Wednesday, 2019-03-27

*** mjturek has quit IRC00:06
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset053, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp_1supp-featureset039,  (3 more messages)00:27
*** dsneddon has quit IRC00:40
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq00:57
*** jbadiapa has quit IRC01:23
*** jbadiapa has joined #oooq01:23
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset053, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp_1supp-featureset039,  (3 more messages)02:27
*** ykarel|away has joined #oooq02:52
*** apetrich has quit IRC03:15
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC03:32
*** dsneddon has quit IRC03:35
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq03:37
*** ykarel|away has joined #oooq03:46
*** udesale has joined #oooq03:46
*** ykarel|away is now known as ykarel03:57
*** raukadah is now known as chandankumar04:02
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset035, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario012-standalone, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp_1supp-featureset039, tripleo-ci- (3 more messages)04:27
*** udesale has quit IRC04:44
*** rh-jelabarre has quit IRC04:46
*** udesale has joined #oooq04:46
*** saneax has joined #oooq04:49
*** ratailor has joined #oooq05:41
*** skramaja has joined #oooq06:21
*** jaosorior has quit IRC06:26
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset035, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario012-standalone, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp_1supp-featureset039, tripleo-ci- (3 more messages)06:27
*** jaosorior has joined #oooq06:28
*** quiquell|off is now known as quiquell06:31
*** apetrich has joined #oooq06:52
quiquellmarios: o/06:56
marios_|ruckquiquell: \o06:57
quiquellmarios_|ruck: did it work the override-checkout ?06:59
marios_|ruckquiquell: stuff merged 3 hours ago https://review.openstack.org/#/c/644912/07:00
marios_|ruckquiquell: ah07:00
marios_|ruckquiquell: no07:00
marios_|ruckquiquell: i mean we ddin't use it i abandoned that07:00
marios_|ruckquiquell: sshnaidm|rover fixd it so we get proper delorean repo with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/645562/07:01
quiquellahh we have the --exclude option now07:01
marios_|ruckquiquell: no no exclude07:01
marios_|ruckquiquell: we have image source stuff, so it will exclude grafana as its openshift in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/644912/1/tripleo_common/image/kolla_builder.py07:01
marios_|ruckquiquell: for the branch calculation, sshnaidm|rover added that here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/645562/5/roles/tripleo-repos/tasks/main.yml so when we call tripleo-repos we'll get stable/rocky tripleo-ci-testing delorean07:02
marios_|ruckquiquell: so should be good07:02
marios_|ruckquiquell: well, we find out today :D07:02
marios_|ruckquiquell: for --excludes "we'll see"07:03
marios_|ruckquiquell: no run yet today so next periodic run we'll see what happens there https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?job_name=periodic-tripleo-centos-7-rocky-containers-build-push07:05
quiquellmarios_|ruck: ok, so tripleo-repos are now branch_override aware, ack07:05
quiquellmarios_|ruck: will check jobs07:06
ykarelmarios_|ruck, more work is needed, i commented on your abandoned patch07:06
ykarelcan you check07:06
quiquellykarel: what patch ?07:06
quiquellmarios_|ruck: do you have super powers here https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/19021/ ?07:07
ykarelmarios_|ruck, quiquell https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/19746/07:07
quiquellykarel: sshnaidm|rover bypassed it with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/645562/07:08
ykarelquiquell, no ^^ is not enough07:09
quiquellykarel: do we still need it ?07:09
ykarelas tripleo common is used from source07:09
ykarelin that job07:09
ykarelsee kolla-build.conf07:09
quiquellykarel: I see07:09
ykarelso u need to rely on zuul07:09
quiquellmarios_|ruck: ^07:09
ykareli must have checked the testing review yesterday, i missed those07:10
quiquellykarel: you are talking about this ? template_override={{ openstack_git_root }}/tripleo-common/container-images/tripleo_kolla_template_overrides.j207:11
marios_|ruckykarel: o/ ack so you think we may need that still https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/19746/ the override checkout?07:11
ykarelquiquell, yes07:11
marios_|ruckykarel: do we have logs yet?07:11
marios_|ruckykarel: i mean the c herrypick at 09:00 < marios_|ruck> quiquell: stuff merged 3 hours ago https://review.openstack.org/#/c/644912/07:12
marios_|ruckykarel: so i was waiting for next run07:12
quiquellmarios_|ruck: looks like we need it, tripleo_kolla_template_overrides.j2 is taking from git clone not from RPMs07:12
ykarelmarios_|ruck, master is checked out, we need to checkout stable/rocky07:12
ykarelsee inventory.yml07:12
ykareland kolla-build.conf07:12
ykarel^^ will make things clear07:12
marios_|ruckquiquell: ykarel thanks (yeah i saw ykarel pointer). ok cool. well we need both then i mean rocky tripleo-ci-testing delorean repo for packages in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/645562/ and then also override for zuul reequired projects07:13
marios_|rucksec restoring07:13
ykarelyes exactly07:13
marios_|ruckykarel: quiquell so sec, sshnaidm|rover said he might post something to set those but upstream lemme see if he did07:14
quiquellmarios_|ruck: well, is better to just checkout rocky07:14
marios_|ruckhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/647719/ maybe here sshnaidm|rover ? cc ykarel quiquell  see https://review.openstack.org/#/c/647719/4/zuul.d/build-containers.yaml07:15
quiquellykarel: do you know when are we going to have stable/stein branch at projects ?07:15
ykarelquiquell, you mean tripleo projects?07:16
ykarelnon tripleo already cut stable/stein07:16
*** jfrancoa has joined #oooq07:16
quiquellykarel: yep07:16
quiquellmarios_|ruck: that looks like a testing review to play with override-checkout07:17
ykarelquiquell, possibly next week: Apr 01 - Apr 05 R-107:17
ykarel    Final RCs and intermediary releases07:17
quiquellykarel: so master will be train ?07:17
ykarelquiquell, as per schedule ^^, but exact dates jaosorior emilien might know07:18
quiquellykarel: ack thanks!07:18
quiquellmarios_|ruck: btw did we take any decision with the zuul reproducer or something ?07:19
ykarelmarios_|ruck, that job is different, there is override-checkout, so we need same in rdo jobs07:20
ykarelnot sure if there is plan to run branchfull job upstream07:20
marios_|ruckykarel: ack i restored it so lets merge it then please thanks07:22
marios_|ruckquiquell: like what kind of decision you mean07:22
ykarelmarios_|ruck, +A07:23
quiquellykarel: can you +A this https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/19021/ ?07:24
ykarelmarios_|ruck, override-checkout patch merged, can you fire a test job(rocky-container-build-push) in testproject master branch07:26
marios_|ruckykarel: in master? why not rocky07:26
ykarelmarios_|ruck, we need to same as done in periodic pipeline07:27
marios_|ruckykarel: but we won't get the rocky exceptions07:27
ykarelexceptions?07:27
marios_|ruckykarel: like that stuff https://review.openstack.org/#/c/645562/5/playbooks/tripleo-buildcontainers/templates/build.sh.j2 and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/645562/5/playbooks/tripleo-buildcontainers/run.yaml07:28
marios_|ruckykarel: ok anyway doing master sec (we'll see rocy in a bit when periodic runs )07:28
quiquellmarios_|ruck: to emulate pariodic running testproject at master is the way07:28
marios_|ruckquiquell: kk07:28
quiquellmarios_|ruck: periodic runs as master, if some of the code there is not running right it have to be fixed07:28
ykarelmarios_|ruck, periodic already ran07:29
ykarelfor rocky07:29
ykareland failed07:29
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|lunch07:29
marios_|ruckykarel|lunch: oh i didn't see it in zuul builds earlier07:31
ykarel|lunchzuul builds are reported after periodic pipeline finishes, currently master is still running07:32
ykarel|lunchfor current run you can see https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/status07:32
* ykarel|lunch leaving07:32
marios_|ruckykarel|lunch: thx enjoy lunch07:32
quiquellbiab07:33
