Tuesday, 2019-01-15

*** jbadiapa has quit IRC00:10
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario003-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario003-standalone @  (1 more message)00:25
*** tosky has quit IRC00:32
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario003-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario003-standalone @  (1 more message)02:25
*** saneax has joined #oooq02:31
*** sanjayu_ has joined #oooq03:14
*** saneax has quit IRC03:16
*** apetrich has quit IRC03:16
*** ykarel|away has joined #oooq03:42
*** udesale has joined #oooq04:05
*** udesale has quit IRC04:15
*** udesale has joined #oooq04:16
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario003-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario003-standalone @  (1 more message)04:25
*** udesale has quit IRC04:26
*** chkumar|out is now known as chandankumar05:38
*** ykarel|away is now known as ykarel05:38
*** ykarel has quit IRC05:43
*** ykarel has joined #oooq06:00
*** udesale has joined #oooq06:05
*** udesale has quit IRC06:12
*** udesale has joined #oooq06:13
*** ratailor has joined #oooq06:13
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario003-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario003-standalone @  (1 more message)06:25
*** udesale has quit IRC06:33
*** udesale has joined #oooq06:33
*** brault has quit IRC06:33
chandankumarmarios: quiquell \o/06:51
chandankumarmarios: quiquell please have a look at the spec review https://review.openstack.org/63065406:51
chandankumarthanks :-)06:51
quiquellWill do06:52
quiquellH06:54
marioso/ chandankumar ack06:55
*** jfrancoa has joined #oooq07:10
*** jbadiapa has joined #oooq07:15
*** kopecmartin|off is now known as kopecmartin07:35
*** rascasoft has joined #oooq07:44
*** apetrich has joined #oooq07:48
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq07:56
marioschandankumar: with batteries included :)08:11
*** panda|off is now known as panda08:19
*** ccamacho has quit IRC08:25
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario003-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario003-standalone @  (1 more message)08:25
*** jpena|off is now known as jpena08:33
chandankumarmarios: thanks, updated :-)08:34
*** holser_ has joined #oooq08:35
marioschandankumar: ack08:36
chandankumarmarios: quiquell need one more helo08:39
chandankumarmarios: quiquell in this review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/628421/ I am looking for a nicer way to handle rolepath https://review.openstack.org/#/c/628421/5/ansible.cfg@16 instead each time putting soemthing there if it is not discovered by TQ08:41
quiquellchandankumar: you role need to have a setup.py that install at correct paths08:41
chandankumarquiquell: it has alreadt08:41
quiquellso just having the requirements is enough08:41
quiquellthen you don't need to change ansible.cfg08:42
chandankumarquiquell: https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest/blob/master/setup.cfg#L2008:42
quiquellpip instdall -r requirements will install at correct place08:42
quiquellchandankumar: the you are good you don't need to hack ansible.cfg08:42
chandankumarquiquell: TQ venv looks for rolepath at virtualenv/usr/share08:43
chandankumarquiquell: but if we simply create venv localy it already prefix with /usr08:43
*** tosky has joined #oooq08:44
chandankumarquiquell: let me find the logs08:44
quiquellchandankumar: If we do the pip install in the venv the place should be correct08:45
quiquellchandankumar: If not you have to fix the role08:45
chandankumarquiquell: http://logs.openstack.org/00/627500/39/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-os-tempest/53d1b64/job-output.txt.gz#_2019-01-14_11_30_20_71292708:45
chandankumarquiquell: let me check another roles08:46
quiquellchandankumar: what's the repository of the role ?08:50
chandankumarquiquell: https://github.com/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_tempest08:54
chandankumarquiquell: I checked tripleo upgrade repo they are using /usr/share08:55
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|lunch08:55
chandankumarquiquell: https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-upgrade/blob/master/setup.cfg#L2208:55
*** chem has joined #oooq08:55
chandankumarquiquell: for https://github.com/openstack/ansible-role-tripleo-modify-image/blob/master/setup.cfg#L23 is share/08:55
chandankumarthings are incosistent here08:56
*** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur08:56
quiquellchandankumar: executing pip at venv with the os_tempest role instdall at .os_tempest/share/ansible/roles/os_tempest/08:57
quiquell.os_tempest is the venv dir08:57
quiquellchandankumar: you have to change stuff so it install at /usr/share/...08:58
chandankumarquiquell: yes, sure08:58
quiquellchandankumar: But I think you already know this08:58
quiquellchandankumar: I mean $VIRTUAL_ENV/usr/local/share/ansible/roles is the place the role has to install in08:59
chandankumarquiquell: my question is when installing in venv it already Using base prefix '/usr'08:59
chandankumarso i thought it is not needed but for system wide installation I need to fix to install in /usr/share09:00
quiquellchandankumar: but why not adding usr/ prefix to data_files ?09:01
quiquellWhat the issue with that ?09:01
quiquellq!09:02
chandankumarquiquell: no issue I am fixing that09:02
quiquellchandankumar: ack, so you only need this and quickstart should see it with its default ansible.cfg09:02
quiquellchandankumar: let me know09:02
quiquellchandankumar: btw, maybe you want to test the role with molecule09:02
chandankumarquiquell: on the list09:02
quiquellchandankumar: ack09:02
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq09:08
quiquellweshay: dashboard stuff workflowed, but maybe we need just a green/red box for noop instead of a guage09:08
