Friday, 2018-10-26

*** agopi|brb has quit IRC00:00
*** agopi|brb has joined #oooq00:37
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset053, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset035 @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb- (3 more messages)00:37
*** agopi|brb has quit IRC00:39
*** agopi|brb has joined #oooq00:39
*** dsneddon2 has joined #oooq01:14
*** dsneddon3 has joined #oooq01:14
*** dsneddon__ has quit IRC01:16
*** dsneddon_ has quit IRC01:18
*** huynq has joined #oooq01:20
*** dsneddon2 has quit IRC01:55
*** dsneddon2 has joined #oooq01:56
*** dsneddon2 has quit IRC02:12
*** dsneddon2 has joined #oooq02:20
*** dsneddon2 has quit IRC02:25
*** dsneddon2 has joined #oooq02:29
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset053, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset035 @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @  (3 more messages)02:37
*** dsneddon2 has quit IRC02:40
*** dsneddon2 has joined #oooq02:43
*** dsneddon2 has quit IRC02:48
*** dsneddon2 has joined #oooq02:52
*** dsneddon2 has quit IRC03:09
*** dsneddon2 has joined #oooq03:09
*** dsneddon2 has quit IRC03:18
*** ykarel|away has joined #oooq03:25
*** dsneddon2 has joined #oooq03:26
*** dsneddon2 has quit IRC03:30
*** dsneddon2 has joined #oooq03:47
*** udesale has joined #oooq03:51
*** dsneddon2 has quit IRC03:56
*** dsneddon2 has joined #oooq04:05
*** dsneddon2 has quit IRC04:09
*** dsneddon2 has joined #oooq04:23
*** dsneddon2 has quit IRC04:32
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-queens-branch, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 (2 more messages)04:38
*** dsneddon2 has joined #oooq04:48
*** dsneddon2 has quit IRC04:53
*** dsneddon2 has joined #oooq05:02
*** dsneddon2 has quit IRC05:11
*** dsneddon2 has joined #oooq05:25
*** jaganathan has joined #oooq05:35
*** ratailor has joined #oooq05:35
*** trown has joined #oooq05:49
*** kopecmartin has joined #oooq05:50
*** dsneddon2 has quit IRC05:51
*** dsneddon2 has joined #oooq05:52
*** quiquell|off is now known as quiquell05:53
*** irclogbot_0 has quit IRC05:55
*** apetrich has quit IRC05:55
*** kopecmartin|off has quit IRC05:55
*** nhicher has quit IRC05:55
*** cgoncalves has quit IRC05:55
*** chkumar|off has quit IRC05:55
*** trown|outtypewww has quit IRC05:55
*** apetrich has joined #oooq06:02
*** dsneddon2 has quit IRC06:04
*** chandankumar has joined #oooq06:06
*** dsneddon2 has joined #oooq06:08
*** ykarel|away is now known as ykarel06:10
ykarelquiquell, ssbarnea|bkp2 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/610491/13 still failing  The error was: 'ansible_user_dir' is undefined06:10
*** dsneddon2 has quit IRC06:13
*** dsneddon2 has joined #oooq06:17
quiquellykarel: ack, will look into it06:18
*** ccamacho has quit IRC06:20
*** holser_ has joined #oooq06:33
*** dsneddon2 has quit IRC06:34
*** holser_ has quit IRC06:35
quiquellykarel: Looks like now we have only the  ansible_user_dir if we run it with become: yes06:36
quiquellykarel: Going to try one thing06:37
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-queens-branch, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 (2 more messages)06:38
quiquellykarel: uploaded ps let's see if it works06:39
*** dsneddon2 has joined #oooq06:40
quiquellshit... I have remove it from gates... :-(06:40
quiquellykarel: The other jobs were working fine ?06:41
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq06:41
ykarelquiquell, as per https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds?job_name=tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-pike-branch it's passing06:43
ykarelbut in that patch i have never seen it passing06:43
ykarelso if that merges without, upstream ovb jobs would have new failures apart from infra06:44
ykarelwithout fixing06:44
quiquellykarel: I don't kno wwhat's the difference between them and the other jobes06:44
quiquellThey run at RDO...06:45
quiquellholy jesus...06:45
quiquellEven branchless OVB jobs are failing at build-test-pakages https://logs.rdoproject.org/91/610491/13/openstack-check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset035/ae36430/job-output.txt.gz#_2018-10-25_13_28_22_30833706:46
ykarelyes all are affected, i shared the one as an example06:46
quiquellykarel: all RDO that's right ?06:46
ykarelyes06:46
ykarelovb ones06:46
quiquellykarel: Maybe it affects our periodic jobs too06:48
*** dsneddon2 has quit IRC06:48
*** ccamacho has quit IRC06:49
ykarelquiquell, there we don't build packages06:50
ykarelso at least this error will not be there06:50
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq06:51
*** dsneddon2 has joined #oooq06:52
quiquellykarel: It's a clean up stuff I think it's not conditional06:57
*** quiquell is now known as quiquell|brb06:57
quiquell|brbGo back in a few06:58
quiquell|brbBut want to understand why we don' thave ansible_user_dir06:58
quiquell|brbIt can affect post build-test-package roles06:58
quiquell|brbAnd affect  periodic jobs they run at RDO06:58
quiquell|brbThis can be more important than just "third party jobs" thing06:59
ykareli didn't dig much on it so can't say, ssbarnea|bkp2 may have some idea07:00
*** dsneddon2 has quit IRC07:00
*** dsneddon2 has joined #oooq07:03
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej07:06
*** dsneddon2 has quit IRC07:08
*** dsneddon2 has joined #oooq07:09
*** quiquell|brb is now known as quiquell07:14
quiquellykarel: I see  multinode at RDO is passing07:15
ykarelquiquell,07:16
ykarel<ykarel> yes07:16
ykarel<ykarel> ovb ones07:16
ykarelone which consumes: https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/blob/master/playbooks/ovb-setup.yml07:16