*** quiquell is now known as quiquell|brb07:33
marios_|ruckquiquell|brb: ykarel|lunch https://review.rdoproject.org/r/1976807:36
quiquell|brbhave to be run at master branch07:38
quiquell|brbto emulate periodics07:38
quiquell|brbso we see how override-checkout works07:39
*** matbu has quit IRC07:39
marios_|ruckquiquell|brb: its master test project but https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/19768/1/.gitreview rock there i thought is what we wanted?07:41
marios_|ruckquiquell|brb: so even there master? ^07:41
marios_|ruckquiquell|brb: cos then we run rocky job for master branch?07:41
quiquell|brbmarios_|ruck: you have checkout stable/rocky brach in the review07:43
quiquell|brbmarios_|ruck: I see "Branch stable/rocky"07:43
quiquell|brbhave to be master07:43
quiquell|brbdo a checkout on master and cherry pick it07:43
marios_|ruckquiquell|brb: k07:43
quiquell|brbat testproject07:43
marios_|ruck(updated)07:43
quiquell|brbso we verify that override-checkout is doing the right thing07:43
*** kopecmartin|off is now known as kopecmartin07:43
quiquell|brback, now it's07:44
marios_|ruckquiquell|brb: but now why is it stable/rocky07:44
marios_|ruckdamn it07:44
quiquell|brbnope still rocky07:44
marios_|ruckquiquell|brb: sec07:44
quiquell|brbok have to leave now07:44
marios_|ruckquiquell|brb: ack ttyl thanks07:44
marios_|ruckhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/19769/ quiquell|brb ykarel|lunch07:46
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej07:58
*** holser_ has joined #oooq08:05
*** quiquell|brb is now known as quiquell08:08
*** tosky has joined #oooq08:17
sshnaidm|rovermarios_|ruck, o/08:23
*** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel08:25
marios_|rucksshnaidm|rover: \o08:26
quiquellsshnaidm|rover: I am going to add a task about prometheus here https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/us/849?milestone=22304908:26
quiquellsshnaidm|rover: And going to start with it, ack ?08:26
sshnaidm|roverquiquell, let's discuss it before08:27
quiquellsshnaidm|rover: blue ?08:27
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset035, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario012-standalone, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp_1supp-featureset039, tripleo-ci- (3 more messages)08:27
sshnaidm|roverquiquell, yeah, in 10 min08:27
marios_|rucksshnaidm|rover: did you check the grafana error with the promotion reporting yesterday?08:27
marios_|rucksshnaidm|rover: can i do something there08:27
sshnaidm|rovermarios_|ruck, oh, not yet, will look now08:27
quiquellack08:27
marios_|rucksshnaidm|rover: thanks08:28
ykarelmarios_|ruck, ack08:29
*** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur08:32
ykarelamoralej, can you look https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/19744/08:35
ykarelopenstack/requirements is branched08:35
amoralejok08:36
amoralejlet me check08:36
marios_|rucksshnaidm|rover: ah i think grafana is ok its the time filter08:37
amoralejykarel, we need to coordinate that with the update of dlrn configs08:37
amoralejdid you talk to jpena?08:37
ykarelamoralej, yes, jpena pushed patches08:37
sshnaidm|rovermarios_|ruck, yeah, I see it's reporting master etc08:37
marios_|rucksshnaidm|rover: i was confused cos i saw wes note on the etherpad but when i change the time to last 7 days for example it shows. i guess maybe the default time range changed?08:37
amoralejok08:37
marios_|rucksshnaidm|rover: k thanks08:37
sshnaidm|rovermarios_|ruck, maybe yesterdays restart helped08:38
marios_|rucksshnaidm|rover: k08:38
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq08:38
marios_|rucksshnaidm|rover: so here it says master promoted 23rd https://dashboards.rdoproject.org/master but grafana says 21st08:41
marios_|rucksshnaidm|rover: and phase 1 master on 23rd at ^^ but not in grafana08:42
sshnaidm|rovermarios_|ruck, k, will look08:42
marios_|rucksshnaidm|rover: thx08:42
sshnaidm|rovermarios_|ruck, can you please create a bug about 030 failing in master promotions? http://logs.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic/git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-7-multinode-1ctlr-featureset030-master/6f15af3/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/overcloud_deploy.log.txt.gz08:43
marios_|rucksshnaidm|rover: ack looking08:43
sshnaidm|rovermarios_|ruck, we need to look at master failures08:44
marios_|rucksshnaidm|rover: added in etherpad08:51
*** bogdando has joined #oooq08:53
quiquellsshnaidm|rover: just tested the telegraf output for prometheus and it works out of the box08:55
quiquellsshnaidm|rover: without chaing the recollecting scripts :-)08:56
sshnaidm|roverquiquell, can't we execute scripts just from prometheus?08:56
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena08:56
quiquellsshnaidm|rover: nope08:56
quiquellsshnaidm|rover: it just listten to http stuff08:56
quiquellsshnaidm|rover: It does not start scripts, there is something like exporters but you have to run them yourself08:57
quiquellsshnaidm|rover: telegraf + prometheus is good for us08:57
sshnaidm|roverquiquell, blue?09:02
quiquellyep09:03
marios_|ruckerrand biab09:18
*** d0ugal has quit IRC09:18
quiquellsshnaidm|rover: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/19776/09:36
quiquellThis is it09:36
ykarelmarios_|ruck, are the CIX care created automatically or manually?09:36
ykarelactually asking because seeing new Labels09:36
*** derekh has joined #oooq09:39
quiquellzbr|ssbarnea: ping09:39
zbr|ssbarneaquiquell: hi09:40
quiquellzbr|ssbarnea: The stein release file is at workable state ?09:40
zbr|ssbarneaquiquell: yes, please help merging it https://review.openstack.org/#/c/643963/09:40
zbr|ssbarneais cannot progress without merging this first.09:40
quiquellzbr|ssbarnea: we have to wait for stable/stain branch to test it I supose09:41
zbr|ssbarneaquiquell: no need to wait.09:42
quiquellzbr|ssbarnea: or we can just merge to have it and fix next week09:42
zbr|ssbarneaquiquell: this is what i was trying to say for the last week, merge now so we can test periodic ones, and fix eventual issues.09:43
zbr|ssbarneawithout these, we would never be able to push stein containers which are key for any deployment. we need it for bootstrapping stein09:44
quiquellzbr|ssbarnea: have some comments https://review.openstack.org/#/c/643963 at master.yaml09:44
zbr|ssbarneaquiquell: addressed, look again.09:51
zbr|ssbarnea@oooq:  on f28 we need to be bure we install dnf-plugins-core rpm or we may get error about missing config-manager. make no assumption.09:53
quiquellWhy you don't remove   {# dnf-plugins-core provides config-manager command #} ?09:53
quiquellStill this things are not related to stein09:54
quiquellAdd a new review for them09:54
*** matbu has joined #oooq09:54
zbr|ssbarneabecause each extra patch adds one extra day delay (if lucky)09:55
zbr|ssbarneastein is first f28 release, so it makes sense to be the same (to me).09:56
quiquellacke let's just merge it09:58
quiquellmarios_|ruck, sshnaidm|rover: Can we just merge the stein release file ? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64396309:58
sshnaidm|roverquiquell, looking09:58
sshnaidm|roverquiquell, does ceph should be luminous?09:59
sshnaidm|roverfultonj, ^^09:59
zbr|ssbarneaquiquell: also remember that stein is the only f28 release. so even if I touch the master file, is only for stein.10:00
zbr|ssbarneafedora28 will be removed in from master when we have centos-810:01
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq10:01
zbr|ssbarneabut i will create a separate change, to make people happy.10:01
quiquellzbr|ssbarnea: f28 master will be train10:01
quiquellzbr|ssbarnea: But I see is good that stein/master have same things10:02
quiquellzbr|ssbarnea: So I am all good there10:02
zbr|ssbarneaquiquell: that is what i was trying to explain, is needed for both. anyway, I spoke with wes and we both want to refactor the release files so we remove some of the duplication between them. too much identical stuff is spread in multiple files.10:03
zbr|ssbarneait makes very easy to fix a bug in only one place and having to redo it for the other cases ;)10:04
quiquellzbr|ssbarnea: yep, nah let's merge this and fix I think10:04
quiquellzbr|ssbarnea: well will add complexity too as always10:04
sshnaidm|roverzbr|ssbarnea, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/643963 commented10:09
marios_|ruckquiquell: looking10:09
marios_|ruckykarel: i created thos manually10:10
