| *** rfolco has quit IRC | 00:29 | |
| *** ykarel has joined #oooq | 01:50 | |
| *** apetrich has quit IRC | 02:14 | |
| *** ykarel has quit IRC | 02:18 | |
| *** sanjayu__ has joined #oooq | 02:22 | |
| *** Goneri has quit IRC | 02:46 | |
| *** ratailor has joined #oooq | 05:11 | |
| *** udesale has joined #oooq | 05:13 | |
| *** chandankumar is now known as chkumar|ruck | 05:37 | |
| *** ykarel has joined #oooq | 05:38 | |
| *** ysandeep|away is now known as ysandeep | 05:51 | |
| *** marios has joined #oooq | 06:13 | |
| *** marios is now known as marios|ruck | 06:13 | |
| *** marios|ruck is now known as marios|rover | 06:13 | |
| marios|rover | chkumar|ruck: o/ | 06:13 |
|---|---|---|
| *** chkumar|ruck is now known as chkumar|rover | 06:13 | |
| marios|rover | chkumar|ruck: let's sync in a bit? | 06:14 |
| marios|rover | chkumar|rover: heh i just changed my name after i saw yours | 06:14 |
| marios|rover | chkumar|rover: we can do half each swap after 1.5 weeks? | 06:14 |
| chkumar|rover | marios|rover: let's sync | 06:14 |
| marios|rover | chkumar|rover: want to start as ruck or rover | 06:14 |
| marios|rover | chkumar|rover: gimme few mins | 06:14 |
| marios|rover | chkumar|rover: just getting setup | 06:14 |
| chkumar|rover | marios|rover: sure, let me know when ready | 06:14 |
| marios|rover | chkumar|rover: half passed ok? | 06:14 |
| marios|rover | chkumar|rover: 15 mins | 06:14 |
| chkumar|rover | marios|rover: yes works for me | 06:14 |
| marios|rover | zbr: around? | 06:14 |
| *** akahat is now known as akahat|PTO | 06:30 | |
| marios|rover | chkumar|rover: https://meet.google.com/wzo-ipzk-yaj whenever you're ready | 06:30 |
| *** tosky has joined #oooq | 06:32 | |
| *** marios|rover is now known as marios|ruck | 06:34 | |
| marios|ruck | ysandeep: zbr: around? | 06:35 |
| ysandeep | marios|ruck, o/ Hey | 06:36 |
| marios|ruck | ysandeep: are you available to join us for quick sync please? | 06:36 |
| ysandeep | marios|ruck, yes but I also see wes have set a meeting for RR sync | 06:37 |
| marios|ruck | ysandeep: yeah but its in the afternoon | 06:37 |
| marios|ruck | ysandeep: me and chkumar|rover are doing a quick sync now | 06:37 |
| marios|ruck | ysandeep: especially wanted to know if there are any bugs against the blocked promotions | 06:37 |
| ysandeep | marios|ruck, sure i can join | 06:37 |
| marios|ruck | ysandeep: like master is 1 week old | 06:37 |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1885602 | 06:38 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1885602 in tripleo "Octavia component: failing tempest, Details: {'faultcode': 'Client', 'faultstring': 'Policy does not allow this request to be performed.'," [Critical,Fix released] - Assigned to Brent Eagles (beagles) | 06:38 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: yeah it is 1 month old though | 06:39 |
| marios|ruck | ysandeep: 09:30 < marios|rover> chkumar|rover: https://meet.google.com/wzo-ipzk-yaj whenever you're ready | 06:39 |
| *** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej | 06:55 | |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: https://hackmd.io/QnprH9-yRTi6uWlEfaahoQ?view under on-going issues, can we keep the filed bug or issues release wise ? | 07:04 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: sure do whatever you like | 07:05 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: i am planning on using the 'today'/'yesterday' system | 07:05 |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: that is also fine | 07:05 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: otherwise i find it impossible to read the hackmd | 07:05 |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|lunch | 07:08 | |
| *** bhagyashris is now known as bhagyashris|lunc | 07:28 | |
| *** pojadhav is now known as pojadhav|lunch | 07:37 | |
| *** ysandeep|lunch is now known as ysandeep | 07:46 | |
| *** bogdando has joined #oooq | 07:50 | |
| *** apetrich has joined #oooq | 07:50 | |
| *** jbadiapa has joined #oooq | 07:55 | |
| *** jpena|off is now known as jpena | 07:56 | |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: can you get onto the promoters? | 07:59 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: i want to check the current status of the criteria | 07:59 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: e.g. in logs says missing jobs [u'periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-ovb-1ctlr_2comp-featureset020-master | 07:59 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: but https://github.com/rdo-infra/ci-config/blob/722d298ca4baee00f79ad91968d9fd3ff801fbb6/ci-scripts/dlrnapi_promoter/config/CentOS-8/master.ini#L40 | 07:59 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: it isn't in the criteria ^^^ | 07:59 |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: does tmate still active? | 08:00 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: no idea | 08:00 |
| chkumar|rover | ysandeep: ^^ | 08:00 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: checking | 08:00 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: no | 08:00 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: we need access anyway | 08:00 |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: yes | 08:00 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: so right now can't do much about that | 08:00 |
| chkumar|rover | yup | 08:01 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: but this is a big mess wrt manual changes on there | 08:01 |
| *** ykarel_ has joined #oooq | 08:01 | |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: especially the criteria | 08:01 |
| chkumar|rover | yup | 08:01 |
| ysandeep | chkumar|rover, tmux not active | 08:03 |
| *** ykarel has quit IRC | 08:03 | |
| *** ykarel_ is now known as ykarel | 08:13 | |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: fyi new bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1889524 baremetal component fs1 ironic issue | 08:29 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1889524 in tripleo "periodic centos8 ovb featureset 1 baremetal master fails ironic unexpected keyword argument 'hash_function " [Critical,Triaged] | 08:29 |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: adding to my queue | 08:34 |
| *** derekh has joined #oooq | 08:39 | |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: we need common component promotion to tripleo-ci-testing will fix the above issue | 08:44 |
| ysandeep | pojadhav|lunch, hey o/ , added a comment here https://review.opendev.org/#/c/742879/1/zuul.d/layout.yaml , I think think some of update/upgrade jobs here will trigger on train branch.. | 08:47 |
