Wednesday, 2018-11-14

hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario002-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/567224, stable/rocky: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq- (1 more message)00:48
*** tosky has quit IRC00:55
*** chem has quit IRC01:56
*** chem has joined #oooq01:57
weshayrlandy, we'll chat tomorrow I guess02:18
weshaysorry I missed your ping02:19
rlandyweshay, hi02:19
weshayoh hi02:19
weshay:)02:19
weshayrlandy, you are working too much you know02:19
rlandyweshay: np - working on nodepool-setup now - we can talk tomorrow02:19
rlandyweshay: reproducer has to be done now02:19
weshayrlandy, well.. relatively so.. there is no comet that will plunge into the earth and destroy us all if it's not02:20
weshay:)02:20
weshaytake it easy.. don't burn out02:20
rlandyyou don't know that for sure02:20
weshaylolz02:20
weshaylegit laughing02:20
rlandyanyways - will ping you again tomorrow - I checked the libvirt case02:21
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario002-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario002-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq- (1 more message)02:48
*** rlandy has quit IRC02:49
*** jaganathan has joined #oooq03:17
*** udesale has joined #oooq04:05
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario002-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario002-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq- (1 more message)04:48
*** udesale has quit IRC04:50
*** udesale has joined #oooq05:02
*** chandankumar has joined #oooq05:25
*** saneax has joined #oooq05:57
*** chandankumar is now known as chkumar|ruck06:04
*** d0ugal has quit IRC06:04
*** d0ugal has joined #oooq06:18
*** rfolco has quit IRC06:29
*** apetrich has quit IRC06:31
*** ratailor has joined #oooq06:35
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario002-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario002-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq- (1 more message)06:48
*** skramaja has joined #oooq07:11
*** gkadam has joined #oooq07:12
*** quiquell|off is now known as quiquell07:39
*** jfrancoa has joined #oooq07:54
*** ratailor_ has joined #oooq08:09
*** ratailor__ has joined #oooq08:11
*** ratailor has quit IRC08:12
*** ratailor has joined #oooq08:14
*** ratailor_ has quit IRC08:14
*** ratailor__ has quit IRC08:16
*** ratailor has quit IRC08:20
*** ratailor has joined #oooq08:22
*** tosky has joined #oooq08:42
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario002-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario002-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq- (1 more message)08:48
*** chem has quit IRC09:01
*** chem has joined #oooq09:01
*** apetrich has joined #oooq09:14
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej09:36
*** derekh has joined #oooq09:40
*** sanjayu_ has joined #oooq09:40
*** saneax has quit IRC09:41
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq09:48
*** jtomasek has quit IRC09:55
*** apetrich has quit IRC10:00
*** chem has quit IRC10:01
*** chem has joined #oooq10:02
*** chem has quit IRC10:06
*** chem has joined #oooq10:11
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq10:27
*** ccamacho has quit IRC10:27
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq10:27
*** jaganathan has quit IRC10:34
ssbarnea|bkp2i see some gate failures caused by rpm install conflict between podman and docker... i had the impression that podman change was reverted10:37
ssbarnea|bkp2panda: can you please check https://review.openstack.org/#/c/617363/3 ?10:46
ssbarnea|bkp2it has a minor typo in commit message but I don't want to waste another 8h waiting for another check to run.10:47
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario010-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario002-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone, tripleo-ci-centos-7-containerized-undercloud-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq- (4 more messages)10:48
chkumar|ruckssbarnea|bkp2, https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/180323210:49
openstackLaunchpad bug 1803232 in tripleo "podman 0.11.1 rpm conflicts with docker" [Critical,Triaged] - Assigned to Emilien Macchi (emilienm)10:49
ssbarnea|bkp2chkumar|ruck: ohh... thanks for clarification.  what is not clear to me is when I can retry the jobs.10:55
chkumar|ruckssbarnea|bkp2, no definite answer10:57