marios_|ruckykarel: i mean i added 2 today for the blockers10:10
zbr|ssbarneasshnaidm|rover: debatable, comment is to prevent accidental removal from code, not from the output of the templated file.10:10
ykarelmarios_|ruck, ack, and the labels there were added intentionally?10:10
zbr|ssbarneasshnaidm|rover: not sure what is the value of getting a comment in a final file, the value is at source.10:10
sshnaidm|roverzbr|ssbarnea, not critical, I'm worried more about comments in file10:11
zbr|ssbarneasshnaidm|rover: but i am not strong about it, i can easily make it a bash commend instead of jinja.10:11
marios_|ruckykarel: yeah please fix if they are wrong or tell me and i'll fix10:11
ykarelmarios_|ruck, actually as per bug, these are TripleO CI10:11
ykarelso not COmponent CI, RDO label10:12
ykarelso TripleO-stein label10:12
marios_|ruckykarel: ack thanks fixing10:12
ykarelmarios_|ruck, if it start failing apart from TripleO stein jobs, u can add others, for now as per bug these affecting just TripleO stein10:13
marios_|ruckykarel: ack thanks10:13
zbr|ssbarneasshnaidm|rover: now i see, 2nd set of comments. mainly they were copied from master.10:15
quiquellzbr|ssbarnea: found typo10:15
zbr|ssbarneaadd now, as I am fixing the comments noted by sshnaidm|rover10:15
*** dsneddon has quit IRC10:16
quiquellzbr|ssbarnea: nah false alarm was at my code of the mitter :-)10:17
quiquellemitter10:17
quiquellzbr|ssbarnea: yep little typo at the stein release file https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64396310:19
quiquellextra s there10:19
quiquellMy standalone-upgrade job with stein emitter was failing is testing it10:19
zbr|ssbarneaquiquell: not minor. thanks10:20
quiquellzbr|ssbarnea: let me rerun the emitter review so we exercise the release file10:25
zbr|ssbarneaam i wrong to wonder if we need new dlrn urls now?10:25
quiquellthe use release10:25
quiquellso they are different from master already10:25
zbr|ssbarneai am looking at the values of rdo_dlrn and tripleo_dlrn and I see that for fedora we do not use os version10:26
chandankumarsshnaidm|rover: I am renaming the project from tripleo-collect-logs to ansible-role-collect-logs as it is going to be consumed by other openstack project as suggested by alex10:27
sshnaidm|roverchandankumar, cool10:27
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset035, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario012-standalone, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp_1supp-featureset039, tripleo-ci- (3 more messages)10:27
zbr|ssbarneaeven if I compare master c7 with f28 there are some naming discrepancies which worry me a bit, especially as we introduce stein now.10:27
marios_|rucksshnaidm|rover: did you manage tolook at grafana (sorry for harras i am preparing the program call status). esp that i see phase 1 at https://dashboards.rdoproject.org/master but not grafana (from 23rd promotion)10:32
zbr|ssbarneawho can hint me about the purpose of docker_openshift_tag, seems to differ between c7/f2810:34
zbr|ssbarnearfolco: sshnaidm|rover : please look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/648070/1 -- i started to split the change to make it easy to review. better if you can also diff the two files.10:36
quiquellzbr|ssbarnea: missing yatin's comments on latest ps aka s/fedora/fedora28/10:39
zbr|ssbarneaquiquell: wow, glad to see that we have consistent urls now, https://trunk.rdoproject.org/fedora28-master/ :D updating it....10:40
zbr|ssbarneai am going to add a variable that would expand to centos7 or fedora28, any names? distro_ver sounds ok?10:43
quiquellzbr|ssbarnea: don't do the refactor there10:44
quiquelllet's just merge the stein release file10:44
quiquellthen we do the refactor10:44
zbr|ssbarneaquiquell: i will refactor few things before, to avoid extra work (not in the stein change)10:44
*** holser_ is now known as holser|lunch10:47
zbr|ssbarneaquiquell: sshnaidm|rover ykarel : please check https://review.openstack.org/#/c/648070/2 -- this should ease our stein branching.10:54
marios_|ruckzbr|ssbarnea: did you miss ykarel comments https://review.openstack.org/#/c/643963/1110:55
zbr|ssbarneamarios_|ruck: not really, look at my review, i am doing the refactoring first, before stein. i will rebase stein change on top of refactoring.10:56
quiquellzbr|ssbarnea: then is going to take ages to  merge man10:57
zbr|ssbarneayeah. but we need to fix it before. it will be faster this way.10:57
quiquellzbr|ssbarnea: now we have to test that all jobs are working fine10:58
quiquellzbr|ssbarnea: not just new rlease for for stein10:58
marios_|ruckzbr|ssbarnea: ack11:03
*** zbr|ssbarnea has quit IRC11:06
*** zbr has joined #oooq11:07
sshnaidm|roverarxcruz, kopecmartin chandankumar any ideas about https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1821690 ? Should we exclude this test until it's fixed?11:16
openstackLaunchpad bug 1821690 in tripleo "periodic-ovb-1ctlr_1comp-featureset020-master fails tempest test_auto_allocate_network tempest.api.compute.images.test_images" [Undecided,Triaged] - Assigned to Marios Andreou (marios-b)11:16
arxcruzsshnaidm|rover: yes, defintively skip for now11:17
arxcruzsshnaidm|rover: i'm still investigating it11:17
sshnaidm|roverarxcruz, can you add a patch please?11:17
arxcruzmaybe the problem is with the micro version11:17
arxcruzsshnaidm|rover: sure11:17
sshnaidm|roverthanks11:17
*** jtomasek has quit IRC11:18
sshnaidm|rovermarios_|ruck, we so close to master promotion, but 030 is failing :(11:18
chandankumarsshnaidm|rover: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:add-ansible-role-collect-logs+(status:open+OR+status:merged) done11:18
marios_|rucksshnaidm|rover: thats the new bug from today  right. yeah i mean we need to fix but we are kinda yellow for program call since we at least had a promotion in last 7 days11:19
arxcruzchandankumar: why raukadah ?11:19
ykarelsshnaidm|rover, may be can promote by skipping fs020 result and promote hash from yesterdays, as only 1 test failing11:19
marios_|rucksshnaidm|rover: so we'll fix that by next couple days i expect the bug i mean ... would love to get rocky working too :D11:19
ykarelmarios_|ruck, i think there is a fix for fs030, i think i saw a related patch11:20
sshnaidm|rovermarios_|ruck, I hope to have fix for 030 today already, called for people..11:20
ykarelin tht11:20
marios_|rucksshnaidm|rover: ack thanks11:20
sshnaidm|roverykarel, oh, is it there? Seems like without bug mention11:21
ykarelyes11:21
ykarellet me find link11:21
ykarelsshnaidm|rover, possibly https://review.openstack.org/#/c/647738/11:22
ykarelgood to get confirmation from hjensas or ramishra11:22
ykarelif ^^ is the fix or not11:22
chandankumararxcruz: /me is doing some testing11:22
arxcruzchandankumar: ?11:23
arxcruzsorry, ykarel  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/647738/ fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1821690  ?11:24
openstackLaunchpad bug 1821690 in tripleo "periodic-ovb-1ctlr_1comp-featureset020-master fails tempest test_auto_allocate_network tempest.api.compute.images.test_images" [Undecided,Triaged] - Assigned to Marios Andreou (marios-b)11:24
ykarelarxcruz, not ^^, that's related to fs03011:24
zbrsshnaidm|rover: thanks! also do you happen to know how this bash construct is supposed to work? https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/blob/4e9c605600711b89029168bca35f34e2f542f941/config/release/tripleo-ci/Fedora-28/master.yml#L5111:28
zbri never used this kind of explansion, and apparently it does render as the first variable ( fedora_stable value)11:29
zbrwhich is always defined, so not sure what is the purpose, looks more of a mistake to me11:29
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq11:29
quiquellzbr: +2 there11:33
quiquellzbr: let's wait for CI and we workflow it11:33
*** ratailor has quit IRC11:37
quiquellzbr: are we missing creating containers for stein ?11:39
quiquellzbr: same as https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/task/887?kanban-status=1538166 but for containers11:39
sshnaidm|roverzbr, supposed to work, usually, it substitutes https://trunk.rdoproject.org with $NODEPOOL_RDO_PROXY11:42
arxcruzykarel: ack11:44
chandankumararxcruz: just looking a new/unique nick name so created one!11:46
chandankumar*for a11:46
arxcruzchandankumar: :)11:48
arxcruzsshnaidm|rover: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/648099/11:48
