Tuesday, 2021-02-23

*** jmasud has quit IRC00:01
*** jmasud has joined #oooq00:22
*** tosky has quit IRC00:38
rlandyweshay|ruck: frenzy_friday: stream looking good01:10
*** ysandeep|away is now known as ysandeep|ruck01:14
ysandeep|ruckrlandy, weshay|ruck hey o/ anything you want me to pick up?01:14
ysandeep|ruckrlandy, thanks for https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/776692 , looks good01:14
rlandyysandeep|ruck: weshay|ruck: 17 is looking good minus ipa - I have a fix for that01:14
rlandyysandeep|ruck: yep - that can go01:15
rlandyysandeep|ruck: ovb is failing on deploy - no available host01:16
rlandypossible that the 8.4 image is bigger01:16
rlandywill have to look into that01:16
ysandeep|ruck17 is missing some component jobs, i will add them today..01:16
rlandylast 16.2 failure is multinode ...01:16
rlandyit's failing on update - that should not be running01:17
rlandy2021-02-21 03:08:43.770745 | primary | TASK [build-test-packages : gather facts used by role] *************************01:17
rlandy2021-02-21 03:08:43.770777 | primary | Sunday 21 February 2021  03:08:43 +0000 (0:00:00.079)       1:33:24.476 *******01:17
rlandy2021-02-21 03:09:27.893974 | primary | fatal: [subnode-1]: UNREACHABLE! => {01:17
rlandy2021-02-21 03:09:27.894065 | primary |     "changed": false,01:17
rlandy2021-02-21 03:09:27.894075 | primary |     "unreachable": true01:17
rlandy2021-02-21 03:09:27.894083 | primary | }01:17
rlandyalthough it was running and passing before01:17
rlandyand is passing in rdo01:17
rlandybut never the less it shouldn't run01:18
* ysandeep|ruck looking into multinode01:18
rlandyI tried remove-tags but it didn't help01:18
rlandyysandeep|ruck: the issue started I think when we used one playbook for multinode01:18
rlandyhttps://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/src/branch/master/roles/build-test-packages/tasks/main.yml#L401:18
rlandy^^ failure is there01:19
rlandybut build-test packages should not be running01:19
rlandyysandeep|ruck: stream 8 is also looking promising01:21
rlandywill discuss more about that tomorrow01:21
ysandeep|ruck with 8.3 - build-test package was running okay earlier on 8.301:23
rlandyysandeep|ruck: ack - it was01:24
*** jmasud has quit IRC01:24
rlandyysandeep|ruck: but this is a diff problem ..01:26
rlandywe should not run this playbook at all01:26
rlandyhttps://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/src/branch/master/playbooks/multinode-undercloud-upgrade.yml#L2201:26
rlandy^^ not an upgrade job01:26
rlandywe're running tags all01:26
rlandyysandeep|ruck: anyways - need to step away ... will be back in my morning ...01:27
ysandeep|ruckrlandy, i will check this o/ have a great evening01:27
rlandytried to get stream going today so didn't have a ton of time to look at 16.201:27
rlandybut we're basically at deploy with ovb and this problem with multinode01:28
*** rlandy has quit IRC01:28
*** jmasud has joined #oooq01:32
weshay|ruckysandeep|ruck, any bm jobs yet on 17?01:41
ysandeep|ruckweshay|ruck, On friday, they are failing on image build.. i will relook today01:44
ysandeep|ruckwere*01:44
weshay|ruckk.. ysandeep|ruck both image build jobs passed in the line01:44
ysandeep|ruckweshay|ruck, aye i will try getting a pass in integration line first , i was checking status of component line bm jobs, https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/logs/openstack-component-tripleo/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-bm_envE-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-tripleo-rhos-17/17b0839/job-output.txt01:46
weshay|ruckysandeep|ruck, k.. will look ... I'm going to promote-17 but note it's w/o a full deployment01:47
weshay|ruckone step closer :)01:47
ysandeep|ruckweshay|ruck, patch is up to add 17 https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/228720/ .. we can merge this today if we get a green run.02:01
ysandeep|ruckweshay|ruck, fyi.. we are reusing envA - we might need to adjust the timing of baremetal line trigger so that.. integration 17 line run vs baretal line don't conflicts.. i will work on that02:03
ysandeep|ruckweshay|ruck, could you please review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/+/77669202:08
weshay|rucklooking02:09
weshay|ruckysandeep|ruck, wf02:15
*** ysandeep|ruck has quit IRC02:18
*** ysandeep has joined #oooq02:19
weshay|ruckysandeep, need anything else?02:19
*** jmasud has quit IRC02:19
ysandeepweshay|ruck, stein is still not fixed.. i will check with arxcruz02:20
ysandeepAfter your repush - https://quay.io/repository/tripleostein/centos-binary-aodh-api?tab=tags - Containers with suffix x86_64 is available but we are still missing containers without x86_64 suffix.02:20
ysandeep~~~02:20
ysandeepdb93471c423322fc24743db3545da0a11b073599_a1cf5a25_x86_6402:20
ysandeep~~~02:20
ysandeeparxcruz, ^^02:20
weshay|ruckk..02:21
weshay|ruck:(02:21
weshay|ruckysandeep, can you ask chandankumar about the retry across registries02:21
ysandeepweshay|ruck, yes, i will chat with him today.02:21
weshay|ruckrock on..02:23
weshay|ruckysandeep++ take care02:23
weshay|ruck0/02:23
ysandeepo/ have a great evening02:23
*** jmasud has joined #oooq02:38
*** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|away02:48
*** jmasud has quit IRC03:24
*** udesale has joined #oooq04:08
*** ysandeep|away is now known as ysandeep|ruck04:27
*** jmasud has joined #oooq04:33
*** ykarel has joined #oooq04:36
*** ratailor has joined #oooq04:46
*** saneax has joined #oooq04:51
*** saneax has quit IRC04:52
*** jmasud has quit IRC05:08
*** saneax has joined #oooq05:10
*** jmasud has joined #oooq05:29
*** marios has joined #oooq06:00
*** sanjayu_ has joined #oooq06:00
*** saneax has quit IRC06:03
*** udesale_ has joined #oooq06:08
*** udesale has quit IRC06:11
*** slaweq_ has joined #oooq06:50
*** udesale__ has joined #oooq07:26
*** jpodivin has quit IRC07:29
*** udesale_ has quit IRC07:30
*** jpodivin has joined #oooq07:30
*** ysandeep|ruck is now known as ysandeep|lunch07:35
*** udesale__ has quit IRC08:00
*** jmasud has quit IRC08:01
*** ykarel_ has joined #oooq08:31
*** ykarel has quit IRC08:33
*** jlarriba has joined #oooq08:34
*** ysandeep|lunch is now known as ysandeep|ruck08:39
*** jlarriba has quit IRC08:48
*** tosky has joined #oooq08:50
*** jlarriba has joined #oooq08:51
arxcruzysandeep|ruck: the containers on centos 7 have only the x86_64 sufix08:53
