Wednesday, 2018-10-03

*** agopi|off has joined #oooq00:21
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-master, legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset035-master, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario009-multinode-oooq, legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7 (2 more messages)00:51
*** hamzy has joined #oooq01:12
*** jbadiapa has quit IRC01:56
*** jbadiapa has joined #oooq01:58
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-master, legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset035-master, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024-pike @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci- (2 more messages)02:51
*** jaganathan has joined #oooq03:20
*** ykarel has joined #oooq03:47
chandankumarweshay: I was not on IRC yesterday04:17
*** gkadam has joined #oooq04:32
*** gkadam has quit IRC04:32
*** jaganathan has quit IRC04:44
*** ykarel_ has joined #oooq04:45
*** chandankumar has quit IRC04:46
*** chandankumar has joined #oooq04:47
*** ykarel has quit IRC04:48
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024-pike @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario009-multinode-oooq, legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb- (2 more messages)04:51
*** jaganathan has joined #oooq05:10
*** ykarel_ is now known as ykarel05:13
*** jfrancoa has joined #oooq05:31
*** udesale has joined #oooq05:41
*** ratailor has joined #oooq05:43
*** quiquell|off is now known as quiquell05:53
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|afk05:57
quiquellssbarnea: going to update the config/release task with the review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/606943/06:23
*** ykarel_ has joined #oooq06:27
*** ykarel|afk has quit IRC06:29
*** saneax has quit IRC06:30
*** holser_ has joined #oooq06:35
*** holser_ has quit IRC06:39
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024-pike @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-3nodes-multinode, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario009-multinode- (2 more messages)06:51
*** tosky has joined #oooq07:03
*** ykarel__ has joined #oooq07:13
*** holser_ has joined #oooq07:15
*** ykarel_ has quit IRC07:15
*** bogdando has joined #oooq07:16
*** jaganathan has quit IRC07:19
*** Tengu has quit IRC07:19
*** dmellado has quit IRC07:19
*** ajo has quit IRC07:19
*** ykarel__ is now known as ykarel07:20
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej07:27
*** Tengu has joined #oooq07:32
*** dmellado has joined #oooq07:32
*** ajo has joined #oooq07:32
*** skramaja has joined #oooq07:35
sshnaidmpanda, can you review/merge please? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/60716507:42
*** ykarel has quit IRC07:43
*** gkadam has joined #oooq07:44
*** ykarel has joined #oooq07:45
ssbarnea|bkp2quiquell: i replied to your comment, please no other changes than copy files, not on this one.07:57
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: We are nog going to rmeove ocata ?07:58
ssbarnea|bkp2quiquell: we may but is outside the scope of the change, is unrelated.07:58
ssbarnea|bkp2quiquell: this change is only for putting config files into distro-specific folders, not about touching them.07:59
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: ack, will remove my -108:00
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: Cannot stand duplicity :-/08:00
ssbarnea|bkp2quiquell: now lets go to the 2nd change, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/605843/08:02
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: This one makes more sense, we can reuse the ansible mechanism in the odl workflow08:03
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: To remove the homebrew if statement08:03
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: Let me know what you think08:03
*** ykarel_ has joined #oooq08:07
*** ykarel_ has quit IRC08:07
ssbarnea|bkp2quiquell added comment, I think both changes should get +W ASAP so we can move on.08:08
*** ykarel_ has joined #oooq08:09
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: this is the file that you can use as jinja https://github.com/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/blob/master/playbooks/tripleo-ci/run.yaml#L5308:09
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: But ack, on speed things up08:09
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: ok removed -108:10
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: But don't like08:10
ssbarnea|bkp2quiquell: f28 set of changes is huge and the faster we start merging them the faster we will be able to deliver it. I will do refactoring after, but I would prefer to avoid doing it on code that is supposed to be removed soon.08:11
quiquellssbarnea|bkp2: agree08:12
*** ykarel has quit IRC08:13
*** Tengu has quit IRC08:13
*** dmellado has quit IRC08:13
*** ajo has quit IRC08:13
sshnaidmquiquell, hey08:20
sshnaidmquiquell, have 10 min for ara talk?08:20
*** jtomasek_ has joined #oooq08:21
quiquellsshnaidm: sure thing, give me a minute08:22
*** jtomasek has quit IRC08:23
quiquellsshnaidm: ready08:24
sshnaidmquiquell, https://bluejeans.com/u/sshnaidm/08:25
*** Tengu has joined #oooq08:27
*** dmellado has joined #oooq08:27
*** ajo has joined #oooq08:27
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq08:34
*** jtomasek_ has quit IRC08:36
*** holser_ has quit IRC08:37
*** holser_ has joined #oooq08:42
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024-pike @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-3nodes-multinode, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario009-multinode- (2 more messages)08:51