| ysandeep | I think some of update/upgrade jobs here will **not** trigger on train branch.. | 08:48 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: looking | 08:49 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: network component is in pretty bad shape- 2 weeks old now no promotion... filed a new one for that tempest issue https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1889529 | 08:50 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1889529 in tripleo "periodic centos8 scenario10 network component standalone master timeout tempest conflicting state" [Critical,Triaged] | 08:50 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: nice quick find :) https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1889524/comments/1 | 08:51 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1889524 in tripleo "periodic centos8 ovb featureset 1 baremetal master fails ironic unexpected keyword argument 'hash_function " [Critical,Triaged] - Assigned to chandan kumar (chkumar246) | 08:51 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: well tripleo component looks pretty green so that's good for ^ | 08:52 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: hmm but that patch merged 9 days ago | 08:52 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: and there have been promotions | 08:52 |
| marios|ruck | for tripleo component | 08:52 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: ah *common* not tripleo | 08:53 |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: yes | 08:53 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: well the latest fail there is one-off so didn't file a bug for it yet https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?job_name=periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-scenario001-standalone-common-master | 08:53 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: but also common has promoted yesterday/27th etc | 08:54 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: will comment on bug | 08:54 |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: sorry, python3-tooz is available in tripleo-ci-testing repo https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-master/component/common/tripleo-ci-testing/ | 08:57 |
| chkumar|rover | we need master promotion to clear that | 08:57 |
| arxcruz | chkumar|rover: marios|ruck is this a known issue https://33b99a016672983cc6e0-f789711051b6c1b650cb1c234d7d09c0.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/743721/3/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-containers-multinode-train/5401e36/job-output.txt ? | 09:00 |
| marios|ruck | arxcruz: yes | 09:01 |
| marios|ruck | https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1889357 arxcruz | 09:01 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1889357 in tripleo "Centos7 Check/Gate jobs failing with UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xc5 in position 2: ordinal not in range(128)" [Critical,In progress] - Assigned to wes hayutin (weshayutin) | 09:01 |
| chkumar|rover | arxcruz: it got fixed by https://review.opendev.org/#/c/743691/ | 09:01 |
| arxcruz | chkumar|rover: ty | 09:02 |
| chkumar|rover | you can safely recheck your patches | 09:02 |
| marios|ruck | arxcruz: you're welcome | 09:02 |
| marios|ruck | arxcruz: invoice in the post | 09:02 |
| *** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur | 09:03 | |
| arxcruz | marios|ruck: i'll pay in beers :) | 09:03 |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: let me sync all the promoting criteria in ci-config from promoter missing jobs | 09:04 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: ack | 09:04 |
| *** jfrancoa has joined #oooq | 09:06 | |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|afk | 09:13 | |
| holser | marios|ruck sshnaidm|afk ykarel can yoiu merge https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/28779/ | 09:17 |
| holser | I need it to debug one problem on ussuri | 09:18 |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1889529 is a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1885602 | 09:18 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1889529 in tripleo "periodic centos8 scenario10 network component standalone master timeout tempest conflicting state" [Critical,Triaged] | 09:18 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1885602 in tripleo "Octavia component: failing tempest, Details: {'faultcode': 'Client', 'faultstring': 'Policy does not allow this request to be performed.'," [Critical,Fix released] - Assigned to Brent Eagles (beagles) | 09:18 |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: sorry it is a different error | 09:19 |
| sshnaidm|afk | holser, done | 09:20 |
| *** sshnaidm|afk is now known as sshnaidm | 09:20 | |
| ykarel | holser, btw i tihnk u can create the branches directly in reproducer gerrit to test | 09:21 |
| ykarel | i had used that in past | 09:21 |
| holser | I can hack local copy | 09:21 |
| holser | that | 09:21 |
| holser | s correct | 09:21 |
| ykarel | holser, btw which job u trying to reproduce? | 09:22 |
| ykarel | there was a bug related to dlrn_hash_tag, u might hit in some job | 09:23 |
| holser | ykarel https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1888411 | 09:23 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1888411 in tripleo "ussuri centos8 undercloud upgrades job failing DBConnectionError - mysql" [Critical,Triaged] - Assigned to Sergii Golovatiuk (sgolovatiuk) | 09:23 |
| holser | ykarel in current case - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/739457/13 | 09:23 |
| ykarel | holser, ack this don't have that issue | 09:23 |
| odyssey4me | morning arxcruz - do we need to port https://review.opendev.org/#/c/743573/ back to some stable branches, or is oooq using the master branch? | 09:23 |
| holser | ykarel https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/56202b8f89e341cb97ff34584e9496b1 | 09:24 |
| holser | odyssey4me oooq is branchless | 09:24 |
| arxcruz | odyssey4me: using master branch | 09:24 |
| odyssey4me | holser: yep, I'm aware of that - but my concern was whether it uses stable branches from other roles | 09:24 |
| holser | Ahhh | 09:25 |