chkumar|ruckssbarnea|bkp2, currently blocked here now https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1803232/comments/1210:57
openstackLaunchpad bug 1803232 in tripleo "podman 0.11.1 rpm conflicts with docker" [Critical,Triaged] - Assigned to Emilien Macchi (emilienm)10:57
chkumar|ruckssbarnea|bkp2, feel free to update your patches, all jobs are going to fail during undercloud install10:58
*** udesale has quit IRC10:59
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq10:59
*** jtomasek has quit IRC11:04
*** rfolco has joined #oooq11:05
ssbarnea|bkp2i will focus on other tasks while this is broken, i have few things that do not involve 3o ci jobs.11:05
chkumar|ruckssbarnea|bkp2, let's wait for 1-2 hour, after that feel free to recheck11:28
chkumar|ruckssbarnea|bkp2, issue will be get fixed11:28
chkumar|ruckhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17349/ -> just workflow11:29
*** ratailor has quit IRC11:30
chkumar|ruckpanda, fix for tempest logstash https://review.openstack.org/#/c/617913/11:31
pandachkumar|ruck: queue has neve been so empty11:32
chkumar|ruckpanda, yes11:32
chkumar|ruckpanda, because of podman11:32
*** chem has quit IRC11:37
*** chem has joined #oooq11:44
pandawe should start adding the featureset number on the job name for standalone11:49
rfolcopanda, looks like tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq and tripleo-ci-centos-7-nonha-multinode-oooq run for newton/ocata only. Can I replace it with tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container ? what is a good replacement for these jobs that run on old branches ?11:54
pandarfolco: newton and ocata do not support containers.11:55
pandarfolco: why do you want to replace the jobs ?11:55
rfolcopanda, if I remove them, some projects will just stop running tripleo. Is this ok?11:56
rfolcothe idea was to move to pike and run containers instead11:56
rfolcoexample11:56
rfolcohttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/61759411:56
rfolcoopenstack/os-collect-config11:56
rfolcostable/ocata11:57
rfolcotripleo-ci-centos-7-nonha-multinode-oooq11:57
rfolcopanda, ^11:57
pandarfolco: not sure I understand. you want to test a ocata patch with jobs taht are supported only with pike ?11:58
rfolcopanda, stop running ocata jobs11:59
rfolcopanda, start running pike instead11:59
rfolcopanda, switch to container job11:59
rfolcopanda, panda panda11:59
pandarfolco: I'm still confused, wanna chat ?11:59
rfolcoyes11:59
pandajoining yuur bj12:00
rfolcok12:00
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq12:03
*** jtomasek has quit IRC12:07
*** jfrancoa has quit IRC12:08
*** jfrancoa has joined #oooq12:24
arxcruz|summitweshay: quiquell hey, sorry, only saw the message now12:38
arxcruz|summitweshay: quiquell i'll participate in the zuul onboarding session and i'll talk more about the zuul :)12:38
quiquellarxcruz|summit: hello there, then I have to show you something :-)12:39
quiquellarxcruz|summit: I go for lunch now12:39
*** quiquell is now known as quiquell|lunch12:40
chkumar|ruckpanda, weshay do we want to sync?12:41
chkumar|ruckin another 20 mins, we have program call12:41
pandachkumar|ruck: I can sink12:42
*** panda is now known as panda|rover12:42
chkumar|ruckpanda, https://redhat.bluejeans.com/1571313919/6145/?src=meet_now12:42
arxcruz|summitquiquell|lunch: sure later, i'm in a presentation now12:42
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario010-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario002-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone, tripleo-ci-centos-7-containerized-undercloud-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq- (4 more messages)12:48
*** trown|outtypewww is now known as trown13:01
chkumar|ruckpanda|rover, we donot have promotion for Rocky this week na?13:03
panda|roverchkumar|ruck: no13:04
chkumar|ruckweshay, ah you are there great :-)13:06
weshaychkumar|ruck, I got it ya :).. noting this is mainly focused on osp-1413:09
weshaythey don't really want to hear about much else13:09
chkumar|ruckweshay, ok, I will just read the comments you have written on the doc13:09
weshaychkumar|ruck, how's our tempest bug queue13:09
* weshay looks13:09
chkumar|ruckweshay, 5 new13:10
chkumar|ruckweshay, I need to triage them13:10
weshaychkumar|ruck++13:12
hubbot1weshay: chkumar|ruck's karma is now 213:12
weshaywe're not on the list!!!13:12
chkumar|ruckweshay, I am reducing it 1413:12
