Tuesday, 2018-07-10

*** rlandy has quit IRC00:10
*** ccamacho has quit IRC00:14
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq00:48
hubbot`FAILING CHECK JOBS on stable/ocata: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024-ocata @ https://review.openstack.org/564291, master: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-container-to-container-upgrades-master @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/56722401:00
*** jbadiapa has quit IRC01:08
*** jbadiapa has joined #oooq01:10
*** yolanda__ has joined #oooq01:33
*** yolanda_ has quit IRC01:36
*** ccamacho has quit IRC01:41
*** rodrigod` has joined #oooq02:18
*** dsneddon_ has joined #oooq02:19
*** rnoriega has quit IRC02:19
*** dsneddon has quit IRC02:19
*** jschlueter has quit IRC02:19
*** bandini has quit IRC02:19
*** rodrigods has quit IRC02:19
*** jaganathan has quit IRC02:19
*** jaganathan has joined #oooq02:19
*** rnoriega has joined #oooq02:20
*** bandini has joined #oooq02:25
*** yolanda_ has joined #oooq02:28
*** yolanda__ has quit IRC02:31
*** jschlueter has joined #oooq02:31
hubbot`FAILING CHECK JOBS on stable/ocata: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024-ocata @ https://review.openstack.org/564291, master: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-container-to-container-upgrades-master @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/56722403:00
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq03:18
*** udesale has joined #oooq03:48
*** ccamacho has quit IRC04:09
*** ykarel|away has joined #oooq04:24
*** saneax has quit IRC04:26
*** yolanda__ has joined #oooq04:46
*** yolanda_ has quit IRC04:49
*** brault has joined #oooq04:49
*** brault has quit IRC04:54
hubbot`FAILING CHECK JOBS on stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/567224, stable/ocata: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024-ocata @ https://review.openstack.org/564291, master: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-container-to-container-upgrades-master @  (1 more message)05:00
*** ykarel|away is now known as ykarel05:21
*** links has joined #oooq05:22
*** pgadiya has joined #oooq05:22
*** pgadiya has quit IRC05:22
*** ratailor has joined #oooq05:32
*** quiquell|off is now known as quiquell05:33
*** bogdando has joined #oooq05:38
*** brault has joined #oooq05:45
*** skramaja has joined #oooq05:46
*** brault has quit IRC05:50
*** brault has joined #oooq05:51
*** jfrancoa has joined #oooq06:03
*** saneax has joined #oooq06:15
*** jtomasek has joined #oooq06:27
*** anande has joined #oooq06:30
*** hamzy has quit IRC06:31
*** yolanda_ has joined #oooq06:36
*** links has quit IRC06:38
*** yolanda__ has quit IRC06:39
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq06:50
*** links has joined #oooq06:53
chkumar|rucksshnaidm|rover: Good morning06:58
sshnaidm|roverchkumar|ruck, hi06:59
chkumar|rucksshnaidm|rover: we are red because of this https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/178085506:59
openstackLaunchpad bug 1780855 in tripleo "undercloud install fails on workflow not found workflow_identifier=tripleo.validations.v1.upload_validations " [Critical,Triaged]06:59
hubbot`FAILING CHECK JOBS on stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container @ https://review.openstack.org/567224, stable/ocata: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024-ocata @ https://review.openstack.org/564291, master: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-container-to-container-upgrades-master @  (1 more message)07:00
chkumar|rucksshnaidm|rover: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/178091007:01
openstackLaunchpad bug 1780910 in tripleo "[pike][ocata][24 hrs][periodic]CREATE_FAILED ResourceInError: resources.CephStorage: Went to status ERROR due to "Message: No valid host was found. , Code: 500"" [Critical,Triaged]07:01
chkumar|ruck24 hrs periodic jobs07:01
*** holser_ has joined #oooq07:02
sshnaidm|roverchkumar|ruck, about validations - which jobs are affected?07:02
chkumar|rucksshnaidm|rover: https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/178085507:02
openstackLaunchpad bug 1780855 in tripleo "undercloud install fails on workflow not found workflow_identifier=tripleo.validations.v1.upload_validations " [Critical,Triaged]07:02
chkumar|rucksecond comment07:02
chkumar|ruckand 3rd also07:02
chkumar|ruckscenario-1 to 4 and 707:02
sshnaidm|roverchkumar|ruck, do you know about any patches of it?07:06
chkumar|rucksshnaidm|rover: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/564204 got merged recently07:07
chkumar|rucksshnaidm|rover: ykarel is checking on this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/581083/07:07
ykarelchkumar|ruck, i can see jobs moving ahead in ^^ -oooq is at tempest07:08
chkumar|ruckykarel: yup oooq-containers has passed07:09
chkumar|ruckykarel: sorry excuting tempest07:09
*** tesseract has joined #oooq07:13
chkumar|ruckykarel: what about triggering against testproject?07:21
ykarelchkumar|ruck, trying https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/13943/07:21
chkumar|ruckykarel: thanks :-)07:22
sshnaidm|roverchkumar|ruck, I see jobs pass, so https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1780855 is solved?07:22
openstackLaunchpad bug 1780855 in tripleo "undercloud install fails on workflow not found workflow_identifier=tripleo.validations.v1.upload_validations " [Critical,Triaged]07:22
chkumar|rucksshnaidm|rover: checking07:23
chkumar|rucksshnaidm|rover: against this one https://review.openstack.org/581083 install the undercloud passed07:24
chkumar|rucksshnaidm|rover: will we wait till the jobs finishes?07:24
sshnaidm|roverchkumar|ruck, I see last jobs pass in grafana07:25
chkumar|rucksshnaidm|rover: removing promotion blocker once https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/13943/ it passes07:25
chkumar|rucksshnaidm|rover: ack07:25
chkumar|rucksshnaidm|rover: let's mark it as solved then07:25
sshnaidm|roverchkumar|ruck, yep07:27
*** hamzy has joined #oooq07:27
quiquellmarios: Can we add new cards to the sprint ?07:27
mariosquiquell: i don't know i get the impression panda wants to do that ? or maybe at least cc/add him so he is aware?07:28
quiquellmarios: Ok07:29
chkumar|rucksshnaidm|rover: we need this https://review.openstack.org/#/c/581202/ to fix master everything07:32