| odyssey4me | arxcruz: ok cool, thanks for confirming - hopefully that solves the last issue :) | 09:25 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: yes there are two that i thought were related https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1887790 https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1885602 Policy does not allow this request to be performed | 09:33 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1885602 in tripleo "duplicate for #1887790 Octavia component: failing tempest, Details: {'faultcode': 'Client', 'faultstring': 'Policy does not allow this request to be performed.'," [Critical,Fix released] - Assigned to Brent Eagles (beagles) | 09:33 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1885602 in tripleo "Octavia component: failing tempest, Details: {'faultcode': 'Client', 'faultstring': 'Policy does not allow this request to be performed.'," [Critical,Fix released] - Assigned to Brent Eagles (beagles) | 09:33 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: but i think they are different (actually they are duplicates of each other but different to the one i filed earlier) | 09:33 |
| *** bhagyashris|lunc is now known as bhagyashris | 09:37 | |
| *** ysandeep|afk is now known as ysandeep | 09:39 | |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: should i review or you working there https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/28624/ | 09:43 |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: yes please review | 09:47 |
| ysandeep | panda, hey o/ Can you please share the tar - as we discussed yesterday. | 09:50 |
| jfrancoa | chkumar|rover: hey, have you seen (or are you aware of) this failure in (stable/train) CI jobs: http://pastebin.test.redhat.com/889107 ? | 09:52 |
| chkumar|rover | jfrancoa: yes it got fixed now, if it is coming on centos-7 based job | 09:53 |
| chkumar|rover | you can safely recheck | 09:53 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: is that right? https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/28624/34/ci-scripts/dlrnapi_promoter/stage_containers.py | 09:53 |
| jfrancoa | chkumar|rover: cool, thanks! | 09:53 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: line 219 | 09:54 |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: yes, that is the correct format | 09:54 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: are we writing the file twice or am i reading it wrong | 09:54 |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: sorry I need to use a different object | 09:54 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: so -1 is corrent? | 09:55 |
| marios|ruck | correct? | 09:55 |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: yes | 09:55 |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: I got the solution | 09:55 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: k thanks i was questioning my sanity :D | 09:55 |
| *** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|brb | 10:23 | |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: for ussuri promoter criteria config, it is ok | 10:31 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: you mean you got on the promoters? | 10:36 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: how did you check we can't get on them | 10:36 |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: I am checking from the missing jobs from the promoter logs | 10:36 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: but missing jobs are already in the criteria (at least in the git repo) but the problem was we don't know what is going on in the promoter themselves | 10:37 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: so you're trying to match what is missing with the git repo i.e. make it the same? | 10:37 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: k commented add fs20 too then? https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/28785/ | 10:39 |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: ok, sure | 10:40 |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: missing job is from criteria defined in the promoter, that is what I am trying to match with CI config//criteria. | 10:42 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: ack yeah got it now.. you are trying to make the repo same as what they manually changed in the promoters, which shows up in missing jobs | 10:44 |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|adk | 11:02 | |
| *** ysandeep|adk is now known as ysandeep|afk | 11:02 | |
| *** sshnaidm_ has joined #oooq | 11:27 | |
| *** sshnaidm has quit IRC | 11:27 | |
| *** jpena is now known as jpena|lunch | 11:29 | |
| *** sshnaidm_ is now known as sshnaidm | 11:30 | |
| arxcruz | marios|ruck: chkumar|rover ykarel https://review.opendev.org/#/c/743721/ | 11:33 |
| arxcruz | this is a promotion blocker | 11:34 |
| arxcruz | marios|ruck: let me know if you are satisfied with my comments there | 11:34 |
| *** ysandeep|afk is now known as ysandeep | 11:36 | |
| marios|ruck | arxcruz: see comment https://review.opendev.org/#/c/743721/3/playbooks/tempest.yml@28 | 11:37 |
| *** ykarel has quit IRC | 11:38 | |
| *** ykarel has joined #oooq | 11:39 | |
| arxcruz | marios|ruck: oh, sorry, i missunderstood your question, replied there :) | 11:40 |
| marios|ruck | arxcruz: thanks revoted | 11:42 |
| weshay|ruck | marios|ruck, chkumar|rover aye.. wait for the sync re: promotions | 11:51 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: ack | 11:51 |
| *** Tengu has quit IRC | 11:53 | |
| *** udesale_ has joined #oooq | 11:54 | |
| *** Tengu has joined #oooq | 11:55 | |
| arxcruz | marios|ruck: thanks, I can rest in peace now, this was hunting me in my nightmares | 11:56 |
| marios|ruck | :) | 11:57 |
| *** udesale has quit IRC | 11:57 | |
| weshay|ruck | marios|ruck, chkumar|rover https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/buildset/ee9b1bac38af4148a704c018e6572dab looks pretty good | 11:57 |
| weshay|ruck | chkumar|rover, this again .. we've had bugs on NetSecGroup previously.. maybe we reopen and skip https://logserver.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic-integration-main/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-full-tempest-scenario-master/883e204/logs/undercloud/var/log/tempest/stestr_results.html.gz | 11:58 |
| * chkumar|rover checks | 11:59 | |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: chkumar|rover: same on fs 20 https://logserver.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic-integration-main/opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-ovb-1ctlr_2comp-featureset020-master/2dc0d42/logs/undercloud/var/log/tempest/stestr_results.html.gz | 12:01 |
| marios|ruck | and fs20 2nd time failed today... apparently it is in criteria (not in the repo, but on the promoter itself looks like) | 12:01 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: chkumar|rover: filing bug | 12:02 |
| chkumar|rover | ok | 12:02 |