arxcruz|ruckquiquell: but the noop should always be green right?09:09
quiquellarxcruz|ruck: yep, that's why a gauge des not make sense09:10
quiquellarxcruz|ruck: its kind of binary stuff09:10
quiquellarxcruz|ruck: green or red09:10
quiquellarxcruz|ruck: gauge is to show intermediate states09:10
quiquellarxcruz|ruck: maybe you want to try to change that09:10
*** bogdando has joined #oooq09:26
*** derekh has joined #oooq09:33
chandankumarquiquell: marios https://review.openstack.org/#/c/630917/09:49
quiquellchandankumar: Do you have test patches ?09:50
quiquellchandankumar: btw after merge this maybe is good that you put there some standalone job09:50
*** ratailor_ has joined #oooq09:52
*** ratailor has quit IRC09:55
pandasnape, snape, severus snape.10:06
*** jaosorior has joined #oooq10:09
quiquellsshnaidm: you there we have to talk about ssh keys and containers10:18
*** udesale has quit IRC10:25
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario003-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq- (2 more messages)10:25
sshnaidmquiquell, yep10:25
quiquellsshnaidm: so, looks like bind mounting with :z those kind of directories is not a good idea10:27
quiquellsshnaidm: it does a relabeling to share them, and removing :z does not work on centos7 (Maybe it should) fedora28 works fine without :z at ssh dir10:27
quiquellsshnaidm: so maybe we need to have Dockerfiles to inject ssh keys10:28
quiquellsshnaidm: genrated playbook that runs before10:28
sshnaidmquiquell, so you mean to build containers10:29
quiquellsshnaidm: yep at least th eones that use ssh keys10:29
quiquellsshnaidm: or to generate playbook with ssh embedded and run inside the container10:29
quiquellsshnaidm: also good thing abot building the containers is it can detect changes at config10:29
quiquellsshnaidm: and restart only needed services (but that's just an improvement)10:30
*** chandankumar has quit IRC10:31
sshnaidmquiquell, can we try w/o :z maybe, and with :Z, just for tests10:32
quiquellsshnaidm: without :z fedora28 passes but centos7 don't :-/10:32
sshnaidmquiquell, I'd like to avoid building, but if no choice..10:32
quiquellsshnaidm: lets try with :Z10:32
*** arxcruz|ruck has quit IRC10:34
quiquellok, launched let's see10:34
quiquellsshnaidm: I will try to generate playbook with ssh keys in it and run it inside containers10:34
*** udesale has joined #oooq10:35
*** chandan_kumar has joined #oooq10:35
sshnaidmquiquell, you mean to change containers locally?10:38
quiquellsshnaidm: even issier run a playbook before zuul commands that injects keys there10:39
quiquellsshnaidm: we have to be sure that we don't show the playbook at CI :-)10:39
quiquellsshnaidm: keys are inside the playbook embedded10:39
*** jtomasek has quit IRC10:40
sshnaidmquiquell, ok10:40
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq10:40
quiquellsshnaidm: we have to be sure that keeps people's dirs intact after repro is running10:40
quiquellsshnaidm: so bind mounting not repo dirs are not a good idea10:41
quiquellsshnaidm: in general10:41
*** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel10:42
pandajfrancoa: question on 63022810:45
jfrancoapanda: sure10:46
jfrancoapanda: I've just read your question in the patch. So, in an overcloud upgrade, you would first perform the undercloud upgrade to retrieve the last tht version you're going to upgrade your overcloud to10:47
jfrancoapanda: but as the standalone is a one-node-for-everything environment, you need to at least update python-tripleoclient and tripleo-heat-templates before running the upgrade10:48
jfrancoapanda: otherwise you're running the upgrade with the last release packages10:48
sshnaidmquiquell, we can mount readonly10:49
quiquellsshnaidm: Can you try it in the patch ?10:49
jfrancoapanda: in the end, the standalone upgrade right now is almost the same as an undercloud-upgrade, where you need to do the same...update the CLI packages and tht before running the uc upgrade10:49
sshnaidmquiquell, I mean for having dirs intact10:50
jfrancoapanda: anyway, I'll reply in the patch10:50
pandajfrancoa: so since the standalone is a hack, and is not consideres something that the customer sees, we cant' add part of the upgrade process for it, we resort to manually handling the part that is not considered official, then proceed with the rest ?10:50
pandaoh10:50
sshnaidmquiquell, I don't think it will help in selinux case..10:50
quiquellsshnaidm: no ?10:50
sshnaidmquiquell, no, but if we already try, will submit a patch :)10:51
pandajfrancoa: that is what I don't understand, why don't you take care of the package upgrade in the uprgrade command itself even for the undercloud ?10:51
pandajfrancoa: that is, why something that upgrades stuff is not included in the "upgrade" command :)10:53
quiquellsshnaidm: test it at your centos7 patch is the place of my experiments10:53
quiquellsshnaidm: only working solution a have there is doing a permissive selinux after repro :-(10:53
pandajfrancoa: honest question, I'm not criticiing the choice10:53
jfrancoapanda: so perform the needed packages update from the cli command?10:53
sshnaidmquiquell, I'll duplicate it10:53
quiquellsshnaidm: ack10:53
*** brault has joined #oooq10:54
*** apetrich has quit IRC10:54
pandajfrancoa: yes, this feels to me you're modifying the CI to get it to work, but the customers will not get this, and will have to perform another manual step (hoping it's written in the documentation)10:54
*** udesale has quit IRC11:01
jfrancoapanda: even though I'd add it in python-tripleoclient now, we would need to perform the package update by hand before the upgrade process step start (we would get the gain in next release from Train to R, because the packages updating would be already in the command itself. Anyway, the reason for this change is not to modify the CI to make it work, but the CI job wasn't testing the patch. As we create a repo with the build-test-pack11:02