chkumar|ruckinstack undercloud job07:32
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|lunch07:36
sshnaidm|roverchkumar|ruck, can we talk on one channel please? :)07:37
chkumar|rucksshnaidm|rover: sure here07:37
chkumar|rucksshnaidm|rover: sorry07:37
sshnaidm|roverchkumar|ruck, I'd like not to jump on 3 :)07:38
*** kopecmartin has joined #oooq07:38
sshnaidm|roverchkumar|ruck, usually all-tripleo things are discussed in #tripleo, like validations for example07:38
sshnaidm|roverchkumar|ruck, promotions are better here, rdo packaging issues - #rdo07:38
chkumar|rucksshnaidm|rover: yup07:39
sshnaidm|roverchkumar|ruck, about secret issue - let's use the same bug, we already collected there a lot of them07:39
*** tosky has joined #oooq07:39
*** links has quit IRC07:44
*** amoralej|off is now known as amoralej07:48
quiquellmarios: the  test-testenv, would be the OVB counterpart of tripleo.sh --bootstrap-subnodes ?07:52
quiquells/test-testenv/testenv-client/07:52
*** holser_ has quit IRC07:55
mariosquiquell: i haven't considered that. yesterday i was just trying to understand what that --bootstrap-subnodes does and lay out the parts that need transnferring with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/581026/07:55
mariosquiquell: reading testenv-client :)07:56
quiquellmarios: Yep, doing similar exercise with this, will try to add a description and DoD07:56
quiquellmarios: What I see is basically it use te-broker to startup nodes and run toci_quickstart.sh07:56
quiquellmarios: Also outputs a file07:57
*** links has joined #oooq07:57
chkumar|rucksshnaidm|rover: ykarel|lunch legacy-periodic-tripleo-centos-7-master-containers-build passed07:58
quiquellmarios: mayeb this part has to run at run-v3.yaml07:58
chkumar|ruckfrom testproject07:58
chkumar|ruckhttps://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/13943/07:58
mariosquiquell: yeah so one of the unkowns was where the ansible would be invoked. yesterday i was playing with adding to toci_quickstart as we already have ansible there07:59
mariosquiquell: but i wasn't sure07:59
*** yolanda__ has joined #oooq07:59
*** yolanda__ is now known as yolanda07:59
*** yolanda_ has quit IRC08:02
quiquellmarios: I think it goes like this (just to try to understand this)08:04
quiquellmarios: multinode, zuul gives you the nodes and you start to work at one subnode08:05
*** anande has quit IRC08:05
quiquellmarios: ovb (only runs at RDO) you need to explicitly ask for nodes for the baremetal08:06
quiquellmarios: so OVB, runs toci_gate_test at the slaves and toci_quickstart baremetals ?08:08
quiquellmarios: No I am wrong, in OVB toci_quickstart.sh is run at slave too, but using TE_DATAFILE to know where to deploy08:11
mariosquiquell: honestly i don't know i'd have to dig to have this conversationw ith you i didn't check the ovb stuff at all. am checking your https://review.openstack.org/#/c/580974/ just now i see what you meant about running in the run-v3.yaml08:16
*** ykarel|lunch is now known as ykarel08:17
quiquellmarios: We have like tree big phases at zuulv308:18
quiquellmarios: pre/run/post and we can hook there a playbook (more or less)08:18
quiquellmarios: All of them run at zuul slaves08:18
quiquellmarios: now we do everything at run step08:19
quiquellmarios: It ends up runnig the install playbooks at the undercloud node08:19
mariosquiquell: ack yea i am checking the zuul.d/base.yaml now (with the pre-run/run at https://github.com/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/blob/76c0ab4f8be72bb4209925f9d0e28e2c50aa72d8/zuul.d/base.yaml#L28-L3208:19
mariosquiquell: (thanks this is helpful)08:20
quiquellmarios: for me too, I think it like that08:20
*** gkadam has joined #oooq08:20
quiquellmarios: Maybe you cask describe me the nodepool thing a little so we can comment on that08:22
quiquellmarios: bootstrap-sunodes I mean08:23
*** gkadam has quit IRC08:24
mariosquiquell: sure but i didn't dig into details yet i probably should iterate the skeleton (if i understood yetserday it is in scope and looking at your review just now i think it can fit into the end of that run-v3.yaml... its like the last step so we can remove the bash and add another task to include the role08:24
mariosquiquell: so the main invocation is one of https://github.com/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/blob/master/scripts/bootstrap-overcloud-full-minimal.sh or https://github.com/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/blob/master/scripts/bootstrap-overcloud-full.sh08:25
quiquellmarios: Yep, looking at code, a lot of devops code there, perfect for ansible08:25
mariosquiquell: yeah so they both basically do dependencies first08:26
*** holser_ has joined #oooq08:26
quiquellmarios: Also TOCI_JOBTYPE is involve08:26
*** sshnaidm|rover has quit IRC08:26
*** anande has joined #oooq08:27
mariosquiquell: so that is the 'main' bootstrap bit08:27
mariosquiquell: there is some more stuff in pre first though08:27
mariosquiquell: here https://github.com/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/blob/b5b979f34a3f53d6a662d78c19c60468439f99a7/toci_gate_test.sh#L290-L29108:28
mariosquiquell: from common_functions https://github.com/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/blob/b5b979f34a3f53d6a662d78c19c60468439f99a7/scripts/common_functions.sh#L376-L40608:28
mariosquiquell: other than that ... then ??? and of course profit is inevitable08:29
mariosquiquell: or keep it simple for first iteration08:29
mariosquiquell: just do the stuff in function bootstrap_subnodes https://github.com/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/blob/b5b979f34a3f53d6a662d78c19c60468439f99a7/scripts/tripleo.sh#L146208:30
quiquellmarios: We can move to bash templates still in small pieces08:30
mariosquiquell: and leave the pre stuff since looking at your example you are already sourcing the common functions so ...08:30
mariosquiquell: if we are going to use bash for everything else for now08:30
marios?08:30
mariosquiquell: anyway we'll see08:30
mariosquiquell: right or maybe j2 is another option08:30
quiquellmarios: That what I mean, ansible interface j2 implementation for first iteration08:32
quiquellmarios: Then convert j2 into ansible/python08:32
*** sshnaidm|rover has joined #oooq08:32
mariosquiquell: yes i was agreeing with what you said before 'right or maybe j2 ...'08:32