sshnaidm|roverarxcruz, thanks11:49
fultonjsshnaidm|rover: in stein ansible whould be 2.7 and ceph should be nautilus; we're trying to get that all working together as per https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/18721/11:52
sshnaidm|roverzbr, ^^11:53
chandankumararxcruz: I am coverting one of the scenario1 to os_tempest if it is ok? to see how much it break?11:54
fultonjif you want to support python3 + ansible2.7 + podman + ceph, then the only supported ceph is nautilus with ceph-ansible 4.x11:54
fultonjzbr: ^11:54
arxcruzchandankumar: did you see the tasks i create ?11:55
fultonjluminous --> ansible 2.6 + ceph-ansible3 + python2 + cent + docker11:55
fultonjwas mentioned yesterday at tripleo meeting11:56
chandankumararxcruz: so many tasks, lookin each of them11:56
chandankumararxcruz: thanks for doing that11:56
arxcruzchandankumar: i believe we are going to need more, sorry, with all tempest stuff happening last week, i haven't time to do it earlier11:58
fultonjfmount: ^ fyi11:59
chandankumararxcruz: yes, for tempestconf profile part I think I got the idea, I donot to change anything on os_tempest side  may be https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25129728/ansible-override-single-dictionary-key11:59
chandankumarthis will do the magic11:59
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq12:00
fmountfultonj: ack12:00
quiquellsshnaidm|rover, marios_|ruck: To get changes at baremetal jobs https://review.openstack.org/#/c/647580/12:00
arxcruzchandankumar: cool :)12:01
*** quiquell is now known as quiquell|lunch12:01
*** jtomasek has quit IRC12:05
sshnaidm|roverquiquell|lunch, "openstack/tripleo-ci-internal-jobs" ?12:07
sshnaidm|roverquiquell|lunch, where does it exist?12:07
quiquell|lunchsshnaidm|rover: internal gerrit12:11
quiquell|lunchcode.engineering...12:11
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq12:12
*** rlandy has joined #oooq12:13
*** jtomasek has quit IRC12:13
*** trown|outtypewww is now known as trown12:17
sshnaidm|roverquiquell|lunch, and it's in openstack/ namespace?12:18
marios_|ruckquiquell|lunch: call will check after12:18
quiquell|lunchsshnaidm|rover: yep12:18
sshnaidm|roverquiquell|lunch, ok12:19
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq12:25
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset053, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp_1supp-featureset039,  (3 more messages)12:27
zbrykarel: thanks for spotting the diff deps vs base-stable: here is the updated version https://review.openstack.org/#/c/648105/12:28
ykarelzbr, ack12:29
zbrykarel: i am trying to consolidate configs before adding stein ones, to avoid extra work after.12:30
ykarelzbr, ack, but remember to check those changes are tested in some job to avoid breakages12:31
kopecmartinsshnaidm|rover, arxcruz the tests was skipped even before it was failing, we just didn't now it was failing because tempest.conf wasn't configured to run that test .. so skipping is fine, at least now12:36
rlandyrfolco: ping re: https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/task/888?kanban-status=144727512:42
rfolcoo/ rlandy12:43
rlandyrfolco: hi - the link you ask to review points to standalone doc.12:43
rfolcorlandy, really ?12:43
rfolcorlandy, please ignore and click on the attachment12:43
rlandyrfolco: ok - there are two attachments12:44
rfolcooh dammn12:44
rlandyone for bm and one for standalone12:44
rfolcowrong file12:44
rfolcoI am sorry12:44
rfolcofizing12:44
rfolcofixing12:44
rlandyI see the b, png12:45
*** jpena is now known as jpena|lunch12:46
rfolcorlandy, please check again12:46
rfolcoI did not hide any ips, just replaced mac addr with FF:FF...12:47
*** holser|lunch is now known as holser_12:48
*** udesale has quit IRC12:48
rlandyrfolco: ok - I see it now12:49
*** udesale has joined #oooq12:49
rfolcorlandy, just do a quick review pls, and I'll submit first patch to tripleo-docs. I just don't want to expose things that may compromise us.12:50
rlandyk12:50
rfolcorlandy, coz once you submit a patchset upstream, there is no way to delete it12:50
quiquell|lunchrfolco: do we need to manually put some containers at stein?12:58
quiquell|lunchrfolco: need that to debug the emitter review12:58
rfolcoquiquell|lunch, yes... we need to sync on that. zbr may get something maybe?12:59
quiquell|lunchRfo12:59
quiquell|lunchrfolco: can't we just do a docker push manually from promoted stuff at master?12:59
rfolcoquiquell|lunch, in theory yes. That's exactly what wes said we should do.13:00
quiquell|lunchRfo13:00
rfolcoquiquell|lunch, check with zbr if he is going to do this, otherwise please help with this task13:00
rfolcoquiquell|lunch, wtf is Rfo13:00
rfolco:)13:00
quiquell|lunchrfolco: is there any task ?13:00
quiquell|lunchrfolco: that's me not hiring tab autocompletion13:01
quiquell|lunchHiting13:01
rfolcozbr, you there? have you tried pushing master containers as stein?13:01
*** quiquell|lunch is now known as quiquell13:02
rfolcoquiquell, good point, I don't see where this work would fit, it is worth to create a new user story IMO13:03
rfolcoquiquell, creating13:03
quiquellWill take care of it13:03
rfolcoquiquell, excellent!! Just talk/sync w/ zbr about it13:04
quiquellzbr: ping13:05
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch13:06
quiquellrfolco: have you created dthe user story or I create it ?13:06
quiquellrlandy: rocky running now at bm dlrn trigger13:07
rfolcoquiquell, creating13:07
rlandyquiquell: ack - thanks for merging that13:07
rfolcosomeone knocking my door13:08
rlandyquiquell: just checking the hashes now on the master job13:08
rfolcoquiquell, https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/us/91513:08
quiquellrfolco: is missing the epic13:09
quiquellrfolco: is this ?  #837 Branch master to Stein13:09
rfolcoquiquell, yes13:10
rfolcocorrect13:10
quiquellrfolco: so we have manully do a promotion at stein and I have to take the containers from there13:11
quiquellrfolco: is that it ?13:11
rfolcoquiquell, isn't the last promotion enough ?13:12
rfolcoquiquell, pull master containers from last promotion and push them back to tripleostein namespace13:12
rfolcoquiquell, would this work ?13:13
*** vinaykns has joined #oooq13:13
quiquellrfolco: depends on where current-tripleo is pointing to at stein13:13
rfolcoquiquell, will be out for 15 min brb... and we sync when I get back13:14
quiquellsure13:14
quiquellthanks dude13:14
rfolcoty13:14
rlandyquiquell: we are getting failures on mater bm we do not see in ovb13:16
rlandywaiting for the last of the patch to merge and then we should see the same pass rate13:16
rlandyif not, we have a problem13:16
rlandyquiquell: moving your dlrn triggering card to done13:17
*** aakarsh has quit IRC13:18
quiquellrlandy: ack, you mean the build-test-packages patch ?13:18
rlandyquiquell: the bm one - it was in QE13:19
rlandyquiquell: looking at this error: https://sf.hosted.upshift.rdu2.redhat.com/logs/periodic-hourly/code.engineering.redhat.com/openstack/tripleo-ci-internal-jobs/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-7-bm_envD-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-master/7df8cd7/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/overcloud_deploy.log.txt.gz#_2019-03-27_08_40_3913:21
rlandyovb on the same hash passed13:21
quiquellTASK [container-registry : enable and start docker]13:23
quiquellthis is the one failing13:23
quiquellpython exception is just in the middle of ansible logs13:24
quiquellrlandy: ... aren't we supose to be using podman ?13:25
quiquellrlandy: there is no docker daemon there13:26
rlandyquiquell: comparing with ovb13:26
quiquellrlandy: what's the OVB counterpart ?13:28
rlandyquiquell: we should be per https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/blob/master/config/general_config/featureset001.yml#L16213:28
rlandyquiquell: http://logs.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic/git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-master/4550981/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/13:29
rlandy^^ ovb equivalent13:29
rlandyquiquell; there is no container specific code in http://git.app.eng.bos.redhat.com/git/tripleo-environments.git/tree/hardware_environments/hp_dl360_envD/network_configs/single_nic_vlans/env_settings.yml13:31