*** Tengu has quit IRC08:51
*** dmellado has quit IRC08:51
*** ajo has quit IRC08:51
*** ykarel_ is now known as ykarel|lunch08:55
*** saneax has joined #oooq08:58
*** jtomasek has quit IRC08:59
*** Tengu has joined #oooq09:05
*** dmellado has joined #oooq09:05
*** ajo has joined #oooq09:05
quiquellsshnaidm: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/16729/09:08
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq09:15
quiquellpanda, sshnaidm: Force run the new promotion jobs can screw promotions, like changing DLRN state and such09:20
pandaquiquell: yes, usually stating pipeline manually is bad, you should block any other automatic runs09:23
quiquellpanda: Do you have a minute for bj ? I found the 'issue' with release file for periodics, but I think is not an issue is a feature09:24
quiquellpanda: And I suspect testing it at check is not a good thing09:24
quiquellpanda: nah forget about it, we are not going to be able to test it, until it runs at periodic pipeline09:27
pandayep, periodic jobs ar tough09:27
quiquellpanda: We have a guard in the new workflow the run only at periodic pipelines that's feature09:28
quiquellpanda: Going to test with normal jobs09:28
quiquellpanda: But we are not going to be able to test periodics, with their release file09:28
quiquellpanda: Are we ok with that ?09:28
quiquellpanda: nah I need bj times with you about periodics, because we have two solutions in place09:37
quiquellpanda: we have to decide09:37
quiquellsshnaidm: Do you remember were do we state the job status to DLRN ?09:40
sshnaidmquiquell, https://github.com/rdo-infra/review.rdoproject.org-config/blob/master/playbooks/legacy-tripleo-ci-periodic-base/post.yaml#L1209:42
sshnaidmquiquell, btw, we can run periodic job in patch if you want to check something09:42
quiquellsshnaidm: thanks09:42
sshnaidmquiquell, what is the problem with them?09:43
quiquellsshnaidm: I am testing the new periodics working at new workflow09:43
quiquellsshnaidm: I found that they were using wrong release file, but that's because we check zuul.pipeline name to know if we are periodics09:44
quiquellsshnaidm: But we also have the periodic flag explicit at jobs in RDO, so I don't know if we want to rmeove the pipeline check09:44
quiquellsshnaidm: pipeline check if overriden exicit periodic var also09:45
sshnaidmexplicit var looks much better09:45
quiquellsshnaidm: But it opens the door to run periodic jobs at check pipeline and that's no good09:45
sshnaidmquiquell, why not?09:46
quiquellsshnaidm: It will break promotions, isn't it ?09:46
quiquellsshnaidm: They will report to DLRN or upload stuff09:46
sshnaidmquiquell, for that you need to run the whole set of all periodic jobs for specific repo hash09:46
sshnaidmquiquell, maybe we can make something to protect it09:47
quiquellsshnaidm: so you are good with this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/607183/ ?09:47
sshnaidmquiquell, but running periodic job in patch seems great option to me, we can test things without breaking promotion and waiting a lot09:47
quiquellsshnaidm: and then check the pipeline at DLRN reporting and upload stuff ?09:48
sshnaidmquiquell, maybe uploading and reporting only should depend on zuul.pipeline09:48
quiquellsshnaidm: Yep that's what I mean09:48
quiquellsshnaidm: will try to add that, thanks09:48
quiquellpanda: ^09:48
pandaquiquell: bj ?09:49
quiquellpanda: sure09:49
pandaquiquell: my bj ?09:50
quiquellpanda: issues with mic09:50
quiquellpanda: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/16624/09:52
quiquellpanda: https://github.com/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/blob/master/playbooks/tripleo-ci/vars/common.yaml#L1409:54
*** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel10:05
kopecmartin|ruckhi marios|rover10:08
kopecmartin|ruckmarios|rover, does this mean that phase1 for rocky passed? https://ci.centos.org/view/rdo/view/promotion-pipeline/job/rdo_trunk-promote-rocky-current-tripleo/29/10:09
quiquellpanda: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/16370/46/zuul.d/base.yaml10:09
*** dtrainor has quit IRC10:14
*** gkadam has quit IRC10:24
*** udesale has quit IRC10:26
*** jtomasek has quit IRC10:28
marios|roverkopecmartin|ruck: looks like. at least rocky is one of the only green ones in http://cistatus.tripleo.org/phase1/10:35
marios|roverkopecmartin|ruck: oh actually that one is from the 26th of september (in tripleo-quickstart-promote-rocky-rdo_trunk-minimal10:35
kopecmartin|ruckmarios|rover, so it means, our status present on the program call in 1.5 hour is green?10:35
marios|roverkopecmartin|ruck: it means we've had a rocky promotion :) but yeah generally our status is green (at least today it is, looks like master/rocky promoting and our ci status is pretty good upstream gates are green )10:37
kopecmartin|ruckmarios|rover, then i don't know, why the dashboard is still red? maybe it's just slow and it hasn't been updated yet? http://rhos-release.virt.bos.redhat.com:3030/rhosp10:38
marios|roverkopecmartin|ruck: don't know either10:39
ykarelmarios|rover, kopecmartin|ruck phase1 master promotion is going on, see bottom of http://38.145.34.55/master.log10:40
ykarel2018-10-03 09:50:59,692 20273 INFO     promoter Promoting the container images for dlrn hash 965941f1e62cef16967e7a7cd6d98263e52acb62 on master to current-tripleo-rdo10:40
marios|roverykarel: thanks10:40
ykarelnext would be rocky phase 110:41
ykarelthe blocker for rocky/master phase1 merged today10:41
ykarelso i reran both today morning10:41
ykarelhttps://ci.centos.org/view/rdo/view/promotion-pipeline/10:41
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-3nodes-multinode, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario009-multinode-oooq, legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-master, tripleo-quickstart-extras-gate-master-delorean-full- (1 more message)10:51
chandankumarpanda: Hello10:57
chandankumarpanda: I need some help on creating EPIC in Taiga10:57
