*** eernst has joined #kata-dev | 02:21 | |
*** eernst has quit IRC | 02:28 | |
*** lpetrut has joined #kata-dev | 07:29 | |
*** lpetrut has quit IRC | 07:30 | |
*** lpetrut has joined #kata-dev | 07:31 | |
*** sgarzare has joined #kata-dev | 08:12 | |
*** jodh has joined #kata-dev | 08:26 | |
*** jodh has quit IRC | 09:01 | |
*** jodh has joined #kata-dev | 09:04 | |
*** davidgiluk has joined #kata-dev | 09:04 | |
*** gwhaley has joined #kata-dev | 09:10 | |
*** sgarzare has quit IRC | 09:10 | |
*** sgarzare has joined #kata-dev | 09:12 | |
*** david-lyle has quit IRC | 09:16 | |
*** david-lyle has joined #kata-dev | 09:16 | |
*** amorenoz has joined #kata-dev | 09:17 | |
fidencio | gwhaley: hey/ping. we talked Yesterday and I'd like to give you an update in the issue. It's solved, the problemas was that the image I built was done in a way that "virtio_fs" would be looked for, while more recent kernels have chaged the module name to "virtiofs" | 10:03 |
---|---|---|
fidencio | gwhaley: meaning, the message was coming from the agent ... but I should have realised the agent is used to build the image and hacked there. | 10:03 |
fidencio | gwhaley: thanks for your help! | 10:03 |
gwhaley | fidencio: np. just to make sure we are clear - the agent does not 'build the image', it is 'built into the image', yes? :-) | 10:13 |
gwhaley | I've not heard about the virtiofs rename before - I'm going to /cc maybe @devimc, @davidgiluk just for reference. | 10:14 |
davidgiluk | that changed quite a while back now | 10:15 |
fidencio | gwhaley: yep, built into the image :-) | 10:15 |
davidgiluk | I think it happened during the review stage when it was merged upstream, someone objected to the _ | 10:15 |
*** sameo has joined #kata-dev | 10:24 | |
*** jugs has quit IRC | 10:51 | |
*** jugs has joined #kata-dev | 10:52 | |
*** rattlesnake has joined #kata-dev | 11:16 | |
*** devimc has joined #kata-dev | 12:43 | |
*** fuentess has joined #kata-dev | 13:10 | |
*** rattlesnake has quit IRC | 13:23 | |
*** rattlesnake has joined #kata-dev | 13:32 | |
*** canyounot has joined #kata-dev | 13:58 | |
*** canyounot has quit IRC | 13:59 | |
*** devimc has quit IRC | 14:52 | |
*** lpetrut has quit IRC | 15:08 | |
*** pcaruana has quit IRC | 15:27 | |
*** rattlesnake has quit IRC | 15:31 | |
*** pcaruana has joined #kata-dev | 15:33 | |
*** igordc has joined #kata-dev | 15:37 | |
*** david-lyle is now known as dklyle | 15:53 | |
*** eernst has joined #kata-dev | 15:58 | |
*** eernst has quit IRC | 15:58 | |
*** devimc has joined #kata-dev | 16:01 | |
*** th0din has quit IRC | 16:13 | |
*** rattlesnake has joined #kata-dev | 16:34 | |
*** rattlesnake has quit IRC | 16:49 | |
*** th0din has joined #kata-dev | 17:17 | |
kata-irc-bot | <graham.whaley> hey folks, so, question.... for you folks out there who are deploying kata - have any of you worked on any `fluentd` integration - any specialisation for instance to ingest the kata logs? I'm curious. Somebody must have done some ingestion, no? /cc @xu @aprice @davidgiluk just in case it rings a bell :slightly_smiling_face: : https://github.com/kata-containers/runtime/issues/985 | 17:30 |
* davidgiluk looks up fluentd | 17:32 | |
kata-irc-bot | Action: graham.whaley notes, like `logstash`, but different :slightly_smiling_face: | 17:32 |
davidgiluk | graham.whaley: I need to ask that question of someone | 17:33 |
kata-irc-bot | <graham.whaley> thx. I guess there is some openshift somebody who must handle this stuff :slightly_smiling_face: | 17:34 |
davidgiluk | gwhaley: Yeh I just found: the Openshift docs for fluentd, so now I need to ...hmm; let me find out | 17:34 |
*** jodh has quit IRC | 17:53 | |
*** th0din has quit IRC | 17:57 | |
*** sgarzare has quit IRC | 18:00 | |
*** gwhaley has quit IRC | 18:09 | |
*** igordc has quit IRC | 18:18 | |
*** th0din has joined #kata-dev | 18:31 | |
*** igordc has joined #kata-dev | 18:49 | |
*** igordc has quit IRC | 19:19 | |
*** davidgiluk has quit IRC | 20:12 | |
*** th0din has quit IRC | 21:03 | |
*** th0din has joined #kata-dev | 21:06 | |
kata-irc-bot | <robert> Hi everyone. I'm on the marketing team at the Foundation and am working on a byline article about Kata to pitch to a publication like The New Stack or ZDNet. It'll be about the status of Kata Containers and where the project is headed next (in very general terms). Our game plan is to start with existing source material like the case study and blog. Then, we'd like input from the AC or anyone else in the community, including quotes and | 21:34 |
kata-irc-bot | answering a question or two that we might have. If you're interested in collaborating, just raise your hand. (we don't have to use your name if that's a concern) We'll be working on the draft over the next couple of weeks. Thanks! | 21:34 |
*** devimc has quit IRC | 22:03 | |
*** fuentess has quit IRC | 22:38 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.3 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!