jfrancoale and install-built-repo doesn't update that package (https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/commit/05b5b272f38217ce09bc0e9a4a484f97bffcd2e2#diff-3214758135904ff969021b2459a0781c ) we are never using the tripleo-heat-templates patch in the upgrade11:02
jfrancoapanda: anyway, it's a fair point, including the packages update steps inside the upgrade process. I'll discuss it with the DFG11:02
*** arxcruz has joined #oooq11:03
pandajfrancoa: ok, is this safe to merge at this point ?11:03
pandanoop for me, I can +W11:03
jfrancoapanda: but the modification in 630228 is needed so far, otherwise standalone-upgrade is all the time testing what's in master, not the gerrit patch11:03
pandauh ?11:04
chandan_kumararxcruz: please have a look at last comment https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/us/441 we need to finalize the design for this user story11:05
pandajfrancoa: when a job is triggered by a gerrit patch, a new package is built and installed automatically, why you need to update ?11:05
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o arxcruz11:06
arxcruzchandan_kumar: ack11:06
arxcruzchandan_kumar: did you check my last comment?11:07
*** apetrich has joined #oooq11:07
jfrancoapanda: but in our case we are deploying a release less version (so we don't need the patch instealled at that point) and upgrading to the version which includes the patch (and that's the moment when we need the package to be installed)11:07
chandan_kumararxcruz: sorry seen right now thanks!11:08
pandajfrancoa: you and your n-1 installations!! :)11:08
pandajfrancoa: alright11:08
jfrancoapanda: haha how to do an upgrade if not?11:09
*** holser_ is now known as holser|lunch11:09
*** ratailor__ has joined #oooq11:10
pandajfrancoa: +W11:12
*** ratailor_ has quit IRC11:12
jfrancoapanda: thanks sir11:12
quiquellsshnaidm: created a taiga task for the selinux labeling issue https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/taskboard/unified-sprint-4?kanban-status=144727511:15
sshnaidmquiquell, maybe we can run restorecon in containers before command..11:17
quiquellsshnaidm: Humm if something fails and command is not run labels are wrong11:18
quiquellsshnaidm: Better ensure that we do nothing with those directories11:18
pandachandan_kumar: commented https://review.openstack.org/62841511:24
chandan_kumarpanda: sure, will update it :-)11:27
quiquellmarios: Do you know if we can resuse "files:" block with some yaml stuff ?11:34
pandassbarnea|rover: sorry you were so close ttps://review.openstack.org/62763311:35
*** udesale has joined #oooq11:36
ssbarnea|roverpanda: haha, risks of the trade. i will rebase.11:36
ssbarnea|roverpanda: in fact, i think is wrong, the script is running with set -e, so it will stop if rebase fails.11:38
ssbarnea|roverif you look up a little bit, you will find a set -e11:39
pandassbarnea|rover: is there also a set -x ?11:39
ssbarnea|roverpanda: set -x is verbosity, not added by me. arguably if we want it or not but clearly outside the scope of this change.11:40
ssbarnea|roverpanda: unless you know about a place in the source that calls "set +e" the rebase will fail and stop execution.11:40
pandassbarnea|rover: I mean, the rebase fails and the run stops. How do I understand why ?11:40
ssbarnea|roverpanda: imho the git gives a enough information why.11:41
*** apetrich has quit IRC11:44
pandassbarnea|rover: some comments in https://review.openstack.org/628409 too11:47
mariosquiquell: o/ not sure what you mean have smoething to point at/?11:48
mariosjaosorior: o/ hey man can you check this please and do you know someone else with core we can ask to vote? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/628244/ i also pinged openstack-barbican a little while ago11:49
quiquellmarios: https://markusholtermann.eu/2016/04/reference-variables-in-ansible-yaml/11:49
mariosrfolco: (you'll see i just sent another round of harrass-mail :) still telemetry/barbican/heat @ https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:replace-scen2+(status:open+OR+status:merged)11:50
mariosquiquell: didn't read all but maybe set_fact and use that with_items that what you mean?11:51
ssbarnea|roverpanda: can you suggest me a good message for the cleanup part? no need to worry about template, it will override the file (is default behavior)11:51
mariosquiquell: but not something i know off hand though maybe ssbarnea|rover might know11:51
quiquellmarios: we cannot do that with "zuul" file config11:51
mariosquiquell: why/how you mean you cant use set_fact or isn't read properly/as you want?11:52
quiquellmarios: The idea is to find something to reduce duplicity at those "files: " sections11:52
mariosquiquell: OH i see what you mean11:52
quiquellmarios: zuul config is not an ansible task11:52
mariosquiquell: you mean in the layout.yaml11:52
quiquellmarios: yep11:52
quiquellmarios: maybe yaml references can help there11:52
ssbarnea|rovermarios: quiquell: i asked on zuul channel but didn't get a rely yesterday. we should try again.11:53
mariosquiquell: yeah would be nice if we could 'inherit' there somehow :) but for some of them is different11:53
quiquellssbarnea|rover: yaml references can help ?11:53
mariosquiquell: i think for first pass though lets get it merged and we can tidy up as next step? ssbarnea|rover11:53
quiquellmarios: Yep, just commented it but added a +2 is just an idea11:53
mariosquiquell: anyway is still early in sprint11:53
mariosquiquell: ack11:53
ssbarnea|roverquiquell: marios: yaml references may work but we need to test, depends on the parser and how is used. as a rule when they work, they work only inside the same file.11:54
mariosssbarnea|rover: thanks11:54