| *** rfolco has joined #oooq | 12:02 | |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: chkumar|rover: might be same as https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1889529 ? | 12:04 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1889529 in tripleo "periodic centos8 scenario10 network component standalone master timeout tempest conflicting state" [Critical,Triaged] | 12:04 |
| marios|ruck | tempest.lib.exceptions.Conflict: Conflict with state of target resource | 12:04 |
| marios|ruck | Details: {'type': 'IpAddressGenerationFailure', 'message': 'No more IP addresses available on network 2309d220-59b5-445f-8157-ab962046518b.', 'detail': ''} | 12:04 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: will file it anyway we mark later if so | 12:04 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch | 12:05 | |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: weshay|ruck: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1889553 | 12:08 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1889553 in tripleo "centos8 periodic master jobs failing tempest 'no more ip addresses' " [Critical,Triaged] | 12:08 |
| chkumar|rover | ok | 12:08 |
| weshay|ruck | arxcruz, ^ was working that issue | 12:09 |
| arxcruz | weshay|ruck: marios|ruck the original bug is this https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1888511 | 12:12 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1888511 in tripleo "Some tempest tests are failing with floating ip quota" [Undecided,Triaged] | 12:12 |
| arxcruz | weshay|ruck: as I asked, need someone from network checking that, it's well explained on the bug | 12:13 |
| arxcruz | weshay|ruck: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23oooq/%23oooq.2020-07-22.log.html#t2020-07-22T13:30:00 | 12:14 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: arxcruz: chkumar|rover: marked duplicate for now | 12:15 |
| chkumar|rover | ok thanks! | 12:20 |
| *** jmasud has quit IRC | 12:21 | |
| *** derekh has quit IRC | 12:23 | |
| marios|ruck | e | 12:29 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: chkumar|rover: no meet on the invite https://meet.google.com/ubw-gphq-hio | 12:30 |
| ysandeep | weshay|ruck, gmeet link for RR sync | 12:30 |
| ysandeep | Missing in calendar | 12:30 |
| weshay|ruck | marios|ruck, ysandeep chkumar|rover zbr https://meet.google.com/yed-qkfj-hjm | 12:31 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: ok, joining yours then | 12:31 |
| *** jpena|lunch is now known as jpena | 12:32 | |
| weshay|ruck | https://hackmd.io/ermQSlQ-Q-mDtZkNN2oihQ | 12:39 |
| weshay|ruck | marios|ruck, chkumar|rover http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-infra/%23openstack-infra.2020-07-28.log.html#t2020-07-28T16:12:40 | 12:39 |
| weshay|ruck | http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-infra/%23openstack-infra.2020-07-29.log.html#t2020-07-29T18:16:36 | 12:40 |
| marios|ruck | https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1889529 | 12:43 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1889529 in tripleo "periodic centos8 scenario10 network component standalone master timeout tempest conflicting state" [Critical,Triaged] | 12:43 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: chkumar|rover: ^ | 12:43 |
| bhagyashris | ysandeep, what do you think if we keep upgrade job as is, i mean to say keep running upgrade jobs on c7 just for coverage because right now we dont have (c8 train upgrade jobs) --> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/742879/ | 12:48 |
| ysandeep | I agree to keep c7 upgrade job, lets also discuss with others in team mtg | 12:49 |
| *** dtantsur|brb is now known as dtantsur | 12:53 | |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: I am adding the tests to skip list | 12:55 |
| weshay|ruck | marios|ruck, http://promoter.rdoproject.org/CURRENT_CRITERIA/ | 13:00 |
| rfolco | arxcruz, rfolco, zbr, sshnaidm, rlandy, marios, ysandeep, bhagyashris, soniya29, pojadhav, akahat, weshay, chandankumar | 13:00 |
| rfolco | ping planning | 13:01 |
| rfolco | https://meet.google.com/tbr-rgjz-cjc?authuser=1 | 13:01 |
| rfolco | https://hackmd.io/IhMCTNMBSF6xtqiEd9Z0Kw#2020-07-09-Unified-Sprint-31-Planning | 13:01 |
| rfolco | arxcruz, rfolco, zbr, sshnaidm, rlandy, marios, ysandeep, bhagyashris, soniya29, pojadhav, akahat, weshay, chandankuma | 13:02 |
| rfolco | last call | 13:02 |
| rfolco | we are departing | 13:02 |
| weshay|ruck | pojadhav|lunch, mtg | 13:03 |
| weshay|ruck | zbr, mtg | 13:03 |
| weshay|ruck | pojadhav|lunch, unping :) | 13:04 |
| weshay|ruck | pojadhav|lunch, take as much time as you need | 13:04 |
| *** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej | 13:05 | |
| *** ratailor has quit IRC | 13:07 | |
| *** sshnaidm is now known as sshnaidm|mtg | 13:08 | |
| *** derekh has joined #oooq | 13:11 | |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: weshay|ruck arxcruz https://review.opendev.org/#/c/743968/ | 13:16 |
| chkumar|rover | skop list | 13:16 |
| chkumar|rover | *skip list | 13:17 |
| weshay|ruck | bhagyashris, https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/28614/ | 13:34 |
| chkumar|rover | kopecmartin: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/743968/ quick merge | 13:35 |
| *** TrevorV has joined #oooq | 13:38 | |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: i commented i see different tests from today | 13:40 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: but kopecmartin hit +A | 13:40 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/743968/1/roles/validate-tempest/vars/tempest_skip.yml | 13:40 |
| kopecmartin | marios|ruck: i took back +w | 13:41 |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: I have taken it from fs020 | 13:42 |
| chkumar|rover | marios|ruck: let me go back and edit | 13:42 |
| marios|ruck | chkumar|rover: ack yeah they are differetn... same trace but different set of tests? | 13:48 |
| marios|ruck | thanks kopecmartin | 13:49 |
| kopecmartin | marios|ruck: no, thank you! | 13:52 |
| *** Goneri has joined #oooq | 13:52 | |
| chkumar|rover | arxcruz: marios|ruck kopecmartin https://review.opendev.org/743968 now good to go | 13:54 |
| arxcruz | chkumar|rover: kopecmartin in the future, we need to add a validation if the test is duplicated on the skiplist | 14:00 |
| kopecmartin | arxcruz: +1 | 14:02 |
| weshay|ruck | rfolco, akahat, arxcruz bhagyashris, 50% sandeep, sorin, marios|ruck | 14:12 |
| weshay|ruck | rfolco, ^ | 14:13 |
| *** chem has joined #oooq | 14:13 | |
| *** bogdando has quit IRC | 14:20 | |
| chkumar|rover | weshay|ruck: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/743968/ +w | 14:31 |
| *** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away | 14:32 | |
| weshay|ruck | chkumar|rover++ | 14:33 |