quiquellmarios: Humm also it's noly newton using the bootstrap-overcloud-full.sh08:33
quiquellmarios: Do we have to support newton ?08:33
*** bogdando has quit IRC08:34
*** bogdando has joined #oooq08:35
mariosquiquell: ah cool. well yeah we need newton for ffwd jobs08:35
mariosquiquell: which are newton to queens08:35
quiquellmarios: That's right... also it affects removing the upgrade bash code08:36
quiquellmarios: This part is not using the releases.sh file :-/08:36
*** Goneri has joined #oooq08:36
quiquellmarios: looking at your patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/58102608:42
quiquellmarios: Why do we need a pre and a post ?08:42
mariosquiquell: well the post is more like nice to have for any validation for example08:43
mariosquiquell: the pre was for the stuff from common_functions08:43
mariosquiquell: so we may remove them if we don't use them (like if we keep the functions)08:43
quiquellmarios: If we have a pre, we cannot use .j2 for this part08:45
quiquellmarios: as they the pre .j2 will have to communicate wiuth the bootstrap.yml08:45
mariosquiquell: well depends if they need to pass variable if that is what you mean?08:46
mariosbrb08:46
quiquellmarios: Added sone comments to the review08:51
quiquellmarios: But basically we can move coomon code from the two bootstrap script at pre08:52
quiquellmarios: and have two bootstrap roles, selected reading from release08:52
quiquellpanda: Are you there ?08:53
mariosquiquell: i'd rather  keep one role and just set the different playbook if you mean wrt overcloud-minimal vs normal?08:58
mariosquiquell: but maybe will becoming clearer what works once we get more specific on those reviews.08:59
mariosquiquell: like i should start making ansible tasks at some point :)08:59
hubbot`FAILING CHECK JOBS on stable/ocata: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024-ocata @ https://review.openstack.org/564291, master: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-container-to-container-upgrades-master @ https://review.openstack.org/560445, stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container @  (1 more message)09:00
quiquellmarios: It's not better two have to different roles one for overcloud-minmal and one for normal09:01
quiquellmarios: More than roles, I mean includes09:01
quiquellmarios: In the role select between the two includes09:02
quiquellmarios: reading release09:02
*** sshnaidm|rover has quit IRC09:04
pandaquiquell: more or less09:05
quiquellpanda: Added a card to the sprint09:05
*** sshnaidm|rover has joined #oooq09:05
pandaNOOOOOOOOoooooo......09:05
quiquellpanda: https://trello.com/c/DBDv4ge7/860-create-ansible-module-around-testenv-client09:06
quiquellpanda: That's why I am telling, we can remove it09:06
pandaquiquell: create ansible module around testenv-client ?09:06
quiquellpanda: Yep, it's already a python script09:06
quiquellpanda: Also it outpus the TE_DATAFILE, as a environment variable don't know if this can be a problem09:07
quiquellpanda: If we can move everything to ansible09:07
quiquellpanda: And running command inside maybe it's not necessary if we set TE_DATAFILE correctly09:08
pandaquiquell: one of the design goal is to understand how we cna get rid of the te-broker and all its workflow completely09:08
pandatestenv-client is the client part of te-broker09:08
quiquellpanda: Ok, so we don't speend time refactoring it,09:09
pandaquiquell: nope09:09
quiquellpanda: Ok, removing it09:09
quiquellpanda: Also I see this card https://trello.com/c/X6VWGH9H/858-translate-commonvarsshj2-piece-by-piece-to-ansible-tasks09:11
quiquellpanda: As part of this https://trello.com/c/Rsvd2acu/836-translate-tocigatetestshj2-piece-by-piece-to-ansible-tasks09:11
pandathis is the overflow card09:11
quiquellpanda: common_vars is only used at goci_gate_test09:11
quiquells/goci/toci/g09:11
pandaquiquell: is that bad ?09:13
pandaquiquell: also those card are for AFTER we translate everything into templated bash09:14
*** ccamacho has quit IRC09:16
quiquellpanda: Ok, so maybe we will need more small cards like that for toci_gate_test.sh09:16
*** ratailor has quit IRC09:17
quiquellpanda: What I mean is there are parts at toci_gate_test.sh that don't do a sources09:18
*** ratailor has joined #oooq09:19
pandaquiquell: reading the scrollback log09:20
pandaquiquell: you want to break toci_gate_test.sh into smaller part and assign a card to each of them ?09:20
quiquellpanda: Maybe ?09:21
quiquellpanda: the common_vars.sh is like that09:21
pandaquiquell: because it's a different file to render09:22
quiquellpanda: The output of moving stuff to j2 doesn't have to define the ansible task we need to creaste09:22
pandamarios: I took a look at the bootstrap, have you checked that we reallyu need ALL there is in the bootstrapo code ?09:23
pandaquiquell: ah, sure, you can create smalle card for smal pieces of those files. What we found in previous sprint is that the correct size is hard to identify. Large cards are confusing, small card are usually grouped together anyway09:24
quiquellpanda: Yep difficult matter.09:26
mariospanda: no i mean as you can see it is literally skeleton pointing to the bits in bash we want to transfer. on next iteration i will dig in more09:26
mariospanda: like quiquell pointed out the minimal stuff which uses the toci_jobtype is not as important but still needed for n..q ffwd upgrade jobs for example09:26
pandamarios: yes, just wanted to point out that maybe we need to translate to ansible only a smal part of what's there currently, because most of the tasks are already done alsewhere09:29
mariospanda: ack09:29
quiquellpanda: thinks like this source /etc/nodepool/provider, are no longer needed ?09:30
quiquellpanda: inventory will provide I suppose09:30
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq09:33
pandaquiquell: yes, the provider is a variable in the inventory, but what's different now is that is part of the host definition.09:34
pandaquiquell: so provider is not global anymore, but host specific09:34
quiquellpanda: ack09:35
ssbarneaWho knows who is behind rhos.op.redhat.com ? as it appears hosted on aws but down.09:37