quiquellssbarnea|rover: Do you know if you can like concantenate partial list with them ?=11:55
quiquellssbarnea|rover: or is all or nothing ?11:55
ssbarnea|roveri used that a lot with jenkins-job definitions, pretty ugly. nope I do not know.11:55
mariosssbarnea|rover: yeah thats a good idea (yaml refs) we use those in the upgrade/update_tasks in fact in tht already for prevention of duplicate blocks11:55
quiquellssbarnea|rover: would be nice to have a zuul mechanism11:55
mariosssbarnea|rover: but unkown how zuul will deal with them right11:55
ssbarnea|roversee what parser is used by zuul and make a local test with it. we may get lucky.11:56
ssbarnea|roveri would not even look at zuul itself, probably is inside pyyaml11:56
pandassbarnea|rover: the message can stay, I think we have to revisit that option11:56
*** holser|lunch is now known as holser_11:57
ssbarnea|roveri am more curious if we can merge dictionaries, like: gate to include all that check contains and something more.11:57
pandassbarnea|rover: and anyway -x and -e in bash for me are lazy writing :)11:57
mariosreview request please folks adding the periodic standalone-scenarios 1-4 so they start running. we can defer the addition into the master promote criteria till later but would be nice to have them running please thanks https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/q/topic:standalone-scenario-promotion11:58
pandassbarnea|rover: oh, you are changing the default in 62763312:01
rfolcomarios, quick question: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/18094/2/ci-scripts/dlrnapi_promoter/config/master.ini - is it agreed to add to promotion criteria now ? I thought we should add jobs to pipeline but not prevent promotion if fails.12:01
*** apetrich has joined #oooq12:01
mariosrfolco: ack yeah i just -1 both of those and added a comment to that effect12:01
pandassbarnea|rover: mmhh no you're not12:01
mariosrfolco: i.e. lets land the rdo-jobs ones but not the ci-config ones12:01
mariosrfolco: thanks12:01
pandaI hate perlisms.12:02
rfolcomarios, ok thank you for confirming :)12:02
rfolcodid i hear PERL ?12:02
pandarfolco: no, PERLisms12:02
pandarfolco: like do_something || die12:02
*** jpena is now known as jpena|lunch12:03
rfolcopanda, perl_you_like || don't12:03
ssbarnea|roverpanda: i agree with you that is confusing, i made the condition wrong initially. Well, i do have ~4years of perl but these were not my best ones. I will try to use if/then/fi in the future.12:03
pandassbarnea|rover: +W that one, for the other, not sure how to proceed12:05
pandassbarnea|rover: the option doesn't do much, unless you skip tripleo-inventory, and I'm not sure where we are doing that anymore12:06
quiquellpanda: commented https://review.openstack.org/#/c/61761712:11
quiquellssbarnea|rover: libvirt update images takes sooo long, maybe we can update it's image too if we put in place the images mechanism12:12
quiquellI mean sshnaidm sorry12:13
sshnaidmquiquell, which update? in nodepool-setup?12:13
quiquellsshnaidm: Yep I am reaching it at CI and takes sooo long12:13
sshnaidmquiquell, which image do you use?12:14
quiquellsshnaidm: Default one at libvirt... humm maybe I can take the last one from cloud ?12:14
sshnaidmquiquell, yeah, maybe it's old one12:14
sshnaidmquiquell, what is the default now there?12:14
quiquellsshnaidm: libvirt step passed at CI !!!! :-)12:15
quiquellhttps://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/stream/d1e9ccae73f24164b80a3a9c847cc040?logfile=console.log12:15
pandassbarnea|rover: also for https://review.openstack.org/62014612:15
quiquellsshnaidm: https://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/images/CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-1802.qcow212:15
sshnaidmquiquell, \o/12:15
pandasshnaidm: I'm always terrified by the the lack of documentation on static includes.12:15
pandasshnaidm: sorry for ssbarnea|rover12:16
quiquellpanda: hahah that sound so bad :-)12:16
sshnaidmquiquell, let's use https://cloud.centos.org/centos/7/images/CentOS-7-x86_64-GenericCloud-1809.qcow2 then12:16
pandassbarnea|rover: in the past when you wanted something to include dynamically you had to specify static: no. So I'm assuming all those roles: role inclusions are static12:17
quiquellsshnaidm: Will try to introspect and take the latest12:17
pandassbarnea|rover: on the other hand, include_role is dynamic by default, so we are effectively changing ALL the inclusion types in ALL our includes12:17
pandassbarnea|rover: I'll commmend on the change12:17
pandawhat sounds bad12:20
panda?12:20
pandaquiquell: https://review.openstack.org/629872  please, a +145, -258 change deserves some brief explanation, otherwise I'll stay here and tempest you with questions, then ask all the other cores to do the same :)12:23
quiquellpanda: Agree didn't want to throw it at people until libvirt job passes12:24
quiquellpanda: let me link third party to this12:24
quiquellpanda: now that it passes so we can review the changes in the review itself and will add comments12:24
mariossshnaidm: o/ hey can you please revote https://review.openstack.org/#/c/630239/12:25
pandaquiquell: replied https://review.openstack.org/61761712:25
pandaquiquell: ok, thanks.12:25
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario003-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container- (2 more messages)12:25
mariossshnaidm: we don't want it in gate as it isn't voting (alex replied thanks for reviewing)12:25
chandan_kumarquiquell: ostempest in action http://logs.openstack.org/00/627500/43/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-os-tempest/04c119d/job-output.txt.gz#_2019-01-15_10_48_39_79417912:26
quiquellpanda: commented12:28
quiquellchandan_kumar: \o/ !!12:28
mariossshnaidm: thanks12:29
quiquellsshnaidm: success libvirt ! :-) 30 minutes :-(12:29
