Friday, 2018-08-24

*** rlandy|brb is now known as rlandy00:01
weshay|roverrlandy, it should merge in a minute00:16
rlandyyay - here we go now00:17
rlandyChange has been successfully merged by Zuul00:18
*** hamzy has quit IRC00:18
rlandythank you zuul00:18
*** hamzy has joined #oooq00:19
rlandypinged paul with the merge status00:20
rlandyweshay|rover: thank you for getting that through00:24
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|bbl00:34
*** ChanServ has quit IRC01:00
*** ChanServ has joined #oooq01:03
*** barjavel.freenode.net sets mode: +o ChanServ01:03
*** dtrainor has quit IRC01:07
*** dtrainor has joined #oooq01:08
*** jjoyce has quit IRC01:46
*** jjoyce has joined #oooq01:47
*** hamzy has quit IRC02:28
*** panda has quit IRC02:28
*** rlandy|bbl has quit IRC02:28
*** chandankumar has quit IRC02:28
*** sshnaidm|off has quit IRC02:28
*** hamzy has joined #oooq02:30
*** panda has joined #oooq02:30
*** rlandy|bbl has joined #oooq02:30
*** chandankumar has joined #oooq02:30
*** sshnaidm|off has joined #oooq02:30
*** openstack has joined #oooq13:19
*** ChanServ sets mode: +o openstack13:19
*** openstackstatus has joined #oooq13:21
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v openstackstatus13:21
*** openstackstatus has quit IRC13:22
*** openstackstatus has joined #oooq13:23
*** ChanServ sets mode: +v openstackstatus13:23
toskyanyone else would like to add a +w to this review? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/509554/13:32
toskyit has two +2 already13:32
rlandytosky: looking13:32
rlandydone13:34
toskythanks!13:35
rlandyrfolco: weshay|rover: should we live dangerously and merge  https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/15125 and https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/15097?13:35
rlandyhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/581488 is needed for reproducer13:36
rlandybut we can still test the job13:36
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej13:39
weshay|roverrlandy, you talk to paul?13:44
rlandyweshay|rover: no talking with nhicher13:44
rlandyon #sf-dfg13:44
rlandyI can wait for paul if you prefer13:44
rlandyhe's the support person now afaict13:45
weshay|rovergo 4 it13:45
rlandyweshay|rover: rfolco: ykarel: could I get some reviews on   https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/15125 and https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/15097 (looking to merge)13:52
rlandysee discussion above and on #sf-dfg13:52
rlandyweshay|rover: ok - here we go - let's see what damage we do13:59
bogdandoo/14:01
bogdandoshould the oooq_* flavor names quickstart creates be mathching those generated in  http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/tree/roles/libvirt/setup/overcloud/templates/instackenv.json.j2#n38)?14:02
ykarelrlandy, sorry out of context for me, so u can try if earlier issues are fixed14:02
bogdandoI think I have a mismatch, as my instack env sets profiles to compute and control and not oooq_compute/control14:02
*** jaosorior has joined #oooq14:02
bogdandoright, I see config/nodes/1ctlr_1comp.yml uses node.flavor w/o that oooq_ prefix...14:03
bogdandostill trying to add 2 + 2 to have something working with a simple command like quickstart.sh -N config/nodes/1ctlr_1comp.yml virthost :)14:04
bogdandobut I have it 5 or 314:04
bogdandonot 4 ;(14:04
rascasoftrlandy, if you have time for this https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/148001/14:04
rascasoftthanks a ton :)14:04
bogdandoshouldn't those in config/nodes refer to oooq_* flavors?14:05
bogdandowhat is the expected use case for those if not being used with the built in role to generate flavors?14:05
bogdandoand what am I missing to go with node config as is, w/o overriding dances ?14:07
bogdandomay be I just need14:08
bogdandoflavor_map:14:08
bogdando  control: control14:08
