Friday, 2019-01-04

« Thursday, 2019-01-03 Index Saturday, 2019-01-05 »
*** sshnaidm_ has joined #oooq00:12
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-containerized-undercloud-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.org/56429100:15
*** sshnaidm__ has quit IRC00:15
*** matbu has quit IRC00:46
*** rlandy|rover has quit IRC01:06
*** tosky has quit IRC01:17
*** sshnaidm_ has quit IRC02:02
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-containerized-undercloud-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.org/56429102:15
*** sshnaidm_ has joined #oooq02:19
*** apetrich has quit IRC03:15
*** skramaja has joined #oooq03:24
*** ykarel|away has joined #oooq03:37
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-containerized-undercloud-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade, tripleo-ci-centos-7-containerized-undercloud-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.o04:15
*** udesale has joined #oooq04:52
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC05:26
*** ykarel|away has joined #oooq05:43
*** ykarel|away is now known as ykarel05:44
*** dtrainor has quit IRC05:54
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-containerized-undercloud-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade, tripleo-ci-centos-7-containerized-undercloud-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.o06:15
*** dtrainor has joined #oooq06:21
*** agopi has quit IRC06:34
*** saneax has joined #oooq06:53
*** quiquell|off has quit IRC07:13
*** quiquell has joined #oooq07:14
*** jfrancoa has joined #oooq07:16
*** matbu has joined #oooq07:18
*** bogdando has joined #oooq07:24
*** holser_ has joined #oooq07:31
*** apetrich has joined #oooq07:32
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq08:01
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|lunch08:02
*** rascasoft has joined #oooq08:07
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-containerized-undercloud-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade, tripleo-ci-centos-7-containerized-undercloud-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.o08:15
pandaykarel|lunch: can you take another look at this ? https://review.rdoproject.org/api/1774408:27
*** kopecmartin|off is now known as kopecmartin08:28
quiquellpanda: o/08:35
quiquellpanda: I have a question at rfolco review, isn't this https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17807/08:36
quiquellfor fs052 not fs002 ?08:36
quiquellmaybe I am missing someting08:36
pandaquiquell: this is for the pure fedora 28 pipeline08:37
pandaquiquell: so it needs ovb jobs08:37
pandafs52 is standalone08:37
quiquellpanda: ack08:37
*** jaosorior has joined #oooq08:39
pandaquiquell: also, you may want to change your -2 to -1. -2 is when you don't want a patch to merge without your consent , a -2 will stick from patch set to patch set, and usually means "I have big concerns with the patch that you all need to discuss with me"08:39
quiquellpanda: well, the if statement was going to break in case of inexistent variable08:39
quiquellpanda: but yes -1 maybe is good enough for that08:40
quiquellpanda: I am learning how to use those08:40
*** agopi has joined #oooq08:47
*** tosky has joined #oooq08:47
*** udesale has quit IRC08:52
*** udesale has joined #oooq08:54
ssbarneamarios or sshnaidm_  please re-wf https://review.openstack.org/#/c/607288/2509:02
mariosssbarnea: looking09:03
mariosssbarnea: why was there a v 25?09:03
mariosa rebase for -vvvv09:03
marioswhich was alex patch i think09:03
mariosk09:03
*** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel09:12
ykarelpanda, sure looking09:12
ssbarneamarios: i suspect a rebase, the only reason why it could failed to merge, the n-th time.09:15
ssbarneathat change touches files that are often updated so i may take few tries to make it happen.  i really liked panda move to roles.09:17
*** agopi has quit IRC09:17
*** agopi has joined #oooq09:23
*** derekh has joined #oooq09:35
*** udesale has quit IRC09:39
*** udesale has joined #oooq09:40
*** agopi has quit IRC09:47
*** agopi has joined #oooq09:50
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-containerized-undercloud-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade, tripleo-ci-centos-7-containerized-undercloud-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.o10:15