sshnaidmquiquell, great!12:30
sshnaidmquiquell, maybe with newer image will take less time12:30
quiquellpanda, sshnaidm: How do I hock third party CI to a upstream repo ?12:30
quiquellwant to run the reproducer CI at tq/tqe changes for libvirt/nodepool12:30
pandaquiquell: hock ?12:31
quiquellpanda: Run RDO jobs at upstream change12:31
quiquellpanda: Third Party CI12:31
pandaquiquell: you'll need to change the trigger in config12:32
quiquellpanda: Argg config project :-(12:32
pandaquiquell: it's time you face the dismay and terror we face every day12:32
quiquellpanda: thanks will look12:32
pandaquiquell: the blindness that takes you while changing those repositories12:33
pandaquiquell: what's the job that needs to trigger ?12:33
quiquellpanda: <advertisment> with the zuul repro you can play with trusted projects before put in place a review </advertisment>12:33
pandaquiquell: maybe it's not in config, but in rdo-job12:33
pandaquiquell: I'll be happy when I see it. It was in the "future plans" wasn't it ?12:34
pandaquiquell: if the job is in rdo-job you just need to change the pipeline12:34
quiquellpanda: differnt project12:35
pandaquiquell: to openstack-check-rdo12:35
pandaquiquell: subject ?12:35
quiquellpanda: let me do some investigations12:37
pandaquiquell: don't forget the raincoat and the black fedora.12:38
quiquellpanda: dthanks12:38
pandaquiquell: 617617 updated thanks12:39
quiquellnp12:40
*** ratailor__ has quit IRC12:40
pandachandan_kumar: question about tempest in standalone12:41
chandan_kumarpanda: yes12:41
sshnaidmquiquell, finally succeeded with nodepool and zuul user..12:41
pandachandan_kumar: ok, thanks.12:41
sshnaidmquiquell, good day for reproducer :D12:41
quiquellsshnaidm: with the userdata ?12:42
sshnaidmquiquell, yeah12:42
quiquellsshnaidm: so we can use key-name there ?12:42
chandan_kumarpanda: I will be updating the patch soon, currnetly updating tempestconf one12:42
sshnaidmquiquell,  no need, we can put ssh-key in userdata itself12:42
sshnaidmquiquell, just need to merge this patch to nodepool12:43
quiquellsshnaidm: it means pre cooking the images ?12:43
quiquellsshnaidm: pass me the review12:43
*** zul has joined #oooq12:43
sshnaidmquiquell, yeah, it requires a cloud-init installed12:43
pandachandan_kumar: no, so my question was12:43
quiquellLet's use marios technics on harrasing reviews12:43
pandachandan_kumar: what are we testing with tempest in standalone ?12:43
sshnaidmquiquell, well, I need to prepare tests for it before12:43
quiquellsshnaidm: so the placen with that is install there our tripleo ci pub keys for zuul user but with upstream image is that it ?12:44
pandachandan_kumar: how do you understand what's installed and what to test ? undercloud has a defined set of services installed, standalone is a free for all entropic simulation12:44
chandan_kumarpanda: that thing, we need to figure out12:45
sshnaidmquiquell, the possible workflow is - download image, install cloud-init, upload images, share image, then you just put userdata in nodepool config on client side12:45
chandan_kumarpanda: on osa side, they use group_var12:45
quiquellsshnaidm: ahh shit understood, that super cool12:45
sshnaidmquiquell, ssh-key is taken like lookup('file', 'id_rsa.pub') and added to nodepool config12:46
quiquellsshnaidm: how big where those images ?12:46
quiquellsshnaidm: libvirt one is 800 gb12:46
sshnaidmquiquell, 6GB12:46
pandachandan_kumar: ok12:46
sshnaidmquiquell, they're pretty big..12:46
quiquellI mean 800mb12:47
*** panda is now known as panda|lunch12:47
sshnaidmquiquell, yeah, I understood :D12:47
quiquellsshnaidm: Maybe we can give the option at libvirt of setip things up or just download it12:47
sshnaidmquiquell, will look into image-manager, maybe will be easier to use it..12:48
quiquellsshnaidm: because seting thins up takes a lot of time too12:48
quiquellsshnaidm: ack, not bad to have a generator for images12:48
quiquellsshnaidm: even out of reproducer12:48
chandan_kumarpanda: if we are talking about this one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/628415/19/playbooks/multinode-standalone.yml@61 we might use OS::TripleO::Services::CinderApi for setting the tempest_service_available vars or we need to find something other thing12:48
chandan_kumarpanda|lunch: I am thinking of first goal is to run os_tempest in ci12:48
sshnaidmquiquell, I think.. if we'll use nodepool-setup with libvirt, why not to use it with cloud images too12:48
chandan_kumarpanda|lunch: next step is to go with cleanup12:48
quiquellsshnaidm: yep12:49
quiquellsshnaidm: well let's go step by step12:49
sshnaidmquiquell, or maybe to make it optional.. by default - cloud image with our modifications, and by request - nodepool image12:49
sshnaidmquiquell, yeah, need to check other options now12:50
quiquellsshnaidm: "nodepool iamge" == role setup images ?12:50
sshnaidmquiquell, what is "role setup images"?12:50
quiquellsshnaidm: vanilla centos + libvirt role + nodepool setup role12:50
sshnaidmquiquell, well, we mimic nodepool image, but it's still not equivalent12:51
quiquellsshnaidm: Also libvirt + fedora28 will neeed a lot of adaptations...12:51
sshnaidmquiquell, for python3?12:52
quiquellsshnaidm: python3 + os things12:52
quiquellsshnaidm: You don't know until you don't run :-/12:52
quiquells/don't//12:52
sshnaidmquiquell, maybe we can postpone it, not in mvp12:53
quiquellsshnaidm: sure is not in mvp it will take time to adapt libvirt to fedora2812:53
*** chandan_kumar has quit IRC12:58
*** chandan_kumar has joined #oooq12:59
*** jpena|lunch is now known as jpena12:59
chandan_kumarweshay: Hello13:01
chandan_kumarweshay: add new role to tq meeting13:01
weshaychandan_kumar, hey.. joining.. had to make some coffee13:01
chandan_kumarweshay: sure13:01