bogdando  compute: compute?14:08
rlandywaiting for https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/15125/ to merge ...14:09
rlandyrascasoft: your other review merged?14:10
rascasoftrlandy, yes milady14:10
rlandyawesoem14:10
rlandyhttps://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/#/c/148001/ merged14:10
rlandybogdando: reading back ...14:11
bogdandolong story short, trying to deploy with14:12
bogdandoflavor_map:14:12
bogdando  control: control14:12
bogdando  compute: compute14:12
bogdandostep_overcloud_prep_flavors: false14:12
rlandyas long as the flavor can fit into what is defined in instackenv you are ok14:12
bogdandoIIUC that's the only suitable set matching the flavor names in node/config templates?14:12
bogdandonice14:12
rlandyso .. do those flavors exist14:12
bogdandoyes14:12
rlandyie: openstack flavor list14:13
bogdandoyeah14:13
rlandywhat is returned?14:13
bogdandorlandy: https://pastebin.com/Ycqq70v314:13
rlandyif your nodes are not sufficient, you will get a deploy error14:13
bogdandoright14:14
rascasoftrlandy++++14:14
bogdandorlandy++14:14
bogdando:)14:14
* rlandy checks your instackenv - sec14:14
bogdandoso I was only thinking of the defaults to let oooq users to deploy w/o additional overrides14:14
bogdandojust shoot -N and voila!14:14
bogdandoso perhaps we need to rebind those to oooq_ ? generated ones?14:15
rlandyhol don14:15
bogdandokk14:15
rlandybogdando: you may hit a problem with disk14:16
rlandycan you paste openstack baremetal node list14:16
rlandyand an ironic node-show on one node14:16
rlandyyou need a bigger disk than the flavor specified14:17
rlandyeven by 1GB is fine14:17
rlandylet's just check that14:17
ssbarnea|ruckweshay|rover sadly timeout seems to be consistent, even after recent changes, 100% failure rate http://zuul.openstack.org/builds.html?job_name=tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-updates --- not sure why this was not visible in dashboard.14:17
rlandyugh  - what do I need to get a merge on rdo-jobs???14:20
rlandybogdando: you with me?14:20
bogdandorlandy: yeah14:21
ssbarnea|ruckrlandy do you know how can I see older zuul logs? the default pagination does not include any successful build and I want to find one to compare with the failing one.14:21
rlandyssbarnea|ruck: which job?14:21
rlandyI can find you one14:21
ssbarnea|rucksee prev link I posted14:21
ssbarnea|ruckthe updates one that does timeout14:21
rlandylet me look14:21
bogdando| 0f8f277e-5ac7-47d6-b5e2-56b5e9f5c791 | control-0 | None          | power off   | clean failed       | True        |14:21
bogdando| properties             | {u'memory_mb': u'4096', u'cpu_arch': u'x86_64', u'local_gb': u'19', u'cpus': u'2', u'capabilities': u'profile:control,cpu_vt:true,cpu_hugepages:true,boot_option:local,cpu_aes:true,cpu_hugepages_1g:true'}14:21
bogdandoI thikn I have flavors mismatch :/14:22
rlandy u'local_gb': u'19'14:22
rlandy^^ too small14:22
bogdandoso to fix the things, we prolly need to relink all node/config files to use the generated oooq_ flavors14:22
bogdandothat worths a UX bug IMO14:22
ssbarnea|ruckwell, i think I found a trick, I filtered by project and I ended up seeing one from 21st14:22
rlandyssbarnea|ruck: you all set?14:22
ssbarnea|ruckrlandy: yeah, no need to bother. unless you know how to fix the timeout issue on updates ;)14:23
rlandyI see a successful job from 2214:23
rlandyssbarnea|ruck: not off hand:(14:24
rlandybogdando: the rest looks ok - you just need a big enough node14:25
rlandyhttp://logs.openstack.org/63/593063/9/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-updates/4640435/14:25
rlandyssbarnea|ruck: ^^ that is the last successful job I can see14:25
rlandyafter that consistent failure14:25
bogdandorlandy: thanks!14:26
* bogdando creates a bug14:26
*** jaosorior has quit IRC14:33
bogdandorlandy: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/178887514:34