*** jpena|lunch is now known as jpena13:32
rlandyhttp://logs.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic/git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-master/4550981/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/overcloud_deploy.log.txt.gz has the same docker lines13:32
quiquellyep13:32
rlandyquiquell: looks like more an access issue - maybe because we are not in rdocloud13:32
quiquellwhat container specific do we need there13:32
rlandymissing registry access13:32
quiquellhummm13:32
quiquellbut this is a daemon restart13:32
quiquelldocker daemon restart does not try to access I think13:32
rlandyhere is where periodic and check differ13:33
*** mjturek has joined #oooq13:33
quiquellLet's find error at docker restart13:33
rlandyhttps://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/blob/master/config/release/tripleo-ci/CentOS-7/promotion-testing-hash-master.yml#L413:35
rlandy^^ different in regular master13:35
*** matbu has quit IRC13:35
quiquellrlandy: controller-2 is doing a enable/start docker and working fine13:36
quiquellrlandy: ripleo-ci-internal-jobs/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-7-bm_envD-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-master/7df8cd7/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/overcloud_deploy.log.txt.gz#_2019-03-27_08_40_0613:37
* rlandy check network masquerade13:37
rlandytripleo::masquerade_networks::masquerade_networks: {'10.12.150.0/26': ['10.12.150.0/26'], '10.12.150.64/26': ['10.12.150.64/26']}13:37
rlandythat is right13:37
quiquellrlandy: where are te logs for overcloud-novacompute-0  ?13:39
quiquellis the machine still up ?13:39
rlandyquiquell: hmm - there are none - my guess is it is not accessible13:39
rlandymachine should still be up13:40
rlandycheck it13:40
rlandychecking it13:40
quiquelllet's ssh to nova node13:40
rlandyyep doing that13:41
quiquelljust try to do enable/start by hand13:41
quiquellof docker daemon and see what happend13:41
rlandywow13:42
rlandycan't get on node13:42
quiquellups...13:42
quiquellbut ansible is able to access13:42
rlandy(undercloud) [zuul@undercloud ~]$ ssh heat-admin@10.12.150.2113:42
rlandyUnable to get valid context for heat-admin13:42
rlandyLast login: Wed Mar 27 13:41:49 2019 from 10.12.150.113:42
rlandyConnection to 10.12.150.21 closed.13:42
quiquellmaybe there were network issues13:42
rlandysame error13:42
rlandysomething is up there13:42
rlandywe could before13:42
Tenguoverloaded system?13:42
*** matbu has joined #oooq13:42
rlandyit's baremetal13:42
* Tengu remembers of some overloaded baremetal system at his previous job13:43
rlandyusually an selinux error, no?13:43
quiquellrlandy: hummm i see that at logs13:44
Tenguhttps://access.redhat.com/solutions/1982653  ?13:44
rlandyI have not seen that before13:44
rlandy(undercloud) [zuul@undercloud ~]$ getenforce13:44
rlandyEnforcing13:44
rlandy^^ wonder if that is correct13:44
*** aakarsh has joined #oooq13:45
quiquellrlandy: but this is selinux of the undercloud13:45
quiquellrlandy: what about selinux of the nova node ?13:45
rlandyquiquell: it is13:45
quiquellrlandy: maybe you can go ingot one of the overcloud controllers13:46
quiquelland check selinux13:46
rfolcoquiquell, zbr do we need to talk about stein containers or this is already clarified ? please update user story with whatever approach we'll be using.13:46
quiquellrfolco: didn't progress on that13:46
rlandyquiquell: do you want me to tmate you in?13:46
rlandyidk what the nova compute node ip is on that network13:47
quiquellrlandy: ok let's add a pair of eyes there13:47
rfolcoquiquell, tmate w/ rlandy on bm issue, we bj later w/ some expert in dlrn hashes, maybe sshnaidm|rover13:48
quiquellrfolco: ok13:48
rlandyk - exiting and starting tmate13:48
quiquellrlandy: I am in13:50
rlandyquiquell: pls open your window more13:50
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away13:52
marios_|rucksshnaidm|rover: any idea about that one https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1821744?comments=all /me staring at the deploy command and environment files13:52
openstackLaunchpad bug 1821744 in tripleo "various jobs failing for overcloud deploy with missing cluster error: Could not connect to cluster (is it running?)", "" [Critical,Triaged]13:52
marios_|ruckhttp://logs.rdoproject.org/45/560445/291/openstack-check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001/126a766/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/overcloud-deploy.sh13:52
sshnaidm|rovermarios_|ruck, asked bandini to look into it13:52
marios_|rucksshnaidm|rover: cool thanks13:53
quiquellrlandy: ovb rdocloud -> overcloud_image_url: http://images.rdoproject.org/{{ release }}/rdo_trunk/{{ dlrn_hash|default(dlrn_hash_tag) }}/overcloud-full.tar13:57
*** matbu has quit IRC13:57
rlandyquiquell: yeah  - we do not have that in virt deployment13:57
rlandywe should use the one from relaese file13:57
rlandyhttps://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/blob/master/config/release/tripleo-ci/CentOS-7/promotion-testing-hash-master.yml#L2413:58
rlandyquiquell: ^^13:58
*** matbu has joined #oooq13:59
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC13:59
rlandyquiquell: we need to check which one take preference in ovb14:00
rlandyrelease or env14:00
quiquellrlandy: they don't point to the same ?14:01
quiquellrlandy: where is the env for bm ?14:01
*** Vorrtex has joined #oooq14:01
quiquellrlandy: or are we using the same as ovb ?14:01
rlandyquiquell: no  - we replace with http://git.app.eng.bos.redhat.com/git/tripleo-environments.git/tree/hardware_environments/hp_dl360_envD/network_configs/single_nic_vlans/env_settings.yml14:01
rlandysays nothing about images14:01
rlandythe bm one is blank14:01
rfolcorlandy, quiquell may be a stupid suggestion... but... # guestfish -i --rw -d <image> touch /.autorelabel14:01
quiquellso we use release14:02
quiquellrfolco: it's working at OVB14:02
rlandy2019-03-27 07:23:17.755811 | primary | TASK [setup/undercloud : Perform selinux relabel on undercloud image] **********14:03
rfolcoor14:04
rfolcosh “/sbin/setfiles -q /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/files/file_contexts /”14:04
quiquellrlandy: can we access the nova using the drac ?14:04
quiquellrlandy: I have like a virtual monitor ?14:05
quiquellrlandy: so we access without ssh ?14:05
rlandyquiquell: ack but we would have to log in14:05
rlandyI can get iLO14:05
rlandybut you won't be able to log in from outside the undercloud14:05
quiquellrlandy: just to ensure that is not a ssh issue in that case we can do some investigations14:05
quiquellrlandy: there is no password for that user :-/14:06
rlandyheat-admin no14:06
Tenguhmm so it's a baremetal overcloud with some weird/failing SSH/other right?14:06
quiquellTengu: yep14:07
quiquellTengu: error is similar to this https://superuser.com/questions/1224284/linux-console-unable-to-get-valid-context-for14:07
quiquellTengu: and OVB is working fine with the same DLRN hash14:07
Tenguduh... is there a way to get the grub invit and hack its boot?14:08
quiquellTengu: like runing /bin/bash at kernel options ?14:08
Tenguyeah, or the "right" rhel way14:08
quiquellTengu: what's that ?14:08
quiquellTengu: from iLO I suppose we can do that14:09
Tengudon't remember, I saw that once or twice while trying to get back my centos. wait.14:09
Tenguquiquell: it's rhel7 right?14:09
quiquellTengu: centos714:09
rlandyquiquell: I think OVB has a diff image14:10
rlandyhttp://images.rdoproject.org/master/rdo_trunk/a8f9a6277055e2c106c2af4f4c56766d417c0cd6_128c9cd8/overcloud-full.tar'14:10
Tenguquiquell: systemd.unit=emergency.target  instead of the "init=/bin/bash"14:11
Tengusource: https://www.thegeekdiary.com/centos-rhel-7-how-to-boot-into-rescue-mode-or-emergency-mode/14:11
rlandya8f9a6277055e2c106c2..>2019-03-27 09:11- vs current-tripleo/2019-03-24 08:56-14:11
quiquellTengu: thanks!14:11
Tenguthat's the official way for rhel based systems14:11
quiquellrlandy: so OVB is using release file14:12
* rlandy checks order of arguments14:13
Tenguquiquell: wondering if a root password is needed for that kind of target. there's also "rescue.target" btw.14:13
quiquellTengu: no clue14:13
Tengunot sure which one I used back then in order to save my local server...14:13
quiquellLet's see first the rlandy discovery on images14:14
quiquellLooks like OVB and BM are using different ones14:14
Tenguthat would make sense imho...14:14
Tengudrivers and the like?14:14
rlandyquiquell: ack ... /home/zuul/src/git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/toci-quickstart/config/testenv/ovb-rdocloud.yml is passed after release file14:15