weshaywooot13:13
weshaywell done13:13
chkumar|ruckweshay, oh, we are pulled on triaged13:14
*** rlandy has joined #oooq13:14
*** jaosorior has joined #oooq13:14
*** jaosorior has quit IRC13:18
weshaypanda|rover, fyi https://review.openstack.org/#/c/617362/413:21
chkumar|ruckweshay, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/617913/13:23
chkumar|ruckregarding tempest logstash issue13:23
*** matbu has quit IRC13:23
*** matbu has joined #oooq13:25
*** udesale has joined #oooq13:27
weshaychkumar|ruck, I got it13:28
chkumar|ruckweshay, thanks :-)13:28
weshaychkumar|ruck, fuckers.. there is a part of the year where most of this is unrelated13:29
weshayto us13:29
weshayonce we release osp-14 our status will be critical once again13:29
chkumar|ruckarxcruz|summit, for tempest log file review tempest_log_file is defined twice in defaults and Readme also13:29
chkumar|ruckweshay, yes13:30
chkumar|ruckweshay, we have highest number of failure today 344713:30
arxcruz|summitchkumar|ruck: oh, got it13:30
chkumar|ruckon rdo periodic job13:30
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch13:31
arxcruz|summitweshay: i guess we will skip our 1-1 ?13:31
arxcruz|summit:P13:31
arxcruz|summitbut i have some free time if you want to sync with me and quiquell|lunch13:31
chkumar|ruckweshay, while adding you as a reviewer it always complain13:31
chkumar|ruckarxcruz|summit, enjoy the summit :-)13:32
*** quiquell|lunch is now known as quiquell13:32
arxcruz|summitchkumar|ruck: i have your rdo duck btw ;)13:32
chkumar|ruckarxcruz|summit, thanks man :-)13:32
weshayarxcruz|summit, oh13:32
weshayI'm avail if you13:32
weshayarxcruz|summit, if you want to chat13:32
arxcruz|summitweshay: i'm already in your bj13:32
weshayup to you13:32
weshaylolz13:32
weshayk13:32
*** jfrancoa has quit IRC13:33
arxcruz|summiti have to wait 40 minutes for the next talk13:33
weshaychkumar|ruck, 3347 failures where?13:33
weshayupstream13:33
chkumar|ruckweshay, sorry from dashboard on rdo periodic jobs13:33
weshayquiquell, be ready to join my blue pleas13:33
chkumar|ruckweshay, http://dashboard-ci.tripleo.org/d/cEEjGFFmz/cockpit?orgId=1&from=now-5m&to=now&refresh=10s13:33
weshayI see ya13:33
quiquellweshay: ready, wait a fiew or connect now '13:33
rfolcorlandy, ping13:33
rlandyrfolco: hello13:34
rfolcoquick question13:34
panda|roveramoralej|lunch: do you have 10 minutes for me after lunch ?13:34
weshaychkumar|ruck, we need to land https://review.openstack.org/#/c/616937/10 panda|rover fyi13:34
chkumar|ruckweshay, https://review.rdoproject.org/etherpad/p/ruckrover-sprint2213:34
rfolcorlandy, https://github.com/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/blob/c58b8416873072384a8497bfd8fd4cf0d3ed14c8/zuul.d/multinode-jobs.yaml#L58 --> you know if these jobs under tripleo-multinode-baremetal-full run anywhere ?13:34
chkumar|ruckweshay, check line no: 23, 24, 2513:34
panda|roverweshay: yes, we were waiting a bit more to recheck those three patches13:35
chkumar|ruckI think we need all those13:35
weshaypanda|rover, chkumar|ruck I just asked Emilien, feel free to push the patches we need forward13:35
chkumar|ruckweshay, sure13:35
chkumar|ruckpanda|rover, weshay I am logging out, need to visit some friends see ya, feel free to drop me an email or tag me on etherpad13:36
rlandyrfolco: lol - never seen that used13:36
chkumar|ruckweshay, I tried to reproduce vexhost tempest failure but blocked on podman13:36
rlandybut it probably is somewhere13:36
weshaychkumar|ruck, ok.. thank you13:36
chkumar|rucksee ya13:36
rlandyironic stuff?13:37
*** chkumar|ruck has quit IRC13:37
rfolcorlandy, whats what I guessed, I see many inconsistency in our jobs, doing some cleanup13:37
weshayquiquell, you have a sec?13:41
quiquellweshay: sure13:41
weshayhttps://bluejeans.com/u/whayutin/13:41
weshayrlandy, you too please13:42
weshayssbarnea|bkp2, https://bluejeans.com/u/whayutin/13:43
rlandyjoining13:46
weshayrlandy, ok.. will introduce your topic in a sec13:46
weshaywhen queue is done13:46
*** jfrancoa has joined #oooq13:47
*** ccamacho has quit IRC13:51
*** matbu has quit IRC13:51
*** matbu has joined #oooq13:53
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq13:53
*** devep has joined #oooq14:03
weshaypanda|rover, did chandan look at the volumeboot tempest issue today?14:25
panda|roverweshay: we didn't discuss in the sync, but there are bullets points in the etherpad he added today to yesterdays issues. L42 and L4314:28