quiquellykarel: Huff there is a lot of gather_facts there and also setting ansible_user07:20
quiquellykarel: That's no good07:20
ykarelno idea, good to check reasoning why it's there07:21
ykarelmay be git history or the person worked there have idea07:21
quiquellykarel: Good finding though07:21
quiquellykarel: That's all stuff we have to adapt it for sure07:21
quiquellykarel: The problem is OVB were failing so much at networkiing issue that we were not looking at them07:22
ykarelack, but good to check there results to avoid merging bad stuffs07:23
quiquellykarel: Ok my fix works, but now it fails later on07:23
quiquellhttps://logs.rdoproject.org/91/610491/14/openstack-check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset053/a91574d/job-output.txt.gz07:23
ykarelack, good to fix all before merging please07:23
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|lunch07:24
*** holser_ has joined #oooq07:34
*** dsneddon_ has joined #oooq07:36
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq07:37
ssbarnea|bkp2ykarel|lunch quiquell : i have no idea what is causing this failure because it does not make any sense for that change to have this side effect07:37
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: I have fix that point adding another gather_fact, but now it fails later on07:37
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: At another one, we have to fix this, sorry about missing gates :-(07:38
*** dsneddon3 has quit IRC07:38
*** dsneddon2 has quit IRC07:38
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: noop ovb have no issues there07:39
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: It make sense to add another patch to gather the new missing var ?07:39
ssbarnea|bkp2patch will not merge, failed again due to infra on one job http://logs.openstack.org/77/612677/8/gate/tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-updates/2d02f44/job-output.txt.gz07:40
ssbarnea|bkp2related to browbeat stuff,... failed to download the huge numpy07:40
*** bogdando has joined #oooq07:41
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2, ykarel|lunch: Good one https://logs.rdoproject.org/45/560445/171/openstack-check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-rocky-branch/1012a45/job-output.txt.gz07:42
quiquellbad one https://logs.rdoproject.org/91/610491/13/openstack-check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-rocky-branch/fa6f0e4/job-output.txt.gz#_2018-10-25_13_43_16_63894107:42
*** tosky has joined #oooq07:46
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: Why now we need gather_subset: "!min,python_version"07:47
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: And the others ?07:47
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: Have we change something in the gathering ?07:47
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: undercloud-setup is run before build-test-package I think that's the change that it's affecting OVB07:51
*** dsneddon_ has quit IRC07:51
*** dsneddon has quit IRC07:51
*** dsneddon_ has joined #oooq07:52
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq07:52
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: confirmed at OVB 'gather ansible_pkg_mgr' get executed07:54
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: at multinode don't07:54
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: everytime we do a gather min it cleans up the other facts I think07:57
ssbarnea|bkp2let me give some background, we seen errors about missing some facts (the ones gathered).07:58
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: Also confirmed that containers skips "gather ansible_pkg_mgr"07:58
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: They don't install packages I suppose07:58
ssbarnea|bkp2i also discovered that values of the facts depends on the become value at the time of the gathering,... something that was happening outside the roles07:59
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: I can fix the new missing one, but I don't know if it's going to be proper solution07:59
ssbarnea|bkp2mainly if you run with become: ansible_user_dir will be root and stay root even if your next task does not run as root....07:59
ssbarnea|bkp2even worse: become seems to be inheritable, which means that you have no ... idea what you will get.08:00
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: forget about become08:00
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: problem is gather_subset: "!min08:00
ssbarnea|bkp2also ansible_user_dir is included in implicit "min" set of facts, so "!min" makes it gather nothign.08:01
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: Looks like it reset previous gatherings08:01
quiquelleven ansible_user_dir08:01
ssbarnea|bkp2ohh... it should not but I am going to test right now.... i am starting to hate the person that wrote the setup module....08:01
ssbarnea|bkp2i assumed it does not do any resets, but this may explain it.08:02
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: Just my guts talking to me08:02
ssbarnea|bkp2test, test, test.08:02
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: !min undefines the min08:03
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: "Values can also be used with an initial ! to specify that that specific subset should not be collected"08:03
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: So it really resets min vars and collect the one you put after08:04
quiquell"To avoid collecting even the min subset, specify !all,!min"08:04
quiquellSo we call undecloud-setup that cleans up min subset08:05