chandankumarpanda: I was working on podman support in tQE role and I am not sure how can I track that10:57
chandankumarpanda: there are the reviews https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:tempest_podman+(status:open+OR+status:merged)10:58
chandankumarpanda: another is running full tempest on standalone https://review.openstack.org/60604610:59
pandachandankumar: a sec11:02
pandachandankumar: ok sorry I was in meeting, reading back11:13
pandachandankumar:  so you were adding podman support related to tempest11:13
chandankumarpanda: yes11:14
pandachandankumar: ok, let's make it as genreal as possible11:14
pandachandankumar: I think we'll all have to deal with podman at a certain point11:14
pandachandankumar: we can create an epic to add podman in CI workflow11:15
pandachandankumar: then a user story can be to delawith podamn in tempest11:15
pandadeal11:15
chandankumarpanda: yup11:15
pandachandankumar: seems reasonable?11:15
chandankumarpanda: yes it seems reasonable11:15
pandathere are no more squads, we can share epic with tempest11:15
pandawe can bled with you guys11:16
pandawe are not different anymore :)11:16
pandalet's not be topic-racist and love each other11:16
chandankumarpanda: :-)11:16
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq11:18
pandachandankumar: https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/epic/10111:20
pandachandankumar: https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/us/10211:20
pandayou can add as tasks the variour parts11:21
pandachandankumar: are you working on it right now ?11:22
pandachandankumar: you have a lot of tasks in progress11:22
chandankumarpanda: thanks :-)11:31
*** dtrainor has joined #oooq11:33
chandankumarpanda: Can we add multiple reviews to a single task?11:35
chandankumarpanda: like this https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/task/10311:35
*** quiquell is now known as quiquell|lunch11:37
*** ratailor has quit IRC11:37
pandachandankumar: the number of reviews does not count, the basic idea of a task is "something that can be completed by a single person a a short (2/3 days) amount of time". The "completed" word here is probably the most difficult to interpret. TO me a completed review is when you have the +W11:38
pandaand the 2/3 should be consecutive ..11:40
chandankumarpanda: got it11:41
ssbarneapanda: is there a way to get permalinks to images on https://nb01.openstack.org/images/ ?11:44
ssbarneai see that images are keep changing and obviously breaking the code11:44
ssbarneai just want to point to an f28 image, regardless its "minor numbering"11:45
weshaykopecmartin|ruck, marios|rover sweet, we're promoting rocky rdo p1 right now11:47
weshayhttp://38.145.34.55/rocky.log11:48
weshaychanging status to green11:48
sshnaidmkopecmartin|ruck, marios|rover hi, did you see java errors in libvirt jobs? https://ci.centos.org/job/tripleo-quickstart-extras-gate-ocata-delorean-quick-basic/857/console  https://ci.centos.org/job/tripleo-quickstart-extras-gate-master-delorean-quick-basic/857/consoleFull11:48
sshnaidmkopecmartin|ruck, marios|rover I see those jobs are finished with timeout, is there known issue?11:49
*** agopi|off is now known as agopi11:50
weshaykopecmartin|ruck, any questions?11:53
pandasshnaidm: not that I know of, we are effectively working around the build system to get the images we need. Probably the code should be changed to be smarter11:53
pandassbarnea: not sshnaidm ^11:53
kopecmartin|ruckweshay, i just don't get why the dashboard hasn't changed to green as soon as this passed https://ci.centos.org/view/rdo/view/promotion-pipeline/job/rdo_trunk-promote-rocky-current-tripleo/29/11:53
marios|roversshnaidm: no current issue (status at https://review.rdoproject.org/etherpad/p/ruckrover-sprint20 updated this morning).. i did see one timeout in gate earlier http://dashboard-ci.tripleo.org/d/cEEjGFFmz/cockpit?orgId=1 and still one just checked (tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario002-multinode-oooq-container )11:53
weshaykopecmartin|ruck, http://38.145.34.55/rocky.log11:53
marios|roversshnaidm: thanks for heads up will keep an eye11:54
weshaykopecmartin|ruck, we're still uploading the baremetal images, and containers to docker.io11:54
sshnaidmmarios|rover, it happens only in libvirt jobs, maybe weshay knows ^11:54
pandassbarnea: the code should fetch the latest image available there, and probably also check multiple build hosts11:54
weshaykopecmartin|ruck, once that is done, the dlrn repo link will be updated, and the board will update11:54
weshaykopecmartin|ruck, it can take 1hr to upload all those containers though11:54
ssbarneapanda: who puts the images there? i may ask them for a solution, better than me trying to do heuristics to detect last image available.11:55
weshaykopecmartin|ruck, https://hub.docker.com/r/tripleorocky/11:55
sshnaidmweshay, do you know maybe what's wrong with ci.centos with those java errors? https://ci.centos.org/job/tripleo-quickstart-extras-gate-ocata-delorean-quick-basic/857/console11:55
weshaysshnaidm, I'll look in a minute buddy11:56
sshnaidmweshay, sure, no rush11:56
kopecmartin|ruckweshay, where can i see that?11:56
kopecmartin|rucki meant the IP , where is the job which uploads the images?11:56
weshaykopecmartin|ruck, I just sent you the links11:56
kopecmartin|ruckweshay, great another page :/ .. and are we really green when phase2 is not?11:56
weshayhttp://38.145.34.55/rocky.log11:56
*** jtomasek has quit IRC11:57
weshaykopecmartin|ruck, phase2 is down for maint on some hardware.. so yes11:57
weshayit's only baremetal deployments anyway... it's a nice to have11:58
pandassbarnea: those are the intermediate build steps to get a image uploaded into glance with their canonical names. We are effectively stealing them in the process. You may want ask in #openstack-infra, but the "permanent" location for them is glance, so I'm not sure they'll want to put some modification there for us only.11:58