openstackLaunchpad bug 1788875 in tripleo "quickstart creates oooq_foo flavors which do not match config/node templated names" [Undecided,New]14:34
bogdandoWDYT?14:34
bogdandosounds fair?14:35
bogdandoand an example for the path B https://github.com/bogdando/oooq-warp/commit/2ce6553f30873805cfa23efe21e3b9fb1b7582a214:36
ssbarnea|ruckrlandy : maybe you can give a hint here https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ssbarnea14:38
rlandysec - just helping rasca14:39
ykarelssbarnea|ruck, weshay|rover fs018 failed in master and rocky twice, any bug for it?14:40
ssbarnea|rucknope14:40
ykarelack, good to have it as it's blocking both promotions now14:41
weshay|roverykarel, http://dashboard-ci.tripleo.org/d/cEEjGFFmz/cockpit?orgId=114:46
weshay|roverhas a list of promotion blockers14:46
weshay|roverand alerts14:46
ykarelweshay|rover, but i can't see fs018 there14:48
weshay|roverssbarnea|ruck, ^14:50
weshay|roverssbarnea|ruck, please write up the bugs on these14:50
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away14:55
rlandyweshay|rover: do you want to 1-1 or too busy today?15:01
weshay|roverrlandy, need a few15:02
rlandyk - no rush15:02
*** trown has joined #oooq15:02
ssbarnea|ruckykarel|away : can you give me a link to the fs018 failure?15:06
*** ssbarnea|ruck has quit IRC15:07
rlandywoohoo - we have a job trigger15:08
weshay|roverrlandy, ready in 3min15:08
ykarel|awayssbarnea|ruck, see last failure in: https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds.html?job_name=legacy-periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-7-multinode-1ctlr-featureset018-master and https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/builds.html?job_name=legacy-periodic-tripleo-ci-centos-7-multinode-1ctlr-featureset018-rocky and two more from current run(openstack-periodic):- https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/status.html15:09
weshay|roverrlandy, k15:11
weshay|roverhttps://bluejeans.com/u/whayutin/15:11
bogdandoweshay|rover: hi! https://review.openstack.org/#/c/594133/2 looks gtg15:13
bogdandogood to goooo15:13
bogdandoalso folks, WDYT of https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/178887515:13
openstackLaunchpad bug 1788875 in tripleo "quickstart creates oooq_foo flavors which do not match config/node templated names, that fails the overcloud deployment" [High,Triaged]15:13
bogdandodid I describe it right?15:14
*** dbecker has joined #oooq15:16
*** jfrancoa has quit IRC15:21
*** kopecmartin has quit IRC15:21
*** radez has joined #oooq15:23
rascasoftssbarnea, have you got 5 mins to discuss an issue I'm having?15:29
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC15:30
weshay|roverssbarnea, need any help?15:32
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off15:38
*** amoralej|off has quit IRC15:39
ssbarneawes, yep but let me finsh “late” breakfast first, see etherpad link15:44
weshay|roverssbarnea, which this one? https://review.rdoproject.org/etherpad/p/ruckrover-sprint1815:48
*** dtantsur is now known as dtantsur|afk16:01
weshay|roverrascasoft, you still around buddy?16:03
bogdandoweshay|rover: ditto https://review.openstack.org/#/c/59310316:04
bogdandogood to go, imo16:04
rascasoftweshay|rover, here I am16:08
rascasoftfighting with pip, cache and cleanings16:08
rascasoft(loosing, of course)16:09
*** bogdando has quit IRC16:11
weshay|roverrascasoft, want to try battling code.eng again? also what's the status on https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/177465316:11
openstackLaunchpad bug 1774653 in tripleo "HA test failed because it is unable to create an instance due to block device mapping invalid (failed to get volume)" [Critical,Triaged]16:11
weshay|roverrascasoft, alex wants to remove promotion blocker16:12
rascasoftweshay|rover, about codeng we should be done16:13