Tenguquiquell: so apparently the issue is also the same I pointed from the Access thingy.14:15
quiquellrlandy: so release file has preference14:15
rlandyquiquell: no the ovb-rdocloud env does14:15
rlandythe file passed last takes pref14:16
quiquellahh after14:16
quiquellrlandy: humm that's weird14:16
rlandyquiquell: ok - we can fix this to match ovb14:16
quiquellrlandy: yes but14:16
rlandyquiquell: truth is release file is wrong14:16
rlandypromotion testing should take hash14:16
quiquellthe OVB job was a check job14:17
quiquellcheck job has to use tripleo-current for images14:17
quiquellisn't it ?14:17
rlandyquiquell: no periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-master14:17
quiquellrlandy: ahh was periodic14:17
rlandyquiquell; ack - check jobs takes current-tripleo14:17
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej14:17
rlandythe comparison job was periodic though14:17
quiquellrlandy: periodics should take current14:17
quiquellrlandy: or tripleo-ci-testing ?14:18
rlandylatest14:18
rlandychecking what hashes match what dates14:18
quiquellrlandy: is not tripleo-ci-testing ? since this is the tag we use before running periodics14:18
rlandytripleo-ci-testing/2019-03-27 09:11-14:18
rlandymatches14:18
quiquellmake sense14:18
rlandya8f9a6277055e2c106c2..>2019-03-27 09:11-14:18
quiquellcool14:19
*** sshnaidm_ has joined #oooq14:19
*** sshnaidm_ is now known as sshnaidm|bbl14:19
rlandyquiquell: so - rdocloud jobs are always using latest14:19
rlandyquiquell: even in check14:19
rlandyinteresting , no???14:19
quiquelleven in check ?14:19
rlandythis to me is wrong ...14:19
rlandyquiquell: yeah  - check order of arguments14:19
quiquellcould be considered the images like tripleo projects ?14:19
rlandyhttps://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/blob/master/config/release/tripleo-ci/CentOS-7/promotion-testing-hash-master.yml#L2414:20
quiquelltripleo projects at taken from latest at check jobs14:20
rlandy^^ why not latest hash??14:20
quiquellThis has to be tripleo-ci-testing14:20
rlandyquiquell: ack - putting in patch14:20
quiquelland for IPA too14:20
rlandyquiquell: we should question ovb at tomorrow's meeting14:20
rlandylet the team weigh in14:21
quiquellYep14:21
rlandyyou can see the results in the logs14:21
*** sshnaidm|rover has quit IRC14:21
quiquellrlandy: let's just add temporally the correct url to the BM env file14:21
quiquellrlandy: to see if it works now14:21
quiquellrlandy: for oc and API14:21
quiquells/API/IPA/g14:22
quiquellTengu: we will see how it goes with same images, if not let's go back to hack into images14:22
*** sshnaidm|bbl has quit IRC14:22
quiquellTengu: thanks btw14:22
rlandyquiquell: ack - I can temp merge a change in tripleo-envs for that14:22
rlandyquiquell: hold on - changes coming up14:22
quiquellrlandy: ack at the end is what OVB wrongly do :-)14:22
rlandyquiquell: the release file is wrong and OVB is wrong14:23
Tenguquiquell: np :). I quit the tmate - feel free to call me if you want some more help.14:23
rlandybut we are not seeing it because both files are passed14:23
quiquellrlandy: let's make BM correctly wrong14:23
rlandyTengu: we will let you know14:23
rlandyok - wrongly correcting BM14:24
quiquellthat's the proper permutation14:24
rlandythis is why I love BM - it finds all the holes14:24
quiquellso, we were running check with latest images14:25
quiquellat OVB14:25
quiquelllet's check master.yaml though14:25
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset053, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp_1supp-featureset039,  (3 more messages)14:27
rlandyquiquell: https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/166315 Temp adding image path to env file14:28
rlandyquiquell: ^^ merging this14:29
quiquellrlandy: yep, I don't have +2 there14:29
rlandyquiquell: done - now exiting out of hardware14:29
quiquellrlandy: let's just wait for next spin14:30
rlandyquiquell: yep - next time we get a periodic run, we check images14:30
quiquellwe can enforce periodic at check, but it's going to run in half hour I think14:30
rlandyquiquell: it's the only thing I can think of that is diff in the check vs the periodic14:30
quiquellrlandy: BM at check was working fine ?14:31
quiquellrlandy: release file for periodic and check are the same there14:31
quiquellrlandy: same IP and oc url14:32
rlandyquiquell: ack - we can access nova in check14:32
rlandyquiquell: but in check the repos and images match14:32
quiquellrlandy: humm there is something weird14:32
quiquellrlandy: ansibe was able to access nova14:32
quiquellI think14:32
rlandyquiquell:env B ran master check14:32
rlandyyou can look at that env14:33
rlandywe have two diff envs14:33
rlandytwo running rocky14:33
rlandytwo running master14:33
rlandyone check one periodic14:33
* rlandy check env B in tmate14:33
quiquellI think I have close tmate :-(14:33
rlandyyou can connect again14:34
quiquellthis is check ?14:36
rlandyquiquell: ack - it's check14:38
rlandyI am waiting for my last patch to mergs14:38
rlandyquiquell: then will run check again to see if master passes14:38
quiquellrlandy: still I see the same content at both periodic and check release files14:39
quiquellrlandy: so how so images at check are alright ?14:39
rlandyquiquell: because at check the repos match the iamges14:39
quiquellrlandy: ahh that's right14:40
quiquellrlandy: repos for tripleo are at latest14:40
quiquellrlandy: and for the rest at current-tripleo14:40
rlandyquiquell; in theory, the repos should update the images14:40
quiquelllet's just wait14:40
rlandyquiquell: but with overcloud not sure that happens14:40
rlandyquiquell: either way, we need to match the OVB workflow14:41
rlandyso that is what I am doing here14:41
quiquellrlandy: sure14:41
quiquellrlandy: good catch though14:41
rlandyquiquell: we'll see14:41
rlandyI may not have fixed the problem14:41
quiquellLet's see what's next:-)14:41
rlandyquiquell; rerunning check now to see14:43
quiquell wait14:44
quiquelldo the periodic at check hack to use the correct release file14:44
quiquellso we mimic it14:44
rlandyyes - but I actually want to see if that env is needed for debug for https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/182174414:45
openstackLaunchpad bug 1821744 in tripleo "various jobs failing for overcloud deploy with missing cluster error: Could not connect to cluster (is it running?)", "" [Critical,Triaged]14:45
*** sshnaidm|bbl has joined #oooq14:48
*** ykarel|away has joined #oooq14:53
*** derekh has quit IRC14:53
*** ratailor has joined #oooq14:54
*** ykarel|away is now known as ykarel14:58
marios_|ruckzbr: any update on stein containers? was it you looking there ? rfolco cc alex is asking in tripleo14:59
*** sshnaidm|bbl has quit IRC15:00
quiquellmarios_|ruck: this is about pushing master containers to tripleostein ?15:02
quiquellmarios_|ruck: we have just created a user story for it https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/us/915?milestone=22304915:02
quiquellmarios_|ruck: I needed it to test the changes at emit releases script15:03
marios_|ruckquiquell: yeah15:03
quiquellzbr: I was planning on doing manual pushing https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/us/915?milestone=22304915:04
zbrquiquell: if you know how to doit, please to it manually, it can only help15:04
quiquellzbr: ack will do it15:05
rfolcoquiquell, do you know how to do it or need help ?15:10
quiquellrfolco: I have the creds and all15:11
rfolcoquiquell, let me know if you need help, looks like this is blocking all other stein work15:12
*** sshnaidm|bbl has joined #oooq15:15
marios_|ruckarxcruz: chandankumar o/ hey this came up today in escalation call any updates for it https://trello.com/c/DfQAjJrJ/819-cixlp1802971tripleociproa-tempest-volumebootpattern-and-basicops-running-concurrently-causing-timeouts15:17
arxcruzmarios_|ruck: so, there's nothing else to do, it can be moved to done, we are more covered as i exlain in my comment15:19
arxcruzmarios_|ruck: I comment on the card15:20
quiquellhumm15:20
quiquellrfolco: so this is current-tripleo for stein https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-stein/current-tripleo/commit.yaml15:20
marios_|ruckarxcruz: ack cos last comment was 'ill post results here' but there wasn't follow up hence this ping ok thanks for update15:21
