.google.com/gmj-aacx-hmy?authuser=1 | 14:24 |
weshay|ruck | re: tripleo-repos | 14:25 |
weshay|ruck | rlandy, fyi ^ | 14:25 |
weshay|ruck | ua | 14:25 |
ysandeep | weshay|ruck, joining | 14:25 |
arxcruz | https://docs.openstack.org/cliff/latest/user/demoapp.html | 14:25 |
arxcruz | weshay|ruck: dviroel marios|call chandankumar | 14:26 |
* anbanerj|rover is back | 14:39 | |
ysandeep | weshay|ruck, do you mind staying back on call afterwards, want to chat | 14:43 |
*** marios|call is now known as marios|ruck | 14:44 | |
rlandy | marios|ruck: anbanerj|rover: meet in 15 mins? | 14:45 |
rlandy | re: train/master components | 14:45 |
anbanerj|rover | sure | 14:45 |
rlandy | thanks | 14:45 |
marios|ruck | rlandy: yes | 14:45 |
marios|ruck | rlandy: anbanerj|rover: https://meet.google.com/nxp-nwiq-sww ? | 15:01 |
marios|ruck | or we have a room already? | 15:01 |
rlandy | joining | 15:01 |
ysandeep | zbr++ thanks for reaching out to migi | 15:10 |
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away | 15:10 | |
anbanerj|rover | updated https://trello.com/c/mU1qeAkG/1996-cixlp1881087tripleociproa-tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario010-standalone-timing-out-frequently | 15:16 |
weshay|ruck | akahat, bhagyashris ok to merge https://review.rdoproject.org/r/c/rdo-infra/ci-config/+/34196 ?? ruck rovers fyi.. marios|ruck anbanerj|rover | 15:22 |
anbanerj|rover | marios|ruck, rlandy these ones https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?job_name=periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario010-standalone-train&job_name=periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario010-ovn-provider-standalone-train&job_name=periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario010-standalone-master&job_name=periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario010-standalone-ussuri&job_name=periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario010-standalone-victoria | 15:22 |
akahat | weshay|ruck, with this patch we don't have any promotion yet. okay to merge it will work. | 15:23 |
ysandeep | rlandy, weshay|ruck fyi.. about dual voting https://projects.engineering.redhat.com/browse/RHOSZUUL-488 | 15:24 |
weshay|ruck | akahat, let's let the current ruck / rovers weigh in.. prior to merge.. | 15:25 |
weshay|ruck | it impacts them quite a bit | 15:25 |
rlandy | ysandeep: k - at least they know about it | 15:25 |
akahat | sure | 15:26 |
weshay|ruck | anbanerj|rover, did your octavia debug.. end up w/ an existing cix or new? | 15:27 |
anbanerj|rover | weshay|ruck, the same one https://trello.com/c/mU1qeAkG/1996-cixlp1881087tripleociproa-tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario010-standalone-timing-out-frequently | 15:28 |
sshnaidm | anbanerj|rover, marios|ruck do we have any bug about test_minimum_basic_scenario failures? | 15:28 |
anbanerj|rover | It is happening for tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario010-standalone, tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario010-ovn-provider-standalone-train and periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario010-standalone-train | 15:28 |
weshay|ruck | k.. and this is the patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/networking-ovn/+/796517 looks like | 15:28 |
anbanerj|rover | sshnaidm, no, I checked it failed only twice I think | 15:28 |
weshay|ruck | so it was that import issue we found.. I think iirc | 15:29 |
sshnaidm | anbanerj|rover, it fails quite more: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-osa&project=openstack/ansible-collections-openstack | 15:29 |
sshnaidm | can we disable it until it's fixed? | 15:30 |
marios|ruck | sshnaidm: i think we had a bug last week that caused us to add those to the skip list .. sec lemme see if i can fine | 15:30 |
anbanerj|rover | weshay|ruck, the hashring patch is the one which merged yesterday right? That didnt fix it. I cant see the hashring error yet , now it is WARN|Bridge 'br-tenant' not found for network 'tenant' | 15:30 |
anbanerj|rover | sshnaidm, ah ok, lemme check if there is an existing bug, else I'll create | 15:30 |
marios|ruck | sshnaidm: anbanerj|rover: we can't add to skips or it makes some periodics fail like fs2 see https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-tempest-skiplist/+/795742 | 15:31 |