weshayk14:29
* weshay looks14:29
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej14:30
amoralejpanda|rover, how can i help14:30
weshaypanda|rover, can you update the readme here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/617913/14:30
panda|roveramoralej: if you have time to look at the existing rdoinfo with me14:30
weshayarxcruz|summit, is right14:30
amoralejsure14:30
amoralejand i'm also planning some changes in rdoinfo to improve gating14:31
amoralejwe can discuss14:31
panda|roverweshay: ok, enqueueing14:31
panda|roveramoralej: you have time now ?14:31
amoralejgive me just 3 minutes14:31
panda|roveramoralej: sure14:31
panda|roverweshay: mmhh, where is arxcruz|summit right about the readme ? tempest_log_file was defined twice in the README and chandar removed one occurence only14:36
* weshay looks14:37
panda|roverinstead,m I don't see where is its default defined14:37
weshay* `tempest_log_file`: <file name> - The name of tempest log file (default: tempest.log)14:37
weshayah ur right14:37
panda|roverthe new tempest.log default14:37
panda|roveroh now I see it14:38
*** agopi has quit IRC14:41
amoralejpanda|rover, ready?14:43
amoraleji'm back14:44
panda|roveramoralej: my bj ?14:44
amoralejok14:44
*** saneax has joined #oooq14:46
*** sanjayu_ has quit IRC14:48
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario010-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario002-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone, tripleo-ci-centos-7-containerized-undercloud-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq- (4 more messages)14:48
weshaypanda|rover, before you leave today.. please make sure you have briefed me on the master containers build job14:57
*** gkadam has quit IRC14:58
*** agopi has joined #oooq15:00
*** agopi_ has joined #oooq15:01
*** agopi has quit IRC15:04
*** skramaja has quit IRC15:06
*** agopi_ is now known as agopi15:06
*** chem has quit IRC15:07
*** apetrich has joined #oooq15:09
*** kopecmartin has joined #oooq15:20
*** kopecmartin has quit IRC15:22
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq15:35
ssbarnea|bkp2does any one know how canonical projects are tested? i was trying to find some info about some python libraries that we are used like launchpadlib but I fail to find any proof of "CI" around...15:59
*** jrist has quit IRC15:59
*** tosky has quit IRC16:00
*** tosky has joined #oooq16:00
panda|roverssbarnea|bkp2: devstack16:04
ssbarnea|bkp2panda|rover: this has nothing to do with openstack, launchpadlib is unrelated to openstack.16:07
*** ccamacho has quit IRC16:07
*** irclogbot_0 has quit IRC16:08
*** irclogbot_0 has joined #oooq16:09
*** vkapalav has joined #oooq16:11
*** jrist has joined #oooq16:12
panda|roverssbarnea|bkp2: so I don't understand what a canonical project is ...16:18
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq16:23
rfolcoweshay, get 5 min for me ?16:31
mariosrfolco: o/16:32
rfolcohey marios16:32
mariosis there a reason we are explicitly only allowing featureset_override for tempest things?16:32
mariosrfolco: like can we add something new?16:32
mariosrfolco: chandan had a great idea about overriding for the standalone scenario116:32
rfolcomarios, during design of that feature we decided to validate what can be overriden16:33
mariosrfolco: like https://review.openstack.org/#/c/616872/11/zuul.d/standalone-jobs.yaml@6516:33
mariosrfolco: then we can avoid having new featuresets?16:33
rfolcomarios, that is on the table for sure16:34
mariosweshay: wdyt? ^^^ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/616872/11/zuul.d/standalone-jobs.yaml@65 via discussion at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/616871/4/config/general_config/featureset060.yml16:34
mariosrfolco: i like16:34
mariosrfolco: it is neat and does exactly what we want. it breaks if we actually need a new featureset16:34
weshaysec.. talking to Emilien16:34
mariosrfolco: i mean if we want to do something other than override for tripleo-heat-templates environment16:34
mariosrfolco: otherwise, if that is the only difference betwen the standalone scenario jobs its a tidy design16:35
mariosrfolco: i'd say we do this by default, and if we need to in particular cases have new featuresets.16:35
rfolcomarios, the simpler the better16:35
*** ccamacho has quit IRC16:35
rfolcoonly add new fs if you have to hack beyond tht16:35
mariosrfolco: right so we just have an override in the job definition16:35