weshaychandan_kumar, https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/blob/master/quickstart-extras-requirements.txt13:04
quiquellweshay: libvirt CI pass :-)13:07
weshaywoot13:07
weshayrrcockpit :)13:07
weshaylove it13:07
quiquellpanda|lunch: added comments to the libvirt patches they are ready for review now13:08
weshaychandan_kumar, https://docs.openstack.org/tripleo-quickstart/latest/working-with-extras.html13:13
weshayhttps://docs.openstack.org/tripleo-quickstart/latest/working-with-extras.html#developing-new-roles13:14
chandan_kumarweshay: https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/tripleo-specs/specs/stein/ostempest-tripleo.html13:15
arxcruzweshay: why sometimes the jobs on periodic are skipped?13:18
arxcruzme and ssbarnea|rover was wondering that last week13:18
*** rlandy has joined #oooq13:19
chandan_kumarweshay: https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/us/441?milestone=21519113:21
*** arxcruz is now known as arxcruz|ruck13:21
*** trown|outtypewww is now known as trown13:29
*** udesale has quit IRC13:36
*** udesale has joined #oooq13:36
weshaymarios, good morning sir13:40
weshaylet me know if you have any interest in chatting about the upgrade job and those few reviews13:41
weshaypanda|lunch, we should chat too when ur back13:41
mariosweshay: ack sure, wana do it now?13:41
weshaynow is fine by me13:41
weshayif I'm awak enough.. my blue13:41
mariosweshay: or we can talk on community call too? whatever13:42
* marios unpackign headphones13:42
weshaymarios, ya.. better idea13:42
weshayur right13:42
weshaysee you then13:42
weshayTONIGHT WE DINE IN HELL13:42
mariosweshay: ack wfm (want to revisit that bug anyway since bandini updated earlier but didnt context switch yet)13:42
*** panda|lunch is now known as panda13:43
pandaweshay: marios community meeting conflicts with UA meeting for me.13:44
weshaypanda, that's fine.. we need to chat about containers13:44
* weshay hangs out in my blue13:45
weshayso ronrie13:45
weshayso sad and roooonrie13:45
weshaymarios, ah.. so the multinode and standalone are probably hitting the same issue13:46
mariosweshay: i saw your note about the multinode fail but didn't dig there . we are still missing something ... there must be some default switched on the 8th cos that job was green for a while13:47
mariosweshay: i mean, if it isn't the rabbit thing (even after bandini fix hits the same  again)(13:48
weshaypanda, https://trunk.rdoproject.org/fedora/current-tripleo/13:49
weshaymarios, I guess we could diff against scen0213:53
weshaythe only diff should be...13:53
weshaysahara13:53
weshaymistral13:53
weshayand designate13:54
weshayor 413:54
ssbarnea|roverarxcruz|ruck: i think skip is done when there is a job already running (last one didn't finish), right weshay?14:02
arxcruz|ruckssbarnea|rover: some periodic jobs today were skipped14:03
*** apetrich has quit IRC14:07
lyarwoodpanda: sorry, didn't want to spam in the channel during the meeting14:11
lyarwoodpanda: so I've spent my morning trying to work the container build flow into an existing reproduer I had to hand without any luck14:11
lyarwoodpanda: there's a build job on tripleo-common that is successfully building the image but it doesn't have an associated reproducer script14:12
ssbarnea|roverarxcruz|ruck: I do not see skipped for today on https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?pipeline=openstack-periodic14:12
*** apetrich has joined #oooq14:12
arxcruz|ruckssbarnea|rover: https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/status check the periodic running14:14
arxcruz|rucka bunch of jobs marked as skipped14:14
arxcruz|ruckssbarnea|rover: plus on the link you point, it's not sort by date14:14
pandalyarwood: mmhhh, if you can't build the image, I can't imagine how long it will take me :)14:15
ssbarnea|roverarxcruz|ruck: oops, i was sure it was sorted by date.14:15
pandalyarwood: I'll start the build, reproducing the promotion job, I'll ping you if I encounter problems.14:16
ssbarnea|roverarxcruz|ruck: me clueless, and the table is not helping at all, all links on the skipped lines are broken and there is no time recorded. so clearly not helping much.14:17
arxcruz|ruckssbarnea|rover: that's why i would like to know what's happening why/how14:18
ssbarnea|roverarxcruz|ruck: lets ask in #rdo channel14:18
ssbarnea|roverunrelated: just discovered that ansible-galaxy is being replace with mazer : https://github.com/ansible/galaxy/issues/1455#issuecomment-454401566 -- made a note to play with it over the weekend.14:20
pandaweshay: reported results for fedora mixed job to fedora and centos, but the promoter script is not resilient enough to promote a fedora hash without having any image available. It will just fail saying " ther is no overcloud image for this hashm and WHERE ARE MY CONTAINERS???" then explode. So manual promotion it is.14:22
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario003-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container- (2 more messages)14:25
weshaybrb.. folks my son's bday14:30
*** vinaykns has joined #oooq14:33
ykarelHappy b'day to junior weshay14:35
rfolcoCI community meeting (office hours) starts now at https://bluejeans.com/411356779814:40
weshayhttp://logs.openstack.org/63/630363/4/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades/2495ab4/job-output.txt.gz15:02
*** ykarel has quit IRC15:04
*** quiquell is now known as quiquell|off15:07
weshayarxcruz|ruck, hey you around15:15
arxcruz|ruckweshay: i'm always around15:15
arxcruz|ruck:)15:15
weshayarxcruz|ruck, join the https://bluejeans.com/411356779815:16
*** ykarel has joined #oooq15:23
pandaweshay: https://trunk.rdoproject.org/fedora28-master/?C=M;O=D  current-tripleo/ 2019-01-14 09:1316:13
*** dougbtv has joined #oooq16:15
*** ccamacho has quit IRC16:16
weshaypanda, thank you sir16:17