ssbarneapanda: are we forced to get them from this location or we could get them from glance too? sorry for so many questions, just trying to get a better understanding of the situation.12:00
weshaykopecmartin|ruck, you can see the same information on the ruck/rover cockpit page12:02
weshaykopecmartin|ruck, can you respond to my email please12:02
*** trown|outtypewww is now known as trown12:03
*** udesale has joined #oooq12:03
kopecmartin|ruckweshay, what email? o.O12:05
weshaykopecmartin|ruck, recheck http://rhos-release.virt.bos.redhat.com:3030/rhosp  http://38.145.34.55/rocky.log12:09
kopecmartin|ruckyes i know, the dashboard got updated, rocky phase1 is green12:11
kopecmartin|ruckweshay, ^12:11
marios|roverweshay: we have BZ (on the call now) ... wrt our triaged not started12:12
marios|roverweshay: sorry that should have been 'we have BZ????'12:13
weshaykopecmartin|ruck, resent12:15
kopecmartin|ruckweshay, I've got it know, i don't know why there is that big delay ... anyway, checking the bugs12:16
pandassbarnea: we don't have direct access to glance in infra12:18
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch12:18
pandassbarnea: the only thing that we see is the node offered by zuul12:18
kopecmartin|ruckweshay, I haven't created any bug, if that's what you are asking12:19
*** ssbarnea|bkp2 has quit IRC12:20
weshaykopecmartin|ruck, what can I do to help?12:23
*** quiquell|lunch is now known as quiquell12:24
quiquellpanda, weshay: I have to take 17th of this month as PTO12:24
weshayquiquell, k.. thanks.. please add it the rhos pto/travel cal12:25
quiquellweshay: ack12:25
pandaquiquell: -2 -2!12:25
quiquellpanda: :P12:27
*** rlandy has joined #oooq12:32
*** ykarel has quit IRC12:34
*** ykarel has joined #oooq12:37
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq12:39
rlandypanda: hello - when you have a moment, can you fill me in on where the rdo jobs migration is now?12:45
*** vinaykns has joined #oooq12:47
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-3nodes-multinode, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario009-multinode-oooq, tripleo-quickstart-extras-gate-master-delorean-full-featureset052 @ https://review.openstack.org/560445,  (1 more message)12:51
pandarlandy: in 30 minutes ok12:52
pandarlandy: ? I have 1-1 in 1012:52
rlandypanda: sure - thanks a ton for all the work you did there12:53
pandarlandy: the summary is: rdoinfo is "working" the workflow at least, but we need another revolutionizing change to make it work. We are moving forward the migration preparation together with quique12:54
weshaypanda, 1-112:54
weshayin 512:54
weshayor now12:54
weshayif you want12:54
pandarlandy: we need to discuss this other change for rdo-info12:54
pandaweshay: now is ok12:54
rlandyok - sure12:54
pandaweshay:  ... meeding id please ...12:55
panda:(12:56
weshayhttps://bluejeans.com/411356779812:56
marios|roverrf0lc0: so no scrum today? is it because of the other call in 2 mins ?12:59
rf0lc0marios|rover, I am just keeping the current meetings12:59
marios|roverrf0lc0: damn it i keep getting confused. ok so i was sure we used to have scrum on wednesday at some point but i guess not?13:01
rf0lc0I'd be happy to add a scrum if needed13:01
marios|roverrf0lc0: :) no thats fine i just thought it was mon-wed-thu13:01
rf0lc0marios|rover, you are right, no reason to skip it on wed13:01
sshnaidmrf0lc0, no, please, no more meetings ;(13:04
rf0lc0sshnaidm, marios|rover event says weekly mon,thu13:04
quiquellrf0lc0: Do we have a meeting ?13:05
*** udesale has quit IRC13:05
rf0lc0no, just saying that scrums are weekly mon,thu13:05
*** holser__ has joined #oooq13:06
*** holser_ has quit IRC13:07
sshnaidmrf0lc0, https://i.imgflip.com/2ja3et.jpg13:07
rf0lc0 lol13:07
quiquellrf0lc0: You trying to kill my pet ?13:08
rf0lc0hahaha13:08
* rf0lc0 points finger to marios|rover 13:09
rf0lc0he is the meeting lover13:09
sshnaidmis it legal?13:10
quiquellto kill meeting lovers, yes!13:10
* marios|rover hids13:12
*** ssbarnea|bkp2 has joined #oooq13:17
quiquellrf0lc0: Remove timeout logic merged :-)13:18
quiquellrf0lc0: after two months hehe13:18
weshayarxcruz, will be a little late to our 1-1, I have to catch up w/ kopecmartin|ruck13:18
rf0lc0quiquell, for the love of gods of ci and patron saint protector of merge conflicts, yes!!13:19
weshaysshnaidm, need your help reviewing https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/us/8?milestone=20355913:19
quiquellrf0lc0: Has take the liberty to do the honors and move the 'task' aka 'card'13:20
rf0lc0quiquell, thank you sir13:20
quiquellrf0lc0: with pleasure13:20
weshaykopecmartin|ruck, please join my blue13:21
pandarlandy: quiquell do you have time to sync ?13:22
arxcruzweshay: yes sir13:22
weshaykopecmartin|ruck, https://bluejeans.com/411356779813:22
pandaquiquell: rlandy like, NOW ?13:22
rlandysure13:22
pandaquiquell: rlandy my bj ?13:22
rlandysure13:22
quiquellpanda: ack13:22
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as aoralej13:32
*** Vorrtex has joined #oooq13:39
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away13:39
*** aoralej is now known as amoralej13:41
*** agopi has quit IRC13:42
*** ykarel_ has joined #oooq13:43
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC13:45
rookweshay: rlandy hey - so is no one maintaining : https://ci.centos.org/artifacts/rdo/images/ ?13:45
weshaynope13:46
rookany reason why?13:46
weshayhttps://images.rdoproject.org/master/13:46
rookok13:47
rookweshay: do we have the same thing downstream by chance?13:47
weshayrook, images are cached internally too13:47
weshayrascasoft, what's the url for that.. it's on rhos-release13:48
weshayserver13:48
weshayarxcruz, ready for 1-113:48
rookweshay: oh, i suppose i am curious if it is RHEL based13:48