chkumar|ruckykarel: sshnaidm|rover one check job is hitting node failure https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul3/legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-3ctlr_1comp-featureset001-queens-branch is it related to log_url issue?09:37
ykarelchkumar|ruck, no, log_url is just reporting issue09:38
quiquellpanda: What jobs have beign migrated in the previous sprint ?09:40
pandaquiquell: all undercloud jobs, all multinode 2 nodes jobs. Remains to migrate 3 nodes jobs 4 nodes jobs and standalone09:43
quiquellpanda: ack09:44
pandaquiquell: and of course RDO sf jobs09:44
*** ratailor has quit IRC09:47
*** ratailor has joined #oooq09:48
*** jbadiapa has quit IRC09:53
quiquellpanda: Do we need to support the monolithic playbooks like multinode.yaml ?09:56
quiquellor baremetal-full-deploy.yaml ?09:56
pandaquiquell: yes10:16
quiquellpanda: Checking you review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/58061210:17
quiquellpanda: We just specify the list of playbooks and tags per job10:17
quiquellpanda: We just specify multinode.yaml at those jobs10:18
pandaquiquell: exactly10:20
quiquellpanda: This is not too much redundancy specify playbooks per job ?10:20
pandaquiquell: it may yes, we could group the list of playbooks and in zuul configuration specify the name of the group10:24
pandaquiquell: so the only logic that remains is to extend the name to the proper  list10:24
quiquellpanda: tags maybe are a good candidate to be there too10:25
quiquellpanda: they have a 1 to 1 relation to the job and they can also be grouped10:25
mariospanda: quiquell can you add your skeleton reviews to the cards on trello10:47
quiquellmarios: I think I have it all added, also added gabriel's one10:48
mariosquiquell: thanks10:48
quiquellmarios, panda: Do we need a reproducer card ?10:55
*** udesale has quit IRC10:56
pandaquiquell: ah, that's what I was missing yesterday10:58
pandaquiquell: creating10:58
quiquellpanda: Ahh ok10:59
quiquellthanks10:59
quiquellpanda: Have see this at #tripleo "test job that don't use any nodepool node"10:59
quiquellpanda: What it means ?11:00
hubbot`FAILING CHECK JOBS on stable/ocata: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024-ocata @ https://review.openstack.org/564291, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-3nodes-multinode, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario002 (2 more messages)11:00
pandaquiquell: I'm investigating how to remove te broker11:00
pandaquiquell: I'm trying some approaches11:01
quiquellpanda: cool! one thing to consider, if we use zuul encryption maybe we can not use tripleo-ci for jobs definition11:01
pandaquiquell: What I'm doing requires some eplxanation on how te broker works. We cna chat if you want11:02
pandaquiquell: wat ?11:02
quiquellpanda: They have to be in the same project that define secrets11:02
quiquellpanda: And not all the projects can have them11:02
quiquellpanda: Also, you cannot test job not merged if they use secrets11:02
pandaquiquell: hhmm11:02
pandaquiquell: where's the documentation for that ?11:03
quiquellpanda: better you continue with the investigation and explain it to all of us11:03
quiquellpanda: In the trello card, I paste it a test I did for secrets11:03
quiquellpanda: It laso has the ref for docs11:03
quiquellpanda: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/14677/11:04
quiquellpanda: te-broker is only needed for OVB jobs ?11:04
* marios school run biab11:12
pandaquiquell: yes11:14
quiquellpanda: Maybe we need to define a rdo repo with them11:16
quiquellpanda: Are we going to remove playbooks/openstack-zuul-jobs/legacy/pre.yaml dependency ¿?11:17
*** holser_ has quit IRC11:23
*** holser_ has joined #oooq11:26
pandaquiquell: not sure, only if we are able to replace now all the variables11:33
*** atoth has joined #oooq11:34
quiquellpanda: Was taking a look at ZUUL_CHANGES11:34
*** holser_ has quit IRC11:35
pandaquiquell: and ?11:36
quiquellpanda: Looks like ZUUL_CHANGES is not a variable that we create11:37
quiquellpanda: It depends on we executing the zuul legacy mode11:38
*** anande has quit IRC11:38
quiquellpanda: So when do we plan to totally deactivate leagcy mode ?11:38
quiquellpanda: but better be prepare though11:38
pandaquiquell: yep, it's a legacy variable, it's passe to the job with the environment: argument of shell ansible tasks11:39
pandaquiquell: no, the goal is always the same: "what's the smallest step we can take to remove all the legacy parts ?11:39
pandawe'll remove any legacy part as a last step for sure11:40
quiquellpanda: ok, got it, thanks11:40
*** anande has joined #oooq11:45
*** holser_ has joined #oooq11:50
*** holser_ has quit IRC11:51
*** jbadiapa has joined #oooq11:55
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|lunch11:55
*** holser_ has joined #oooq11:57
*** rfolcOUT is now known as rfolco11:59
*** hamzy has quit IRC12:18
rfolcopanda, why j2 is mentioned in https://trello.com/c/6xqcXtM7/859-translate-oooqcommonfunctionsshj2-piece-by-piece-to-ansible-tasks ? the script is not j2.12:18
*** yolanda has quit IRC12:21
pandarfolco: not yet12:23
pandarfolco: it will be before we can take that card into consideration12:24
pandahhmm cards are still not in order12:24
pandaof priority12:24
rfolcopanda, can you please help finding a card ? The 2 that are more clear are owned by marios and quiquell12:25
pandarfolco: are you free to chat ?12:27
rfolcopanda, yes12:27
pandarfolco: in my ready room12:28
pandanumber 1, you have the bridge12:29
*** rlandy has joined #oooq12:35
rlandyweshay: why did you you add promotion-blocker to https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1780780?12:37
openstackLaunchpad bug 1780780 in tripleo "multi-node-bridge role in zuul-jobs uses a released OVS package " [High,Triaged]12:37
weshayrlandy, well if we get blocked moving to zuulv3 I thought I'd call it out as a promotion blocker12:38
rlandyweshay: ok - putting aside apevec's comments in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/580518/, what do you think of hos suggestion to add update steps ( restrart OVS) https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1780780/comments/1?12:41
openstackLaunchpad bug 1780780 in tripleo "multi-node-bridge role in zuul-jobs uses a released OVS package " [High,Triaged]12:41
*** holser_ has quit IRC12:41
rlandyI am not sure if this belongs in CI12:41
rlandyie: if doing update steps are part of a workflow we want to follow12:41