ssbarneamarios: is see no f28 job on puppet-openstack-integration - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/628395/ -- shouldn't we have one there?10:45
pandaykarel: thanks, new PS just in. Is that the ony thing thta remains to iron out ?10:45
ykarelpanda, for me that was last :)10:46
pandaykarel: I hat not being able to test it before merging ...I really don't know if there' something in the workflow not going to work10:46
ykarelhmm it's in config repo, so difficult to test10:47
ykarelpanda, still wrong ur PS10:47
ykarelsingle quote vs double quote10:47
pandaMMMHHH10:49
ykarelmy only concern is about the promotion part, consistent to tripleo-ci-testing10:50
ykarelas fedora and centos can differ10:50
ykarelbut let's see how it goes10:51
pandaykarel: the rationale is that we are still currently using a fedora hash taht is months old, and things didn't blow up10:51
pandaykarel: so small differences are acceptable10:51
pandaykarel: and this is temporary until we get fedora containres10:51
ykarelhmm but u are exiting if hash is not found10:52
ykareli meant belwo10:52
ykarelif [[ "$?" == "1" ]]; then10:52
ykarel            echo "$COMMIT_HASH and $DISTRO_HASH hashes on centos does not have an equivalent in fedora. Skipping this run"10:52
ykarel            exit 110:52
ykarel          fi10:52
pandayes10:52
pandathis was deemed acceptable,  the alternative was to sync the hashes in a more complicated way10:52
ykarelyup agree10:53
ykarellet's see how it goes10:53
pandaykarel: these were the other approaches docs.google.com/drawings/d/1exqEXawY8t4E3-2Q52ckfQ8dSTgr2ayiMgo-6c-4E2g/edit?usp=sharing10:53
pandaykarel: after soem discussion we are in the first approaches10:54
pandaykarel: fixed pipeline10:54
ykarelokk10:56
ykarelhoping to get clean pipeline soon10:56
pandaykarel: how else can review this ?10:57
ykarelfedora containers one10:57
ykarelpanda, people are on holidays10:57
pandaykarel: we are going to get the pipeline soon. a WORKING pipeline is a different story :)10:57
pandaykarel: yep, I know10:57
ykarel:)10:57
ykarelpeople from RDO side will be back by next week10:58
*** sshnaidm__ has joined #oooq11:01
chandankumararxcruz: can you take care of this card https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/issue/510?kanban-status=2048307 , I donot have rhel box or beaker access.11:04
*** sshnaidm_ has quit IRC11:05
*** sshnaidm__ has quit IRC11:06
*** sshnaidm has joined #oooq11:08
*** sshnaidm is now known as sshnaidm|off11:08
*** panda is now known as panda|reloc11:16
ssbarneawould any of you find useful if git-review would be able to auto-switch to a sibling project that matches your "git review -d number" --- it happens oftem for me to call it from wrong folder.11:16
ssbarneai am asking as i don't want to spend time implementing it if others do not find it of use11:17
panda|relocssbarnea: a bit too much to ask ...11:17
panda|relocbe back in ~1h11:17
*** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur11:32
*** skramaja_ has joined #oooq11:51
*** skramaja has quit IRC11:52
*** skramaja_ has quit IRC12:09
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade, tripleo-ci-centos-7-containerized-undercloud-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstac12:15
bogdandoo/ folks12:17
bogdandowe prolly want this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/600792 merged12:17
*** bogdando_ has joined #oooq12:48
panda|relocrelocation was a bad idea ... network is crap here today :(12:49
*** bogdando has quit IRC12:51
*** bogdando_ is now known as bogdando12:51
*** ssbarnea has quit IRC12:51
rfolcopanda|reloc, please let me know when we can merge f28 pipeline12:59
marioscan anyone point me to where tripleo-ci-base-standalone-periodic is defined please? i see it is set as the parent in rdo-jobs but it isn't in that repo afaics https://github.com/rdo-infra/rdo-jobs/blob/3f97b8be58561bec29b164e39f38c82ff8f2248a/zuul.d/standalone-jobs.yaml#L712:59