rookvs centos13:48
rookmaybe it is.13:48
rascasoftweshay, rook, me find it out13:48
*** ssbarnea|bkp2 has quit IRC13:49
rascasoftweshay, rook, rhos-release.virt.bos.redhat.com:/var/www/html/ci-images/centos-org-image-cache13:50
rascasoftso I'd say13:50
rookjust a cache of the rdoproject link13:50
rascasofthttp://rhos-release.virt.bos.redhat.com/ci-images/centos-org-image-cache/13:50
*** tosky__ has joined #oooq13:51
*** tosky has quit IRC13:51
rascasoftrook, yes, basically when we run the internal pipelines we have 4 or 5 jobs that needs to get images13:51
*** tosky__ is now known as tosky13:52
rookok13:52
kopecmartin|ruckarxcruz, I'm sorry i took some of your private time on 1-113:52
rascasoftrook, as a first step we cache them in that path13:52
rascasoftrook, so all the jobs can point there13:52
rookack - i just wanted to know if we have a "ga" image or "latest_cdn" image13:52
rookto use13:52
rooki will try what I see out there now.13:52
rlandypanda: quiquell: https://github.com/rdo-infra/review.rdoproject.org-config/blob/master/zuul.d/tripleo.yaml#L54113:58
*** jschlueter has quit IRC13:59
*** jschlueter has joined #oooq14:00
arxcruzkopecmartin|ruck: you pay me abeer later ;)14:00
kopecmartin|ruckarxcruz, sure, if you'll be in Brno I'll buy you two of them ;) (or generally in czech republic, it's much more cheaper than in Denver for example :D)14:02
*** agopi has joined #oooq14:04
*** skramaja has quit IRC14:05
*** skramaja has joined #oooq14:05
pandaweshay: we set our path for rdo, rdoinfo is out, making the bulk switch and deal with the consequences is IN. if you want to chat I'm available for the next 2+ hours still14:05
weshayrlandy, quiquell sshnaidm everyone ok w/ that? ^^^^14:08
rlandyweshay: we just met and discussed this14:09
rlandyquiquell, and I are in agreement14:09
rlandyworking on merging the base task now14:09
sshnaidmweshay, I don't know what is that about14:09
quiquellweshay: yep, let's break this sh...14:10
quiquellrlandy, panda: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/16761/14:13
quiquellIn case you merge the stuff today, you can merget this too to break periodics14:13
rlandyquiquell: panda: pls review the split base jobs (move rdoinfo out) https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/16412 and https://review.rdoproject.org/r/1676214:15
pandarlandy: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/16762  moved to https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/task/110 we don't need to review it now. Pushed out of sprint14:17
rlandyok14:17
quiquellOk drop now, I will luck at world news about this blowing up14:17
*** quiquell is now known as quiquell|off14:17
rlandyweshay: I am the only one with +2 on config - can we get panda added to the core list?14:19
rlandypanda: weshay: ok if I merge https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/16412?14:20
*** chandankumar is now known as chkumar|pyconind14:21
rlandypanda: hitting the merge button ... got ok from jpena ... object now or forever hold ....14:24
pandarlandy: have you addressed rf0lc0 comments ?14:26
* rlandy checks14:26
rlandyrf0lc0: can you explain more ... re what happens on upgrade? https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/16412/20/zuul.d/tripleo-rdo-base.yaml14:28
pandarlandy: also, we should remove rdoinfo base, not only the playbook14:28
rf0lc0rlandy, panda discussing this with nicolas on #sf-ops14:29
rf0lc0we'll have a problem now that we reparent to upstream base jobs14:29
rf0lc0coz previously paul created a base-minimal14:29
rf0lc0now multinode will parent to base, so need to define it in sf14:30
pandaugh14:30
rlandypanda:k - moving the rdoinfo base14:31
*** skramaja has quit IRC14:33
rf0lc0panda, rlandy we don't have a solution yet for this, raising a red flag there (base job in sf needs to be defined, and sf manages base job with sfconfig on every upgrade by resetting it)14:35
rf0lc0ideally sfconfig needs to keep base job imo14:36
rlandyrf0lc0: panda: so this blocks our transition14:36
rf0lc0yes, need to talk to them14:36
pandarf0lc0: can we just merge this and the add the base whereeve it's needed to not be removed during upgrade at a second time ?14:37
rf0lc0panda, according to them, sfconfig will manage base job and its playbooks14:38
rf0lc0panda, an alternative would be shadowing zuul-jobs so we maintain a copy of multinode job and reparent to base-upstream or base-minimal14:39
pandafwho are you talking to and where ?14:39
rf0lc0sf-ops14:40
rf0lc0nhicher14:40
rlandyno more conversation there as I see it?14:40
rlandywhere did we leave it?14:40
pandaok14:40
marios|roverkopecmartin|ruck: weshay fyi https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1792872 still happening (today on master see comment #4) and marked https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1794952 duplicate for this one14:46
openstackLaunchpad bug 1792872 in tripleo "[queens] overcloud prepare image failed by giving IronicAction.node.set_provision_state failed: 'NoneType' object has no attribute '__getitem_" [Critical,Incomplete] - Assigned to Quique Llorente (quiquell)14:46
openstackLaunchpad bug 1792872 in tripleo "duplicate for #1794952 [queens] overcloud prepare image failed by giving IronicAction.node.set_provision_state failed: 'NoneType' object has no attribute '__getitem_" [Critical,Incomplete] - Assigned to Quique Llorente (quiquell)14:46
weshaymarios|rover, /me looks14:47
marios|roverweshay: ack, i want to re-add the promotion blocker to it (though, it isn't happening every run, it isn't difficult to find recent examples) and also remark as triaged14:48
weshayah ya.. was just talking about that14:49
weshaymarios|rover, anything I can do to help drive this?14:49
marios|roverweshay: not yet, am gonna ping some folks now i think i've reached the limit of staring at mistral for today :)14:50