quiquellThat's all08:05
quiquellwe have to do08:05
quiquellall!,variable08:05
quiquellall! does not cleanup min (even a little missleading08:05
ssbarnea|bkp2what?1... OMFG.  setup module written by the devil. can you confirm it?  so solution is "!all,!min,farname". ?08:06
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: I think solution is !all,foobar.."08:07
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: Doing a small test08:07
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: give me a min08:07
ssbarnea|bkp2trying the same,...08:07
ssbarnea|bkp2not true: apparently works as I was expecting: https://gist.github.com/ssbarnea/1fbd691dc5f637ce2a785b45c18b1bcf08:09
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: Yep for me too08:09
quiquell:-/08:09
ssbarnea|bkp2time to downgrade ansible to match our version and try to use it inside a role, maybe there is something special about the usage in a role.08:10
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: The thing is, that setup are not suppose to reset previously gathered stuff08:11
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: It does not gather what you specify with ! but it does not undefine them either (Or it suppose to)08:11
ssbarnea|bkp2my theory is that this error comes from another place, not our code. still need to fix it.08:12
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: We can do the gathering at all places for OVB but I don't know if this is a good solution08:12
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: What do you think ?08:12
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: wait08:13
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: The question is, why "ansible_pkg_mgr" is not defined at OVB but it's defined at multinode08:14
ssbarnea|bkp2i thin i know, putting a fix now.08:19
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: what is ?08:20
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: I found weird that ansible_pkg_mgr is defined at multinode jobs but not the case at OVB08:20
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: At least the condition say so08:20
ssbarnea|bkp2this depends on what happens before the role is called, best to make the role work regardless preexisting conditions08:22
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: So we force gather stuff one by one ?08:23
ssbarnea|bkp2yep, whenever we find such case we add gatherings at the begining of the role(s). when we will start testing roles it will be easier to catch locally (molecule)08:23
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: ok I have already put one at the review08:24
quiquellnext one was ansible_distribution08:24
ssbarnea|bkp2quiquell: where? please show me the error line08:25
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: have some time for blue ? is going to be easier08:25
quiquellmarios: ovb not affected by this, we can workflow it https://review.openstack.org/#/c/61263308:27
ssbarnea|bkp2https://bluejeans.com/265541792808:27
chandankumarpanda|off: arxcruz kopecmartin please have a look at this card https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/us/19308:30
*** ccamacho has quit IRC08:32
*** panda|off is now known as panda08:32
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq08:33
*** rfolco|rover has quit IRC08:35
quiquellmarios: thanks08:36
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci- (3 more messages)08:38
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: btw, are you ok with this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/612290  ?08:38
quiquellpanda: Can you help with f28 job review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/612290/  ?08:41
quiquellmarios: Already changed commit msg ^08:41
pandaquiquell: looking08:42
*** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel08:42
quiquellpanda, marios: Also this one can be workflowed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/613084/08:42
*** holser_ has quit IRC08:45
ssbarnea|bkp2to read during coffee break https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/stable-2.7/changelogs/CHANGELOG-v2.7.rst#v2-7-108:50
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: Could be fedora28 ansible-python3 more restrictive ?08:51
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: maybe ansible.cfg there ?08:51
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/task/285?kanban-status=144727508:51
ssbarnea|bkp2since Ansible 1.9~ i read each new release notes, proved to save me a lot of time (avoding bugs)08:51
ssbarnea|bkp2quiquell: nice catch! wonder why linting didn't catch it.08:52
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: Yes but why not is an error and not a warning ? it was a warning before08:53
ssbarnea|bkp2well, i remember not getting much help on addressing warnings, maybe this will change. i can post a long list of pending reviews.08:54
ssbarnea|bkp2quiquell panda chandankumar https://review.openstack.org/#/c/611844/08:54
ssbarnea|bkp2another one https://review.openstack.org/#/c/611853/08:56
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: you have my little +108:56
chandankumarssbarnea|bkp2: mine also, can we https://review.openstack.org/#/c/611844/3/roles/tripleo-validations/tasks/main.yml@3 something meaningful?08:57
ssbarnea|bkp2chandankumar: true that it could be better, on my defense "name is unique" which is good enough for me to find it with grep ;)08:58
chandankumarssbarnea|bkp2: :-)08:59
ssbarnea|bkp2maybe one day we can enable linting errors on missing names, 2020-ish08:59