arxcruzthere's no one without, I can do a workaround though08:53
ysandeep|ruckarxcruz, checking container build logs08:55
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena08:58
ysandeep|ruckhmm.. we don't have report.html for older releases08:58
ysandeep|ruckarxcruz, rdo registry have both the containers with/without x86_64 sufix09:01
ysandeep|ruckhttps://trunk.registry.rdoproject.org:8443/oapi/v1/namespaces/tripleostein/imagestreamtags/09:01
ysandeep|ruckname": "centos-binary-aodh-api:db93471c423322fc24743db3545da0a11b073599_a1cf5a25",09:01
ysandeep|ruck"name": "centos-binary-aodh-api:db93471c423322fc24743db3545da0a11b073599_a1cf5a25_x86_64"09:01
*** udesale has joined #oooq09:06
arxcruzysandeep|ruck: yeah, but, in the job, it only shows up the x86409:14
arxcruzysandeep|ruck: https://logserver.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic-integration-stable3-centos7/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-centos-7-train-containers-build-push/076c28e/job-output.txt09:15
arxcruz2021-02-20 11:06:44.465697 | primary | 09d228d73c4afb12fb9f85e0367086fdf8c0ddfb_effdb661_x86_64: digest: sha256:6dfbd1a2cb32f8511c23363d3b26cf667de66eb914ab9f70419154a7f250408e size: 657409:15
arxcruz2021-02-20 11:06:44.513576 |09:15
arxcruz2021-02-20 11:06:44.513789 | LOOP [build-containers : Tag w/ arch suffix and push image: trunk.registry.rdoproject.org/tripleotrain/centos-binary-nova-compute]09:15
ysandeep|ruck^^ train09:16
*** udesale has quit IRC09:17
ysandeep|ruckarxcruz, stein logs: https://logserver.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic-integration-stable4-5/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-stein/9aa1c86/job-output.txt09:18
arxcruzysandeep|ruck: ?09:18
arxcruzysandeep|ruck: doesn't matter, here's stein logs https://logserver.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic-integration-stable4-5/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-centos-7-stein-containers-build-push/6f2085c/job-output.txt09:19
arxcruzsame thing09:19
ysandeep|ruckarxcruz, i found some difference between last execution vs older execution - https://logserver.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic-integration-stable4-5/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-centos-7-stein-containers-build-push/d3c219a/job-output.txt  - search for TASK [build-containers : Get actual built containers]09:24
ysandeep|ruck^^ this task was skipped in last execution.09:25
arxcruzysandeep|ruck: aha!09:25
arxcruzyou're right09:25
arxcruzand only output is from the x86)6409:26
arxcruzwondering now why it was skipped09:26
arxcruzysandeep|ruck: the task doesn't have any condition to be skipped09:30
arxcruzhttps://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/src/branch/master/roles/build-containers/tasks/build-report.yaml#L5709:30
*** skramaja has joined #oooq09:34
*** slaweq_ is now known as slaweq09:40
ysandeep|ruckarxcruz, correct.. wondering if https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-ci/commit/a3c9dc40e48637fcc1b0f847cc7a506b23e8dd44 is somehow related .. that's the only change in the file..09:41
* ysandeep|ruck thinks container without x86 suffix is also creating properly .. because we can see them in rdo09:47
arxcruzysandeep|ruck: aha, we can blame ykarel_ https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/commit/3b387897994ee9ba02d467b1ff73251e188cdd2909:47
ysandeep|ruckarxcruz++ yeah looks like this broke the reporting for c7 container build09:50
*** derekh has joined #oooq09:51
*** udesale has joined #oooq09:53
arxcruzysandeep|ruck: i think the logic is correct, that report should never be executed because it's kolla09:53
arxcruzbut we can add on this post the same task just to show's up the containers09:53
arxcruzbecause it's all we need09:53
arxcruzysandeep|ruck: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/77708409:58
arxcruzysandeep|ruck: is it safe to run the periodic-tripleo-centos-7-stein-containers-build-push with a depends-on ?09:59
ysandeep|ruckarxcruz, yes.. tripleo-ci-testing is same09:59
arxcruzysandeep|ruck: ack09:59
ysandeep|ruckarxcruz, even docker have the same hash container without x86 suffix.. wondering how it worked for docker?10:01
ysandeep|ruck~~~[root@undercloud ~]# podman pull docker.io/tripleostein/centos-binary-nova-api:db93471c423322fc24743db3545da0a11b073599_a1cf5a2510:01
ysandeep|ruckTrying to pull docker.io/tripleostein/centos-binary-nova-api:db93471c423322fc24743db3545da0a11b073599_a1cf5a25...10:01
ysandeep|ruckGetting image source signatures10:01
ysandeep|ruck...10:01
ysandeep|ruckStoring signatures10:01
ysandeep|ruck80039942fd0f9acbe104b487c8313c4ca92e513e28c1077485f37ee72bd8a7a210:01
arxcruzysandeep|ruck: centos-8 have a very nice report10:02
arxcruzwith both hashes10:02
arxcruzysandeep|ruck: http://logserver.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic-integration-stable1/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-build-containers-ubi-8-push-victoria/d860331/logs/containers-built.log for example10:03
ysandeep|ruckyup, earlier same thing was getting captured for c7 stein too - https://logserver.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic-integration-stable4-5/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-centos-7-stein-containers-build-push/d3c219a/logs/containers-built.log10:05
*** udesale has quit IRC10:05
ysandeep|ruckarxcruz, apart from this weshay|ruck want us to discuss with chandankumar, if we can configure failover of registries for these older branches..10:05
arxcruzok...10:05
*** jmasud has joined #oooq10:16
*** ykarel_ is now known as ykarel10:20
chandankumarysandeep|ruck: you mean fallback for c7 containers registeries?10:23
ysandeep|ruckchandankumar, yes10:24
ykarelysandeep|ruck, arxcruz what's this issue with build-report disable patch?10:51
ykarelis it still not getting disabled?10:52
arxcruzykarel: it is10:52