rascasoftweshay|rover, about the bug: I'd agree if I had the opportunity to run HA validations consistently (which is not the case)16:13
*** udesale has quit IRC16:19
weshay|roverrascasoft, ok.. I'm happy to support what ever you think is right.. just let alex know one way or another16:20
rascasoftweshay|rover, you need me to comment the bug?16:21
weshay|roverrascasoft, and or ping alex16:22
rascasoftweshay|rover, first step is to have consistent runs for master16:22
rascasoftweshay|rover, I'll do it immediately, master16:22
weshay|roverrascasoft, sounds like it should be open but not a blocker16:22
weshay|roverimho16:22
weshay|roverdepending on why it's inconsistent16:22
rascasoftweshay|rover, it's inconsistent because of all the CI integration problems I had to deal with in the last months, not for other reasons16:23
rlandyweshay|rover: job never started :( - checking on #sf-dfg16:26
weshay|roverugh k16:26
weshay|roverrascasoft, so.. ya.. we need you in at the tripleo-ci layer16:27
weshay|rovergetting there16:27
weshay|roverrascasoft, I would reraise it as a blocker once we're able to rebuild the issue consistently16:27
weshay|roverrascasoft, it can be a high priority bug w/o being a prod chain blocker16:28
weshay|roveror critical16:28
rascasoftweshay|rover, I obey my lord.16:28
weshay|roverlolz16:28
rlandyrfolco: any ideas?? pls see #sf-dfg16:29
rascasoftweshay|rover, commented the bug and removed the tag16:29
rfolcorlandy, looking16:32
rfolcorlandy, where did you define that the job runs in check pipeline for browbeat ?16:33
rlandyrfolco: <rlandy> the job is defined here:  https://github.com/rdo-infra/rdo-jobs/blob/master/zuul.d/zuul-v3-jobs.yaml16:34
rfolcorlandy, no, I mean, the pipeline16:34
rfolcocheck: <my_job>16:34
rlandy<rlandy> the job is defined here:  https://github.com/rdo-infra/rdo-jobs/blob/master/zuul.d/zuul-v3-jobs.yaml16:36
rlandysorry16:36
rlandyhttps://github.com/rdo-infra/review.rdoproject.org-config/blob/master/zuul.d/tripleo.yaml#L89616:36
rlandyrfolco: ^^16:37
*** gkadam has quit IRC16:38
rfolcorlandy, hmm ... I am checking this https://github.com/rdo-infra/review.rdoproject.org-config/blob/aa3cd2bc33c8a441542e72ac9d6fcbc6c49629fe/zuul.d/upstream.yaml#L1716:42
rfolcotrying to find another example that works... one project there that is in openstack-check pipeline16:43
rlandyrfolco: leagcy 053 s is only defined there as weel16:43
rlandywell16:43
rfolcomy point is the full namespace git.openstack.org vs openstack.org on trigger:16:43
rfolcoits just the same as legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset042-master-tht16:47
rfolcochecking if this job triggers on tht16:48
rfolcohard to find file filter16:49
rascasoftrlandy, it failed while preparing the images https://rhos-dev-jenkins.rhev-ci-vms.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/job/oooq-master-rdo_trunk-bmu-ha-lab-cygnus-float_nic_with_vlans/20/console16:49
rascasoftwe'll never come to an end16:50
rlandyrascasoft: need to deal wit upstream now - will take a look later16:50
rlandyrfolco: the job is listed in zuul v316:50
rlandyit just never started16:50
*** gkadam has joined #oooq16:52
weshay|roverssbarnea, http://logs.openstack.org/40/591540/8/check/tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-updates/fa9fe4f/logs/reproducer-quickstart.sh16:56
rfolcorlandy, ah you mean you see the job listed in zuul status page but it never runs or shows any progress ?16:57
rlandyyes - remains queued16:58
rlandywhich usually means the definition is not found16:58
rlandybut defined https://github.com/rdo-infra/rdo-jobs/blob/master/zuul.d/zuul-v3-jobs.yaml#L216:59
rlandyunless I missed something16:59
*** holser_ has quit IRC16:59
rlandyweshay|rover: ^^ ideas???16:59
weshay|roverssbarnea, https://trello.com/c/tFhFcqor/901-sprint-18-ruck-rover17:02