panda|relocrfolco: isn't that in config ?12:59
panda|relocmarios: in config12:59
quiquellmarios: This is config repo12:59
marioshttps://github.com/rdo-infra/ci-config/13:00
quiquellmarios: Need to be trusted project I think13:00
mariosthanks panda|reloc quiquell checking13:00
chandankumarmarios: https://codesearch.rdoproject.org/?q=tripleo-ci-base-standalone-periodic&i=nope&files=&repos=13:00
marioschandankumar: ah i didn't know about rdoproject hound!13:00
mariosthanks13:00
marios:D13:00
chandankumarmarios: :-)13:00
*** panda|reloc is now known as panda13:00
pandarfolco: ?13:05
rfolcopanda, ?13:05
panda[12:59:06] panda|reloc, please let me know when we can merge f28 pipeline13:05
panda[12:59:24] rfolco: isn't that in config ?13:05
quiquellrfolco: Have cleandup my -2/-1 things13:06
quiquellNow everything is ok13:06
quiquellSorry about that13:06
*** rlandy has joined #oooq13:06
rfolcopanda, the whole thing https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/q/status:open+branch:master+topic:f28_promotion13:09
quiquellrlandy: what do you think of this ? https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/task/470?kanban-status=144727513:11
rlandyweshay|ruck: hello ... labeling up the new card in cix - owner?13:11
rlandyquiquell: is this a card for the libvirt driver?13:13
rlandynot sure of the context13:13
rlandyfor reproducer only? or all ci?13:13
* rlandy has so many reviews related to old reproducer work ... should abandon them13:14
quiquellrlandy: just automatize your work at startup13:14
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|rover13:14
quiquellrlandy|rover: have put in place a meeting as requested by wes to talk about it though13:14
quiquellrlandy|rover: was also thinking that maybe we can just use diskimage builder with the proper elements to do this things13:15
rlandy|roverquiquell: sure - I'm still a bit short of context here13:15
quiquellinstead of ansible13:15
quiquellrlandy|rover: Let's talk next week I want to try your work first, maybe I will ask on or two or thousand questions13:15
rlandy|roverquiquell: the two reviews you linked were what I needed to hack libvirt  ... the main role though is this ...13:15
rlandy|roverhttps://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/blob/master/playbooks/libvirt-nodepool.yml13:16
rlandy|roverquiquell: we can talk whenever you need - if you want to start13:17
rlandy|roverquiquell: I doc'ed the libvirt workflow in the google doc13:17
rlandy|roverbut whatever you can do to simplify - great13:17
quiquellYep followed it, have already run both playbooks and start things up13:17
rlandy|rovercool13:17
rlandy|roverok -then sounds good13:18
quiquellGood thing woul dbe to do snapshots so we can easily relaunch jobs and the like13:18
quiquellDon't want to take mor of your rovering time13:19
mariosanother question please. In master promoter config we have "periodic-standalone-featureset052" @ https://github.com/rdo-infra/ci-config/blob/7011d34ad463df2b02a5cd70953d5de5b2ff9a6a/ci-scripts/dlrnapi_promoter/config/master.ini#L32 . My Q is how is that 'resolved' or to what is it resolved? Does that correspond to some job name? Does it point to this? (and if so how?) https://github.com/rdo-infra/rdo-jobs/blob/3f97b8be58561bec29b164e39f38c82ff8f213:20
quiquellmarios: that's the old toci_job_type13:20
quiquellmarios: now what we do is use zuul variables to compose it so we report corectly to DLRN13:21
* quiquell finds the DLRN report part in thejob13:21
pandarfolco: I still don't see where DISTRO_NAME is set in those patches13:21
rfolcopanda, here https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17740/14/playbooks/tripleo-ci-periodic-base-upload/post.yaml13:24
mariosquiquell: so really the question is, once i add a new periodic standalone scenario job, and i want to add it to the master.ini what do i use? I mean what string13:24
mariosquiquell: job name works?13:24
quiquellmarios: nope job name13:24
quiquellmarios: let me find the place so you understand the contenation13:25
quiquellmarios: to syntetize toci_jobtype13:25
mariosquiquell: hm then we might have a problem13:26