arxcruzmarios_|ruck: sorry, my bad, it's very easy to lost the track on all things we do in several different tools15:21
arxcruzi wasn't able to start working properly on this sprint with all tempest things... :/15:21
marios_|ruckarxcruz: it's ok. i will forgive you. this one time.15:21
arxcruzmarios_|ruck: efcharisto gia tin kalosyni sou15:22
rfolcoquiquell, what is the risk in using this hash?15:22
quiquellrfolco: how to I map between that hash and the containers ?15:23
quiquellat master ?15:23
marios_|ruckarxcruz: de nada15:23
rfolcoquiquell, dunno, I'll do some research15:26
rfolcomaybe rlandy knows?15:26
quiquellI think we have to rebuild the images15:26
quiquellThe containers I mean15:27
zbrykarel: i combined fixes, i hope now https://review.openstack.org/#/c/648070/ is ok, this being the 1st in a long chain.15:30
rlandyrfolco: notes on https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/task/888?kanban-status=1447275]15:31
ykarelzbr, looks like you missed comment15:31
rlandyrfolco: maybe I know what?15:31
rfolcorlandy, how to push stein containers from master ones15:32
quiquellrlandy: do you know how if it's possible to map a stein DLRN hash to master containers ?15:32
rfolcorlandy, thanks for reviewing 88815:32
quiquellrlandy: Or we are force to build them ?15:32
quiquellrfolco: since stein and master are still the same15:32
rlandyquiquell; hmmm ... I don't really - what do you mean by map exactly15:33
zbrykarel: not sure what is wrong with comment other than a minor typo?15:33
quiquellrlandy: We need to have some containers at tripleostein container repo15:33
rlandyquiquell: retag?15:33
rfolcoquiquell, rlandy just hacking our check job to push to tripleostein namespace ?15:33
quiquellrlandy: we were thinking about just pushing from tripleomaster to tripleostein15:33
ykarelquiquell, no stein and master are not same, they diverted as projects have created stable/stein, so they may differ15:33
quiquellykarel: so we have to build the containers15:34
*** matbu has quit IRC15:34
quiquellykarel: yep that's what I was finding out15:34
rfolcobrb15:34
ykarelzbr, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/648070/2..4/config/release/tripleo-ci/Fedora-28/master.yml15:34
ykarelLine 2015:34
quiquellrfolco: but we have to construct with correct repos and all15:35
*** udesale has quit IRC15:35
quiquellrfolco: so a containers-builds-push for stein need to be run15:35
quiquellrfolco: same we are doing with rocky15:35
ykarelzbr, and you can update commit message to include fedora_stable ugly hack removal part15:35
quiquellrfolco: but forcing to current-tripleo instead of tripleo-ci-testing15:35
ykarelas it seems you included in that patch15:36
quiquellmarios_|ruck: the rocky containers-build-push is working now '15:36
quiquellnow ?15:36
marios_|ruckquiquell: not green yet at https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?job_name=periodic-tripleo-centos-7-rocky-containers-build-push or not reported15:36
quiquellrfolco: have to drop now, will check doing it tomorrow15:36
marios_|ruckquiquell: the fail there is from before the fixes15:37
quiquellrfolco: at least containres-build-push does not depends on release file I think15:37
marios_|ruckbut no more recent yet15:37
quiquellmarios_|ruck: ack15:37
*** quiquell is now known as quiquell|off15:38
*** matbu has joined #oooq15:40
*** ratailor has quit IRC15:41
*** saneax has quit IRC15:43
zbrykarel: i have the impression that first bullet was about fedora-stable hack removal.15:43
*** holser_ has quit IRC15:43
*** saneax has joined #oooq15:44
ykarelmarios_|ruck, rocky container build job passed:- https://logs.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic/git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-centos-7-rocky-containers-build-push/52590a7/15:44
ykarelin current periodic run15:44
marios_|ruckykarel: thanks 'me was trying to find via zuul status looking15:44
marios_|ruckykarel: sshnaidm|bbl quiquell|off lgtm https://logs.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic/git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-centos-7-rocky-containers-build-push/52590a7/etc/yum.repos.d/delorean.repo.txt.gz https://logs.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic/git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-centos-7-rocky-containers-build-push/52590a7/logs/build.log.txt.gz and no excludes in https15:45
marios_|ruck\o/15:45
*** matbu has quit IRC15:45
ykarelzbr, that;s different 1st bullet15:46
ykarellooks like mixed reviews15:46
zbrykarel: ahh.. right.15:46
sshnaidm|bblmarios_|ruck, yay15:47
*** holser_ has joined #oooq15:47
zbrykarel: updated commit msg, ok now?15:48
ykarelzbr, looking, and l20 too?15:48
ykarelzbr, L20 not updated yet15:49
ykarelhttps://trunk.rdoproject.org/{{ distro_ver }} --> https://trunk.rdoproject.org/{{ distro_ver }}-{{ release }}15:50
ykarelthat was the main comment :) as per your patch you wanted the release file to be usable15:50
*** sshnaidm|bbl has quit IRC15:50
ykarelso i suggested doing that15:50
zbrykarel: sure, doing it not. and really thanks for help on this.15:51
ykarellooks like we are out of resources:- resources.baremetal_env.resources.openstack_baremetal_servers.resources[2].resources.baremetal_server: Went to status ERROR due to "Message: No valid host was found. There are not enough hosts available.,15:54
ykarelmarios_|ruck, ^^ seeing in a job15:54
*** holser_ has quit IRC15:54
zbrykarel: if we are at this section, lets resolve few other questions.  docker_openshift_tag should be the same for c7/f28?15:55
marios_|ruckykarel: you have link for me ?15:55
ykarelseeing some job went to retry_limit at https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/status15:55
ykarelmarios_|ruck, one example:- https://logs.rdoproject.org/openstack-periodic/git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/master/periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-rocky/d05cf41/job-output.txt.gz15:55
marios_|ruckykarel: thanks15:55
ykareli see only tihs15:55
marios_|ruckykarel: dam. hoping for rocky promotion15:55
marios_|ruckykarel: any idea what we can do about it? do we need to cancel jobs/restart them ?15:56
ykarelmarios_|ruck, first ask at rhos-ops15:56
ykarelif rdo cloud is out of capacity15:57
ykarelalso see other job logs to see how many jobs affected15:57
ykarelas i see some running also15:57
marios_|ruckykarel: ack pinged rhos-ops16:00
ykarelack16:00
marios_|ruckdon'tknow who to ping there its just before you joined the chan not sure who will see16:00
ykarelmarios_|ruck, ask kforde, alheran16:00
ykarelmarios_|ruck, also looking at https://zabbix.infra.prod.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/zabbix/screens.php?elementid=22416:02
ykarelseems only 33 vms possible with m1.large, i don't know how to read that16:03
marios_|ruckykarel: looking16:04
marios_|ruckykarel: thanks i've never seen this dash before16:05
ykarelnp, you can bookmark it or add to ruck/rover etherpad16:06
zbri guess that we should see things inside https://images.rdoproject.org/fedora28/ -- right? now is empty.16:06
*** saneax has quit IRC16:06
rlandyrfolco: quiquell|off: https://review.openstack.org/648170 promotion-testing-hash-* release file should use tripleo-ci-testing16:07
zbrovercloud_image_url seems to be pointing to https://images.rdoproject.org/master/ instead of https://images.rdoproject.org/centos7/master/ --- easy fix, BUT the /fedora28 folder is *empty*.16:07
rlandyzbr: ^^ fyi16:07
zbrykarel: rlandy: re https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/blob/master/config/release/tripleo-ci/Fedora-28/master.yml#L26-L27 -- my impression is that this urls are not correct, as we miss a the distro_ver part out of it.16:11
rlandyzbr: pls comment on review16:14
marios_|ruckykarel++16:16
hubbot1marios_|ruck: ykarel's karma is now 1316:16
marios_|ruckthanks16:16
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away16:16
ykarel|awaymarios_|ruck, i see notification fix released:- https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182079116:19
openstackLaunchpad bug 1820791 in tripleo "should use containers-default-parameters.yaml instead of /home/stack/containers-prepare-parameter.yaml for overcloud deploy" [Undecided,Fix released] - Assigned to yatin (yatinkarel)16:19
ykarel|awayi think you can readd fs030 to queens promotion criteria if it's passing16:19
ykarel|awayhttps://github.com/rdo-infra/ci-config/blob/master/ci-scripts/dlrnapi_promoter/config/CentOS-7/queens.ini#L2516:19