*** dsneddon has quit IRC17:05
*** trown is now known as trown|lunch17:06
rfolcorlandy, still trying to understand ... I see the job queued there... odd17:16
weshay|roverrlandy, /me reads17:16
rlandyrfolco: talking with nhicher on #sf-dfg17:17
weshay|roverrlandy, re: 596370 ?17:17
rlandyweshay|rover: yep - but talking with rdo infra now17:18
rfolcorlandy, do we have a card for reparenting or can I add your patch to the same card as moving extra playbook to job config ? if so, I add you ass member there17:35
*** tosky has quit IRC17:36
rfolcooh jeez17:37
rfolcosorry s/ass/add17:37
rfolcoenglish can be embarrassing sometimes17:37
rlandyhttps://trello.com/c/TVsZ3Ut6/877-clean-up-rdo-sf-legacy-code-after-zuulv3-migration17:38
rfolcooh, I see... the thing is: your patch is a dependency for my card too, will add there just for reference17:38
rfolcothanks rlandy17:38
rascasoftrlandy, I think I've found where's the problem, for some reason in the config "download_overcloud_image" is not set to true, which causes the process of downloading the images not working and breaks the deploy17:39
rlandyrfolco: do you have +2 on https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/15924/?17:40
rascasoftrlandy, I'm testing it right now by passing an extra var and that step (I'm testing locally on the jenkins workspace using tag overcloud-prep-images) seem to work17:40
rascasoftrlandy, it would be useful to understand why I didn't need it before17:40
rfolcorlandy, sorry did not follow discussion, why revert?17:40
rascasoftrlandy, shouldn't this be part of the usual master config?17:41
rfolcorlandy, I do not have +2 there17:41
rlandyrfolco: paul wants us to test with depens on17:41
rlandyshoot17:41
rlandyI am the only one who does :(17:41
ssbarneaweshay|rover: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1788907 -- added fs018 failure info there - Failed running docker-puppet.py for designate, some hints would be needed.17:42
openstackLaunchpad bug 1788907 in tripleo "Failed running docker-puppet.py for designate" [Undecided,New]17:42
ssbarneaweshay|rover:  please +W https://review.openstack.org/#/c/582501/ (verbose resize failures) as I am again slowed down by it while debugging other builds.17:48
rascasoftrlandy, https://code.engineering.redhat.com/gerrit/148025 added also that download part17:48
rlandyrascasoft: reading back17:50
rascasoftrlandy, in any case it failed again. Is there any other option for ./ironic-python-agent.initramfs ?17:51
*** saneax has joined #oooq17:51
rascasoftrlandy, I'm really out of energies and ideas17:52
rlandysorry - we're just trying to migrate rdo to v317:53
rascasoftrlandy, I really don't know what is going on here17:55
rascasoftrlandy, I'm turning off, too late here, see you next week17:55
rlandyrascasoft: ok - I'll look at it more this afternoon17:55
rascasoftrlandy, ok if you find something and I should do something please comment the review, I'll work on it17:56
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq18:00
ssbarnearlandy: for some reason on my machine (repro') virt-resize fails because files are owned by root, running same task as root works, but inside reproducer we do not have any sudo: yes.18:11
ssbarneamy personal take is that we should need root access but at the same time I wonder how these file endup owned by root. i wonder if this a libvirt misconfig on my machine.18:12
rlandysame thing happened to me yesterday18:13
rlandyI use a diff dir for images18:13
rlandyand set permissions on that dir18:13
rlandyand then pass that dir as an extra-var18:13
*** trown|lunch is now known as trown18:16
ssbarnearlandy: this sounds like a serious bug in reproducer, one that impacts its sole purpose. time to dig a little bit on how to fix it.18:17
ssbarneai need to find out who creates this files as root as i didn't see any become in fetch images code.18:18
rlandyssbarnea: ok - just kind of busy with rdo v3 atm and then I have to help with rascasoft's work so whatever you think18:18