mariosquiquell: unless scenario is in the name13:26
*** trown|outtypewww is now known as trown13:26
mariosquiquell: i mean unless scenario is in the toci_job _type13:26
quiquellok found it13:26
marioscos otherwise we'll have ocnfilict for periodic-standalone-featureset05213:26
weshay|ruckrlandy|rover, /me looking at the roster13:26
quiquellmarios: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/gitweb?p=config.git;a=blob;f=playbooks/tripleo-ci-periodic-base/post.yaml;h=5df57f21a180d0d4ebcc9741747f40029572e9fb;hb=HEAD13:27
quiquellmarios: this is the post tha reports to DLRN about success or not13:28
quiquellmarios: TL;DR periodic-{{ environment_type }}-featureset{{ featureset }}13:28
mariosquiquell: ack thanks reading (so we might have the issue indeed?)13:28
mariosperiodic-standalone-featureset05213:28
quiquellwhat issue ?13:29
mariosquiquell: for adding scenario001-standalone periodic jobs and 2/3/413:29
mariosquiquell: with that algorithm they are all the same like periodic-standalone-featureset05213:29
quiquellsince featureset is the same we are screw :-/13:29
quiquellWe have to reflect featurest_override somehow13:29
mariosweshay|ruck: devil & details ^13:29
mariospanda: stop being so smug13:30
weshay|ruckmarios, ahoy13:30
weshay|ruckanything I can help w/?13:30
mariosquiquell: yeah we can either add scenario into the type?13:30
quiquellmarios: we can just ad extra_field and put it in the promoter .ini files13:30
quiquellmarios: with an if statement in case of scenario just append to generated one13:31
quiquellmarios: and change .ini files in the promoter to map to that13:31
weshay|ruckquiquell, marios just call the job standalone-scen001/002/00313:31
mariosweshay|ruck: no just a comment at this point sorry. basically looking at promotion.ini for scenarios and wondering about this string https://github.com/rdo-infra/ci-config/blob/7011d34ad463df2b02a5cd70953d5de5b2ff9a6a/ci-scripts/dlrnapi_promoter/config/master.ini#L32 "periodic-standalone-featureset052" and the Tl:DR is that the algorithm which gives us toci_job_type will come up with the same for all the scnearioxxx standalone since thay are all13:31
weshay|ruckquiquell, the standalone job is already there breaking the consistency13:32
quiquellweshay|ruck: that does not work, we report toci_jobtype to DLRN13:32
weshay|ruckquiquell, come on man..13:32
weshay|ruckquiquell, it's easy13:32
quiquellweshay|ruck: all scenarioo ones have the same toci_jobtype13:32
weshay|ruckjump on my blue13:32
quiquellack13:32
quiquelldamn bj13:33
weshay|ruckmarios, you have a patch?13:34
mariosweshay|ruck: for the promotion stuff not yet working on adding the job now hence the questions/discussion13:35
pandamarios: I think rlandy|rover already posted a patch to change the TOCI_JOBTYPE to the full job name. We are pushing two different names right now during job success reporting13:35
mariospanda: cool using the job name would work great for our purposes and imo is clearer13:36
mariospanda: clearer in the sense that i can look at master.ini and understand which jobs are tested13:36
quiquellmarios: So after talking with wes13:39
quiquellmarios: what we can do there is just check environtment_type and if it's standalone use the job name directly13:39
quiquellmarios: and configure promoter .ini files acording to that13:39
quiquellmarios: we will have distro there and that's good too13:39
quiquell(I think)13:40
quiquellwdyt ?Â13:40
weshay|ruckquiquell, marios https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17783/13:40
mariosquiquell: ack wfm gonna post the job in a sec (we anyway need to post the jobs first then we can work out how to do it &* looks like wes already did ^ )13:41
quiquellweshay|ruck: we are goin  to test ARM or something ?13:41
weshay|ruckI forget the name, but some company just bought us that uses something other than x86_64. I forget all the details though :)13:42
weshay|ruckand yes arm too13:42
mariosquiquell: i mean scenario1 here https://review.rdoproject.org/r/1807913:42
mariosthanks weshay|ruck checking13:42
quiquellweshay|ruck: ack13:43