weshaymarios|rover, ok14:50
marios|roverweshay: but agree on the promotion blocker then?14:50
marios|rover(even though not consistent)14:50
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-3nodes-multinode, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario009-multinode-oooq, tripleo-quickstart-extras-gate-master-delorean-full-featureset052 @ https://review.openstack.org/560445,  (1 more message)14:51
rlandychkumar|pyconind: I see your review here but no comments or vote ... https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/16412 - any thoughts?14:51
*** ssbarnea|bkp2 has joined #oooq14:51
weshaymarios|rover, I'll make the case for alert + promotion blocker14:51
*** ssbarnea|bkp2 has quit IRC14:51
marios|roverweshay: k i just re-marked triaged too14:51
weshaymarios|rover, 3rd party jobs are at 40% pass rate14:51
chkumar|pyconindrlandy: I seen the panda comments so holded back14:52
*** ssbarnea|bkp2 has joined #oooq14:52
rlandychkumar|pyconind: we're ready to merge so if you have comments - pls add them14:52
*** ykarel_ has quit IRC14:54
ssbarnea|bkp2i was away due an unexpected outage from my router,... still not fully recovered as backup vanished.14:55
rlandypanda: well the damage is done now ... w+114:56
weshaypanda, did you send out a notice?14:58
pandaweshay: we didn't pull that trigger yet14:59
weshaypanda, when would you expect to?14:59
pandaweshay: just adding to the preparation14:59
weshaysome lead time is nice14:59
weshayk14:59
pandaweshay: I prefer rlandy to be present, so I'd say tomorrow or the day after at 13 UTC, or just after the scrum meeting15:00
rlandybase is merged - step 115:00
rlandypanda: I'm not taking any more PTO:)15:01
weshaypanda, present for what?15:01
pandaweshay: changing all references to legacy jobs in periodic pipelines to translated jobs15:02
rlandymoving to done ... https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/task/9?kanban-status=144727515:03
weshaypanda, sure.. when you are sending an email to openstack-dev[tripleo] ?15:03
pandaweshay: now15:03
rlandynow is ok by me ..15:03
rlandystarting work on https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/task/10?kanban-status=144727515:04
*** ykarel has joined #oooq15:07
pandahttp://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-October/135388.html15:09
*** jtomasek has quit IRC15:10
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq15:10
weshaypanda, perfect.. thanks15:11
rlandypanda++15:11
hubbot1rlandy: panda's karma is now 215:11
ssbarnea|bkp2sshnaidm quiquell|off - see my last comment on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/605843/7/toci_quickstart.sh@73 - let me know which path should I take. thanks.15:12
sshnaidmssbarnea|bkp2, these names are just for example15:13
sshnaidmssbarnea|bkp2, you can call them whatever you want15:14
rlandypanda: working on https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/16370/ now15:14
ssbarnea|bkp2sshnaidm: I know it is not standard, but I would go for using lowercase version, exactly the same as the ansible one.15:14
pandarlandy: great15:14
rlandypanda:I am going to put the rdoinfo jobs in your left-to-translate file15:15
*** jfrancoa has quit IRC15:15
sshnaidmssbarnea|bkp2, why?15:15
ssbarnea|bkp2sshnaidm: just to avoid using ANSIBLE_*15:16
pandarlandy: I have a user story for it15:16
pandaoh the file15:16
sshnaidmssbarnea|bkp2, why to choose not standard way if you can choose standard way? :)15:16
pandarlandy: I think we can remove them , everythign is translated, and the rest (rdoinfo) has a user story dedicated to it15:17
ssbarnea|bkp2sshnaidm: because I do not want to add vars that may mean something to ansible. I know how it loads options from envvars so I don't want to clash with it.15:17
rlandypanda: remove the LEFT_TO_TRANSLATE and TO_TRANSLATE files?15:17
sshnaidmssbarnea|bkp2, you can call it like KITTY_ANSIBLE_DISTRIBUTION and KITTY_ANSIBLE_DISTRIBUTION_MAJOR_VERSION, just an idea15:17
ssbarnea|bkp2sshnaidm, or I will just remove the ANSIBLE_ prefix and define ones without this prefix. it should be safe.15:17
rlandyI am adding a review based off this one with the rdoinfo stuff - link to user story so I can add that review?15:18
sshnaidmssbarnea|bkp2, it's less cute than KITTY_* vars, but I'm fine with that...15:18
ssbarnea|bkp2sshnaidm: thanks, going to make the chance now.15:18
pandarlandy: yep, they've always been just temporary fils to me15:18
rlandyfine15:18
pandarlandy: https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/us/109?no-milestone=115:19
pandarlandy: https://tree.taiga.io/project/tripleo-ci-board/task/7815:19
*** rf0lc0 is now known as rfolco_doc15:28
pandarfolco_doc: use sphinx15:30
*** hamzy has quit IRC15:40
ssbarnea|bkp2weshay quiquell|off : see https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1786106/comments/12 and let me know what you think.15:41
openstackLaunchpad bug 1786106 in tripleo "containers-prep fails w/ update_containers is undefined due to lack of default" [High,Fix released] - Assigned to Quique Llorente (quiquell)15:41
*** hamzy has joined #oooq15:43
weshayssbarnea|bkp2, that looks like a new bug15:43
weshaynever seen update_containers_append_tag15:43
weshaypersonally15:43
* weshay looks15:43
weshayssbarnea|bkp2, so I think for rdo phase 1.. minimal config.. we should set.. update_containers: false15:45
weshayif it's not already15:45
rlandyrfolco_doc: posted responses to your comments on https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/16370/44 - pls see if everything is addressed. rdoinfo stuff is moving15:45
ssbarnea|bkp2weshay: i am adding a default value for it in the role. should I also raise a bug?15:49
weshayssbarnea|bkp2, ah fak wtf happened here?15:50
weshayssbarnea|bkp2, read through the console again15:50
weshayssbarnea|bkp2, read through the full console15:52