quiquellpanda: Working review only with the j2 so we can play with zuul variables https://review.openstack.org/#/c/581331/12:41
*** yolanda has joined #oooq12:42
weshayrlandy, ugh.. /me chats w/ him on #rdo12:42
rlandyk - following12:42
weshayrlandy, we should not have to add steps after updating a package for things to work12:42
weshayit's a broken package12:43
rlandyweshay: that is my impression from our discussion yesterday12:43
rlandybut we can't reparent until this is sorted12:43
rlandypanda: pls see my question in https://trello.com/c/95AvKjpX/845-migrate-3-and-4-nodes-jobs-to-tripleo-ci-base-parent12:44
*** holser_ has joined #oooq12:47
*** amoralej|lunch is now known as amoralej12:49
weshayrlandy, I think Alan may be ok w/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/580518/12:49
weshayhe is just indicatng it may be a problem if RHEL ever makes it into the ecosystem12:49
rlandyweshay: yeah - he didn't -1 it - so that is a start12:50
rlandyI guess the bug can remain open for discussion12:50
rlandyif we can get the reviews in, that would move the migration to zuulv3 forward12:50
rlandypanda: marios: could I get another core vote on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/581116/?12:55
rlandyrelated to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/580518/12:56
*** yolanda_ has joined #oooq13:00
hubbot`FAILING CHECK JOBS on stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/567224, stable/ocata: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024-ocata @ https://review.openstack.org/564291, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-3nodes-multinode, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001 (2 more messages)13:00
*** skramaja has quit IRC13:02
*** yolanda has quit IRC13:02
rascarlandy, hi there! Do you happen to know why the promotion jobs in rdophase2 for master, queens and pike are all disabled?13:03
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|afk13:03
rascarlandy, oh, my mistake, they are not disabled, it's just that there were no jobs since last week13:04
rascarlandy, I think it's because we're not sseing promotions before in the chain13:05
*** yolanda_ has quit IRC13:05
mariosrlandy: ack13:06
rlandyrasca: probably, the ruck/rover cloud confirm that13:07
*** sanjay__u has quit IRC13:10
chkumar|ruckrasca: rlandy two bugs13:13
chkumar|ruckhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/178072613:13
openstackLaunchpad bug 1780726 in tripleo "[master][queens][pike][ocata] Base periodic jobs are broken after zuul v3 migration " [Critical,Fix released] - Assigned to Sagi (Sergey) Shnaidman (sshnaidm)13:13
chkumar|ruckhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/178085513:14
openstackLaunchpad bug 1780855 in tripleo "undercloud install fails on workflow not found workflow_identifier=tripleo.validations.v1.upload_validations " [Critical,In progress] - Assigned to yatin (yatinkarel)13:14
chkumar|ruckbecause of those promotion has not happened13:14
rascachkumar|ruck, fair enough, thanks. rlandy, do you think it would be possible to structure the jobs so that even if we don't have any promotion the execution happen in any case ate least once a week?13:14
sshnaidm|roverrasca, it doesn't make sense to rerun them on them same dlrn hash13:15
sshnaidm|roverrasca, it won't test anything new13:16
rascasshnaidm|rover, not from the promotion perspective, no. But from a patch perspective yes13:16
sshnaidm|roverrasca, patch perspective..?13:16
rascawhat if in the meantime I've changed HA tests, increased them, and so on13:16
rascasshnaidm|rover ^^^13:17
sshnaidm|roverrasca, are we talking about periodic jobs?13:17
rascasshnaidm|rover, rdophase2 in this case13:17
rascaso I'd say no13:17
rlandyrasca: you can manually rekick those jobs if you wish13:17
rascarlandy, sure, I know13:17
rascaI was just wondering if this could be an automated task13:17
rlandybut running them w/o a new hash is not common13:18
sshnaidm|roverrasca, if it's still jenkins, it's possible to add a trigger13:18
rlandyit could be13:18
*** yolanda_ has joined #oooq13:18
rascasshnaidm|rover, yes, it's Jenkins, I'll investigate on that, thanks13:18
sshnaidm|roverrasca, rlandy I don't know well about HA tests - are they part of rdophase2?13:18
rascasshnaidm|rover, yes, take this as an example https://rhos-dev-jenkins.rhev-ci-vms.eng.rdu2.redhat.com/job/oooq-master-rdo_trunk-bmu-haa16-lab-float_nic_with_vlans/13:19
rlandyI think the concern is that because we are using the same hardware the two could clash for priority13:19
*** arxcruz_ has joined #oooq13:19
sshnaidm|roverrlandy, the two..?13:20
rlandysshnaidm|rover: the daily triggered run and the one triggered by a new hash13:21
rascarlandy, yes, you're right, but at that point they will get into the queue, isn't it?13:21
rlandyif there is no new hash - no harm13:21
rlandyrasca - correct13:21
rlandythey will just queue up13:21
sshnaidm|roverrlandy, yeah, it should be queued13:21
rascarlandy, so no big deal, at worst we'll need to wait13:21
rlandyyou can try it with your jobs and see how it goes13:21
pandarlandy: so scenarios007 and 008 work with paul's workaround ?13:21
rlandyI can show you have to create a daily trigger in jenkins13:21
rlandypanda: ask - see results posted in card13:22
pandarlandy: commending on the cards for the 2 and 4 nodes13:22
rlandypanda: thanks - I can pick that up today13:22
rlandyhoping it's not too big of a deal13:22
*** arxcruz_ has quit IRC13:23
weshaymarios, you have a minute.. rlandy and I probably have some questions about ovs13:26
rlandypanda: to confirm, there are *no* definitions outside of tripleo-ci?13:29
weshaysshnaidm|rover, 1-113:31
mariosweshay: o/ sure are you on a call?13:31
weshaymarios, bad timing, will catch you in abit13:32
mariosweshay: ok np13:32
pandarlandy:  tripleo-ci is the only place where the job is configured and the parent is specified.13:34
rlandymarios: to give you some background - we're having a debate on what should/needs to be done when upgrading OVS13:34
rlandypanda: fine, thanks. just checking that I don't miss other cases13:35
*** holser_ has quit IRC13:42
*** holser_ has joined #oooq13:44
*** ratailor has quit IRC13:50
*** ykarel|afk is now known as ykarel13:51
*** anande has quit IRC13:54
*** yolanda_ has quit IRC14:03
*** rfolco has quit IRC14:06
*** bogdando has quit IRC14:18
*** yolanda_ has joined #oooq14:18
weshaymarios, will catch you at the community mtg14:23