weshay|ruckpanda, do we need to discuss future naming conventions for rdo jobs? My thought was using fs names lost the war, adopt the upstream naming scheme wholesale13:43
weshay|ruckquiquell, Lian was harmless and we only spoke for about 30 min13:45
quiquellweshay|ruck: context ?13:46
pandax68_64 is armless too.13:46
weshay|ruckquiquell, usc researcher13:46
quiquellpanda: legless ?13:46
pandaweshay|ruck: I don't remember if we reached a conclusion on naming, we didn't want to think too much ahead, the first decision was just to use full names as TOCI_JOBTYPE13:47
weshay|ruckpanda, is there a patch specifically to use full names as toci_jobtype?13:48
*** agopi has quit IRC13:49
quiquellrlandy|rover: I see the libvirt takes like a lot of time to startup jobs at the new repro, that's normal ?13:49
rlandy|roverquiquell: was pretty quick for me - do you have any errors?13:50
weshay|ruckrlandy|rover, nothing is running in the tripleo gate13:50
quiquellrlandy|rover: no errors no, it's like looping cloning stuff and takes a lot of time13:50
weshay|ruckrlandy|rover, was there an issue or we're just fresh out of patches13:50
* rlandy|rover looks13:50
rlandy|roverweshay|ruck: let's test and w+ something13:51
*** agopi has joined #oooq13:51
weshay|ruckrlandy|rover, I have just the thing13:52
weshay|ruckbut let me fix it13:52
pandaweshay|ruck: I thought it was merged before mine but it's here https://review.rdoproject.org/api/1774413:53
weshay|ruckrlandy|rover, let's workflow https://review.openstack.org/#/c/628070/ and then I'll abandon :)13:53
pandaweshay|ruck: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17744/13/playbooks/tripleo-ci-periodic-base/post.yaml@4613:54
rlandy|roverweshay|ruck: +213:54
rlandy|roverand w+13:54
rlandy|roverlet's see if it shows up13:54
rlandy|roverweshay|ruck: ha13:54
rlandy|roverthere is your gate13:55
weshay|ruckexport TOCI_JOBTYPE="{{ zuul.job }}"13:55
weshay|ruckquiquell, ^13:55
weshay|ruckthanks panda13:55
weshay|ruckhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17744/13/playbooks/tripleo-ci-periodic-base/post.yaml13:55
weshay|ruckmarios, ^13:55
rlandy|roverweshay|ruck: you can abandon now13:55
weshay|ruckrlandy|rover, k13:55
weshay|ruckrlandy|rover, can you spend a minute on https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17744/13:55
quiquellweshay|ruck: Yep I know, but I though that was problematic13:56
quiquellweshay|ruck: I suppose we have to add more specific stuff to criteria13:56
mariosweshay|ruck: thanks great if we can just use the job name13:56
weshay|ruckaye..13:56
weshay|ruckjob name it is :)13:57
quiquellmarios: I was proposing the same but ony for standalone jobs checking "environment_type"13:57
rlandy|roverwill do in a sec- rekicking fs020 testing13:57
mariosweshay|ruck: and then panda can be a little less smug about the whole useing the same featureset thing13:57
weshay|ruckquiquell, be back in 3min13:57
quiquellweshay|ruck: also we have to take into acount that now changin job names means changin criteria13:57
quiquellI am ok with job name13:57
quiquellI have to drop early today13:58
rlandy|roverweshay|ruck: btw, fs001 with 1 controller works just fine - not the nodeset13:58
pandamarios: ...13:59
marios:)13:59
* panda pokes marios in the eyes13:59
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away13:59
weshay|ruckquiquell, ok.. going to blue14:00
weshay|ruckquiquell, a hoy?14:02
quiquelldamn I am bnack14:02
quiquellmy laptop has die after trying libvirt standalone with the new repro :-)14:03
weshay|rucklolz14:03
weshay|ruckquiquell, going to need a bigger laptop :)14:03
quiquellweshay|ruck: no please14:03
quiquellweshay|ruck: you were talking about blue ?14:03
weshay|ruckquiquell, bluejeans14:04
weshay|ruck1-114:04
quiquella ok14:04
quiquellyes14:04
pandaquiquell: if you need a bigger laptop may I suggest http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-7eTfUfzFsQk/UMmapU7GEJI/AAAAAAAAAkI/OwU_KsVMMDQ/s1600/375512_436762796379681_620230191_n.jpg ?14:05
mariospanda: does it come with a case?14:06
pandamarios: yes but you need a mortgage to buy it14:06
rlandy|roverpanda: only get it if the huge windows sign comes included14:07