arxcruzykarel: the problem is that our tool to copy containers to quay, was using that report to parse the list of containers10:52
ykarelahh10:53
ykarelso u collect that report from logs and then push10:54
arxcruzykarel: yup10:55
ykarelarxcruz, is this same happens while pushing to docker.io?10:55
arxcruzykarel: nope, just quay10:55
ykareland why not using same methods(to collect container images list) as push to docker.io10:55
ykareli think it's better to do the same while doing promotions itself10:56
ykarelalong with push to docker.io10:56
*** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur11:03
ysandeep|ruckykarel, +1 to idea of using same method for docker and quay. arxcruz chandankumar ^^11:06
arxcruzysandeep|ruck: can you show me where it is?11:06
ysandeep|ruckarxcruz,  from logs http://38.102.83.109/promoter_logs/centos7_stein.log-20200721 looks like pushing containers to docker is part of promotion process.11:11
arxcruzysandeep|ruck: hmmmm i need to check, the tool is already done to get the latest success job from zuul11:12
arxcruznot of checks11:12
ysandeep|ruckwhere that tool resides - tox-box vm?11:14
ykarelysandeep|ruck, arxcruz it's in https://github.com/rdo-infra/ci-config/blob/master/ci-scripts/dlrnapi_promoter/repo_client.py#L9211:17
arxcruzysandeep|ruck: yes, in toolbox vm11:18
arxcruzykarel: ysandeep|ruck it's written in go ;)11:18
arxcruzi can work on consume dlrnapi instead of zuul log11:19
ykarelpromoter uses tripleo-common  source to fetch containers list11:20
*** apetrich has quit IRC11:47
*** apetrich has joined #oooq11:48
*** jlarriba has quit IRC11:50
*** jlarriba has joined #oooq11:52
*** skramaja has quit IRC11:59
*** ratailor has quit IRC12:04
*** chem has joined #oooq12:15
*** apetrich has quit IRC12:24
*** jmasud has quit IRC12:26
*** rlandy has joined #oooq12:29
chandankumarmarios: o/ need some help on fixing tox -e docs issue https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-specs/+/772442 - https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/925f0081e4d745a08a14cd8365ad1c1e please have a look when free, thanks !12:30
*** jpena is now known as jpena|lunch12:30
rlandyysandeep|ruck: hey - any progress with ovb or multinode on 16.2? if not, no worries, I'll look at it again after training class12:31
marioschandankumar: looking12:32
rlandymarios: hi - is there a reason that fs010 multinode runs the update playbooks?12:32
mariosrlandy: o/ what is that job even? have to dig there i am not familiar with it12:33
*** apetrich has joined #oooq12:33
rlandymarios: posting links ...12:33
ysandeep|ruckrlandy, with multinode i agree with that task should not run, that's because we moved everything to multinode.yml and this task run on build tag12:34
ysandeep|ruckhttps://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/src/branch/master/playbooks/multinode-overcloud-upgrade.yml#L2612:34
mariosrlandy: are you referring to tripleo-ci-centos-8-containers-multinode12:34
rlandyysandeep|ruck: ^^ ack - talking with marios about that now12:34
rlandyjust making sure before I get rid of it12:34
rlandymarios: https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/logs/openstack-periodic-integration-rhos-16.2/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-multinode-1ctlr-featureset010-rhos-16.2/9cbcbba/job-output.txt12:34
mariosrlandy: k but gimme sec looking at sthing else first for chandankumar12:34
rlandymarios: no rush - just posting evidence12:35
rlandy2021-02-23 02:23:39.699794 | primary | PLAY [Build the gerrit changes on the relevant release for the upgrade] ********12:35
rlandy2021-02-23 02:23:39.722778 | primary |12:35
rlandy2021-02-23 02:23:39.722814 | primary | TASK [build-test-packages : gather facts used by role] *************************12:35
rlandy2021-02-23 02:23:39.722821 | primary | Tuesday 23 February 2021  02:23:39 +0000 (0:00:00.060)       1:13:36.711 ******12:35
rlandy^^ fails on an update task12:35
rlandyit should not be running iiuc,12:35
mariosrlandy: well it should not be so i'm guessing we have a conditional wrong somewhere but will dig in a bit12:35
rlandyI think this issue started with the multinode.yaml (one shot playbook)12:35
mariosrlandy: yes12:35
rlandywe run tags all12:36
ysandeep|ruckhttps://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/src/branch/master/playbooks/multinode-overcloud-upgrade.yml#L26 - build tag12:36
mariosrlandy: i saw that in the zuul.d/multinode definition of it with 401       playbooks:$12:36
marios402         - multinode.yml$12:36
mariosi.e. all the playbooks in multinode.yml12:36
rlandyysandeep|ruck: ack - we can't get rid of the build tag in total12:36
rlandywe need to switch case that playbook better12:36
rlandyall of them12:36
mariosrlandy: well they rely on things set in the featureset sec lemme fetch pointer12:37
mariosrlandy: e.g. 401       playbooks:$12:37
rlandymarios: ^^ thanks - that will help set the right conditional for skipping those playbooks12:37
marios402         - multinode.yml$12:37
mariosrlandy: sorry e.g. https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/src/commit/0dbe78b749bcabfe14ed75c49391c84c36c2f80a/playbooks/multinode-overcloud-update.yml#L912:37
mariosrlandy: i.e. that 'overcloud_update' is set on the featureset, when it *is* an update12:38
rlandysomehow this thing is kicking12:38
mariosrlandy: definitely not set in fs10 https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/blob/master/config/general_config/featureset010.yml12:39
rlandymarios: I tried ...12:40
rlandy  remove-tags:  - overcloud-update12:40
rlandydidn't help12:40
rlandythe role is run on  when: overcloud_update|default(false)|bool12:40
rlandybut the failure is in get_facts12:40
* ysandeep|ruck trying to recall a patch where marios and sshnaidm was working.. around multinode.yml 12:40
rlandybefore the role decision is made12:40
rlandymarios: so iiuc, gather_facts will still run and the swit conly happens on the role12:41
mariosrlandy: ah i se12:41
mariosrlandy: yeah so it isn't running the role12:41
mariosrlandy: it is just evaluating the playbook12:42
rlandymarios: we need to when the enire playbook12:42
rlandyyep12:42