ssbarnea|bkp2i would personally prefer to merge it like this without waiting one day for a new check08:59
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: Is the only way, clean up everything then turn warning to errors, is what I did at previous jobs09:00
ssbarnea|bkp2we will never be able to "clean up everything", but we can do it feature by feauture: addressing each issue and enabling it. is a progressive work, also a never ending one.09:01
ssbarnea|bkp2clean everything works for small projects, especially ones with small number of changes.09:01
ssbarnea|bkp2by the time I fix one problem, someone will merge a breakage.09:01
ssbarnea|bkp2on the other hand there is something brilliant able using pre-commit for linting: it can lint just the file you are touching. meaning that we can put "severe" rules for touched files only, forcing people to fix them when they touch the file.09:02
ssbarnea|bkp2so instead of fixing 200 files, you make people fix them when they need a change to them.09:03
ssbarnea|bkp2"delegation" ;)09:03
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: Can we activate  "warning to errors" per role ?09:04
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: so we clean the mines and put some enemies detector09:04
ssbarnea|bkp2i doubt that is easily doable, anyway time to go back to f28 stuff. for the moment lets fix what we find. for me is easy to spot them because they are highligted on logs due to https://github.com/openstack/coats (bit of product placement)09:06
quiquellmarios, panda: Let's merge the fedora release file, so we don't fail fast at the f28 job https://review.openstack.org/#/c/610468/09:06
quiquellwill be easier to debug small changes to make it work09:06
bogdandohi, please merge https://review.openstack.org/#/c/610039/09:09
bogdandoand https://review.openstack.org/#/c/603069/ . thanks09:10
ssbarnea|bkp2does anyone know away to move an issue in taiga? having them separated makes hard to track them09:18
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: what do you mean with move ?09:20
pandapeople are going to hat e me today09:21
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: You can drag them09:21
quiquellpanda: more ?09:21
pandaI'm -1 everything so far09:21
quiquellpanda: why ?09:21
pandaquiquell: yeah, I know it's difficult to hate me more09:21
quiquellpanda: we can try :-P09:21
pandaquiquell: for various reasons09:21
pandassbarnea|bkp2: move an issue ?09:21
ssbarnea|bkp2quiquell: so they will be listed as part of the story. cannot reliably drag and scroll few screens as the same time. we need to raise a bug on taiga about this. it should be assignable from edit screen.09:21
pandassbarnea|bkp2: still don't understand what you're trying to do09:22
ssbarnea|bkp2mainly i want to convert an issue to a task, but i am afraid is not possible09:23
ssbarnea|bkp2another question would be why I often see issue marked with "NEW" inside the "DONE" column. In fact it seems that the status of an issue is unrelated to the column: see https://s3.sbarnea.com/ss/181026-Sprint_21Unified_Sprint_0_-_Sprint_taskboard_-_TripleO_CI_production_.png09:25
pandassbarnea|bkp2: the issue area is separated from the rest09:27
pandassbarnea|bkp2: it has no columns09:27
pandassbarnea|bkp2: and yes issues are issues, cannot be automatically converted to task, you'll have to create a task and copy the informations manually09:28
quiquellpanda: Can you elaborate on -1 stuff ?09:28
pandassbarnea|bkp2: but it should happen often that you create an issue for a user story we have, they should topic external to what we have for scheduling in sprints09:28
pandaquiquell: -1 on releae file stuff09:29
pandassbarnea|bkp2: -1 on ansible-playbook-3 review09:29
pandayou get a -1, you get a -1, everybody gets a -109:29
quiquellpanda: That -1 is legit you are right about defaults, release file will everride it09:31
quiquellpanda: I was thinking that you going to put -1 for a bigger issue09:31
pandaquiquell: why would you think that ?09:32
quiquellpanda: Not enough coffe maybe09:32
quiquellpanda: Also you know better the big picture of stuff09:33
quiquellpanda: So maybe we were missing something09:33
quiquellpanda, marios: Fixed the release file https://review.openstack.org/61046809:36
quiquellpanda: commented https://review.openstack.org/#/c/61229009:41
pandassbarnea|bkp2: why are we moving to use ansible from package ?09:50
pandaor quiquell09:51
pandaquiquell: also the commit message is about fedora28, but the change is changinthe workflow for everything09:51
quiquellpanda: I suppose we have to use the stuff from DLRN09:53
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: ^ isn't that right ?09:54
pandaquiquell: we setup dlrn repo in quickstart, that is after we install ansible09:55
*** saneax has joined #oooq09:58
quiquellpanda: Then the question if why we want to install from PIP to pin the ansible version ?10:01
quiquellpanda: btw, quickstart.sh is already installing ansible, so for centos7 we are using the ansible from pip I think10:02
quiquell:-/10:02
quiquellpanda: Also maybe this review is totally wrong and we have to depend on ansible install by quickstart.sh10:05
pandaquiquell: yes10:09
pandaquiquell: also, the install script will take care of the dependencies10:09
pandaquiquell: the unified10:09
quiquellpanda: Ok, after sorin changes quickstart.sh is suppose to install ansible with python3 pip install10:09
quiquellpanda: So it has to be the right now10:10
quiquellpanda: But it will be in the venv ?10:10
quiquellGoing to check again10:10
*** ssbarnea has joined #oooq10:12
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci- (3 more messages)10:38