mariosi mean, you'd have to be seriously fit to use that thing. it would be exhausting to type an email imagine all that running around14:08
rlandy|roverquiquell: actually - wrt libvirt, yeah, the cloning and updating take s a bit - it's fine14:11
chandankumararxcruz: Do we collect clouds.yaml in tripleo logs because I am seeing it there http://logs.openstack.org/00/627500/17/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-os-tempest/88b343c/logs/undercloud/etc/14:11
chandankumar?14:12
arxcruzchandankumar: probably not...14:12
chandankumararxcruz: is it a good idea to collect in logs? I am not sure it exposes some vulnerable stuff14:12
arxcruzchandankumar: yup, if we collect stackrc, we can collect clouds.yml i guess14:13
chandankumararxcruz: let me propose a patch then14:13
chandankumararxcruz: or feel free to propose one if free14:14
arxcruzsure, any chance you know where the clouds.yml are located? $home/tempest/cloud.yml ?14:14
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade, tripleo-ci-centos-7-containerized-undercloud-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstac14:15
chandankumararxcruz: /etc/openstack/ or ~/.config/openstack14:16
arxcruzk14:16
chandankumararxcruz: https://docs.openstack.org/os-client-config/latest/user/configuration.html#config-files14:16
chandankumararxcruz: I am not sure tht dumps clouds.yaml file in /home/zuul directory14:17
arxcruzi'll investigate14:17
chandankumararxcruz: https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-heat-templates/blob/beb8ae7dd53c7b36313956c4ea847f487199468e/extraconfig/post_deploy/clouds_yaml.py14:18
chandankumararxcruz: thanks for taking care of that14:19
*** ssbarnea has joined #oooq14:20
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC14:24
*** bogdando has quit IRC14:26
*** quiquell is now known as quiquell|off14:45
*** sshnaidm_ has joined #oooq14:46
*** sshnaidm|off has quit IRC14:47
rfolcomarios, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/604768 minor issue14:49
rfolcomarios, stop using emacs !!! :)14:49
*** sshnaidm_ is now known as sshnaidm|off14:50
mariosrfolco: wasn't me ! (vim)14:51
rfolcomarios, kidding :)14:51
rfolcohow many fingers a person needs to use emacs ?14:52
mariosthanks rfolco14:52
rlandy|roverpanda: rfolco: anything else to review?14:52
chandankumarmarios: arxcruz need help14:53
chandankumarmarios: arxcruz http://logs.openstack.org/00/627500/19/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-os-tempest/09671ff/job-output.txt.gz#_2019-01-04_13_30_21_06453214:53
chandankumarmarios: arxcruz os_tempest role is not picked up https://review.openstack.org/62750014:54
rlandy|roverarxcruz: I need to borrow your tempest brain when marios is done14:54
chandankumarI am not sure what I am doing wrong14:54
arxcruzchandankumar: we have meeting now, i'll take a look later14:54
arxcruzrlandy|rover: sure14:54
mariosrlandy|rover: wasn't me! (what now?)14:54
chandankumararxcruz: sure14:54
rlandy|rovermarios:sorry - didn't mean to pick on you as well14:55
marioschandankumar: added to list to look at next reviews run14:57
rlandy|roverarxcruz: https://thirdparty.logs.rdoproject.org/jenkins-tripleo-quickstart-rhos-13-baremetal-hp_dl360_envE-single_nic_vlans-91/undercloud/home/stack/tempest.log.txt.gz#_2019-01-04_04_21_20 - this is rhos-1314:57
rlandy|roverlikely I am missing a setting - just not sure which/where14:58
arxcruzkopecmartin: ^14:58
arxcruzrlandy|rover: maybe the endpoint change , i'll check14:59
arxcruz9696 is the port for which service?14:59
*** udesale has quit IRC14:59
arxcruzrlandy|rover: any chance you have a env up ?14:59
arxcruzchandankumar: weshay|ruck kopecmartin meeting now ?14:59
weshay|ruckaye15:00
weshay|ruckjoining.. but give me a sec15:00
rlandy|roverarxcruz; checking15:00
rlandy|roverarxcruz: yes - I do15:01
rlandy|roverpvt sending you connection details15:02
*** Goneri has quit IRC15:05
*** rlandy|rover is now known as rlandy|rover|brb15:10
chandankumararxcruz: weshay|ruck https://github.com/redhat-openstack/octario15:10
*** rlandy|rover|brb is now known as rlandy|rover15:22
*** ykarel|away has joined #oooq15:24
*** saneax has quit IRC15:37
*** jfrancoa has quit IRC16:02
rfolcoweshay|ruck, ping 1x116:03