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away16:23
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario003-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container- (2 more messages)16:26
weshayykarel|away, we should chat16:26
pandaarxcruz|ruck: ssbarnea|rover heads up I uploaded a new container which didn't pass through promotion https://hub.docker.com/r/tripleomaster/centos-binary-placement-api/tags16:34
pandaarxcruz|ruck: ssbarnea|rover but I had to tag it with current-tripleo and the latest hash, otherwise it would not work16:34
pandaarxcruz|ruck: ssbarnea|rover if it causes any problem, ping me16:35
pandaarxcruz|ruck: ssbarnea|rover or lyarwood16:35
arxcruz|ruckpanda: ack16:35
lyarwoodyup, I'll be AFK for a few hours but back again this evening if there are any issues with this being there16:39
ykarel|awayweshay, can we do tomorrow? it's late here16:41
weshayykarel|away, oh ya.. no rush man :)16:43
weshaysorry to ping you16:43
ykarel|awaynp :)16:43
*** hamzy_ has quit IRC16:43
*** udesale has quit IRC17:04
rlandypanda: re: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/622575/7/roles/run-test/tasks/main.yaml17:07
rlandyis there any other way to pass vars to the inner playbooks other than what I have commented on?17:08
rlandyam I missing something here?17:08
rlandyreproducer case only17:08
*** derekh has quit IRC17:22
weshaykopecmartin++17:26
hubbot1weshay: kopecmartin's karma is now 517:26
weshaythanks for chasing the doc issues17:26
*** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk17:28
pandarlandy: the quickest way would be to rename featureset_override to just "overrides" in all our jobs.17:33
rlandypanda: I have defined it in allowed_overrides17:33
rlandywill raise this in our next meeting17:33
pandarlandy: the less intrusive way would be to add a generic extra_vars variable that will be handled like the featureset_override17:34
pandarlandy: yes, but that variable needs to be set in the featureset_override dict in the job variable17:34
pandaand we need to put the dlrn_hash_tag, featureset override doesn't make sense anymore, beause we are not overriding featureset anymore17:35
rlandypanda: what worries me about extra_vars is that it's already over used17:35
rlandylook at how it is defined17:35
rlandyin diff cases17:35
*** dtantsur|afk has quit IRC17:36
*** ykarel has joined #oooq17:37
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC17:38
pandarlandy: if you're passing it as vars: to the zuul job directly, it will end up in @{{ workspace }}/logs/zuul-variables.yaml17:38
rlandythat won;t help17:38
pandarlandy: which is already the highest extra vars in the inner ansible17:38
rlandyso then we could just pass the vars directly?17:39
* rlandy is never sure about this17:39
pandarlandy: yes everything that you pass in zuul as vars for the job is dumped in @{{ workspace }}/logs/zuul-variables.yaml  and passed to the inner ansible-playbook as last configuration, that is it will override everything17:40
rlandyok - then we can pass directly17:40
pandarlandy: the problems is that everything will need to be addressed as zuul.dlrn_hash17:40
pandazuul.dlrn_hash*17:41
rlandyhmmm17:41
rlandythat won;t work17:41
pandawhich again is on a different namespace ...17:41
rlandythe override is better17:41
pandaI need a redesign on the featureset at this point ... I'm not sure where we're heading. The override list is growing, we are going to add override for variables that are not in the featuresets, and we may end up having too many places where we can specify a variable and not being sure which one wins in the end17:44
*** sanjayu_ has quit IRC17:50
*** trown is now known as trown|lunch17:52
*** jpena is now known as jpena|off17:59
rlandypanda: understood - for the moment I am designing the reproducer with what is available  - allowed_overrides18:00
weshaypanda, rlandy what var are you guuys talking about?18:02
weshaythat needs to be overridden in ALL jobs18:02
pandaweshay: not all jobs18:03
pandaweshay: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/622575/7/roles/run-test/tasks/main.yaml@1918:03
pandathe problem is how to inject a variable from zuul configuration to inner ansible call in a way taht can be used by quickstart roles18:04
weshayoh.. this is cool18:04
pandaa bit less cool if you picture how this variable is going to be passed18:07
rlandyweshay: quiquell|off and I today went through the design of the reproducer scipt18:07
*** holser_ is now known as holser|eod18:08
rlandyscript18:08
rlandywhat gets created etc.18:08
weshaycool18:08
rlandyI am working on the review now18:08
rlandywhat goes into playbooks vs. bash etc18:08
weshayso the script that folks download w/ a dlrn hash will be setting the override var18:08
rlandyfor the reproducer we need to pass a couple things18:08
weshayfor dlrn18:08
weshayya18:08
weshaythis is nice18:08
weshay+218:08
rlandygetting there :)18:08
* rlandy is still explaining18:09
rlandydlrn hash OR releases file18:09
rlandydepending on fs18:09
weshayk18:09
rlandyand depends-on for the job itself18:09
weshaysomeone remind me.. check-rdo to recheck 3rd party?18:09
weshaywhat's the keyword18:09
* rlandy thinks so - checking18:10
pandacheck-rdo18:10
pandaweshay: ^18:10
weshaythanks18:10
weshaylol18:10
pandaor verify-rdo18:10
rlandyweshay: https://github.com/rdo-infra/review.rdoproject.org-config/blob/2dcdfd80d0a30e8c11142dfeb858982cd8ea8b46/zuul.d/upstream.yaml#L2118:10
rlandyrecheck|check-rdo|verify-rdo18:10
pandaor recheck if you don't mind checking everything else too18:10
weshayya18:11
weshayfor some reason rdo is not trigging on everything in the last 24hrs18:11
weshayI think things may be reset w/o us knowing18:11
weshayso it goes18:12
*** holser|eod has quit IRC18:12
*** brault has quit IRC18:14
*** brault has joined #oooq18:15
pandaand I thought the day was going well.18:19