pandabogdando: does 603069 work for you ? I'm not sure the command module can handle the nested quotes10:38
quiquellpanda: Confirmed with my repro that https://review.openstack.org/#/c/612290/ is not needed10:39
quiquellpanda: Maybe I followed a red herring10:39
quiquellpanda: thanks mate one less to have f28 working10:39
quiquellpanda: I delete the task or do you want to park it or something ?10:40
pandaquiquell: mark as done, adda comment saying the review is not necessary10:41
pandaquiquell: I always like to leave track of things that we didn't do. Deleting things just removes pieces of our history10:41
quiquellpanda: Yep agree with that10:42
pandabogdando: also, where do we use the getthelogs script ?10:43
*** dtantsur|afk is now known as dtantsur10:48
*** ssbarnea has quit IRC10:49
ssbarnea|bkp2is friday so I am trying to cleanup few old CRs I have, so if some can help with it would be great10:55
ssbarnea|bkp2panda bogdando : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/570546/ -- with mention that I don't care about py3 for this tasks ATM.10:56
ssbarnea|bkp2panda chandankumar arxcruz : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/613250/ - two lines, no risk. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/613250/10:58
pandassbarnea|bkp2: where do we still use devstack-gate ?10:59
ssbarnea|bkp2panda tbh, I do not remember when/where I encountered it, but clearly I did as I would have not raised it otherwise.11:00
pandassbarnea|bkp2: we are not using devstack-gate anywher anymore.11:02
pandawell, not true11:02
pandathe rdoinfo jobs still use the old workflow11:02
pandabut they should11:03
*** huynq has quit IRC11:05
pandaanyway, we have no +2 power in devstack-gate, and I don't really understand the change.11:07
*** chem has quit IRC11:12
ssbarnea|bkp2panda: is very simple: if the venv already exists but does not have zuul inside code would fail to install it and go on. The test is incorrent, existence of one does not assume the other.11:12
ssbarnea|bkp2anyway, is not important.11:13
*** holser_ has joined #oooq11:23
ssbarnea|bkp2i am curious if I am too picky about https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1642399 (rh only)11:26
openstackssbarnea|bkp2: Error: Error getting bugzilla.redhat.com bug #1642399: NotPermitted11:26
*** udesale has quit IRC11:28
*** panda is now known as panda|lunch11:29
chandankumarpanda|lunch: weshay please have a look at this user stroy 2nd comment https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/us/193?milestone=203564 what do you think?11:31
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2, panda|lunch: I have squash all the changes we have for the f28 and run a hacked reproducer and it's failing at standalone deploy11:44
quiquellbut I think it's just related to my reproducer :-)11:45
quiquellso we are near to have something \o/11:45
chandankumarpanda|lunch: weshay kopecmartin arxcruz need feedback on this https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/issue/289?kanban-status=202773311:52
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away11:58
weshaychandankumar, this bug has not been triaged, nor has it been prioritized afaict https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=164304612:00
openstackbugzilla.redhat.com bug 1643046 in openstack-tempest "missing microversion in transfer and backup related test http responses" [Unspecified,New] - Assigned to chkumar12:00
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC12:02
*** ratailor has quit IRC12:04
quiquellweshay: Do  you know what the br-ex is ?12:05
quiquellweshay: And if we are suppose to have it at RDO ?12:05
weshayquiquell, which part of rdo?12:05
weshayci.centos12:05
weshayor rdo-cloud12:05
weshaynodepool12:05
quiquellweshay: reproducer reproducing at my RDO tenant12:05
quiquellweshay: so rdo-cloud12:06
weshayquiquell, it can be eth1 or br-ex for the reproducer eth1 would be eaiser12:06
quiquellweshay: trying to run standalone there12:06
weshayquiquell, no..12:06
weshaynot rdo-cloud12:06
weshayquiquell, libvirt repro12:06
weshaynot ovb12:06
weshayquiquell, you are running it in rdo-cloud?12:06
quiquellweshay: ok standalone_interface: eth1 should work ?12:07
quiquellweshay: yep, libvirt always failing somwhere12:07
quiquellweshay: hacked a rdo one to run f28 + ci workflow + standalone12:07
weshayquiquell, do you have all your deps installed?12:07
quiquellweshay: yep12:07
weshayhrm.. k12:07
quiquellweshay: just failing at standalone deploy for the br-ex12:07
weshayok.. quiquell we'll look at that next sprint I guess12:07
weshayquiquell, ya.. you need a second interface12:07
quiquellweshay: Was just a tool to find stuff and not wait for zuul12:07
weshaybr-ex is a native linux bridge12:08
quiquellweshay: It's not producion wise12:08
weshayquiquell, are you familiar w/ linux bridges?12:08
quiquellweshay: will use eth112:08
quiquellweshay: yep12:08
*** panda|lunch is now known as panda12:24
pandassbarnea|bkp2: can you point me to you os detection code ?12:27
ssbarnea|bkp2panda: tq -> quickstart.sh12:27
ssbarnea|bkp2panda initially developer inside https://github.com/ssbarnea/me/blob/master/distros.yml -- in order to ease testing it.12:28
pandassbarnea|bkp2: it's already merged ?12:31
ssbarnea|bkp2panda yes12:31
pandammmhhh12:32
*** rf0lc0 has joined #oooq12:33
pandassbarnea|bkp2: in quickstart.sh ?12:33
pandassbarnea|bkp2: I don't see it ...12:33
*** rf0lc0 is now known as rfolco|rover12:33
ssbarnea|bkp2panda: ahh,.. i must have being dreaming about that part. still in the queue: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/612677/12:35