mariosweshay: sure14:23
*** hamzy has joined #oooq14:24
weshayrlandy, when you have a second today.. can we sync up on the perf work14:25
rlandyweshay: ack - whenever you are ready14:26
rlandypanda: pls take a quick look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/581376 and let me know if this is what you had in mind14:30
*** EmilienM is now known as EvilienM14:42
*** quiquell is now known as quiquell|off14:43
*** ykarel is now known as ykarel|away14:44
*** quiquell|off is now known as quiquell14:45
*** quiquell is now known as quiquell|off14:46
*** quiquell|off is now known as quiquell14:47
*** quiquell is now known as quiquell|off14:48
rlandypanda: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/581376 - redone ... 7-4 makes no sense in the job it's used in though  multinode-1ctlr-featureset00914:54
chkumar|rucksshnaidm|rover: weshay today's stuff https://review.rdoproject.org/etherpad/p/ruckrover-sprint16 line: 78-11214:55
sshnaidm|roverchkumar|ruck, I think it's better to strikethrough not-relevant/fixed items14:57
chkumar|rucksshnaidm|rover: sure will do that14:58
hubbot`FAILING CHECK JOBS on stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/567224, stable/ocata: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024-ocata @ https://review.openstack.org/564291, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-3nodes-multinode, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001 (2 more messages)15:00
*** udesale has joined #oooq15:01
*** ccamacho has quit IRC15:05
*** ccamacho has joined #oooq15:06
rlandymarios: checking your drac now ... rdo-ci-fx2-02-s3 correct?15:07
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC15:07
rlandywhat's the issue exactly? you can't login? reprovision with beaker?15:08
rlandycould hrybacki?15:08
rlandyI won't be able to see the setup in beaker as I don;t own that box15:08
rlandyI can try from drac and give you a fresh start to work from15:08
weshaysshnaidm|rover, panda https://review.openstack.org/#/c/580361/15:12
weshaysshnaidm|rover, panda https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/177829115:14
openstackLaunchpad bug 1778291 in tripleo "/home/zuul/workspace/devstack-gate/functions.sh: line 184: declare: gate_hook: not found" [High,Triaged]15:14
mariosrlandy: yeah15:17
mariosrlandy: sorry momentarily afk15:17
mariosrlandy: (was)15:17
mariosrlandy: https://rdo-ci-fx2-01-s3-drac.mgmt.lab.eng.rdu.redhat.com/login.html15:17
mariosrlandy: right so problem is reprovision doesn't seem to be working, ssh just says connectino refused. i tried playing with the drac passwords/created new user even for sanity but same15:18
mariosrlandy: i set things back to default15:19
mariosrlandy: except the install options (Kernel options for the mac addr you told me about15:19
mariosrlandy: actually i since set that back to the default too15:19
mariosrlandy: 'the default' what was there before i mean15:20
mariosyou should be able to view the install options in beaker15:20
mariosrlandy: but let me add you to the box15:21
weshaysshnaidm|rover, panda https://review.openstack.org/#/c/576429/2/roles/virtbmc/tasks/configure-vbmc.yml15:23
weshayhttps://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/177760915:23
openstackLaunchpad bug 1777609 in tripleo "TripleO: Problems installing just the undercloud" [Medium,In progress] - Assigned to wes hayutin (weshayutin)15:23
*** saneax has quit IRC15:23
*** ccamacho has quit IRC15:26
*** links has quit IRC15:26
hrybackirlandy: marios I don't have any rights on that box anymore15:27
marioshrybacki: ack was provision working ok for you/done it any time recently via beaker for that box?15:28
*** jfrancoa has quit IRC15:30
hrybackimarios: it must have worked for me at some point but it's been over a year since I touched the box (or logged into beaker). tbh I didn't know I was still the owner of anything in beaker until I saw the email15:30
marioshrybacki: ack thanks15:31
*** rfolco has joined #oooq15:31
rlandymarios: ok - on drac atm15:36
rlandymarios: your box is stuck in the middle of a reboot15:37
rlandywhat did you try to reprovision to centos7?15:37
weshaypanda, https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/177582615:38
openstackLaunchpad bug 1775826 in tripleo "Can't reproduce more than one stack using reproducer-quickstart." [Medium,Incomplete] - Assigned to Sofer Athlan-Guyot (sofer-athlan-guyot)15:38
mariosrlandy: yeah15:39
weshaysshnaidm|rover, https://review.openstack.org/#/c/571256/15:39
mariosrlandy: centos 7.415:39
weshayrlandy, we fixed this? https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/177356915:39
openstackLaunchpad bug 1773569 in tripleo "TQE: ovb-create-stack.yml role overrides are not working as expected" [High,Triaged] - Assigned to Quique Llorente (quiquell)15:39
rlandymarios: ok - so let's just confirm  https://rdo-ci-fx2-01-s3-drac.mgmt.lab.eng.rdu.redhat.com - I think you mean rdo-ci-fx2-02-s3-drac.mgmt.lab.eng.rdu.redhat.com15:40
rlandy^^ that is what you are assigned on the sreadsheet15:40
rlandyweshay: I'll look at it in a bit and comment15:40
rlandymarios:  https://rdo-ci-fx2-01-s3 is a virthost15:41
mariosrlandy: oh damn in beaker its a different box then. drac is https://rdo-ci-fx2-01-s3-drac.mgmt.lab.eng.rdu.redhat.com/login.html and beaker is https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/view/rdo-ci-fx2-02-s3.v101.rdoci.lab.eng.rdu.redhat.com#access-policy15:41
mariosrlandy: yeah fx2-02 vs fx2-0115:42
mariosrlandy: and in fact that one isn't in beaker15:42
rlandymarios: ack15:42
mariosrlandy: :/ so i will try register it tomorrow15:42
mariosrlandy: thanks for help15:42
rlandymarios: let me see what I can do with it15:43
rlandyI'll do the beaker stuff15:43
rlandyhttps://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/view/rdo-ci-fx2-02-s3.v101.rdoci.lab.eng.rdu.redhat.com#power-settings\\15:44
mariosrlandy: thanks but i don't want to take more time from you :/15:44
weshaymarios, I can help you get it going15:47
mariosrlandy: but that is wrong (what you just pointed at) it should be rdo-ci-fx2-01-s3- fyi15:47
mariosweshay: thanks i'll should if i can't make progress on it by tomorrow15:48