mariosrlandy: could split the gather_facts into a conditional task, instead of on the play?12:42
rlandymarios: or move the when up12:44
rlandyif possible12:44
mariosrlandy: yeah but can't cos there is no up i mean it doesn't even have tasks it is all at the play level there12:45
mariosrlandy: so i *think* adding two tasks there, in a block with the when condition12:45
mariosrlandy: one with 'setup' module and the other iwth include_role12:46
rlandymarios: ok - putting in patch for your review12:46
rlandysec12:46
mariosrlandy: but i am not 100% sure if the setup will then be OK, i.e. because it is a task instead of on the play12:46
mariosrlandy: but worth a shot imo12:46
mariosrlandy: otherwise you will have to make the inclusion of the entire playbook conditional i.e. something in multinode.yml12:47
mariosrlandy: but hold no its failing because it can't reach undercloud?12:48
mariosrlandy: 2021-02-23 02:23:39.722814 | primary | TASK [build-test-packages : gather facts used by role] *************************12:48
marios2021-02-23 02:24:23.833610 | primary | fatal: [subnode-1]: UNREACHABLE! => {12:48
rlandymarios: true12:49
rlandybut really it's a different issue12:49
rlandyit will probably fail down the line in tempest12:49
rlandybut the playbook still should not be running12:49
mariosrlandy: so it didn't run the update playbook yet?12:49
rlandymarios: no - but it started the gather_fact from there12:49
mariosrlandy: 2021-02-23 02:24:24.379973 | primary | +(./toci_quickstart.sh:166): main(): echo 'Playbook run of multinode.yml failed'12:49
ysandeep|ruckunable to connect secondary node12:50
mariosrlandy: k i think i follow now... was confused by it failing on build-test-packages12:50
rlandyBuild the gerrit changes on the relevant release for the upgrade12:50
rlandy^^ not needed at all12:50
rlandymarios; you are right - the real problem is that it can't reach the undercloud12:51
mariosrlandy: https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/logs/openstack-periodic-integration-rhos-16.2/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-multinode-1ctlr-featureset010-rhos-16.2/9cbcbba/logs/quickstart_files/playbook_executions.log12:51
mariosrlandy: it hasn't run the update play yet i think12:51
mariosrlandy: see the playbook executions?12:51
mariosrlandy: damnit i keep forgetting they are all in one file12:51
ysandeep|ruckrlandy,  undercloud or secondary node.. ?12:51
mariosrlandy: --skip-tags tripleo-validations,teardown-all          /home/zuul/workspace/.quickstart/playbooks/multinode.yml12:51
rlandysecondary node failure12:52
* rlandy runs again gets on node12:52
rlandyfrenzy_friday: hey - you got a full pass here ... https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/32041/12:53
rlandyhttps://logserver.rdoproject.org/41/32041/5/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-ovb-1ctlr_2comp-featureset020-master/fabdcc6/logs/undercloud/etc/yum.repos.d/quickstart-centos-base.repo.txt.gz12:54
rlandystream - correct12:54
rlandyalso here https://logserver.rdoproject.org/41/32041/5/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-ovb-1ctlr_2comp-featureset020-master/fabdcc6/logs/overcloud-novacompute-1/etc/yum.repos.d/quickstart-centos-base.repo.txt.gz12:54
rlandy2021-02-22 22:26:49.856185 | TASK [get_hash : read md5]12:55
rlandy2021-02-22 22:26:50.879806 | primary | 859a30b5d9a2d95eff1feef91a99a37b12:55
frenzy_fridayrlandy, yep! What next?12:55
rlandyContainerZaqarImage: 192.168.24.1:8787/tripleomaster/openstack-zaqar-wsgi:859a30b5d9a2d95eff1feef91a99a37b-updated-2021022222291312:55
rlandyright containers12:55
rlandyfrenzy_friday: we switch the main line ...12:55
rlandywill discuss at community call12:56
rlandyweshay|ruck: arxcruz: ysandeep|ruck: ^^12:56
rlandyfyi12:56
rlandylooks like we are ready to roll stream12:56
frenzy_fridayCool. I fixed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-ci/+/775429 this one as well, it is passing now12:56
rlandynice12:56
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch13:00
arxcruzysandeep|ruck: https://logserver.rdoproject.org/71/31971/5/check/periodic-tripleo-centos-7-stein-containers-build-push/c490464/job-output.txt it passes and shows up the containers, let's do it for now, then i'll work to collect it from dlrn13:03
ysandeep|ruckarxcruz, ack o/13:03
marioschandankumar: posting a fix sec13:04
chandankumarmarios: thanks!13:04
chandankumarmarios: zbr rlandy https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/32059/ when free, thansk!13:14
weshay|ruckbhagyashris, akahat chandankumar we should remove the docker prune temporarily so we can interate more quickly on the promoter13:17
chandankumarweshay|ruck: ok13:17
akahatweshay|ruck, we might run out of space .13:17
bhagyashrisweshay|ruck, ack13:17
akahatif we are targeting 3-4 releases13:17
weshay|ruckakahat, I think we'll be ok.. we can watch it13:18
akahatweshay|ruck, okay. on it.13:18
weshay|ruckyou folks figure out the overcloud image settings?13:18
weshay|ruckI'd like to see a review w/ the settings in source control13:19
chandankumarweshay|ruck: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/3206913:19
bhagyashrisweshay|ruck, yes13:19
weshay|ruckchandankumar, k.. I think the key is just ~/.ssh/id_rsa13:19
weshay|ruckwill check13:19
weshay|ruckchandankumar, bhagyashris akahat the keys have to be manually added in the setup13:20
weshay|ruckhere's what we have atm13:20
weshay|ruckauthorized_keys  bak  id_rsa  id_rsa-blah  id_rsa-old  id_rsa.pub  id_rsa_uploader  known_hosts13:20
weshay|ruck:)13:20
chandankumarweshay|ruck: in old c8 promoter, we have a seperate key for uploader13:20
chandankumarI copied it from there to new one13:20
weshay|ruckchandankumar, don't see it on the promoter user13:21
weshay|ruckoh..13:21
weshay|rucknow I do13:21
weshay|ruckchandankumar, what's the public key for id_rsa_uploader?13:21
* weshay|ruck creates one13:21
bhagyashrisarxcruz, zbr, sshnaidm, rlandy, marios, ysandeep|ruck , bhagyashris, svyas, soniya29, pojadhav, akahat, weshay|ruck , chandankumar, frenzy_friday13:21
chandankumarweshay|ruck: no idea, but it matches which the key present on infra doc13:21