marios|ruck | sshnaidm: anbanerj|rover: because for some jobs it is the only thing that runs | 15:31 |
marios|ruck | i think arxcruz was working on a fix for this problem though fyi sshnaidm | 15:31 |
marios|ruck | but if we are seeing it very often then we should have a bug for this | 15:32 |
chandankumar | see ya tomorrow | 15:32 |
marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: can you please add this to your list to file a tracker | 15:33 |
marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: ah you said it only failed 2x? | 15:33 |
marios|ruck | sshnaidm: ?? are you seeing it lots? | 15:33 |
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|out | 15:33 | |
* ysandeep|out Singing off for the day, see you tomorrow o/ | 15:34 | |
sshnaidm | marios|ruck, yes, https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-osa&project=openstack/ansible-collections-openstack | 15:34 |
sshnaidm | like 30% jobs failures | 15:35 |
sshnaidm | or even more | 15:35 |
sshnaidm | maybe we can change to other, more stable test? | 15:35 |
marios|ruck | sshnaidm: are we seeing it in the 'normal' standalone i wonder i don't know what that -osa one is about | 15:36 |
sshnaidm | marios|ruck, it's normal standalone | 15:36 |
marios|ruck | sshnaidm: k i can file a bug for that but likely tomorrow at this rate | 15:36 |
marios|ruck | sshnaidm: so then we should also be seeing this in centos8-standalone job | 15:36 |
marios|ruck | sshnaidm: but doesn't look like https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone | 15:37 |
marios|ruck | maybe this is what anbanerj|rover was refering to when she said 18:28 < anbanerj|rover> sshnaidm, no, I checked it failed only twice I think | 15:37 |
anbanerj|rover | marios|ruck, I checked it in openstack health dashboard, lemme find the link | 15:37 |
sshnaidm | the only difference is that this job builds containers, doesn't use content provider: https://opendev.org/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/src/branch/master/.zuul.yaml#L311-L316 | 15:40 |
sshnaidm | but it fails in tempest, so I don't think it's realted | 15:40 |
sshnaidm | *related | 15:40 |
weshay|ruck | zbr, do you know what "lost" now means in zuul status? | 16:15 |
weshay|ruck | marios|ruck, anbanerj|rover big gate reset on ^ .. no action required | 16:15 |
*** sshnaidm is now known as sshnaidm|afk | 16:16 | |
weshay|ruck | guess.. lost = NOT WINNING... | 16:16 |
marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: gate reset on what? fyi we did an explicit abandon earlier on a stuck patch in gate holding up the queue | 16:18 |
marios|ruck | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/puppet-tripleo/+/796567/1#message-a6064747be418ea14d194d8460951454dc829c89 | 16:18 |
marios|ruck | was a shame cos it was the top patch and there were many green ones under it waiting to merge :/ | 16:19 |
weshay|ruck | ah.. that's now the third time.. we've seen a job holding the entire line | 16:19 |
weshay|ruck | marios|ruck, zbr https://zuul.openstack.org/status#795889 | 16:19 |
anbanerj|rover | marios|ruck, sshnaidm|afk http://status.openstack.org/openstack-health/#/test/tempest.scenario.test_minimum_basic.TestMinimumBasicScenario.test_minimum_basic_scenario Should I create a bug for TestMinimumBasicScenario.test_minimum_basic_scenario? | 16:19 |
weshay|ruck | see "lost" | 16:19 |
marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: anbanerj|rover: me getting out of here in a few mins | 16:20 |
weshay|ruck | probably lost networking | 16:20 |
marios|ruck | will pick it up in the morning | 16:20 |
weshay|ruck | not asking for action.. just FYI.. | 16:20 |
marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: yes i think we need one please at least point to the jobs sshnaidm|afk was referring to | 16:20 |
marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-osa&project=openstack/ansible-collections-openstack that one | 16:20 |
marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: we aren't seeing it that often on the normal standalone | 16:20 |
marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: ack thanks, but also good to know "that's the third time" so perhaps points to some ongoing infra issue now and reset the gate costs a lot of time/resources so really bad | 16:21 |
anbanerj|rover | marios|ruck, ok, I'll create, The job is failing quite many times, but the dashboard showed only 3 failures a day. Lemme check the jobs. | 16:21 |
marios|ruck | we should probably file something if it continues | 16:21 |
weshay|ruck | marios|ruck, ya.. infra was debugging stuck jobs last week.. haven't heard anything since | 16:22 |
marios|ruck | anbanerj|rover: please bear in mind/note on the bug that 18:31 < marios|ruck> sshnaidm: anbanerj|rover: we can't add to skips or it makes some periodics fail like fs2 see https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-tempest-skiplist/+/795742 | 16:23 |
*** marios|ruck is now known as marios|out | 16:28 | |
anbanerj|rover | sshnaidm|afk, https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1932344 - for minimum basic | 16:35 |
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 16:35 | |
weshay|ruck | anbanerj|rover, I think it's failing in more places than that | 16:36 |
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off | 16:36 | |
weshay|ruck | anbanerj|rover, /me notes I don't have any proof of that right now | 16:37 |
zbr | wow. first time i see the "lost" status on zuul, i guess is some kind of "gone" | 16:37 |
weshay|ruck | well.. here's one https://storage.bhs.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_2af/795025/5/gate/tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-tv-validation/2afcec6/logs/undercloud/var/log/tempest/stestr_results.html | 16:37 |
anbanerj|rover | weshay|ruck, yes, just checked http://status.openstack.org/openstack-health/#/test/tempest.scenario.test_minimum_basic.TestMinimumBasicScenario.test_minimum_basic_scenario | 16:38 |
anbanerj|rover | updating the bug | 16:38 |
weshay|ruck | zbr, "out-to-lunch" would have been better | 16:38 |
* zbr thinks that even zuul needs to eat | 16:38 | |
weshay|ruck | anbanerj|rover, we'll need more debug on that lp | 16:38 |
anbanerj|rover | weshay|ruck, apparently 'br-tenant' not found for network 'tenant' warning is there in all logs, not specific to octavia issue - just found out | 16:47 |
weshay|ruck | ya.. but the import error? | 16:48 |
anbanerj|rover | oslo ? ModuleLoader: module 'oslo' has unresolved dependencies in in only some of the jobs | 16:49 |
anbanerj|rover | weshay|ruck, I couldnt find anything in the neutron logs for https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1932344 . I'll look again tomorrow | 16:55 |
*** dviroel is now known as dviroel|away | 18:05 | |
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|brb | 18:34 | |
*** rlandy|brb is now known as rlandy | 18:50 | |
*** dviroel|away is now known as dviroel | 18:53 | |
rlandy | periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-multinode-1ctlr-featureset010-rhos-17 SUCCESS | 18:53 |
rlandy | looky here | 18:53 |
weshay|ruck | ah nice | 18:56 |
weshay|ruck | rlandy, where's the upstream patch.. I see some DNM patches | 18:58 |
rlandy | weshay|ruck: change to fs010 | 18:59 |
rlandy | see alex's comments | 18:59 |
rlandy | <mwhahaha> https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/777108/31/config/general_config/featureset010.yml | 18:59 |
rlandy | <mwhahaha> needed to exclude wallaby for now | 18:59 |
rlandy | <mwhahaha> if it's a problem | 18:59 |
rlandy | idk if we want to leave upstream and just do this downstream | 19:00 |
rlandy | to get the lines moving | 19:00 |
rlandy | weshay|ruck: also I reran BM on 16.2 https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/zuul/t/tripleo-ci-internal/stream/5ae19862487045b3a35b9d5dbc500384?logfile=console.log | 19:00 |
rlandy | hopefully better | 19:00 |
rlandy | the change is in quickstart | 19:01 |
weshay|ruck | ya.. that looked like ephemeral heat.. that issue.. | 19:02 |
rlandy | weshay|ruck: so ... | 19:05 |
rlandy | <mwhahaha> but yes, quickstart will likely need to pass in the --heat-container-* stuff for testing unless we fix the whole container image prepare value conversation from earli | 19:06 |
rlandy | we will need to pass the right containers | 19:06 |