marios_|ruckykarel|away: ack16:21
marios_|ruckykarel|away: well was just skipped but will check (i mean the tempest stuff just merged the skip)16:22
marios_|ruckykarel|away: sorry confused it with master issue nm16:23
marios_|ruckhttps://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?job_name=periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-7-multinode-1ctlr-featureset030-queens16:23
marios_|ruckgreen run there ykarel|away ^ looks like16:23
ykarel|awayyes16:24
rlandymarios_|ruck: no worries on the ticket - I can delete those instances16:25
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset053, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp_1supp-featureset039,  (3 more messages)16:27
marios_|ruckykarel|away: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/1978816:27
marios_|ruckrlandy: thank you16:27
marios_|ruckrlandy: never done that before16:27
marios_|ruckdidn't even know about rhos-ops16:27
chandankumarsee ya guys tomorrow16:28
*** chandankumar is now known as raukadah16:28
*** dsneddon has quit IRC16:28
rlandymarios_|ruck: see https://github.com/rdo-infra/ci-config/tree/master/ci-scripts/infra-cleanup16:28
rlandymarios_|ruck: I just pulled the server part out of that to clean up16:28
marios_|ruckrlandy: --nuclear16:29
rlandywe needed it on monday as well16:29
marios_|ruck!16:29
rlandyNO NOT NUCLEAR16:29
marios_|ruckrlandy: i see. is it something we're doing wrong/? or we need capacity increase16:29
marios_|ruckor what16:29
marios_|ruckevery now and again we need a nuke16:29
marios_|ruckbut otherwise16:29
marios_|ruckwe're good16:29
rlandymarios_|ruck: really it could be anything16:29
rlandyI haven't been watching the env close enough to tell you what it is this time16:29
marios_|ruckrlandy: ack thanks16:29
rlandyprobably an outage of sorts16:30
marios_|ruckrlandy: thers been multiple outage/maintenance last few days if i recall on email list anyway  for rdo maybe related?16:30
marios_|rucklike jobs geting stuck in deleted during that ^ thn staying there?16:30
marios_|ruckeating resources for no reason whatsoever16:30
rlandyanyways you should see the number of error instances dropping16:31
rlandyscript is running16:31
*** trown is now known as trown|lunch16:35
marios_|ruckrlandy++16:36
hubbot1marios_|ruck: rlandy's karma is now 5016:36
marios_|ruckthank you16:36
*** jfrancoa has quit IRC16:43
*** sshnaidm|bbl has joined #oooq16:46
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq16:55
*** dsneddon has quit IRC17:01
*** bogdando has quit IRC17:05
*** kopecmartin is now known as kopecmartin|off17:10
* marios_|ruck out ttyl folks17:11
*** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk17:21
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq17:31
*** trown|lunch is now known as trown17:50
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off18:03
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC18:16
*** holser_ has joined #oooq18:22
*** zul has quit IRC18:23
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset053, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp_1supp-featureset039,  (3 more messages)18:27
zbrquiquell|off: sshnaidm|bbl marios_|ruck please revote on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/648070/18:36
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch18:42
*** holser_ has quit IRC19:33
rfolcorlandy, sshnaidm|bbl is away looks like19:37
rfolcowanted to understand how to push master containers to tripleostein namespace19:37
rlandysshnaidm|bbl; if you are not really bbl :) - can you join bj to help rfolco figure out ^^19:38
sshnaidm|bblrlandy, which blue?19:38
rlandyrfolco?19:38
rfolcohttps://bluejeans.com/587845809719:39
rfolcozbr, sshnaidm|bbl rlandy ^19:39
rfolcosync on stein containers19:39
zbrif anyone still here, it would be really helpful to wf https://review.openstack.org/#/c/648070/ today.20:27
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset035, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario012-standalone, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp_1supp-featureset039, tripleo-ci- (3 more messages)20:27
*** jtomasek has quit IRC20:27
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq20:28
*** Vorrtex has quit IRC20:28
*** mjturek has quit IRC20:31
*** fultonj has quit IRC20:34
*** fultonj has joined #oooq20:35
*** jtomasek has quit IRC20:35
rfolcorlandy, sshnaidm|bbl https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/19791/20:37
rfolcowhen you get a chance pls. I'll check it later to test in testproject, thanks for your help20:38
rlandyrfolco: commented20:42
rlandyI don't understand why we need to redefine the whole job20:42
sshnaidm|bblrfolco, better to define a job as normal stein job, like "rocky" is defined there, "push: false" you'll pass in testproject20:50
rfolcosshnaidm|bbl, ack20:50
rfolcoremoving push var override20:51
rfolcorocky was a copy we did not need to replicate all those vars from base job20:51
*** trown is now known as trown|outtypewww20:52
rfolcosshnaidm|bbl, rlandy good now ps3 ? https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/19791/20:54
rlandyrfolco: looks better to me20:57
rlandyrfolco: actually missed branch_override21:03
rlandycomparing to rocky21:03
rfolcothis is not needed21:04
rfolcobranch_override is a oooq thing for undercloud install21:04
rfolcoI can put it back, though21:04
rfolcowhat matters is checkout-override21:04
rfolcorlandy, correct me if i am wrong21:05
rlandyrfolco: juts following rocky pattern21:05
rfolcook lets not add any other noise21:05
rfolcorlandy, adding back21:05
rfolcorlandy, sshnaidm|bbl ready21:08
rlandyrfolco: ok - let's merge that so you can test21:09
rlandyit can't do harm21:10
rlandyas soon as zuul votes21:10
rfolcorlandy, thanks21:10
rlandyrfolco: it's workflowed21:11
rlandyyou can add a testproject job now to test - with push set to false21:11
rfolcogreat! rlandy do you get an example of testproject patch like that ?21:12
rlandyrfolco: have you ever used testproject?21:13
sshnaidm|bblrfolco, https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/19681/21:13
sshnaidm|bblrfolco, or that: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/19769/21:14
rfolcorlandy, sshnaidm|bbl thanks !!21:14
rlandyrfolco: you'll need to clone https://review.rdoproject.org/r/testproject21:15
rlandyand then add a .zuul.d like sshnaidm|bbl's review21:15
sshnaidm|bblrfolco, and need to depend on rlandys patch I think to run it21:15
sshnaidm|bblrlandy, do you have your periodic patch number?21:15
rlandyyep getting21:16
rfolcowhy depends-on a periodic patch ?21:16
rlandyhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/638756/21:16
rlandyso zuul considers your job periodic21:17
rfolcogot it21:17
rfolco:)21:18
rlandywatch the branch there as well21:18
sshnaidm|bblrlandy, commented on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/648195/21:19
sshnaidm|bblrfolco, rlandy branch should be master21:19
sshnaidm|bblall periodics run on master21:20
rlandysshnaidm|bbl: agree it's not the best place to put it21:20
rlandyin fatc I had to make another hack for bm21:20
rlandysshnaidm|bbl: I'll look for a more useful file to add that param to - but at least we know it fixes the problem21:21
sshnaidm|bblrlandy, yeah, that's great21:21
sshnaidm|bblrlandy, maybe ovb config in tht21:21
rlandysshnaidm|bbl: it's not just ovb though21:22
rlandyany thing that uses common/deploy-steps.j221:22
sshnaidm|bblrlandy, but multinode jobs pass fine21:22
rlandyweird, right - it should object21:22
rlandysshnaidm|bbl: probably because it's not HA21:24
rlandyand pacemaker picked up the problem21:24
sshnaidm|bblrlandy, seems like..21:25
rlandysshnaidm|bbl: it's late for you - I will put in the ovb_ha patch to get tested and we can discuss/confirm in tomorrow's meeting21:25
sshnaidm|bblrlandy, sure21:25
rlandysshnaidm|bbl: I feel like multinode will show some issue at some point ... but we'll see21:25
*** aakarsh has quit IRC21:35
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|bbl22:08
*** vinaykns has quit IRC22:18
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset035, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario012-standalone, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp_1supp-featureset039, tripleo-ci- (3 more messages)22:27
*** aakarsh has joined #oooq22:41
*** tosky has quit IRC23:27

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!