weshay|ruckchandankumar, or I guess we can just test the sftp connection13:21
bhagyashrisCommunity call in 9 min13:22
bhagyashrishttps://hackmd.io/MMg4WDbYSqOQUhU2Kj8zNg?both#2021-02-23-Community-call13:22
weshay|ruckchandankumar++13:22
bhagyashrishttps://meet.google.com/bqx-xwht-wky?authuser=013:22
weshay|ruckthat key works fine13:22
chandankumarakahat++ bhagyashris++ for promoter work13:23
weshay|ruckI can't get a tmux session attached13:24
weshay|ruckit just hangs13:24
weshay|ruckperhaps we can kill all the sessions?13:24
weshay|ruckand start over?13:24
bhagyashrisweshay|ruck, yes, same i am facing13:24
weshay|ruckakahat, chandankumar can I kill tmux?13:25
chandankumarweshay|ruck: yes go ahead13:25
weshay|ruckk.. it's working now13:26
akahatchandankumar, yes13:27
chandankumarweshay|ruck: rlandy: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tripleo-specs/+/777101/113:28
chandankumarmarios: rlandy weshay|ruck sshnaidm moved cli design here https://storage.bhs.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_ea5/772442/18/check/openstack-tox-docs/ea503d9/docs/specs/wallaby/tripleo-repos-single-source.html#cli-design13:29
* akahat thinking container images can get removed by container-push role and again get pulled, there is no effect of "docker system prune"13:33
*** jpena|lunch is now known as jpena13:33
chandankumarakahat: you are correct13:33
weshay|ruckchandankumar, added Alex's notes to line 74 on https://hackmd.io/v2jCX9RwSeuP8EEFDHRa8g13:57
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|training13:57
*** jlarriba has quit IRC14:02
*** jlarriba has joined #oooq14:03
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej14:05
*** udesale has joined #oooq14:07
arxcruzbrb 30 min14:12
chandankumarysandeep|ruck: I need to move https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/src/branch/master/roles/container-build/tasks/non_tripleo_containers.yml for this for c7 roles some where here https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/src/branch/master/roles/build-containers/tasks/provider_push.yaml14:21
ysandeep|ruckchandankumar, ack14:22
bhagyashrisweshay|ruck, here we are using stage_root config https://github.com/rdo-infra/ci-config/blob/master/ci-scripts/dlrnapi_promoter/qcow_client.py#L7914:25
bhagyashristhats why i changed the value here https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/32069/5/ci-scripts/dlrnapi_promoter/config_environments/rdo/defaults.yaml@1614:26
weshay|ruckbhagyashris, akahat I have a quick 1-1 . .then we should sync14:27
bhagyashrisweshay|ruck, ack14:27
akahatweshay|ruck, okay14:27
weshay|ruckbhagyashris, akahat https://meet.google.com/dkj-vuij-yup14:41
weshay|ruckchandankumar, talking about the promoter ^14:41
weshay|ruckif you want to join.. no requirement14:41
akahatweshay|ruck, http://10.0.148.74/promoter_logs/centos8_victoria.log search for "toomanyrequests"14:46
*** ysandeep|ruck is now known as ysandeep|dinner14:51
akahatweshay|ruck, https://review.rdoproject.org/r/3206914:52
*** ykarel has quit IRC14:59
*** udesale has quit IRC14:59
*** udesale has joined #oooq15:00
rlandy|trainingfrenzy_friday: how long are you still around?15:08
rlandy|trainingfrenzy_friday: ^^ can you put up a change to out the same that is in the testproject into the man line?15:10
rlandy|trainingmain15:10
rlandy|trainingweshay|ruck: ^^ fyi15:11
frenzy_fridayrlandy|training, I'll be on till late today.15:11
rlandy|trainingalso, can you annotate the hackmd a bit more15:11
rlandy|trainingso we can explain what review does what15:11
frenzy_fridayBut we need another testproject with all the jobs running on c8 stream nodes instead of s8 too right?15:11
frenzy_fridayusing the nodeset names from https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/32061/15:13
*** ysandeep|dinner is now known as ysandeep|ruck15:25
bhagyashrisjpena, hi, we are getting unauthorized while doing promotion at the end http://paste.openstack.org/show/802934/15:26
bhagyashrisjpena, we are working with new promoter code15:26
jpenabhagyashris: can you check how you passed the user and password? You have the DLRNAPI_USERNAME and DLRNAPI_PASSWORD environment variables15:28
rlandy|trainingfrenzy_friday: yes - we need both15:29
frenzy_fridayrlandy|training, ok, adding the other one15:32
bhagyashrisweshay|ruck, https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-victoria/current-tripleo/delorean.repo.md515:37
akahatjpena, there was issue in the code.. now it's fixed. we've promoted successfully.15:38
bhagyashrisjpena, thank you :) there was issue in the code thanks :)15:38
akahatyou can see the promoted hash above ^^15:38
jpenanice!15:38
weshay|rucknice.. that looks right15:38
akahatjpena, thank you :)15:38
weshay|ruckbhagyashris, akahat can you please capture the change in a review before taking off?15:39
akahatweshay|ruck, promoting ussuri now.15:39
weshay|ruckarxcruz, ysandeep|ruck ^15:39
akahatweshay|ruck, yup.15:39
bhagyashrisweshay|ruck, yes15:39
weshay|ruckthanks for helping jpena15:40
weshay|ruckoh man..15:40
weshay|ruckit was just the registry info?15:40
weshay|ruckbah15:40
weshay|ruckI should have caught that15:40
weshay|ruckakahat, bhagyashris use the vexhost promoter as a reference please :)15:40
chandankumarweshay|ruck: nope, it was taking wrong password something wrong in the code side15:40
weshay|ruckOH15:40
weshay|ruckk15:40
weshay|ruckbhagyashris, akahat btw.. one great improvement to logs.. would be to include the agg, commit, distro hash in this message 2021-02-23 15:36:38,832 2681321 WARNING  promoter Candidate label 'current-tripleo': NO candidate hash promoted to current-tripleo-rdo15:42
weshay|ruckbhagyashris, akahat perhaps a full summary of the promotion w/ links15:43
weshay|ruckI think you have all that info available15:43
akahatweshay|ruck, okay. I'll note it down.15:43
bhagyashrisweshay|ruck, sure15:43
weshay|ruck++15:43
weshay|ruckchandankumar, akahat bhagyashris fyi.. [08:44:56] <apevec> weshay, sshnaidm - say goodbye to 38.145.34.55 (old promoter-server in rdocloud), shutting it down now!15:45
bhagyashrisweshay|ruck, ussuri promoted https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-ussuri/current-tripleo/delorean.repo.md515:51