mariosrfolco: is simple16:36
mariosrfolco: cos so far we are gonna carry a copy of fs52 only with override for an env file16:36
*** udesale has quit IRC16:36
marios(until we know something different that is)16:36
rfolcoI approve the idea, not sure if we are ignoring some important fact though16:36
rfolcoyep on the same page :)16:36
rfolcowe are16:36
mariosrfolco: ack gonna make it so on the review and we can point at specific things...16:37
rfolcomarios, good start man16:37
mariosrfolco: the current v 11 at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/616872/ is already doing that and avoids the depends on for the featureset (instead depend directly on tht change) but fails for 2018-11-14 16:31:50.026046 | primary |   "msg": "ERROR: standalone_custom_env_files is not overridable."16:39
rlandymarios: https://review.openstack.org/617997 Add a new role to clone repos and include zuul changes16:39
mariosrfolco: fixing it now (doing that i mean it just overrides in the job)16:39
rlandymarios: there are comments in a bunch of files16:39
mariosrfolco: thank you16:39
mariosrlandy: err thanks ^16:39
mariosrfolco: you too thanks for the sanity check on the idea16:39
rfolcomarios, do you get a review to allow overriding the new setting ?16:39
rlandymarios: feel free to edit as you see fit16:40
mariosrfolco: posted v12 now with the override for the featureset_override :)16:41
mariosrfolco: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/616872/12/playbooks/tripleo-ci/run-v3.yaml16:42
rfolcomarios, excellent :)16:42
rlandymarios: we have have a tangle of rebased patches - but ok - I guess that's tomorrow's fun to sort that out16:42
mariosrfolco: i'm also constraining it so only this job is running16:42
* rlandy goes back to inventory work16:42
mariosrlandy: thanks very much i will likely get to that in the morning16:42
weshayrfolco, marios hey16:43
rfolcoweshay, need to chat16:43
rfolcowould you ?16:43
weshayk.. blue16:43
mariosweshay: summary is: chandan had a great idea here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/616871/4/config/general_config/featureset060.yml and i am trying it out with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/616872/ ... allows us to skip a new featureset if all we are doing is overriding for a single tripleo-heat-tenplates environment. so we do this instead https://review.openstack.org/#/c/616872/12/zuul.d/standalone-jobs.yaml@6416:44
*** jfrancoa has quit IRC16:44
mariosweshay: (is the thing me and rfolco were just discussing, but he also wants to chat other stuff urelated, just fyi ^ thanks)16:45
weshaymarios, this is dangerous16:45
weshaystandalone_custom_env_files:16:45
weshay          - /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/ci/environments/scenario001-standalone.yaml16:45
weshayright?16:45
mariosweshay: right16:45
mariosweshay: so we can just get away with that if they are ALL copies of fs 5216:45
mariosweshay: and even if they aren't we can create fs whenif we need16:45
mariosrather than make 10 of them just to point to 10 different env files16:45
weshayya.. my preference is that only the tests are overrideable in zuul16:45
weshaynot anything that controls the deployment16:46
weshaymarios, my thought is16:46
mariosweshay: hm so you push back to this and prefer a new featureset?16:46
mariosrfolco: ^16:46
weshaywhen other projects start to use this16:46
weshaythese jobs16:46
mariosweshay: yeah but we can control this though right? i mean via the allowed override list16:46
weshaythey should not be able to use deployment that we are not also using16:46
weshayright16:47
mariosweshay: and this seems to be a legitimate CI need/not deployment16:47
marioss/need/requirement16:47
weshaymarios, ya.. so I would prefer - /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates/ci/environments/scenario001-standalone.yaml16:48
weshaygoes to the fs file16:48
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario010-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario002-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone, tripleo-ci-centos-7-containerized-undercloud-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq- (4 more messages)16:48
mariosweshay: well OK, i don't think i'll update further today at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/616872/ but this is the reason we post the reviews so we can shape the designi on specific things. please add a comment there if you get a chance and i'll update tomorrow to keep the FS16:48