rlandy | BUT those options are only currently available in master | 19:06 |
rlandy | not wallaby | 19:06 |
rlandy | so I can try override the fs | 19:07 |
weshay|ruck | rlandy, ya.. but slagle is making changes | 19:07 |
rlandy | in downstream only | 19:07 |
rlandy | or we can accept this upstream as well | 19:07 |
weshay|ruck | rlandy, wait for it in wallaby | 19:08 |
weshay|ruck | if james hasn't merged all the changes in wallaby yet.. then put in wallaby as an exception https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/777108/31/config/general_config/featureset010.yml | 19:09 |
weshay|ruck | here | 19:09 |
rlandy | weshay|ruck: wrt 16.2 integration line ... | 19:10 |
rlandy | https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/logs/openstack-periodic-integration-rhos-16.2/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-ovb-1ctlr_2comp-featureset020-internal-rhos-16.2/fc7cdd1/logs/undercloud/var/log/tempest/stestr_results.html.gz | 19:10 |
rlandy | passed all except one test | 19:10 |
weshay|ruck | rlandy, https://review.opendev.org/q/owner:jslagle%2540redhat.com+branch:stable/wallaby | 19:10 |
rlandy | BM is still running | 19:10 |
rlandy | the rest is ok | 19:10 |
rlandy | fs001 OVB still running | 19:10 |
weshay|ruck | rlandy, this is wrong https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/+/777108/31/config/general_config/featureset010.yml | 19:10 |
rlandy | that hash has the network/octavia fix | 19:10 |
rlandy | weshay|ruck: leaving for dentist in 20 mins | 19:10 |
weshay|ruck | k | 19:11 |
rlandy | weshay|ruck: can you ping jason | 19:11 |
rlandy | and promote this hash if BM passes | 19:11 |
rlandy | or fs001 OVB | 19:11 |
rlandy | I don't want to miss promoting this last fix out | 19:12 |
rlandy | periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-scenario010-standalone-rhos-16.2success (non-voting) | 19:12 |
rlandy | it will still need to go through the expection process but at least it will clear our systems | 19:12 |
weshay|ruck | sure | 19:13 |
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|afk | 19:28 | |
weshay|ruck | rlandy|afk, ok.. fs001 passed https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/logs/openstack-periodic-integration-rhos-16.2/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-internal-rhos-16.2/798e8ba/logs/undercloud/var/log/tempest/ | 19:55 |
weshay|ruck | promoting 16.2 | 19:55 |
weshay|ruck | anbanerj|rover, https://dd999f0369b1130d2940-a00e37315b6784119b950c4b112ef30c.ssl.cf1.rackcdn.com/796729/1/gate/tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-upgrade-victoria/b2314f7/logs/undercloud/var/log/tempest/stestr_results.html | 21:03 |
*** rlandy|afk is now known as rlandy | 21:30 | |
rlandy | weshay|ruck: thank you | 21:31 |
arxcruz | weshay|ruck: rlandy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-tempest-skiplist/+/796956 | 22:06 |
arxcruz | just notice failing due uper constraint | 22:06 |
weshay|ruck | arxcruz, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-tempest-skiplist/+/796954/3/requirements.txt | 22:11 |
weshay|ruck | bah | 22:11 |
weshay|ruck | who was first | 22:11 |
* weshay|ruck by one minute :P | 22:11 | |
weshay|ruck | arxcruz, thanks for putting this up https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/+/796818 | 22:13 |
weshay|ruck | let's kill that dragon | 22:13 |
arxcruz | masd | 22:13 |
weshay|ruck | arxcruz, ya.. I wonder if an easier approach... after reading comments | 22:14 |
weshay|ruck | if it's too late I'll shut up | 22:14 |
weshay|ruck | can we just hardcode keystone into python-tempest conf to always run? | 22:15 |
arxcruz | weshay|ruck: they gave a good option | 22:16 |
arxcruz | if there's an variable set with a tempest test, just merge with the included list | 22:16 |
arxcruz | weshay|ruck:i'll work on that tomorrow | 22:16 |
weshay|ruck | arxcruz, thanks!!! | 22:17 |
rlandy | periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-bm_envD-3ctlr_1comp-featureset035-rhos-16.2testprojectmastercheck189440,109 | 22:21 |
rlandy | 4 hrs 46 mins 44 secs2021-06-17 17:09:42SUCCESS | 22:21 |
rlandy | good | 22:21 |
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|bbl | 22:29 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!