weshay|ruckbhagyashris, k.. thanks /me checking it15:51
weshay|ruckcontainers look good15:52
weshay|ruck12591acf172d2cc621866bca77b2b0f815:52
weshay|ruckdocker pull tripleou/centos-binary-base:12591acf172d2cc621866bca77b2b0f815:52
weshay|ruckLast pushed7 hours agobyrdotripleomirror15:52
weshay|ruckDIGEST15:52
weshay|ruckOS/ARCH15:52
weshay|ruckCOMPRESSED SIZE15:52
weshay|ruck421733af5f2515:52
weshay|ruckcurrent-tripleo15:52
weshay|ruckdocker pull tripleou/centos-binary-base:current-tripleo15:52
weshay|ruckLast pushed7 hours agobyrdotripleomirror15:52
weshay|ruckDIGEST15:52
weshay|ruckOS/ARCH15:52
weshay|ruckCOMPRESSED SIZE15:52
weshay|ruck421733af5f2515:52
weshay|ruckimages look good15:53
weshay|ruckcurrent-tripleo/2021-02-22 04:53-15:53
weshay|ruck[DIR]12591acf172d2cc62186..>2021-02-22 04:53-15:53
weshay|rucknice work15:53
chandankumarweshay|ruck: ysandeep|ruck arxcruz tomorrow we will be testing promoter to push containers to quay for victoria or ussuri FYI15:59
ysandeep|ruckchandankumar, ack15:59
arxcruzchandankumar: let me know prior it, so i can remove it from the list of containers16:01
chandankumararxcruz: sure16:01
*** sshnaidm is now known as sshnaidm|afk16:04
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off16:13
ysandeep|ruckweshay|ruck, is it okay to use run_test_role_vars in job definations(or its just a test project thing) - we basically only need it for c7 sc004 train , Similiar to what I have tried here - https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/32054/5/zuul.yaml , other option is to add standalone_control_virtual_ip in c7 release file?16:17
ysandeep|ruckcontext: https://trello.com/c/3Gx64Z58/1840-cixlp1915519tripleociproatraincentos7scenario004-failing-with-error-ip-192168243-already-exists-too-many-tries16:17
* weshay|ruck looking16:17
weshay|ruckysandeep|ruck, https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/src/branch/master/roles/run-test/templates/role-vars.j216:19
weshay|ruckyes :)16:19
ysandeep|ruckweshay|ruck, ack16:20
weshay|ruckysandeep|ruck, fyi.. victoria and ussuri promoted16:20
ysandeep|ruckweshay|ruck, ++ awesome news, what's the situation with c8 train?16:21
weshay|ruckysandeep|ruck, I think akahat and bhagyashris are live patching the server now16:22
weshay|ruckso.. perhaps tomorrow16:22
ysandeep|ruckack o/16:22
ysandeep|ruckwe are completely green for c8 train https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/buildset/0c074bf21d4e463d82d51e42baf7400b16:22
*** jpodivin has quit IRC16:23
bhagyashrisweshay|ruck, here is the patch https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/32069/ which help us to promote16:24
bhagyashrisand the last change we did to resolve the authentication was this https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/32069/6/ci-scripts/dlrnapi_promoter/logic.py16:24
bhagyashrisfyi ^16:25
weshay|ruckthat looks better :)16:25
bhagyashrisweshay|ruck, sorry this one16:26
bhagyashrishttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/32069/6/ci-scripts/dlrnapi_promoter/dlrn_client.py16:26
weshay|ruckaye16:26
bhagyashrisweshay|ruck, anything you want me to share16:27
bhagyashris?16:27
weshay|ruckI'm not in context of your question.. your patch looks good... what's the question?16:28
bhagyashrisok16:28
bhagyashrisas i am leaving for the day16:28
bhagyashrisso before that you want me to share in case if i miss anything ?16:29
weshay|rucknope.. have a good night, we'll check in tomorrow16:29
bhagyashrisok16:29
bhagyashrisHave a great day :)16:30
* bhagyashris out16:30
frenzy_fridayHey weshay|ruck, which job in integration line goes with which c8 stream nodeset https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/32080/ ?16:38
*** jmasud has joined #oooq16:42
weshay|ruckfrenzy_friday, it's integration-main16:59
weshay|ruckbut oddly I don't see it atm16:59
weshay|ruckhttps://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/status16:59
weshay|ruckwhat gives?16:59
weshay|ruckthis is weird16:59
weshay|ruckfrenzy_friday, https://review.rdoproject.org/r/gitweb?p=rdo-jobs.git;a=blob;f=README.rst#l1417:00
weshay|ruckintegration-pipeline-main.yaml17:01
frenzy_fridayI have duplicated the integration main https://github.com/rdo-infra/rdo-jobs/blob/master/zuul.d/integration-pipeline-main.yaml in testproject. Now I want to make the jobs in integration line (testproject) use c8 stream nodes defined in patch https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/32061/17:02
*** udesale has quit IRC17:03
frenzy_fridaysomething like this https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/32080/ ?17:04
weshay|ruckhttps://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?pipeline=openstack-periodic-integration-main17:04
* weshay|ruck looks17:04
weshay|ruckfrenzy_friday, that's correct..17:06
weshay|ruckis this for the first step, centos-8-stream on top of centos-8 nodes... or the second step where nodes + content are centos-8-stream17:07
frenzy_fridayhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/32041/ - stream repos on 8 node ; https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/32080/ - stream repos on stream node17:08
weshay|ruckfrenzy_friday, k.. thanks, updated https://hackmd.io/9Xve-rYpRaKbk5NMe7kukw?view17:10
weshay|ruckfrenzy_friday, https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/32080/1/.zuul.yaml17:10
weshay|ruckso line 6217:10
weshay|ruckwhat is changing that node to a centos-8-stream?17:10
weshay|ruckfrenzy_friday, I guess https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/32061/2/zuul.d/nodesets.yaml17:12
weshay|rucklines 394 - 41017:12
weshay|ruckfrenzy_friday, k.. give it a try :)17:13
frenzy_fridaythat is my question. Line 18 - I changed it to use stream node. But what about the other jobs? Do they use single-stream or ovb-stream or two-centos-stream ?17:13
* weshay|ruck checks17:13
weshay|ruckfrenzy_friday, follow my links17:14
weshay|ruckhttps://review.rdoproject.org/codesearch/?q=periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-undercloud-containers-master&i=nope&files=&repos=17:14