mariosweshay: the new featureset 60 i mean16:49
mariosweshay: i would still argue for this to be allowed since it is implementing a CI requirement not a deployment one16:49
mariosweshay: but using a featureset is more in line with how folks would expect this to be done16:49
mariosi mean like other jobs16:49
weshaymarios, jump on my blue16:56
weshaymarios, chatting w/ rfolco re: job config16:57
weshaymarios, let's nail this down16:57
mariosweshay: sec, firing up bluejeans16:57
mariospanda|rover: gonna have to be tomorrow i think :/16:58
*** jtomasek has quit IRC17:04
weshaymarios, rfolco https://docs.openstack.org/tripleo-docs/latest/contributor/check_gates.html17:07
weshayhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/616592/17:08
*** agopi is now known as agopi|food17:10
mariosweshay: rfolco thanks folks glad we sorted that will update https://review.openstack.org/#/c/616872/12 tomorrow17:10
rfolcomarios, good job, thanks17:13
*** devep has quit IRC17:15
*** chem has joined #oooq17:28
panda|roverweshay:  about to go, want to sync for 5 minutes ?17:30
weshaypanda|rover, sure17:35
weshayhttps://bluejeans.com/411356779817:36
*** panda|rover is now known as panda|rover|off17:47
*** agopi|food is now known as agopi18:00
*** chem has quit IRC18:03
*** derekh has quit IRC18:04
*** chandankumar has joined #oooq18:07
*** devep has joined #oooq18:09
*** trown is now known as trown|lunch18:19
*** jrist has quit IRC18:43
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario010-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario002-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-standalone, tripleo-ci-centos-7-containerized-undercloud-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq- (4 more messages)18:48
*** chandankumar has quit IRC18:53
*** jrist has joined #oooq18:55
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq18:58
weshayrlandy, k.. ready in about 10min18:59
rlandyweshay: sure - no rush19:00
*** devep has quit IRC19:01
weshayrlandy, in my blue19:15
rlandyk - joined19:15
*** trown|lunch is now known as trown19:28
*** jtomasek has quit IRC19:42
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq19:48
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off19:48
*** apetrich has quit IRC19:57
*** apetrich has joined #oooq20:10
ssbarnea|bkp2weshay: or marios can you please block https://review.openstack.org/#/c/616579/5 ?20:27
ssbarnea|bkp2i am almost sure that this change would break tripleoclient20:27
* weshay reads20:27
ssbarnea|bkp2i don't have an ansible-playbook-2 on my system.20:28
ssbarnea|bkp2and I bet lots of people do not have.20:28
weshayssbarnea|bkp2, there is another change that links it20:28
ssbarnea|bkp2weshay: sorry but we are not supposed to hack system. that's not the way to do it.20:29
weshayssbarnea|bkp2, you are not running ansible-playbook that the undercloud uses on your system20:29
ssbarnea|bkp2it should be usable on a pure/clean system.20:29
weshayssbarnea|bkp2, the right way to do this ssbarnea|bkp220:29
weshayis to go to #tripleo20:29
weshayand I can help you make a case20:29
weshayssbarnea|bkp2, I am not core on python-tripleoclient btw.. I have the power to -2, but I should not20:30
ssbarnea|bkp2sure, i am sorry that didn't see it earlier. sure...20:30
weshayssbarnea|bkp2++20:31
hubbot1weshay: ssbarnea|bkp2's karma is now 120:31
weshaynice approach20:31
*** jtomasek has quit IRC20:33
weshayssbarnea|bkp2, is that making sense?20:36
ssbarnea|bkp2sure.20:44
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario002-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci- (1 more message)20:48
ssbarnea|bkp2weshay: ok sorted. now if you can have a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/617363/ it would be great, the b'' output was a major PITA in the past months.20:51
*** agopi is now known as agopi|brb20:54
*** agopi|brb has quit IRC20:58
weshayssbarnea|bkp2, k21:16
weshayssbarnea|bkp2++21:25
hubbot1weshay: ssbarnea|bkp2's karma is now 221:25
*** trown is now known as trown|outtypewww21:53
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario002-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci- (1 more message)22:48
weshayrlandy, for the gate fix https://review.openstack.org/#/c/61800822:51
*** chem has joined #oooq23:49

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!