mariosweshay: s/should/shout15:48
rlandymarios: pls check the spreadsheet15:48
rlandy we need to clear this up15:48
rlandyrdo-ci-fx2-02-s3.v101.rdoci.lab.eng.rdu.redhat.com15:48
rlandy rdo-ci-fx2-01-s3 is a virthost15:48
rlandyrdo-ci-fx2-02-s3.v101.rdoci.lab.eng.rdu.redhat.com is correctly assigned to you15:49
mariosrlandy: then beaker is OK15:49
rlandymarios: yes - it juts got stuck in reboot15:49
mariosrlandy: earlier you said 18:40 < rlandy> marios: ok - so let's just confirm  https://rdo-ci-fx2-01-s3-drac.mgmt.lab.eng.rdu.redhat.com - I think you mean  rdo-ci-fx2-02-s3-drac.mgmt.lab.eng.rdu.redhat.com15:49
rlandymy mistake then - sorry15:49
mariosrlandy: and beaker (the one i was working with today ) at https://beaker.engineering.redhat.com/view/rdo-ci-fx2-02-s3.v101.rdoci.lab.eng.rdu.redhat.com#power-settings15:50
rlandyI am rebooting and reprovisioning now to confirm15:50
rlandyit looks like you worked on rdo-ci-fx2-02-s3-drac.mgmt.lab.eng.rdu.redhat.com15:50
mariosrlandy: but you are right. i mean the two are different. the drac address i have is https://rdo-ci-fx2-01-s3-drac.mgmt.lab.eng.rdu.redhat.com/login.html15:50
rlandyfrom beaker15:50
mariosrlandy: but in beaker it is the 02 one15:50
rlandyrdo-ci-fx2-02-s3-drac.mgmt.lab.eng.rdu.redhat.com is the power address15:50
rlandythat is correct15:50
mariosrlandy: ah ok, i was just lokoing at the email weshay sent me and it has both :)15:51
rlandymandreouHTTP2018-07-10 08:21:49 -04:002018-07-10 08:22:20 -04:002018-07-10 08:22:26 -04:00onCompleted15:51
mariosrlandy: ok15:51
mariosbrb15:51
rlandy^^ you have been operating fine through beaker15:51
*** Goneri has quit IRC15:53
mariosrlandy: ack15:54
rlandymarios: this machine never goes to PXE boot15:56
rlandywill have to check the boot options15:57
mariosrlandy: :/ ok from drac the nic is Embedded NIC 1 Intel(R) Gigabit 2P I350 LOM - 10:98:36:14:C5:6F  FYI15:59
mariosrlandy: but note that the power options uses a different address. i tried both but same result15:59
*** sshnaidm|rover is now known as sshnaidm|bbl16:12
*** udesale has quit IRC16:15
rlandymarios: reseating the machine16:20
mariosrlandy: thanks16:20
mariosrlandy: am going to go afk in a minute16:20
rlandyk16:21
mariosrlandy: do you mean reboot? or reset beaker to some defaults or?16:21
rlandyvitula reseat from the drac crontroller16:21
mariosrlandy: oh16:21
*** holser_ has quit IRC16:32
rlandyhmmm ... this machine never goes to PXE boot16:32
mariosrlandy: ack thanks for poking at it16:34
rlandymarios: theboot order is correct16:35
mariosrlandy: i managed to get reproducer to complete on rdo cloud today so i'll continue to use that for now16:35
rlandyand so is the boot nic16:35
mariosrlandy: otherwise i have this beaker box that irssi is running on too for now, though its pretty small16:35
rlandybut not getting pxe boot16:35
mariosrlandy: ok16:35
rlandystuck in edd16:35
rlandywill hav eto ping the lab guys16:35
rlandy I have no further access16:35
mariosrlandy: ack thanks for the help! i have to run now tho please carry on with your life16:38
mariosrlandy: without this box !16:38
mariosrlandy: !16:38
rlandy | primary |   "msg": "Failed to connect to repos.fedorapeople.org at port 443: [Errno 101] Network is unreachable"16:38
rlandy^^ anyone else see this?16:38
mariosrlandy: :/16:38
rlandyhttps://review.openstack.org/#/c/581376/16:39
* marios off ttyl16:39
pandarlandy: isn't that the workaround for the ovs problem ?16:45
pandarlandy: nevermind16:46
rlandypanda: hasn't merged yet https://review.openstack.org/#/c/580518/16:46
*** atoth has quit IRC16:57
*** atoth has joined #oooq17:00
hubbot`FAILING CHECK JOBS on stable/ocata: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024-ocata @ https://review.openstack.org/564291, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-3nodes-multinode, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario002 (2 more messages)17:00
pandarlandy: do you have time for a question on ovb-stack-create ?17:01
rlandyyes17:02
*** amoralej is now known as amoralej|off17:03
*** holser_ has joined #oooq17:04
pandarlandy: I lied, they may be more than one. Do we need to specify a virthost always ?17:04
rlandypanda: pls link where you are refering to a virthost17:05
rlandymostly that is where ansible runs17:05
*** holser_ has quit IRC17:06
*** holser_ has joined #oooq17:07
*** holser_ has quit IRC17:07
*** tesseract has quit IRC17:07
pandarlandy: mmh, I wanted to paste something but I'm confused17:09
rlandyctrl+V will paste - it's not that confusing :)17:09
pandarlandy: do we have an example of the simplest invocation for the ovb-create-stack playbook ?17:09
rlandyyep - in the reproducer17:10
pandarlandy: ok, perfect17:10
rlandypanda: https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-quickstart-extras/blob/master/roles/create-reproducer-script/templates/reproducer-quickstart.sh.j2#L22117:10
pandarlandy: in terminal + weechat ctrl+v doesn't work ... :(17:10
pandarlandy: exaclty, we are passing a virthost as extra var17:11
*** ykarel|away has joined #oooq17:11
rlandy -e virthost=localhost17:11
rlandyhmmm ... I am not sure what happens if we leave it out17:13
*** holser_ has joined #oooq17:13
*** holser_ has quit IRC17:13
pandarlandy: where is openstack-virtual-baremetal repo usually cloned ?17:14
rlandyin the workspace17:14
*** holser_ has joined #oooq17:14
rlandyprobably more its reliance on common-extras stuff17:15
rlandypanda: when you are done, pls see my question on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/581376/17:17
rlandythe 4 node thing looks wrong with that job_type17:17
pandarlandy: where's the question ?17:18
weshayssbarnea, how's it going? need anything?17:20
ssbarneaweshay: hi! nope, everything in order I started following the training materials. I want to fast-track the courses, mainly to finish CL110 asap.17:22
weshayrock on17:22
ssbarneai had to request an extension on RHU subscription as mine expired in april.17:22
ssbarneaweshay: btw, you will have to update the roster, we do not have edit rights aparently.17:23
weshayemail anton17:23
weshaynot me17:23
rlandypanda: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/581376/2/zuul.d/multinode-jobs.yaml17:24
rlandy^^ the 4 node job17:24
rlandy multinode-1ctlr-featureset00917:24
rlandyas the job_type17:24
rlandythat seems wring17:24
rlandywrong17:24