| *** bhagyashris is now known as bhagyashris|away | 14:47 | |
| ysandeep | bhagyashris On https://review.opendev.org/#/c/742587 - do we really need Depends-On: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/743455/, Depends-On: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/743959/.. I think we should do opposite - first remove from layout | 14:47 |
| ysandeep | bhagyashris|away, ^^ | 14:47 |
| ysandeep | bhagyashris|away, will catch up with you tommorow, good night o/ | 14:48 |
| weshay|ruck | rfolco, ok.. the board should be read-only for everyone except you and me | 14:49 |
| rfolco | weshay|ruck, you made it? | 14:49 |
| weshay|ruck | yup | 14:50 |
| weshay|ruck | rfolco, haven't tested | 14:50 |
| rfolco | weshay|ruck, thanks | 14:51 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: you starting a meet? | 14:59 |
| weshay|ruck | marios|ruck, pm | 15:00 |
| marios|ruck | ack | 15:00 |
| *** ykarel|away has quit IRC | 15:02 | |
| *** panda has quit IRC | 15:21 | |
| ysandeep | weshay|ruck, when free - do you know any reason we are still running c7 jobs against puppet-tripleo master - https://github.com/openstack/puppet-tripleo/blob/master/zuul.d/layout.yaml | 15:25 |
| weshay|ruck | ysandeep, this job? https://github.com/openstack/puppet-tripleo/blob/master/zuul.d/layout.yaml#L11 | 15:27 |
| ysandeep | yes | 15:27 |
| ysandeep | i noticed this when porting things from c7 to c8 for train | 15:28 |
| weshay|ruck | ysandeep, ya.. let's update... it doesn't run often https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container&project=openstack%2Fpuppet-tripleo | 15:28 |
| ysandeep | weshay|ruck, on it | 15:28 |
| weshay|ruck | ysandeep, thanks! and the coverage is pretty solid.. looking at https://review.opendev.org/#/c/731816/ | 15:29 |
| weshay|ruck | ysandeep, just an oversight.. thanks for catching it | 15:29 |
| ysandeep | weshay|ruck also for train - as here we only have 1 job tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container in puppet tripleo(train branch) - we agreed to not remove this job for c7 coverage.. As its a only jobs here What to do here 1) Do nothing here 2) port this alone c7 job to c8 3) add c8 job in addition? | 15:29 |
| ysandeep | for ussuri and master - I am clear on porting them to c8, as we don't need c7 coverage there | 15:30 |
| weshay|ruck | ysandeep++ | 15:32 |
| weshay|ruck | chkumar|rover, arxcruz nice job on the jobs for the skip list | 15:33 |
| weshay|ruck | MERGE FAST | 15:33 |
| weshay|ruck | ! | 15:33 |
| arxcruz | yup, 5-7 minutes | 15:34 |
| weshay|ruck | arxcruz, so did my question about the functional tests make sense | 15:36 |
| weshay|ruck | from yesterday | 15:36 |
| arxcruz | so, you want to deploy ooo and run the functional tests from openstackclient for example right ? | 15:36 |
| weshay|ruck | ya.. more wondering about it.. then asking for anything | 15:36 |
| arxcruz | chkumar|rover: https://storage.bhs.cloud.ovh.net/v1/AUTH_dcaab5e32b234d56b626f72581e3644c/zuul_opendev_logs_bb2/740662/8/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-containers-multinode-queens/bb2cd48/job-output.txt it's failing on network geneve, i remember you were the one who make the settings | 15:37 |
| arxcruz | weshay|ruck: did we have a case that it breaks ooo ? | 15:37 |
| arxcruz | i need to check what those tests do | 15:37 |
| weshay|ruck | arxcruz, re: functional tests.. no.. just fielding some questins from other dfg's | 15:38 |
| weshay|ruck | arxcruz, I wonder if that functional suite would be interesting to run along side the ansible module ci sshnaidm|mtg | 15:38 |
| weshay|ruck | arxcruz, but here's my specific question... | 15:39 |
| *** sshnaidm|mtg is now known as sshnaidm | 15:39 | |
| arxcruz | weshay|ruck: let me check the code first, if it uses the restapi, it's the same as tempest | 15:39 |
| arxcruz | so i don't see a reason to run it | 15:39 |
| weshay|ruck | arxcruz, running tox from the src from the python-openstackclient rpm | 15:39 |
| weshay|ruck | arxcruz, doesn't tempest use it's own client? | 15:39 |
| arxcruz | weshay|ruck: yes, but at the end, it calls the restapi | 15:40 |
| weshay|ruck | arxcruz, right.. so server side errors would be found, but not client | 15:41 |
| arxcruz | the client is tested in tempest | 15:42 |
| arxcruz | i mean, the tempest client | 15:42 |
| chkumar|rover | arxcruz: - tripleo-ci-centos-7-containers-multinode-queens https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/9a9425546717400280c7e50d598edef9 : SUCCESS in 2h 04m 43s is apssing na | 15:44 |
| chkumar|rover | ? | 15:44 |
| *** artom has joined #oooq | 15:44 | |
| weshay|ruck | arxcruz, artom and I were discussing it yesterday | 15:44 |
| weshay|ruck | artom, may have examples of where things break but could be caught w/ the functional tests | 15:45 |
| weshay|ruck | artom, and you are saying the functional tests would fail where tempest would not fail right? | 15:45 |
| weshay|ruck | like in just the client code | 15:45 |
| artom | weshay|ruck, well, tempest doesn't make sense in the context of osc | 15:45 |
| artom | Tempest does its own requests with python requests or whatever, completely independently of any clients. | 15:46 |
| weshay|ruck | aye | 15:46 |
| chkumar|rover | arxcruz: got it | 15:46 |
| arxcruz | yup, tempest uses restapi | 15:46 |
| chkumar|rover | arxcruz: let me get a the solution | 15:46 |
| arxcruz | chkumar|rover: i think we should have flat for queens ? | 15:46 |
| artom | So if we want to have confidence that osc actually works against real openstack APIs, functional testing is the way to do | 15:46 |
| artom | arxcruz, in the upstream gate they have devstack functional jobs that do just that - deploy a devstack cloud and run osc against it | 15:47 |
| arxcruz | ok | 15:47 |
| artom | arxcruz, in OSP to my knowledge we have nothing of the sort | 15:47 |
| artom | But... Michal is on PTO, I'd like to confirm with him first | 15:48 |
| arxcruz | artom: the api tempest uses, is the api available in the $project | 15:48 |
| artom | arxcruz, well, tempest only tests Nova, Neutron and Cinder (I think?) | 15:48 |
| artom | Mostly Nova | 15:48 |
| weshay|ruck | chkumar|rover, marios|ruck fyi.. ussuri tried to promote and failed | 15:48 |
| artom | Other projects have their own tempest plugins | 15:48 |
| arxcruz | artom: we have tempest tests for all the projects | 15:48 |
| weshay|ruck | I'll watch the rerun | 15:48 |
| arxcruz | with plugins | 15:49 |
| marios|ruck | weshay|ruck: thanks | 15:49 |
| * marios|ruck getting ready to go | 15:49 | |
| artom | arxcruz, right, but via plugins. | 15:49 |