ssbarneathanks, it really helped to get conf from you about this. at least I know is something to fix in repro.18:19
*** gkadam has quit IRC18:30
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|brb18:32
*** rlandy|brb is now known as rlandy18:50
*** saneax has quit IRC19:04
*** dsneddon has quit IRC19:06
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq19:07
weshay|roverrlandy, need anything?19:09
weshay|roverssbarnea, you still around/19:11
weshay|roverssbarnea, fyi.. https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1788907 is a promotion blocker, not an alert19:11
openstackLaunchpad bug 1788907 in tripleo "Failed running docker-puppet.py for designate" [Undecided,New]19:11
weshay|roverbecause it's only impacting the promotion jobs19:11
ssbarneaahh, ok. I added a line about this on your google doc.19:14
rlandyweshay|rover: just going through failure from test on removing legacy19:27
*** apetrich has quit IRC19:32
weshay|roverrlandy, so it finally kicked?19:33
rlandyweshay|rover: yep and failed ...19:33
weshay|roverping for eyes19:33
rlandysee discussion on #sf-dfg19:33
rlandy<pabelanger> 2018-08-24 17:35:14,263 DEBUG zuul.AnsibleJob: [build: 5a7230d967cb4928bde619dfc92fa4b0] Ansible output: b"ERROR! the role 'legacy-copy-jenkins-scripts' was not found in19:33
rlandy<pabelanger> /tmp/tmp2yxuinem/5a7230d967cb4928bde619dfc92fa4b0/untrusted/project_3/git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/playbooks/openstack-zuul-jobs/legacy/roles:/tmp/tmp2yxuinem/5a7230d967cb4928bde619dfc92fa4b0/ansible/pre_playbook_5/role_1/rdo-jobs/roles:/tmp/tmp2yxuinem/5a7230d967cb4928bde619dfc92fa4b0/ansible/pre_playbook_5/role_3/zuul-jobs/roles:/tmp/tmp2yxuinem/5a7230d967cb4928bde619dfc92fa419:33
rlandy<pabelanger> b0/untrusted/project_3/git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/playbooks/openstack-zuul-jobs/legacy19:33
rlandyweshay|rover: see comment left here ... https://review.openstack.org/#/c/578432/8/zuul.d/base.yaml19:34
rlandyso I tried to remove it - not so simple  - we get failures19:35
rlandyweshay|rover: tried this test patch ... https://review.openstack.org/#/c/596422 - no good19:36
rlandywill have to work on what is really needed there19:36
weshay|roverbah19:38
rlandyso that is where we are19:39
rlandyweshay|rover: last comment there was ...19:43
rlandy<pabelanger> rlandy: that info can we read from the inventory now19:43
rlandyso we would need to rewrite that role to use inventory19:44
weshay|roverrlandy, I don't think this worked https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/15902/2/zuul.d/zuul-legacy-jobs.yaml20:05
weshay|roverrlandy, bah.. I added it to periodic :(20:07
rlandylol20:08
rlandyweshay|rover: ok - judgment call here ...20:08
weshay|roverrlandy, https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/15927/1/zuul.d/zuul-legacy-jobs.yaml20:09
weshay|roverrlandy, which role do we need to rewrite?20:09
rlandyweshay|rover: sec - back to your change ...20:09
rlandysince 3rd party does not vote anyways, why the voting: false change?20:10
rlandywe can merge with rdocloud -120:10
weshay|roverrlandy, right20:10
weshay|roverrlandy, to get folks to respect the -120:10
weshay|roverfor humans20:11
* rlandy does not have faith in human respect20:11
rlandyI mean there is nothing wrong with the change20:11
rlandybut we should fix it20:11
weshay|roverrlandy, we are trying20:11
weshay|roverit's not easy20:11
rlandyok - I +2'ed20:13
rlandycan you w+1 on this or only I can?20:13
weshay|roverrlandy, I think you have to20:14
weshay|roverthanks20:14
rlandyweshay|rover: done20:16
rlandyweshay|rover: ok - now back to my question ...20:16
weshay|roverk20:16
rlandyweshay|rover: I put in this change ... https://review.openstack.org/#/c/596422/2/playbooks/openstack-zuul-jobs/legacy/pre.yaml20:16