*** panda is now known as panda|off18:19
*** brault has quit IRC18:20
*** ykarel has quit IRC18:25
*** bogdando has quit IRC18:26
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario003-standalone, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset053 @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo- (2 more messages)18:26
*** chem has quit IRC18:43
*** hamzy_ has joined #oooq18:44
weshayrlandy, when you have a sec.. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/628024/ sshnaidm18:51
*** kopecmartin is now known as kopecmartin|off18:52
*** hamzy_ has quit IRC18:59
*** hamzy_ has joined #oooq19:00
*** hamzy_ has quit IRC19:13
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|brb19:14
*** trown|lunch is now known as trown19:19
*** hamzy_ has joined #oooq19:31
*** jfrancoa has quit IRC19:31
*** rlandy|brb is now known as rlandy19:33
*** dougbtv has quit IRC19:44
*** brault has joined #oooq20:06
*** brault has quit IRC20:11
*** hamzy_ has quit IRC20:12
ssbarnea|roverweshay: can you run this for me and tell if it worked? https://gist.github.com/ssbarnea/c6100ec231055a5c861acbfebe08910820:23
weshayk20:25
* weshay tries20:25
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario003-standalone, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset053 @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo- (2 more messages)20:26
weshayssbarnea|rover, fatal: [localhost]: FAILED! => {"changed": false, "msg": "Error creating container: 400 Client Error: Bad Request (\"{\"message\":\"No command specified\"}\")"}20:28
*** rfolco has quit IRC20:28
ssbarnea|roverweshay: and if you replace fedora:28 with centos:7 ? ... it works, right?20:28
weshaywill do so now20:28
weshayssbarnea|rover, yup20:29
weshaycentos-7 works20:29
weshayI wonder if there is another name20:29
weshayhttps://developer.fedoraproject.org/tools/docker/docker-usage.html20:30
ssbarnea|roverweshay: what can I say. Now try to add "command: ls"20:30
ssbarnea|roverand the fedora:28 will work.20:30
ssbarnea|roverit happens only with fedora* when command is null (default)20:30
ssbarnea|rovernot sure who to blame for this.... unexpected surprise20:31
weshayodd20:32
weshayfedora should equal fedora:latest20:32
weshayprobably docker is a like f u red hat20:32
weshayw/ your kubernettes and podman20:33
ssbarnea|roverweshay: is more of a [f]edora you, because centos works :D20:33
weshayheh20:33
weshayrlandy, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/622575/ looks good re: 3rd party20:34
ssbarnea|rovermolecule uses this module, now we need to narrow down who is the culprit: ansible module, python docker, docker itself or the fedora image having somethign weird in it.20:34
weshayoh ya20:34
weshayssbarnea|rover, so why not use the centos7-base and fedora-base image we create20:35
weshayin docker.io20:35
* weshay wonders if thhose are busted20:35
rlandyweshay: thanks - still part of the whole reproducer design we will be bringing to Thurs meeting20:35
ssbarnea|roverweshay: I doubt. it has somethign to do with command. if you override command it works.20:36
weshayrock20:36
ssbarnea|roveri coult put "command: echo" and avoid the bug20:36
weshaymeh.. weird20:37
ssbarnea|roverended up creating https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/5095120:44
weshayarxcruz|ruck, tomorrow.. saw this fail in tempest https://ci.centos.org/view/rdo/view/promotion-pipeline/job/rdo_trunk-promote-master-current-tripleo/428/21:05
* weshay wonders if there is a no-op tempest test.. you need one pass to generate results21:06
weshayoh there was a pass.21:07
weshayarxcruz|ruck, def. look into this tomorrow https://ci.centos.org/artifacts/rdo/jenkins-tripleo-quickstart-promote-master-current-tripleo-delorean-minimal-446/undercloud/home/stack/tempest.log.gz21:07
ssbarnea|roverweshay: got progress, proved to be broken fedora image, bug raised at https://github.com/fedora-cloud/docker-brew-fedora/issues/62 -- wondering when/if it will be fixed.21:08
arxcruz|ruckweshay: i'm on pto tomorrow...21:09
weshaybah k21:09
weshayssbarnea|rover, heh.. no need to test or ci that stuff.. geez21:10
weshayarxcruz|ruck, I'll take care of it, have a good night21:10
weshayrlandy, can I close https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/181026921:11
openstackLaunchpad bug 1810269 in tripleo "tempest.api.compute.admin.test_agents.AgentsAdminTestJSON tests failing with Internal Server Error" [Critical,Triaged] - Assigned to Ronelle Landy (rlandy)21:11
rlandyweshay: has phase 1 run yet?21:12
rlandyor do you see tempest running on fs02021:12
rlandyif som yes21:12
weshayI just rekicked it.. but not w/ new tripleo21:12
rlandyso21:12
rlandyif we haven't see tempest run, we don;t know it's fixed21:12
weshayah. .we need a new nova21:13
weshayrfc3986-1.2.0 is available in Repo[1], now needs promotion of nova containers(to current-tripleo) to get RDO phase1 clear.21:13
rlandyweshay: very preliminary - but you can see the design starting here ... https://review.openstack.org/#/c/631067/21:19
* rlandy has lots to fill in21:19
weshayk21:20
*** hamzy_ has joined #oooq21:21
*** hamzy_ has quit IRC21:29
weshayholy cow we had a ton of old prmotion blockers21:30
*** trown is now known as trown|outtypewww21:41
Tenguraaaaahhhhh22:24
Tengupodman ;_;. such a nasty boy22:24
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario003-standalone, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset053 @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades,  (2 more messages)22:26
*** brault has joined #oooq22:45
*** brault has quit IRC22:45
*** vinaykns has quit IRC22:50
*** jtomasek has quit IRC23:01
*** rascasoft has quit IRC23:06
*** rlandy has quit IRC23:33
*** rascasoft has joined #oooq23:34
*** rascasoft has quit IRC23:39

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!