| chkumar|rover | arxcruz: https://opendev.org/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/src/branch/master/config/general_config/featureset030.yml#L114 | 15:49 |
| arxcruz | artom: yes | 15:49 |
| artom | arxcruz, and tempest tests the server-side APIs | 15:49 |
| chkumar|rover | arxcruz: put all the stuff of fs030 for stein and queens | 15:49 |
| chkumar|rover | it will work | 15:49 |
| artom | arxcruz, osc functional testing is to make sure osc does requests correctly, and handles responses correctly | 15:49 |
| chkumar|rover | ovn works from train onwards | 15:49 |
| chkumar|rover | earlier it was ovs only | 15:50 |
| chkumar|rover | arxcruz: add those conditional in tempest.yaml playbook | 15:50 |
| arxcruz | artom: okay, i need to take a look in osc | 15:50 |
| arxcruz | chkumar|rover: yup | 15:50 |
| arxcruz | thanks | 15:50 |
| *** marios|ruck has quit IRC | 15:52 | |
| artom | arxcruz, the code exists, the jobs exist in their devstack form upstream | 15:52 |
| artom | arxcruz, the gap is that no one actually owns osc within RH, so if we do backports, our confidence level is diminished | 15:52 |
| artom | Because of that lack of functional testing | 15:52 |
| arxcruz | artom: i don't see a problem for that | 15:52 |
| weshay|ruck | chkumar|rover, need review on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/744006/ | 15:52 |
| weshay|ruck | easy one | 15:52 |
| arxcruz | i mean, doesn't hurt tot est | 15:52 |
| arxcruz | to test* | 15:52 |
| artom | arxcruz, you don't see a problem with testing, or with not testing? | 15:53 |
| weshay|ruck | artom, and I'm fairly certain migi has this already | 15:53 |
| weshay|ruck | so when he's back from pto.. perhaps we can ask | 15:53 |
| artom | weshay|ruck, yeah, we (Compute) do a tech call on Monday, he'll be back and I'll bring this up then | 15:53 |
| weshay|ruck | +1 | 15:53 |
| weshay|ruck | artom, if he has internal zuul job.. which I'm not sure if still does.. we can just run it clients component | 15:54 |
| weshay|ruck | if not we'll work w/ him on building it | 15:54 |
| weshay|ruck | possibly | 15:54 |
| weshay|ruck | :) | 15:54 |
| artom | I do like your strategically vague commitments ;) | 15:54 |
| weshay|ruck | but should be easy.. so why not | 15:54 |
| weshay|ruck | artom, we have a lot of jobs to watch | 15:55 |
| arxcruz | artom: i don't see a problem test it | 15:55 |
| artom | weshay|ruck, yep, totally get it, it was tongue in cheek | 15:55 |
| weshay|ruck | aye.. np | 15:55 |
| artom | Few people will just welcome more work with open arms :) | 15:55 |
| arxcruz | artom: mostly people say why, i say why not | 15:55 |
| weshay|ruck | and sshnaidm should consider it as well I think.. may help for debug when an openstack ansible module test fails | 15:56 |
| artom | weshay|ruck, doesn't openstack-ansible use sdk and not osc? | 15:56 |
| weshay|ruck | artom, it does use the sdk | 15:56 |
| artom | arxcruz, "more work" is why not :) I'm the first to try to convince my DFG to close BZs as quickly as possible if it's justified :P | 15:57 |
| weshay|ruck | but I was thinking of that test as a second opinion on the $call it's making | 15:57 |
| weshay|ruck | not sure it's a good idea.. but thinking about it | 15:57 |
| artom | weshay|ruck, I guess the sdk is less of a problem because to my knowledge 1. we don't backport anything, so any upstream functional testing is fine and 2. our customers don't actually use it | 15:58 |
| *** jmasud has joined #oooq | 15:58 | |
| weshay|ruck | artom, it's used.. :) | 15:59 |
| artom | Ah, via openstack-ansible I guess | 15:59 |
| weshay|ruck | at least in the deployment.. and customers are asking for it | 15:59 |
| artom | Which ooo calls | 15:59 |
| artom | But... then it's being tested that way | 15:59 |
| artom | We tend to notice quickly when deployments don't finish ;) | 15:59 |
| weshay|ruck | only after a long lunch | 16:03 |
| ysandeep | bhagyashris|away, I am updating commit msg of https://review.opendev.org/#/c/744007/1 , this is a branchless project - seems porting c7 to c8 jobs was missed earlier for this repo | 16:09 |
| bhagyashris|away | ysandeep, opps | 16:10 |
| ysandeep | bhagyashris|away, done | 16:11 |
| bhagyashris|away | ok | 16:11 |
| bhagyashris|away | thanks | 16:11 |
| ysandeep | :) my pleasure | 16:12 |
| bhagyashris|away | ysandeep, degarding depends on stuff you were point me ... regarding that i will take look tomorrow | 16:12 |
| bhagyashris|away | regarding * | 16:12 |
| ysandeep | bhagyashris|away, sure.. good night o/ | 16:13 |
| *** udesale_ has quit IRC | 16:13 | |
| bhagyashris|away | Good night ! | 16:13 |
| arxcruz | weshay|ruck: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1888244 should be fixed now | 16:17 |
| openstack | Launchpad bug 1888244 in tripleo "jobs are failing in ci.centos when installing tempest-skiplist - The task includes an option with an undefined variable. The error was: 'zuul' is undefined" [Critical,In progress] - Assigned to Arx Cruz (arxcruz) | 16:17 |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|away | 16:17 | |
| arxcruz | I had yatin's blessing, it was passing locally on my box as well, I hope ci centos doesn't have some weird configuration | 16:17 |
| arxcruz | odyssey4me: hey man, it worked, I'm getting an error now in something different, but it worked | 16:18 |
| arxcruz | odyssey4me: regarding the openstacksdk | 16:18 |
| *** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off | 16:22 | |
| odyssey4me | arxcruz: excellent :) that's a nice, clean way of getting the newer sdk | 16:23 |
| arxcruz | odyssey4me: btw, i didn't care to check for the clouds.yml because stein and queens don't create it at all :) | 16:24 |
| arxcruz | and also i wanted to see the results and not wait for 6 more hours | 16:24 |
| odyssey4me | arxcruz: yeah, it's just a misleading task name then | 16:24 |
| arxcruz | i still need to tweak some stuff though, so i'll update it | 16:25 |
| *** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk | 16:25 | |
| weshay|ruck | arxcruz, k.. thanks /me retriggers | 16:25 |
| weshay|ruck | here we go https://review.opendev.org/#/c/738375/ | 16:36 |
| weshay|ruck | please review https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:c7-to-c8-train+(status:open+OR+status:merged) | 16:37 |
| chkumar|rover | see ya tomorrow people | 16:42 |
| weshay|ruck | chkumar|rover, 0/ | 16:48 |
| weshay|ruck | thanks | 16:48 |
| *** derekh has quit IRC | 16:50 | |
| *** rlandy has joined #oooq | 17:02 | |