weshaywonder when this started to happen15:52
weshayssbarnea|bkp2, does that happen in other jobs?15:53
weshayssbarnea|bkp2, does it happen when you run quickstart.sh locally?15:53
ssbarnea|bkp2weshay: i didn't test locally, just seen the failure on a change that was unrelated to this. without much context, I see no harm in having values inside defaults/main.yaml15:55
weshayssbarnea|bkp2, you are not looking carefully enough yet...15:55
weshaywhy is that role even running?15:55
weshaythere15:55
weshayyou don't have the historical context to make that call15:55
weshaybut.. that is my first question15:56
weshayssbarnea|bkp2, why does it not happen here? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/560445/15:57
weshaypanda, did you review https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BJPnKvwmdEO5keyNgGTOwS1Sx5-ubp7W7fDbmZMkGis/edit15:59
*** vinaykns has quit IRC16:00
*** saneax has quit IRC16:00
rlandypanda: rfolco_doc: pls review updated https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/16370/ - note rdoinfo work has moved to https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/16762/16:01
rlandyweshay: ^^16:01
rlandyhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/16765 - sorry - rdoinfo work is there16:02
ssbarnea|bkp2weshay: if I am not wrong the difference is that one job was running on tq repo and the other in tqe repo, same params for invocation of that line.16:04
pandaweshay: not yet16:05
weshaypanda, last chance before I send it16:06
*** chem has quit IRC16:06
weshayssbarnea|bkp2, are you noticing the wrong differences?16:08
weshayis the invocation the same?16:08
weshaythe playbooks used the same16:08
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away16:09
pandaweshay: added two comments.16:11
weshaypanda, chatting here to speed this up16:11
weshaystandalone will test more?16:11
*** toure is now known as toure|biab16:12
ssbarnea|bkp2weshay: nope, clearly the one that failed used much older revision dev867 instead of dev99516:12
pandaweshay: stantalone focus is the services and less the workflow16:12
weshaypanda, are speaking about upgrades?16:12
pandathat's the kinf of coverage the people should expect from it16:12
weshaythe same service that runs on the standalone runs on multinode16:13
weshaynot sure why coverage would be increased w/ standalone16:13
weshayat least as they exist in our project16:13
weshayoutside of our project16:13
weshaywhere it's a single service deployment16:13
weshayI would agree16:13
weshaymaybe that is what you are referring to16:14
*** trown is now known as trown|lunch16:14
pandaweshay: yes, but you're not installing the ovecloud at all, you're not emulating a tripleo in production. This is used to focus on the services more than tripleo workflow, with all the negative /positive aspects16:15
pandaweshay: mainly to say : "use this if the focus of you test is on the service itself, stick to multinode/ovb if you are testing the workflow"16:16
ssbarnea|bkp2weshay: what i found is that pip finds tripleo-quickstart-extras 2.1.1.dev1087 and decided to downgrade it to tripleo-quickstart-extras-2.1.1.dev867  for no visible reason.16:19
weshayssbarnea|bkp2, +116:19
weshayssbarnea|bkp2, that is fucking jenkins pip cache16:20
ssbarnea|bkp2weshay: it does not make any sense to me, it has a newer version but decides to downgrade it. maybe the version comparison fails, doing a non alphanumberic sort on it? i doubt it has anything to do with caching.16:21
weshaypip cache16:21
weshaygaurantee16:21
weshayssbarnea|bkp2, recreate it locally :)16:22
weshaytry it16:22
*** panda is now known as panda|off16:24
*** toure|biab is now known as toure|food16:24
rlandyrfolco_doc: requesting your review on https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/16370/ before merge16:26
rlandyno usage yet - just job definitions16:26
weshayall: please read through http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2018-October/135396.html when you have a minute16:33
ssbarnea|bkp2weshay: while trying to replicate bug locally I found something very weird "python setup.py egg_info" stalls forever, with no reason, probably a local problem but that was weird.16:39
rlandyweshay:  featureset021 - 3ctrl_1comp or 1ctlr_1comp??? there is some confusion between the job def and job reference.16:41
weshayrlandy, how so?16:42
weshayoh16:42
weshayhem16:42
weshayhrm16:42
weshayrlandy, so it should really match fs2016:42
weshayin config and nodes16:42
weshayimho16:42
rlandyso 1ctrl16:42
rlandywell, it is now16:42
*** holser__ has quit IRC16:44
toskyweshay: hi, about your email on the upcoming changes: you listed few additional jobs, including standalone-sahara, but I think it would make sense to have a unique job with both sahara and manila, if you don't mind16:48
toskyor if it's not a problem16:48
toskyand if you need to consolidate further16:49
weshaytosky, it's not just my call man16:49
toskyweshay: sure, so is it a general tripleo discussion? Or a discussion of the CI squad?16:50
toskytrying to rephrase: where should I bring this feedback? A reply to that email? Joining some specific meeting?16:50
toskyswitching panda|off upside down?16:50
tosky:D16:50
weshay#tripleo and tripleo mtg imho16:50
toskyoki16:51
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-3nodes-multinode, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario009-multinode-oooq, tripleo-quickstart-extras-gate-master-delorean-full-featureset052 @ https://review.openstack.org/560445,  (1 more message)16:51
*** chkumar|pyconind has quit IRC16:51
panda|offtosk: or switch me up16:54
*** chandankumar has joined #oooq16:56
*** bogdando has quit IRC16:57
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC17:02
*** chandankumar has quit IRC17:07
*** trown|lunch is now known as trown17:11
rookrascasoft: so i just looked at that link. and it is missing the undercloud.qcow217:16