weshay|ruckrfolco, joining16:05
weshay|ruckrfolco, https://bluejeans.com/411356779816:05
*** apetrich has quit IRC16:07
rfolcoweshay|ruck, joining16:08
*** jrist has joined #oooq16:09
*** arxcruz is now known as arxcruz|brb16:11
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade, tripleo-ci-centos-7-containerized-undercloud-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstac16:16
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC16:18
*** ska has joined #oooq16:21
* marios hometime have a good w/e folks16:22
pandamarios: kthkbye16:22
marioso/ panda16:22
*** apetrich has joined #oooq16:28
skaIs there a channel where we can ask about General Tripleo installation and configuration?16:31
skaThe #tripleo looks like a devepement channel.16:31
*** Goneri has joined #oooq16:34
*** apetrich has quit IRC16:35
rlandy|roverska: it is  - but you can ask there17:00
*** jbadiapa has quit IRC17:04
*** derekh has quit IRC17:04
*** derekh has joined #oooq17:04
*** dtrainor has quit IRC17:14
weshay|ruckrlandy|rover, any luck w/ fs020?17:18
*** dtrainor has joined #oooq17:20
skaIs there any way OOO can be installed on Centos?17:21
skaAlso, will it be similar enough to triple0 on Redhat for testing purposes?17:23
weshay|ruckneed help w/ reviews please https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/q/topic:f28_promotion17:23
rlandy|roverweshay|ruck: so I found out it wasn't the node cleaning ... fs001 with same nodeset worked fine - so it's not that17:36
rlandy|roverI have two more options in test now17:36
rlandy|roverthe only other two diff17:36
rlandy|roveridempotent test17:36
rlandy|roverand extra_vars17:36
rlandy|roverweshay|ruck: https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/stream/fe9d0ef88b0f4bacb0b6305d800e3082?logfile=console.log - running with no idempotent testing17:37
rlandy|roverhttps://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/stream/453224e324fc4225ab4d59c7c1a4d431?logfile=console.log without both17:38
rlandy|roverafter that - the two fs should match exactly17:38
* weshay|ruck looks17:39
rlandy|roverrfolco: panda: weshay|ruck: I have already reviewed the topic:f28_promotion - do you want them w+ to merge now?17:39
weshay|ruckrfolco, rlandy|rover as long as it doesn't break anything w/ current jobs, I'm +217:40
weshay|ruck+1 workflow17:40
rfolcowe don't know17:41
rfolconeed to merge and watch, not sure if panda is still on17:41
rlandy|roverok - well let's look for the non-breaking changes and get those in at least17:41
rlandy|roverrfolco: weshay|ruck: this is harmless - w+'ing it17:45
rlandy|roverhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17739/17:45
rlandy|roverhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17807/917:46
rlandy|roverbased on that17:47
*** holser_ has quit IRC17:48
rlandy|roverhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17807/ - w+17:48
rlandy|roverhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17739/ w+17:48
rlandy|roverbut needs rebase17:49
rlandy|roverhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17739/ - may need to rebase this17:53
rlandy|roverrfolco: ^^ can you?17:53
rfolcorlandy|rover, which one needs rebase17:54
rfolcolooking17:54
rlandy|roversee comments above17:54
rfolcorlandy|rover, can you w+ again17:56
rlandy|roverrfolco: we need to get the order right here17:58
rlandy|roverbottom up17:58
*** kopecmartin is now known as kopecmartin|off17:58
rlandy|roverhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17738/ - that is the bottom-most patch17:59
rlandy|rovercorrect?17:59
rlandy|roverwhy did panda only +1 it?17:59
rlandy|roverI + 2'ed17:59
rlandy|roverweshay|ruck: ha - fs020 - it's the idempotent test that stalls introspection18:01
rlandy|roveridk why though yet18:01
rfolconow https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17739/ should be safe to add18:03
rfolcorlandy|rover, ^18:03
*** derekh has quit IRC18:03
rfolcocontainers build should be safe too18:04
rfolcohttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17738/18:04
rfolcoand finally the one that may break the castle of cards: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17740/18:05