| *** jpena is now known as jpena|off | 17:04 | |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: hi - did panda say anything about the internal promoter? | 17:06 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, he said phooooy.. jk | 17:07 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, didn't talk to him | 17:07 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, thought you had an access issue | 17:08 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: no - I just thought he was going to update the internal promoter code | 17:08 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, can you help me w/ some reviews please? https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:c7-to-c8-train+(status:open+OR+status:merged) | 17:08 |
| weshay|ruck | rfolco, ^ | 17:08 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: yeah ... he | 17:08 |
| rlandy | panda's here tomorrow, right? | 17:08 |
| rlandy | or I need someone to sit with me while we update and cherry pick | 17:09 |
| weshay|ruck | don't know | 17:09 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: if not, you're it | 17:09 |
| rlandy | tomorrow afternoon | 17:09 |
| rlandy | we will never clear the component pipeline | 17:09 |
| rlandy | or promoter anything 16.2 without it | 17:09 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, we will manually promote if needed | 17:09 |
| weshay|ruck | internal should be easy.. can do it now if you want | 17:10 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: not good enough | 17:10 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, k | 17:10 |
| rlandy | we need to relink all images, dockerfiles | 17:10 |
| weshay|ruck | k.. that's a ln -s | 17:10 |
| weshay|ruck | ma od | 17:10 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, done it before | 17:10 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: tomorrow we can make a decision ... but I would prefer to try get the changes into the internal promoter | 17:11 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, fyi.. updated your patch re: dep-pipeline | 17:11 |
| weshay|ruck | minor change | 17:11 |
| rlandy | otherwise we will live here forever | 17:11 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, k | 17:11 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, I'm out of context w/ when panda said he'd be available | 17:11 |
| * rlandy gets off soap box and looks at reviews | 17:11 | |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, I can ping him if needed | 17:11 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, we talked about the promoter a lot in the planning mtg | 17:12 |
| weshay|ruck | I can update you if you want | 17:12 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: np - will try catch him tomorrow - I probably misunderstood | 17:12 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: where is the sprint planning now? jira? taiga? | 17:12 |
| weshay|ruck | jira | 17:12 |
| weshay|ruck | let's chat.. I'll catch you up | 17:13 |
| weshay|ruck | https://meet.google.com/xci-wsjb-zdm | 17:13 |
| rlandy | ok | 17:13 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/21683/ | 17:17 |
| *** ysandeep|away is now known as ysandeep | 17:19 | |
| weshay|ruck | http://promoter.rdoproject.org/centos8_ussuri.log | 17:52 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, ^ | 17:52 |
| *** sanjayu__ has quit IRC | 17:53 | |
| rfolco | rlandy, I created a sub-task for your user story TRIPLEOCI-65 | 18:25 |
| rfolco | so we track work on sub-tasks, not directly in the user story | 18:26 |
| rlandy | rfolco: I moved TRIPLEOCI-68 - was that the wrong one? | 18:26 |
| rfolco | rlandy, no, you had moved 65 :) its not a big deal, but lets track work on sub-tasks instead so we see them in the same view | 18:27 |
| rlandy | rfolco: sorry - can we move it back | 18:27 |
| rfolco | rlandy, Its ok now, we have the sub-task created and its in progress column | 18:28 |
| rlandy | rfolco: apologies - newbie here | 18:28 |
| *** ysandeep is now known as ysandeep|away | 18:28 | |
| rfolco | rlandy, nah, you're good. | 18:28 |
| rfolco | rlandy, thx | 18:29 |
| rlandy | rfolco: so I | 18:29 |
| rlandy | 'm supposed to track on hackMD? | 18:30 |
| rlandy | and just link on this card? | 18:30 |
| rfolco | rlandy, you have at least to create a sub-task and track progress on that sub-task (under a user story, which links to an epic) | 18:30 |
| rlandy | ok | 18:30 |
| rfolco | rlandy, how often you update and how much its up to you | 18:31 |
| rfolco | rlandy, if you want to add a link only to hackmd in the description, thats also good | 18:31 |
| rfolco | but the task needs to be there so we track everything on the same board | 18:31 |
| rfolco | the sub-task* | 18:31 |
| rfolco | only create a task if it is not under any user story... otherwise create a sub-task under the user story | 18:32 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, you recall the issue I mentioned in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/741633/7 | 18:47 |
| rlandy | reading | 18:47 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: yeah - you have a comment there | 18:48 |
| rlandy | There have been issues w/ pulling the dlrn hash from mirrors. This is error prone and causes jobs to pull the wrong content. | 18:48 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, ya.. promoter was out of space.. worked on master this time | 19:03 |
| weshay|ruck | https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos8-master/ | 19:03 |
| rlandy | great | 19:03 |
| weshay|ruck | ussuri is next | 19:03 |
| weshay|ruck | chkumar|rover, ^ fyi | 19:04 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: voted on https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:c7-to-c8-train+(status:open+OR+status:merged) | 19:10 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, thanks | 19:12 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, https://review.opendev.org/#/c/743759/ | 20:01 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: looks good | 20:02 |
| *** jfrancoa has quit IRC | 20:05 | |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: ok - think we have it now ... search for 'rdo-jobs/playbooks/dependency/get-dependency-repo-content.yaml' on the consoles on both jobs on testproject21683,50 | 20:07 |
| rlandy | one is the cr job - no new content | 20:07 |
| rlandy | the second is extras (fake job) with content | 20:08 |
| rlandy | as long as the log collects | 20:08 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: now we need to add to container updates | 20:08 |
| weshay|ruck | aye | 20:10 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, actually .. we may not | 20:11 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, we don't update containers w/ any baseos changes | 20:11 |