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: yep queue is huge12:36
quiquell:-(12:36
*** rlandy has joined #oooq12:36
quiquellno promotion -> timeouts -> long queues12:36
ssbarnea|bkp2and this is not the only problem,... it often fails.12:36
quiquellAt least is raining here so I am happy12:36
*** quiquell is now known as quiquell|lunch12:37
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb- (2 more messages)12:38
pandaquiquell|lunch: if you get too happy, please tell me and I will come to slap you.12:40
chandankumarquiquell|lunch: take a cup of tea with some pakoras and enjoy the rain :-)12:40
*** agopi|brb is now known as agopi12:41
*** chem has joined #oooq12:41
rlandyweshay: can I cancel this request: https://projects.engineering.redhat.com/browse/CENTRALCI-2417?12:45
rlandythis was almost a year ago12:45
rlandythey hadn't filled it in 9 months, I forgot about it12:46
* tosky sighs12:46
toskydownstream12:46
weshayrlandy, aye12:48
quiquell|lunchssbarnea|bkp2: I have pass os-net-config at my repro run for f28 and new workflow12:52
quiquell|lunchssbarnea|bkp2: Doing puppet stuff now12:52
quiquell|lunchssbarnea|bkp2: It has all the changes we have12:53
ssbarnea|bkp2quiquell|lunch : sounds promising.12:53
arxcruzmarios: another meeting in the wall ?12:59
rlandypanda: meeting13:01
arxcruzpanda: https://redhat.bluejeans.com/7661925373/13:01
quiquell|lunchssbarnea|bkp2, weshay: Deploy success with rdo + reproducer + new workflow + f28 + standalone13:02
quiquell|lunchwe have the needed reviews to make it work13:02
weshayquiquell|lunch, which hash are you using?13:02
quiquell|lunchweshay: Changed to 'current' to be able to use hte latest openstackclient RPM13:03
quiquell|lunchweshay: for containers is tripleo-current13:03
weshayah cool13:03
weshayquiquell|lunch, which repo is that rpm built from?13:03
*** quiquell|lunch is now known as quiquell13:03
quiquellthe distgit13:04
weshayquiquell, not the rpm you knucklehead13:04
weshayquiquell, the src for openstackclient13:04
quiquellweshay: give me a min13:04
weshayk k13:05
weshayrfolco|rover, ok.. we should sync13:05
quiquellweshay: 200~[zuul@subnode-0 ~]$ rpm -qa |grep openstackclient13:05
quiquellpython3-openstackclient-3.16.1-0.20181026111454.3e5a2d2.fc28.noarch13:05
rfolco|roverweshay, bj?13:05
weshayhttps://github.com/openstack/openstackclient  quiquell13:05
weshayrfolco|rover, ya13:06
weshayhttps://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/openstackclient13:06
weshayquiquell, sorry.. I've just never poked at the src for openstackclient13:07
weshaywanted to see who and what was going on there13:07
weshaynot a busy repo13:07
quiquellweshay: sure give me a sec to find inside13:07
weshayquiquell, I just posted it13:07
quiquellweshay: commit id 3e5a2d227c813937ad7ea23d334f7d23c1f8a2cc from that repo13:08
chandankumarweshay: arxcruz friday is a good day jaint patch is going to land https://review.openstack.org/59142413:20
arxcruzchandankumar: i still think this should not be done right now... but...13:21
*** ratailor has joined #oooq13:24
*** irclogbot_0 has joined #oooq13:31
chandankumarsee ya, have a nice weekend13:33
*** chandankumar is now known as chkumar|off13:33
*** ratailor has quit IRC13:35
*** agopi is now known as agopi|brb13:35
*** agopi|brb has quit IRC13:40
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch13:44
weshaypanda, rfolco|rover need a few13:59
rfolco|roverack13:59
pandaweshay: rfolco|rover mee too14:02
rfolco|roverack14:02
*** agopi|brb has joined #oooq14:05
*** agopi|brb is now known as agopi14:05
rlandymarios: quiquell: if we get stuck on the zuul vars to get at playbooks - any thoughts on parsing the logs for the list of playbooks?14:10
rlandynot ideal14:10
rlandybut workable14:10
quiquellrlandy: I would prefer ara stuff14:10
quiquellrlandy: But we have the task not the plabooks in the jsons14:11
rlandyquiquell: yeah - last resort14:11
quiquellrlandy: We can even read the sqlite we ahve14:11
mariosrlandy: yeah i'll be exploring that too14:11
mariosquiquell: or ara14:11
quiquellrlandy, marios: better ara is formatted data logs can change with ansible versions14:11
mariosquiquell: rlandy its already here http://logs.openstack.org/68/604768/6/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container/12f8acd/ara-report/14:12
rlandymarios: quiquell: ok - we have options14:12
rlandyyeah - as long as we don;t get stuck on zuul var we can't access14:12
* rlandy keep quiet now14:12
quiquellrlandy, marios: Puff zuul QUEUED stuff is killing me, we can not even run a 1 min proto there14:13
quiquellmarios: runnig proto https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/stream/982c15605dba46e3bd0ebc5b57ab2ce3?logfile=console.log14:14
quiquellweshay, rlandy, panda: Let's merge the release file for f28 https://review.openstack.org/#/c/610468/14:15
weshayrfolco|rover, panda k.. ready14:16
rlandyquiquell: looks ok14:17
weshayquiquell, just fyi14:17
weshayquiquell, if we continue to use current14:17
weshayshit will break immediately w/o warning14:17
weshayquiquell, pin to the hash that worked for you on line 5514:18
weshayhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/610468/37/config/release/tripleo-ci/Fedora-28/master.yml14:18
weshayquiquell, understood?14:18
weshaythan I'll merge14:18
quiquellweshay: Agree14:18
quiquellweshay: and change to current when we have a promotion14:18
quiquellweshay: Ohh wait, we can manually tag with DLRN commands ?14:18
quiquellweshay: So we point the release file to tripleo-current ?14:19
weshayssbarnea|bkp2, ^ help quiquell please14:20
weshaypanda, ??14:20
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej14:20