rlandywhich so far is working ok20:16
rlandyisn't not a complete rewrite of legacy20:17
rlandybut it does deal with the eeror20:17
rlandyerror20:17
rlandyyour call if I should try rewrite that role20:17
rlandyor see if this is good enough to get us by20:17
weshay|roverrlandy, looks for it20:17
rlandyweshay|rover: see progress so far on http://zuul.openstack.org/20:18
rlandylet me know what you think20:18
weshay|roverrlandy, why was that not20:18
weshay|roverrole: legacy-copy-jenkins-scripts20:19
weshay|roverand where is the src for that20:19
* weshay|rover looking20:19
rlandyopenstack-zuul-jobs20:19
* weshay|rover sees it called here in the same way http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/openstack-zuul-jobs/tree/playbooks/legacy/pre.yaml#n620:20
rlandythat is the issue20:20
weshay|roveroh reallhy20:20
weshay|roverlolz20:20
weshay|roverfak20:20
rlandycauses a dep on untrusted/project_3/git.openstack.org/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/playbooks/openstack-zuul-jobs/legacy20:21
rlandy role 'legacy-copy-jenkins-scripts' was not found in20:22
weshay|roverrlandy, looks like it's pasisng20:22
* weshay|rover has a thought20:22
rlandyI just removed that call to see what it impacted20:22
rlandythis is like whack-a-mole20:22
rlandyweshay|rover: it wasn't passing when I removed the whole playbook20:24
rlandybut this could work20:24
weshay|roverrlandy, ya.. we need pre20:25
weshay|roverif that's what you mean20:25
rlandyyep20:26
weshay|roverrlandy, another way to see if we need that.. https://review.openstack.org/59646920:26
weshay|roverhttps://github.com/openstack-infra/openstack-zuul-jobs/commit/842f2416183778a4c0052edc338708fb180d194120:26
rlandyweshay|rover: not sure how that would help - we need to remove our call20:28
rlandyanyways - I'll have to ask paul if that is good enough a change or of he wants legacy gone altogether20:28
weshay|roverrlandy, ya.. just want to see what breaks20:31
weshay|roverlolz20:31
rlandyme too20:32
rlandynothing like waiting for an explosion20:32
rlandyweshay|rover: were you tracking rascasoft's stuff at all?20:48
weshay|roverrlandy, I ff'd the internal branches for him20:48
weshay|roverrlandy, that is all I know20:48
rlandyweshay|rover: k - looks like he's getting as far as prep-images20:49
weshay|roverrlandy, which job?20:49
rlandyttps://rhos-dev-jenkins.rhev-ci-vms.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/job/oooq-master-rdo_trunk-bmu-ha-lab-cygnus-float_nic_with_vlans/20/consoleFull20:49
rlandywith an h20:49
rlandybetter than before - checking his error20:51
weshay|roverrlandy, hrm.. that worked on our jobs20:51
weshay|roverrlandy, https://rhos-dev-jenkins.rhev-ci-vms.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/job/rdo-promote-master-rdo_trunk/247/20:51
weshay|roverwhy doesn't he have logs :(20:52
weshay|roverrascasoft, man.. stegatzi20:52
weshay|rover:)20:52
rlandymay be my fault :(20:53
rlandyI'll fix that20:53
rlandyjenkins, why are you sooooooo slow??20:53
weshay|roverrlandy, his jobs were passing in your spot checks w/ fs001 right?20:54
weshay|rovercould be his config fell behind again20:54
weshay|rover --config $WORKSPACE/tripleo-environments/hardware_environments/ha-lab-cygnus/network_configs/float_nic_with_vlans/config_files/config.yml \20:54
rlandyI have no idea20:54
rlandyok - will collect logs now20:55
rlandyretriggering20:55
rlandylucky 2120:56
weshay|roverrlandy, did the osp-13 job ever work for you?20:58
rlandyweshay|rover: died on overcloud-deploy - because if node cleaning20:59
rlandyI was at the point of removing node cleaning and running agin20:59
rlandycan trigger that in a few20:59
rlandyyou see what I mean about dumping stuff??20:59
weshay|roverrlandy, ya.. we have you on too much21:01
weshay|roverrlandy, again21:01
weshay|roverI think if we can close out zuulv3.. on rdo things will fall back into place21:01