| weshay|ruck | however.. it may be a good idea to do it in these jobs | 20:11 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: is that true for all dependencies? | 20:11 |
| rlandy | we can switch update on the repo itself | 20:12 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, so let's chat for a sec | 20:12 |
| rlandy | update_container: true | 20:12 |
| rlandy | one sec - let me check that | 20:12 |
| weshay|ruck | https://meet.google.com/mde-wmoy-gbp | 20:12 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:dos_docker.io+(status:open+OR+status:merged) | 20:19 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, job.build_container_images | 20:19 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=build_container_images&i=nope&files=&repos= | 20:20 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, arxcruz latest patch failed | 20:28 |
| * weshay|ruck checking it | 20:28 | |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: ci.centos? | 20:28 |
| weshay|ruck | I think it's because the python interp is not in the python ansible modules | 20:28 |
| weshay|ruck | and it's trying /bin/python | 20:28 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, ya.. in ci.centos | 20:28 |
| rlandy | ... /o\ | 20:28 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: worth to skip that job in criteria for the moment? | 20:30 |
| rlandy | which: no virtualenv in (/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin/) | 20:34 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: ^^ that error? | 20:34 |
| *** TrevorV has quit IRC | 20:50 | |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, well.. we could try merging that patch | 20:53 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: can you link patch? | 21:17 |
| rlandy | https://logserver.rdoproject.org/83/21683/50/check/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-8-standalone-centos8extras-master/4d4eaed/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/ | 21:18 |
| rlandy | hmmm ... and no repoquery list | 21:18 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: so we collect out of /home/zuul or home/zuul/workspace? | 21:19 |
| rlandy | k - one more time with container builds | 21:34 |
| *** chem has quit IRC | 21:38 | |
| *** sshnaidm is now known as sshnaidm|afk | 21:42 | |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, home/zuul | 21:59 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: ok - that was the mistake | 22:08 |
| rlandy | corrected in the change running now | 22:08 |
| rlandy | https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/stream/bf42a225e9fc426f8d72ad89a2f9a7c7?logfile=console.log building containers | 22:10 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/21683/ - all three obs | 23:08 |
| rlandy | jobs | 23:08 |
| weshay|ruck | nice | 23:08 |
| rlandy | got the repoquery list now | 23:08 |
| * weshay|ruck looks | 23:08 | |
| rlandy | let's just check the containers use the new repo | 23:09 |
| rlandy | https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/28775/ - job definitions | 23:09 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: want me to add an ovb job with image build? | 23:10 |
| * rlandy adds that next | 23:10 | |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, not tonight.. well.. I guess we just need to add something to the undercloud install role in tqe to import build_containers | 23:11 |
| weshay|ruck | like what's done for standalone eh? and test_project w/ deps | 23:11 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, go after that tomorrow | 23:11 |
| weshay|ruck | it's really late | 23:11 |
| weshay|ruck | these jobs look perfect | 23:11 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: I got two hours to kill on the fast | 23:11 |
| weshay|ruck | ha.. | 23:11 |
| weshay|ruck | then program away | 23:11 |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy, /me trying to build a little python client to abandon old patches | 23:12 |
| weshay|ruck | holy crap my gerrit is ughly | 23:12 |
| rlandy | weshay|ruck: wow - now I have to build the repoquery module | 23:12 |
| rlandy | feeling left out | 23:12 |
| * rlandy goes to shop - back in a bit | 23:12 | |
| *** rlandy is now known as rlandy|biab | 23:13 | |
| weshay|ruck | :) | 23:13 |
| *** tosky has quit IRC | 23:14 | |
| *** jbadiapa has quit IRC | 23:24 | |
| weshay|ruck | rlandy|biab, when you get back.. hook /me w/ a +2 on vex -> rdo please https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/28704/ | 23:26 |
| *** artom has quit IRC | 23:32 | |
| *** artom has joined #oooq | 23:40 | |
| arxcruz | weshay|ruck: rlandy|biab it requires the python-virtualenv package, wondering why is not being installed... :/ i'll write a patch for that | 23:41 |
| weshay|ruck | arxcruz, 0/ | 23:42 |
| weshay|ruck | is it like 2am there? | 23:42 |
| weshay|ruck | arxcruz, python-virtualenv should be on the system w/ tq | 23:43 |
| weshay|ruck | arxcruz, you see my patch? | 23:43 |
| weshay|ruck | am I totally off base? | 23:43 |
| arxcruz | weshay|ruck: not on overcloud | 23:43 |
| arxcruz | weshay|ruck: i haven't let me check | 23:43 |
| weshay|ruck | what? | 23:43 |
| weshay|ruck | arxcruz, wtf are we doing on the overcloud? | 23:43 |
| arxcruz | sorry, undercloud | 23:44 |
| arxcruz | so, os_tempest runs on undercloud | 23:44 |
| arxcruz | os_tempest do some calls to python_venv_build that requires python-virtualenv | 23:44 |
| weshay|ruck | arxcruz, k.. ya.. there is no python-virtualenv there | 23:45 |
| arxcruz | jesus, this bug is haunt me | 23:45 |
| weshay|ruck | lolz | 23:45 |
| arxcruz | weshay|ruck: I'll install the python-virtualenv in the tempest playbook before run os_tempest | 23:45 |
| weshay|ruck | arxcruz, http://paste.openstack.org/show/796481/ | 23:47 |
| weshay|ruck | arxcruz, qq.. json from gerrit.. any guess what time format this is? 'createdOn': 1595889723, | 23:48 |
| weshay|ruck | epoch? | 23:48 |
| weshay|ruck | ya.. | 23:50 |
| weshay|ruck | >>> datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(1596150278) | 23:50 |
| weshay|ruck | arxcruz, go to sleep :) | 23:50 |
| weshay|ruck | or atleast have a beer while you type | 23:50 |
| arxcruz | weshay|ruck: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/744084/ | 23:55 |
| arxcruz | done | 23:56 |
| arxcruz | i'll ping the people on osa tomorrow morning | 23:56 |
| weshay|ruck | arxcruz, and not having any path in the modules is ok? | 23:56 |
| weshay|ruck | why no #!/usr/bin/python | 23:56 |
| arxcruz | weshay|ruck: yes, it works we don't call the module directly | 23:57 |
| weshay|ruck | k | 23:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!