*** jaganathan has quit IRC14:23
quiquellpanda, ssbarnea|bkp2: The hash is 1e506094949d68b452d044941c0d6f85ef997b9e_c7bc20cd14:25
*** tosky has quit IRC14:25
quiquell humm we are using consistent14:26
quiquellfor tripleo dlrn14:26
ssbarnea|bkp2me getting bit (more) confused, i only remember that weshay have me a hash to inject in one change, yesterday. was this the same or another one....14:26
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: Give a sec I will force it14:27
*** tosky has joined #oooq14:29
bogdandopanda: yes 603069 wfm14:31
bogdandopanda: I have no idea if there is users of the getthelogs script but me14:32
*** vinaykns has joined #oooq14:33
bogdandojust found it exists and made it working for me better :)14:33
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb- (3 more messages)14:38
quiquellweshay: marked https://review.openstack.org/61046814:40
quiquellrlandy, panda: Can you vote again ?14:41
quiquellhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/610468/14:41
*** quiquell is now known as quiquell|off14:42
rlandydone14:49
*** ssbarnea|bkp2 has quit IRC14:51
*** saneax has quit IRC14:51
*** ssbarnea has joined #oooq15:00
mariosrlandy: panda merge theses please https://review.openstack.org/#/c/613598/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/613597/ needed for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/60970815:16
rlandylooking15:17
rlandyweshay: ^^ your thoughts on ditching the 3-node job?15:20
rlandywe have gone through this before15:20
rlandyslagle's job?15:20
mariosrlandy: its a done thing15:21
mariosrlandy: i mean master/rocky already merged15:21
rlandyok then15:21
mariosrlandy: and also for tq https://review.openstack.org/#/c/609710/15:21
mariosrlandy: so i was also trying to remove the job definition too, since we no longer call it anywhere at least on master but it failed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/609708/ because ocata/pike still have it, hence those cherrypicks15:22
mariosthanks15:22
rlandymarios: I approved calling the reviews that call the job15:23
rlandydo we have no plan to revive it at all?15:23
mariosrlandy: not that i'm aware15:23
rlandyie; remove the definition and be done?15:23
rlandyI know I am being pedantic about this15:23
mariosrlandy: maybe for 'edge' where we have one node overcloud but who nodes15:24
rlandybut I went down this road a while back15:24
* rlandy explains15:24
mariosrlandy: if you think we shouldn't then -1 the g/#/c/609708/  and write there?15:24
mariosrlandy: so we can ask others to look too15:24
mariosrlandy: but those cherypick we probably want regardless if we are no longer running that job on master/rocky/queens15:25
rlandymarios: left some notes  in pvt15:25
rlandyif slagle approves, I'm fine with it15:25
rlandyit was his job to start15:26
*** apetrich has quit IRC15:44
*** zul has quit IRC15:52
*** agopi is now known as agopi|food15:52
rlandypanda: would you like to be QE on either of the toci_gate_test ot toci_quickstart  variables tasks?15:55
rlandyhttps://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/task/27115:56
rlandyI am filling out details there now as I work on it15:56
rlandymarios: ^^ fyi15:56
mariosrlandy: i could also do that if needed fyi15:56
mariosi mean qe15:56
rlandysure  - if panda says no15:56
rlandynota  big deal - just asking as I work on the card15:56
mariosyes never say no to panda15:56
marioshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X21mJh6j9i415:57
* marios runs15:57
rlandylol15:58
*** apetrich has joined #oooq15:58
rlandymarios; that's hysterical15:58
rlandyour new team theme15:59
*** bogdando has quit IRC16:07
*** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk16:07
*** dsneddon has quit IRC16:07
*** holser_ has quit IRC16:08
*** holser_ has joined #oooq16:08
*** holser_ has quit IRC16:12
*** kopecmartin is now known as kopecmartin|off16:13
weshayrfolco|rover, panda for example "[openstack-dev] [tripleo] retirement of instack-undercloud"16:20
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001 @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb- (3 more messages)16:38
*** agopi|food is now known as agopi16:38
*** trown is now known as trown|lunch16:43
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off17:20
ssbarneawow... it did merge.17:22
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq17:25
*** ykarel|away has joined #oooq17:34
*** trown|lunch is now known as trown17:50
rascasoftssbarnea, me crosses fingers :D18:06
rascasoftlast time it was the apocalypse18:07
weshayrfolco|rover, panda https://review.rdoproject.org/grafana/dashboard/db/tripleo-ci?orgId=118:12
*** dsneddon has quit IRC18:32
*** apetrich has quit IRC18:34
*** apetrich has joined #oooq18:35
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset053, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7 (4 more messages)18:38
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq18:42
weshayrfolco|rover, any updates on https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/17102/19:47
rfolco|roverweshay, testing now19:48
rfolco|roverweshay, btw tmate is still open... do not close pls19:49
rlandypanda: still around?19:54
rlandypanda: any reason we don;t collect files in tripleo_root?19:55
weshayrlandy, what is in tripleo_root?20:08
rlandyweshay: https://github.com/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/blob/master/playbooks/tripleo-ci/run-v3.yaml#L7320:08
rlandyweshay: we render the .j2 templates from jobs there20:09
rlandyfor the reproducer,20:09
rlandywe could recreate all those file20:09
rlandyor just pick them up with the RIGHT vars in place20:09
rlandyif we saved them out in logs20:09