weshayrook, that is not used anymore :)17:17
weshayit's not missing17:17
weshayyou only need the overcloud-full man17:17
rookweshay: lol ok17:19
*** rfolco_doc has quit IRC17:23
rookhey weshay so - i imported that image into glance (not the tar) and tried to launch a gust, no bueno -- any other things need to be done to prepare that overcloud full image?17:31
weshayrook, oh.. that is converted into an undercloud via tq17:32
weshayat run time17:32
rookhuh ?17:36
rookweshay: I am missing some context17:36
weshayrook, ya.. what are you trying to do?17:40
weshayrook, basically instead of bulding both an undercloud and overcloud image17:41
weshaywe just build the overcloud-full17:41
weshayat run time.. we virt-customize python-tripleoclient onto the image.. and take a few rpms off17:41
weshayviolla undercloud.qcow17:41
weshayrlandy, can you 1-1 early?17:41
rlandyyeah17:41
rlandyweshay: now?17:43
weshaywhen you are ready..17:43
rlandynow is ok17:43
weshayalthough /me trying to get into blue17:43
*** holser_ has joined #oooq18:03
*** ssbarnea|bkp2 has quit IRC18:33
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp-featureset022-pike @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-3nodes-multinode, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario009-multinode-oooq,  (1 more message)18:51
*** rfolco has joined #oooq18:56
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off19:03
*** holser_ has quit IRC19:07
*** ssbarnea|bkp2 has joined #oooq19:18
rlandyrfolco: any idea where panda|off put playbooks/legacy-tripleo-ci-periodic-base/post.yaml - I don;t see it or any review for it19:24
rfolcorlandy, looking19:25
rlandyrfolco: should be in https://github.com/rdo-infra/review.rdoproject.org-config/tree/master/playbooks19:25
rfolcoisn't https://github.com/rdo-infra/review.rdoproject.org-config/blob/master/playbooks/legacy-tripleo-ci-periodic-base/post.yaml19:27
rfolco?19:27
*** toure|food is now known as toure19:30
*** rfolco has quit IRC19:47
rlandyweshay: you familiar with the container build jobs?20:14
rlandyhttps://github.com/rdo-infra/review.rdoproject.org-config/blob/master/playbooks/legacy-periodic-tripleo-centos-7-master-containers-build/run.yaml#L13820:14
weshayrlandy, yes.. /me looks20:17
rlandyweshay: I am converting that job ... I need to know if I need another run.yaml or if I can put that last piece in a post.yaml20:18
rlandyI need a new post.yaml anyways for https://github.com/rdo-infra/review.rdoproject.org-config/blob/master/playbooks/legacy-periodic-tripleo-centos-7-master-containers-build/post.yaml#L720:18
weshayrlandy, that is a run.yml20:18
weshaythat is in fact the script that runs the playbook that runs the rule that builds the containers20:19
weshayhag gad yaa... hag gad ya20:19
rlandyweshay: correct but that run is the same as other run.yaml files (it just has that last task at the end)20:20
rlandyie: as a converted job, it will run runv320:22
rlandyand then I will either need to add an additional run step or an additional post20:22
weshayrlandy, hrm20:25
weshayor could it be added to shell line in 103?20:25
weshayrlandy, or convert that to a jinja template20:25
rlandyline 103 will be gone20:26
weshayok20:26
weshayand what else is in the run.yml20:26
rlandyreplaced with https://github.com/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/blob/master/playbooks/tripleo-ci/run-v3.yaml20:26
weshaybecause 138 is the heart of that job20:26
rlandyweshay: well, I can add another run.yaml20:27
rlandythat will hopefully run after run v320:28
rlandyand that can be a template20:28
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp-featureset022-pike @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-3nodes-multinode, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario009-multinode-oooq,  (1 more message)20:51
rlandyweshay, here is the design decision ...20:52
rlandy A job only has a single main playbook, and when inheriting from a parent, the child’s main playbook overrides (or replaces) the parent’s. However, the pre- and post-playbooks are appended and prepended in a nesting fashion. So if a parent job and child job both specified pre and post playbooks, the sequence of playbooks20:52
rlandyso there is only one run allowed20:52
rlandywe can either:20:52
rlandyadd the container build to runv3 and when: var it20:52
rlandyadd the container build as a post20:52
rlandydupl runv3 and add the container piece in a specific run.yaml20:53
rlandy^^ preference?20:53
*** Vorrtex has quit IRC20:57
*** holser_ has joined #oooq21:04
*** trown is now known as trown|outtypewww21:05
*** holser_ has quit IRC21:28
*** agopi is now known as agopi|brb21:30
*** agopi|brb has quit IRC21:37
*** jtomasek has quit IRC21:54
*** hubbot1 has quit IRC22:07
*** hubbot1 has joined #oooq22:08
*** agopi|brb has joined #oooq22:13
*** tosky has quit IRC22:24
*** agopi_ has joined #oooq22:36
*** agopi|brb has quit IRC22:38
*** agopi__ has joined #oooq22:38
*** dsneddon has quit IRC22:39
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq22:39
*** agopi_ has quit IRC22:41
*** agopi__ has quit IRC22:47
*** agopi__ has joined #oooq22:47
hubbot1FAILING CHECK JOBS on master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/604298, stable/pike: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp-featureset022-pike @ https://review.openstack.org/602248, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-3nodes-multinode, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario009-multinode-oooq,  (2 more messages)22:51
*** agopi__ has quit IRC22:58
*** agopi__ has joined #oooq22:58
*** agopi__ has quit IRC23:06
*** agopi__ has joined #oooq23:06
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|afk23:21
*** dtrainor has quit IRC23:43

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!