weshay|ruckundercloud-jobs.yaml17:14
weshay|ruckline 817:15
ysandeep|ruckweshay|ruck, fyi.. 17 line seems hitting a legit issue https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/logs/20/228720/4/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-bm_envA-3ctlr_1comp-featureset035-rhos-17/ba1273f/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/overcloud_deploy.log .. i will debug that further tomorrow incase fix is behind any component.17:16
* weshay|ruck looking for the def of the parent17:16
weshay|ruckysandeep|ruck, k.. I'll poke in a minute.. thank you :)17:16
weshay|ruckhave a good night17:16
ysandeep|ruckbut i think we can merge the job defination and trigger  https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/228720/ and https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/228826/17:17
weshay|ruckfrenzy_friday, https://github.com/rdo-infra/review.rdoproject.org-config/blob/master/zuul.d/tripleo-rdo-base.yaml#L41217:17
weshay|ruckhttps://github.com/rdo-infra/review.rdoproject.org-config/blob/master/zuul.d/tripleo-rdo-base.yaml#L18017:18
frenzy_fridayoh! got it now, single node17:19
weshay|ruckfrenzy_friday, https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/src/branch/master/zuul.d/base.yaml#L28517:19
ysandeep|ruckweshay|ruck, please add these two in your review list as well https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/226758/ and https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/226754/17:20
weshay|ruckfrenzy_friday, so override nodeset17:20
*** ysandeep|ruck is now known as ysandeep|away17:21
weshay|ruckwhat is the nodeset for centos-8-stream?17:21
weshay|ruckI don't see it17:21
* ysandeep|away leaves for the day, see you tomorrow 17:21
weshay|ruck - name: centos-8-stream17:22
weshay|ruck46          label: centos-8-stream17:22
weshay|ruckysandeep|away, 0/17:22
weshay|ruck   name: puppet-openstack-integration-6-scenario001-tempest-centos-8-stream17:22
weshay|ruck30    parent: puppet-openstack-integration-6-scenario00117:22
weshay|ruck31    nodeset: centos-8-stream17:22
weshay|ruck32    voting: false17:22
weshay|ruckya.. so that should work17:22
weshay|ruckfrenzy_friday, so override the nodeset in each of those singlenode jobs17:22
weshay|rucknot 100% sure that's the right name.. for rdo.. but upstream and rdo should be in sync17:23
weshay|ruckhttps://review.rdoproject.org/codesearch/?q=nodeset%3A%20centos-8-stream&i=nope&files=&repos=17:23
weshay|ruckbut that tells me we don't have anything merged w/ it17:24
*** marios is now known as marios|out17:24
weshay|ruckfrenzy_friday, am I making sense?17:24
frenzy_fridayyep. i'll search for the other jobs on codesearch, get the parents and check which nodeset they use. Then switch accordingly17:25
frenzy_fridayNo, the nodeset.yaml changes are not merged. It it workflow -1ed. But I added it as a depends on patch17:26
weshay|ruckfrenzy_friday, ya.. note that not everything is indexed in  codesearch for rdo17:26
weshay|ruckso.. I have all the repos checked out... in a dir17:26
weshay|ruckand use "egrep -rn foo *"17:26
weshay|ruckal ot17:26
weshay|rucka lot17:26
frenzy_fridaycool, thanks17:27
weshay|ruckfrenzy_friday, k.. I emailed the upstream list w/ our plans17:32
weshay|ruckthanks for working on this for us17:32
frenzy_fridaycool! It was fun. Also, updated the hackmd, do the patch descriptions make sense?17:33
weshay|ruckyes.. it's more clear now17:34
weshay|ruckwhich is why I felt comfortable sharing it17:34
weshay|ruckthank you17:34
*** jmasud has quit IRC17:39
*** marios|out has quit IRC17:43
*** derekh has quit IRC18:00
*** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk18:00
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off18:02
*** rlandy|training is now known as rlandy18:02
rlandyfrenzy_friday: sorry - out of training18:03
rlandyare you all set?18:03
frenzy_fridayrlandy, finishing the stream repo on stream node patch18:08
rlandyok18:09
frenzy_fridayrlandy, stream repo on stream node jobs are starting https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/32080/18:21
rlandyfrenzy_friday: weshay|ruck: reading back18:22
rlandythat's fin in testproject18:22
rlandyI think we want to look at the review that moves the line itself18:23
rlandyso we can restart promotions18:23
rlandyOMG ... periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-ovb-1ctlr_2comp-featureset020-internal-rhos-16.2openstack/tripleo-cimasteropenstack-periodic-integration-rhos-16.2master4 hrs 28 mins 55 secs2021-02-23 13:04:47SUCCESS18:32
rlandy2021-02-23 13:05:02.346101 | localhost | Label: upstream-rhel-8-418:33
rlandyon 8.418:33
rlandyweshay|ruck: ysandeep|away: ^^ my life is complete18:33
rlandyone less thing to debug18:33
rlandya pass on OVB18:33
rlandyso excited18:33
rlandyperiodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-bm_envD-3ctlr_1comp-featureset035-rhos-16.2openstack/tripleo-cimasteropenstack-periodic-integration-rhos-16.2master4 hrs 55 mins 2 secs2021-02-23 13:05:11SUCCESS18:33
rlandyand that18:33
rlandyRed Hat Enterprise Linux release 8.4 Beta (Ootpa)18:34
rlandyso exciting18:34
weshay|ruckrlandy, nice18:34
weshay|ruckcongrats :)18:34
rlandyweshay|ruck: oh joy!!18:35
rlandyone passing bm one passing ovb18:35
rlandynow for the failing multinode18:35
rlandyweshay|ruck: legit issue there18:35
rlandythe undercloud/subnode-1 not ssh accessibel after deployment18:35
rlandydebugging18:35
rlandyso on BM we need to update the undercloud18:36
rlandyok - task to do18:36
rlandy"tripleo_common.image.exception.ImageNotFoundException: Not found image: https://docker-registry.upshift.redhat.com/v2/tripleorhos-16-2/openstack-nova-libvirt/manifests/35f2fbf930506e3b5d9b8a1365b32c9b"], "stdout": "", "stdout_lines": []}18:38
rlandyfs001 and 035 seem like registry access issues18:38
rlandyPackages download failure. Overcloud stack: FAILED. Overcloud deploy failed.18:39
rlandyReason: infra18:39
rlandyalmost ... neutron_tempest_plugin.scenario.test_floatingip.FloatingIpMultipleRoutersTest 1 0 1 0 0 Detail18:40
rlandytest_reuse_ip_address_with_other_fip_on_other_router[id-b0382ab3-3c86-4415-84e3-649a8b040dab]18:40
rlandyok - multinode18:40