ssbarneamarios already did, i hope mentioned me. i am bit surprised that there is no git repo to update the roster :)17:25
ssbarneaa CR would be more openstack way of updating it :D17:25
pandarlandy: that's definitely wrong17:25
rlandypanda: yep - I just blanket converted the nodeset17:26
rlandybut it can't be correct17:26
*** quiquell|off has quit IRC17:31
*** rfolco is now known as rfolco_brb17:31
pandarlandy: it was wrong also in zullv2 configuration.17:34
pandarlandy: I don't think that job ever worked17:34
pandaproperly17:34
pandaand it's even better if we shut it down17:35
rlandypanda: well it's one of two things - 4 node or one node17:35
rlandyit's never called but we need to define it correctly17:35
rlandyI can leave the 4 node definition in the nodesets17:35
rlandysince we will eventually use it17:35
rlandybut I think that job should be regular own node17:35
rlandyone17:35
*** ykarel|away has quit IRC17:35
pandarlandy: yes, but I have not idea what's the node configuration for taht job17:35
rlandypanda: ok - I am updating the review accordingly17:36
*** holser_ has quit IRC17:36
pandarlandy: wait, there's more17:37
*** holser_ has joined #oooq17:37
rlandydo I win a pony????17:37
pandarlandy: a Unicorn.17:38
pandarlandy: there is no scenario00517:38
pandarlandy: anywhere17:38
rlandylol17:38
pandathat job is a joke17:38
rlandyok - I think we can just delete it17:38
pandarlandy: in newton the max is 004, in pike they start with 00617:39
rlandypanda: it's like platform Platform 9¾ at King's Cross Station - you can see it with magic17:40
*** atoth_ has joined #oooq17:41
pandarlandy: I was imagining more the Order of the Phoenix HQ. A special git command and a secret directory appears17:42
pandaweshay: I asked in #tripleo too, but 4 nodes job never  never tested anything.17:42
pandaweshay: we don't even understand what's the use case associated17:43
rlandypanda: fine - I ma deleting the 4 node nodeset and that sceanrio005 job17:43
rlandyunless there is a particular objection17:43
pandarlandy: I would say nuke it for now, if we later understand what's needed there we'll add it17:43
rlandypanda: ack17:44
*** atoth has quit IRC17:44
*** panda is now known as panda|off17:44
*** atoth_ has quit IRC17:45
*** atoth has joined #oooq17:46
*** atoth has quit IRC17:48
weshaysshnaidm|bbl, ping me when you are back or tomorrow17:55
*** holser_ has quit IRC18:02
*** kopecmartin has quit IRC18:14
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|brb18:56
hubbot`FAILING CHECK JOBS on stable/ocata: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024-ocata @ https://review.openstack.org/564291, master: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades, tripleo-ci-centos-7-3nodes-multinode, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario001-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario007-multinode-oooq-container, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario002 (2 more messages)19:00
*** atoth has joined #oooq19:06
*** rlandy|brb is now known as rlandy19:27
*** trown is now known as trown|lunch19:32
*** sshnaidm|bbl has quit IRC19:45
*** sshnaidm|bbl has joined #oooq19:52
*** rfolco_brb is now known as rfolco19:56
sshnaidm|bblweshay, ping19:57
*** holser_ has joined #oooq20:17
*** atoth has quit IRC20:27
*** atoth has joined #oooq20:27
rlandyweshay: have a moment to chat re: perf job?20:31
weshayrlandy, ya20:31
weshaysshnaidm|bbl, will chat w/ you tomorrow20:31
weshayrlandy, sec20:33
rlandyweshay: bj?20:33
*** trown|lunch is now known as trown20:33
ssbarneacan I use a magic comment to retry a specific zuul job? like "recheck jobname"?20:38
rlandyno  - but that would be nice20:39
*** rfolco has quit IRC20:40
weshayback20:41
weshayrlandy, k20:41
rlandyweshay: joining your bj20:41
*** tcw1 has joined #oooq20:51
*** tcw has quit IRC20:51
*** holser_ has quit IRC20:57
weshaysshnaidm|bbl, see you there20:59
weshayshould we just chat now?20:59
sshnaidm|bblweshay, we can21:00
hubbot`FAILING CHECK JOBS on stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/567224, stable/ocata: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024-ocata @ https://review.openstack.org/564291, master: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-container-to-container-upgrades-master, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container @  (1 more message)21:00
weshaysshnaidm|bbl, meh... it's not urget21:00
weshayurgent21:00
sshnaidm|bblweshay, ok, then tomorrow21:00
weshayrlandy, this was fixed right? https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/177356921:03
openstackLaunchpad bug 1773569 in tripleo "TQE: ovb-create-stack.yml role overrides are not working as expected" [High,Triaged] - Assigned to Ronelle Landy (rlandy)21:03
* weshay looks at code.eng21:03
rlandyi don;t think I ever saw that problem21:04
rlandyI'll comment when I have this review in21:04
weshayrlandy, k21:04
weshayrlandy, no worries about that bug21:05
rlandysorry -trying not to mess up this fs matrix21:05
*** trown is now known as trown|outtypewww21:05
*** yolanda__ has joined #oooq21:18
weshayrlandy, this seems to be working just fine for me https://review.openstack.org/#/c/579161/21:19
rlandyweshay: happy to hear that21:20
weshayrlandy, how close are are we to taking off the WIP21:20
rlandyit's missing one change21:20
rlandyif you add that, sure21:20
* rlandy gets21:20
*** yolanda_ has quit IRC21:21
rlandyweshay: https://github.com/openstack-infra/tripleo-ci/blob/master/zuul.d/base.yaml#L1921:22
rlandy^^ missing that - after we add that, it can go out of WIP21:22
*** tcw1 is now known as tcw21:37
*** agopi has joined #oooq22:10
*** yolanda_ has joined #oooq22:29
*** yolanda__ has quit IRC22:32
*** rlandy is now known as rlandy|bbl22:44
hubbot`FAILING CHECK JOBS on stable/queens: tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario000-multinode-oooq-container-upgrades @ https://review.openstack.org/567224, stable/ocata: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024-ocata @ https://review.openstack.org/564291, master: legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-container-to-container-upgrades-master, tripleo-ci-centos-7-scenario008-multinode-oooq-container @  (1 more message)23:00
*** tosky has quit IRC23:08

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!