rfolcorlandy|rover, safe merge: 17738, 17739.... need to watch when merge: 1774018:06
rlandy|roverone at a time here18:06
rfolcopatches or people?18:07
*** ccamacho has quit IRC18:07
rlandy|roverrfolco: let's start with my question on the bottom-most patch https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17738/18:07
rlandy|roverwhy did panda only +1?18:08
rlandy|roverhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17738/10/ci-scripts/tripleo-upstream/build-containers-images.sh18:08
rlandy|rover^^ potential breaking change18:09
*** tosky has quit IRC18:09
rfolcorlandy|rover, if distro is not set, old behavior is in play18:09
rfolcoI did not change release at all18:10
rfolcoyou are right, release is not distro release, its openstack release18:10
*** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk18:11
rlandy|roverrfolco: ok - let's try 17738 and then 1773918:11
rlandy|roverand see what breaks18:11
rlandy|roverweshay|ruck: ^^ ok with that??18:11
rlandy|roversince no panda to confirm18:11
rfolcorlandy|rover, nothing will break until you add the job to the pipeline18:11
* weshay|ruck reads18:12
weshay|rucktry it w/ a testproject or try it how?18:13
rlandy|roverhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17738/10/ci-scripts/tripleo-upstream/build-containers-images.sh18:14
rlandy|roverhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17738/10/zuul.d/tripleo.yaml18:15
rlandy|rover^^ that will run18:15
rlandy|roverbut if it break - probably no big deal, right?18:15
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade, tripleo-ci-centos-7-containerized-undercloud-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstac18:16
weshay|ruckrlandy|rover, fyi.. david logged https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-gate/+bug/172109318:16
openstackLaunchpad bug 1721093 in OpenStack-Gate "Zuul v3 tasks can end up in an UNREACHABLE state" [Undecided,Confirmed]18:16
weshay|ruckrlandy|rover, blue18:16
weshay|ruckrfolco, ^18:18
weshay|ruckjoin my blue18:18
rfolcok18:18
*** dtrainor_ has joined #oooq18:23
*** dtrainor has quit IRC18:24
*** dtrainor__ has joined #oooq18:25
*** dtrainor_ has quit IRC18:28
*** dtrainor has joined #oooq18:54
*** dtrainor__ has quit IRC18:55
*** dtrainor_ has joined #oooq18:59
*** dtrainor has quit IRC19:01
*** dtrainor_ has quit IRC19:12
*** dtrainor_ has joined #oooq19:12
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade, tripleo-ci-centos-7-containerized-undercloud-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstac20:16
rlandy|roverweshay|ruck, is our bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1810054  a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-gate/+bug/1721093 or better to leave the two separate?20:34
openstackLaunchpad bug 1810054 in tripleo "mulitnode jobs failing on gathering facts from subnode-2" [Critical,Triaged] - Assigned to Ronelle Landy (rlandy)20:34
openstackLaunchpad bug 1721093 in OpenStack-Gate "Zuul v3 tasks can end up in an UNREACHABLE state" [Undecided,Confirmed]20:34
*** jtomasek has quit IRC20:51
weshay|ruckrlandy|rover, not sure tbh20:57
weshay|ruckrlandy|rover, one would think david would have duped them.. I think it's safe to dupe our bug to the infra bug..20:58
weshay|ruckthe duplicate bug stays open with the parent20:58
weshay|ruckunlike bugzilla20:58
rlandy|rovermakes sense21:06
*** rlandy|rover has quit IRC21:26
*** jfrancoa has joined #oooq21:29
*** trown is now known as trown|outtypewww22:04
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone-upgrade, tripleo-ci-centos-7-containerized-undercloud-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/ocata: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb- (1 more message)22:16
*** jfrancoa has quit IRC22:22
*** jaosorior has quit IRC22:42
*** jbadiapa has joined #oooq22:50
*** rascasoft has quit IRC23:12
*** holser_ has joined #oooq23:24
*** openstack has joined #oooq23:44
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o openstack23:44
« Thursday, 2019-01-03 Index Saturday, 2019-01-05 »

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!