rlandyweshay: I made this change to see ... https://review.openstack.org/61367820:10
weshayrlandy, oh.. collect them for the reproducer to consume them20:10
rlandybut the logs list is overridden in so many p;aces, not sure I have th right one20:10
rlandyweshay: yeah20:10
weshayinteresting20:10
rlandyrun-v3 actually creates them20:10
rlandywith a ton of vars20:10
weshayrlandy, I wonder if some of the values need to change based on where it's running20:10
rlandyweshay: that is what I am trying to compare20:11
rlandywe may get lucky20:11
rlandyor have to sed out a couple vars20:11
weshayrfolco|rover, I need you and sshnaidm|off to focus on ovb jobs across all brances as soon as you clear up20:12
rlandyI should probably make a change in rdocloud settings20:12
weshayrfolco|rover, afaict rdo-cloud is back on it's feet20:12
rlandythat one will run sooner20:12
rfolco|roverweshay, ack20:12
weshayrfolco|rover, rlandy fyi https://review.openstack.org/#/c/613575/520:14
weshayhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/613640/20:14
rlandylooks ok20:17
rlandy29hr queue20:19
rlandythat's a first20:19
rlandyweshay: do you know where the artcl_collect_list: for rdocloud CI is kept?20:23
rlandyI think it's different20:23
weshayrlandy, I think it's default for the role20:23
weshayin collect_logs/defaults/main20:23
rlandyhttps://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/blob/master/roles/collect-logs/defaults/main.yml#L420:24
* rlandy tries20:24
rlandyI edited https://github.com/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/blob/master/toci-quickstart/config/collect-logs.yml20:24
rlandyI think that changes upstream20:25
* rlandy forgets what uses what20:25
weshayrfolco|rover, while you are at it..20:30
weshay<kforde> I spent a few hours this morning trying to get a grip on the ovb job failure20:30
weshay<weshay> kforde so I think y20:30
weshayoops20:30
weshayrfolco|rover, can you add something to roll this dir http://38.145.33.166/console-logs/20:30
rfolco|roverweshay, ok20:30
rfolco|roverweshay, holy sh*t that dir has millions of files20:32
rfolco|rover8746820:32
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC20:34
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset053, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7 (4 more messages)20:38
rfolco|roverweshay, where those files come from (under tebroker/console-logs)20:41
*** openstackstatus has quit IRC20:42
*** openstack has joined #oooq20:43
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o openstack20:43
weshayrfolco|rover, go to tmate20:45
weshayrfolco|rover, any blockers ping me20:46
rfolco|roverweshay, I see a bunch of bmc and baremetal logs... so I assume I can rotate those daily and compress one more time20:46
weshayrfolco|rover, let's do it weekly20:46
weshayon the dir20:47
weshaylike every saturday20:47
rfolco|roverk20:47
weshayrfolco|rover, thanks.. panda fyi ^20:47
rfolco|rovernow requirements started to appear20:47
rfolco|rovercustomer never tells you that first time20:47
rfolco|rover:)20:48
weshayfirst one is always free :)20:49
chkumar|offweshay: panda left some comment on LT slides20:51
chkumar|offweshay: can we add tempest docs needs attension on customer portal which is kind of lagging behind20:53
chkumar|offas a known challeges20:53
chkumar|offwhere RHOS-13 tempest docs never got updated20:54
chkumar|offweshay: last one, need calloboration of different dfg to add more tempest tests to tempest plugin instead of adding of adding it to polarian -> is kind of challange also20:56
weshaychkumar|off, ya.. so I think we can push on that while we push on dfg's to get a standalone in their project20:56
weshaychkumar|off, we're not there yet20:57
weshaychkumar|off, we need to stablize the standalone deployment and it's testing20:58
weshayand doc20:58
chkumar|offweshay: but I looked at polarian they mapped data from test failures to polarain using reportal portal20:59
chkumar|offweshay: https://rhos-qe-jenkins.rhev-ci-vms.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/job/DFG-opendaylight-odl-netvirt-13_director-rhel-virthost-3cont_2comp-ipv4-vxlan-ha-tempest-l2gw/65/artifact/.sh/ir-reportportal.log/20:59
chkumar|offweshay: http://reportportal.io/21:00
chkumar|offweshay: I will provide some more data on monday21:00
weshaychkumar|off, hey man21:00
weshaywe're talking about two different things21:00
chkumar|offweshay: np, we can talk on monday21:01
weshaychkumar|off, you are a little out in left field21:01
chkumar|offweshay: feel free to check out this https://github.com/rhos-infra/reportportal it might be useful for us21:01
weshaychkumar|off, you are prposing upstream infra sets up reportportal?21:02
*** trown is now known as trown|outtypewww21:03
chkumar|offweshay: np, we have two projects, logreduce and reportportal home grown, we might merge together to get some useful data related to test matrix, I still need to evaluate21:04
chkumar|offweshay: I am not proposing I got these stuff through email so sharing21:04
weshaychkumar|off, k.. let's chat for 15 min monday21:05
chkumar|offweshay: sure21:05
* chkumar|off hides back21:06
*** jbadiapa has quit IRC21:34
*** rlandy has quit IRC21:41
*** holser_ has joined #oooq22:33
*** holser_ has quit IRC22:37
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset053, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-fedora-28-standalone @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001, tripleo-ci-centos-7 (4 more messages)22:38
*** agopi has quit IRC23:02
*** holser_ has joined #oooq23:21
*** holser_ has quit IRC23:26

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!