weshay|roverthe size of creating jobs for browbeat/ha-utils grew x5 after paul migrated zuul21:02
weshay|roverplanning is hard.. when the physics you plan w/ change21:02
rlandyweshay|rover: sec - mom on phone21:06
weshay|roverrlandy, say hi and good shaboos21:06
*** trown is now known as trown|outtypewww21:08
rlandyweshay|rover: k - back ... not a big deal on rhos-13 - I have the change - will just trigger again21:18
rlandyrascasoft's job should collect logs if it fails again21:18
weshay|roverrlandy++21:23
weshay|roverrlandy, I think ur good on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/596422/21:30
rlandyweshay|rover: ack - going to ping paul about it on #sf-dfg in a sec - just clearing ws on downstream21:31
rlandyweshay|rover: https://rhos-dev-jenkins.rhev-ci-vms.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/job/tq-gate-rhos-13-ci-rhos-ovb-featureset001/147/console - with no node cleaning21:35
weshay|roverrlandy, and we want that across all versions ? no21:36
weshay|rovernow21:36
rlandyweshay|rover: remove cleaning - no21:36
weshay|roverrlandy, /me looking at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/577230/17/config/general_config/featureset001.yml21:37
rlandyjust testing -the job is dnm21:37
weshay|roverk21:37
rlandyI can put that in the ci-rhos config if need be21:37
rlandythis will just give us the chance to test it21:37
weshay|roverthe only change I see is ~/network.yml21:37
weshay|rovernetwork-env.yml21:38
rlandyundercloud_clean_nodes: false21:38
rlandyplus the two changes we have in tqe21:38
weshay|roverya.. but for queens, rocky, master21:38
weshay|roverthat was off21:38
weshay|roverosp-13 is queens21:39
rlandyit was on21:39
rlandyI don;t plan to merge this21:39
rlandyjust test with it21:39
weshay|roverhttps://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart/blob/master/config/general_config/featureset001.yml#L4321:39
weshay|roverrlandy, if the internal job is using fs00121:40
weshay|roverit should be off the way I read it21:40
weshay|rover?21:40
rlandyundercloud_clean_nodes should be true for queens21:40
weshay|roverOH21:40
rlandyin the merged version21:40
rlandyand false in my test version21:40
rlandycleaning is failing21:40
rlandyand leaving the nodes in a bad state21:41
* weshay|rover is confused21:41
weshay|roverbut ok21:41
rlandycausing 'no available node' errors21:41
weshay|roverso.. hrm21:41
rlandyI am trying to skip the cleaning21:41
weshay|rover k k21:41
rlandyand hope that leaves the nodes in a good state to deploy21:41
rlandymake sense?21:41
weshay|roverwell.. from what you say yes21:41
*** rfolco has quit IRC21:41
rlandythe nodes get left in clean failed21:42
weshay|roverfrom your change no21:42
weshay|roverunderstood21:42
rlandyI need them in available to deploy21:42
weshay|roverundercloud_clean_nodes: >-21:42
weshay|rover  {% if release not in ['newton','ocata','pike'] -%}21:42
weshay|rover  true21:42
weshay|rover  {%- else -%}21:42
weshay|rover  false21:42
weshay|rover  {%- endif -%}21:42
weshay|roverqueens ^ is false21:42
weshay|roveroh crap21:42
weshay|roverI'm so wrong21:42
rlandynot really21:42
weshay|roverand tire21:42
weshay|roverd21:42
* weshay|rover quits21:42
rlandyweshay|rover: log off for shabbos early :)21:42
weshay|roverrlandy, ok.. that's the sign.. /me needs to walk way for a bit21:42
weshay|roverrlandy, early.. it's already 5.4321:43
weshay|roverrlandy, have a good weekend.. shabat shalom :)21:43
* weshay|rover out21:43
rlandyI'm not logging off, saying you should21:43
rlandyshabbat shalom21:43
*** dsneddon has quit IRC22:05
*** dsneddon has joined #oooq22:05
rlandywe have logs now22:05
rlandyoh I see ... Required file "./ironic-python-agent.initramfs" does not exist.22:05
*** chem has quit IRC22:16
*** apetrich has joined #oooq22:17
*** rlandy has quit IRC22:33

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!