rlandy1 failure left on the debug list18:40
rlandyfatal: [subnode-1]: UNREACHABLE! => {18:44
rlandy    "changed": false,18:44
rlandy    "unreachable": true18:44
rlandy}18:44
*** jmasud has joined #oooq19:05
rlandyweshay|ruck: ^^ any thoughts off the top of your head?19:07
rlandyssh unreachable after deploy19:08
rlandymuct have been reachable before19:08
rlandymust19:08
rlandydeploy passed19:08
rlandycollect logs failed19:08
rlandyon subnode-119:08
rlandyhttps://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/logs/openstack-periodic-integration-rhos-16.2/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-multinode-1ctlr-featureset010-rhos-16.2/b7672c3/logs/undercloud/etc/hosts looks right19:09
*** jmasud has quit IRC19:10
rlandyopenvswitch-selinux-extra-policy.noarch       1.0-28.el8fdp                                   @rhosp-rhel-8.4-fdp19:12
rlandyopenvswitch2.13.x86_64                        2.13.0-79.5.el8fdp                              @rhosp-rhel-8.4-fdp19:12
rlandymaybe openvswitch19:12
rlandyopenvswitch-selinux-extra-policy.noarch       1.0-28.el8fdp                                   @rhosp-rhel-8.3-fdp19:15
rlandyopenvswitch2.13.x86_64                        2.13.0-79.5.el8fdp                              @rhosp-rhel-8.3-fdp19:15
rlandynah - same19:15
rlandyha  no netstat19:24
weshay|ruckrlandy, at somepoint I'd like to better understand why downstream can't use the same process to build images19:50
weshay|ruckas upstream19:50
weshay|ruckpita19:50
rlandyweshay|ruck: you mean DIB as opposed to virt-customize19:55
rlandynodepool images?19:56
rlandyuses the same method to build overcloud images19:56
rlandyhmmm ... I can definitely ssh around the node before deploy19:59
frenzy_fridayrlandy, Which repo has this ipaserver-undercloud-setup.yml ?20:13
rlandytripelo-quickstart-extras20:13
frenzy_fridaythanks20:13
weshay|ruckrlandy, oh.. this was an overcloud image build issue?20:14
rlandyactually tasks_from20:14
rlandyfrenzy_friday:^^ sec20:16
*** sanjayu_ has quit IRC20:16
rlandyI'm wrong20:16
rlandyit calls that20:16
rlandygetting20:16
frenzy_fridayno, I got the yml in quickstart extras20:16
frenzy_fridaytestproject threw an error : The task includes an option with an undefined variable. The error was: "hostvars['subnode-1']" is undefined20:17
rlandyoh ok20:17
rlandyweshay|ruck: ?20:17
rlandymutinode deployment20:18
weshay|ruckyou mentioned netstat was missing from an image?20:18
rlandyit's missing in the logs20:18
rlandyI have a run going now where I installed netstat on both nodes manually20:19
rlandywant to see if that helps20:19
weshay|ruckright.. so I'll reask the question20:19
rlandyidk what caused it yet exactly20:19
weshay|ruckwhy are the rhel nodes in internal sf built w/ a different process than upstream20:19
weshay|ruckwhy are we finding missing packages20:20
rlandyweshay|ruck: idk20:20
weshay|ruckwhat is the root cause20:20
weshay|ruckseems like if we can align in the how they are built20:20
weshay|ruckwe can avoid chasing this kind of a thing down20:20
rlandyone uses DIB and the other virt-customize20:20
weshay|ruckya20:20
weshay|ruckwhy.. we should poke at it20:20
rlandyidk why there is that diff tbh20:21
rlandyit's not always the nodepool build process20:21
weshay|ruckbut you are spending time working around it20:21
rlandyit can be the base guest image20:21
rlandybetween rhel 8.3 and 8.4 there is not much diff in the nodepool virt0customize file20:22
rlandyweshay|ruck: however if this works, I will add netstat to the nodepool image20:29
*** frenzy_friday is now known as frenzyfriday20:37
*** frenzyfriday is now known as frenzyfriday|12320:42
*** frenzyfriday|123 is now known as frenzyfriday|brb20:42
*** slaweq has quit IRC20:50
rlandy[zuul@upstream-rhel-8-4-tripleo-ci-0000204323 ~]$ ssh zuul@192.168.100.171 -i /etc/nodepool/id_rsa20:55
rlandyit can - why does it say it can't20:55
rlandyweshay|ruck: ugh - same story21:08
rlandyhttps://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/logs/95/200295/56/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-multinode-1ctlr-featureset010-rhos-16.2/247ac75/logs/21:08
rlandyunreachable after deploy21:08
rlandyhttps://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/logs/95/200295/56/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-rhel-8-multinode-1ctlr-featureset010-rhos-16.2/247ac75/logs/undercloud/var/log/extra/netstat.txt exists now21:11
weshay|ruckrlandy, right.. so openvswitch is probably the issue21:14
rlandysame version of openvswitch21:14
*** frenzyfriday|brb is now known as frenzy_friday21:41
rlandyweshay|ruck: k - I am trying another run ... but decision to promote what we have?22:03
rlandyI'm inclined to say no22:03
rlandybecause then we will switch the component lines22:03
rlandyand that will alos fail multinode if we have not worke dit out yet22:03
weshay|ruckrlandy, the only thing that is a concern is 03522:04
rlandyfs035?22:04
weshay|ruckya22:04
weshay|ruckoh wait22:04
weshay|ruckthe bm is fs035 \0/22:05
rlandyfs01022:05
weshay|ruckrlandy, let's chat22:05
weshay|ruckrlandy, no.. don't car22:05
weshay|rucke22:05
weshay|ruckI'll tell you why22:05
rlandyok22:05
weshay|ruckhttps://meet.google.com/fer-yxhm-xyo?authuser=122:05
*** jmasud has joined #oooq22:06
*** jmasud has quit IRC22:37
rlandyweshay|ruck:  https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/228873 Move release files for 16.2 to rhel 8.422:52
rlandysec - moving nodesets to 8.4 for component jobs22:52
weshay|ruckshall I merge?22:55
rlandyweshay|ruck: not yet22:56
rlandyweshay|ruck: I can't move the node label as 17 is still 8.322:56
rlandydoing a nodeset patch job22:56
rlandycouple minutes22:57
weshay|ruckrlandy, k.. I'm back and forth w/ kids..22:57
weshay|ruckI'll keep checking back22:57
rlandyweshay|ruck: no worries - I'm here for a while22:57
rlandyweshay|ruck:  https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/228875 Move component 16.2 jobs to rhel 8.423:16
*** jmasud has joined #oooq23:17
*** jmasud_ has joined #oooq23:52
*** jmasud has quit IRC23:54
rlandyweshay|ruck: think it's the virt: av module23:58

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!